Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of archdischfnArchives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal & NeonatalVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 July; 92(4): F320–F324.
PMCID: PMC2675431

Are B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N‐terminal‐pro‐BNP useful in neonates?


B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N‐terminal‐pro‐BNP (NTpBNP) have a major role in screening and diagnosis of cardiac disease and monitoring of the treatment response in children and adults. This review discusses the evidence underpinning the potential benefits of these natriuretic peptides in neonatology. They may serve as a useful adjunct to echocardiography in the diagnosis of patent ductus arteriosus and its response to treatment and the diagnosis of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. However, more work is needed to explore the possible roles of BNP/NTpBNP in the management of sepsis and monitoring of cardiac performance in neonates.

Keywords: preterm infant, sepsis, ventricular function, patent ductus arteriosus, natriuretic peptides, BNP, NT pro‐BNP

Natriuretic peptides are ring‐shaped amino acid sequences with various actions. Four natriuretic peptides have been described to date, namely A, B, C and D.1 Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is synthesised by and released from atrial myocytes. It lowers the blood pressure and has diuretic, natriuretic and kaliuretic properties. Brain natriuretic peptide was named as such following its discovery in porcine brains.2 However, there is a much higher concentration in the ventricles of the heart, hence the current name B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP).3 C‐type natriuretic peptide is found in the brain and coronary vessels. It regulates vascular tone and lacks natriuretic properties.4 Dendroaspis natriuretic peptide (DNP) is found in snake venom and there is high affinity between DNP and natriuretic peptide receptor A. It has no known function in humans.5

Physiology of BNP and NTpBNP

BNP has a 32 amino acid ring structure, and the sequence is present on chromosome 1. It acts on a cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)‐coupled receptor via a transmembrane domain.6 The ring structure must remain intact to ensure receptor binding to natriuretic peptide receptors A and B (NPR‐A/B). The ventricles of the heart are the main site of BNP synthesis and release in response to volume and pressure loading, and ventricular stress. Pro‐BNP, the inactive precursor, is cleaved into BNP, the active component, and N‐terminal‐pro‐BNP (NTpBNP), an inactive byproduct. The half‐life of BNP is 20 min and of NTpBNP is 60 min.7 The instability of BNP messenger‐RNA renders storage difficult and acts as regulator of serum BNP levels.

BNP causes diuresis, natriuresis, arterial and venous vasodilatation, and it antagonises the renin–angiotensin system. The net effect is a reduction of intravascular volume, and ventricular preload and afterload. Recently, it has been associated with the regulation of pulmonary vasculature, possibly including the ductus arteriosus.8,9 BNP is excreted after cleavage by membrane‐bound neutral peptidase, which is found in the kidneys and vascular tree. It is also cleared from the blood by direct binding to the natriuretic peptide receptor C, endocytosis and lysosomal degradation.10

Clinical role of BNP

BNP and NTpBNP are easily measured with commercially available kits including bedside tests. Clinical studies have shown excellent correlation between BNP and NTpBNP levels in both adult and cord blood.11,12,13 In adults, BNP is associated with poor ventricular function. Furthermore, the possible link between natriuretic peptides and sepsis may lead to better understanding of the mechanisms involved in cardiogenic shock.14 Recent research has concentrated on the potential use of these markers in paediatric and neonatal medicine.

Conventional methods of clinical and radiological assessment have poor diagnostic sensitivity to differentiate between cardiac and non‐cardiac causes of dyspnoea. Moreover, echocardiography may not be readily available in some institutions. BNP and NTpBNP are good screening tools that detect chronic ventricular dysfunction, with sensitivities and specificities surpassing those of clinical and radiological methods.15 They are useful in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure in dyspnoeic patients presenting to the emergency department.11 In addition, these markers facilitate screening, treatment response and prognosis in asymptomatic patients with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction.16,17,18

Although not as common as in adults, heart disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in infants and children. BNP and NTpBNP levels are raised in children with heart disease, leading to increased ventricular pressure and volume loading.19,20 The NTpBNP/BNP ratio decreases with increasing age, reflecting age‐dependent differences in metabolic clearance of both peptides—an important consideration for comparison studies.21 In addition, plasma BNP correlates closely with shunt volume in left‐to‐right cardiac lesions, increases with decreasing left ventricular ejection fraction and correlates positively with increasing right ventricular systolic pressures.22 NTpBNP levels are useful for distinguishing between acute and chronic left ventricular dysfunction (mean levels 65 600 pg/ml and 1125 pg/ml, respectively).23 The levels can also reflect functional capacity in children with congestive heart failure.19 In children with dilated cardiomyopathy NTpBNP is a good marker for persistent left ventricular dysfunction with levels normalising in children whose ventricular function shows improvement on echocardiography.24 In infants with respiratory distress, measurement of plasma NTpBNP can differentiate between acute heart failure and lung disease, and it can be used to monitor response to treatment.25

