PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of rheumatologyLink to Publisher's site
 
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 May; 48(5): 576–581.
Published online 2009 March 13. doi:  10.1093/rheumatology/kep020
PMCID: PMC2669765

Association between depression and coronary artery calcification in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

Objectives. To determine the associations between depression, cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery calcification (CAC) in women with SLE and controls.

Methods. CAC was measured using electron-beam CT (EBCT). Traditional, inflammatory and lupus-related risk factors as well as depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale—CES-D) were measured at a single study visit in 161 women with SLE and 161 age- and race frequency-matched female healthy controls.

Results. Women with SLE reported more depressive symptoms than controls, with 27% of SLE and 15% of controls having CES-D scores suggestive of clinical depression. SLE women were more likely to have CAC, as well as more severe CAC compared with controls. Among the SLE women, depression was associated with greater than 2-fold odds of having any CAC [odds ratio (OR) 2.48; 95% CI 1.05, 5.87; P = 0.04], independent of traditional risk factors (age, hypertension and triglycerides) and inflammatory markers. However, when BMI was included among the covariates, the association between depression and CAC was attenuated, indicating the potential mediating role of BMI. Depression was not a risk factor for CAC in controls.

Conclusions. In women with SLE, depression was associated with CAC. This association was mediated by BMI. Depression and adiposity may add to the inflammatory burden of SLE, thus contributing to cardiovascular disease risk.

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Calcified tissue, Cardiovascular, Depression, CT scanning, Adipose tissue, Psychosocial factors, Risk factors, Inflammation

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the major contributors to morbidity and mortality in women with SLE. Young women with lupus (aged 35–44 years) are 50 times more likely to have an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than age-matched women from the Framingham study [1]. Women with SLE also experience higher than expected rates of hypertension and stroke [2–4]. Markers of subclinical atherosclerosis such as carotid artery plaque and coronary artery calcification (CAC) are more prevalent in SLE patients than in controls [5,6], are present at younger ages, and may be predictive of future cardiac events [7].

To address the problem of early atherosclerosis in SLE requires identification of contributors. The contributing risk factors to early atherosclerosis in SLE are complex and may be interrelated, suggesting that this risk is likely multi-factorial [8,9]. Identified potential contributors include traditional CVD risk factors, those related to SLE disease pathogenesis and treatment and inflammation- or immune-mediated factors [3]. Traditional risk factors for CVD, such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and BMI are common in SLE and are associated with carotid plaque [2,10], coronary artery disease [11] and coronary calcium [12]. Antibodies frequently identified in patients with lupus (LAC, aPL autoantibodies) were found to predict carotid artery plaque in SLE women [13]. Duration of SLE, age and homocysteine levels were identified as independent contributors to CAC [14]. Serum levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 were also identified as a contributor to CAC after adjustment for traditional and SLE-related variables [15]. Although the individual risk factors are not consistent across studies, it appears that markers associated with a pro-inflammatory state in SLE are associated with CVD risk in this group.

Depression and psychological stress are associated with increased inflammation in healthy persons [16] and in RA patients [17]. Depression has been linked to increased levels of the inflammatory markers CRP and IL-6, [18] as well as increased platelet activity and hypercoagulable states [19] that are thought to contribute to atherosclerosis [20,21]. Women with a history of recurrent major depression had greater than 2-fold risk for CAC than those without depression [22]. In addition, depression predicted coronary heart disease events over an 8-year follow-up period in older adult women without known CVD at baseline [23] and over a 10-year follow-up in a younger female cohort [24].

Depression may represent another piece of the CVD risk factor puzzle in SLE. Depression is prevalent in SLE. A recent report found a current major depressive episode in 22.5% of SLE patients [25]. Compared with the general population, women with SLE are more likely to be hospitalized for severe depression (standardized incidence rate 2.80) [26]. Depressive symptoms are higher in SLE than controls [27], and self-reported mental health is lower than that of controls [28] and RA patients [29]. Given the painful, unpredictable and often disabling nature of SLE, depressive symptoms may be an understandable psychosocial consequence of the illness. In addition, medication side effects may contribute to depressive symptoms in SLE. Although depression has been linked to inflammation and atherosclerosis in the CVD literature, the potential contribution of depression to atherosclerosis in SLE has not been investigated.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between depressive symptoms and CVD risks in a group of women with SLE and a comparison group of healthy control women of similar age and race. We hypothesized that depression and CAC would be greater among SLE patients than controls, and that depression would be associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, specifically, CAC.

