Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of mbcLink to Publisher's site
Mol Biol Cell. Apr 15, 2009; 20(8): 2286–2296.
PMCID: PMC2669035
The Cellular Concentration of the Yeast Ure2p Prion Protein Affects Its Propagation as a Prion
Myriam Crapeau,* Christelle Marchal,* Christophe Cullin, and Laurent Mailletcorresponding author
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095 Institut de Biochimie et de Génétique Cellulaires, Bordeaux, F-33077 France; and Université Victor Ségalen Bordeaux2, Bordeaux, F-33077 France
Jonathan Chernoff, Monitoring Editor
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Address correspondence to: Laurent Maillet (laurent.maillet/at/
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received November 4, 2008; Revised February 6, 2009; Accepted February 9, 2009.
The [URE3] yeast prion is a self-propagating inactive form of the Ure2p protein. We show here that Ure2p from the species Saccharomyces paradoxus (Ure2pSp) can be efficiently converted into a prion form and propagate [URE3] when expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at physiological level. We found however that Ure2pSp overexpression prevents efficient prion propagation. We have compared the aggregation rate and propagon numbers of Ure2pSp and of S. cerevisiae Ure2p (Ure2pSc) in [URE3] cells both at different expression levels. Overexpression of both Ure2p orthologues accelerates formation of large aggregates but Ure2pSp aggregates faster than Ure2pSc. Although the yeast cells that contain these large Ure2p aggregates do not transmit [URE3] to daughter cells, the corresponding crude extract retains the ability to induce [URE3] in wild-type [ure3-0] cells. At low expression level, propagon numbers are higher with Ure2pSc than with Ure2pSp. Overexpression of Ure2p decreases the number of [URE3] propagons with Ure2pSc. Together, our results demonstrate that the concentration of a prion protein is a key factor for prion propagation. We propose a model to explain how prion protein overexpression can produce a detrimental effect on prion propagation and why Ure2pSp might be more sensitive to such effects than Ure2pSc.
Prions were originally defined as a unique class of infectious agents composed solely of protein. In mammals, prions cause fatal neurodegenerative diseases, such as Creutzfeldt–Jacob disease in human, sheep scrapie, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (Prusiner et al., 1982 blue right-pointing triangle; Aguzzi et al., 2007 blue right-pointing triangle; Collinge and Clarke, 2007 blue right-pointing triangle). All these diseases are linked to abnormal self-propagating conformations of a cellular protein termed PrP. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae possesses at least four different prion proteins (Sup35, Ure2p, Rnq1p, and Swi1p) that can generate phenotypes ([PSI+], [URE3], [PIN+] and [SWI+], respectively) as a direct consequence of an inherited conformational change (Wickner, 1994 blue right-pointing triangle; Derkatch et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle; Du et al., 2008 blue right-pointing triangle). Yeast prions are denoted within brackets and by capital letters to specify that they correspond to cytoplasmically transmitted inheritable elements that are dominant in genetic crosses. The yeast prion proteins exhibit clear mechanistic similarities with PrP. In particular, mammalian and yeast prions have the ability to polymerize into amyloid aggregates (for reviews, see Baskakov, 2007 blue right-pointing triangle; Wickner et al., 2007 blue right-pointing triangle). Interestingly, biochemical pathways controlling prion formation and/or maintenance seem conserved from yeast to humans because antiprion drugs, isolated in yeast-based screening assays, inhibit mammalian prion propagation and vice versa (Bach et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle).
Numerous results highlight the clear connection between the yeast prion phenotype and the aggregation of the protein involved in this process (Patino et al., 1996 blue right-pointing triangle; Edskes et al., 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Paushkin et al., 1997 blue right-pointing triangle; Zhou et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle). Reconstitution of in vivo infectivity from amyloid fibers formed in vitro from purified protein has definitively proven the protein-only hypothesis for prion formation and established indubitably the link between amyloid fibers and the prion form propagated in cells (Tanaka et al., 2004 blue right-pointing triangle, 2006 blue right-pointing triangle; Brachmann et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle; King and Diaz-Avalos, 2004 blue right-pointing triangle; Patel and Liebman, 2007 blue right-pointing triangle). Other proteins form amyloids in an autocatalytic manner, but only prion proteins are infectious. The exact nature of the self-propagating species still remains unclear. Indeed, the Ure2p aggregates isolated from [URE3] cells differ from amyloid filaments formed in vitro (Ripaud et al., 2004 blue right-pointing triangle). Genetics studies on yeast prions have revealed the existence of cellular factors required for prion aggregation and propagation. Notably, the de novo appearance and subsequent propagation of yeast prions is highly dependent on the expression levels of a number of molecular chaperones (reviewed in Perrett and Jones, 2008 blue right-pointing triangle). Biochemical analysis of [PSI+] propagating yeast extracts showed that Ssa1/Ssa2 chaperones were the major components interacting with infectious Sup35 aggregates (Bagriantsev et al., 2008 blue right-pointing triangle).
To ensure an efficient transmission of prion in actively dividing cultures, prion aggregates must be continually subdivided to yield additional replication templates known as prion seeds or propagons. The disaggregating Hsp104 chaperone has the most critical and universal role in yeast prion maintenance, and it is essential to remodel existing prion complexes to generate or maintain propagons (Chernoff et al., 1995 blue right-pointing triangle; Satpute-Krishnan et al., 2007 blue right-pointing triangle). Then, propagons are partitioned to daughter cells, where they continue to direct the conversion of neosynthesized protein to the prion form and ensure inheritance of the associated phenotype.
The Ure2p prion protein controls catabolism of nitrogen sources. In the presence of a good nitrogen source, Ure2p blocks the uptake of poor nitrogen sources by sequestering the transcription factor Gln3p in the cytoplasm (Beck and Hall, 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Cox et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). One of these genes activated by Gln3p is the allantoate permease gene, DAL5 (Turoscy and Cooper, 1987 blue right-pointing triangle). Because of the structural similarity between allantoate and ureidosuccinate (USA), an essential intermediate of uracil biosynthesis, Dal5p can take up USA (Aigle and Lacroute, 1975 blue right-pointing triangle). Prion conversion of Ure2p leads to its loss of function and consequently, enables the uptake of ureidosuccinate (USA) and permits growth on an ad hoc selective medium. Ure2p is a two-domain protein. The asparagine and glutamine rich N-terminal domain of Ure2p, termed prion-forming domain, is unstructured in the soluble form of the protein and is crucial for prion properties, whereas its C-terminal domain is compactly folded and sufficient to perform the cellular function in nitrogen regulation (Masison and Wickner, 1995 blue right-pointing triangle). Although the catalytic function of Ure2p in nitrogen regulation was found to be conserved among all analyzed Saccharomyces species, controversial results were obtained concerning the conservation of prion-forming properties (Edskes and Wickner, 2002 blue right-pointing triangle; Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). In particular, we did not detect [URE3] prion capacity with Ure2p from Saccharomyces paradoxus (Ure2pSp), whereas H. Edskes and coworkers reported that this protein could form a prion. The conflicting studies differed in two experimental aspects. One difference was the expression level of Ure2p in yeast cells, the other was the existence of a silent mutation in the construct used by Edskes et al. that could lead to an artifactual translational read-through of URE2 (Talarek et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle).
