PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cancer Cell. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 7.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2673492
NIHMSID: NIHMS99362

Rak functions as a tumor suppressor by regulating PTEN protein stability and function

Summary

Expression of PTEN tumor suppressor is frequently lost in breast cancer in the absence of mutation or promoter methylation through as yet undetermined mechanisms. In this study, we demonstrated that the Rak tyrosine kinase physically interacts with PTEN and phosphorylates PTEN on Tyr 336. The knockdown of Rak enhanced the binding of PTEN to its E3 ligase, NEDD4-1, and promoted PTEN polyubiquitination, leading to PTEN protein degradation. Notably, ectopic expression of Rak effectively suppressed breast cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and colony formation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, Rak knockdown was sufficient to transform normal mammary epithelial cells. Therefore, Rak acts as a bona fide tumor suppressor gene through the mechanism of regulating PTEN protein stability and function.

Introduction

The PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10) tumor suppressor gene located at chromosome 10q23 is frequently mutated in a number of tumor lineages, including glioblastoma, melanoma, and carcinomas of prostate, breast, and endometrium (Li et al., 1997; Li and Sun, 1997; Steck et al., 1997). PTEN antagonizes the actions of phosphoinositide 3-kinase by dephosphorylating the second messenger, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5,-trisphosphate (Cantley and Neel, 1999; Di Cristofano and Pandolfi, 2000; Maehama et al., 2001; Wishart and Dixon, 2002), regulating activation of the kinase Akt as well as the downstream cellular survival and growth responses (Bellacosa et al., 1991; Chang et al., 1997; Jimenez et al., 1998; Staal, 1987). PTEN has phosphatase, C2, and PDZ-binding domains as well as potential sites of regulation by phosphorylation, including tyrosine phosphorylation, which may contribute to its ability to modulate cell growth and viability.

In addition to gene deletion or mutation, emerging evidence shows that complete or partial loss of PTEN protein expression can impact tumor suppression (Salmena et al., 2008). Indeed, PTEN protein levels are reduced in at least 50% of breast cancer though gene mutations are rare (Hennessy et al, 2005, Brugge et al., 2007, Stemke-Hale et al 2008). The epigenetic regulation of PTEN expression has been attributed to transcriptional regulation, microRNA and/or alteration of PTEN protein stability (Salmena et al, 2008). The disruption of PTEN protein stability represents a particularly attractive yet elusive mechanism contributing to its loss in human cancer. Numerous reports have suggested that PTEN stability is regulated by interaction with other proteins and that it is subject to post-translational modification, particularly phosphorylation (Salmena et al., 2008). To better understand the regulation of PTEN phosphorylation, stability and function, we used a proteomics-based approach to systematically identify PTEN-binding proteins.

Rak is a 54-kDa tyrosine kinase that belongs to a family of Src kinases (Anneren et al., 2003; Cance et al., 1994; Serfas and Tyner, 2003). Like all members of the Src kinase family, the Rak kinase possesses an SH domain as well as conserved autoregulatory tyrosine residues in its catalytic domain (Anneren et al., 2003; Cance et al., 1994; Serfas and Tyner, 2003). However, Rak differs significantly from the other family members in many structural features, including the presence of a putative bipartite nuclear localization signal and the lack of a consensus myristoylation motif (Anneren et al., 2003; Serfas and Tyner, 2003). In fact, Rak has been shown to be a nuclear protein with growth-inhibitory effects when ectopically expressed in breast cancer cells (Meyer et al., 2003). Notably, the Rak gene is located on chromosome 6q21-23, a region that undergoes loss of heterozygosity in 30% of breast cancer cases (Sheng et al., 1996). However, the mechanisms by which Rak and its substrates function in cancer have remained unexplored. In this study, we demonstrated the functional interaction between Rak and PTEN, and provided mechanistic evidence supporting Rak functions as a bona fide breast tumor suppressor gene.

Results

Rak Is a PTEN-interacting Protein

To systematically identify proteins involved in regulation of PTEN phosphorylation and/or protein turnover, we carried out immunoaffinity purification followed by mass spectrometry. We demonstrated that the Rak tyrosine kinase represents one of the major PTEN-associated proteins (Figure 1A). To validate the mass spectrometry result, we performed immunoprecipitation-Western blot analysis and found that PTEN coprecipitates with Rak (Figure 1B, left panel). Reciprocally, Rak could also be pulled down when an antibody against PTEN was used for immunoprecipitation (Figure 1B, right panel). This result strongly suggests that endogenous PTEN and Rak physically interact.