Patients and methods

Study population

The SLE and healthy women (control) participants in this study were enrolled in the Heart Effects on Atherosclerosis and Risk of Thrombosis in SLE (HEARTS) funded by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of the HEARTS study was to compare prevalence and risk factors for CAC in SLE women and healthy controls. The SLE women were without prior history of CVD events [30] and were non-selectively recruited from the Pittsburgh Lupus Registry, which at the time of enrolment included 983 living participants. The registry includes patients seen either at inpatient or outpatient facilities at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center or by practising rheumatologists within the Pittsburgh, PA metropolitan area. Thus, the SLE patients are a community-based sample with mild to severe SLE but with minimal tertiary care centre referral bias. All SLE women were required to fulfil 1982 or 1997 ACR revised criteria for the classification of definite or probable SLE [31,32] and be over the age of 18 years.

The HEARTS control participants were women without prior cardiac events who were recruited using voter registration lists, and were similar to the SLE women in age (±5 years), race and area of residence. All participants completed informed consent procedures. The study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh's Institutional Review Board.

Procedures

The study procedures included an interview, completion of a validated depression questionnaire [Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)], physical examination and laboratory and imaging studies [electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT)]. Each participant completed the study procedures during a single study visit. Data for this cross-sectional study were collected between March 2002 and September 2005.

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors

Information on age, race, education level, household income, smoking habits, family history of CVD (MI, stroke or sudden death of a first-degree relative before the age of 60 years), menopausal status and BMI were collected. Blood pressure was determined and hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) [gt-or-equal, slanted]140 mmHg systolic or [gt-or-equal, slanted]90 mmHg diastolic or the use of anti-hypertensive therapy. Fasting blood samples were obtained for standard laboratory testing of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin and glucose levels. Insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostatic model (HOMA-IR) formula [7,33]:

equation image

Inflammatory markers

Laboratory assessments of inflammatory markers were conducted using blood samples from the single study visit. Assays were run in batches to reduce analytical variability. Soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) were measured by commercial assays (Parameter Human sE-selectin Immunoassay and Human sICAM-1 Immunoassay; both from R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). High-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) was quantified by automated particle-enhanced immunonephelometry (BN-II, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL, USA). Fibrinogen was measured using an automated clot-rate assay (Diagnosica Stago STA-R, Parsippany, NJ, USA) [34,35] (R.P.T., University of Vermont).

SLE-related factors

Two rheumatologists specializing in lupus (A.H.K. and S.M.) assessed SLE disease activity and cumulative organ damage due to SLE at the study visit. Lupus measures included the revised SLAM (SLAM-R) [36], the SLEDAI [37] and the SLICC damage index [38] with the vascular items removed. We also collected information regarding individual criteria for SLE diagnosis and history of steroid use.

Psychosocial assessment

Participants completed the CES-D [39] during the study visit. The CES-D [39] is a validated 20 item self-report instrument used extensively in community samples and medically ill groups, including SLE [27,40–42]. The CES-D items assess past week symptoms consistent with a depressive disorder. Clinically significant depression is defined as a CES-D score [gt-or-equal, slanted]16.

CAC

Presence of CAC was determined using EBCT (Imatron C-150 scanner, Imatron, San Francisco, CA, USA). About 30–40 3 mm slices starting at the aortic root to the apex of the heart were scanned in all participants at the same point during diastole (80% of the R-R interval in the ECG) during a single breath hold. The images were scored for calcification using the Agatston method [43]. Presence of CAC was defined as Agatston score >0.

Data analysis

The distributions of the continuous variables were examined by Q–Q plot, skewness/kurtosis test and the Shapiro–Wilk test of normality. Depending on the nature of the distributions, either two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed for comparison of SLE and controls. Differences in categorical variables were tested using two sample tests of proportions. In all tables, we report means and standard deviations for normally distributed variables, and median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed continuous variables.

Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between risk factors and presence or absence of CAC in SLE and controls. All assumptions related to single-predictor and multi-predictor logistic regression analysis were met.

In addition to determining whether depression was a contributor to CAC, we were interested in whether CVD risk factors mediated the depression and CAC association. Potentially mediating variables were first identified based on significant associations with both depression and CAC. A bias-corrected bootstrap CI for percentage decrease in the depression coefficient due to mediation and the equivalent proportion of treatment explained (PTE) was performed to determine that the attenuation was not due to chance.

To select variables for inclusion in multivariable models, we first chose risk factors that were found significant (P < 0.20) in unadjusted single predictor models. Covariates were evaluated for multi-collinearity and were selected out or centred if necessary. Variables were retained if removing them changed the coefficient of the primary predictor, depression, >10–15%. Variables were removed if their inclusion resulted in a large increase in the standard error of the coefficient of depression [44]. Only those covariates retained in the model at P < 0.10 were included in final analyses. Final models were checked for interaction effects. Adequacy of multivariable models was evaluated using the specification link test and Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. SPSS 15 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and STATA 9 (Intercooled Stata 9.1, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) were used to perform all statistical analyses.

Results

Demographic characteristics and CVD risk factors of patients with SLE and controls are shown in Table 1. Total cholesterol was lower in the SLE group, as was LDL cholesterol and glucose, whereas homocysteine, hsCRP, sICAM-1, sE-selectin and hypertension were higher in SLE than in controls. Depressive symptoms were greater among SLE than controls, and a higher percentage of SLE was classified as depressed by CES-D compared with controls. In fact, when we evaluated risk factors for depression in the entire sample (n = 322), SLE patients were more likely to be depressed (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.06, 3.39; P = 0.03), independent of other depression risk factors, which were BMI (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00, 1.09; P = 0.03) and sICAM-1 (OR 1.00; 95% CI 1.001, 1.006; P = 0.02).

Table 1.
Demographic, risk factor and depression characteristics of SLE women and controlsa

SLE characteristics

Disease-related characteristics of the SLE sample are provided in Table 2. The average duration of SLE diagnosis was 16 years, and current SLE disease activity was mild, on average. The majority of patients (110 of 161) had used steroids, with a median duration of 10 years of use.

Table 2.
SLE characteristics of patients (n = 161)

CAC and CVD risk factors in SLE women and controls

Women with SLE had higher CAC scores than controls (P < 0.01) and were also more likely than controls to have any CAC (Table 1). Women with SLE had an increased odds of having any CAC compared with controls across all age groups (Fig. 1) (OR 1.68, P = 0.034).

Fig. 1.
Presence of CAC. Conditional logistic regression for overall difference in CAC for SLE and controls by age group: OR 1.68, P = 0.034.

Table 3 shows univariate associations between each of the CVD risk factors and CAC in the SLE and control groups. CAC was present in 48% of the SLE patients. In SLE, several traditional CVD risk factors were associated with CAC, including age, hypertension, adiposity and glucose metabolism factors. Inflammatory factors related to CAC were higher levels of hsCRP, sE-selectin and fibrinogen. Depression was more prevalent among SLE women with CAC (36.3%) than in those without CAC (17.9%) (P = 0.009). In terms of SLE disease characteristics, women with SLE who had any CAC, compared with those without CAC, had greater cumulative damage due to SLE and longer history of corticosteroid use. Among controls, the risk factors for CAC were nearly identical to those for SLE women, with the exception that sICAM-1 was associated with CAC, and depression was not associated with CAC in the controls.

Table 3.
Association of traditional risk factors, inflammatory markers, SLE disease characteristics and depression with CAC in SLE patients (n = 161) and controls (n = 161)

The final multivariable model of risk factors associated with the presence of CAC in SLE included older age, hypertensive status, triglycerides and sE-selectin and depression (Table 4). However, when BMI, which is a risk factor for both depression and CAC, was included in the model, depression status was no longer an independent contributor to CAC (OR 1.72; 95% CI 0.61, 4.89; P = 0.31).This suggests that the association between CAC and depression in SLE is potentially meditated by adiposity. Inclusion of BMI in the multivariable model also attenuated the association between sE-selectin and CAC (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99, 1.04; P = 0.17).

