PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Biochem Pharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 April 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2671632
NIHMSID: NIHMS104308

Adenosine receptor agonists for promotion of dermal wound healing

Abstract

Wound healing is a dynamic and complex process that involves a well coordinated, highly regulated series of events including inflammation, tissue formation, revascularization and tissue remodeling. However, this orderly sequence is impaired in certain pathophysiological conditions such as diabetes mellitus, venous insufficiency, chronic glucocorticoid use, aging and malnutrition. Together with proper wound care, promotion of the healing process is the primary objective in the management of chronic poorly healing wounds. Recent studies have demonstrated that A2A adenosine receptor agonists promote wound healing in normal and diabetic animals and one such agonist, Sonedenoson, is currently being evaluated as a prospective new therapy of diabetic foot ulcers. We will review the mechanisms by which adenosine receptor activation affects the function of the cells and tissues that participate in wound healing, emphasizing the potential beneficial impact of adenosine receptor agonists in diabetic impaired healing.

Keywords: Adenosine receptors, Impaired healing, Inflammation, Diabetic foot ulcer, angiogenesis, Granulation tissue

Introduction

The mechanisms underlying the normal repair process, cell migration and proliferation, and extracellular matrix deposition and remodelling, have been extensively studied [1-3]. Cellular responses to inflammatory mediators, growth factors, cytokines, and to mechanical forces must be appropriate and precise in order to obtain optimum healing of a cutaneous wound. However, even during the normal process of wound healing complications can occur, including infection, thrombosis, and ischemia. [4, 5]. More importantly, the orderly progression of the healing process is impaired in chronic wounds, including those due to diabetes.

Impaired wound healing is a major concern for diabetic patients because their wounds do not heal properly and are a source of major suffering and cost. Only two-thirds of diabetic foot ulcers eventually heal and up to 28% may result in amputation [6]. The pathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcers is complex and it is well recognized that a number of contributory factors working together ultimately lead to impaired healing. Several intrinsic factors, such as peripheral neuropathy, foot deformity, peripheral vascular disease and peripheral oedema have been identified as the commonest factors responsible of impaired healing after trauma. In addition, extrinsic factors, such as wound infection, callus formation, and excessive pressure to the site, further aggravate the healing process [7].

Recent studies suggest that nerves play a central role in tissue homeostasis and can orchestrate complex reparative as well as destructive processes. First, an intact nociceptor system of primary afferent sensory nerves is important for the initiation of the inflammatory process and successful tissue repair [8]. Apart from the loss of pain perception, which is a key factor in the development of neuropathic foot ulcers, loss of autonomic function and small fibre neuropathy can result in impaired neurogenic control of local microcirculatory blood flow, impaired fluid homeostasis, diminished energy metabolism, oxygen delivery, and inflammatory responses. These processes could render the feet of diabetic patients with neuropathy more susceptible to tissue damage and infection [9].

Given the complexity of the pathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcers, many different interventions have been proposed to accelerate the healing process, but few have been subjected to formal evaluation. Despite the relatively large number of studies of growth factors like PDGF (becaplermin), EGF, basic FGF and other agents modulating aspects of wound physiology, there is currently little evidence to suggest that any of the reported interventions should be adopted in routine practice. Diabetic foot ulcer management is based on the simple principles of eliminating infection, debridement, cleansing and the use of dressings to maintain a moist wound bed, and lastly, becaplermin is the only promoting agent approved for use of those ulcers resistant to simpler interventions [6].

Based in studies carried out in vitro and in experimental animal models, we are proposing a new strategy for the promotion of impaired wound healing, the use of adenosine receptor agonists. We will summarized the biology of adenosine and review its actions on different tissues and cells implicated in the healing of cutaneous wounds, as well as its effect on experimental wounds in animals.

Purine metabolism and biology

Adenosine is a ubiquitous purine nucleoside produced by stepwise dephosphorylation of ATP by the coordinated action of ecto-apyrase (CD39) and ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) (Figure 1). While extracellular ATP and other nucleotides (ADP, UTP and UDP) have many biological effects through direct activation of cell surface receptors for adenine nucleotides (seven P2X ionotropic and eight P2Y metabotropic receptor subtypes), adenosine modulates cellular and organ function via occupancy of four specific cell surface receptors, (A1, A2A, A2B and A3), all members of the large family of 7-transmembrane spanning, heterotrimeric G protein-associated receptors [10, 11]. The A1 and A3 adenosine receptors coupled with Gi proteins are associated with two effector systems, namely, adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C. The binding of adenosine or its agonists to A1 and A3 adenosine receptors either induce inhibition of adenylate cyclase leading to a decrease in intracellular cAMP levels or stimulate phospholipase C and the release of intracellular Ca2+. A2A and A2B receptors are associated with Gs proteins and their activation stimulates an increase in intracellular cAMP. In addition, they couple to mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), which may give them a role in cell growth, survival, death and differentiation [12]. The affinity of selected agonists at the different adenosine receptor subtypes is summarized on Table 1.