De novo prion generation is a stochastic process. Transient overproduction of the prion protein increases the frequency of prion formation (Wickner, 1994 blue right-pointing triangle; Derkatch et al., 1996 blue right-pointing triangle). This property was proposed by R. Wickner as one of the indicators that a heritable non-Mendelian state is due to a prion-based determinant and is now regarded as a fundamental property of such systems (for review, see Wickner et al., 2006 blue right-pointing triangle). The rationale behind this argument is simply that a higher concentration of the protein enhances the probability of prion nucleation. However, high amounts of prion protein can also interfere with propagation (Edskes et al., 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Ripaud et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle; Allen et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle). For example, high overexpression of Ure2p leads to curing of the [URE3] prion. A complex relationship apparently exists between prion properties and the amount of the prion protein. In the present work, we wondered whether the concentration of Ure2p could interfere with its prion properties. We report here that, when expressed at physiological level, Ure2pSp can convert into the prion form either spontaneously or after contact with preexisting [URE3]. But, we show that the Ure2p concentration controls the ability to induce and propagate [URE3]. We found that the number of [URE3] propagons is lower when propagated with Ure2pSp than with Ure2pSc and diminishes with increase of the cellular concentration of Ure2p. Together, our results suggest that the aggregation dynamics of Ure2p and [URE3] propagation depends both on the expression level of Ure2p and on the sequence of the prion-forming domain. This work shows that concentration of a prion protein contributes to determine its prion properties.
To avoid confusion, we used S. cerevisiae (Sc) or Saccharomyces paradoxus (Sp) in subscript to specify the gene origin. For prion nomenclature, [ure3-0] is used to name the soluble or nonprion status of Ure2p and [URE3] is used to name the prion status.
Plasmids and DNA Manipulations
All plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. The full-length URE2 open reading frames (ORFs) of the S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus are placed under control of the inducible GAL10-CYC1 promoter and are carried either by the monocopy plasmid (with an ARS-CEN origin of replication) pG1URE2Sc and pG1URE2Sp or by the multicopy plasmid (with a 2μ origin of replication) pG2URE2Sc and pG2URE2Sp. The multicopy plasmids pG2URE2Sc-green fluorescent protein (GFP) and pG2URE2Sp-GFP were originally described by Ripaud et al. (2003) blue right-pointing triangle and Immel et al. (2007) blue right-pointing triangle, respectively. pFL39-URE2Sp, containing the URE2Sp ORF flanked by promoter and terminator sequence of URE2Sc, was constructed as follows. The URE2Sp ORF was amplified using oligonucleotide 37 (5′-GTCATATTGTTTTAAGCTGCAAATTAAGTTGTACACCAAATGATGAATAACAACGGTAAC-3′), which introduces a sequence homologous to the URE2Sc promoter at the 5′ of the gene and oligonucleotide 41 (5′-TTTCCTCCTTCTTCTTTCTTTCTTGTTTTTAAAGCAGCCTTTATTCACCACGCAATGCCTT-3′), which introduces a sequence homologous to the URE2Sc terminator at the 3′ of the gene. This fragment was cloned into the pFL39URE2Sc, carrying a genomic fragment of URE2Sc, by using the gap repair method (Orr-Weaver and Szostak, 1983 blue right-pointing triangle).
Table 1.
Table 1.
Plasmids used in this study
Strains, Media, and Genetic Methods
All strains used in this study are disrupted for the URA2 gene. S. cerevisiae strain CC30 (MATα, trp1-1, ade2-1, leu2-3, 112, his3-11, 15, Δura2::HIS3) was used as the [ure3-0] parent and is termed URE2Sc in this publication (Fernandez-Bellot et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). The strain AB34, termed here URE2Sc [URE3], is isogenic to URE2Sc and carries the [URE3] strain originally described by Aigle and Lacroute (1975) blue right-pointing triangle that was transmitted by cytoduction. To integrate the URE2Sp ORF into the URE2 locus of S. cerevisiae, the AF36 strain (MATa, trp1-1, ade2-1, leu2-3, 112, his3-11, 15, Δura2::HIS3, cyh2r, Δure2::CYH2) (Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle) was transformed with a SacI-PstI fragment from pFL39-URE2Sp. The substitution of the CYH2 allele from the URE2Sc locus in the AF36 strain leads to cycloheximide resistance. For this reason, integrative transformants were selected on YPD medium supplemented with 1 μg/ml cycloheximide. The resulting strain was named AF30 and backcrossed successively three times with URE2Sc to create strain URE2Sp (MATα, trp1-1, ade2-1, leu2-3, 112, his3-11, 15, Δura2::HIS3, PURE2Sc::URE2Sp). The strain URE2Sp [URE3] is isogenic to URE2Sc, and it propagates the [URE3] strain introduced by crossing from URE2Sc [URE3]. URE2Sc and URE2Sp ORFs were discriminated by NotI restriction of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment generated using oligonucleotides 214 5′-GATGAATAACAACGGCAACC-3′ and 220 5′-CCGTAAACTCTTCTAACCTC-3′).
Growth and handling of S. cerevisiae involved standard techniques. Standard yeast media have been described previously (Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). Induction of protein expression under control of GAL10 promoter was performed by growth in medium containing either 4% raffinose or 2% galactose + 4% raffinose as the carbon source. The [URE3]/USA+ phenotype of ura2 strains was tested on a minimal medium containing ammonium as the nitrogen source and supplemented with appropriate amino acids and 15 mg/ml USA. Strains were cured of the [URE3] prion by growth on YPDA medium supplemented with 3 mM guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl).
Quantifying the [URE3] Prion Formation
To evaluate spontaneous prion apparition, serial 10-fold dilution of cells were plated on medium supplemented with USA or with uracil. Colonies were counted after incubation for 3 d at 30°C for plates containing uracil and after incubation for 5 d for plates supplemented with USA. Frequency of USA+ colony formation was calculated as the ratio of the number of colonies on USA to number of colonies on uracil. To determine the induction rate of transient overexpression of Ure2p on prion formation, cells were grown for 3 d in medium containing 2% galactose and 2% raffinose dropout medium lacking leucine. Frequency of USA+ colony formation was determined as described above on SD medium lacking leucine supplemented with USA or with uracil. All frequencies indicated in this work were determined as the average of at least five independent experiments. To rule out a potential masking of the [URE3] phenotype on dextrose medium supplemented with USA, because of the presence of residual Ure2p after induction on galactose medium, cells were grown on dextrose medium supplemented with uracil for 2 d before selection of USA+ colonies. This supplementary step allows growth of the cells and dilution of any remaining Ure2p. By this approach, the obtained results led to the same conclusions as when selection of USA+ colonies was performed immediately after the transient overexpression of Ure2p.