Table 4.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis of depression and risk factors with CAC in SLE (n = 161)

For comparison, we constructed a multivariable model of CAC in controls (results not shown in table). The variables that remained in the model were age (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.05, 1.16; P < 0.001) and BMI (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03, 1.19; P = 0.008). Thus, BMI appears to be a critical risk factor for CAC in controls as well as in SLE.

Discussion

Our study addressed the questions of whether depression is associated with CAC and CVD risk factors in women with SLE, and whether depression and CAC are greater in SLE women than control women. We found that women with SLE had greater depressive symptoms and higher prevalence and severity of CAC than healthy women. Depressive symptoms were similar to those found in other SLE investigations using the CES-D [40,42]. SLE women with depression (CES-D [gt-or-equal, slanted]16) were more than twice as likely to have CAC, independent of traditional CVD risk factors of age, hypertension, triglycerides and the inflammatory marker sE-selectin. This association between depression and CAC in SLE appears to be mediated by adiposity, however, because the addition of BMI to the multivariable model attenuated the depression–CAC link. BMI, a measure of adiposity, was an important risk factor in controls as well as SLE.

There are several pathways that may contribute to the associations between depression, adiposity and calcification in SLE. Depression may influence lifestyle factors such as poor diet and sedentary habits, which may contribute to weight gain. Conversely, high BMI may lead to reduced activity levels and depressed mood. In addition, the pain and fatigue that are nearly universal in SLE may further promote sedentary behaviour, and lead to depressive features such as low energy and anhedonia. Depression and adiposity are both associated with increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines [45], thereby potentially contributing to CVD risk by increasing inflammation. Additionally, low mood is one of the behavioural manifestations of inflammation and immune activation [46], so reports of depressive symptoms may be partially due to an inflammatory milieu. In SLE, which is characterized by systemic immune activation and inflammation, depressive symptoms and adiposity appear to contribute to the existing inflammatory burden of the disease.

Studies of CVD risks in healthy adults support a pathway between depression, weight and inflammation. These factors may function in a positive feedback fashion, where the interactions between depression, increased BMI and inflammation promote a vicious cycle, propagating each of these risk factors and CVD risk. In a structural equation modelling study of physically healthy adults, half of whom were clinically depressed, depression was found to promote accumulation of weight, which was associated with release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [47]. Further support for this mechanism is provided by a large (n = 6814) cross-sectional study [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)] in which depression and other psychosocial factors were associated with inflammatory markers, with BMI presumably playing a mediating role [48]. However, in the MESA study, depression was not associated with CAC [49]. A prospective investigation of a female cohort determined that the influence of recurrent major depressive disorder on CAC was independent of adiposity as measured by BMI [22]. However, concurrent depressive symptoms were not associated with CAC, which is consistent with our result for control women without SLE.

The limitations of this study are its cross-sectional design, sample size limitations and assessment of current depressive symptoms rather than lifetime history of mood disorder diagnosis. History of mood disorder may more accurately assess the burden of depression on physiology. However, strong associations between symptoms and depression diagnosis [50] suggest that current depressive symptoms may reflect enduring depressive disposition. Vascular changes presumably develop over years, and a prospective design in which depressive symptoms, adiposity and inflammation are measured over time, and mood disorder diagnostic history is obtained, could clarify or strengthen the associations found in the current study and provide important clues regarding causality and possible mechanisms. Because of the cross-sectional design of the current study, it is not possible to determine whether depression plays a causal role in the development of adiposity and inflammation, or vice versa. Interestingly, depression may also reflect CNS involvement from lupus. Depressive symptoms have been linked to serum antibody to N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor NR2 [51] and cognitive impairment as assessed by neuropsychological testing [52,53]. It is possible that depression may be a surrogate for lupus disease activity or severity.

The potential links between psychosocial factors and CVD in lupus remain largely unexplored. The present study provides support for the importance of depression assessment and suggests an association between depression and known CVD risk factors in SLE. Both depression and weight are modifiable risk factors. An important question for future investigation is whether treating depression can reduce CVD risk factors related to adiposity, and ultimately impact CVD outcomes.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is kep020b1.jpg

Acknowledgements

We thank the SLE women and control women for participating in this study.

