Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Mol Cell Cardiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2668609



KCNQ1 is co-assembled with KCNE1 subunits in the heart to form the cardiac delayed rectifier K+ current (IKs), which is one of the main currents responsible for myocyte repolarization. The most commonly inherited form of cardiac arrhythmias, long-QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1), is due to mutations on KCNQ1. Gq-coupled receptors (GqPCRs) are known to mediate positive inotropism in human ventricular myocardium. The mechanism of IKs current modulation by GqPCRs remains incompletely understood. Here we studied the molecular mechanisms underlying Gq regulation of the IKs channel. Heterologously expressed IKs (human KCNQ1/KCNE1 subunits) was measured in Xenopus oocytes, expressed together with GqPCRs. Our data from several GqPCRs shows that IKs is regulated in a biphasic manner, showing both an activation and an inhibition phase. Receptor-mediated inhibition phase was irreversible when recycling of agonist-sensitive pools of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) was blocked by the lipid kinase inhibitor wortmannin. In addition, stimulation of PIP2 production, by overexpression of phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate-5-kinase (PIP5-kinase), decreased receptor-mediated inhibition. The receptor-mediated activation phase was inhibited by the PKC inhibitor calphostin C and by a mutation in a putative PKC phosphorylation site in the KCNE1 subunit. Our results indicate that the depletion of membrane PIP2 underlies receptor-mediated inhibition of IKs and that phosphorylation by PKC of the KCNE1 subunit underlies the GqPCR-mediated channel activation.


Cardiac function is regulated by a diverse array of hormones and neurotransmitters, many of which exert their physiological effects through G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). There are three main GPCR families: Gs, Gi and Gq/G11. G-proteins of the Gq/G11 family, when activated, stimulate phosphatidylinositide-specific phospholipase C (PLC). The substrate for PLC is phosphotidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate (PIP2), so that agonist stimulation of the receptor causes reduction of PIP2 in the plasma membrane. Hydrolysis of PIP2 generates inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). Stimulation of IP3 receptors by IP3 releases Ca2+ from intracellular stores. In addition, DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC).

GqPCRs such as α1 adrenergic, angiotensin II AT1 and endothelin receptor are known to mediate positive inotropism in human ventricular myocardium [1]. Their stimulation contributes to the increase in contractility in early stages of heart failure. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors modulate GqPCR function, are widely used for treatment of cardiomyopathies, and have been shown to have antiarrhythmic properties. ACE inhibitors are thought to decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation [2] and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with decreased left ventricular function (for review see [3]).

The literature on GqPCR modulation of IKs is seemingly contradictory. GqPCRs have been reported to both inhibit and activate the native IKs current [47]. The mechanism underlying the GqPCR regulation of the channel is not known. IKs channels have been suggested to be regulated by downstream GqPCR signaling pathways. These include PKC phosphorylation [8,4,9,10], increases in intracellular Ca2+ [4,11] and more recently by PIP2 [12,13]. This is the first report to study the role of each of these pathways in GqPCR regulation of IKs.

We show that IKs is regulated by several GqPCRs in a biphasic manner. Our data shows that PKC phosphorylation underlies the activation phase. In addition, we show that PIP2 depletion, due to GqPCR stimulation, inhibits IKs. Our data suggest that changes in IKs regulation by GqPCRs may contribute to the pathophysiology of cardiac disease for long-QT syndrome and during heart failure where GqPCR signaling is up-regulated.


Molecular Biology

Site direct mutagenesis was performed using PFU ultra DNA polymerase (Stratagene). Construct sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing (Cornell, Ithaca). cRNAs were transcribed using the “message-machine” kit (Ambion) and RNA concentrations were estimated using RNA markers (Gibco). cRNA was injected at approximately concentrations: 2 ng for KCNQ1, 0.4 ng for KCNE1, 2 ng for IP3-phosphatase and 2 ng for M1, AT1 and BK2 receptors. Wild-type and mutant PI5-kinase RNA were injected into oocytes one day after receptor and channel subunits at a concentration of 0.7ng/oocyte. Detailed information about constructs is provided in the supplementary data.


IKs whole-oocyte currents were measured after 2s depolarization to +60mV from −80mV holding potential, unless otherwise indicated. Detailed methods are found in the supplementary data.

Currents were evaluated 5–10 min after oocytes impalement. Cl-free solutions were used to inhibit endogenous Ca2+-activated Cl currents for Cai2+-release experiments and contained (in mM): 82.5 Na-acetate, 2 K0H, 1 Mg-sulfate, 1.8 Ca-acetate, 5 NaOH/HEPES, pH 7.5. Ohmic leak currents calculated from the current measured at -80mV were subtracted for all time course currents presented.