Figure 1
Rak binds to PTEN and regulates PTEN protein stability

To map the binding domain on Rak, we expressed Flag-tagged wild-type Rak and Rak mutants lacking an SH2 domain (Rak-ΔSH2) or an SH3 domain (Rak-ΔSH3) in U2OS cells. We found that PTEN coprecipitated with wild-type Rak and Rak-ΔSH2, but PTEN binding to Rak-ΔSH3 was much reduced (Figure 1C). We also created three PTEN mutants, PTEN Δ1-185, PTEN Δ185-352, and PTEN Δ353-403. As shown in Figure 1D, Rak coprecipitated with wild-type PTEN, PTEN Δ353-403, and weakly with PTEN Δ1-185. However, Rak did not bind to PTEN Δ185-352. These results provide evidence that the binding of Rak and PTEN is mediated through the interaction between SH3 domain of Rak, and the C2 domain (maybe phosphatase domain as well) of PTEN.

Previous studies implicated both Rak and PTEN in breast cancer. We therefore further evaluated the correlation between Rak and PTEN protein expression in breast cancer tissues by linear correlation analysis. Among the 42 cases analyzed, Rak expression showed a strong positive correlation with that of PTEN (32 cases, 76.19%) (R2 = 0.8039, p < 0.01) (Figure 1E). High expression of Rak but low expression of PTEN was detected in 7 cases (16.67%), possibly due to PTEN deletion or mutation in breast cancer. There were only 3 cases that showed low expression of Rak but high expression of PTEN (Figure 1E). This data suggests a potential link between expression of PTEN and Rak in breast cancer cells.

Rak Regulates PTEN Protein Stability

Next, we sought to determine if there is a causal relationship between Rak status and PTEN protein levels. To this end, we established two Rak-overexpressing MCF7 breast cancer cell lines (Rak 44 and Rak 45, Figure 1F, left panel) and three stable Rak-knockdown non-tumorigenic MCF10A cell lines (Rak KD1, Rak KD2, and Rak KD3, Figure 1F, right panel). Interestingly, we found that Rak positively regulated PTEN protein expression without affecting PTEN mRNA levels (Figure 1G). PTEN protein expression was significantly increased in the Rak-overexpressing MCF7 cells and was abolished in the Rak-knockdown MCF10A cells.

We further tested whether PTEN activity and levels of its downstream targets were also affected by enforced changes in Rak levels. As shown in Figure 1H, top left panel, the lipid phosphatase activity of PTEN was increased by 60% when Rak was ectopically expressed in MCF7 cells, suggesting that Rak enhances the capacity of PTEN to dephosphorylate PtdIns. Consistently, Rak overexpression increased the inhibitory effects of PTEN on downstream targets in the PI3K pathway. We found that overexpression of Rak reduced Akt phosphorylation (Figure 1H, top right panel) and repressed β-catenin nuclear localization and activity as indicated by reporter constructs that contained three repeats of wild-type (TOP) or mutant (FOP) Tcf4 (T cell factor)-binding sites (Figure 1H, bottom). PTEN has previously been shown to inhibit nuclear β-catenin accumulation as well as β-catenin transactivation activity (Persad et al, 2001).

Thus this data indicates that enforced Rak expression increases PTEN activity, reducing Akt phosphorylation and blocking its downstream signaling. It is worthwhile to note that the MCF7 cells used in our study express the wild-type Akt and therefore are very suitable for the purpose of this study.

Since Rak binds to PTEN and positively regulates PTEN protein expression, we suspected that Rak might regulate PTEN protein stability. To test this possibility, we compared PTEN protein turnover between control and Rak-knockdown cells in the presence of cycloheximide (CHX), which blocks protein synthesis. As shown in Figure 1I, Rak knockdown clearly led to a reduced the half-life of PTEN protein from more than 24 hours to less than 6 hours, indicating an essential role of Rak in the stabilization of PTEN protein. Overexpression of Rak also increased the half-life of PTEN in other cell lines, such as U2OS cells used above (Suppl. Figure 1A).

PTEN Ubiquitination Is Accelerated in the Absence of Rak

To determine if Rak regulates PTEN protein stability through the proteasomal pathway, we treated control and Rak-knockdown cells with 10 μM of the proteasome inhibitor MG132. MG132 treatment substantially increased PTEN protein levels in Rak-knockdown cells but only slightly increased PTEN expression levels in control cells (Figure 2A), indicating that Rak protects PTEN from proteasomal-dependent degradation.