[URE3] Curing by Guanidine Hydrochloride and Counting Propagons
After overnight growth on YPD (except for URE2Sc pG1URE2Sc which were grown on 2% YPGalactose), cells were grown in YPD with 3 mM GuHCl. Cultures were maintained in exponential growth (between 0.1 and 1 OD600) by successive dilutions into liquid YPD medium with 3 mM GuHCl. At regular time points, aliquots of cultures were withdrawn and plated on SD medium supplemented either with uracil or with USA. The frequency of USA+ colonies was determined as described above. The number of propagons was derived from the kinetics of GuHCl-induced prion curing according to Cox et al. (2003) blue right-pointing triangle. The data are plotted as the percentage of [URE3] cells as a function of generations of growth in YPD + GuHCl. The number of propagons can be calculated from the value of 2g, where g is the number of generations elapsed at the time point when 36.8% of cells had lost the prion, assuming that the propagon number halves at each generation.
Protein Extraction, Sedimentation Analysis, and Western Blotting
Total yeast extracts (glass beads disruption with Fast-prep24 [MP Biomedicals, Irvine CA] in TNT buffer: 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.2% Triton X), sedimentation analyses, Western blotting and treatment with antibodies were performed as described previously (Ripaud et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle; Immel et al., 2007 blue right-pointing triangle). Before heating at 95°C, urea was added to a 8 M final concentration to the loading buffer of all extracts from yeast cells propagating the prion. To measure the amount of Ure2p in various strains, yeast extracts were prepared by alkaline lysis. Briefly, 5 OD600 units of yeast cells in exponential phase were permeabilized with 1 ml of 0.185 M NaOH, 0.2% mercaptoethanol for 10 min on ice. Trichloroacetic acid was added to a final concentration of 5%, and the samples were incubated for an additional 10 min on ice. Precipitates were collected by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 5 min. The pellets were neutralized and dissolved in 30 μl of dissociation buffer (4% SDS, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 4 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, 2% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.02% bromphenol blue) and 15 μl of 1 M Tris base, and heated at 95°C for 5 min. One to 5 μl was loaded onto a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Western blotting and immunoblotting with Ure2p and Ade13p antibodies were performed as described previously (Ripaud et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). Signal intensity was quantified using the Amount One software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Microscopy Techniques
URE2Sc and URE2Sp cells propagating [URE3] were transformed with the pG2URE2Sc-GFP and pG2URE2Sp-GFP plasmids, respectively. Cells were grown on YNB medium (0.67%) supplemented with 2% dextrose, appropriate amino acids, and 15 mg/l USA to 0.8–1 OD600. Cells were washed and suspended in YNB medium (0.67%) supplemented with 4% raffinose or 2% galactose. Cells were then pelleted at different times and resuspended in DABCO maintaining solution (218 mM diazabicyclo 2–2-2 octane [Sigma-Aldrich], 25%, vol/vol phosphate-buffered saline, and 75%, vol/vol glycerol). Cells were observed and photographed with a DMRB microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a 100× HCX PL fluotar objective.
Preparation of Yeast Extract and Test of [URE3] Infectivity
Yeast extract were prepared as described in the supplemental experimental procedures of Brachmann et al. (2005) blue right-pointing triangle. URE2Sc pG2URE2Sc-GFP cells propagating [URE3] were grown as described above for microscopy analyzes. Approximately 150 OD of cells were resuspended in 250 μl of ST buffer (1.2 M sorbitol and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) and disrupted with 0.5-mm glass beads in ice for 20 s using the Fast-prep24 (MP Biomedicals). Whole cells extract were briefly clarified at 500 × g for 30 s.
Yeast extract were transformed into [ure3-0] cells as described in the supplemental experimental procedures of Shorter and Lindquist (2006) blue right-pointing triangle. Briefly, spheroplasts were recovered from URE2Sc yeast cells after digestion with lyticase (L-5263; Sigma-Aldrich). Spheroplasts were resuspended in STC buffer (1.2 M sorbitol, 10 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) and mixed with yeast extracts (15 μl of whole cells extracts for 100 μl of spheroplasts suspension), a LEU2 plasmid (pRS426; 0.02 mg/ml), and salmon sperm DNA (0.1 mg/ml). Fusion was induced by addition of 9 volumes of polyethylene glycol (PEG) buffer (20%, wt/vol PEG8000, 10 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). Then, 330 Leu+ transformants were spotted onto SD supplemented with USA. To ensure USA+ colonies corresponded to [URE3], test for curing of the USA+ phenotype were carried out by streaking cells for single colonies onto YPD containing 3 mM guanidine HCl and then checked for the loss of USA+ phenotype. The numbers of [URE3] colonies relative to total transformants was then determined. A negative control without extracts was performed, which only rarely gave rise to spontaneous [URE3] clones. To make sure that potential surviving cells from yeast extract did not yield false positives in transformation experiments, we platted the cells extracts (incubated without pRS426 by using the transformation procedure described above) and have verified that it did not yield Leu+ colonies.
Ure2pSp Can Adopt a Prion Form When Expressed at Physiological Level
To determine whether Ure2pSp can sustain [URE3] propagation when it is expressed at physiological level, we constructed an S. cerevisiae strain in which the URE2Sp ORF was integrated at the URE2 locus under control of the endogenous URE2Sc promoter (this strain is termed URE2Sp). The expression of Ure2pSp was similar to that of Ure2pSc, as determined by Western blotting (Figure 1A). As reported previously, Ure2pSp can perform the nitrogen catabolism repression function of Ure2pSc, and as a consequence, the URE2Sp strain shows a USA phenotype (Figure 1B) (Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle).
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Ure2pSp can form and propagate the [URE3] prion. The URE2Sp open reading frame was inserted in place of the URE2Sc open reading frame at the resident URE2 locus to create a URE2Sp strain. (A) Comparative analysis of expression levels of Ure2pSp and Ure2p (more ...)
We wondered whether the Ure2pSp protein could be converted into a prion form in the presence of preexisting [URE3]. For that purpose, we crossed the URE2Sp strain with a URE2Sc strain propagating [URE3]. The resulting URE2Sp × URE2Sc [URE3] diploids displayed the USA+ phenotype, whereas the URE2Sp × URE2Sc [ure3-0] diploid remain wild type for Ure2p function (Figure 1B). To determine whether [URE3] could be transmitted to cells expressing only Ure2pSp, we analyzed the meiotic progeny of the [URE3] diploid. We observed a non-Mendelian inheritance of the USA+ phenotype (Figure 1C). This USA+ phenotype segregated independently of the URE2Sc or URE2Sp alleles (determined by PCR analysis; data not shown). USA+ phenotypes were cured after growth on YPD medium containing 3 mM GuHCl. We conclude from these results that Ure2pSp can propagate the [URE3] prion.