Funding: This study was funded by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23 AR051314, R01 AR46588-01,K24 AR02213-01, K23 AR051044); National Center for Research Resources/General Clinical Research Center (M01 RR000056); American College of Rheumatology Research and Education Foundation (Health Professional Investigator Award, Physician Scientist Development Award).

Disclosure statement: N.D. is an employee of Lundbeck. S.M. has received the following research support: NIH 5 R01 AR46588-05, NIH 5 K24 AR002213-05. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Manzi S, Meilahn E, Rairie J, et al. Age-specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:408–15. [PubMed]
2. Manzi S, Selzer F, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of carotid plaque in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:51–60. [PubMed]
3. Esdaile J, Abrahamowicz M, Grodzicky T, et al. Traditional Framingham risk factors fail to fully account for accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:2331–7. [PubMed]
4. Ward M. Premature morbidity from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:338–46. [PubMed]
5. Roman M, Shanker B, Davis A, et al. Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2399–406. [PubMed]
6. Asanuma Y, Oeser A, Shintai A, et al. Premature coronary-artery atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2407–15. [PubMed]
7. Kuller L, Matthews K, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Coronary and aortic calcification among women 8 years after menopause and their premenopausal risk factors: the Healthy Women Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:2189–98. [PubMed]
8. Westerweel PE, Luyten RKMAC, Koomans HA, Derksen RHWM, Verhaar MC. Premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1384–96. [PubMed]
9. Bruce IN. ‘Not only … but also’: factors that contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology. 2005;44:1492–502. [PubMed]
10. Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Magder LS, Petri M. Predictors of carotid atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:2458–63. [PubMed]
11. Petri M, Perez-Gutthann S, Spence D, Hochberg M. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med. 1992;93:513–19. [PubMed]
12. Kiani AN, Magder L, Petri M. Coronary calcium in systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with traditional cardiovasccular risk factors, but not with disease activity. J Rheum. 2008;35:1300–6. [PubMed]
13. Ahmad Y, Shelmerdine J, Bodill H, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): the relative contribution of classic risk factors and the lupus phenotype. Rheumatology. 2007;46:983–8. [PubMed]
14. von Feldt J, Scalzi L, Cucchiara A, et al. Homocysteine levels and disease duration independently correlate with coronary artery calcification in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2220–7. [PubMed]
15. Asanuma Y, Chung CP, Oeser A, et al. Increased concentration of proatherogenic inflammatory cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus: relationship to cardiovascular risk factors [see comment] J Rheumatol. 2006;33:539–45. [PubMed]
16. Steptoe A, Hamer M, Chida Y. The effects of acute psychological stress on circulating inflammatory factors in humans: a review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2007;21:901–12. [PubMed]
17. Davis MC, Zautra AJ, Younger J, Motivala SJ, Attrep J, Irwin MR. Chronic stress and regulation of cellular markers of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for fatigue [see comment] Brain Behav Immun. 2008;22:24–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Miller GE, Stetler CA, Carney RM, Freedland KE, Banks WA. Clinical depression and inflammatory risk markers for coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1279–83. [PubMed]
19. Maes M, Van der Planken M, Van Gastel A, Desnyder R. Blood coagulation and platelet aggregation in major depression. J Affect Disord. 1996;40:35–40. [PubMed]
20. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115–26. [PubMed]
21. von Kanel R, Mills PJ, Fainman C, Dimsdale JE. Effects of psychological stress and psychiatric disorders on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis: a biobehavioral pathway to coronary artery disease? Psychosom Med. 2001;63:531–44. [PubMed]
22. Agatisa PK, Matthews KA, Bromberger JT, Edmundowicz D, Chang Y, Sutton-Tyrrell K. Coronary and aortic calcification in women with a history of major depression. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1229–36. [PubMed]
23. Mendes de Leon CF, Krumholz HM, Sreeman TS, et al. Depression and risk of coronary heart disease in elderly men and women: New Haven EPESE. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2341–8. [PubMed]
24. Ferketich AK, Schwartzbaum JA, Frid DJ, Moeschberger ML. Depression as an antecedent to heart disease among women and men in the NHANES I study. Circulation. 2000;102:630–5. [PubMed]
25. Nery FG, Borba EF, Hatch JP, Soares JC, Bonfa E, Neto FL. Major depressive disorder and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Compr Psychiatry. 2007;48:14–19. [PubMed]
