CDKN1C (p57KIP2) Is a Direct Target of EZH2 and Suppressed by Multiple Epigenetic Mechanisms in Breast Cancer Cells

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005011

PLoS ONE. 2009; 4(4): e5011.

Published online 2009 April 2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005011

PMCID: PMC2659786

Copyright Yang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

CDKN1C (p57^KIP2) Is a Direct Target of EZH2 and Suppressed by Multiple Epigenetic Mechanisms in Breast Cancer Cells

Xiaojing Yang,^1,² R. K. Murthy Karuturi,³ Feng Sun,^1,⁴ Meiyee Aau,¹ Kun Yu,⁵ Rongguang Shao,² Lance D. Miller,¹ Patrick Boon Ooi Tan,^5,⁶ and Qiang Yu¹^*

¹Cancer Biology and Pharmacology, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Biopolis, Singapore

²Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

³Information and Mathematical Science, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Biopolis, Singapore

⁴Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

⁵Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

⁶Cell and Medical Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Biopolis, Singapore

Mikhail V. Blagosklonny, Editor

Ordway Research Institute, United States of America

* E-mail: yuq/at/gis.a-star.edu.sg

Conceived and designed the experiments: XY RGS QY. Performed the experiments: XY MA. Analyzed the data: XY RKMK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RKMK FS KY LDM PT. Wrote the paper: PT.

Received December 17, 2008; Accepted March 4, 2009.

This article has been corrected. See PLoS ONE. 2009 April 13; 4(4): 10.1371/annotation/e70583a2-3581-4848-b1e3-b518ac07d3a6.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

CDKN1C (encoding tumor suppressor p57^KIP2) is a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor whose family members are often transcriptionally downregulated in human cancer via promoter DNA methylation. In this study, we show that CDKN1C is repressed in breast cancer cells mainly through histone modifications. In particular, we show that CDKN1C is targeted by histone methyltransferase EZH2-mediated histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), and can be strongly activated by inhibition of EZH2 in synergy with histone deacetylase inhibitor. Consistent with the overexpression of EZH2 in a variety of human cancers including breast cancer, CDKN1C in these cancers is downregulated, and breast tumors expressing low levels of CDKN1C are associated with a poor prognosis. We further show that assessing both EZH2 and CDKN1C expression levels as a measurement of EZH2 pathway activity provides a more predictive power of disease outcome than that achieved with EZH2 or CDKN1C alone. Taken together, our study reveals a novel epigenetic mechanism governing CDKN1C repression in breast cancer. Importantly, as a newly identified EZH2 target with prognostic value, it has implications in patient stratification for cancer therapeutic targeting EZH2-mediated gene repression.

Introduction

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) are a large family of proteins that regulate cell cycle progression, cell proliferation and differentiation. CDKIs show widespread involvement in tumor suppression and are deregulated in many types of human cancers by genetic and epigenetic alterations. Loss of expression of CDKIs, such as p16^INK4A, due to promoter DNA hypermethylation, is frequent in human cancer and the CDKIs downregulation is associated with aberrant cell proliferation and tumor growth. In addition to promoter DNA methylation, histone modifications also play a role in inactivation of the CDK inhibitors. It has been shown that H3K9 methylation can occur at p16^INK4A independently of DNA methylation [1]. More recently, inactivation of the INK4A locus by other mechanisms such as Polycomb-associated histone H3K27 methylation have also been reported [2], [3], [4].

Pharmacological reagents have been used to understand the regulatory components of gene silencing in cancer. DNA methylation inhibitor 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-C) has been used extensively to restore the expression of genes silenced by DNA methylation [5], whereas histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors such as Trichostatin A (TSA) can induce gene expression by reversing repressed chromatin [6]. These two classes of agents can also act in synergy for the reactivation of epigenetically silenced genes [7]. In addition to histone deacetylation, histone methylation also contributes to gene silencing. In particular, Polycomb protein EZH2 (Enhancer of Zeste 2) is a histone methyltransferase that is often overexpressed in human cancers and is associated with cancer aggressiveness [8], [9]. EZH2 specifically methylates lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27), a repressive chromatin mark associated with gene silencing [10], [11], [12] and often represses target genes associated with growth control. It has been shown that EZH2-mediated gene repression requires HDAC activity [13] and its functional relationship to DNA methylation is also of current interest [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that inhibiting DNA methylation alone or even with the aid of HDAC inhibitors is insufficient to induce an euchromatic chromatin state due to the retention of repressive histone marks [19], [20]. These findings suggest that for a stable reversion of epigenetic silencing in cancer, a complete reversal from the malignant heterochromatin to a normal euchromatin is required.