The aggregation and resulting insolubility of Ure2p are hallmarks of the [URE3] prion state (Edskes et al., 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Ripaud et al., 2004 blue right-pointing triangle). To characterize biochemically the prion form of Ure2pSp, we analyzed the solubility of Ure2pSp in USA+ cells by cellular fractionation after ultracentrifugation of yeast extracts. We found that Ure2pSp is specifically aggregated in [URE3] cells (Figure 2A). Furthermore, the cellular distribution of Ure2pSp was monitored by GFP fluorescence. For that purpose, URE2Sp [ure3-0] and [URE3] strains were transformed with a plasmid expressing an inducible fusion of Ure2pSp and the green fluorescent protein (Ure2pSp-GFP). Induction of Ure2pSp-GFP expression in cells containing [URE3] led primarily to a punctuate fluorescence pattern, whereas [ure3-0] cells displayed diffuse fluorescence (Figure 2B). These data indicate that the [URE3] prion of Ure2pSp corresponds to a self-propagating aggregate.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Biochemical and cellular characterization of the [URE3] prion propagated by Ure2pSp. (A) Sedimentation analysis of Ure2pSp in a URE2pSp strain with or without [URE3]. S, supernatant fraction, P, pellet fraction. Fractions were analyzed by Western blot (more ...)
Together, these results show that Ure2pSp can propagate the [URE3] prion. We next wondered whether Ure2pSp can also promote spontaneously [URE3] formation, because apparition and propagation of yeast prion could be mediated by distinct mechanisms (Derkatch et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle; Zhou et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle; Bradley and Liebman, 2004 blue right-pointing triangle). Frequency of USA+ formation was determined for a URE2Sp strain. Spontaneous USA+ formation occurred at about the same rate as in URE2Sc cells (~2 in 105 cells) (Figure 1D). The majority of the USA+ cells were cured in presence of 3 mM GuHCl. As expected, when reselected on USA-containing medium, USA+ clones occurred in such cured clones at a similar frequency as in the original cells (data not shown). We conclude from this set of experiments that when expressed at physiological level, Ure2pSp can spontaneously form [URE3] and stably propagate it.
High Overexpression of Ure2pSp Abolishes Its Prion Properties
In apparent contradiction with the results reported in the previous section, we had reported previously that Ure2pSp is not able to convert into the [URE3] prion form (Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle; Talarek et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle). Because the only difference between the present experiment and these previous studies was the use of different promoters, we wondered whether the capacity to support prion propagation could be dependent on Ure2p cellular concentration. So, we expressed different amounts of Ure2pSc and Ure2pSp in URE2Sc and URE2Sp [URE3] cells, respectively. We used monocopy or multicopy plasmids carrying the URE2Sc or URE2Sp ORF under control of the GAL10 promoter. After growth in galactose medium, the amount of Ure2p was quantified by Western blotting experiments (Figure 3A). Monocopy and multicopy plasmids led to approximately a 50- and a 500-fold overexpression, respectively, compared with Ure2p expressed from URE2 at the chromosomal locus. It was noted that the amount of Ure2pSp is slightly higher than Ure2pSc regardless of the promoter. S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Ure2p share the exact same sequence in their globular domains, and the differences are restricted to the prion-forming domain (Supplemental Figure S1) (Edskes and Wickner, 2002 blue right-pointing triangle; Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). Because this domain is essential to stabilize the catalytic domain of Ure2p (Shewmaker et al., 2007 blue right-pointing triangle), the sequence differences in the prion-forming domain sequence between two orthologues might result in distinct stability of Ure2p.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Overproduction of Ure2pSp suppresses [URE3] prion properties. (A) Estimation of Ure2pSc and Ure2pSp quantities. URE2Sc and URE2Sp alleles were placed under control of GAL10-inducible promoter and carried by a monocopy (pG1) or a multicopy (pG2) plasmids. (more ...)
We then tested the ability of the yeast cells to propagate [URE3] by testing their capacity to grow on galactose medium containing USA. As a control, we confirmed that the transformation per se did not impair the prion phenotype (Figure 3B, SD+USA). As published previously, a strong overexpression of Ure2pSc is compatible with growth on USA medium, whereas a very strong overexpression of Ure2pSp is not (Figure 3B, SG+USA) (Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). Intermediate overexpression of Ure2pSc or Ure2pSp did not affect [URE3] propagation (Figure 3B, SG+USA). The observation that Ure2pSp overexpression led to severe inhibition of prion propagation contrasts with the fact that transient overexpression of Ure2p increases the frequency of prion formation (Wickner, 1994 blue right-pointing triangle; Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). So, we have also determined the effect of massive Ure2pSp transient overexpression on [URE3] formation. We transiently expressed various amounts of Ure2pSc or Ure2pSp. Prion apparition was assayed as formation of USA+ colonies on a dextrose medium (Figure 3C). As reported previously, an increase of Ure2pSc promoted the appearance of [URE3] at a higher frequency (Wickner, 1994 blue right-pointing triangle). The difference in the induction rate was not statistically significant when Ure2pSc was overexpressed either from a monocopy or multicopy plasmid. A mild overproduction of Ure2pSp also led to a high induction of [URE3] formation. In contrast, such an induction rate was not observed after a high transient overexpression of Ure2pSp. We got the same results when transient overexpressions were performed in a URE2Sp strain (data not shown).
Overall, our results indicate that prion formation rate is not strictly correlated with the expression level of Ure2pSc or Ure2pSp and in particular that high overexpression of Ure2pSp dramatically lowers [URE3] formation rate.
Ure2pSp and Ure2pSc Aggregate in [URE3] Cells in an Ordered Pathway
Given that there are clear links between the yeast prion phenotype and the aggregation of the protein involved in this process, we decided to compare the aggregation dynamics of Ure2pSp and Ure2pSc in vivo. To that purpose, we used the Ure2p-GFP protein that when induced in [URE3] cells, decorates the preexisting prion aggregates and allows their visualization (Fernandez-Bellot et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). The expression system is based on high copy number plasmids, the coding sequence of Ure2pSc-GFP or Ure2pSp-GFP being under the control of the inducible galactose promoter. Different patterns of aggregation, which were never detected in [ure3-0] cells, were observed. We grouped these patterns in four classes (Figure 4). We distinguish cells with small numerous foci quoted as the small aggregates class. We also observed cells with one large dot among smaller foci (medium aggregates class). The two other classes of aggregation are branching structures in which elongations are short (large aggregates) or long (very large aggregates). Formation of these distinct aggregates was not due to the overexpression of the Ure2pSc-GFP construct itself because the same results were obtained when a low expression level of the Ure2pSc-GFP fusion was used to decorate the Ure2p aggregates (Supplemental Figure S2).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Classes of Ure2p-GFP aggregates in [URE3] cells. [URE3] cells were transformed with multicopy pG2URE2Sc-GFP and pG2URE2Sp-GFP plasmids. The cells were grown overnight on dextrose medium supplemented with USA. In exponential phase (OD600 = 1), the cells (more ...)