Current regulation model

An schematic model of current regulation was produced by a sum of three components: two sigmoidal activation components of the form: PKCslow = 1−1/(1+(t/300)^3) and PKCfast: 1−1/(1+(t/20)^1.2); and a exponential inhibition of the form: InhPIP2 = 1−1*exp(t/150). Where t was the time after agonist application. Total current regulation was calculated as IReg=a*PKCslow + b*PKCfast + InhPIP2. The constants a and b were chosen to fit the data in figure 1B and figure 2B.

Figure 1
Biphasic modulation of IKs by Gq coupled receptor stimulation
Figure 2
Block of Cai2+-release changes modulation kinetics for GqPCRs receptors

Error bars represented standard-error of the mean. All experiments were performed independently at least 3 times. At least 3–6 oocytes from the same batch and at least 2–3 oocyte batches were used. Test conditions and control experiments were always done on oocytes from the same batch. Changes in current levels were measured after normalizing the current in each batch of oocytes by the average of the control current on the day of the experiment. Student t-test (two groups) or one-way ANOVA (more than two groups) were applied for the assessment of statistical significance. The investigation conforms with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85–23, revised 1996). Protocol approval was granted by a university ethics review board (UCAR-2004-275).


Agonist stimulation of Gq-coupled receptors shows biphasic regulation of IKs

In order to study IKs regulation by GqPCRs, we expressed the channel subunits with a number of representative Gq-coupled receptors. Human KCNQ1 and KCNE1 subunits were co-expressed in Xenopus oocytes with muscarinic type 1 (M1), angiotensin type 1 (AT1a) and bradykinin type 2 (BK2) receptors. Regulation of IKs by the GqPCR α-adrenergic receptor is particularly important because exercise in known to trigger syncope and sudden death in patients with mutations in the KCNQ1 and KCNE1 subunits [14]. Unfortunately, in our hands, α-adrenergic receptors did not express in oocytes. Nonetheless regulation by other GqPCR receptors, also potentially important in cardiac regulation, showed conserved features. Stimulation of the M1 and AT1 receptor by acetylcholine (ACh) and angiotensin II (ang II) respectively showed two phases of regulation: first, an increase of the current, followed by current decrease (Fig.1A). Stimulation of BK2 receptor by bradykinin (BK) showed mainly an inhibitory phase of regulation, suggesting that either activation is not present or it is concurrent with the inhibition phase. Current inhibition was significantly lower for M1 receptors when compared to both AT1 and BK2 receptors. Effects were measured in the activating current, the same results were observed in the tail current (data not shown). No significant change in the kinetics of agonist mediated activation or inhibition were observed among the receptors. For most cells current was stable after the inhibition phase even for long agonist applications (10–20min), for some cells a slow activation phase was observed at long agonist applications. Cl free external solutions were used to prevent the contribution of the endogenous Ca2+-dependent Cl- channel (see methods).

Intracellular Ca2+-release regulates agonist modulation of IKs

Intracellular Ca2+ has been shown to activate IKs [4,11,15,16], although the role of the rise in calcium upon GqPCR stimulation has not be studied. To study the contribution of Ca2+ to the biphasic regulation observed, we compared the regulation in the presence and in the absence of intracellular Ca2+-release. We co-expressed KCNQ1, KCNE1 and the receptor with IP3-phosphatase (IP3phosp) to inhibit intracellular Ca2+-release. Experiments were also performed with oocyte injection of 50nl of a 50mM EGTA solution to inhibit intracellular Ca2+-release with equivalent results (data not shown).

The endogenous Ca2+-dependent Cl currents present in oocytes was used to monitor intracellular Ca2+-release and the efficiency of the IP3phosp expression. Stimulation of all three receptors without IP3phosp expression produced robust and equivalent activation of the Ca2+-dependent Cl currents (data not shown) suggesting equivalent Ca2+-release upon receptor activation. Oocytes expressing IP3phosp showed no Ca2+-dependent Cl currents implying no intracellular Ca2+-release. The expression of IP3phosp did not affect the IKs current (IIP3/I = 1.0±0.1, n=9, p=0.83)

In the absence of intracellular Ca2+-release, the kinetics of IKs modulation upon receptor activation changed. The current was first inhibited and then activated for all three receptors (Fig. 2A). The extent and the kinetics of channel activation were not receptor-dependent but the kinetics of channel inhibition were receptor dependent: the time to inhibit 30% of the initial current (T30) was significantly faster for the BK receptor (53±10s, n=6), than for the AT1 receptor (80±10s, n=12) and the ACh receptor (107±12s, n=10). In addition, inhibition by ACh in the absence of Ca2+ was smaller than the Ang II- and BK- induced inhibition.