Raised level of NTpBNP preoperatively in children undergoing open heart surgery are linked with complicated postoperative outcomes.26 A cytoprotective role has been suggested for BNP based on the observation of persistently high levels after cardiac surgery.27 BNP levels tend to be higher in children receiving long‐term immunosuppressive treatment following liver transplantation than in healthy controls, despite the lack of echocardiographic evidence of cardiac compromise. This suggests that BNP levels help to identify patients with early cardiac damage.28

Limited data have demonstrated the potential benefit of these peptides as markers of cyanotic and obstructive lesions. Cowley et al found a significant correlation between left ventricle to aorta gradient and BNP levels.29 In patients with aortic stenosis, NTpBNP has been used to monitor response to valve replacement.30 In a recent study, Hopkins et al found higher levels of NTpBNP in 10 adult patients with cyanotic heart disease (including Eisenmenger's syndrome) despite lack of ventricular pressure loading.31

Application of BNP and NTpBNP in neonates

Levels of BNP and NTpBNP surge at birth, plateauing on days 3–4. This is followed by a steady fall to reach a constant level in infancy.32 The surge is probably multifactorial including the loss of the placental low pressure system. Exposure to the initially supra‐systemic pulmonary pressures subjects the ventricle to greater volume and pressure loading. Furthermore, the placenta has a role in clearance of natriuretic peptides and loss of this clearance system contributes to the high levels.33 Therefore high levels of BNP at birth have a crucial regulatory role in the haemodynamic changes associated with transition to extrauterine life. Kidney maturation, a rise in systemic vascular resistance and a fall in pulmonary pressures explain the subsequent fall in the peptide levels.

Several characteristics distinguish the premature neonatal heart from that of older infants. The neonatal myocardium has a higher water concentration and a greater proportion of “stiff” collagen resulting in a non‐compliant ventricle and diastolic dysfunction with relatively poor ventricular filling.34 The relatively higher heart rate in neonates can compound this problem. Therefore adequate left ventricular function in neonates may be essential to maintain adequate systemic perfusion. However conventional bedside measurements of cardiac function, such as blood pressure monitoring may not accurately reflect systemic perfusion.35 BNP may indicate the degree of ventricular function and reduce the reliance on echocardiography.

Normal values of BNP and NTpBNP in neonates

There is a paucity of normative values of BNP and NTpBNP in neonates ((tablestables 1 and 22).). Reference ranges quoted in the literature vary depending on timing of the test, the kits used and the population investigated. Natriuretic peptides are thought not to cross the placenta and therefore any variation in neonates must be explained intrinsically.38

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Reference ranges for B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in neonates
Table thumbnail
Table 2 Reference ranges for N‐terminal‐pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NTpBNP) in neonates

Role BNP and NTpBNP in the management of patent ductus arteriosus

Recent animal studies have examined a possible pathophysiological association between BNP and postnatal ductal patency. Ductal tissue from fetal and newborn mice shows a changing pattern of expression of natriuretic peptide receptors. Fetal ductal tissue has a higher ratio of NPR‐A/B (maintains ductal patency) to NPR‐C (responsible for degradation). This ratio reverses in the ductal tissue of the newborn mouse suggesting that vasodilatory effects in the fetus are reduced after birth by ligand internalisation.8 These findings provide the first evidence for the possible pathological role of BNP in maintaining ductal patency after birth. They suggest that elevated levels of natriuretic peptide due to patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) or other factors act in a harmful feed‐forward mechanism inhibiting ductal closure after birth. Identification of other factors which contribute to BNP production may aid in better, more physiological management of a PDA.