We quantified the proportion of each of the four defined classes at different times after the induction of the expression of the fluorescent protein in a cell population (Figure 5A). The switch from dextrose to galactose medium was realized during late exponential phase. Because of the metabolic transition in this condition, less than one generation occurs during the first 24 h. We thus consider that we are dealing with a nondividing cell population. For each observation, at least two classes coexisted, but their ratio changed during the kinetics. Immediately after the induction of Ure2pSc-GFP or Ure2pSp-GFP, most cells belong to the small aggregates class. Few hours later, the proportion of this class has a clear tendency to decrease, and more cells with medium aggregates class were observed. Finally, after a longer induction time, these two classes have completely disappeared and the branching structures were observed (large and very large aggregates class). In individual cells we never observed large aggregates and small aggregates together. The number of visible aggregates in each cell decreased in the course of expression of Ure2p-Gfp, suggesting a coalescence of Ure2p aggregates. The simplest interpretation of these observations is that Ure2pSp and Ure2pSc aggregate in the same ordered pathway in [URE3] cells and that the observed aggregates types derive from each other leading to aggregates of increasing size and in decreasing number.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Aggregation dynamics of Ure2p-GFP in [URE3] cells. [URE3] cells were transformed with multicopy pG2URE2Sc-GFP and pG2URE2Sp-GFP plasmids. The cells were grown overnight on dextrose medium supplemented with USA. In exponential phase (OD600 = 1), the cells (more ...)
High Overexpression of Ure2p Accelerates the Aggregation Dynamics of Ure2p
We have demonstrated that the [URE3] prion properties depend on the amount of Ure2p. We therefore studied the aggregation kinetics of Ure2pSc and Ure2pSp at two distinct cellular concentrations of Ure2pSc-GFP and Ure2pSp-GFP. To this purpose, we have induced the expression either with raffinose or raffinose + galactose as the carbon source. Raffinose, contrary to dextrose, does not repress the GAL10 promoter, allowing a weak expression of the protein. In this condition, the proportion of cells containing small aggregates decreased slowly with both orthologues (Figure 5B). Indeed, ~40% of the cells still correspond to the small aggregates class 24 h after the onset of induction. In contrast, when fluorescent proteins were overexpressed by inducing with galactose, this cell population had totally disappeared 9 h after the induction of overexpression. Moreover, in overexpression conditions, we observed emergence of cells with large aggregates as soon as 6 h after the onset of induction, whereas they were never formed when Ure2pSc-GFP or Ure2pSp-GFP was expressed at low levels. These results show that the concentration of cellular Ure2p influences its aggregation dynamics in [URE3] cells.
We also observed that, in galactose + raffinose medium, there is a significant difference in the aggregation dynamic of Ure2pSc-GFP and Ure2pSp-GFP (Figure 5A). The proportion of cells exhibiting small aggregates decreases more rapidly with Ure2pSp-GFP. In fact, 6 h after galactose induction, 58% of cells expressing Ure2pSc-GFP contained small aggregates, whereas the proportion of this population was only 12% with Ure2pSp-GFP. Moreover, Ure2pSp-GFP formed large aggregates more efficiently than Ure2pSc-GFP because after 24 h, 92% of the cells expressing Ure2pSp-GFP contained these particular aggregates compared with 35% for cells expressing Ure2pSc-GFP. In fact, at all time points, aggregates were larger in Ure2pSp-GFP than in Ure2pSc-GFP–expressing cells. These results clearly demonstrated that the aggregation dynamics rely not only on the cellular concentration of the prion protein but also on its primary sequence.
The Aggregation Dynamics of Ure2p Defines the Number of [URE3] Propagons
We wondered whether the differences in aggregation dynamics of Ure2p in [URE3] cells (URE2Sc, URE2Sc overexpressing Ure2p and URE2Sp strains) could be correlated with variations in the number of [URE3] propagons per cell. We have estimated the number of [URE3] propagons by the method described by Eaglestone et al. (2000) blue right-pointing triangle. This analysis is based on chemical inactivation of Hsp104 by low concentrations of GuHCl that inhibits prion replication and thus leads to rapid prion loss in dividing cells by progressive dilution of the propagons (Eaglestone et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle; Ferreira et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle). [URE3] strains (URE2Sc, URE2Sc overexpressing Ure2p and URE2Sp strains) were transferred during log phase into YPD medium supplemented with 3 mM GuHCl; at regular time points, cells density was determined and cultures were spread on plates to determine the percentage of [URE3] loss. In the strain overexpressing Ure2pSc, the overexpression was stopped when cells were transferred into YPD supplemented with 3 mM GuHCl.
As expected, the kinetics of [URE3] curing displayed two phases; there was a lag phase during which no curing occurred followed by a linear increase in the number of cured cells over time (Figure 6) (Eaglestone et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle; Ripaud et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). The curing profile for the [URE3] URE2Sc strain was much slower than that observed in either the [URE3] URE2Sc strain overexpressing Ure2pSc or the [URE3] URE2Sp strain. For the two latter strains, the elimination of [URE3] was so fast that the lag phase was not always apparent in the four performed independent curing kinetics (Figure 6). The number of propagons in [URE3] cells can be inferred from these kinetics of elimination. From the method developed by B. Cox (Cox et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle), we estimate the apparent number of propagons to be 52 for [URE3] URE2Sc strain. This number is much larger than that found for either [URE3] URE2Sp or [URE3] URE2Sc overexpressing Ure2p (15 and 10 propagons, respectively). These results show that the number of propagons is influenced by the primary sequence of the Ure2p prion-forming domain, and remarkably, that an increase of cellular concentration of Ure2p decreases the number of propagons. In other terms, we have correlated a variation of aggregation dynamic of Ure2p with variations in the numbers of [URE3] propagons.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Kinetics of [URE3] elimination following guanidine hydrochloride treatment. [URE3] cells were grown in YPD supplemented with 3 mM guanidine hydrochloride as described in Materials and Methods. At regular time points, cultured aliquots were removed, and (more ...)