Figure 1
Adenosine metabolism
Table 1
Binding affinity of selected adenosine receptor agonists at the four receptor subtypes

Extracellular actions of purines in non-neuronal cells, including fast signalling roles in exocrine and endocrine secretion, platelet aggregation, cardiovascular effects and kidney function, have been known for a long time. More recently, slow purinergic signalling has been implicated in embryological development, wound healing, restenosis, atherosclerosis, ischaemia, cell turnover of epithelial cells in skin and visceral organs, inflammation, neuroprotection and cancer [13, 14]. More interestingly, purines and pyrimidines have major roles in the activities of neurons. This includes nociceptive mechanosensory transduction, as well as acting as a cotransmitter and neuromodulator in most, if not all, nerve types in the peripheral and central nervous systems [13]. This raises the innovative hypothesis that diabetic patients suffering from peripheral neuropathy will have altered purinergic neurotransmission.

Could adenosine play a role in normal wound healing?

Under basal conditions, the extracellular adenosine concentration is rather constant (30–300 nM), and held in tight check by the equilibrium between adenosine production/release into the extracellular space and adenosine uptake by cells or catabolism to inosine (Figure 1). In contrast its concentration can increase dramatically to micromolar or even higher ranges when there is an imbalance between energy use and energy supply, such as in oxygen depletion, or under conditions of cellular or tissue necrosis or stress as a result of ATP catabolism [12].

All cell subtypes involved in wound healing, macrophages, epidermal cells, fibroblasts and microvascular endothelial cells, differentially express functional adenosine receptors, although the receptor expression patterns vary between cellular types and have not been fully established. Moreover, even the same cellular type such as endothelial cells express different adenosine receptor subtypes depending on the vascular bed of origin [15]. Adenosine A2A receptors, in particular, are expressed on most cell types involved in wound healing, including macrophages, fibroblasts and microvascular endothelial cells [15-17]. We have reported that A2A receptor-deficient mice suffer from disordered wound healing with poor matrix formation and diminished blood vessel formation in the granulation tissue of excisional wounds and mechanically injured skin, an observation that indicates a role for adenosine, acting at A2A receptors, in normal wound healing [18]. We have further observed that cytokines released during the inflammatory phase of wound healing, TNF-α and IL-1, up-regulate adenosine A2A receptor expression in human monocytoid cells (THP-1) and microvascular endothelial cells [16, 19, 20]. Similarly, A2B receptor expression in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages is also up-regulated by IFN-gamma [21]. The differential adenosine receptor expression in cells from diabetic patients has not been established yet. In this regard, streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats altered adenosine receptors expression in liver, heart and kidney and administration of insulin returned their levels to normality [22]

Adenosine in inflammation

Hemostasis and inflammation constitute the first phase of tissue repair. The formation of a blood clot re-establishes tissue hemostasis and provides a provisional matrix for cell migration. Released cellular mediators initiate inflammatory leukocyte recruitment necessary for removing necrotic tissue and preventing infection [1]. In addition, inflammatory cells release a variety of cytokines and chemokines that play an important role in the evolution of granulation tissue through stimulation of fibroblasts and epithelial cells [4]. However, despite its importance, persistent or exaggerated inflammation could be detrimental for the healing process in some pathological settings. In this respect, the concept that diabetes is a low-level chronic inflammatory disease is commonly accepted [23, 24].

Numerous studies indicate that adenosine, through the activation of its different receptor subtypes, is a potent regulator of inflammation and innate immunity [25, 26]. In fact, genetic deficiency in adenosine deaminase (ADA), the enzyme responsible of the deamination of adenosine to its less potent derivative inosine (Figure 1), is characterized by a severely compromised immune system [27]. Moreover, several studies have established that adenosine mediates the anti-inflammatory effect of mainstay anti-rheumatic drugs such as methrotexate and sufasalazine, and also salicylates, in different animal models of acute and chronic inflammation [28-30].

Adenosine A1 receptor activation has been associated with pro-inflammatory properties in most inflammatory cell types [31, 32]. Nevertheless, studies in vivo have demonstrated the anti-inflammatory effect of selective A1 agonists acting in the Central Nervous System by increasing adenosine concentration at the inflammed site [33, 34].

Adenosine A2A receptors are generally regarded as the receptor subtype most relevant for the anti-inflammatory effect of adenosine. Their activation inhibits neutrophil and monocyte oxidative burst, degranulation and release of cytokines and chemokines [35, 36]. Activation of A2B receptors selectively inhibits collagenase mRNA accumulation in synovial fibroblasts, mediates neutrophil-stimulated intestinal epithelial leakiness and prevents vascular leakage and edema formation [37-39]

The role of adenosine A3 receptors in inflammation has been more controversial, maybe due to the observed difference in agonist affinity between species. have also been described as anti-inflammatory in human blood leukocytes and in murine models of inflammation [40, 41]. We have confirmed the anti-inflammatory effects of adenosine acting at A3 receptors in experimental animals, since animals deficient in this receptor show an exacerbated response to an inflammatory insult when compared to their wild type littermates [42].

