PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Org Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 2.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2674648
NIHMSID: NIHMS99980

Application of Daugulis Copper-Catalyzed Direct Arylation to the Synthesis of 5-Aryl Benzotriazepines

Abstract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms99980u1.jpg

A method for the direct arylation of benzotriazepines is reported, employing an aryl iodide as the coupling partner, copper iodide as the catalyst, and lithium t-butoxide as the base. A variety of electron-rich, electron-poor, and sterically hindered aryl iodides are compatible with the reaction conditions. The arylation reaction can also be performed outside a glovebox in air without a significant decrease in yield. Furthermore, convenient microwave conditions for carrying out this transformation are reported.

Benzodiazepines and benzotriazepines are classes of non-aromatic heterocycles that have emerged as privileged pharmacophore stuctures due to their wide-ranging biological activities.1 Examples of well-known benzodiazepines include Valium (diazepam), Librium (chlordizepoxide), Xanax (alprazolam), and Ativan (lorazepam).2 In addition, a number of benzotriazepines are currently being evaluated in clinical trials.3 As a consequence, strategies for the rapid synthesis and functionalization of these classes of compounds are of considerable interest to both academic and industrial researchers.4

We have previously reported on the Rh-catalyzed direct functionalization of a range of nitrogen heterocycles,5 with many of these transformations documented to proceed via Rh-bound N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) intermediates. We speculated that benzodiazepines and triazepines should be capable of forming NHC-metal complexes, and were able to isolate and characterize a 1,4-benzodiazepine NHC-Rh complex.6 However, we were not able to achieve the Rh-catalyzed direct arylation of either 1,4-benzodiazepines or triazepines under a wide range of reaction conditions and therefore focused on alternative transition metal catalysts for the direct arylation of these classes of heterocycles. Herein we report that benzotriazepines can be efficiently arylated via Cu-catalysis.7,8

The direct arylation of benzotriazepine 1a was intially explored using copper catalysts according to the conditions reported by Daugulis and co-workers for the direct arylation of aromatic C-H bonds, CuI (10 mol %), LiOtBu (2 equiv), and PhI (3 equiv) in DMF at 140 °C.9,10 Under these conditions arylated product 2a was obtained in a promising 40% isolated yield (Table 1), although the reaction time necessary for complete conversion (12 h) (entry 1) was longer than that which Daugulis had reported for the arylation of azoles (10–30 min) (entry 2).

Table 1
Effect of Catalyst Loading and Temperaturea

To increase product yield we first examined catalyst loading and temperature (Table 1). The use of stoichiometric CuI resulted in quantitative conversion of the benzotriazepine 1a to the arylated product 2a (entries 4–5). Decreasing the amount of CuI negatively affects the yield of the arylated product, as does lowering the reaction temperature (entries 6–8). With the aim of developing a catalytic direct arylation, we chose 20 mol % of the copper catalyst and 140 °C for further evaluation of reaction parameters.

In this survey, we first examined the effect of copper source and the electrophilic coupling partner (Table 2). Without copper, no reaction was observed (entry 1). Interestingly, both Cu(I) and Cu(II) catalysts could be employed in this transformation. However, Cu(I) complexes tended to result in higher yields. Consistent with Daugulis’s observations for the arylation of aromatic heterocycles, only aryl iodides are effective coupling partners, with aryl bromides and chlorides giving little or no product (entries 9–10). This result suggests that this method should be useful for the chemoselective arylation at iodide-substituted centers when other halogen substituents are present (vide infra).

Table 2
Effect of Copper Source and Phenyl Halide Coupling Partnera

Upon examining different bases and solvents (Table 3), LiOtBu and DMF were found to be optimal. Stronger bases resulted in significantly lower yields as well as starting material decomposition (entries 2–4). Either no reaction or low conversion was observed when weaker bases were employed (entries 5–7). The mechanism of this direct arylation reaction is likely to be similar to that previously reported by Daugulis and co-workers for the Cu-catalyzed arylation of aromatic C-H bonds, wherein the base is necessary for deprotonation/metallation.9 Weaker bases such as K3PO4, which is effective for the direct arylation of azoles and polyfluoroarenes, did not work well for benzotriazepine substrates presumably due to the much higher pKa value of the benzotriazepine sp2 C-H bond. For this heterocycle class, the stronger base, LiOtBu, as well as prolonged reaction times, are apparently necessary for deprotonation/metallation. A variety of solvents were evaluated with LiOtBu as the base, and in all cases resulted in much poorer conversion relative to DMF (entries 8–11).

Table 3
Effect of Base and Solventa

Using the optimal reaction conditions the scope of the catalytic direct arylation reaction was next examined (Scheme 1). Benzotriazepine 1a could be successfully coupled to both electron-poor and electron-rich aryl iodides to give benzotriazepines 2g, 2h and 2j and benzotriazepines 2b, 2c, 2f and 2i, respectively. Ortho-substituted aryl iodides could also be coupled in high yields (benzotriazepines 2c and 2f). Good functional group compatibility was observed with alkoxy (2f), chloro (2h), nitro (2j), and pyridyl (2l) groups all being compatible with the reaction conditions. Although 2-iodopyridine coupled in only modest yields with 20 mol % CuI, the yield of 2l could be significantly improved by employing stoichiometric quantities of CuI. A vinyl iodide was also coupled (2k) with stoichiometric CuI resulting in a doubling of the yield relative to that obtained when 20 mol % CuI was used. The N-Bn-protected benzotriazepine substrate was also an effective reaction partner in this transformation (2m). In contrast, benzotriazepines with free N-H groups, e.g., 1 (R = H), are not effective substrates due to competitive N-arylation.