Infectivity of Ure2p Aggregates and Their Ability to Propagate as a Prion Can Be Dissociated
In a previous study, we showed that the formation of large aggregates of Ure2p correlates with [URE3] elimination (Ripaud et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). We confirm that in these experimental conditions, when only the large and very large aggregates were observed, the majority of cells lost the [URE3] prion. Indeed, when the overexpression of Ure2pSc-GFP in [URE3] cells was stopped after 24 h of induction, only 5 × 10−4 cells still maintained the USA+ phenotype on glucose medium (data not shown). This strong and fast prion elimination led us to propose that curing of [URE3] occurred by inactivation of propagons through the massive aggregation of Ure2p (Ripaud et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). This inactivation could result from the formation of structurally distinct off-pathway nonprion Ure2p aggregates due to overexpression. Alternatively, inactivation could simply be because of the sequestration of the propagons in the mother cell through their assembly into bigger aggregates. In the latter hypothesis, the Ure2p large aggregates should be structurally related to the bona fide prion aggregates and should therefore conserve their ability to induce [URE3] apparition once introduced in [ure3-0] yeast cells. To test this hypothesis, we transformed [ure3–0] yeast cells with a crude extract of a strain containing large Ure2pSc-GFP aggregates together with a plasmid bearing the LEU2 marker. Then, Leu+ transformants were tested for the presence of [URE3] by their capacity to grow in the presence of USA. The prion phenotype was further confirmed by the phenotypic reversibility of the growth on USA medium after having treated the cells with 3 mM GuHCl. Approximately 22% of the Leu+ transformants were [URE3]. The results clearly indicate that the cells with Ure2pSc-GFP large aggregates contain Ure2p aggregates that are still infectious (Figure 7A) and that are thus structurally related with the propagating prion aggregates.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Functional characterization of Ure2p-GFP large aggregates. (A) Infectivity of sonicated yeast crude extract from URE2Sc [URE3] + pG2URE2Sc-GFP containing large aggregates was performed as described in Materials and Methods. A control transformation was (more ...)
The above-mentioned finding prompted us to investigate whether the cells with large aggregates of Ure2p are able to generate new transmissible aggregates. To that purpose, the progeny of cells with the large Ure2p-GFP aggregates were analyzed for their fluorescent aggregates content. After one generation, the proportion of cells with large aggregate clearly decreased, suggesting that large aggregates are nontransmissible (Supplemental Table S1). In accordance with the observed fast prion elimination, in microcolonies, daughter cells of mothers containing large aggregates Ure2p-GFP consistently contained no aggregates (Figure 7B). In a control experiment, the daughter cells of mothers propagating [URE3] prion exhibited the same aggregation pattern (small aggregates, visualized by the expression of a low level of Ure2pSc-GFP from the pH327 plasmid) (Supplemental Figure S3).
Together, these results suggest that the infectivity of Ure2p aggregates and their ability to propagate as a prion can be dissociated.
In this study, we showed that Ure2p of S. paradoxus possesses the capacity to switch into a [URE3] prion conformation. Our analyses demonstrated that the expression level of Ure2pSp strongly modulates this capacity. The ability to induce the prion form and/or to propagate this self-inactivation is observed only when Ure2pSp was not expressed at high level. In contrast, Ure2pSc and Ure2p of S. uvarum orthologue exhibited these prion properties regardless of the amount of Ure2p that is expressed (Baudin-Baillieu et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle).
Ure2pSp prion propagation is possible in S. cerevisiae (Edskes and Wickner, 2002 blue right-pointing triangle; this study). In a previous study, however, we failed to isolated [URE3] clones when Ure2pSp was expressed in its genuine cellular context, namely, in S. paradoxus (Talarek et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle). Expression level of Ure2pSp in S. paradoxus was similar to the ones allowing prion propagation in S. cerevisiae. Why [URE3] propagation from Ure2pSp could not be detected in S. paradoxus is unclear at present. It might be that Ure2pSp prion propagation cannot occur in that host or else that prion formation occurs at a very low frequency.
The native yeast prion proteins change from the functional form to the prion form more frequently if the parent genes are overexpressed. As a rule, it is widely accepted that “the more you express, the more prion you get.” The observed frequency of prion formation after a transitory overexpression of Ure2pSc or Ure2pSp from a monocopy plasmid is 100-fold higher than the rate of spontaneous acquisition of the prion at normal expression level. When the transient overexpression is performed from a multicopy plasmid, the cellular level of Ure2p is increased ~10-fold compared with Ure2p level produced from a monocopy plasmid. If the induction of [URE3] apparition was strictly proportional to the amount of Ure2p, the prion formation should also increase in the same extent. Surprisingly, strong overexpression of Ure2pSc led to the same induction rate as mild overexpression. The effect was even more dramatic with Ure2pSp because increasing its protein concentration (from mild to strong overexpression) decreases (rather than increased) the frequency with which [URE3] arises. So, increasing the pool of Ure2p does not continually augment the occurrence of the event that initiates prion formation.
Yeast prion determinants are related to amyloid polymerization. In vitro, purified Ure2p spontaneously forms amyloid fibers, and the introduction of such fibers into [ure3-0] yeast cells leads to the [URE3] prion phenotype (Brachmann et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle; Immel et al., 2007 blue right-pointing triangle). But not all amyloid-forming proteins are prions. Tanaka et al. (2006) blue right-pointing triangle developed an elegant model, experimentally validated, that accounts for the difference between a noninfectious and a prion (infectious) amyloid. They proposed that the infectious nature of an amyloid is defined by two fundamental parameters: the rate of polymer elongation and its susceptibility to shearing. An amyloid aggregate can be propagated as a prion in a population of dividing cells only if, in combination, these parameters surpass a threshold to allow sustained propagation. Possible explanations for the impairment of prion properties when Ure2p is strongly overexpressed could therefore be related to a change either in the rate of amyloid growth or in the brittleness of the aggregates. The fragmentation frequency of an amyloid fiber is defined by the intrinsic physical properties of this particular amyloid conformation. It is unlikely that an increased level of Ure2p results in a change of conformational structure of its amyloid fibers. Conversely, in vitro, the speed of Ure2p fiber growth is linearly proportional to the concentration of soluble Ure2p (Fay et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). Similarly, our in vivo analysis highlighted that the aggregation dynamics of Ure2p is faster when cellular concentration of Ure2p increases. We showed that the Ure2p aggregates isolated from cells which no longer propagate [URE3] still retain their ability to induce [URE3] once artificially introduced in wild-type [ure3-0] cells. This result suggests that the large aggregates are structurally related to the amyloid [URE3] prion aggregates and do not correspond to a distinct off-pathway aggregate. The high levels of Ure2p increase the speed of polymerization of fibers. Consequently, it is possible that above a threshold Ure2p amount, the formed aggregates are not self-propagating because their size increase and coalescence is too rapid. In this model, rapidly growing and coalescing Ure2p aggregates would fail to be segregated properly to daughter cells during cell divisions, as shown by our microscopy observations (Figure 7B). In agreement with this model, is the fact that increasing the cellular concentration of Ure2p results in a reduction of [URE3] propagon number (Figure 6).