CDK inhibitor CDKN1C (p57^KIP2) has been previously reported to be inactivated via promoter DNA methylation in a variety of human cancers [21], [22]. In this study, we report that the CDKN1C is repressed in breast cancer by multiple epigenetic mechanisms. We demonstrate that the CDKN1C gene is the target of EZH2-mediaed trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) that coordinates with histone deacetylation to suppress CDKN1C expression. Combined treatment of DZNep, an inhibitor of histone methylation [23], with HDAC inhibitor TSA causes a robust reactivation of CDKN1C expression. We also demonstrate the prognostic value of EZH2-mediated CDKN1C repression in breast cancer and suggest its clinical significance for EZH2-targeted cancer therapeutics.

Results

CDKN1C repression in breast cancer cells is associated with histone modifications independently of DNA methylation

We have previously reported that S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitor 3-Deazaneplanosin A (DZNep) is able to inhibit histone methylation and depletes the EZH2 complex and the associated H2K27 methylation [23] and combination of DZNep with HDAC inhibitor TSA resulted in robust activation of H3K27me3 target genes [16]. In an effort to comprehensively understand the epigenetic events in breast cancer, we performed gene expression analysis in various breast cancer cell lines treated with DZNep, TSA or Aza, alone or in various combinations. We found that CDKN1C can be strongly induced by a combination of DZNep and TSA treatment compared to a modest induction by Aza (see below). This finding suggests that CDKN1C expression in breast cancer is predominately regulated by histone modifications instead of DNA hypermethylation.

To validate this finding, we first examined the relationship between the DNA methylation status of the CDKN1C promoter and the levels of CDKN1C expression in various breast cancer cell lines as well as the non-cancerous breast epithelial cell line (MCF10A). To this end, we have used methylation-specific PCR (MSP) to examine three regions flanking the entire CpG island surrounding the transcription start site (TSS) (Figure 1A). We found that the immediate promoter regions (M2 and M3) appeared to be unmethylated in all the breast cancer cell lines tested (Figure 1B), though the similar regions have been previously found to be methylated in lung cancer [21]. In a more distal region (M1) 500 bp upstream of the TSS, DNA was found to methylated in certain breast cancer cell lines, including BT-474 and MDA-MB-231, as well as in MCF10A cells, indicating this methylation is not cancer specific (Figure 1B). Bisulfite genomic sequencing results further confirmed the lack of methylation in M2 and M3 regions in SK-BR-3, BT-474 and MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 1C). Examination of CDKN1C expression from our breast cancer cell lines gene expression database indicates that CDKN1C expression displayed varied levels of expression but in general was reduced in most of the breast cancer cell lines (except the MDA-MB-231 cells) as compared to MCF10A cells (Figure 1D). RT-PCR analysis further validated the array data (Figure 1D). Of important notice, the expression pattern of CDKN1C does not seem to correlate with the methylation status in these cell lines.

Figure 1

DNA methylation status of CDKN1C promoter in breast cancer cells.

We next set out to determine whether histone modifications are responsible for CDKN1C repression in breast cancer. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled with quantitative PCR to assess the following histone marks: the repressive chromatin marks H3K27me3, H3K9me3, H3K9me2, and H4K20me3, as well as activating H3K4me3 and acetylated histone (H3K9/14 ac) that are normally associated with gene activation. A series of PCR primer sets were designed to probe the 4 kb chromatin region surrounding the CDKN1C TSS (Figure 2A). We comprehensively characterized the chromatin state in SK-BR-3, BT-474, MDA-MB-231 and MCF10A cell lines in which CDKN1C is expressed at different levels. We detected an abundant H3K27me3 in a region approximately 300 bp downstream of the TSS in SK-BR-3 cells that express the lowest level of CDKN1C (Figure 2B). This was also observed to a lesser extend in BT-474 cells that express a modest level of CDKN1C, and at low rates in MDA-MB-231 and MCF10A cells that express abundant CDKN1C. Consistent with the enrichment of H3K27me3, we also detected a strong binding of H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2 to the CDKN1C promoter in SK-BR-3, to a lesser extend in BT-474 cells but not in MDA-MB-231 and MCF10A cells. Thus, levels of enrichment of EZH2 and H3K27me3 correlate very well (inversely) with the levels of CDKN1C expression across these diverse cell lines. This finding is consistent with the notion that EZH2 and the associated H3K27me3 enrichment are correlated with gene repression in cancer cells, and the majority of H3K27me3 is detected in the region downstream of the TSS [24], [25], [26], [27].

Figure 2

Histone modifications at CDKN1C locus in breast cancer cells.