Figure 2
Ubiquitination of PTEN is accelerated in the absence of Rak

It has recently been reported that PTEN protein levels are, in part, regulated by proteosomal degradation through the ubiquitin ligase NEDD4-1 (Wang et al., 2007). To investigate whether Rak regulates PTEN ubiquitination, we performed an in vivo ubiquitination assay. First, MCF7 cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding Flag-tagged Rak, His-tagged PTEN, HA-tagged ubiquitin, and/or combinations of control vectors. The expressed His-tagged PTEN was then pulled down from cell lysates with Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin. Subsequently, Western blotting against HA-tag was performed to detect ubiquitinated PTEN. As predicted, in the absence of ectopic expression of Rak, PTEN protein was heavily ubiquitinated, with a characteristic ladder indicative of polyubiquitination (Figure 2B, lane 6); in the presence of Rak, PTEN ubiquitination was decreased (Figure 2B, lane 5). Consistently, we also found that PTEN polyubiquitination was increased in the absence of Rak in MCF10A cells and that the treatment of cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 caused a robust increase of polyubiquitinated PTEN protein (Figure 2C).

In support of a role for Rak in PTEN polyubiquitination, we demonstrated that Rak altered the binding of PTEN with its E3 ligase, NEDD4-1. As shown in Figure 2D, Rak knockdown in MCF10A cells resulted in a substantial increase in the association between endogenous PTEN and NEDD4-1 as indicated by coimmunoprecipitation. Furthermore, PTEN polyubiquitination was significantly decreased in the absence of NEDD4-1 (Figure 2E. lane 2 vs. 6). Together, our findings strongly indicate that Rak stabilizes PTEN protein through blocking ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation, likely through reducing PTEN binding to NEDD4-1.

Rak Phosphorylates PTEN on Tyrosine Residue 336

In light of our finding that PTEN is a binding partner of Rak, we determined whether PTEN is a Rak substrate. In an in vitro kinase assay, Rak could indeed induce PTEN phosphorylation (Figure 3A). Consistently, using a phosphotyrosine antibody, we confirmed the phosphorylation of endogenous PTEN in MCF7 cells stably overexpressing Rak (Figure 3B). Interestingly, when we tested several PTEN mutants in which tyrosine residues that could play a role in the interaction of PTEN with the membrane were mutated, we found that mutation of Y336 abolished the phosphorylation of PTEN by Rak. Furthermore, a kinase-dead Rak mutant was unable to phosphorylate PTEN (Figure 3C), suggesting that Rak may directly phosphorylate PTEN in intact cells.

Figure 3
Rak phosphorylates PTEN on Tyr 336 to prevent its protein degradation

Phosphorylation of Tyr 336 Residue by Rak is Required for Maintenance of PTEN Protein Stability

Our studies indicated that Tyr 336 of PTEN is required for PTEN phosphorylation by Rak. To explore the functional significance of this phosphorylation, we ectopically expressed either wild-type or Y336F-mutant PTEN in cells and measured protein half-lives. As shown in Figure 3D, Y336F-mutant PTEN was present at a moderately lower level than wild-type PTEN. Furthermore, when cells were treated with CHX, Y336F-mutant PTEN had a half-life of less than 4 hours compared to greater than 24 hours for wild-type PTEN (Figure 3D). Furthermore, Y336F-mutant PTEN levels were markedly increased by treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Figure 3E). Consistent with the lack of phosphorylation by Rak, the association between Y336F-mutant PTEN and its E3 ligase, NEDD4-1 was significantly increased (Figure 3F).

To determine if phosphorylation on Y336 by Rak is functionally important, we compared the phosphatase activity and the growth-inhibitory effect of ectopically expressed wild-type and Y336F-mutant PTEN on PTEN-deleted MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells (mutant PTEN) with or without knockdown of the endogenous Rak gene. As shown in Figure 3G, top panel, we successfully generated stable Rak-knockdown MDA-MB-468 clones, Rak KD1 and Rak KD3. We then stably expressed either wild-type or Y336F-mutant PTEN in the individual Rak KD1 and Rak KD3 MDA-MB-468 clones. As shown in the Figure 3G, lower panel, the protein level of Y336F mutant was lower than that of wild-type PTEN in control MDA-MB-468 cells. The lower level of Y336F mutant was due to its reduced protein stability which could be rescued by adding the proteasome inhibitor, MG132 (Suppl. Figure 2). Moreover, knockdown of Rak resulted in decreased levels of wild-type PTEN protein without detectable effects on the level of Y336F mutant PTEN, supporting a critical role of Rak in stabilizing PTEN through phosphorylation of Y336. Also, as expected, cells expressing Y336F-mutant PTEN exhibited significantly lower phosphatase activity compared to cells expressing wild-type PTEN (Figure 3H). Together the data indicate that phosphorylation of PTEN on Tyr 336 by Rak is required for optimal protein stability.