BNP may be a useful screening tool for the presence of a PDA in premature neonates as levels of BNP are high in the presence of a significantly patent duct. Flynn et al showed that BNP correlated well with ductal size (r = 0.62), increased pulmonary flow (r = 0.63) and increased steal (retrograde diastolic flow) in the descending aorta and the superior mesenteric artery (r = 0.54 and 0.41, respectively). However, they found a poor correlation between left atrial to aortic ratio (LA:Ao ratio) and BNP levels (r = 0.33).43 Choi et al found a stronger correlation (r = 0.73).44 The difference might be due to the degree of hydration of the infants. Dehydrated or fluid‐restricted neonates may have a smaller left atrium, and thus a reduced LA:Ao ratio and altered relationship with BNP. There is a wide variation in the levels of BNP associated with a significant PDA (range 70–1110 pg/ml).44,45,46,47 This raises the possibility of further unidentified factors influencing BNP levels.

BNP has also been shown to be useful in monitoring treatment response to medical PDA ligation, with falling levels comparable with those in preterm neonates without a PDA.44 Ductal closure cannot alone be responsible for the fall in BNP levels, and some neonates have low BNP levels despite a large haemodynamically significant duct.45,46 The exact mechanisms of these neonatal phenomena are still unclear.

Although BNP may not replace echo in the diagnosis of PDA, it may obviate the need for repeated echocardiography to confirm ductal closure following treatment. The use of NTpBNP to detect PDA and monitor treatment is yet to be explored. NTpBNP may serve as a better marker than BNP because of its better stability and longer half‐life. There are no bedside assays available for NTpBNP, although BNP can be measured using a bedside device.

BNP and management of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn

Pulmonary vascular resistance may remain elevated during the neonatal period leading to difficulties in oxygenation and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). Echocardiography helps distinguish PPHN from other respiratory and cardiac disorders by demonstrating the supra‐systemic pulmonary vascular pressures.

Animal research has shown a possible therapeutic effect of BNP in PPHN. Isolated vessel studies in fetal lambs with PPHN by induced ductal ligation found an abundance of NPR‐A. When exposed to BNP these pulmonary arteries and veins relaxed but the responses were significantly lower than in controls.48 Research is underway examining the therapeutic effect of recombinant human BNP on neonates with resistant PPHN unresponsive to nitric oxide.49

BNP can aid in the diagnosis of PPHN. In a study of 47 term neonates, Reynolds et al showed significantly higher BNP levels in neonates with a diagnosis of PPHN by echocardiography than in neonates with other respiratory diseases and controls in room air. BNP levels remained elevated compared with the other two groups for the first four days and correlated well with the pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve (r2 = 0.83).8 In this study, BNP levels greater than 850 pg/ml were found only in neonates with PPHN.

BNP and NTpBNP as markers of left ventricular function in preterm neonates

BNP and NTpBNP have been shown to be an invaluable adjunct to echocardiography when assessing ventricular performance in infants and children.22,23 This benefit will have obvious advantages in neonatal intensive care. Cardiology‐provided echocardiography is not routinely available in this setting to assess cardiac performance and a biochemical surrogate would be useful.

One study found no correlation between BNP and shortening fraction or blood pressure in preterm neonates.43 However, shortening fraction is an unreliable measure of systolic left ventricular function in the first few days of life. It is measured following M‐mode echocardiography of the long parasternal view of the left ventricle. The calculation is based on the difference between left ventricular end‐diastolic and end‐systolic diameters. High right ventricular pressures impair the movement of the ventricular septal wall. Therefore, shortening fraction does not correlate with left ventricular output, one of the major determinants of systemic perfusion in neonates. Correlating BNP and NTpBNP with left ventricular output (measured by echocardiography) may yield much more information about cardiac performance and provide a non‐invasive method of assessing systemic perfusion.

Correlating BNP and NTpBNP with left and right ventricular diastolic function may provide more valuable information. A degree of diastolic dysfunction occurs in all neonates, and if severe may worsen respiratory disease and contribute to heart failure. Echocardiographic parameters have been established to assess progression through neonatal life. Linking BNP or NTpBNP may provide a simple screening test to assess the resolution of such dysfunction, especially after ductal closure, a major determinant of BNP levels. Its value could lie in differentiating cardiac from non‐cardiac causes of reventilation of preterm neonates, as has been shown in children.25,50