Here, we showed that the aggregation pathway of the two Ure2p orthologues share the same intermediates states. However, a major difference lies in the aggregation dynamics that is faster for Ure2pSp than for Ure2pSc. Consequently, we observed many more cells containing very large aggregates when Ure2pSp is overexpressed. Similarly, our in vitro analyses showed that Ure2pSp exhibits a higher propensity to aggregate than Ure2pSc (Immel et al., 2007 blue right-pointing triangle). We have also demonstrated that Ure2pSp is able to assemble in an infectious amyloid and that this one was significantly more resistant than the Ure2pSc amyloid to mechanical shearing (Immel et al., 2007 blue right-pointing triangle). Interestingly, our propagon counting assay indicated that the apparent number of propagons per cell in the [URE3] URE2Sp strain was much smaller than that found in [URE3] URE2Sc (Figure 7). Therefore, we can speculate that Ure2pSp would tend to form aggregates, which could resist more efficiently to fragmentation and would be unable to be transmitted to daughter cells. The most likely possibility to explain this higher stability could be the longer asparagine stretch present in the prion-forming domain (Supplemental Figure S1). Indeed, the prion aggregation properties of the described yeast proteins rely on their content in glutamine and asparagine (Osherovich et al., 2004 blue right-pointing triangle). These stretches could stabilize the polymer by specific polar zipper structures and asparagine-ladders (Perutz et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle; Nelson et al., 2005 blue right-pointing triangle). Thus, independently of its rate of polymerization, the Ure2pSp prion aggregates would be less prone to fragmentation than prion aggregates of Ure2pSc.
In Figure 8, we have summarized all these observations and integrated then in the analytical model proposed by Tanaka et al. (2006) blue right-pointing triangle. Our results suggest that there would be another threshold above which stable prion propagation would not be possible. In this area on the diagram (top left area), the prion particles would be too large and/or to few to allow efficient propagation at cell division. Thus, although in the Tanaka model increasing fiber growth rate favors prion stability, it might be that above a given value, the polymerization rate can become detrimental to prion maintenance.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
A diagram of the parameters determining the ability of an amyloid to be prion. In this diagram adapted from Figure 1B in Tanaka et al. (2006) blue right-pointing triangle, we suggest, without direct experimental evidence, relative positions for the [URE3] prion propagated by Ure2p (more ...)
Together, our results suggest that the concentration of a prion protein modifies a fundamental parameter (the amyloid polymerization rate), which contributes to determine its transmission ability. It is possible that variation in prion protein expression could also interfere with prion propagation in mammals. Prion accumulation occurs in specific neuronal target areas. The reasons that define this cellular tropism are still largely unknown. Interestingly, it was reported that the level of prion protein differs markedly between different neuronal types (Ford et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). It would be interesting to study whether the concentration of cellular PrP could contribute to the determination of the variable cellular tropism of prion accumulation.
Supplementary Material
[Supplemental Materials]
We thank B. Daignan-Fornier (IBGC Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Bordeaux, France) for the antibodies against Ade13p, O. Ozier-Kalogeropoulos (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) for the pFL39URE2Sc plasmid, and R. Wickner (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) for the pH327 plasmid. We thank F. Immel for the construction of pFL39URE2Sp plasmid and of the AF30 strain, K. Rebora for looking over the English, and S. Saupe (IBGC Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) for helpful and stimulating discussions, especially with L. M. This work was supported by a grant from the French Research National Agency Agence National de la Recherche grant, project ANR-06-MRAR-011-01 “AMYLOID.”
This article was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press ( on February 18, 2009.
  • Aguzzi A., Heikenwalder M., Polymenidou M. Insights into prion strains and neurotoxicity. Nature reviews. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:552–561. [PubMed]
  • Aigle M., Lacroute F. Genetical aspects of [URE3], a non-mitochondrial, cytoplasmically inherited mutation in yeast. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1975;136:327–335. [PubMed]
  • Allen K. D., Wegrzyn R. D., Chernova T. A., Müller S., Newnam G. P., Winslett P. A., Wittich K. B., Wilkinson K. D., Chernoff Y. O. Hsp70 chaperones as modulators of prion life cycle: novel effects of Ssa and Ssb on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion [PSI+] Genetics. 2005;169:1227–1242. [PubMed]
  • Bach S., Talarek N., Andrieu T., Vierfond J., Mettey Y., Galons H., Dormont D., Meijer L., Cullin C., Blondel M. Isolation of drugs active against mammalian prions using a yeast-based screening assay. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003;21:1075–1081. [PubMed]
  • Bagriantsev S. N., Gracheva E. O., Richmond J. E., Liebman S. W. Variant-specific [PSI+] infection is transmitted by Sup35 polymers within [PSI+] aggregates with heterogeneous protein composition. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:2433–2443. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Baskakov I. V. The reconstitution of mammalian prion infectivity de novo. FEBS J. 2007;274:576–587. [PubMed]
  • Baudin-Baillieu A., Fernandez-Bellot E., Reine F., Coissac E., Cullin C. Conservation of the prion properties of Ure2p through evolution. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2003;14:3449–3458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Beck T., Hall M. N. The TOR signalling pathway controls nuclear localization of nutrient-regulated transcription factors. Nature. 1999;402:689–692. [PubMed]
  • Brachmann A., Baxa U., Wickner R. B. Prion generation in vitro: amyloid of Ure2p is infectious. EMBO J. 2005;24:3082–3092. [PubMed]
  • Bradley M. E., Liebman S. W. The Sup35 domains required for maintenance of weak, strong or undifferentiated yeast [PSI+] prions. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;51:1649–1659. [PubMed]
  • Chernoff Y. O., Lindquist S. L., Ono B., Inge-Vechtomov S. G., Liebman S. W. Role of the chaperone protein Hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [psi+] Science. 1995;268:880–884. [PubMed]
  • Collinge J., Clarke A. R. A general model of prion strains and their pathogenicity. Science. 2007;318:930–936. [PubMed]
  • Cox B., Ness F., Tuite M. Analysis of the generation and segregation of propagons: entities that propagate the [PSI+] prion in yeast. Genetics. 2003;165:23–33. [PubMed]
  • Cox K. H., Rai R., Distler M., Daugherty J. R., Coffman J. A., Cooper T. G. Saccharomyces cerevisiae GATA sequences function as TATA elements during nitrogen catabolite repression and when Gln3p is excluded from the nucleus by overproduction of Ure2p. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:17611–17618. [PubMed]
  • Cullin C., Minvielle-Sebastia L. Multipurpose vectors designed for the fast generation of N- or C-terminal epitope-tagged proteins. Yeast. 1994;10:105–112. [PubMed]