PKC phosphorylation underlies agonist-induced activation of IKs

PMA, a PKC activator, has been shown to activate human IKs [8,4,9,10]. The role of PKC activation on the GqPCR regulation of IKs is largely unknown. To test whether PKC activation upon receptor stimulation underlies the activation phase of the channel regulation we expressed the channel with either M1 or AT1A receptors. The current activation in the presence and absence of Ca2+ could be blocked by calphostin-C, a PKC inhibitor (Fig. 3A and B). Treatment with calphostin-C did not change the basal IKs current either in the presence or absence of IP3phosp (with IP3 phosp: Itreated/Iuntreated = 0.9±0.1, p=0.25, n=19 or without Itreated/Iuntreated = 1.1±0.1, p=0.35, n=18). Calphostin treated and control experiments were done on oocytes from the same batches.

Figure 3
Current stimulation phase is mediated by PKC

We co-expressed with KCNQ1 the mutant KCNE1(S102A), where a conserved PKC site has been suggested to underlie the PMA inhibition of the channel seen in mice and rats [4]. The increase in activity observed upon stimulation of the receptor was significantly reduced both in the presence and in the absence of intracellular Ca2+-release (Fig. 3C/D). Expression of KCNE1(S102A) did not affect unstimulated IKs current (IQ1+S102A/IWT = 1.1±0.1, p=0.47, n=24). Our results suggest the phosphorylation of the KCNE1(S102) residue is responsible for most of the current increase observed. Our results suggest that PKC phosphorylation underlies current activation both in the presence and in the absence of intracellular Ca2+-release.

Agonist stimulation of M1 receptor shifts voltage-dependence of IKs

In order to study in more detail the biophysical effects of agonist stimulation, we measured changes in the voltage dependence of activation and maximal conductance upon agonist stimulation. To determine the voltage dependence of IKs, we constructed isochronal (t=4s) activation curves, because IKs does not reach a steady level even after long depolarizations at room temperature. A longer depolarizing pulse could not be used because of the relative fast kinetics of the changes observed. Experiments using longer depolarizing pulses (18s and 2.7s) showed that length of the depolarizing pulse affects the voltage dependence of IKs, but relative shifts in the voltage dependence persist, independent of the length of the pulse [17]. We measured the IKs tail current at −40 mV after depolarization to a series of voltage steps from −40 to +80 mV (Fig. 4A). A Boltzmann fit of this data was used to determine the maximal conductance (Gmax) and V1/2 of activation. IKs regulation upon agonist stimulation was due to both to a modulation in the voltage dependence of activation and maximum conductance (Fig. 4B/C and D). As a control we measured time dependent changes of isochronal curves for IKs without agonist stimulation. After initial current stabilization, currents were stable during experiments where no ACh was added (Fig. 4C/D). IP3phosp was expressed to inhibit Cai2+-release. Note the changes observed are consistent with the ones shown in Figure 2 when ACh was applied. Similar results were found for cells in the presence of Cai2+-release (data not shown). We compared changes in isochronal activation curves for wild-type and KCNQ1/KCNE1(S102A) mutant channel. Consistent with our hypothesis that PKC regulates the activation phase and that phosphorylation of the S102 residue is involved in the regulation, the negative shift in the voltage dependence of activation was decreased by this mutation (Fig. 4E). There was no shift in unstimulated V1/2 caused by the mutation (V1/2(WT): 15±2 mV, n=17; V1/2(Q1/S102A): 14±2mV, n=18; p=0.57).

Figure 4
Biphasic modulation of voltage-dependence of IKs by ACh

PIP2 is produced in the plasma membrane by sequential phosphorylation of PI by PI4-kinase and phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate-5-kinase (PIP5-kinase). Regulation of either enzyme expression or activity will affect membrane PIP2 levels and PIP2 production. We tested whether the PI4-kinase inhibitor wortmannin (WMN) could shift the voltage-dependence of activation for the channel. At low concentrations WMN inhibits PI3-kinase (nM) and at higher (μM) it inhibits PI4-kinase and consequently the replenishment of PIP2 in the membrane [18]. Inhibition of PIP2 replenishment by treatment with WMN has been shown to decrease PIP2 membrane levels [12]. We measured isochronal activation curves for cells treated with WMN at increasing concentration. Consistent with PIP2 depletion underlying the inhibitory phase, WMN treatment shifted the voltage dependence of activation to more positive values in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 4E). Leftward shifts upon addition of exogenous PIP2 to the membrane have also been shown to occur, consistent with our results [19].