BNP and NTpBNP as a marker of neonatal sepsis

In animal models, plasma BNP levels have been shown to rise with induced endotoxaemia, and the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin‐6 has been linked with BNP production. Therefore, the rise in BNP may not be solely due to ventricular overloading. In neonatal rat cardiac myocytes, transcriptional activation of the BNP gene was initiated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), suggesting that elevated BNP levels under endotoxaemic conditions are partially mediated by LPS.14 In patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, BNP and NTpBNP levels are highly elevated51 and, despite significant haemodynamic differences, comparable with those found in adults with acute heart failure. It remains to be determined how elevation in natriuretic peptide levels is linked with inflammation and sepsis‐associated myocardial dysfunction.52 BNP has also been shown to have prognostic value in these patients, with levels greater than 650 pg/ml highly predictive of death.53 NTpBNP may also serve as a useful laboratory marker predicting survival in patients with severe sepsis,54 and it seems to be an early predictor of myocardial dysfunction in patients with septic shock.55 In a study comparing children with sepsis and those with acute left ventricular dysfunction NTpBNP levels were higher in the latter group. However, there was a significant overlap in NTpBNP levels between the groups possibly precluding its use as a sole means to differentiate between these conditions. A cardiac aetiology may be suspected if NTpBNP levels are excessively elevated and associated with acute haemodynamic deterioration in infants and children.56 BNP and probably NTpBNP may serve as a marker of cardiac dysfunction associated with sepsis in preterm neonates and be a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of sepsis. This possible association is currently being investigated at our centre.


BNP and NTpBNP have major diagnostic roles in the adult population and their role as therapeutic agents is emerging. In children, BNP and NTpBNP serve as indicators of cardiac disease and may be used to monitor response to treatment. The potential benefit of these natriuretic peptides in neonatology is immense. More studies are needed to explore the possible roles of BNP/NTpBNP in the management of sepsis and monitoring of cardiac performance. These two possible confounding factors limit their reliability in the diagnosis of PDA and its response to treatment.


BNP - B‐type natriuretic peptide

NTpBNP - N‐terminal‐pro‐BNP

PPHN - persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn


Competing interests: None.