  • Derkatch I. L., Bradley M. E., Hong J. Y., Liebman S. W. Prions affect the appearance of other prions: the story of [PIN(+)] Cell. 2001;106:171–182. [PubMed]
  • Derkatch I. L., Bradley M. E., Masse S. V., Zadorsky S. P., Polozkov G. V., Inge-Vechtomov S. G., Liebman S. W. Dependence and independence of [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)]: a two-prion system in yeast? EMBO J. 2000;19:1942–1952. [PubMed]
  • Derkatch I. L., Chernoff Y. O., Kushnirov V. V., Inge-Vechtomov S. G., Liebman S. W. Genesis and variability of [PSI] prion factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1996;144:1375–1386. [PubMed]
  • Du Z., Park K. W., Yu H., Fan Q., Li L. Newly identified prion linked to the chromatin-remodeling factor Swi1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:460–465. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Eaglestone S. S., Ruddock L. W., Cox B. S., Tuite M. F. Guanidine hydrochloride blocks a critical step in the propagation of the prion-like determinant [PSI(+)] of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:240–244. [PubMed]
  • Edskes H. K., Wickner R. B. Conservation of a portion of the S. cerevisiae Ure2p prion domain that interacts with the full-length protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99(suppl 4):16384–16391. [PubMed]
  • Edskes H. K., Gray V. T., Wickner R. B. The [URE3] prion is an aggregated form of Ure2p that can be cured by overexpression of Ure2p fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:1498–1503. [PubMed]
  • Fay N., Inoue Y., Bousset L., Taguchi H., Melki R. Assembly of the yeast prion Ure2p into protein fibrils. Thermodynamic and kinetic characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:30199–30205. [PubMed]
  • Fernandez-Bellot E., Guillemet E., Cullin C. The yeast prion [URE3] can be greatly induced by a functional mutated URE2 allele. EMBO J. 2000;19:3215–3222. [PubMed]
  • Fernandez-Bellot E., Guillemet E., Ness F., Baudin-Baillieu A., Ripaud L., Tuite M., Cullin C. The [URE3] phenotype: evidence for a soluble prion in yeast. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:76–81. [PubMed]
  • Ferreira P. C., Ness F., Edwards S. R., Cox B. S., Tuite M. F. The elimination of the yeast [PSI+] prion by guanidine hydrochloride is the result of Hsp104 inactivation. Mol. Microbiol. 2001;40:1357–1369. [PubMed]
  • Ford M. J., Burton L. J., Li H., Graham C. H., Frobert Y., Grassi J., Hall S. M., Morris R. J. A marked disparity between the expression of prion protein and its message by neurones of the CNS. Neuroscience. 2002;111:533–551. [PubMed]
  • Immel F., Jiang Y., Wang Y. Q., Marchal C., Maillet L., Perrett S., Cullin C. In vitro analysis of SpUre2p, a prion-related protein, exemplifies the relationship between amyloid and prion. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:7912–7920. [PubMed]
  • King C. Y., Diaz-Avalos R. Protein-only transmission of three yeast prion strains. Nature. 2004;428:319–323. [PubMed]
  • Masison D., Wickner R. B. Prion-inducing domain of yeast ure2p and protease resistance of ure2p in prion-containing cells. Science. 1995;270:93–95. [PubMed]
  • Nelson R., Sawaya M. R., Balbirnie M., Madsen A. Ø., Riekel C., Grothe R., Eisenberg D. Structure of the cross-beta spine of amyloid-like fibrils. Nature. 2005;435:773–778. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Yeast recombination: the association between double-strand gap repair and crossing-over. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1983;80:4417–4421. [PubMed]
  • Osherovich L. Z., Cox B. S., Tuite M. F., Weissman J. S. Dissection and design of yeast prions. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:E86. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Patel B. K., Liebman S. W. “Prion-proof” for [PIN+]: infection with in vitro-made amyloid aggregates of Rnq1p-(132-405) induces [PIN+] J. Mol. Biol. 2007;365:773–782. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Patino M. M., Liu J. J., Glover J. R., Lindquist S. Support for the prion hypothesis for inheritance of a phenotypic trait in yeast. Science. 1996;273:622–626. [PubMed]
  • Paushkin S. V., Kushnirov V. V., Smirnov V. N., Ter-Avanesyan M. D. In vitro propagation of the prion-like state of yeast Sup35 protein. Science. 1997;277:381–383. [PubMed]
  • Perrett S., Jones G. W. Insights into the mechanism of prion propagation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008;18:52–59. [PubMed]
  • Perutz M. F., Pope B. J., Owen D., Wanker E. E., Scherzinger E. Aggregation of proteins with expanded glutamine and alanine repeats of the glutamine-rich and asparagine-rich domains of Sup35 and of the amyloid beta-peptide of amyloid plaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:5596–5600. [PubMed]
  • Prusiner S. B., Gajdusek C., Alpers M. P. Kuru with incubation periods exceeding two decades. Ann. Neurol. 1982;12:1–9. [PubMed]
  • Ripaud L., Maillet L., Cullin C. The mechanisms of [URE3] prion elimination demonstrate that large aggregates of Ure2p are dead-end products. EMBO J. 2003;22:5251–5259. [PubMed]
  • Ripaud L., Maillet L., Immel-Torterotot F., Durand F., Cullin C. The [URE3] yeast prion results from protein aggregates that differ from amyloid filaments formed in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:50962–50968. [PubMed]
  • Satpute-Krishnan P., Langseth S. X., Serio T. R. Hsp104-dependent remodeling of prion complexes mediates protein-only inheritance. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shewmaker F., Mull L., Nakayashiki T., Masison D. C., Wickner R. B. Ure2p function is enhanced by its prion domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2007;176:1557–1565. [PubMed]
  • Shorter J., Lindquist S. Destruction or potentiation of different prions catalyzed by similar Hsp104 remodeling activities. Mol. Cell. 2006;23:425–438. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Talarek N., Maillet L., Cullin C., Aigle M. The [URE3] prion is not conserved among Saccharomyces species. Genetics. 2005;171:23–34. [PubMed]
  • Tanaka M., Chien P., Naber N., Cooke R., Weissman J. S. Conformational variations in an infectious protein determine prion strain differences. Nature. 2004;428:323–328. [PubMed]
  • Tanaka M., Collins S. R., Toyama B. H., Weissman J. S. The physical basis of how prion conformations determine strain phenotypes. Nature. 2006;442:585–589. [PubMed]
  • Turoscy V., Cooper T. G. Ureidosuccinate is transported by the allantoate transport system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 1987;169:2598–2600. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wickner R. B. [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1994;264:566–569. [PubMed]
  • Wickner R. B., Edskes H. K., Shewmaker F. How to find a prion: [URE3], [PSI+] and β Methods. 2006;39:3–8. [PubMed]
  • Wickner R. B., Edskes H. K., Shewmaker F., Nakayashiki T. Prions of fungi: inherited structures and biological roles. Nature reviews. Microbiology. 2007;5:611–618. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhou P., Derkatch I. L., Liebman S. W. The relationship between visible intracellular aggregates that appear after overexpression of Sup35 and the yeast prion-like elements [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)] Mol. Microbiol. 2001;39:37–46. [PubMed]
Articles from Molecular Biology of the Cell are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Cell Biology