In control MDA-MB-468 cells, ectopic expression of wild-type PTEN significantly inhibited cell proliferation. In contrast, the Y336F mutant exerted a less growth-inhibitory effect consistent with its low level of expression. Strikingly, the growth-inhibitory effect of wild-type PTEN was reversed when Rak was knocked down in the cells (Figure 3I). Together, these results suggested that phosphorylation on Y336 by Rak prevents PTEN degradation; loss of Rak markedly decreased the ability of PTEN to inhibit tumor cell growth.

Rak Suppresses Tumorigenicity of Human Breast Cancer Cells

Since we found that Rak regulates the stability of PTEN protein and that mutation of the Rak phosphorylation site on PTEN decreases the growth-inhibitory effect of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene, we posited that Rak might function as a tumor suppressor gene. To test this possibility, we first examined the phenotypic characteristics of cells ectopically expressing Rak. Interestingly, we observed marked morphologic differences between Rak-overexpressing MCF7 stable cells and control cells. Whereas the control cells were rounded, Rak-overexpressing cells (Rak 44 and Rak 45) cells developed more stellate shape closer to the morphology of normal breast cells (Figure 4A). Moreover, overexpression of Rak repressed proliferation (Figure 4B) and growth in soft agar of MCF7 cells (Figure 4C) as well as of other cell lines, such as U2OS cells used above (Suppl. 1B and 1C). Rak overexpression also suppressed tumor cell invasion in a Matrigel invasion assay that mimics the extracellular matrix in vivo (Figure 4D).

Figure 4
Rak suppresses tumorigenicity of MCF7 breast cancer cells

Given that Rak effectively suppressed phenotypes associated with in vitro transformation, we investigated the effect of Rak expression in a xenograft mouse model. Mice were injected in the mammary glands with Rak-overexpressing MCF7 cells or vector control MCF7 cells and monitored weekly for tumor formation. By week 8, all 10 of the mice injected with Rak-overexpressing clones remained tumor free, whereas all 5 of the control mice had developed tumors (Table 1 and Figure 4E).

Table 1
Tumorigenicity of orthotopically implanted control and Rak-overexpressing MCF7 cells

Rak Knockdown Transforms Normal Mammary Epithelial Cells

As shown above, Rak overexpression suppressed invasion and proliferation of breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. To further assess whether Rak is a bona fide breast tumor suppressor gene, we sought to determine if loss of Rak expression would transform normal mammary epithelial cells.

Transformation activity in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo were evaluated using the three Rak-knockdown MCF10A cell lines described above. Rak knockdown promoted cell proliferation (Figure 5A), anchorage-independent growth (Figure 5B), and in vitro invasive potential (Figure 5C). Notably, when Rak was depleted in MDA-MB-468 (PTEN mutant) cells, its effects on proliferation and anchorage-independent growth was less evident (Figure 3I and Suppl. Figure 3), suggesting PTEN is one of the major targets mediating Rak suppression of cell transformation.

Figure 5
Loss of Rak transforms MCF10A cells and induces their tumorigenicity

We also investigated whether Rak knockdown in MCF10A cells would allow tumor formation in xenografts. We injected control cells or individual Rak-knockdown clones into mammary glands of nude mice and monitored tumor growth. Notably, all mice injected with Rak-knockdown cells but none of the mice injected with control vector expressing cells had developed tumors within 3 weeks after injection (Table 2 and Figure 5D). Pathologic analysis of the tumors revealed micropapillary hyperplasia in Rak-knockdown clones (Figure 5E). These results demonstrated that loss of Rak is sufficient to induce tumorigenicity in immortalized normal mammary epithelial cells, supporting a role for Rak as a bona fide tumor suppressor in breast cancer.

Table 2
Tumorigenicity of orthotopically implanted control and Rak-deficient MCF10A cells

Discussion

Previous studies have demonstrated that tumor-associated PTEN mutations frequently leads to loss of PTEN protein with at least 20% of the cases demonstrating high mRNA levels indicative of rapid degradation of mutant PTEN protein in cells (Georgescu et al., 1999). In fact, PTEN tyrosine mutants, with an associated loss of PTEN protein and tumor suppressor activity, have been detected in many types of cancer. However, little is known about the mechanisms that regulate PTEN protein stability and whether the molecules regulating PTEN stability also function as tumor suppressor genes in human cancer. In this study, we have found that expression of Rak, a PTEN-interacting protein, strongly correlated with PTEN protein levels in breast cancer tissues, and we demonstrated that Rak positively regulates PTEN protein stability through phosphorylation of PTEN on Tyr 336, which in turn prevents PTEN from ubiquitination and degradation.

