To confirm that lysosomes regulate intracellular lipid, the effect of inhibiting lysosomal hydrolysis on lipid stores was examined. Lysosomal inhibition increased cellular TG and cholesterol content (
Supplementary Fig. 7a, b) as well as LD accumulation (
Supplementary Fig. 7c) in the absence or presence of a lipid stimulus. Double immunofluorescence studies revealed increased co-localization of LDs with the lysosome-associated membrane protein type 1 (LAMP1) in oleate or MCDM ( and
Supplementary Fig. 8). In the absence of a stimulus for TG formation, LD/LAMP1 co-localization was observed only when lysosomal hydrolysis was inhibited, indicating that rapid LD turnover occurred in lysosomes under these conditions (
Supplementary Fig. 8). In contrast to MCDM, where lysosomal inhibition increased LD/LAMP1 co-localization to some extent, this treatment did not modify LD association to lysosomes with oleate supplementation. This finding could represent an inability of the autophagic system to accommodate to the sudden FFA increase. Also supporting this possibility, autophagic flow (measured as LC3-II degradation or increased LC3-positive puncta by immunofluorescence;
Supplementary Fig. 9a–c) was twofold greater in cells in MCDM compared to regular medium, but did not change with oleate. Despite increased autophagic flow, only a moderate decrease in the activity (20–30%) of the autophagy repressor mTOR (also known as FRAP1) as determined by autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of its downstream substrate p70S6K (also known as RPS6KB1) was observed with MCDM (
Supplementary Fig. 9d). In addition, the absence of change in the autophagy activator beclin 1 indicates that autophagy was not induced in response to lipid stimuli. Instead, basal autophagy may be primarily responsible for regulating cellular lipid storage. Consistent with this conclusion, induction of autophagy further decreased lipid stores. Treatment with rapamycin or lithium chloride, activators of autophagy, significantly decreased LD number and TGs, and increased LD/LAMP1 co-localization (more evident with lysosomal inhibition) with lipid stimuli (
Supplementary Figs 8 and 10a). As for basal autophagy, the flow of rapamycin-induced autophagy (measured as the increase in LD/LAMP1 co-localization with lysosomal proteolysis inhibition) was considerably reduced in cells exposed to oleate (
Supplementary Fig. 8). The different autophagy effectors were unaffected by oleate (
Supplementary Fig. 9d), indicating that autophagosome formation is preserved but their clearance is compromised to some extent in these cells and suggesting that increased LDs result from both augmented LD formation and diminished lysosomal breakdown.
In support of autophagy mediating delivery of LD content to lysosomes, LD/LAMP1 co-localization was markedly reduced by inhibitors of autophagosome formation (3MA) or autophagosome–lysosome fusion (vinblastine; and
Supplementary Fig. 8). Similarly, LD/LAMP1 co-localization was lower in si
Atg5 cells and did not increase when lysosomal proteolysis was blocked (
Supplementary Fig. 11a). Furthermore, LD co-localization with the autophagosome marker LC3 demonstrated a direct association between LDs and autophagosomes ( and
Supplementary Fig. 12). In the absence of a stimulus for lipid accumulation, LD/LC3 co-localization was more prominent with lysosomal inhibition (
Supplementary Fig. 10b), supporting a constitutive function for autophagy in LD regulation. Induction of autophagy by rapamycin or lithium chloride also increased LD/LC3 co-localization in untreated and oleate-treated cells (
Supplementary Figs 10b, c and 12). The lack of a significant increase in LD/LC3 co-localization in cells in MCDM during autophagic induction is probably the consequence of their increased autophagic flux ensuring efficient lysosomal clearance of newly formed LD-containing autophagosomes (
Supplementary Fig. 12). In contrast to the blocking effect of vinblastine on LD delivery to lysosomes, this drug did not decrease LD/LC3 co-localization ( and
Supplementary Fig. 12). This result indicates that LD engulfment by LC3-positive membranes does not require microtubules, arguing against co-localization representing fusion between LDs and previously formed autophagosomes.
Fluorescence real-time video microscopy revealed that BODIPY 493/503-labelled structures (presumably complete LDs and LD-containing vesicles) and lysosomes associate in a dynamic manner (
Supplementary Fig. 13; also see Supplementary Videos 1 and 2). Triple labelling for lysosomes, lipids and TIP47 confirmed that all LD components (lipids and proteins) were delivered to lysosomes (
Supplementary Fig. 11b). Electron microscopy was used to elucidate further the mechanism of LD sequestration by autophagic vesicles. LDs were easily identifiable as round light-density structures, not limited by a bilayer lipid membrane (), with homogenous amorphous content and an average diameter of 0.5 μm that increased 10–15-fold in response to lipid stimuli (
Supplementary Fig. 14). Double-membrane structures occupying up to 80% of a single LD were identified (), along with similar density cytosolic autophagolysosome-like vesicles one-tenth of the size of a LD. These vesicles were surrounded by a double membrane and could have originated from sequestration of a portion of a large LD or an entire small LD (). Immunogold labelling revealed the presence of LC3 on the LD (often concentrated around membranous structures) and on the smaller lipid-containing double-membrane vesicles (autolipophagosomes; ). In some instances a small dense region heavily labelled for LC3 was present in the proximity of a LD or associated to its surface (). In cells in regular media, only a small percentage of double-membrane vesicles with content of density similar to LDs were detected (<20%), and of these less than half contained only lipid cargo (). However, both stimuli for lipid accumulation increased the number of lipid-containing vesicles up to 80% with almost half containing only lipid, indicating some level of selectivity towards lipid cargo (). Prolonged serum removal, a known stimulus of lipolysis, also increased LD/LC3 co-localization in hepatocytes to levels comparable to those from a lipid stimulus (
Supplementary Fig. 15a). In contrast, co-localization of LC3 with mitochondria, a common cargo of autophagic vesicles, decreased after prolonged serum removal (
Supplementary Fig. 15b). These results indicate that, although basal autophagy of LDs is part of an ‘in bulk’ nonselective process, conditions of increased lipolysis switch selectivity towards macroautophagic engulfment of LDs or macrolipophagy.