Although viral load control in HIV-infected patients is an attainable goal with the current potent c-ART regimen, the magnitude of CD4
+ cell restoration among patients remains variable (
4–
7). Immune restoration is predicted by several imprinted factors, some of which — such as age, genetic background, history of infection, and nadir of CD4
+ cells — are beyond the reach of therapeutic intervention (
37–
43). Nevertheless, the length of time patients spend with low CD4
+ T cell counts is clearly associated with a higher morbidity in HIV-infected patients (
9,
10,
12–
14). This suggests that a new frontier in HIV therapy may be defined by the maintenance of a high level of CD4
+ T cells.
Common γ chain cytokines IL-2 and IL-7 play a critical role in T cell homeostasis and T cell survival. Both cytokines represent promising immunotherapeutic strategies for the preservation and restoration of the T cell pool in lymphopenic conditions. Administration of IL-2 cycles leads to a significant and exclusive increase in peripheral CD4
+ T cell counts in HIV-infected patients (
44–
47). Although the potential benefit of IL-2 therapy is currently under evaluation in phase III studies, a large set of clinical data shows that its use is limited by a high frequency of acute toxic effects that lead to discontinuation of therapy. Several preclinical studies show that IL-7 administration in mice and primates is safe and has a significant impact on T cell homeostasis (
25,
30,
48,
49). Recently, rhIL-7 administration in cancer patients has provided interesting and encouraging results for its clinical use (
31,
50). However, IL-7 therapy at supraphysiologic doses in HIV-infected individuals initially raised several specific issues surrounding the complex mechanisms of T cell depletion associated with HIV infection and the potential risk of viral replication (
35,
51). To address these questions regarding rhIL-7 administration in HIV-infected patients, we conducted a prospective multicenter study. We demonstrate herein that repeated administration of rhIL-7 was safely associated with robust and sustained increases in circulating CD4
+ and CD8
+ lymphocytes in chronically HIV-infected patients with persistently low CD4
+ T cell counts despite virologic suppression under c-ART. These effects were clearly dose dependent and already significant at lower doses. We showed that expanded CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cells remained functional and responded in vitro to TCR stimulation and produced intracellular cytokines after polyclonal and antigen-specific stimulation. Interestingly enough, in the context of HIV chronic lymphopenic T cell depletion, increases in CD4
+ cells remained significant more than 45 wk after cessation of IL-7 administration.
Naive and memory T cells are both dependent on IL-7 for survival and homeostatic regulation in lymphopenic conditions (
52,
53). In the setting of HIV infection, the dynamics of CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cell subsets are severely perturbed. Several factors influence these defects, including the level of virus replication, imbalance of cytokine production, dysregulation of cytokine receptor expression, and chronic immune activation (
18). A high proportion of HIV-specific CD8
+ cells also loses expression of IL-7Rα and exhibits an activated memory phenotype (
54,
55). During HIV infection, as in other lymphopenic conditions, IL-7 plasma levels are increased (
56–
58) and correlate with sustained downregulation of IL-7Rα on naive and memory T cells (
59). Whether circulating levels of IL-7 explain the downregulation of CD127 expression on T cells remains unclear, since the ligand-binding receptor usually results in a transient downmodulation of the cytokine receptor. A more likely explanation is that downmodulation of CD127 expression represents a state of cell differentiation driven by HIV-mediated chronic immune activation. More recently, a relative expansion of CD4
+CD127
–CD25
– T cells exhibiting features of activated effector cells has been reported in HIV-infected subjects (
60). Expansion of these cells may be driven by chronic immune activation and have detrimental effects of the homeostasis of naive and central memory T cells in the periphery. Interestingly, we found that IL-7 therapy led to a significant increase of naive and central memory CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cell populations that are usually functionally impaired and prone to T cell exhaustion in HIV infection. Regarding the expected expansion of terminally differentiated effector cells observed in HIV infection (
61,
62), generally our results showed that IL-7 therapy may reshape the balance of T cell subsets in favor of naive and central memory T cells in HIV-infected subjects.
The mechanisms of T cell expansion during IL-7 therapy may involve T cell cycling, increased thymic output, and T cell survival. Whether the thymic output contributes to the reconstitution of the T cell pool in IL-7–treated HIV patients is not easy to assess. In patients treated with 10-μg/kg rhIL-7, precise analysis of the earliest subset of naive CD4
+ T cells showed a significant increase in naive CD4
+ T cells expressing a high density of the CD31 antigen (CD4
+CD45RA
+CD27
+CD31
hi), a marker recently used to identify RTEs (
29). This result might suggest an effect of IL-7 on thymic output. However, we were unable to confirm this effect, because the low number of these cells did not allow us to analyze their TREC content, which would have provided an indirect measure of thymic output (
63). Nevertheless, analysis of sorted RTEs in cancer patients treated with IL-7 showed a dilution of TREC content related to the high level of cycling cells in this subset (
31). The same result would be expected in our study, given the high level of Ki67
+ cells within the naive CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cell subsets (Figure ). On the other hand, the contribution of increased thymic output to the changes in naive CD4
+ T cell expansion could be delayed for months and requires further evaluation in patients receiving chronic IL-7 therapy. As assessed by Ki67 staining, rhIL-7 therapy induced a peak of cell proliferation in the different populations of CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cells. It is noteworthy that this effect was not associated with increased expression of activation markers on CD4
+ T cells. The same experiments performed 2 or 10 wk after cessation of IL-7 administration showed that the level of T cell cycling returned to baseline in all patients. At the same time points, the majority of patients maintained a level of CD4
+ T cells significantly higher than that at baseline. Together, these data suggest that IL-7 expanded T cells may result from 2 phases: a first phase related to a rise in CD4
+ T cells caused by an acute effect on cell proliferation, and a second phase raising the possibility of a preferential effect on T cell survival.