It has been firmly established that adenosine modulates the production of both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines including TNFα, IL-10, and IL-12 [16, 43]. The anti-inflammatory effect of adenosine could be beneficial since some reports depict a deleterious effect of TNF in wound healing [44]

Adenosine in tissue formation

Driven by growth factors synthesized by local and migratory cells, fibroblasts migrate on the provisional fibrin scaffold into the wound where they proliferate and construct a more robust collagen rich extracellular matrix. Wound fibroblasts acquire a distinctive contractile and secretory phenotype, known as myofibroblasts, responsible for wound contraction, a very important event in full thickness wounds. In response to many of the same growth factors, epidermal cells migrate from the edge of the wound over the surface of the injured area and proliferate until there is complete wound closure [1, 5].

Many studies have shown that purinoceptors are involved in the regulation of proliferation and differentiation of most target cells. Thus, activation of adenosine A2B receptor and P2Y2 receptors have mitogenic effects in murine keratinocytes [45], contrasting with earlier reports showing that adenosine and its related nucleotides (ATP, ADP, AMP) were antiproliferative for normal human epidermal keratinocytes cultured in the absence or presence of exogenous epidermal growth factor[46].Similarly, the result of adenosine receptor activation in fibroblast proliferation remains unclear [47, 48]. Studies in our laboratory indicated that adenosine A2 receptor occupancy, both A2A and A2B, contributes to enhanced fibroblast and endothelial cell migration.[49].

We have recently reported that activation of adenosine A2A receptors promotes collagen synthesis by human dermal fibroblasts and that blockade or deletion of this receptor in mice protects against bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis, a murine model of scleroderma [17]. The stimulation of collagen synthesis in human dermal fibroblasts occurs through an A2AR/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase-1/mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated pathway [17] Adenosine deaminase (ADA), the principal catabolic enzyme for adenosine in vivo, and its deficiency leads to the spontaneous development of pulmonary and skin fibrosis in mice, in which increased collagen deposition is accompanied by increased levels of key mediators of fibrosis, including transforming growth factor beta1, connective tissue growth factor, and interleukin-13. Pharmacological treatment of ADA-deficient mice with the A2A receptor antagonist ZM-241385 prevented the development of dermal fibrosis in this model of elevated tissue adenosine, by reducing dermal collagen content and expression of profibrotic cytokines and growth factors. These data confirm a fibrogenic role for adenosine in the skin [50]. We also found an increased number of myofibroblasts associated with elevated skin adenosine concentration, a phenomenon that was prevented by pharmacological blockade of A2A receptors [51]. Although these results are consistent with a fibrogenic role for adenosine A2A receptor activation, a possible role for adenosine A2B receptors cannot be ruled out, since the concentration of the antagonist ZM-241385 used in these studies is high enough to also antagonize rodent A2B receptors [52]. Wound healing models have not been studied in ADA-deficient mice.

Adenosine in neovascularization

Revascularization of the wound bed is essential to supply oxygen, nutrients, and inflammatory cells to the newly growing tissue. Two mechanisms contribute to the development of new vessels in the adult: angiogenesis, the formation of new vessels from pre-existing ones; and vasculogenesis, the initial series of events in vascular growth in which endothelial cell precursors (angioblasts) differentiate in situ and assemble into solid endothelial cords [53] This multistep process is highly regulated by a variety of soluble angiogenic growth factors, proteolytic enzymes, which allow endothelial cell detachment and extracellular matrix invasion, and a close interaction between adhesive proteins of the extracellular matrix and their integrin receptors [54, 55]. Among the growth factors implicated in the angiogenic process, bFGF and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are known to be potent angiogenic molecules that induce the growth of new blood vessels during wound healing and embryonic development. [56, 57]. Diabetic patients frequently suffer from macro and microvascular complications characterized by an early dysfunction of vascular endothelium that could further aggravate their impaired healing.

Many studies have shown that the administration of adenosine or adenosine agonists as well as the upregulation of endogenous adenosine can increase the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in a variety of different cells studied in vitro [58-62] and after intravenous infusion of adenosine in humans [63]. Adenosine A2A receptors activation stimulates macrophage production of VEGF as well [60], meanwhile adenosine A2B receptors induce VEGF release by retinal endothelial cells [59, 61].

The elevated expression of VEGF might account for the angiogenic effects of adenosine; however, it is more likely that adenosine also stimulates angiogenesis via other secondary angiogenic and antiangiogenic mediators or by way of an intracellular action [64]. Thus, the adenosine analog NECA also increased the expression of the proangiogenic factors insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in human retinal endothelial cells as well as the expression of the proangiogenic factors interleukin-8 (IL-8) and angiopoietin-2 in human mast cells. A2B receptors mediated the IL-8 and bFGF responses and A3 receptors may have mediated the angiopoietin-2 response [65]. We have shown that adenosine and A2A agonists can promote in vitro angiogenesis by inhibiting endothelial secretion of the anti-angiogenic factor thrombospondin-1 [66].