In addition, abundant H3K4me3 near the TSS was detected in all the four cell lines, irrespective of the levels of CDKN1C expression (Figure 2B). This suggests that CDKN1C is marked by both repressive and activating histone marks in SK-BR-3 and BT-474 cells; a bivalent chromatin state that is generally associated with gene repression [28], [29]. Higher abundance of acetylated H3 (H3K9/14ac) was detected in CDKN1C-expressing MCF10A, MDA-MB-231 and BT-474 cells but was less detectable in SK-BR3 cells that express a lowest level of CDKN1C, indicating a positive correlation of H3K9/14ac with CDKN1C expression in these cells. We also detected the presence of another repressive mark H3K9me2 in BT-474 cells but not in other three cell lines (Figure 2B). Taken together, these results indicate that the chromatin states reflecting the abundance of repressive H3K27me3; activating H3K4me3 and H3K9/14ac, as well as their combinatorial effects, correlate well with the levels of CDKN1C expression in these cells. Other repressive histone modifications such as H4K20me3 and H3K9me3 were not detected at the CDKN1C locus (data not shown).

To further determine the association of H3K27me3 with the level of CDKN1C expression in human breast tumors, we took the advantage of an independent microarray dataset of human breast tumors stained with H3K27me3 in Oncomine microarray database (www.oncomine.org). Figure 2C shows that breast tumors stained positive for H3K27me3 display a consistent downregulation of CDKN1C compared with those negative for H3K27me3. Of important note, genes exhibiting the similar expression patterns to CDKN1C include KRT17, KRT5 and LAMB3 that have been validated to be EZH2 target in our previous study [23]. Thus, the data from both clinical breast tumor samples and cancer cell lines all support that CDKN1C downregulation in breast cancer is associated with a higher level of H3K27me3.

Robust activation of CDKN1C expression by a combination treatment with DZNep and TSA

The different chromatin configurations at CDKN1C in SK-BR-3, BT-474 and MDA-MB-231 cells may predict differential response of CDKN1C expression to various epigenetic drug treatments. We next treated these breast cancer cell lines with DZNep, TSA, or Aza alone or in various combinations and performed quantitative RT-PCR to assess the changes of CDKN1C expression upon these treatments. To determine the specificity of the gene response, other CDKI family members were also included for the expression analysis. The results indicate that the combination of DZNep with TSA resulted in a robust induction of CDKN1C expression in SK-BR-3 cells, whereas the single drug treatment or other drug combinations, such as DZNep/Aza or TSA/Aza, did not give rise to such a strong induction (Figure 3A). As a marked contrast to CDKN1C, other CDKI family members did not respond to a similar extent, revealing the sensitivity of CDKN1C to this combination treatment (Figure 3A). Moreover, in BT-474 cells that display a lower abundance of H3K27me3, DZNep/TSA treatment only induced a 12-fold induction of CDKN1C, as opposed to a 70-fold induction in SKBR-3 cells. This response was much weaker in MDA-MB-231 cells and MCF10A cells that exhibit low levels of H3K27me3 in CDKN1C (Figure 3A). Taken together with the previous results, the data further support the conclusion that H3K27me3 level in CDKN1C is closely associated with its expression inversely. It also suggests that inhibition of H3K27me3 by DZNep alone is insufficient but requires TSA treatment for a full reactivation of CDKN1C. Lack of response of other CDKN family members to DZNep/TSA indicates the lack of similar chromatin state in these genes. Indeed, we found that other CDKIs, such as CDKN1D, were not marked by H3K27me3 in SK-BR-3 cells (data not shown). Finally, we confirmed the induction of CDKN1C protein expression in a similar manner by western blot (Figure 3B).

Figure 3

Changes of CDKN1C expression in response to DZNep, TSA, Aza and their combinations.

CDKN1C is an imprinting gene, whose expression is also negatively regulated by an imprinted control region that contains a non-coding transcript DMR-LIT1[30]. To test the possibility that the induction of CDKN1C might arise from the downregulation of DMR-LIT1, we looked at the expression of LIT1 upon above drug treatment. The result shows that LIT1 expression is not changed upon DZNep/TSA treatment (Figure 3C), excluding the possibility that CDKN1C induction by DZNep/TSA is the result of LIT1 downregulation.

