PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Hypertens. Author manuscript; available in PMC Mar 1, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2663916
NIHMSID: NIHMS89882
Association of 77 Polymorphisms in 52 Candidate Genes with Blood Pressure Progression and Incident Hypertension: The Women’s Genome Health Study
David Conen, MD MPH,1 Suzanne Cheng, PhD,2 Lori L. Steiner, BS,2 Julie E. Buring, ScD,1 Paul M Ridker, MD MPH,1 and Robert Y.L. Zee, PhD1
1 Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
2 Department of Human Genetics, Roche Molecular Systems Inc, Alameda, CA
Correspondence and request of reprints: David Conen, Cardiology Division, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland, Phone: +41 61 265 25 25, Fax: +41 61 265 45 98, E-mail: conend/at/uhbs.ch, OR, Robert Y.L. Zee, Division of Preventive Medicine; Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Avenue East; Boston MA 02215, Phone: 617 732-8175, E-mail: rzee/at/rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Objective
Genetic risk factors for essential hypertension are largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the association of 77 previously characterized gene variants in 52 candidate genes from various biological pathways with blood pressure progression and incident hypertension.
Methods
We analyzed data from 18738 Caucasian women who participated in a prospective cohort study and were free of hypertension at baseline. Blood pressure progression at 48 months and incident hypertension during the entire follow-up according to the different genotypes were assessed by logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models, respectively.
Results
At 48 months of follow-up, 7889 of 16635 women (47.4%) had blood pressure progression. Only three of 70 polymorphisms with a minor allele frequency ≥2% had a significant association with blood pressure progression. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)) for MTHFR rs1801133 (minor allele T), NPPA rs5063 (minor allele A) and NPPA rs5065 (minor allele C) were 1.05 (1.00–1.10), 0.84 (0.76–0.94) and 0.93 (0.88–1.00), respectively. After adjustment for multiple testing using the false discovery rate, only the NPPA rs5063 association remained significant. During a median follow-up of 9.8 years, 5540 of 18738 women developed incident hypertension. Only five of 70 polymorphisms were significantly associated with incident hypertension. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for IL6 rs1800795 (minor allele C), MTHFR rs1801133, NPPA rs5063, NOS3 rs1799983 (minor allele T) and TGFB1 rs1800469 (minor allele T) were 0.96 (0.92–1.00), 1.06 (1.02–1.10), 0.88 (0.80–0.96), 1.05 (1.01–1.09) and 1.05 (1.01–1.10), respectively. After adjustment for multiple testing, none of these associations remained significant.
Conclusion
NPPA gene polymorphisms may have a role in blood pressure progression and incident hypertension. Our data also provide moderate confirmatory evidence of association between MTHFR rs1801133 and hypertension.
Keywords: Blood pressure, Hypertension, Gene polymorphism, Natriuretic peptide precursor A, Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase
Although obesity and other environmental factors substantially contribute to the high incidence of essential hypertension (1, 2), several studies suggest that in human beings a significant part of the inter-individual variability of blood pressure is heritable (3, 4). In a population based sample, Tobin et al estimated the heritability of mean 24-hour blood pressure to be about 65% (4).
The exploration of genetic risk factors of hypertension is an important research priority, due to the high prevalence of the disorder and the potential for improved risk prediction and novel antihypertensive drug targets. Consequently, a multitude of biological pathways of interest have been investigated in recent years (5). For example, natriuretic peptides and the renin angiotensin system play a significant role in the regulation of vascular tone and sodium homeostasis (6, 7), making genetic polymorphisms within these pathways valid candidates to predict an individual’s risk of blood pressure progression and incident hypertension. Because of the consistent association between elevated plasma levels of C-reactive protein and incident hypertension (810), inflammation-modulating polymorphisms might also be implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension.
Unfortunately, prior studies assessing candidate genes for hypertension were predominantly small and provided inconsistent results. As demonstrated recently, population stratification and publication bias may explain an important part of this inconsistency (11, 12). Therefore, information from large, prospective cohort studies is needed to elucidate the small effects of genetic variants in the pathogenesis of complex diseases. In this context, the Women’s Genome Health Study (WGHS) provides a unique opportunity to prospectively assess the relationship between a multitude of candidate gene polymorphisms and the risk of blood pressure progression and incident hypertension.