Adenosine in remodeling

The reparative process culminates with the remodelling of the newly formed granulation tissue in order to restore complete functionality. During this extended phase, the provisional extracellular matrix rich in type 3 collagen is degraded by serine proteases and metalloproteases and sequentially substituted for the definitive matrix rich in type 1 collagen [1]

Activation of plasminogen plays a role in proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrices in tissue remodelling events and it is required for normal repair of skin wounds in mice [67]. Earlier reports showed that the non selective adenosine receptor agonist NECA increased plasminogen activator release in rabbit alveolar macrophages due to intracellular elevations of cAMP [68]. Similarly, cAMP elevating agents increased the acute release of tissue plasminogen activator in human umbilical endothelial cells [69, 70] and intraarterial infusions of ATP, an adenosine precursor, to healthy volunteers induce tPA release [71].

Adenosine agonist promotion of wound healing in animal models

Much of the knowledge of the normal healing process of cutaneous wounds and the mediators involved has evolved from information derived from experimental wounds in animals, especially genetically modified mice. Unfortunately, a valid model of chronic wounds in animals has not yet been developed. From the in vitro experiment data it is difficult to predict which adenosine agonists, if any, will be useful for promoting impaired wound healing in humans.

There are few reports of the use of adenosine agonists for the enhancement of wound healing. We have demonstrated pharmacologically and by the use of mice lacking A2A receptors that topical application of adenosine A2A receptor agonists accelerate healing of dermal wounds in both healthy animals and in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats with impaired wound healing [18, 49, 72]. Histological analysis showed faster re-epithelialization and increased matrix deposition, fibroblast density and vascularity in the granulation tissue of the agonist treated wounds as soon as 3 days after injury [18]. In a model of pressure ulcer formation as a result of recurrent ischemia-reperfusion of the skin, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist infused via osmotic minipumps reduced leukocyte infiltration and protected from ischemia/reperfusion injury in skin [73]. No signs of fibrosis were described in these experimental animal models.

When studying the dose response effect of the selective A2A receptor agonist CGS-21680, a narrow therapeutic window was observed. Both low (0.5 μg /wound) and high concentrations (10 μg /wound) did not affect the rate of wound closure; while intermediate doses were equally effective. Loss of efficacy may be caused by the loss of specificity of CGS-21680 at higher concentrations. In contrast Sonedenoson did not lose its accelerating effect at the highest concentration studied. Moreover, it stimulated more rapid wound closure than CGS-21680, suggesting the possibility that a higher selectivity of MRE0094 for A2A receptors may be important [72]. It is worth noting that the pharmacokinetics of these compounds administered topically in a hydrophilic gel have not been determined and could have important repercussions in the final effect, in terms of penetration or systemic absorption and elimination rate. In the same study 0.01% Becaplermin gel (rhPDGF-BB), the only growth factor approved for clinical use, did not accelerate the rate of wound closure as compared to the control, and both CGS-21680 and Sonedenoson treated wounds closed significantly faster [72].

Topical application of the non selective adenosine receptor agonist 5′-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine (NECA) also normalized the impaired healing induced by subcutaneous injection of dexamethasone- in mice. This effect was only partially abrogated by a selective A2B antagonist, but the contribution of other receptors was not determined [45]. Topical application of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist, N(6)-Cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), also promoted healing of incisional and excisional wounds on the dorsum of both diabetic (db/db) and normal (db/+) mice, although the concentration used was above the selectivity threshold and the participation of other receptors cannot be ruled out. Interestengly, hair growth along the wound margin was enhanced in agonist-treated mice, an effect that has not been described for adenosine A2A agonists [48].

Finally, using an incisional skin-wound model produced on the back of female diabetic mice, intraperitoneal administration of Polydeoxyribonucleotide, a compound mixture of deoxyribonucleotide polymers, improved the impaired wound healing and increased the wound-breaking strength in diabetic mice through adenosine A2 receptors activation. The promoting effect of this compound was blocked by an antagonist, DMPX (3,7-dimethyl-1-propargilxanthine), which blocks both A2A and A2B receptors [74].

As inferred from the in vitro studies previously described, many factors contribute to the effect of adenosine receptor activation in promoting wound healing. The synergistic interaction between Toll-like receptor and adenosine A2A receptor signaling switches macrophages towards an angiogenic phenotype [60, 75], and plays a role in an excisional wound healing model. Mice lacking MyD88, an adapter protein in the signal transduction pathway of Toll-like receptors, heal at a markedly slower rate than wounds in wild-type mice, showing delayed contraction, decreased and delayed granulation tissue formation, and reduced new blood vessel density. CGS21680, an A2A receptor agonist, promoted wound closure and angiogenesis in wild type mice, but had no significant effect on healing of MyD88(-/-) mice, suggesting the synergistic interaction between Toll-like receptors and adenosine A2A receptors signaling in wound healing in vivo [76]