Recent studies have shown that PTEN protein stability is regulated by ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation through the E3 ligase NEDD4-1. As with PTEN stability, the mechanisms regulating NEDD4-1 and PTEN association have not been fully elucidated. Since Rak enhances PTEN stability, we suspected that phosphorylation of NEDD4-1 or PTEN by Rak might disrupt the interaction between these two molecules and, in turn, stabilize PTEN protein. In our studies, we found that Rak efficiently phosphorylates PTEN on Tyr 336 but has no detectable kinase activity toward NEDD4-1 (data not presented). Notably, Rak depletion increased the interaction between NEDD4-1 and PTEN, suggesting that phosphorylation of PTEN by Rak may inhibit PTEN binding to NEDD4-1 and subsequent PTEN degradation. Indeed negative regulation of the binding between E3 ligase and substrate as a consequence of tyrosine phosphorylation has previously been reported. For example, Fyn was shown to phosphorylate the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch and reduce its binding to and degradation of its substrate JunB (Yang et al., 2006). Notably, Fyn and Rak belong to the same kinase family, and Itch is a HECT-type E3 ligase, just like NEDD4-1. Thus the regulatory mechanisms are similar except that Rak phosphorylates the substrate whereas Fyn phosphorylates the E3 ligase. It is tempting to speculate that tyrosine phosphorylation may be a common mechanism for regulation of protein stability, in which tyrosine kinases protect substrates from HECT-mediated degradation. This mechanism is in contrast to the one where serine/threonine kinases promote F-Box-containing E3 ligase-mediated ubiquitination and protein degradation.

In addition to uncovering a mechanism that regulates PTEN protein stability, as illustrated in Figure 6, our studies also identified Rak as having the potential to act as a tumor suppressor gene in breast cancer. Rak is located a region that undergoes loss of heterozygosity in 30% of breast cancer cases. However, the role of Rak in breast cancer development is far from clear. Although we identified PTEN as an important substrate for Rak and one that may play crucial role in Rak’s tumor suppressor function, we cannot rule out the possibility that Rak may also suppress tumor growth through PTEN-independent pathway. PTEN has been reported to play fundamental roles in the maintenance of chromosomal stability as well as stem cell biology. Thus, we speculate that Rak may also participate in these two important biological functions. In fact, our preliminary studies implicate Rak in preventing spontaneous DNA damage (data not shown). Thus we will determine how Rak regulates genomic integrity and whether Rak is involved in “stemness” of cells in future studies.

Figure 6
Schematic model of how Rak phosphorylates PTEN and protects PTEN from ubiquitin-mediated degradation

Experimental procedures

Cell Culture and Plasmids

U2OS cells and breast cancer cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The U2OS cells were maintained in McCoy’s 5A medium (Cellgro, Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% FBS with glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin. MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS. MCF7 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)/Nutrient Mixture F12 (Cellgro Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% FBS. MCF10A cells were maintained in mammary epithelial growth medium (Clonetics), a proprietary serum-free medium containing insulin, hydrocortisone, epidermal growth factor, and bovine pituitary extract. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

The pCMV5-3×Flag vector encoding Rak was provided by Dr. Meric-Bernstam. The K262R point mutation was created from 3×Flag-Rak using the GeneTailor Site-Directed Mutagenesis System (Invitrogen). The Rak deletion mutants Rak-SH2Δ and Rak-SH3Δ (Meyer et al., 2003) were provided by Dr. Craven. pCMV5-3×Flag and pCMV5-3×Flag-PTEN, -PTENY68F, -PTENY240F, -PTENY315F, and -PTENY336F were provided by Dr. Mills. The PTEN deletion mutants were carried out by PCR (see Figure 1D). His-PTEN (883 pET15b PTEN) was purchased from Addgene (Cambridge, MA). A full-length NEDD4-1 cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and subcloned into pGEX-5T-3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The identity of all plasmids was confirmed by sequencing at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center’s DNA Core Sequencing Facility.