Participants
All study subjects were participants of the WGHS (13). The WGHS comprises a large-scale genetic epidemiological study in initially healthy women participating in the National Institute of Health funded Women’s Health Study (1416) who provided a baseline blood sample for DNA analysis before randomization and were then prospectively followed for incident disease events.
Information on baseline variables was collected by mailed questionnaires. Follow-up questionnaires asking participants about study outcomes and other information were sent every six months during the first year and every 12 months thereafter. Follow-up information from randomization through the end of the trial, March 31, 2004 was used for this analysis. For the present study, we included 18738 Caucasian women who were free of hypertension, did not receive antihypertensive drugs at baseline, and who had complete information on all covariates included in the multivariable models. We recently showed within this cohort that the reporting of Caucasian ancestry was highly reliable and that there was no evidence of population sub-stratification (17). Median follow-up for this sample population was 9.8 years (interquartile range 6.6–10.5 years). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and was monitored by an external data and safety monitoring board.
Study variables
We assessed the relationship of blood pressure progression and incident hypertension with 77 previously described gene polymorphisms in 52 candidate genes. The findings for a small number of these polymorphisms have been published previously (18, 19). The candidate genes examined were selected from biochemical pathways that have been implicated in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (20, 21). In addition to the biological relevance of the selected candidate genes, the polymorphisms were further selected based on prior evidence of potential functionality, validated allele frequency and heterozygosity, and sequence-proven allelic variation.
Blood pressure at randomization was self-reported by the female health professionals, a group where self-report of blood pressure has proven highly accurate (2224). Participating women categorized their blood pressure levels into nine categories of systolic blood pressure and seven categories of diastolic blood pressure. For the purpose of this study, women were classified into three predefined blood pressure categories: below 120 mmHg for systolic and 75 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure; 120 to 129 mmHg for systolic or 75 to 84 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure; and 130 to 139 mmHg for systolic or 85 to 89 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (25). Women with discordant systolic and diastolic blood pressure categories were classified into the higher category.
Other covariates of interest were ascertained at study entry and included age, smoking, history of hypercholesterolemia (self-reported cholesterol of at least 240 mg/dl (6.22 mmol/l)), body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), and history of diabetes.
Outcome assessment
First, we assessed blood pressure progression at 48 months. For this analysis, we created categories of self-reported blood pressure at 48 months of follow-up identical to those at baseline. Blood pressure progression was defined by progressing at least one blood pressure category compared to baseline, or by a new diagnosis of hypertension during the first 48 months of follow-up. Because of missing blood pressure information at 48 months, cardiovascular events or death during the first 48 months of follow-up, we excluded 2103 participants from these analyses.
Second, we assessed cases of incident hypertension during the entire follow-up period of 9.8 years. Incident cases of hypertension were defined by meeting at least one of the following criteria: self-report of a new physician diagnosis of hypertension assessed at years 1, 3 and yearly thereafter; self-report of antihypertensive treatment assessed at years 1, 3 and 4; or self-reported systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg.
Women reporting a new physician diagnosis of hypertension also provided month and year of diagnosis. For a diagnosis defined by another criterion or a missing date for a physician diagnosis, a date between the current and the previous questionnaire was randomly assigned. Women who developed cardiovascular disease for which the management may affect blood pressure levels, were censored at the date of diagnosis and not considered at risk for incident hypertension thereafter. All 18738 women were included in the incident hypertension analyses.
Genotype determination
Genotyping was performed in the context of a multimarker assay using an immobilized probe approach, as previously described (Roche Molecular Systems, Alameda, CA) (20, 21). In brief, each DNA sample was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with pooled biotinylated primers. Each PCR product pool was then hybridized to a panel of sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes immobilized in a linear array. The colorimetric detection method was based on the use of streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase conjugate with hydrogen peroxide and 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine as substrates. Genotype assignment was performed using proprietary Roche Molecular Systems image processing software. To confirm genotype assignment, scoring was carried out by two independent observers. Discordant results (<1% of all scoring) were resolved by a joint reading, and where necessary, a repeat genotyping. Genotyping completion rate was ≥95% for all genetic variants assessed in this study.