1. Vesely D L, Cliffs E. Atrial natriuretic hormones. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1992
2. Sudoh T, Kangawa K, Minamino W. et al A new natriuretic peptide in porcine brain. Nature 1988. 33278–81.81 [PubMed]
3. Saito Y, Nakao K, Itoh H. et al Brain natriuretic peptide is a novel cardiac hormone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1989. 158360–368.368 [PubMed]
4. Vesely D L, Douglass M A, Dietz J R. et al Three peptides form the atrial natriuretic factor prohormone amino terminus lower blood pressure and produce a diuresis, natriuresis, and/or kaliuresis in humans. Circulation 1994. 901129–1140.1140 [PubMed]
5. Singh G, Kuc R E, Maguire J J. et al Novel snake venom ligand dendroaspis natriuretic peptide is selective for natriuretic peptide receptor‐A in human heart: downregulation of natriuretic peptide receptor‐A in heart failure. Circ Res 2006. 99183–190.190 [PubMed]
6. Hunt P H, Yandle T G, Nicholls M G. et al The amino‐terminal portion of probrain natriuretic peptide (proBNP) circulates in human plasma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995. 2141175–1183.1183 [PubMed]
7. Witthaut R. Science review: natriuretic peptides in critical illness. Crit Care 2004. 8342–349.349 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Reynolds E W, Ellington J G, Vranicar M. et al Brain‐type natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis and management of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Pediatrics 2004. 1141297–1304.1304 [PubMed]
9. O'Mara P W, Poole S D, Brown N. et al Regulation of the fetal and newborn ductus arteriosus (da) by natriuretic peptides. E‐PAS 2006. 592875.314
10. Maack T. Receptors of atrial natriuretic factor. Annu Rev Physiol 1992. 5411–27.27 [PubMed]
11. Mueller T, Gegenhuber A, Poelz W. et al Diagnostic accuracy of B type natriuretic peptide and amino terminal proBNP in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. Heart 2005. 91606–612.612 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Soldin S J, Soldin O P, Boyajian A J. et al Pediatric brain natriuretic peptide and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide reference intervals. Clin Chim Acta 2006. 366304–308.308 [PubMed]
13. Hammerer‐Lercher A, Neubauer E, Muller S. et al Head‐to‐head comparison of N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide and N‐terminal pro‐atrial natriuretic peptide in diagnosing left ventricular dysfunction. Clin Chim Acta 2001. 310193–197.197 [PubMed]
14. Tomaru Ki K, Arai M, Yokoyama T. et al Transcriptional activation of the BNP gene by lipopolysaccharide is mediated through GATA elements in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2002. 34649–659.659 [PubMed]
15. Abassi Z, Karram T, Ellaham S. et al Implications of the natriuretic peptide system in the pathogenesis of heart failure: diagnostic and therapeutic importance. Pharmacol Ther 2004. 102223–241.241 [PubMed]
16. Redfield M M, Rodeheffer R J, Jacobsen S J. et al Plasma brain natriuretic peptide to detect pre‐clinical ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction: a community‐based study. Circulation 2004. 1093171–3181.3181 [PubMed]
17. Troughton R E, Farmpton C M, Yandle et al Treatment of heart failure guided by plasma aminoterminal brain natriuretic peptide (N‐BNP) concentrations. Lancet 2000. 3551126–1130.1130 [PubMed]
18. Anand I S, Fisher L D, Chiang Y T. et al Changes in brain natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine over time and mortality and morbidity in the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val‐HeFT). Circulation 2003. 1071278–1283.1283 [PubMed]
19. Westerlind A, Wahlander H, Lindstedt G. et al Clinical signs of heart failure are associated with increased levels of natriuretic peptide types B and A in children with congenital heart defects or cardiomyopathy. Acta Paediatr 2004. 93340–345.345 [PubMed]
20. Nir A, Bar‐Oz B, Perles Z. et al N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide: reference plasma levels from birth to adolescence. Elevated levels at birth and in infants and children with heart diseases. Acta Paediatr 2004. 93603–607.607 [PubMed]
21. Koch A M, Rauh M, Zink S. et al Decreasing ratio of plasma N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide and B‐type natriuretic peptide according to age. Acta Paediatr 2006. 95805–809.809 [PubMed]
22. Koch A, Zink S, Singer H. B‐type natriuretic peptide in paediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2006. 27861–866.866 [PubMed]
23. Fried I, Bar‐Oz B, Perles Z. et al N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide levels in acute versus chronic left ventricular dysfunction. J Pediatr 2006. 14928–31.31 [PubMed]
24. Nasser N, Perlez Z, Rein A J. et al NT‐proBNP as a marker for persistent cardiac disease in children with history of dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis. Pediatr Cardiol 2006. 2787–90.90 [PubMed]
25. Cohen S, Springer C, Avital A. et al Amino‐terminal pro‐brain‐type natriuretic peptide: heart or lung disease in pediatric respiratory distress? Pediatrics 2005. 1151347–1350.1350 [PubMed]
26. Gessler P, Knirsch W, Schmitt B. et al Prognostic value of plasma N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide in children with congenital heart defects and open‐heart surgery. J Pediatr 2006. 148372–376.376 [PubMed]
27. Koch A, Kitzsteiner T, Zink S. et al Impact of cardiac surgery on plasma levels of B‐type natriuretic peptide in children with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2007. 114339–344.344 [PubMed]
28. Shalev A, Nir A, Granot E. Cardiac function in children post‐orthotopic liver transplantation: echocardiographic parameters and biochemical markers of subclinical cardiovascular damage. Pediatr Transplant 2005. 9718–722.722 [PubMed]