Combination treatment with DZNep and TSA synergistically reverses histone modifications

We next examined the bulk histone modifications in cells treated with DZNep, TSA or both. Cellular histone was isolated from cell extracts and subjected to Western blot analysis using antibodies against relevant histone modifications. As shown in Figure 3A, DZNep treatment alone or in combination with TSA caused a diminished H3K27me3 in SK-BR3 and BT-474 cells, as anticipiated from our previous report [23]. A striking observation was the dramatic and synergistic increase in H3K9/14 acetylation in cells treated with the DZNep/TSA combination compared to cells treated with DZNep or TSA single treatment (Figure 4A). Although a decrease in H3K4me3 was also observed in cells treated with DZNep alone, the combination treatment seemed to cause a reverse of this decrease, leading to a level of H3K4me3 comparable to the untreated cells. Thus, the combination of DZNep and TSA induced a reversal of histone modifications by inhibiting H3K27me3 while enhancing acetated H3. This combinatorial effect on histone modification suggests a more permissive chromatin state overall, consistent with the robust induction of CDKN1C expression.

Figure 4

Effects of DZNep/TSA combination on histone modifications.

We further performed ChIP analysis to determine the changes of chromatin following the above drug treatments. As expected, SK-BR-3 cells treated with DZNep/TSA showed an reduced EZH2 enrichment in CDKN1C, with a corresponding decrease in H3K27me3 (Figure 4B). Concomitantly, H3K9/14ac was enhanced after the combination treatment. Thus, taken together with the previous results from quantitative RT-PCR, we identified a strong correlation between the collective changes in histone modifications (H3K27me3 and H3K9/14 ac) and the expression levels of CDKN1C. This indicates that combination treatment with DZNep and TSA creates a permissive chromatin environment for CDKN1C expression through synergistically reversing associated chromatin marks.

To directly asses the role of EZH2 in CDKN1C expression, we used RNA interference to deplete the EZH2 expression. SK-BR-3 cells treated with small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting EZH2 displayed a marked decrease in EZH2 expression, and a corresponding decrease in bulk H3K27me3 (Figure 4C). Depletion of EZH2, albeit insufficient to induce CDKN1C expression, resulted in a marked accumulation of CDKN1C protein in the presence of TSA (Figure 4C). This result is consistent with the previous pharmacology data and further indicates that effective CDKN1C induction requires inhibition of both EZH2 and histone deaceylation. It directly supports the model that histone deacetylation and EZH2-mediated histone methylation cooperate to repress CDKN1C expression.

Addition of Aza to DZNep/TSA combination further increases CDKN1C expression in BT-474 cells

In BT-474 cells, the upstream region of CDKN1C promoter (M1) was detected to be hypermethylated compared to that in SK-BR-3 cells (Figure 1B). We next examined whether addition of Aza in these cells would further enhance the level of CDKN1C induction by DZNep/TSA. BT-474 and SK-BR-3 cells were thus treated with DZNep/TSA in the presence or absence of Aza for 72 h and the changes in CDKN1C expression were determined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Figure 5A shows the triple treatment in BT-474 cells induced a 27-fold induction of CDKN1C expression compared to a 12-fold induction by DZNep/TSA. By contrast, addition of Aza in SB-KR-3 cells did not further increase the level of CDKN1C which is already strongly induced by DZNep/TSA. However, MSP analysis revealed that the Aza treatment in BT-474 cells for up to 96 h did not in fact reduce the DNA methylation in the M1 region (Figure 5B), suggesting that the further enhanced induction of CDKN1C in BT-474 cells upon the triple combination treatment is not the result of DNA demethylation.

Figure 5

Addition of Aza to DZNep/TSA combination further enhances CDKN1C expression in BT-474 cells.

It has been recently reported that Aza can act independently of its ability to inhibit DNA methylation to reactivate gene expression by removing H3K9me2 [31]. Since CDKN1C is marked by H3K9me2 in BT-474 cells, we next examined if H3K9me2 in CDKN1C, together with other histone marks, have changed after the above treatments. The results show that H3K9me2 level was markedly reduced in cells treated with the three-drug combination, compared with cells treated with DZNep/TSA, while H3K27me3 levels remained the same (Figure 5C). Thus, the further increase in CDKN1C expression upon treatment with the triple drug combination in BT-474 cells might be due to additional inhibition of H3K9me2. This is consistent with the fact that Aza treatment did not further increase CDKN1C expression in SK-BR-3 in which CDKN1C is not marked by H3K9m2. Taken together, we conclude that histone modifications play a predominate role in epigenetic repression of CDKN1C in breast cancer cells.

EZH2-mediated CDKN1C repression predicts breast cancer clinical outcome

Given the involvement of EZH2 in CDKN1C repression, we took the advantage of Oncomine microarray database and asked whether their expression levels are reversely correlated in human cancer. The search results revealed that EZH2 is consistently upregulated in multiple human cancer types including breast cancer, while CDKN1C is downregulated in these tumors (Figure 6A). This data suggest that EZH2-mediated CDKN1C repression might operate widely in human cancers, indicating the potential broad application of pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 for reactivating CDKN1C for cancer treatment.