Antibodies and Reagents

Nucleotides 448-1433 was subcloned into pGEX-4T with sense primer TTTTGGATCCATGAGCAACATcTGTCAGAGG, and antisense primer TTTTCTCGAGTTTCACTGCTACTGGAGTGGT and the protein product was used for immunization for rabbit polyclonal anti-Rak antibody (Proteintech Group Inc, Chicago, IL). Anti-PTEN antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-Flag M2 and anti-β-actin were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). CHX (cycloheximide) was obtained from Sigma and used at 10μg/ml (MCF10A cells) or 40μg/ml (U2OS cells); MG132 (carbobenzoxy-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-leucine) was obtained from EMD Biosciences (San Diego) and used at 10 μM.

Affinity purification of PTEN protein complex

U2OS cells were transiently transfected with empty vector or Flag-PTEN plasmids. Forty-eight hours later, whole cellular extracts were prepared with RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1% NP40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM NaF) and immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (Sigma) overnight. Bead-bound immunocomplexes were eluted with 3×Flag peptide and subjected to SDS-PAGE. The silver staining was performed with SilverSNA kit for Mass spectrometry (Pierce). Specific bands were excised, digested and the peptides were analyzed by a mass spectrometry analysis at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Proteomic Facility.

Preparation of Recombinant Proteins

The plasmids pGEX-5T-3-Rak and -NEDD4-1 were used to express recombinant GST-Rak and NEDD4-1 in Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3). The GST fusion proteins were expressed by induction overnight at 25°C with 0.1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside in BL21 strain and purified using glutathione-sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The plasmid pET 15b PTEN-His was transformed into BL21 strain. The recombinant proteins were expressed and purified by Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography according to standard procedures. The plasmids 3×Flag-Rak, -RakK262R, -PTEN, PTENY68F, PTENY240F, PTENY315F, and PTENY336F were transfected into 293T cells, and fusion proteins were purified using a FLAG fusion protein immunoprecipitation kit (Sigma).

Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction

cDNA was transcribed using SuperSCRIPT III (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Rak was polymerase chain reaction-amplified using the following primers: ATGAGCAACATCTGTCAGA and TCATCTTATGAAGTTATTTGC. For amplification of PTEN, primers GGACGAACTGGTGTAATGATATG and TCTACTGTTTTTGTGAAGTACAGC were used.

RNA Interference

Rak knockdown was achieved by RNA interference using a lentiviral vector-based MISSION shRNA (Sigma). Lentiviral particles corresponding to the MISSION shRNA Rak-U22322 target set were used as well as the MISSION Nontarget shRNA control. Specificity and efficacy of the shRNA Rak procedure were controlled by Western blotting, after transduction and puromycin selection in MCF10A cells. The shRNA against NEDD4-1 was purchased from OpenBiosystem.

Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation

Cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and cellular proteins were extracted in modified RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1% NP40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM NaF) for 30 min at 4°C. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation, and proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis. Membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline–0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T)–5% (wt/vol) milk for 1 hr at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies diluted in TBS-T–5% (wt/vol) milk for 2 hr at room temperature. Subsequently, membranes were washed with TBS-T and incubated with horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (1:4,000) (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) diluted in TBS-T–5% skim milk. Membranes were washed in TBS-T, and bound antibody was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).

Immunoprecipitation was performed by incubating the lysates from 5×106 cells with 1 μg of antibody at 4°C overnight, followed by addition of 30 μl of protein A/G-conjugated agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The precipitates were washed four times with ice-cold PBS, resuspended in 6×Laemmli buffer, and resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting.

PTEN Lipid Phosphatase Assay

Cells were lysed in 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100 with protease inhibitors. PTEN was immunoprecipitated by rabbit anti-PTEN antibody. The immunoprecipitates were washed and incubated with water-soluble diC8PtdIns 3,4,5-trisphosphate (Echelon Research Laboratories) in 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM DTT at 37°C for 40 min. The supernatant was collected after the reaction and incubated with Biomol Green Reagent (Biomol) at room temperature for 30 min. PTEN activity was measured by colorimetric detection at OD650 nm of the release of phosphate.

In Vitro Proliferation Assay

Cells were assayed for MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] (Sigma) reduction, a measure of mitochondrial viability. In brief, cells were harvested from exponential phase cultures growing in culture medium, counted, and plated in 96-well flat-bottomed microtiter plates (200 μl cell suspensions, 1×104 cells/ml). Seventy-two hours later, cells were incubated with MTT substrate (20 mg/ml) for 4 hr, the culture medium was removed, and DMSO was added. The optical density was measured spectrophotometrically at 550 nm. Each experiment was repeated at least three times.