26. Sundquist K, Li X, Hemminki K, Sundquist J. Subsequent risk of hospitalization for neuropsychiatric disorders in patients with rheumatic diseases. Arch Intern Med. 2008;65:501–7. [PubMed]
27. Kozora E, Ellison MC, West S. Depression, fatigue, and pain in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): relationship to the American College of Rheumatology SLE neuropsychological battery. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:628–35. [PubMed]
28. Stoll T, Gordon C, Seifert B, et al. Consistency and validity of patient administered assessment of quality of life by the MOS SF-36; its association with disease activity and damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:1608–14. [PubMed]
29. Gilboe I, Kvien TK, Husby G. Health status in systemic lupus erythematosus compared to rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:1694–700. [PubMed]
30. Ives DG, Fitzpatrick AL, Bild DE, et al. Surveillance and ascertainment of cardiovascular events. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1995;5:278–85. [PubMed]
31. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982;25:1271–7. [PubMed]
32. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus [see comment] Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1725. [PubMed]
33. Dessein PH, Joffe BI. Insulin resistance and impaired beta cell function in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2765–75. [PubMed]
34. Macy EM, Hayes TE, Tracy RP. Variability in the measurement of C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: implications for reference intervals and epidemiological applications. Clin Chem. 1997;43:52–8. [PubMed]
35. Cushman M, Cornell ES, Howard PR, Bovill EG, Tracy RP. Laboratory methods and quality assurance in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Clin Chem. 1995;41:264–70. [PubMed]
36. Liang M, Socher S, Larson M, Schur P. Reliability and validity of six systems for the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1989;32:1107–18. [PubMed]
37. Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH. Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:630–40. [PubMed]
38. Gladman D, Ginzler E, Goldsmith C, et al. The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:363–9. [PubMed]
39. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.
40. Ward MM, Marx AS, Barry NN. Psychological distress and changes in the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology. 2002;41:184–8. [PubMed]
41. Wang B, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB. Fatigue in lupus is not correlated with disease activity. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:892–5. [PubMed]
42. Trupin L, Tonner MC, Yazdany J, et al. The role of neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status in outcomes of systemic luups erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1782–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Agatston A, Janowitz W, Hildner F, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–32. [PubMed]
44. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:340–9. [PubMed]
45. Ladwig K-H, Marten-Mittag B, Lowel H, Doring A, Keonig W. Influence of depressive mood on the association of CRP and obesity in 3205 middle aged healthy men. Brain Behav Immun. 2003;17:268–75. [PubMed]
46. Raison CL, Capuron L, Miller AH. Cytokines sing the blues: inflammation and the pathogenesis of depression. Trends Immunol. 2006;27:24–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Miller GE, Freedland KE, Carney RM, Stetler CA, Banks WA. Pathways linking depression, adiposity, and inflammatory markers in healthy young adults. Brain Behav Immun. 2003;17:276–85. [PubMed]
48. Ranjit N, Diez-Roux AV, Shea S, et al. Psychosocial factors and inflammation in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:174–81. [PubMed]
49. Diez Roux AV, Ranjit N, Powell L, et al. Psychosocial factors and coronary calcium in adults without clinical cardiovascular disease. [(see comment) summary for patients in Ann Intern Med 2006;144:I28; PMID: 16754919] Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:822–31. [PubMed]
50. Zonderman AB, Herbst JH, Schmidt C, Jr, Costa PT, Jr, McCrae RR. Depressive symptoms as a nonspecific, graded risk for psychiatric diagnoses. J Abnormal Psychol. 1993;102:544–52. [PubMed]
51. Lapteva L, Nowak M, Yarboro CH, et al. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies, cognitive dysfunction, and depression in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2505–14. [PubMed]
52. McLaurin EY, Holliday SL, Williams P, Brey RL. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Neurology. 2005;64:297–303. [PubMed]
53. Kozora E, Laudenslager M, Lemieux A, West SG. Inflammatory and hormonal measures predict neuropsychological functioning in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:745–54. [PubMed]

Articles from Rheumatology (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press