From a clinical standpoint, one concern is a possible refractory response to repeated administrations of rhIL-7 related to the downmodulation of IL-7Rα on expanded cells. Although the schedule of administration of IL-7 in our study and in cancer patients seems empirical, administration every other day was based upon data in primate models showing that IL-7 induced transient downmodulation of its receptor on peripheral T cells (
48). We did not check for the kinetics of IL-7Rα expression immediately following IL-7 administration. However, in the long-term follow-up, we found that rhIL-7–expanded T cells continuously expressed IL-7Rα. Moreover, although not glycosylated, rhIL-7 did not elicit neutralizing antibodies, and no patient had experienced lymphopenia after 1 year of follow-up. The population of patients selected in this study failed to restore CD4
+ T cell counts despite a lengthy period of c-ART and prolonged suppression of viral replication. Our results showed that this population should benefit most from IL-7 therapy, since tolerated doses caused significantly increased CD4
+ T cell counts. On the other hand, correlation between baseline CD4
+ cell counts and the CD4 response to IL-7 suggests that the population selected may be the group that responds less to IL-7. Therefore, when considering the future of IL-7 studies, lower doses should still continue to be evaluated, because a stronger effect of IL-7 at lower doses could be expected in less immunocompromised patients. One clinical consequence of these observations is that IL-7 might represent a promising cytokine for treatment of chronic lymphopenic conditions such as HIV disease, where sustained therapy is required over many years.
One possible limitation of the use of IL-7 in HIV settings was raised by experimental data showing that IL-7 may enhance HIV replication (
35,
36). In addition, IL-7 induces a state of virus permissiveness in quiescent or naive CD4
+ T cells (
64). Finally, in vitro, IL-7 powerfully stimulates transcription and replication of quiescent HIV provirus integrated in mononuclear cells from patients (
51,
65). This effect appeared to be more potent and qualitatively different than that with IL-2, since quasispecies reactivated by both cytokines were widely distinct (
51). In our study, patients treated at the 3-μg/kg dose did not experience any blips in viral replication. In contrast, 4 of 7 patients treated with the 10-μg/kg dose had transient and limited peaks of viral replication within the period of IL-7 administration or at 12 wk. The explanation for these blips is unclear, because we did not find any obvious clinical (lack of therapy adherence, drug interaction, changes in drug regimen, or intercurrent infection) or immunological (markers of cell activation) explanation. However, we found that IL-7 did not affect the pool of CD4
+ infected cells, as assessed by the constant values of HIV DNA content in PBMCs or CD4
+ T cells throughout the study. Final interpretation of the effects of IL-7 in vivo on viral replication is limited by the absence of a control group in our study. Nevertheless, these results underscore the importance of carefully monitoring viral load in future randomized studies. It is also interesting to note that all 4 patients with transient viral replication exhibited a significant rise in the frequency of IL-2/IFN-γ HIV-Gag–specific CD4
+ T cell responses. This observation might have immunological and clinical consequences for the future development of rhIL-7 in immunocompromised patients. First, it demonstrates that expanded CD4
+ T cells under rhIL-7 therapy are functional and capable of responding to TCR stimulation. Second, it suggests that the capacity of rhIL-7 to stimulate responses to transient and weak antigenic challenges may be a rationale for the clinical use of this cytokine as a powerful immunotherapeutic agent to boost vaccine-induced T cell memory (
32). Thus, this potential effect of rhIL-7 therapy on viral replication may represent both a concern and an opportunity for the use of IL-7 as an agent that may mobilize latent reservoirs and T cell memory anamnestic responses, like those recently demonstrated in murine models of chronic viral infection (
33).
Broadly viewed, this clinical study — which we believe to be the first — of repeated IL-7 administration in chronically lymphopenic HIV-infected patients presents evidence that rhIL-7 therapy is better tolerated compared with other immunotherapeutic strategies. The effects of IL-7 on naive and memory subpopulations could restore a homeostatic equilibrium not achieved by the control of viral load alone under c-ART. This reshaping of the immune system is associated with conserved functional properties of T cells and a low level of immune activation. Moreover, the pharmacokinetic properties of IL-7 offer the possibility of an intermittent therapy as an adjunct to ongoing c-ART. The next generation of glycosylated IL-7, characterized by a longer half-life and better in vivo stability compared with the E. coli–produced molecule used in the present study, should permit the development of an optimized therapeutic strategy with less frequent injections of IL-7, thus providing a more convenient schedule for administration in patients. Furthermore, the good profile of glycosylation should lead to less immunogenicity and allow for additional cycles of treatment. These properties may confer a clinical benefit that should be demonstrated in future large-scale randomized clinical studies.