PIP2 hydrolysis underlies agonist-induced inhibition of IKs

PIP2 directly activated recombinant IKs currents when applied to inside-out patches and poly-Lys, a PIP2 scavenger, inhibits IKs currents [12], nonetheless, the role of PIP2 in GqPCR regulation of the channel has not been studied. To test whether depletion of PIP2 from the channel underlied the IKs inhibition observed upon GqPCR receptor stimulation, we used BK2 regulation of the channel because the smaller activation phase observed upon BK2 stimulation in the presence of intracellular Ca2+-release (Fig. 1A).

WMN has been shown to inhibit current and recovery from Gq-coupled receptor inhibition for a number of PIP2 sensitive channels [20,21,12,22,23]. We constructed a WMN dose-response of IKs inhibition using 1 hour treatment with the drug. No inhibitory effect was observed at low WMN concentrations (up to 100nM, a concentration that completely inhibits PI3-kinases). Progressive inhibition was observed, however, at higher concentrations (Fig. 5A, IC50=4.2±0.8μM), suggesting that PI4-kinase function and the depletion of membrane PIP2 is responsible for the WMN inhibition. WMN effect was abolished in cells expressing PI5-kinase. WMN does not inhibit the channel when PI5-kinase was co-expressed, and membrane PIP2 levels increased, suggesting both specificity of the effect and that WMN does not directly inhibit the IKs channel (5 μM WMN 45min treatment, 43±2% inhibition for control and 0.5±0.7% for PI5kinase expressing cells). PI5 kinase expressing cells have both an increase in PIP2 levels and stronger drive to make PIP2 from PI4P. The effect of WMN applications in these cells is expected to be weaker because a stronger inhibition of PI4-kinase is necessary in order to deplete membrane PIP2 levels to levels that inhibit IKs. These results suggest that the IKs current is sensitive to changes in membrane PIP2 levels.

Figure 5
PIP2 depletion mediates the agonist-induced current inhibition phase

To test whether PIP2 depletion underlied BK induced inhibition, we treated cells with WMN and measured agonist inhibition and recovery from inhibition. Inhibition was significantly increased after WMN treatment (Fig. 5B). An increase in PIP2-dependent inhibition is expected because less PIP2 is available to activate the channel and agonist mediated PIP2 hydrolysis is expected to cause a larger fractional decrease in the current. A PIP2 independent mechanism of inhibition would be expected to have the same fractional decrease and a smaller magnitude of decrease in current. In addition, recovery from inhibition after a short BK application (60s) was significantly inhibited after WMN treatment (Fig. 5C).

We also co-expressed the channel with PIP5-kinase, which has been shown to specifically increase membrane PIP2 levels in cells [2427]. Overexpression of PI5-kinase in atrial myocytes or in sympathetic neurons tonically increases membrane PIP2 levels and dramatically reduces desensitization of Kir3 channels and muscarinic modulation of endogenous M current [24,28]. Co-expression of the kinase decreased current inhibition upon agonist stimulation (Fig. 5D). PI5 kinase expression increased basal current. Currents were larger when PI5-kinase was expressed (72±10% increase relative to control, n=11) suggesting the channels not to be tonically saturated by PIP2.

In addition, we co-expressed a truncated form of the PIP5-kinase that lacks residues 1 to 238 and is catalytically inactive [29,27]. The truncated PIP5-kinase had no significant effect on BK-induced IKs inhibition. A similar result was observed for the IKs inhibition upon ACh stimulation of the M1 receptor. This data is complementary to the BK inhibition data in the presence of WMN, and indicates that the inhibition of the channel is due to PIP2 depletion. A decrease in PIP2-dependent inhibition is expected because more PIP2 is available to activate the channel and agonist mediated PIP2 hydrolysis is expected to cause a smaller fractional decrease in the current. A PIP2 independent mechanism of inhibition would be expected to have the same fractional decrease and a larger magnitude of decrease in current. In order to test whether the PIP2 depletion also underlied the ACh mediated inhibition we co-expressed PI5kinase and M1 receptors. The ACh-inhibition observed when cells were over-expressing PI5-kinase (8±2%, n=15) was lower than for control (40±3%, n=16).


Here we show that Gq-coupled receptors regulate IKs in a biphasic manner. Although downstream signaling molecules from GqPCR activation have been suggested to activate the channel [9,10,16,15,30], their physiological role in GqPCR stimulation has not been established. We studied the role of intracellular Ca2+-release, PKC phosphorylation and PIP2 depletion for Gq-coupled receptor regulation of IKs. We show that the activation phase is mediated by PKC phosphorylation and that PIP2 depletion underlies channel inhibition. This is the first time that evidence for a molecular mechanism is presented to explain Gq-coupled receptor inhibition of IKs. The work we present here is the first to study regulation by Gq-coupled receptors on channels formed by KCNQ1 and KCNE1 subunits in intact cells and suggests that this is an important pathway of heart rhythm regulation.