Figure 6

Levels of CDKN1C expression predict the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.

Enhanced EZH2 expression has been previously shown to correlate with poor prognosis of breast cancer [8], [9]. We next determined whether CDKN1C as an EZH2-repressed target is reversely associated with the disease outcome. To this end, we examined the publicly available microarray dataset from two breast cancer cohorts with annotated clinical outcome, Uppsala (~251 patients) and Stockholm (~159 patients) [32], [33]. The Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis of both disease free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in both data sets showed that EZH2 and CDKN1C are consistently associated with the disease outcome in a reverse manner (Table S1). Specifically, as shown in the Kaplan-Meier plots of Figure 6B, significant poorer outcome in disease free survival (DFS; P

0.004227 and P

0.005694) were observed between Stockholm patients with a higher EZH2 and a lower CDKN1C, respectively. This indicates that both EZH2 and its target gene CDKN1C can be used to predict breast cancer outcome. In comparison, no other CDKN family genes could significantly separate the patients by survival (data not shown), consistent with the hypothesis that these genes might not be targeted by EZH2 in breast cancer. Furthermore, we show that breast cancer expressing both higher EZH2 and lower CDKN1C show a much poorer disease-free survival rate (P

0.001046) compared to patients with lower EZH2 and higher CDKN1C (Figure 6C). Thus, the combination of both EZH2 and CDKN1C may be more predictive of breast cancer recurrence than either one alone. This result suggests that assessing both EZH2 and its target gene may be more accurate to measure the activity of EZH2 pathway. This data also has implications in patient stratification for potential clinical use of EZH2-inhibiting agents such as DZNep. We predict that breast cancer patients with higher EZH2 and lower CDKN1C might receive the greatest benefit from cancer therapeutic targeting of EZH2-mediated gene repression.

Discussion

Our findings suggest that Polycomb protein EZH2-mediated H3K27me3 might be the key chromatin mark associated with the transcriptional repression of CDKN1C in breast cancer cells. It also indicates that EZH2 functions through cooperation with histone deacetylation for effective repression of its target genes. Lack of dominate effect of DNA methylation, together with RT-PCR analysis, indicate that CDKN1C expression in breast cancer is maintained at low or basal levels rather than completely silenced. Indeed, CDKN1C can be only modestly induced by Aza but strongly induced by DZNep/TSA that targets both EZH2-mediated histone methylation and deacetylation. This finding indicates that DZNep/TSA might preferentially target genes whose repression is associated with H3K27me3 but not those completely silenced by DNA methylation. This is consistent with a recent study showing that EZH2 functions to maintain the low expression of target genes that lack DNA methylation but is not required for maintaining gene silencing predominantly caused by DNA methylation [34].

We show that CDKN1C carries both repressive (H3K27me3) and activating (H3K4me3) chromatin marks, revealing a “bivalent” chromatin state. Moreover, recent studies have shown that methylation of H3K4 is reversely associated with DNA methylation of gene promoters [35], [36], [37] and that DNMT only recognizes unmethylated H3K4 to induce DNA methylation [38]. Thus, the detection of a strong H3K4me3 in the CDKN1C promoter is consistent with the lack of DNA methylation in the vicinity of the CDKN1C promoter as we observed in breast cancer cells. A ‘bivalent’ chromatin mark (H3K27me3 and H3K4me3) has been originally described in embryonic stem (ES) cells that is generally associated with genes transcribed in low levels [28], [39]. Recent studies have also indicated its existence in differentiated cells [26], [29]. Many tumor suppressor genes carrying a bivalent chromatin mark in ES cells are subject to further DNA methylation for stable gene silencing in cancer cells [40], [41], [42]. It has been proposed that during this malignant process DNA methylation confers a concomitant loss of H3K4 methylation after a bivalent chromatin is converted to a monovalent state [17], [41], [43]. The retention of the bivalent domain without DNA methylation indicates that this epigenetic mechanism also exists in cancer cells, which might also contribute to the malignant transformation together with the well-characterized DNA methylation. This finding has obvious therapeutic implications. As described above, these bivalent genes that are lowly transcribed (not completely silenced) might be most susceptible to histone modifying compounds such as DZNep/TSA as illustrated in this study, but not to DNA demethylating agents. These genes might contain important tumor suppressors that have been overlooked historically. We therefore speculate that the above described epigenetic treatment might open a new avenue for cancer therapeutics that aim to target this aberrant epigenetic process that has been previously under-appreciated in cancer.