Conclusion

Nowadays there is a high awareness of the problem that diabetic foot ulcers represent in terms of costs and quality of life for those suffering them. Studies to better understand the normal healing process and the pathology of impaired healing have been extremely useful to improve wound management and care. Randomized controlled trials have shown that topical application of becaplermin gel is effective in increasing healing rates for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers with adequate blood supply. However, this efficacy has not translated to positive clinical experience, and the drug is not widely used. Moreover, it is an expensive medication of relative short storage stability and an increased risk of mortality secondary to malignancy was observed in patients. Adenosine receptor agonists represent an attractive and novel alternative to growth factors for promotion of diabetic foot chronic ulcers. They are small synthetic molecules of longer stability and lower cost than growth factors. Given the complexity of the pathogenesis of foot ulcers and the differential adenosine receptor expression in the cells involved in the impaired tissue repair process, it is difficult to predict which agonists, selective or not, could be most useful. To add more complexity, all four receptor adenosine subtypes are G protein-coupled receptors, but also exert cAMP-independent actions. In addition, they couple to mitogen-activated protein kinases by mechanisms that appear to differ substantially, both between receptor subtypes in the same cell type and between the same receptor in different cell types. From our studies, selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists present the advantages of reducing inflammation and increasing vascularization and extracellular matrix deposition. Nevertheless, the fibrogenic potential and increased risk of infection should also be monitorized. Other important factors to be considered are the pharmaceutical formulation and the pharmacokinetics of the agonist used, in order to minimize its systemic effects. As any new strategy in the management of chronic wounds, the use of adenosine agonists has to be evaluated and validated before taking it into practice.