The kinetics of channel regulation observed in figure 1 and figure 2 for the stimulation of the three receptors is complex. Using a simple model we can simulate the basic kinetic parameters and magnitude of activation and inhibition of the channel with 3 components: one inhibitory component and two activation components (Fig. 6A). The inhibitory component corresponds to PIP2 depletion, modeled by an exponential inhibition. The activation components correspond to a fast and a slow/delayed activation, modeled by sigmoidal functions. Our data suggest that most of the activation phase is mediated by PKC, but they do not preclude a small contribution from other signaling pathways.

Figure 6
Schematic model of IKs current regulation by M1, AT1 and BK2 receptors

The change in kinetics of activation observed when comparing figure 1 and figure 2 requires the faster activation component to be more prominent in the presence of intracellular Ca2+ release (Fig. 6B). Changes in the inhibitory component are not necessary to fit the data, but are not precluded. Nonetheless, activation of endogenous Ca2+-dependent Cl currents were the same for the receptors tested (data not shown), suggesting equivalent Ca2+-release upon receptor activation and hydrolysis of PIP2. For simplicity, the model assumes a full inhibition by PIP2. A strong inhibition by PIP2 is necessary to explain the average inhibition observed in the concomitant presence of an activating signal. A complete inhibition is likely not achieved because of activation of lipid kinases in response to PIP2 depletion.

The lack of activation observed with BK stimulation can be explained by a smaller contribution of the fast activation component for this receptor (Fig. 6A right panel). A decrease in the fast activation component also explains the faster kinetics observed for BK inhibition when compared to ACh and angII in the absence of intracellular Ca2+-release (Fig. 6B). The model also explains the slower kinetics of inhibition observed for BK stimulation in the presence of Ca2+ when compared to the absence of Ca2+ (Fig 6 A and B right panels). Our data does not preclude that the fast-activation component is transient, but that is not necessary to explain the overall data.

We hypothesize that a faster channel response to Ca2+-dependent PKCs occurs in the presence of intracellular Ca2+ release. In the absence of intracellular Ca2+-release, a slower response to Ca2+-independent PKCs is more prominent. Our data is consistent with the translocation of the Ca2+-dependent isoforms of PKC being impaired with bradykinin stimulation. Indeed, bradykinin has been shown to activate PKC δ and PKCε but not PKCα in neonatal ventricular cardiomyocytes [31], while angiotensin has been shown to mediate redistribution of PKCε and the Ca2+ dependent PKC α and βII in guinea pig heart [32].

PKC is a serine/threonine kinase that has been implicated in many pathological conditions, such as cardiac hypertrophy, arrhythmias, heart failure and ischemic preconditioning [3337]. Knowledge of the arrhythmogenesis mechanism of PKC is very limited. Use of specific PKC blockers have been suggested as novel treatments for heart failure [36,37]. Channels formed with rat, mouse or human KCNE1 protein together with the endogeneous KCNQ subunit in oocytes have been shown to be inhibited by PMA [4, 38], a PKC activator. Phosphorylation of the KCNE1 S102 residue, also present in human KCNE1 has been implicated in this effect. More recent experiments on channels formed by human KCNQ1 and KCNE1 subunits showed current activation by PMA. The effect was blocked by the PKC inhibitor calphostin-C [10]. In addition, angiotensin II was suggested to potentiate atrial IKs through activation of PKC [39]. Phosphorylation of the KCNQ1 subunit has also been suggest to be involved in PMA regulation of the IKs channel [40]. Our data does not preclude the phosphorylation of the KCNQ1 subunit, but it suggests that KCNE1(S102) phosphorylation accounts for about half of the PKC-mediated activation observed upon Gq agonist stimulation for the human channel.

Intracellular Ca2+-release controls cardiac contraction. Abnormal release of Ca2+ from sarcoplasmic reticulum contributes to contractile dysfunction and arrhythmogenesis in heart failure. In heart failure the sarcoplasmic reticulum has reduced Ca2+ content so that the amount of Ca2+ released is smaller than under normal conditions [4143]. Channels formed by co-expression of the KCNQ1 and KCNE1 subunits have been reported to be activated by increases in intracellular calcium with use of the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin [11]. Work done with KCNE1 and endogenous oocyte KCNQ subunits showed that this channel is inhibited by decreases and enhanced by increases in intracellular Ca2+. Phosphorylation of the KCNE1 subunit by calmodulin-dependent kinases were implicated in this effect [4,44] (for review see [45]). However the phosphorylated residue (S40) is not present in the human KCNE1. Recently two papers suggested that basal intracellular Ca2+ affects both gating and assembly of IKs channels [16,15]. Our work does not contradict these data, here we studied whether increases of Ca2+ above resting level regulate channel gating and does not preclude regulation of channel gating by basal Ca2+. Nonetheless, our data suggests that the activation phase is mediated by PKC and main effect of IP3-dependent Ca+2-release upon GqPCR stimulation is not direct. We suggest that intracellular Ca2+-release regulates PKC-mediated activation, possibly through a Ca2+-dependent PKC isoform. A minor effect of Ca2+-Calmodulin in the early activation phase was not precluded.