Soft Agar Assay

Cells were resuspended in DMEM containing 0.5% low-melting agarose (Sigma, type VII) and 10% FBS and seeded onto a coating of 1% low-melting agarose in DMEM containing 10% FBS. Colonies were scored 3 weeks after preparation. Colonies larger than ~ 0.1 mm in diameter were scored as positive.

Invasion Assay

Invasion assays were carried out using a cell invasion assay kit (Chemicon) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the assay was done in an invasion chamber consisting of a 24-well tissue culture plate with 12 cell culture inserts. A cell suspension in serum-free culture medium was added to the inserts, and each insert was placed in the lower chamber containing 10% FBS culture medium. After 72 hr incubation in a cell culture incubator, invasiveness was evaluated by staining of cells that had migrated through the extracellular matrix layer and clung to the polycarbonate membrane at the bottom of the insert.

Tumor Growth in Nude Mice

Six-week-old female nude mice were used for experiments. All animal studies were conducted compliance with an animal protocol approved by the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Before injection of estrogen receptor–positive MCF7 cells (but not MCF10A), mice were implanted s.c. with 0.72 mg 17-β-estradiol 60-day release pellet (E2 pellet; Innovative Research of America). Mice were injected in the mammary gland with 5 × 106 cells in 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline from various cell lines. After 1 week, tumors were measured every 2 days. Each cell line was tested in five different animals.

For immunohistochemistry, tumor tissue samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and processed for histopathologic evaluation by paraffin embedding and hematoxylin and eosin staining.

Transfection and In Vivo Ubiquitination Assay

Cell culture transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). For in vivo PTEN-ubiquitination assay, transfection was performed when MCF7 cells in 10-cm plates reached ~90% confluence. Plasmids encoding for PTEN, Rak, and HA-tagged ubiquitin were used in transfection in individual experiments. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were harvested, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, pelleted, and lysed in RIPA buffer. Then the cell lysates were subjected to affinity purification with Ni2+ resin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to precipitate His-tagged PTEN with the resin. These precipitated PTEN proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by immunoblotting with anti-HA antibody.

In Vitro Kinase Assay

The kinase reactions were done by mixing purified His-PTEN with or without purified Rak in kinase assay buffer containing 10 µCi of [γ-32P] ATP, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 1.2 mM MnCl2, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 20 μM ATP for 20 min at 30°C. Reactions were terminated by adding SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiling at 100°C for 5 min. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane for exposure to x-ray film.

Analysis of PTEN and Rak Expression in Breast Cancer Samples

The proteins in forty-two breast cancer tissue samples obtained from the institutional breast cancer bank were extracted by RIPA buffer and analyzed for their expression of Rak and PTEN. After Western blotting analysis, the intensity of Rak and PTEN bands were quantitated and the relationships between Rak and PTEN protein expression were analyzed by linear regression. Any P value < 0.05 was considered significant. This study was performed according to protocols approved by the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board and all subjects provided written informed consent.

Acknowledgments

We thank Q. Yu of the Department of Systems Biology and M.-J. Kim of Department of Pathology for technical assistance. We also thank Z. Lu of Department of Neuro-Oncology for his advice on kinase assay, and S. Siwko of the Department of Systems Biology and S. Deming of the Department of Scientific Publications at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center for editorial assistance. This work was supported by NCI grant R01 CA120960 to S.-Y. Lin, NIH grant 1K08-CA91895-01 to F.M-B.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Significance

PTEN protein is frequently absent in cancer, particularly breast cancer, despite a lack of gene mutation. The mechanism causing PTEN protein loss has not been defined. We demonstrate that Rak tyrosine kinase phosphorylates PTEN, protecting it from ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Surprisingly, Rak exhibited strong tumor suppressive activity in vitro and in vivo, at least in part, through regulating PTEN protein stability. Thus, Rak may function as a tumor suppressor gene and further understanding of its function may contribute to effective therapeutic approaches for both Rak and PTEN defective cancers.