Acknowledgments

MCM is beneficiary of the Ramón y Cajal program from the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia) and a grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS 05/1659) of the Ministry of Science and Innovation, Government of Spain. B.N.C. is a consultant for King Pharmaceuticals, Can-Fite Biopharma, Inc., Bristol-Myers, Squibb, and Tap Pharmaceuticals. He is funded by grants from King Pharmaceuticals and the National Institutes of Health (AA13336, AR41911, GM56268, and HL70952) and is the recipient of honoraria for speaking from Merck Pharmaceuticals, Tap Pharmaceuticals, and Amgen.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Pierce GF, Mustoe TA. Pharmacologic enhancement of wound healing. Annual Review of Medicine. 1995;46:467–481. [PubMed]
2. Romer J, Bugge TH, Pyke C, Lund LR, Flick MJ, Degen JL, Dano K. Plasminogen and wound healing. Nat Med. 1996;2(7):725. [PubMed]
3. Cha J, Falanga V. Stem cells in cutaneous wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25(1):73–8. [PubMed]
4. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev. 2003;83(3):835–70. [PubMed]
5. Falanga V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1736–43. [PubMed]
6. Hinchliffe RJ, Valk GD, Apelqvist J, Armstrong DG, Bakker K, Game FL, Hartemann-Heurtier A, Londahl M, Price PE, van Houtum WH, Jeffcoate WJ. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24(Suppl 1):S119–44. [PubMed]
7. Sibbald R Gary, Woo KY. The biology of chronic foot ulcers in persons with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24(Suppl 1):S25–30. [PubMed]
8. Khalil Z, Helme R. Sensory peptides as neuromodulators of wound healing in aged rats. (Series A, Biological).Journals of Gerontology. 1996;(5):B354–61. [PubMed]
9. Schaper NC, Huijberts M, Pickwell K. Neurovascular control and neurogenic inflammation in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24(Suppl 1):S40–4. [PubMed]
10. Khakh BS, Burnstock G, Kennedy C, King BF, North RA, Seguela P, Voigt M, Humphrey PPA. International Union of Pharmacology. XXIV. Current Status of the Nomenclature and Properties of P2X Receptors and Their Subunits. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53(1):107–118. [PubMed]
11. Fredholm BB, AP IJ, Jacobson KA, Klotz KN, Linden J. International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53(4):527–52. [PubMed]
12. Schulte G, Fredholm BB. Signalling from adenosine receptors to mitogen-activated protein kinases. Cell Signal. 2003;15(9):813–27. [PubMed]
13. Burnstock G. Purinergic signalling. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147(Suppl 1):S172–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Jacobson KA, Gao Z-G. Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets. 2006;5(3):247–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Feoktistov I, Goldstein AE, Ryzhov S, Zeng D, Belardinelli L, Voyno-Yasenetskaya T, Biaggioni I. Differential expression of adenosine receptors in human endothelial cells: role of A2B receptors in angiogenic factor regulation. Circ Res. 2002;90(5):531–8. [PubMed]
16. Khoa ND, Montesinos MC, Reiss AB, Delano D, Awadallah N, Cronstein BN. Inflammatory cytokines regulate function and expression of adenosine A(2A) receptors in human monocytic THP-1 cells. J Immunol. 2001;167(7):4026–32. [PubMed]
17. Chan ES, Fernandez P, Merchant AA, Montesinos MC, Trzaska S, Desai A, Tung CF, Khoa DN, Pillinger MH, Reiss AB, Tomic-Canic M, Chen JF, Schwarzschild MA, Cronstein BN. Adenosine A2A receptors in diffuse dermal fibrosis: pathogenic role in human dermal fibroblasts and in a murine model of scleroderma. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2632–42. [PubMed]
18. Montesinos MC, Desai A, Chen JF, Yee H, Schwarzschild MA, Fink JS, Cronstein BN. Adenosine promotes wound healing and mediates angiogenesis in response to tissue injury via occupancy of A(2A) receptors. Am J Pathol. 2002;160(6):2009–18. [PubMed]
19. Nguyen DK, Montesinos MC, Williams AJ, Kelly M, Cronstein BN. Th1 cytokines regulate adenosine receptors and their downstream signaling elements in human microvascular endothelial cells. J Immunol. 2003;171(8):3991–8. [PubMed]
20. Khoa ND, Postow M, Danielsson J, Cronstein BN. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha prevents desensitization of Galphas-coupled receptors by regulating GRK2 association with the plasma membrane. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69(4):1311–9. [PubMed]
21. Xaus J, Mirabet M, Lloberas J, Soler C, Lluis C, Franco R, Celada A. IFN-gamma upregulates the A2B adenosine receptor expression in macrophages: a mechanism of macrophage deactivation. J Immunol. 1999;162(6):3607–14. [PubMed]
22. Grden M, Podgorska M, Szutowicz A, Pawelczyk T. Diabetes-induced alterations of adenosine receptors expression level in rat liver. Exp Mol Pathol. 2007;83(3):392–8. [PubMed]
23. Brownlee M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism. Diabetes. 2005;54(6):1615–25. [PubMed]
24. Lafuente N, Matesanz N, Azcutia V, Romacho T, Nevado J, Rodriguez-Manas L, Moncada S, Peiro C, Sanchez-Ferrer CF. The deleterious effect of high concentrations of D-glucose requires pro-inflammatory preconditioning. J Hypertens. 2008;26(3):478–85. [PubMed]
25. Montesinos M, Cronstein B. Role of P1 receptors in inflammation. In: Abbrachio M, Williams M, editors. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. Vol 151/II: Purinergic and Pyrmidinergic Signalling II Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Immune, Metabolic and Gastrointestinal Tract Function. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 2001. pp. 303–321.
26. Hasko G, Linden J, Cronstein B, Pacher P. Adenosine receptors: therapeutic aspects for inflammatory and immune diseases. 2008;7(9):759–770. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Sitkovsky MV. Extracellular purines and their receptors in immunoregulation. Review of recent advances. Nippon Ika Daigaku Zasshi. 1998;65(5):351–7. [PubMed]