The role of PIP2 as a second messenger molecule has become increasingly important through its modulation of a growing number of ion channels and transporters (for review see [46]). For Kir channels, several stimuli exert their effects through modifying interactions of the channel with PIP2 [4749]. Mutations of the inward rectifiers Kir2.1 and Kir1.1 have been shown to cause disruptions in the channel-PIP2 interactions leading to both Andersen’s and Bartter’s syndromes [50]. The activity of the channels formed by KCNQ1 and KCNE1 subunits, by KCNQ1 subunits alone, and by all other members of the KCNQ family have been shown to be critically dependent on PIP2 [19,21,12]. KCNQ channels were shown to be activated by PIP2 and channel run down was linked to PIP2 hydrolysis [12]. In addition, for channels formed by the KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 subunits, agonist-induced depletion of PIP2 has been associated with channel inhibition [12]. PIP2-dependent rundown/exogenous PIP2 application was shown to shift the voltage dependence of IKs activation [19]. Our work indicates that PIP2 depletion, upon Gq-coupled receptor activation, inhibits channel activity.

Understanding the signaling pathways underlying IKs regulation provides insight into the molecular basis of electrical signaling in the normal heart and the pathophysiology of heart failure and long-QT syndrome. Our results suggest that IKs regulation by GqPCRs may prove to be one of the causes of cardiac arrhythmias both in heart failure, where Gq-coupled receptors are particularly important in regulating inotropy and Long-QT syndrome. Understanding IKs regulation may allow us to devise innovative strategies to treat cardiac arrhythmias.

Supplementary Material


We would like to give our thanks to Echelle Sauer and Jeffrey Le for technical assistance. The work was supported by AHA Scientist Development Grant 0430052N.