Our comprehensive epigenetic analysis of these observations highlights the emerging concept that multiple epigenetic mechanisms collaborate to repress gene expression in cancer cells. Furthermore, our results indicate that DNA methylation and EZH2-H3K27me3 might not be mechanistically linked as previously suggested [14]. In fact, we did not detect methylated DNA in EZH2-H2K27me3 enriched region in CDKN1C. Conversely, in the CDKN1C promoter region that appears to be methylated (such as in BT-474 cells), no EZH2-H3K27me3 was detected. This finding is consistent with the recent genomic scale analysis showing that H3K27me3-mediated gene silencing and DNA methylation target different set of genes [15], [17]. Despite the presence of both epigenetic events in the CDKN1C locus in BT-474 cells, EZH2-H3K27me3 appears to be the predominate one that is in synergy with histone deacetylation to repress CDKN1C expression. Targeting EZH2-H3K27me3 by DZNep would presumably synergize with HDAC inhibitors and/or Aza to maximally restore the tumor suppressor function of CDKN1C.

Finally, we show that the downregulation of CDKN1C by EZH2 in breast cancer is associated with a poor disease outcome. Mechanistically, this finding is consistent with the previous knowledge that overexpression of EZH2 correlates with a poor breast cancer prognosis. Moreover, a recent report shows that Polycomb repression signature genes can predict clinical outcome of multiple solid tumors [24]. These findings thus suggest the utility of EZH2 target genes as prognostic marks. We further show that the combination of EZH2 and CDKN1C gives a better prediction of disease outcome that achieved through either gene alone. This might suggest that measuring both EZH2 and its target gene activity as the readout might be more accurate in predicting the activity of this silencing pathway. Indeed, our data suggest that EZH2 alone is insufficient but requires other factors such as HDAC to assure a full functionally in repression of certain genes. Therapeutically, this information may provide significant values in patient stratification for potential clinical use of EZH2 inhibitors as anti-cancer agents. Such agents may be particularly useful for patients with breast cancer harboring EZH2-mediaed repression of CDKN1C. Furthermore, we show that upregulation of EZH2 and the corresponding downregulation of CDKN1C occur in multiple human cancers. This may suggest that the pharmacological approach we have demonstrated for inhibiting EZH2 and reactivating CDKN1C might have broad application for cancer therapy.

Methods

Cells and drug treatment

Cell lines used in this study were all obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Cells were maintained in appropriate medium conditions until harvested. For drug treatment, cells were treated with 5 µM DZNep (obtained from National Cancer Institute of USA) or 5 µM 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-AzaC; Sigma) for 72 h, and trichostatin A (TSA; Sigma) at 100 nM for 24 h. For 5-AzaC treatment, the medium was replaced with freshly added 5-AzaC for every 24 h. For co-treatment of cells with 5-DZNep and TSA, DZNep was added for 48 h, and then treated with TSA for additional 24 h.

RNA interference

The siRNA targeting EZH2 and non-targeting control were purchase from from 1st BASE Pte Led (Singapore) as following sequence: 5′-GACUCUGAAUGCAGUUGCU -3′. SK-BR-3 cells were transfected with 100 nM final concentration of siRNA duplexes using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Histone extraction and immunoblot analysis

Whole cell extract was prepared as previously [23]. Histone proteins were acid extracted following Upstate protocol. Western blots were probed with the following antibodies: anti-H3K27me3 (07-449), anti-H3K9me3 (07-442), anti-H3K9/K14ac (06-599), anti-H3K4me3 (07-473), and anti-EZH2 (AC22) were purchased from Upstate. Anti-H3 (3H1) was from Cell Signaling and anti-EZH2 and anti-p57 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

Quantitative real-time PCR and RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from cell lines using Trizol (Invitrogen) and purified with the RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription was performed using an RNA Amplification kit (Ambion). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on a PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) using TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystems). Samples were normalized to the levels of GAPDH mRNA. For PCR 100 ng of cDNA was used and the primer sequences are shown in Table S2.

DNA methylation analysis

The CpG island DNA methylation status was determined by PCR analysis after bisulfited modification (EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit, Zymo Research,) and followed by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 2.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays

ChIP assay was performed as previously with a modified protocol that uses QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) to purify precipitated DNA. The immunoprecipitapted DNA was quantitated by real-time quantitative PCR using PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Primer sets are designed to amplify approximately 200 bp around the indicated region. The following antibodies were used in this study: anti-H3K27me3 (Upstate), anti-H3K9me3 (Abcam), anti-EZH2 (Upstate, anti-H3K9/K4ac (Upstate), anti-Histone H3(Abcam). Quantification of ChIP results was performed relative to the input amount. The sequences of the PCR primers are shown in Table S2.