28. Cronstein BN, Naime D, Ostad E. The antiinflammatory mechanism of methotrexate: increased adenosine release at inflamed sites diminishes leukocyte accumulation in an in vivo model of inflammation. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1993;92:2675–2682. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Cronstein BN, Montesinos MC, Weissmann G. Salicylates and sulfasalazine, but not glucocorticoids, inhibit leukocyte accumulation by an adenosine-dependent mechanism that is independent of inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis and p105 of NFkappaB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(11):6377–81. [PubMed]
30. Morabito L, Montesinos MC, Schreibman DM, Balter L, Thompson LF, Resta R, Carlin G, Huie MA, Cronstein BN. Methotrexate and Sulfasalazine Promote Adenosine Release by a Mechanism that Requires Ecto-5′-nucleotidase-mediated Conversion of Adenine Nucleotides. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(2):295–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Cronstein BN, Duguma L, Nicholls D, Hutchison A, Williams M. The adenosine/neutrophil paradox resolved. Human neutrophils possess both A1 and A2 receptors which promote chemotaxis and inhibit O2-generation, respectively. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1990;85:1150–1157. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Salmon JE, Brogle N, Brownlie C, Edberg JC, Kimberly RP, Chen BX, Erlanger BF. Human mononuclear phagocytes express adenosine A1 receptors. A novel mechanism for differential regulation of Fc gamma receptor function. Journal of Immunology. 1993;151(5):2775–85. [PubMed]
33. Lesch ME, Ferin MA, Wright CD, Schrier DJ. The effects of (R)-N-(1-methyl-2-phenylethyl) adenosine (L-PIA), a standard A1-selective adenosine agonist on rat acute models of inflammation and neutrophil function. Agents & Actions. 1991;34:25–27. [PubMed]
34. Bong GW, Rosengren S, Firestein GS. Spinal cord adenosine receptor stimulation in rats inhibits peripheral neutrophil accumulation. The role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1996;98:2779–2785. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Cronstein BN, Kramer SB, Weissmann G, Hirschhorn R. Adenosine: a physiological modulator of superoxide anion generation by human neutrophils. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1983;158:1160–1177. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Bouma MG, Stad RK, van den Wildenberg FA, Buurman WA. Differential regulatory effects of adenosine on cytokine release by activated human monocytes. Journal of Immunology. 1994;153(9):4159–68. [PubMed]
37. Firestein GS, Paine MM, Boyle DL. Mechanisms of methotrexate action in rheumatoid arthritis. Selective decrease in synovial collagenase gene expression. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1994;37:193–200. [PubMed]
38. Lennon PF, Taylor CT, Stahl GL, Colgan SP. Neutrophil-derived 5′-adenosine monophosphate promotes endothelial barrier function via CD73-mediated conversion to adenosine and endothelial A2B receptor activation. J Exp Med. 1998;188(8):1433–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Thompson LF, Eltzschig HK, Ibla JC, Van De Wiele CJ, Resta R, Morote-Garcia JC, Colgan SP. Crucial role for ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) in vascular leakage during hypoxia. J Exp Med. 2004;200(11):1395–405. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Salvatore CA, Tilley SL, Latour AM, Fletcher DS, Koller BH, Jacobson MA. Disruption of the A(3) adenosine receptor gene in mice and its effect on stimulated inflammatory cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(6):4429–34. [PubMed]
41. Baharav E, Bar-Yehuda S, Madi L, Silberman D, Rath-Wolfson L, Halpren M, Ochaion A, Weinberger A, Fishman P. Antiinflammatory effect of A3 adenosine receptor agonists in murine autoimmune arthritis models. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(3):469–76. [PubMed]
42. Montesinos MC, Desai A, Cronstein BN. Suppression of inflammation by low-dose methotrexate is mediated by adenosine A2A receptor but not A3 receptor activation in thioglycollate-induced peritonitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(2):R53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Hasko G, Kuhel DG, Chen JF, Schwarzschild MA, Deitch EA, Mabley JG, Marton A, Szabo C. Adenosine inhibits IL-12 and TNF-alpha production via adenosine A2a receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms [In Process Citation] Faseb J. 2000;14(13):2065–74. [PubMed]
44. Mi Q, Riviere B, Clermont G, Steed DL, Vodovotz Y. Agent-based model of inflammation and wound healing: insights into diabetic foot ulcer pathology and the role of transforming growth factor beta1. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15(5):671–82. [PubMed]
45. Braun M, Lelieur K, Kietzmann M. Purinergic substances promote murine keratinocyte proliferation and enhance impaired wound healing in mice. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14(2):152–61. [PubMed]
46. Cook PW, Ashton NM, Pittelkow MR. Adenosine and adenine nucleotides inhibit the autonomous and epidermal growth factor-mediated proliferation of cultured human keratinocytes. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1995;104(6):976–981. [PubMed]
47. Thellung S, Florio T, Maragliano A, Cattarini G, Schettini G. Polydeoxyribonucleotides enhance the proliferation of human skin fibroblasts: Involvement of A2 purinergic receptor subtypes. Life Sciences. 1999;64(18):1661–1674. [PubMed]
48. Sun LL, Xu LL, Nielsen TB, Rhee P, Burris D. Cyclopentyladenosine improves cell proliferation, wound healing, and hair growth. J Surg Res. 1999;87(1):14–24. [PubMed]
49. Montesinos MC, Gadangi P, Longaker M, Sung J, Levine J, Nilsen D, Reibman J, Li M, Jiang CK, Hirschhorn R, Recht PA, Ostad E, Levin RI, Cronstein BN. Wound healing is accelerated by agonists of adenosine A2 (G alpha s- linked) receptors. J Exp Med. 1997;186(9):1615–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Fernandez P, Trzaska S, Wilder T, Chiriboga L, Blackburn MR, Cronstein BN, Chan ES. Pharmacological blockade of A2A receptors prevents dermal fibrosis in a model of elevated tissue adenosine. Am J Pathol. 2008;172(6):1675–82. [PubMed]