Statistical analysis
We calculated allele frequencies and performed a Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test using an exact method. To compare the risk of blood pressure progression and incident hypertension across genotype groups, we used logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. We pre-specified that polymorphisms with a minor allele frequency <2% would be excluded from the analyses. Separate models were constructed for each genotype, always assuming an additive model only. The common wild type was used as the reference group. In a first step, age-adjusted models were constructed. Thereafter, we fitted multivariable models adjusting for age, smoking, baseline blood pressure category, history of diabetes, body mass index, history of hypercholesterolemia, and randomized treatment assignments (aspirin, vitamin E and beta carotene). Given the similarity of the results, only multivariable adjusted models are presented in this manuscript. To adjust for multiple hypothesis testing, we applied the false discovery rate (FDR) using the PROC MULTTEST procedure in SAS (26). Although no universal FDR significance threshold has been defined, previous candidate gene studies used a value of 0.20 (27), meaning that one should expect at most 20% of declared discoveries to be false.
Categorical variables were entered in the regression models using binary indicator variables. Interactions were assessed by comparing the likelihood ratio with and without the interaction terms in the models. The proportional hazards assumption was examined for all models by including a genotype by logarithm of time interaction into the model (28). At the 0.05 level, this assumption was formally violated for two genetic polymorphisms, both p values being 0.04. Given the large number of polymorphisms tested and the large sample size of the cohort, we did not consider these p values as evidence for a significant violation of the proportional hazards assumption. All analyses were carried out using SAS version 9 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
Baseline characteristics of the 18738 non-hypertensive women are shown in Table 1. Mean age and body mass index were 54 ± 7 years and 25.1 ± 4.4 kg/m2, respectively, 44.5% had a baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg and 75 mmHg, respectively, 39.2% had a systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure between 120 and 129 mmHg and/or 75 and 84 mmHg, respectively and 16.3% had a systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure between 130 and 139 mmHg and/or 85 and 89 mmHg, respectively.
Table 1
Table 1
Baseline characteristics
As shown in Table 2, seven of the 77 polymorphisms (9%) had a minor allele frequency <2% and were therefore excluded from further analysis. After Bonferroni correction, four of the remaining polymorphisms were not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (ACE rs1799752 p<0.0001, CSF2 rs25882 p<0.0001, FGB rs1800790 p<0.0001, and MS4A2 rs569108 p<0.0001). Based on our stringent genotyping criteria, we believe that genotyping error is unlikely and that the most likely reason for these findings is chance in association with a large sample size. Moreover, the observed allele frequencies of the four genetic variants correspond to those reported elsewhere (29, 30).
Table 2
Table 2
Genetic polymorphisms evaluated in the study
At 48 months of follow-up, 7889 of 16635 women (47.4%) had blood pressure progression. Multivariable regression analyses are shown in Table 3. Overall, only three of the 70 polymorphisms (4%) were statistically significant at the 0.05 level. The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for MTHFR rs1801133, NPPA rs5063 and NPPA rs5065 were 1.05 (1.00–1.10), 0.84 (0.76–0.94) and 0.93 (0.88–1.00), respectively. The FDR values for these three polymorphisms were 0.70, 0.10 and 0.70, respectively.
Table 3
Table 3
Gene variants and risk of blood pressure progression
During a median follow-up of 9.8 years, 5540 of 18738 women developed incident hypertension. As shown in Table 4, the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models revealed that only five of 70 polymorphisms (7%) were significantly associated with incident hypertension at the 0.05 level. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for IL6 rs1800795, MTHFR rs1801133, NPPA rs5063, NOS3 rs1799983 and TGFB1 rs1800469 were 0.96 (0.92–1.00), 1.06 (1.02–1.10), 0.88 (0.80–0.96), 1.05 (1.01–1.09) and 1.05 (1.01–1.10), respectively. The corresponding FDR values for these five polymorphisms were 0.50, 0.22, 0.22, 0.44 and 0.40, respectively.