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Reference List

1. Port JD, Bristow MR. Altered beta-adrenergic receptor gene regulation and signaling in chronic heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001;33:887–905. [PubMed]
2. Kalus JS, Coleman CI, White CM. The impact of suppressing the renin-angiotensin system on atrial fibrillation. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46:21–28. [PubMed]
3. Garg S, Narula J, Marelli C, Cesario D. Role of angiotensin receptor blockers in the prevention and treatment of arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 3152006;97:921–925. [PubMed]
4. Honore E, Attali B, Romey G, Heurteaux C, Ricard P, Lesage F, et al. Cloning, expression, pharmacology and regulation of a delayed rectifier K+ channel in mouse heart. EMBO J. 1991;10:2805–2811. [PubMed]
5. Matsumoto Y, Ogura T, Uemura H, Saito T, Masuda Y, Nakaya H. Histamine H1-receptor-mediated modulation of the delayed rectifier K+ current in guinea-pig atrial cells: opposite effects on IKs and IKr. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;128:1545–1553. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Daleau P, Turgeon J. Angiotensin II modulates the delayed rectifier potassium current of guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Pflugers Arch. 1994;427:553–555. [PubMed]
7. Selyanko AA, Hadley JK, Wood IC, Abogadie FC, Jentsch TJ, Brown DA. Inhibition of KCNQ1–4 potassium channels expressed in mammalian cells via M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J Physiol. 212000;522(Pt 3):349–355. [PubMed]
8. Walsh KB, Kass RS. Regulation of a heart potassium channel by protein kinase A and C. Science. 1988;242:67–69. [PubMed]
9. Lo CF, Numann R. Independent and exclusive modulation of cardiac delayed rectifying K+ current by protein kinase C and protein kinase A. Circ Res. 11161998;83:995–1002. [PubMed]
10. Xiao GQ, Mochly-Rosen D, Boutjdir M. PKC isozyme selective regulation of cloned human cardiac delayed slow rectifier K current. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;306:1019–1025. [PubMed]
11. Boucherot A, Schreiber R, Kunzelmann K. Regulation and properties of KCNQ1 (K(V)LQT1) and impact of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. J Membr Biol. 712001;182:39–47. [PubMed]
12. Zhang H, Craciun LC, Mirshahi T, Rohacs T, Lopes CMB, Jin T, et al. PIP2 activates KCNQ channels and its hydrolysis underlies receptor-mediated inhibition of M currents. Neuron. 2003;37:963–975. [PubMed]
13. Park KH, Piron J, Dahimene S, Merot J, Baro I, Escande D, et al. Impaired KCNQ1-KCNE1 and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate interaction underlies the long QT syndrome. Circ Res. 4152005;96:730–739. [PubMed]
14. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, Moss AJ, Vincent GM, Napolitano C, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias. Circ. 122001;103:89–95. [PubMed]
15. Ghosh S, Nunziato DA, Pitt GS. KCNQ1 assembly and function is blocked by long-QT syndrome mutations that disrupt interaction with calmodulin. Circ Res. 4282006;98:1048–1054. [PubMed]
16. Shamgar L, Ma LJ, Schmitt N, Haitin Y, Peretz A, Wiener R, et al. Calmodulin is essential for cardiac I-KS channel gating and assembly - Impaired function in long-QT mutations. Circ Res. 4282006;98:1055–1063. [PubMed]
17. Bianchi L, Priori SG, Napolitano C, Surewicz KA, Dennis AT, Memmi M, et al. Mechanisms of I-Ks suppression in LQT1 mutants. Am J Physiol Heart and Circ Physiol. 2000;279:H3003–H3011. [PubMed]
18. Nakanishi S, Catt KJ, Balla T. A wortmannin-sensitive phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase that regulates hormone-sensitive pools of inositolphospholipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:5317–5321. [PubMed]
19. Loussouarn G, Park KH, Bellocq C, Baro I, Charpentier F, Escande D. Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate, PIP2, controls KCNQ1/KCNE1 voltage-gated potassium channels: a functional homology between voltage-gated and inward rectifier K+ channels. EMBO J. 10152003;22:5412–5421. [PubMed]
20. Czirjak G, Petheo GL, Spat A, Enyedi P. Inhibition of TASK-1 potassium channel by phospholipase C. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;281:C700–C708. [PubMed]
21. Suh BC, Hille B. Recovery from muscarinic modulation of M current channels requires phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate synthesis. Neuron. 812002;35:507–520. [PubMed]
22. Lopes CMB, Rohacs T, Czirjak G, Balla T, Enyedi P, Logothetis DE. PIP2 hydrolysis underlies agonist-induced inhibition and regulates voltage gating of two-pore domain K+ channels. J Physiol. 412005;564:117–129. [PubMed]
23. Rohacs T, Lopes CMB, Michailidis I, Logothetis DE. PI(4,5)P-2 regulates the activation and desensitization of TRPM8 channels through the TRP domain. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:626–634. [PubMed]
24. Bender K, Wellner-Kienitz MC, Pott L. Transfection of a phosphatidyl-4-phosphate 5-kinase gene into rat atrial myocytes removes inhibition of GIRK current by endothelin and alpha-adrenergic agonists. Febs Letters. 1092002;529:356–360. [PubMed]
25. Li Y, Gamper N, Hilgemann DW, Shapiro MS. Regulation of Kv7 (KCNQ) K+ channel open probability by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J Neurosci. 10262005;25:9825–9835. [PubMed]
26. Zaika O, Lara LS, Gamper N, Hilgemann D, Jaffe DB, Shapiro MS. Angiotensin II regulates neuronal excitability via phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-dependent modulation of Kv7 (M-type) K+ channels. J Physiol-Lon. 8152006;575:49–67. [PubMed]