29. Cowley C G, Bradley J D, Shaddy R E. B‐type natriuretic peptide levels in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2004. 25336–340.340 [PubMed]
30. Weber M, Arnold R, Rau M. et al Relation of N‐terminal pro B‐type natriuretic peptide to progression of aortic valve disease. Eur Heart J 2005. 261023–1030.1030 [PubMed]
31. Hopkins W E, Chen Z, Fukagawa N K. et al Increased atrial and brain natriuretic peptides in adults with cyanotic congenital heart disease: enhanced understanding of the relationship between hypoxia and natriuretic peptide secretion. Circulation 2005. 1092872–2877.2877 [PubMed]
32. Mir T S, Marohn S, Laer S. et al Plasma concentrations of N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide in control children from the neonatal to adolescent period and in children with congestive heart failure. Pediatrics 2002. 110e76 [PubMed]
33. Mir T S, Laux R, Hellwege H H. et al Plasma concentrations of aminoterminal pro atrial natriuretic peptide and aminoterminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in healthy neonates: marked and rapid increase after birth. Pediatrics 2003. 112896–899.899 [PubMed]
34. Friedman W F. The intrinsic physiologic properties of the developing heart. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1972. 1587–111.111 [PubMed]
35. Subhedar N V. Treatment of hypotension in newborns. Semin Neonatol 2003. 51913–915.915
36. Koch A, Singer H. Normal values of B type natriuretic peptide in infants, children, and adolescents. Heart 2003. 89875–878.878 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Kunii Y, Kamada M, Ohtsuki S. et al Plasma brain natriuretic peptide and the evaluation of volume overload in infants and children with congenital heart disease. Acta Med Okayama 2003. 57191–197.197 [PubMed]
38. Bar‐Oz B, Lev‐Sagie A, Arad I. et al N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide concentrations in mothers just before delivery, in cord blood, and in newborns. Clin Chem 2005. 51926–927.927 [PubMed]
39. Schwachtgen L, Herrmann M, Georg T. et al Reference values of NT‐proBNP serum concentrations in the umbilical cord blood and in healthy neonates and children. Z Kardiol 2005. 94399–404.404 [PubMed]
40. Hammerer‐Lercher A, Mair J, Tews G. et al N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide concentrations are markedly higher in the umbilical cord blood of newborns than in their mothers. Clin Chem 2005. 51913–915.915 [PubMed]
41. Bakker J, Gies I, Slavenburg B. et al Reference values for N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide in umbilical cord blood. Clin Chem 2004. 502465 [PubMed]
42. Rauh M, Koch A. Plasma N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide concentrations in a control population of infants and children. Clin Chem 2003. 491563–1564.1564 [PubMed]
43. Flynn P A, da Graca R L, Auld P A. et al The use of a bedside assay for plasma B‐type natriuretic peptide as a biomarker in the management of patent ductus arteriosus in premature neonates. J Pediatr 2005. 14738–42.42 [PubMed]
44. Choi B M, Lee K H, Eun B L. et al Utility of rapid B‐type natriuretic peptide assay for diagnosis of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2005. 115255–261.261 [PubMed]
45. Holmstrom H, Omland T. Natriuretic peptides as markers of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Clin Sci (Lond) 2002. 10379–80.80 [PubMed]
46. Holmstrom H, Hall C, Thaulow E. Plasma levels of natriuretic peptides and hemodynamic assessment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2001. 90184–191.191 [PubMed]
47. Sanjeev S, Pettersen M, Lua J. et al Role of plasma B‐type natriuretic peptide in screening for hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates. J Perinatol 2005. 25709–713.713 [PubMed]
48. Mathew B, Russell J A, Steinhorn R H. et al B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) system in an ovine model of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) [abstract]. Pediatr Res 2006. 593875
49. Reynolds E W, Vranicar M, Bada H S. Recombinant human B‐Type natriuretic peptide for persistent pulmonary hypertension: a phase 1 study [abstract]. Pediatr Res 2006. 59556
50. Koulouri S, Acherman R J, Wong P C. et al Utility of B‐type natriuretic peptide in differentiating congestive heart failure from lung disease in pediatric patients with respiratory distress. Pediatr Cardiol 2004. 25341–346.346 [PubMed]
51. Witthaut R, Busch C, Fraunberger P. et al Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide are increased in septic shock: impact of interleukin‐6 and sepsis‐associated left ventricular dysfunction. Intensive Care Med 2003. 291696–1702.1702 [PubMed]
52. Rudiger A, Gasser S, Fischler M. et al Comparable increase of B‐type natriuretic peptide and amino‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with severe sepsis, septic shock, and acute heart failure. Crit Care Med 2006. 342140–2144.2144 [PubMed]
53. Ueda S, Nishio K, Akai Y. et al Prognostic value of increased plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with septic shock. Shock 2006. 26134–139.139 [PubMed]
54. Brueckmann M, Huhle G, Lang S. et al Prognostic value of plasma N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide in patients with severe sepsis. Circulation 2005. 112527–534.534 [PubMed]
55. Roch A, Allardet‐Servent J, Michelet P. et al NH2 terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide plasma level as an early marker of prognosis and cardiac dysfunction in septic shock patients. Crit Care Med 2005. 331001–1010.1010 [PubMed]
56. Fried I, Bar‐Oz B, Algur N. et al Comparison of N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide levels in critically ill children with sepsis versus acute left ventricular dysfunction. Pediatrics 2006. 118e1165–e1168.e1168 [PubMed]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group