References

  • Anneren C, Lindholm CK, Kriz V, Welsh M. The FRK/RAK-SHB signaling cascade: a versatile signal-transduction pathway that regulates cell survival, differentiation and proliferation. Curr Mol Med. 2003;3:313–324. [PubMed]
  • Bellacosa A, Testa JR, Staal SP, Tsichlis PN. A retroviral oncogene, akt, encoding a serine-threonine kinase containing an SH2-like region. Science. 1991;254:274–277. [PubMed]
  • Brugge J, Hung MC, Mills GB. A new mutational AKTivation in the PI3K pathway. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:104–107. [PubMed]
  • Cance WG, Craven RJ, Bergman M, Xu L, Alitalo K, Liu ET. Rak, a novel nuclear tyrosine kinase expressed in epithelial cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1994;5:1347–1355. [PubMed]
  • Cantley LC, Neel BG. New insights into tumor suppression: PTEN suppresses tumor formation by restraining the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4240–4245. [PubMed]
  • Chang HW, Aoki M, Fruman D, Auger KR, Bellacosa A, Tsichlis PN, Cantley LC, Roberts TM, Vogt PK. Transformation of chicken cells by the gene encoding the catalytic subunit of PI3-kinase. Science. 1997;276:1848–1850. [PubMed]
  • Di Cristofano A, Pandolfi PP. The multiple roles of PTEN in tumor suppression. Cell. 2000;100:387–390. [PubMed]
  • Georgescu MM, Kirsch KH, Akagi T, Shishido T, Hanafusa H. The tumor-suppressor activity of PTEN is regulated by its carboxyl-terminal region. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;31:10182–10187. [PubMed]
  • Hennessy BT, Smith DL, Ram PT, Lu Y, Mills GB. Exploiting the PI3K/AKT pathway for cancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:988–1004. [PubMed]
  • Jimenez C, Jones DR, Rodriguez-Viciana P, Gonzalez-Garcia A, Leonardo E, Wennstrom S, von Kobbe C, Toran JLR, Borlado L, Calvo V. Identification and characterization of a new oncogene derived from the regulatory subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. EMBO J. 1998;17:743–753. [PubMed]
  • Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, Podsypanina K, Bose S, Wang SI, Puc J, Miliaresis C, Rodgers L, McCombie R, et al. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science. 1997;275:1943–1947. [PubMed]
  • Li DM, Sun H. TEP1, encoded by a candidate tumor suppressor locus, is a novel protein tyrosine phosphatase regulated by transforming growth factor beta. Cancer Res. 1997;57:2124–2129. [PubMed]
  • Maehama T, Taylor GS, Dixon JE. PTEN and myotubularin: novel phosphoinositide phosphatases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:247–279. [PubMed]
  • Meyer T, Xu L, Chang J, Liu ET, Craven RJ, Cance WG. Breast cancer cell line proliferation blocked by the Src-related Rak tyrosine kinase. Int J Cancer. 2003;104:139–146. [PubMed]
  • Persad S, Troussard AA, McPhee TR, Mulholland DJ, Dedhar S. Tumor suppressor PTEN inhibits nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin and T cell/lymphoid enhancer factor 1-mediated transcriptional activation. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:1161–1174. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Salmena L, Carracedo A, Pandolfi PP. Tenets of PTEN tumor suppressor. Cell. 2008;133:403–414. [PubMed]
  • Serfas MS, Tyner AL. Brk, Srm, Frk, and Src42A form a distinct family of intracellular Src-like tyrosine kinases. Oncol Res. 2003;13:409–419. [PubMed]
  • Sheng ZM, Marchetti A, Buttitta F, Champeme MH, Campani D, Bistocchi M, Lidereau R, Callahan R. Multiple regions of chromosome 6q affected by loss of heterozygosity in primary human breast carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 1996;73:144–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stemke-Hale K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lluch A, Neve RM, Davies M, Carey M, Sahin A, Symmans WF, Pusztai L, Nolden LK, et al. The integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN and AKT mutations in breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2008;68:6084–6091. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Staal SP. Molecular cloning of the akt oncogene and its human homologues AKT1 and AKT2: amplification of AKT1 in a primary human gastric adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:5034–5037. [PubMed]
  • Steck PA, Perhouse MA, Jasser SA, Yung WKA, Lin H, Ligon AH, Langford LA, Baumgard ML, Hattier T, Davis T, et al. Identification of a candidate tumour suppressor gene, MMAC1, at chromosome 10q23.3 that is mutated in multiple advanced cancers. Nat Genet. 1997;15:356–362. [PubMed]
  • Wang X, Trotman LC, Koppie T, Alimonti A, Chen Z, Gao Z, Wang J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Cordon-Cardo C, et al. NEDD4-1 is a proto-oncogenic ubiquitin ligase for PTEN. Cell. 2007;128:129–139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wishart MJ, Dixon JE. PTEN and myotubularin phosphatases: from 3-phosphoinositide dephosphorylation to disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12:579–585. [PubMed]
  • Yang C, Zhou W, Jeon MS, Demydenko D, Harada Y, Zhou H, Liu YC. Negative regulation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase itch via Fyn-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation. Mol Cell. 2006;21:135–141. [PubMed]