PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 May; 30(5): 491–493.
doi:  10.1086/597234
PMCID: PMC2666107
NIHMSID: NIHMS85415

Risk Factors for Fecal Colonization with Multiple Distinct Strains of Escherichia coli Among Long-Term Care Facility Residents

Ebbing Lautenbach, MD, MPH, MSCE,(1)(4) Pam Tolomeo, MPH, CCRP,(3) Nicole Black, CCRP,(3) and Joel N. Maslow, MD, PhD(1)(4)(5)

Abstract

Of 49 long-term care facility residents, 21 (43%) were colonized with two or more distinct strains of Escherichia coli. There were no significant risk factors for colonization with multiple strains of E. coli. These results suggest future efforts to efficiently identify diversity of colonizing strains will be challenging.

Keywords: Escherichia coli, colonies, fecal

INTRODUCTION

The important role of gastrointestinal (GI) tract colonization with bacterial pathogens has been increasingly recognized in efforts to elucidate the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance [1]. The use of surveillance cultures (usually employing a rectal swab approach) is common both as a component of epidemiologic studies as well as infection control initiatives [2]. It is recognized that an individual may be colonized with more than one distinct strain of Escherichia coli at any given time [3]. Many different approaches to colony sampling (i.e., the number of colonies from a plate that are evaluated) have been employed [3-7]. Improved ability to predict an individual’s likelihood of being colonized with multiple distinct E. coli strains (both antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant) would improve the efficiency of such colony sampling strategies. Despite this, risk factors for colonization with multiple strains of E. coli have not been studied. The goal of the current study was to identify risk factors for colonization with more than one strain of E. coli.

METHODS

This study was performed at the Philadelphia Veteran’s Administration Medical Center (PVAMC) long term care facility (LTCF). Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Pennsylvania and the PVAMC. This study is based on data originally collected as part of a study investigating the epidemiology of GI tract colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant and fluoroquinolone-susceptible E. coli in LTCF residents [8]. As described previously, LTCF residents were recruited for this study between March and July 2002. All residents were considered eligible for inclusion and were enrolled if informed consent could be obtained. For enrolled subjects, one rectal swab was obtained at enrollment.

Swabs were inoculated onto MacConkey agar without antimicrobial additives (nonselective medium). Up to 25 lactose-positive colonies (as available) were arbitrarily selected and inoculated onto nonselective media and MacConkey agar containing 8 μg/ml of ofloxacin. If fewer than 25 colonies were present, all were sampled. If greater than 25 colonies were present, 25 colonies were selected at random. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and species identification were confirmed by automated testing (Vitek, BioMerieux, Hazelwood, MO) [8].

Chromosomal DNA was digested with XbaI and resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using the CHEF DR II System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) to determine genetic relatedness [8]. Strain identity was interpreted according to established criteria [9].

To determine risk factors for colonization with multiple distinct strains of E. coli, we conducted a cross sectional study. Cases were defined as those subjects for whom two or more distinct strains of E. coli were identified while controls were defined as subjects harboring only one strain of E. coli. The computerized VA medical record was reviewed for potential risk factors. Data obtained included age, gender, race, the number of days from LTCF admission to study enrollment, and prior hospitalizations. Presence of a decubitus ulcer, surgical wound and indwelling devices (i.e., tracheostomy, urinary catheter, and feeding tube) were ascertained. Data on co-morbid conditions included renal insufficiency, malignancy, diabetes, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, dementia, and depression were also assessed. Finally, pharmacy records were reviewed for all antibiotic prescriptions for one year prior to study entry. Overall antibiotic exposure as well as exposure to specific agents and classes was assessed [10].

Bivariable analyses were performed to determine the association between each variable and the outcome of interest (i.e., colonization with multiple E. coli strains). Categorical variables were compared using Fishers exact test while continuous variables were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine both the strength of any association and the precision of the estimate of the effect. Multivariable analyses were considered to further evaluate those variables found to be significantly associated with the outcome on unadjusted analyses. All statistical calculations were performed using STATA version 10.0 (Stata Corp, College Station TX).

RESULTS

A total of 49 LTCF residents were included in the study. The median age of study subjects was 69 years (range, 38-98 years) and two (4.1%) subjects were female. Twenty-nine (59%) subjects were White, 18 (37%) were African-American, one (2%) was Hispanic, and one (2%) was unknown [3].

There were 21 subjects (43%) colonized with multiple strains of E. coli. Of these 21 subjects, 11 were colonized with two distinct strains, eight were colonized with three strains, and one subject each was colonized with four strains and five strains, respectively. The median number of colonies sampled per subject was 23 (interquartile range (IQR) = 17-25). The median number of colonies sampled for the 28 subjects with only one strain identified was 22 (IQR= 17-25) while the median number of colonies sampled for the 21 subjects with greater than one strain identified was 23 (IQR = 16-25) [3].

