PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of diacareAmerican Diabetes AssociationSubscribeSearchDiabetes Care Journal
 
Diabetes Care. 2009 May; 32(5): 894–896.
Published online 2009 February 24. doi:  10.2337/dc08-0490
PMCID: PMC2671092

Cognitive Function Is Not Associated With Recurrent Foot Ulcers in Patients With Diabetes and Neuropathy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study whether there is an association between cognitive impairment and the relapse rate of foot ulcers in diabetic patients and those with previous foot ulcers.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This single-center prospective study assessed the association of cognitive function and risk for ulcer relapse in 59 patients with diabetes (mean age 65.1 years, diabetes duration 16.5 years, and A1C 7.4%), peripheral neuropathy, and a history of foot ulceration. Premorbid and current cognitive functions were measured (multiple-choice vocabulary test [Lehrl], number-symbol test, mosaic test [HAWIE-R], and trail-making tests A and B [Reitan]). Prevalence of depression was evaluated retrospectively (diagnoses in patient files or use of antidepressive medication). Patients were re-examined after 1 year.

RESULTS

Three patients (5%) died during follow-up (one of sepsis and two of heart problems). The remaining 56 patients (48%) developed 27 new foot ulcerations (78% superficial ulcerations [Wagner stage 1]). Characteristics of patients with and without ulcer relapse were not different. In a binary logistic regression analysis, cognitive function is not predictive of foot reulceration.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive function is not an important determinant of foot reulceration.

Diabetic patients and those with a history of foot ulcers are at risk for foot reulceration (1,2). Although cognitive function is known to be impaired in patients with diabetes compared with that in nondiabetic control subjects (3), no studies have examined the potential role of cognitive impairment, an important factor for educational success (4), in the development or recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers. Our hypothesis is that cognitive function is associated with the relapse rate of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes and previous foot ulcers.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This single-center prospective study was performed at a tertiary care center for diabetes (university hospital) and approved by the local ethics committee. Between October 2003 and June 2004, 69 patients with type 2 diabetes and previous foot ulcers were included. All gave written informed consent. Of these, 68% participated in a structured patient education program at our clinic. At baseline, a single investigator performed the neuropsychological testing, and all patients were examined for new ulcers 12 months later. Ten patients were excluded because testing was impossible (impaired vision [n = 7] or Parkinson′s disease and debility [n = 3]). Testing assessed premorbid cognitive function (PCF) using a questionnaire by Wolfram and Wieczorek (5). Current cognitive function (CCF) was assessed using the multiple-choice vocabulary test by Lehrl (6); the number-symbol test and mosaic test, which are both part of the Hamburg-Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (HAWIE-R) (7); and the trail-making test parts A and B by Reitan (8), an indicator for cognitive impairment due to brain damage. Loss of cognitive function was calculated by subtracting CCF from PCF. All test results were transferred into intelligence quotient (IQ) points according to age-related scales (100 IQ points reflect normal intelligence compared with the general population).

Prevalence of depression was estimated retrospectively by searching for a diagnosis of depression or use of antidepressive drugs in the patient files. Peripheral diabetic neuropathy was diagnosed using the neuropathy symptom score and neuropathy disability score by Young et al. (9). The number of previous foot ulcerations was drawn from patient files, wound stages classified according to the Wagner wound classification system (six stages from no lesion to total necrosis) (10), retinopathy graded according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) criteria, and nephropathy with creatinine clearance and microalbuminuria. A1C was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (TOSOH-HLC-723-GHbV; Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) (range 4.5–5.9; mean ± SD 5.2 ± 0.33%). Blood pressure was measured with patient seated using an oscillometric sphygmomanometer (OMRON).

SPSS (version 14; Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses, with P < 0.05 regarded as significant. A χ2 test was performed for categorical data and ordinal data with less than four categories, the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data, and the Student's t test for normally distributed data. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study patients (39 male, 17 female, all Caucasian) were as follows: age 65.1 ± 8.9 years, diabetes duration 16.5 ± 9.1 years, A1C 7.38 ± 1.30%, blood pressure 149.5 ± 25.3/77.5 ± 13.0 mmHg, number of antihypertensive drugs 2.5 ± 1.1 (span 0–6), BMI 31.6 ± 4.9 kg/m2, and number of previous ulcers 2.9 ± 2.4 (median 2.0; span 1–9). Prevalence of severe neuropathy (neuropathy disability score >7) was present in 75% of patients (n = 44), and 15% (n = 9) suffered from diabetic osteoarthropathy. Orthopedic footwear was used by 78% (n = 46), and specialized foot care by 80% (n = 47). Peripheral artery disease was present in 53% (n = 31), and other macrovascular problems (past myocardial infarct, cardiovascular disease, or stroke) in 58% (n = 34). Insulin therapy was used by 90% (n = 47), and statins by 49% (n = 29). Low social status (without professional education and jobless) was recorded for 4% (n = 2), retirement for 76% (n = 45), and living with relatives for 81% (n = 48). Smoker or ex-smoker was recorded for 64% (n = 38), and drinking two or more alcohol equivalents per day was 15% (n = 9). Those suffering from nephropathy were 71% (n = 42), from retinopathy 51% (n = 30), and from both microvascular complications 39% (n = 23). A diagnosis of depression and/or antidepressive drugs was prevalent in 14% (n = 8).