Data set and survival analysis

The breast cancer data set from Uppsala and Stockholm cohorts with relevant clinical information have been described previously [32], [33]. The expression of probes of each CDKN gene was averaged and transformed to z-score. The positive z-score was treated as higher expression and the negative z-score was treated lower expression. Using the survival event status and time information, we computed the survival association of expression status (high/low expression) using Cox-Proportional Hazards model implementation (coxph) available in R-library “survival”. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for the analysis of clinical outcome. For the combination of EZH2 and CDKN1C, the average expressions of both EZH2 and CDKN1C genes were separately transformed to z-score. The tumors with opposite signs of z-scores of the EZH2 and CDKN1C were included in the analysis and the tumors with same signs of z-scores were left out of the analysis. Tumors in which EZH2 up or positive EZH2 z-score and CDKN1C down or negative CDKN1C z-score were classified as class with label “0”. Tumors in which EZH2 down or negative EZH2 z-score and CDKN1C up or positive CDKN1C z-score were classified as class with label “1”. Similar survival analysis was carried out using cox proportional hazards model fitting and Kaplan-Meier plots.

Supporting Information

Table S1

(0.02 MB XLS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(24K, xls)}

Table S2

(0.03 MB XLS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(27K, xls)}

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A* Star) of Singapore.(http://www.a-star.edu.sg). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Bachman KE, Park BH, Rhee I, Rajagopalan H, Herman JG, et al. Histone modifications and silencing prior to DNA methylation of a tumor suppressor gene. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:89–95. [PubMed]

2. Karnik SK, Hughes CM, Gu X, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, McLean GW, et al. Menin regulates pancreatic islet growth by promoting histone methylation and expression of genes encoding p27Kip1 and p18INK4c. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14659–14664. [PubMed]

3. Bracken AP, Kleine-Kohlbrecher D, Dietrich N, Pasini D, Gargiulo G, et al. The Polycomb group proteins bind throughout the INK4A-ARF locus and are disassociated in senescent cells. Genes Dev. 2007;21:525–530. [PubMed]

4. Kotake Y, Cao R, Viatour P, Sage J, Zhang Y, et al. pRB family proteins are required for H3K27 trimethylation and Polycomb repression complexes binding to and silencing p16INK4alpha tumor suppressor gene. Genes Dev. 2007;21:49–54. [PubMed]

5. Jones PA, Taylor SM. Cellular differentiation, cytidine analogs and DNA methylation. Cell. 1980;20:85–93. [PubMed]

6. Marks PA, Richon VM, Miller T, Kelly WK. Histone deacetylase inhibitors. Adv Cancer Res. 2004;91:137–168. [PubMed]

7. Cameron EE, Bachman KE, Myohanen S, Herman JG, Baylin SB. Synergy of demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in the re-expression of genes silenced in cancer. Nat Genet. 1999;21:103–107. [PubMed]

8. Kleer CG, Cao Q, Varambally S, Shen R, Ota I, et al. EZH2 is a marker of aggressive breast cancer and promotes neoplastic transformation of breast epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:11606–11611. [PubMed]

9. Bachmann IM, Halvorsen OJ, Collett K, Stefansson IM, Straume O, et al. EZH2 expression is associated with high proliferation rate and aggressive tumor subgroups in cutaneous melanoma and cancers of the endometrium, prostate, and breast. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:268–273. [PubMed]

10. Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science. 2002;298:1039–1043. [PubMed]

11. Kirmizis A, Bartley SM, Kuzmichev A, Margueron R, Reinberg D, et al. Silencing of human polycomb target genes is associated with methylation of histone H3 Lys 27. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1592–1605. [PubMed]

12. Kuzmichev A, Nishioka K, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2893–2905. [PubMed]

13. Varambally S, Dhanasekaran SM, Zhou M, Barrette TR, Kumar-Sinha C, et al. The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature. 2002;419:624–629. [PubMed]

14. Vire E, Brenner C, Deplus R, Blanchon L, Fraga M, et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature. 2006;439:871–874. [PubMed]

15. Kondo Y, Shen L, Cheng AS, Ahmed S, Boumber Y, et al. Gene silencing in cancer by histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation independent of promoter DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2008;40:741–750. [PubMed]

16. Jiang X, Tan J, Li J, Kivimae S, Yang X, et al. DACT3 is an epigenetic regulator of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer and is a therapeutic target of histone modifications. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:529–541. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