There were no significant differences when comparing the demographic variables and comorbidities of cases and controls (Table). Similarly, prior antibiotic exposure was not significantly different when comparing cases and controls. The primary assessment of antibiotic use included all use in the past year. We then conducted secondary analyses in which we assessed antibiotics in the prior three months, six months, and nine months. The results of these analyses were not substantively different from the primary analysis. As there were no significant risk factors identified on bivariable analyses, multivariable analyses were not conducted.

Table 1
Risk Factors for Colonization with Multiple Distinct E. coli Strains

DISCUSSION

Among 49 LTCF residents, we found nearly half were colonized with multiple strains of E. coli. GI tract colonization with multiple strains of E. coli has not previously been assessed in the LTCF population. As there is a greater focus on GI tract colonization with both antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant bacteria, infection control and research initiatives are increasingly focusing on elucidating the characteristics of colonization. Given limited resources, optimizing the ability to identify the breath of colonizing strains (e.g., to characterize potential person to person spread of strains), must be balanced against the need for efficiency. The resources required to evaluate numerous colonies per swab are substantial and often beyond the scope of research and infection control endeavors. Being able to identify particular patient populations who are more likely to be colonized with multiple strains of E. coli might enable these more intense microbiological evaluations to be more specifically targeted. (i.e., to those individuals at greatest risk of colonization with multiple strains). This work represents the first effort, to our knowledge, to identify risk factors for colonization with multiple distinct clones of E. coli. However, our findings reveal there are no clear characteristics that help to distinguish those individuals at greatest risk of colonization with multiple colonies. These results suggest that efforts to more efficiently identify diversity of colonizing strains will be challenging.

Our study had several potential limitations. Although we sampled up to 25 colonies per subject, it is likely that sampling an even larger number would provide some incremental increase in the ability to determine breadth of diversity. Whether results of our study, conducted in a VA LTCF, can be generalized to other institutions is unknown.

In summary, we found subjects are often colonized with more than one strain of E. coli. Furthermore, no clear characteristics help to distinguish those populations at greater risk of colonization with multiple colonies. Future studies should focus on how patient populations colonized with multiple E. coli strains may be most efficiently identified.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Public Health Service grant R01-AG023792 of the National Institute on Aging (NIH) (Dr. Lautenbach) and a pilot grant from the Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) (Dr. Maslow). This study was also supported in part by an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics cooperative agreement (U18-HS10399).

Dr. Lautenbach has received research support from Merck, Ortho-McNeil, Cubist and AstraZeneca. Dr. Maslow has received research support from Merck.

Footnotes

All other authors: no conflicts

REFERENCES

1. Donskey CJ. The role of the intestinal tract as a reservoir and source for transmission of nosocomial pathogens. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:219–26. [PubMed]
2. Lautenbach E, Harris AD, Perencevich EN, Nachamkin I, Tolomeo P, Metlay JP. Test characteristics of perirectal and rectal swab compared to stool sample for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the gastrointestinal tract. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:798–800. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Lautenbach E, Bilker WB, Tolomeo P, Maslow JN. Impact of diversity of colonizing strains on strategies for sampling Escherichia coli from fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3094–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Anderson MA, Whitlock JE, Harwood VJ. Diversity and distribution of Escherichia coli genotypes and antibiotic resistance phenotypes in feces of humans, cattle, and horses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:6914–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Schlager TA, Hendley JO, Bell AL, Whittam TS. Clonal diversity of Escherichia coli colonizing stools and urinary tracts of young girls. Infect Immun. 2002;70:1225–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Renter DG, Sargeant JM, Oberst RD, Samadpour M. Diversity, frequency, and persistence of Escherichia coli O157 strains from range cattle environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:542–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Lidin-Janson G, Kaijser B, Lincoln K, Olling S, Wedel H. The homogeneity of the faecal coliform flora of normal school-girls, characterized by serological and biochemical properties. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1978;164:247–53. [PubMed]
8. Maslow JN, Lee B, Lautenbach E. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli carriage in long term care facility. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:889–94. [PubMed]Lautenbach E, Bilker WB, Johnson JR. Colonization with extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli among nursing home residents and its relationship to fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:3618–20. [PubMed]
9. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2233–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. MacAdam H, Zaoutis TE, Gasink LB, Bilker WB, Lautenbach E. Investigating the association between antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance: Impact of different methods of categorizing prior antibiotic use. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;28:325–32. [PubMed]