27. Shyng SL, Barbieri A, Gumusboga A, Cukras C, Pike L, Davis JN, et al. Modulation of nucleotide sensitivity of ATP-sensitive potassium channels by phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1182000;97:937–941. [PubMed]
28. Winks JS, Hughes S, Filippov AK, Tatulian L, Abogadie FC, Brown DA, et al. Relationship between membrane phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate and receptor-mediated inhibition of native neuronal M channels. J Neurosci. 3302005;25:3400–3413. [PubMed]
29. Davis JN, Rock CO, Cheng MG, Watson JB, Ashmun RA, Kirk H, Kay RJ, Roussel MF. Complementation of growth factor receptor-dependent mitogenic signaling by a truncated type I phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:7398–7406. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Ding WG, Toyoda F, Matsuura H. Regulation of cardiac I-Ks potassium current by membrane phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J Biol Chem. 1232004;279:50726–50734. [PubMed]
31. Clerk A, GillespieBrown J, Fuller SJ, Sugden PH. Stimulation of phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis, protein kinase C translocation, and mitogen-activated protein kinase activity by bradykinin in rat ventricular myocytes: Dissociation from the hypertrophic response. Biochem J. 711996;317:109–118. [PubMed]
32. Takeishi Y, Jalili T, Ball NA, Walsh RA. Responses of cardiac protein kinase C isoforms to distinct pathological stimuli are differentially regulated. Circ Res. 861999;85:264–271. [PubMed]
33. Bowling N, Walsh RA, Song GJ, Estridge T, Sandusky GE, Fouts RL, et al. Increased protein kinase C activity and expression of Ca2+-sensitive isoforms in the failing human heart. Circ. 1261999;99:384–391. [PubMed]
34. Miyamae M, Rodriguez MM, Camacho SA, Diamond I, Mochly-Rosen D, Figueredo VM. Activation of epsilon protein kinase C correlates with a cardioprotective effect of regular ethanol consumption. Proc Nat Ac Sci. 771998;95:8262–8267. [PubMed]
35. Qiu YM, Ping PP, Tang XL, Manchikalapudi S, Rizvi A, Zhang J, et al. Direct evidence that protein kinase C plays an essential role in the development of late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits and that epsilon is the isoform involved. J Clin Inv. 5151998;101:2182–2198. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Inagaki K, Begley R, Ikeno F, Mochly-Rosen D. Cardioprotection by epsilon-protein kinase C activation from ischemia - Continuous delivery and antiarrhythmic effect of an epsilon-protein kinase C-activating peptide. Circ. 142005;111:44–50. [PubMed]
37. Arimoto T, Takeishi Y, Takahashi H, Shishido T, Niizeki T, Koyama Y, et al. Cardiac-specific overexpression of diacylglycerol kinase xi prevents Gq protein-coupled receptor agonist-induced cardiac hypertrophy in transgenic mice. Circ. 132006;113:60–66. [PubMed]
38. Busch AE, Varnum MD, North RA, Adelman JP. An amino acid mutation in a potassium channel that prevents inhibition by protein kinase C. Science. 3271992;255:1705–1707. [PubMed]
39. Zankov DP, Omatsu-Kanbe M, Isono T, Toyoda F, Ding WG, Matsuura H, et al. Angiotensin II potentiates the slow component of delayed rectifier K+ current via the AT(1) receptor in guinea pig atrial myocytes. Circ. 3142006;113:1278–1286. [PubMed]
40. Kathofer S, Rockl K, Zhang W, Thomas D, Katus H, Kiehn J, et al. Human beta(3)-adrenoreceptors couple to KvLQT1/MinK potassium channels in Xenopus oocytes via protein kinase C phosphorylation of the KvLQT1 protein. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharm. 2003;368:119–126. [PubMed]
41. Gwathmey JK, Copelas L, MacKinnon R, Schoen FJ, Feldman MD, Grossman W, et al. Abnormal Intracellular Calcium Handling in Myocardium from Patients with End-Stage Heart-Failure. Circ Res. 1987;61:70–76. [PubMed]
42. Gwathmey JK, Slawsky MT, Hajjar RJ, Briggs GM, Morgan JP. Role of Intracellular Calcium Handling in Force Interval Relationships of Human Ventricular Myocardium. J Clin Inv. 1990;85:1599–1613. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Beuckelmann DJ, Erdmann E. Ca-2+-Currents and Intracellular [Ca-2+]I-Transients in Single Ventricular Myocytes Isolated from Terminally Failing Human Myocardium. Basic Res Cardiol. 1992;87:235–243. [PubMed]
44. Honore E, Attali B, Lesage F, Barhanin J, Lazdunski M. Receptor-mediated regulation of IsK, a very slowly activating, voltage-dependent K+ channel in Xenopus oocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;184:1135–1141. [PubMed]
45. Suessbrich H, Busch AE. The IKs channel: coassembly of IsK (minK) and KvLQT1 proteins. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;137:191–226. [PubMed]
46. Hilgemann DW, Feng S, Nasuhoglu C. The complex and intriguing lives of PIP2 with ion channels and transporters. Sci STKE 12-4-2001. 2001:RE19. [PubMed]
47. Zhang H, He C, Yan X, Mirshahi T, Logothetis DE. Activation of inwardly rectifying K+ channels by distinct PtdIns(4,5)P2 interactions. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:183–188. [PubMed]
48. Liou HH, Zhou SS, Huang C-L. Regulation of ROMK1 channel by protein kinase A via a phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-dependent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:5820–5825. [PubMed]
49. Du XO, Zhang HL, Lopes C, Mirshahi T, Rohacs T, Logothetis DE. Characteristic interactions with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate determine regulation of Kir channels by diverse modulators. J Biol Chem. 932004;279:37271–37281. [PubMed]
50. Lopes CMB, Zhang H, Rohacs T, Jin T, Logothetis DE. Alterations in Conserved Kir Channel-PIP2 Interactions Underlie Channelopathies. Neuron. 2002;34:933–944. [PubMed]