Table 4
Table 4
Gene variants and risk of incident hypertension
Taken together, only the NPPA rs5063 and MTHFR rs1801133 gene variants were consistently associated with both blood pressure progression at 48 months and incident hypertension over the entire follow-up period. While statistically significant for blood pressure progression, the association between incident hypertension and NPPA rs5065 was of borderline statistical significance (p=0.06). We previously published detailed results of the association between these two NPPA polymorphisms and blood pressure progression or incident hypertension (18). With regard to MTHFR rs1801133, the association with blood pressure progression and incident hypertension was consistent and independent of baseline blood pressure. After stratification according to baseline blood pressure, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) for each minor allele copy across increasing blood pressure categories was 1.10 (1.02–1.18), 0.98 (0.91–1.06) and 1.08 (0.96–1.21) for blood pressure progression, and 1.07 (0.99–1.17), 1.05 (0.99–1.12), and 1.05 (0.98–1.12) for incident hypertension. Accordingly, genotype by baseline blood pressure interactions in the non-stratified regression models were not statistically significant (p=0.73 and p=0.89, respectively).
In this prospective study, we assessed the relationship of 70 candidate polymorphisms with blood pressure progression and incident hypertension. After adjustment for multiple testing, only the NPPA rs5063 polymorphism remained significantly associated with blood pressure progression (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.84 (0.76–0.94); FDR=0.10). The association between this polymorphism and risk of incident hypertension was of borderline significance after adjustment for multiple testing (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.88 (0.80–0.96); FDR=0.22). As we pointed out in our previous publication, replication of this finding in a different cohort is needed to confirm the implication of the NPPA gene in the pathogenesis of hypertension (18).
Out of the remaining 69 polymorphisms, the MTHFR rs1801133 variant was the only one that was consistently associated with both blood pressure progression and incident hypertension before adjustment for multiple testing. In this context, it is important to note that the present study had enough power to detect small-to-moderate associations. For incident hypertension, assuming a univariate-additive model, a power of 80%, and an alpha level of 0.05, the study had the ability to detect a relative risk of more than 1.10 if the minor allele frequency is 0.50 and of more than 1.30 if the minor allele frequency is 0.01. A relative risk of 1.30 for a single polymorphism seems to be unrealistic and we empirically decided to use a minor allele frequency of 2% as our cut-off for inclusion. The relative risk estimate (95% confidence interval) for incident hypertension per additional minor allele was 1.06 (1.02–1.10). The FDR of 0.22 was of borderline significance. Interestingly, a recent meta-analysis of several small case control studies suggested a relationship between the T-allele of rs1801133 and hypertension (31), with a summary relative risk estimate of 1.24 (1.02–1.50) among minor allele homozygotes. Taken together, the present report in combination with the recent meta-analysis suggest that the MTHFR rs1801133 gene variant may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension, despite the fact that in the present study the association was not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing.
From a functional perspective, the MTHFR rs1801133 polymorphism leads to an alanine-to-valine substitution at position 677 (677 C>T). As a consequence, a thermolabile enzyme with decreased activity is produced, TT homozygotes having a 50% reduction in enzyme activity (32). In this cohort, we recently demonstrated different homocysteine levels across MTHFR rs1801133 genotypes, supporting the possibility of a true association with blood pressure progression and incident hypertension (33). However, more studies are needed to assess the potential role of the MTHFR metabolism in the pathogenesis of hypertension.
The candidate gene approach relies on prior knowledge of biological pathways and its associations with disease. Therefore, this approach makes discoveries within new or unknown pathways unlikely. In recent years, genome-wide association studies of common complex diseases using 300,000 to 500,000 polymorphisms per individual have become available. These studies have elucidated consistent risk loci for several cardiovascular risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes (3436) and dyslipidemia (3739), and have provided interesting insights in the pathophysiology of these disorders. Unfortunately, the only large genome wide association study for hypertension published so far failed to identify polymorphisms that are significantly associated with hypertension after adjustment for multiple testing (36), highlighting the need for more large scale, carefully designed studies in this important area. In this context, participants of the WGHS are currently undergoing genotyping for more than 360’000 polymorphisms, and more detailed results concerning the association between genetic polymorphisms and hypertension are expected in future analyses (13).