The results of neuropsychological testing are as follows: (results in IQ points) PCF, 102.0 ± 8.7; CCF, 89.7 ± 11.1; number-symbol test, 95.3 ± 12.3; mosaic test, 94.6 ± 14.1; and trail-making test, 67.5 ± 13.5. After 12 months, three patients had died (sepsis, heart insufficiency, or sudden cardiac death). New foot lesions occurred in 27 patients (48%); 3 (5%) underwent a minor amputation (two toes and one forefoot).

The remaining 56 patients with and without ulcer relapse were not different for neuropsychological testing or other characteristics (results in Table 1). Cognitive function was not predictive for ulcer relapse in the binary logistic regression analysis using ulcer relapse as a dependent variable (odds ratio [95% CI] PCF 0.99 [0.94–1.06], CCF 0.99 [0.04–1.04], loss of cognitive function 1.01 [0.96–1.06], multiple-choice vocabulary test 0.99 [0.96–1.02], number-symbol test 0.98 [0.94–1.02], mosaic test 0.99 [0.96–1.04], trail-making test 1.0 [0.97–1.05]). Adjusting for age, diabetes duration, and depression did not alter the results.

Table 1
Characteristics of patients with and without ulcer relapse

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, no difference of cognitive function was found in patients with and without ulcer relapse. Therefore, a failure of patient education to prevent recurrent foot ulcers cannot be attributed to reduced cognitive function.

Patient characteristics were not different for ulcer relapse and nonrelapse patients. This is important because numerous confounders (e.g., age, A1C, diabetes duration, blood pressure, smoking, and alcohol intake) are reported to be associated with decreased cognitive function (11) and foot problems (3). For the study, 48% of patients developed a new ulceration, which is in keeping with other reported rates (2,12).

Depression is a major differential diagnosis for cognitive dysfunction (13) and has been shown to have a 30% prevalence among diabetic patients with neuropathy (14,15). Results of our study are limited in that the study did not screen for depression. Although an association of depression with micro- and macrovascular complications and mortality is described (14,15), a direct association of depression with the occurrence of diabetic foot ulcers was not reported (1315). In a post hoc analyses using diagnosis of depression or use of an antidepressant medication as an indicator for depression, these patients were evenly distributed in the ulcer-relapse and non–ulcer-relapse groups. Nevertheless, the prevalence of depression is likely to be underestimated, which possibly affects the results. In conclusion, this study does not support the commonly held belief that cognitive dysfunction is an important determinant of foot reulceration.

Acknowledgments

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Footnotes

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

References

1. Abbott C, Vileikyte L, Williamson S, Carrington A, Boulton A.: Multicenter study of the incidence of and predictive risk factors for diabetic neuropathic foot ulceration. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1071– 1075 [PubMed]
2. Murray HJ, Young MJ, Hollis S, Boulton AJ.: The association between callus formation, high pressure and neuropathy in diabetic foot ulceration. Diabet Med 1996; 13: 979– 982 [PubMed]
3. Fontbonne A, Berr C, Ducimetiere P, Alperovitch A.: Changes in cognitive abilities over a 4-year period are unfavorably affected in elderly diabetic subjects: results of the Epidemiology of Vascular Aging Study. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 366– 370 [PubMed]
4. Braun A, Müller UA, Müller R, Leppert K, Schiel R.: Structured treatment and teaching of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired cognitive function–the DICOF trial. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 999– 1006 [PubMed]
5. Wolfram H, Wieczorek V.: Zur Messung des prämorbiden Leistungsniveaus. Nervenarzt 1990; 61: 495– 498[in German] [PubMed]
6. Lehrl S.: Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest (MWT-B). Erlangen, Germany, Straube, 1995. [in German]
7. Tewes U.: Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest-R: Handbuch und Testanweisung. Bern, Switzerland, Hans Huber, 1994. [in German]
8. Reitan RM.: Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 1958; 8: 271– 276
9. Young MJ, Boulton AJM, Macleod AF, Williams DRR, Sonksen PH.: A multicentre study of the prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the United Kingdom hospital clinic population. Diabetologia 1993; 36: 150– 154 [PubMed]
10. Wagner FW.: The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle 1981; 2: 64– 122 [PubMed]
11. Anttila T, Helkala E, Viitanen M, Kareholt I, Fratiglioni L, Winblad B, Soininen H, Tuomilehto J, Nissinen A, Kivipelto M.: Alcohol drinking in middle age and subsequent risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in old age: a prospective population based study. BMJ 2004; 329: 539– 542 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Busch K, Chantelau E.: Effectiveness of a new brand of stock ‘diabetic’ shoes to protect against diabetic foot ulcer relapse: a prospective cohort study. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 665– 669 [PubMed]
13. de Groot M, Anderson R, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ.: Association of depression and diabetes complications: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2001; 63: 619– 630 [PubMed]
14. Ismail K, Winkley K, Stahl D, Chalder T, Edmonds M.: A cohort study of people with diabetes and their first foot ulcer: the role of depression on mortality. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1473– 1479 [PubMed]
15. Vileikyte L, Leventhal H, Gonzalez JS, Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Ulbrecht JS, Garrow A, Waterman C, Cavanagh PR, Boulton AJM.: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and depressive symptoms: the association. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2378– 2383 [PubMed]

Articles from Diabetes Care are provided here courtesy of American Diabetes Association