Scheme 1
Benzotriazepine Direct Arylation Substrate Scopea

We also found that this reaction can be conducted outside of the glovebox in air without significantly decreasing the yield of product (Scheme 2). Moreover, microwave irradiation could be used to shorten reaction times (Table 4). With this method of heating, one equiv of CuI is optimal, and at this stoichiometry, complete conversion is observed within 1 h at 140 °C (entry 5).

Scheme 2
Arylation Reaction Outside of Glovebox.
Table 4
Microwave Assisted Benzotriazepine Arylationa

In conclusion, we have developed an efficient Cu-catalyzed protocol for the direct arylation of benzotriazepines, a class of heterocycles that are actively being investigated as drug candidates. This is the first example of the copper-mediated coupling of non-aromatic heterocycles. The transformation can be conducted either under inert atmosphere or in air and can be conveniently performed using microwave irradation. Further studies to expand substrate scope to benzodiazepines and other benzazepine derivatives are currently underway.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIH grant GM069559 (to J.A.E.) and by the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences Division, US Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 (to R.G.B.). We thank Dr. Ashley M. Berman (University of California Berkeley) for helpful discussions.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Full experimental details and characterization for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

1. (a) Evans BE, Rittle KE, Bock MG, DiPardo RM, Freidinger RM, Whitter WL, Lundell GF, Veber DF, Anderson PS. J Med Chem. 1988;31:2235. [PubMed] (b) Patchett AA, Nargund RP. Ann Rep Med Chem. 2000;35:289.
2. For recent reviews see: (1) Leonard BE. Hum Psycopharmacol Clin Exp. 1999;14:125. (2) Fryer RI. The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds. Chapter 7 Wiley; New York: 1991. Bicyclic Diazepines.
3. (a) McDonald IM, Austin C, Buck IM, Dunstone DJ, Gaffen J, Griffin E, Harper EA, Hull RAD, Kalindjian B, Linney ID, Low CMR, Patel D, Pether MJ, Raynor M, Roberts SP, Shaxted ME, Spencer J, Steel KOM, Sykes DA, Wright PT, Xun W. J Med Chem. 2007;50:4789. [PubMed] (b) McDonald IM, Black JW, Buck IM, Dunstone DJ, Griffin EP, Haper EA, Hull RAD, Kalindjian B, Lilley EJ, Linney ID, Pater MJ, Roberts SP, Shaxted ME, Spencer J, Steel KIM, Sykes DA, Walker MK, Watt GF, Wright L, Wright PT, Xun W. J Med Chem. 2007;50:3101. [PubMed]
4. For recent references see: (a) Bunin BA, Ellman JA. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:10997. (b) Tucker H, Le Count DJ. In: Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II. Katrizky AR, Rees CW, Scriven EFV, editors. Vol. 9. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1996. p. 151. (c) del Pozo C, Macias A, Alonso E, Gonzalez J. Synthesis. 2004;16:2697. (d) Neamati N, Turpin JA, Winslow HE, Chrisensen JL, Williamson K, Orr A, Rice WG, Pommier Y, Garofalo A, Brizzi A, Campiani G, Fiorini I, Nacci VJ. J Med Chem. 1999;42:3334. [PubMed] (e) Nadin A, Sanchez Lopez JM, Owens AP, Howells DM, Talbot AC, Harrison T. J Org Chem. 2003;68:2844. [PubMed] (f) Spencer J, Chowdhry BZ, Mallet AI, Rathnam RP, Adatia T, Bashall A, Rominger F. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:6082.
5. (a) Lewis JC, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1013. [PubMed] (b) Lewis JC, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5332. [PubMed] (c) Berman AM, Lewis JC, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14926. [PubMed]
6. Gribble MW, Ellman JA, Bergman RG. Organometallics. 2008;27:2152. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. For recent reviews on C-H functionalization of heterocycles: (a) Alberico D, Scott ME, Lautens M. Chem Rev. 2007;107:174. [PubMed] (b) Seregin IV, Gevorgyan V. Chem Soc Rev. 2007;36:1173. [PubMed] (c) Campeau L-C, Fragnou K. Chem Commun. 2006:1253. [PubMed]
8. See supporting information for experimental details of substrate preparation and screening of reaction conditions.
9. (a) Do H-Q, Kashif Khan RM, Daugulis O. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:15185. [PubMed] (b) Do HQ, Daugulis O. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:1128. [PubMed] (c) Do HQ, Daugulis O. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12404. [PubMed]
10. For other reports on copper-catalyzed and copper-mediated C-H bond functionalization and C-C bond formation of heterocycles: (a) Besselievre F, Piguel S, Mahuteau-Betzer F, Grierson DS. Org Lett. 2008;10:4029. [PubMed] (b) Yoshizumi T, Tsurugi H, Satoh T, Miura M. Tet Lett. 2008;49:1598.