Strengths and limitations
Strengths of the present study are the large sample size, the number of polymorphisms considered, the prospective design and the long-term follow-up with a large number of incident cases. Potential limitations of our study also require discussion. First, this study included only Caucasian female health professionals, and our findings may not be generalizable to other populations. Second, we used self-reported blood pressure and hypertension status. However, the prognostic value of self-reported blood pressure in cohort studies involving US health professionals is similar compared to directly measured blood pressure values in participants of other cohort studies (22). Furthermore, the validity of this approach has been examined in the comparable Nurses’ Health Study, where 99% of the women who reported high blood pressure levels had their diagnosis confirmed based on medical record review (23). Moreover in this cohort, self-reported blood pressure, total cholesterol and body mass index have previously been shown to be strong predictors of cardiovascular risk, with relative risks consistent in magnitude with those observed in other major studies (24, 40, 41). However, given the limited precision of blood pressure assessment in categories at baseline, it has to be emphasized that we cannot exclude a small blood pressure effect of the genotypes evaluated in the current study. Another limitation of this study is the lack of information on dietary intake and renal function, two important factors in development of hypertension. Furthermore, hypertension may be a heterogeneous entity and this study does not exclude the possibility that some of the genetic variants assessed are associated with a more homogeneous form of hypertension. This study also relied on the assumption that common genetic variants have a significant role in the pathogenesis of blood pressure progression and incident hypertension, an as yet unproven hypothesis. Finally, the assessment of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions was beyond the scope of this study. Future studies are needed to explore in detail this important issue.
Conclusion
This large, prospective study among initially healthy women indicates that NPPA gene polymorphisms may have a role in blood pressure progression and incident hypertension. Although the MTHFR rs1801133 polymorphism failed to meet the criteria for association after adjustment for multiple testing, this study validates findings from previous small studies and implicates a potential involvement of the MTHFR rs1801133 gene variant in the risk of developing hypertension. Future large scale studies using comprehensive genome wide analysis techniques are needed to further elucidate the genetics of hypertension.
Acknowledgments
Funding sources
This study was supported by grants HL-43851 and CA-47988 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the National Cancer Institute. David Conen is supported by grants of the Swiss National Science Foundation (PASMA 118586/1). Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Alameda, CA, and F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland supported the genotype determinations financially and with in-kind contribution of reagents and consumables.
Footnotes
Disclosures
Suzanne Cheng and Lori L. Steiner are Employee of Roche Molecular Systems Inc. No other disclosures applicable to this manuscript.
1. Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet. 2005;366:1197–209. [PubMed]
2. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365:217–23. [PubMed]
3. Luft FC. Twins in cardiovascular genetic research. Hypertension. 2001;37:350–6. [PubMed]
4. Tobin MD, Raleigh SM, Newhouse S, Braund P, Bodycote C, Ogleby J, et al. Association of WNK1 gene polymorphisms and haplotypes with ambulatory blood pressure in the general population. Circulation. 2005;112:3423–9. [PubMed]
5. Cowley AW., Jr The genetic dissection of essential hypertension. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:829–40. [PubMed]
6. Levin ER, Gardner DG, Samson WK. Natriuretic peptides. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:321–8. [PubMed]
7. Weir MR, Dzau VJ. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a specific target for hypertension management. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12:205S–213S. [PubMed]
8. Sesso HD, Buring JE, Rifai N, Blake GJ, Gaziano JM, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein and the risk of developing hypertension. JAMA. 2003;290:2945–51. [PubMed]
9. Niskanen L, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssonen K, Punnonen K, Valkonen VP, Fuentes R, et al. Inflammation, abdominal obesity, and smoking as predictors of hypertension. Hypertension. 2004;44:859–65. [PubMed]
10. Wang TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Tofler GH, et al. Multiple biomarkers and the risk of incident hypertension. Hypertension. 2007;49:432–8. [PubMed]
11. Bennet AM, Di Angelantonio E, Ye Z, Wensley F, Dahlin A, Ahlbom A, et al. Association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with lipid levels and coronary risk. JAMA. 2007;298:1300–11. [PubMed]
12. Pereira TV, Rudnicki M, Cheung BM, Baum L, Yamada Y, Oliveira PS, et al. Three endothelial nitric oxide (NOS3) gene polymorphisms in hypertensive and normotensive individuals: meta-analysis of 53 studies reveals evidence of publication bias. J Hypertens. 2007;25:1763–74. [PubMed]
13. Ridker PM, Chasman DI, Zee RY, Parker A, Rose L, Cook NR, et al. Rationale, Design, and Methodology of the Women’s Genome Health Study: A Genome-Wide Association Study of More Than 25 000 Initially Healthy American Women. Clin Chem. 2008;54:249–255. [PubMed]