51. Katebi M, Fernandez P, Chan ES, Cronstein BN. Adenosine A(2A) Receptor Blockade or Deletion Diminishes Fibrocyte Accumulation in the Skin in a Murine Model of Scleroderma, Bleomycin-induced Fibrosis. Inflammation. 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Kreckler LM, Wan TC, Ge ZD, Auchampach JA. Adenosine inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha release from mouse peritoneal macrophages via A2A and A2B but not the A3 adenosine receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;317(1):172–80. [PubMed]
53. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997;275(5302):964–7. [PubMed]
54. Naik MU, Mousa SA, Parkos CA, Naik UP. Signaling through JAM-1 and {alpha}v{beta}3 is required for the angiogenic action of bFGF: dissociation of the JAM-1 and {alpha}v{beta}3 complex. Blood. 2003;102(6):2108–2114. [PubMed]
55. Pepper MS. Role of the Matrix Metalloproteinase and Plasminogen Activator-Plasmin Systems in Angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21(7):1104–1117. [PubMed]
56. Pepper MS, Rosnoblet C, Di Sanza C, Kruithof EK. Synergistic induction of t-PA by vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor and localization of t-PA to Weibel-Palade bodies in bovine microvascular endothelial cells. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86(2):702–9. [PubMed]
57. Ratel D, Mihoubi S, Beaulieu E, Durocher Y, Rivard G-E, Gingras D, Béliveau R. VEGF increases the fibrinolytic activity of endothelial cells within fibrin matrices: Involvement of VEGFR-2, tissue type plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinases. Thrombosis Research. 2007;121(2):203–212. [PubMed]
58. Lutty GA, Mathews MK, Merges C, McLeod DS. Adenosine stimulates canine retinal microvascular endothelial cell migration and tube formation. Curr Eye Res. 1998;17(6):594–607. [PubMed]
59. Grant MB, Tarnuzzer RW, Caballero S, Ozeck MJ, Davis MI, Spoerri PE, Feoktistov I, Biaggioni I, Shryock JC, Belardinelli L. Adenosine receptor activation induces vascular endothelial growth factor in human retinal endothelial cells. Circ Res. 1999;85(8):699–706. [PubMed]
60. Leibovich SJ, Chen JF, Pinhal-Enfield G, Belem PC, Elson G, Rosania A, Ramanathan M, Montesinos C, Jacobson M, Schwarzschild MA, Fink JS, Cronstein B. Synergistic up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in murine macrophages by adenosine A(2A) receptor agonists and endotoxin. Am J Pathol. 2002;160(6):2231–44. [PubMed]
61. Feoktistov I, Ryzhov S, Zhong H, Goldstein AE, Matafonov A, Zeng D, Biaggioni I. Hypoxia modulates adenosine receptors in human endothelial and smooth muscle cells toward an A2B angiogenic phenotype. Hypertension. 2004;44(5):649–54. [PubMed]
62. Clark AN, Youkey R, Liu X, Jia L, Blatt R, Day Y-J, Sullivan GW, Linden J, Tucker AL. A1 Adenosine Receptor Activation Promotes Angiogenesis and Release of VEGF From Monocytes. Circ Res. 2007;101(11):1130–1138. [PubMed]
63. Adair TH, Cotten R, Gu JW, Pryor JS, Bennett KR, McMullan MR, McDonnell P, Montani JP. Adenosine infusion increases plasma levels of VEGF in humans. BMC Physiol. 2005;5:10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Adair TH. Growth regulation of the vascular system: an emerging role for adenosine. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;289(2):R283–R296. [PubMed]
65. Feoktistov I, Ryzhov S, Goldstein AE, Biaggioni I. Mast cell-mediated stimulation of angiogenesis: cooperative interaction between A2B and A3 adenosine receptors. Circ Res. 2003;92(5):485–92. [PubMed]
66. Desai A, Victor-Vega C, Gadangi S, Montesinos MC, Chu CC, Cronstein BN. Adenosine A2A receptor stimulation increases angiogenesis by down-regulating production of the antiangiogenic matrix protein thrombospondin 1. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67(5):1406–13. [PubMed]
67. Romer J, Bugge TH, Pyke C, Lund LR, Flick MJ, Degen JL, Dano K. Impaired wound healing in mice with a disrupted plasminogen gene. Nature Medicine. 1996;2(3):287–292. [see comments] [PubMed]
68. Hasday JD, Sitrin RG. Adenosine receptors on rabbit alveolar macrophages: binding characteristics and effects on cellular function. J.Lab.Clin.Med. 1987;110:264–273. [PubMed]
69. Hegeman RJ, van den Eijnden-Schrauwen Y, Emeis JJ. Adenosine 3′:5′-cyclic monophosphate induces regulated secretion of tissue-type plasminogen activator and von Willebrand factor from cultured human endothelial cells. Thromb Haemost. 1998;79(4):853–8. [PubMed]
70. Santell L, Levin EG. Cyclic AMP potentiates phorbol ester stimulation of tissue plasminogen activator release and inhibits secretion of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 from human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1988;263(32):16802–8. [PubMed]
71. Hrafnkelsdottir T, Erlinge D, Jern S. Extracellular nucleotides ATP and UTP induce a marked acute release of tissue-type plasminogen activator in vivo in man. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85(5):875–81. [PubMed]
72. Victor-Vega C, Desai A, Montesinos MC, Cronstein BN. Adenosine A2A receptor agonists promote more rapid wound healing than recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (Becaplermin gel) Inflammation. 2002;26(1):19–24. [PubMed]
73. Peirce SM, Skalak TC, Rieger JM, Macdonald TL, Linden J. Selective A(2A) adenosine receptor activation reduces skin pressure ulcer formation and inflammation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;281(1):H67–74. [PubMed]
74. Galeano M, Bitto A, Altavilla D, Minutoli L, Polito F, Calo M, Lo Cascio P, d’Alcontres F Stagno, Squadrito F. Polydeoxyribonucleotide stimulates angiogenesis and wound healing in the genetically diabetic mouse. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16(2):208–17. [PubMed]
75. Ramakers BP, Riksen NP, Rongen GA, van der Hoeven JG, Smits P, Pickkers P. The effect of adenosine receptor agonists on cytokine release by human mononuclear cells depends on the specific Toll-like receptor subtype used for stimulation. Cytokine. 2006 [PubMed]
76. Macedo L, Pinhal-Enfield G, Alshits V, Elson G, Cronstein BN, Leibovich SJ. Wound Healing Is Impaired in MyD88-Deficient Mice: A Role for MyD88 in the Regulation of Wound Healing by Adenosine A2A Receptors. Am J Pathol. 2007;171(6):1774–88. [PubMed]
77. Fredholm BB, Irenius E, Kull B, Schulte G. Comparison of the potency of adenosine as an agonist at human adenosine receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2001;61(4):443–8. [PubMed]