14. Rexrode KM, Lee IM, Cook NR, Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Baseline characteristics of participants in the Women’s Health Study. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9:19–27. [PubMed]
15. Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, Gordon D, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1293–304. [PubMed]
16. Lee IM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, Gordon D, Ridker PM, Manson JE, et al. Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: the Women’s Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:56–65. [PubMed]
17. Pare G, Chasman DI, Kellogg M, Zee RY, Rifai N, Badola S, et al. Novel association of ABO histo-blood group antigen with soluble ICAM-1: results of a genome-wide association study of 6,578 women. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000118. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Conen D, Glynn RJ, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Zee RY. Natriuretic peptide precursor a gene polymorphisms and risk of blood pressure progression and incident hypertension. Hypertension. 2007;50:1114–9. [PubMed]
19. Conen D, Glynn RJ, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Zee RY. Association of renin-angiotensin and endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms with blood pressure progression and incident hypertension: prospective cohort study. J Hypertens. 2008 In press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Cheng S, Grow MA, Pallaud C, Klitz W, Erlich HA, Visvikis S, et al. A multilocus genotyping assay for candidate markers of cardiovascular disease risk. Genome Res. 1999;9:936–49. [PubMed]
21. Barcellos LF, Begovich AB, Reynolds RL, Caillier SJ, Brassat D, Schmidt S, et al. Linkage and association with the NOS2A locus on chromosome 17q11 in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:793–800. [PubMed]
22. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13. [PubMed]
23. Colditz GA, Martin P, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Sampson L, Rosner B, et al. Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:894–900. [PubMed]
24. Conen D, Ridker PM, Buring JE, Glynn RJ. Risk of cardiovascular events among women with high normal blood pressure or blood pressure progression: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2007;335:432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) J Hypertens. 2007;25:1105–87. [PubMed]
26. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57:289–300.
27. Smith NL, Hindorff LA, Heckbert SR, Lemaitre RN, Marciante KD, Rice K, et al. Association of genetic variations with nonfatal venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women. JAMA. 2007;297:489–98. [PubMed]
28. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J Roy Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187–220.
29. Arnett DK, Davis BR, Ford CE, Boerwinkle E, Leiendecker-Foster C, Miller MB, et al. Pharmacogenetic association of the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism on blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in relation to antihypertensive treatment: the Genetics of Hypertension-Associated Treatment (GenHAT) study. Circulation. 2005;111:3374–83. [PubMed]
31. Qian X, Lu Z, Tan M, Liu H, Lu D. A meta-analysis of association between C677T polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene and hypertension. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15:1239–45. [PubMed]
32. Kluijtmans LA, Young IS, Boreham CA, Murray L, McMaster D, McNulty H, et al. Genetic and nutritional factors contributing to hyperhomocysteinemia in young adults. Blood. 2003;101:2483–8. [PubMed]
33. Zee RY, Mora S, Cheng S, Erlich HA, Lindpaintner K, Rifai N, et al. Homocysteine, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C>T polymorphism, nutrient intake, and incident cardiovascular disease in 24,968 initially healthy women. Clin Chem. 2007;53:845–51. [PubMed]
34. Saxena R, Voight BF, Lyssenko V, Burtt NP, de Bakker PI, Chen H, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science. 2007;316:1331–6. [PubMed]
35. Sladek R, Rocheleau G, Rung J, Dina C, Shen L, Serre D, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2007;445:881–5. [PubMed]
36. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447:661–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Kathiresan S, Melander O, Guiducci C, Surti A, Burtt NP, Rieder MJ, et al. Six new loci associated with blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides in humans. Nat Genet. 2008;40:189–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Willer CJ, Sanna S, Jackson AU, Scuteri A, Bonnycastle LL, Clarke R, et al. Newly identified loci that influence lipid concentrations and risk of coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40:161–9. [PubMed]
39. Sandhu MS, Waterworth DM, Debenham SL, Wheeler E, Papadakis K, Zhao JH, et al. LDL-cholesterol concentrations: a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2008;371:483–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Kurth T, Gaziano JM, Rexrode KM, Kase CS, Cook NR, Manson JE, et al. Prospective study of body mass index and risk of stroke in apparently healthy women. Circulation. 2005;111:1992–8. [PubMed]
41. Huang PY, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Glynn RJ. Awareness, accuracy, and predictive validity of self-reported cholesterol in women. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:606–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]