17. Gal-Yam EN, Egger G, Iniguez L, Holster H, Einarsson S, et al. Frequent switching of Polycomb repressive marks and DNA hypermethylation in the PC3 prostate cancer cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:12979–12984. [PubMed]

18. McGarvey KM, Van Neste L, Cope L, Ohm JE, Herman JG, et al. Defining a chromatin pattern that characterizes DNA-hypermethylated genes in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5753–5759. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

19. Egger G, Aparicio AM, Escobar SG, Jones PA. Inhibition of histone deacetylation does not block resilencing of p16 after 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine treatment. Cancer Res. 2007;67:346–353. [PubMed]

20. McGarvey KM, Fahrner JA, Greene E, Martens J, Jenuwein T, et al. Silenced tumor suppressor genes reactivated by DNA demethylation do not return to a fully euchromatic chromatin state. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3541–3549. [PubMed]

21. Pateras IS, Apostolopoulou K, Koutsami M, Evangelou K, Tsantoulis P, et al. Downregulation of the KIP family members p27(KIP1) and p57(KIP2) by SKP2 and the role of methylation in p57(KIP2) inactivation in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2546–2556. [PubMed]

22. Li Y, Nagai H, Ohno T, Yuge M, Hatano S, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation of p57(KIP2) gene in the promoter region in lymphoid malignancies of B-cell phenotype. Blood. 2002;100:2572–2577. [PubMed]

23. Tan J, Yang X, Zhuang L, Jiang X, Chen W, et al. Pharmacologic disruption of Polycomb-repressive complex 2-mediated gene repression selectively induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1050–1063. [PubMed]

24. Yu J, Rhodes DR, Tomlins SA, Cao X, Chen G, et al. A polycomb repression signature in metastatic prostate cancer predicts cancer outcome. Cancer Res. 2007;67:10657–10663. [PubMed]

25. Zhao X, Han X, Chew J, Liu J, Chiu K, et al. Whole-Genome Mapping of Histone H3 Lys4 and 27 Trimethylations Reveals Distinct Genomic Compartments in Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;3:286. [PubMed]

26. Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007;129:823–837. [PubMed]

27. Pan G, Tian S, Nie J, Yang C, Ruotti V, et al. Whole-Genome Analysis of Histone H3 Lysine 4 and Lysine 27 Methylation in Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:299. [PubMed]

28. Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2006;125:315–326. [PubMed]

29. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature. 2007;448:553–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

30. Soejima H, Nakagawachi T, Zhao W, Higashimoto K, Urano T, et al. Silencing of imprinted CDKN1C gene expression is associated with loss of CpG and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation at DMR-LIT1 in esophageal cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23:4380–4388. [PubMed]

31. Wozniak RJ, Klimecki WT, Lau SS, Feinstein Y, Futscher BW. 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine-mediated reductions in G9A histone methyltransferase and histone H3 K9 di-methylation levels are linked to tumor suppressor gene reactivation. Oncogene. 2007;26:77–90. [PubMed]

32. Miller LD, Smeds J, George J, Vega VB, Vergara L, et al. An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:13550–13555. [PubMed]

33. Hall P, Ploner A, Bjohle J, Huang F, Lin CY, et al. Hormone-replacement therapy influences gene expression profiles and is associated with breast-cancer prognosis: a cohort study. BMC Med. 2006;4:16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

34. McGarvey KM, Greene E, Fahrner JA, Jenuwein T, Baylin SB. DNA methylation and complete transcriptional silencing of cancer genes persist after depletion of EZH2. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5097–5102. [PubMed]

35. Weber M, Hellmann I, Stadler MB, Ramos L, Paabo S, et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2007;39:457–466. [PubMed]

36. Kondo Y, Shen L, Issa JP. Critical role of histone methylation in tumor suppressor gene silencing in colorectal cancer. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:206–215. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

37. Nguyen CT, Weisenberger DJ, Velicescu M, Gonzales FA, Lin JC, et al. Histone H3-lysine 9 methylation is associated with aberrant gene silencing in cancer cells and is rapidly reversed by 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6456–6461. [PubMed]

38. Ooi SK, Qiu C, Bernstein E, Li K, Jia D, et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature. 2007;448:714–717. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

39. Azuara V, Perry P, Sauer S, Spivakov M, Jorgensen HF, et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:532–538. [PubMed]

40. Widschwendter M, Fiegl H, Egle D, Mueller-Holzner E, Spizzo G, et al. Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer. Nat Genet. 2007;39:157–158. [PubMed]

41. Ohm JE, McGarvey KM, Yu X, Cheng L, Schuebel KE, et al. A stem cell-like chromatin pattern may predispose tumor suppressor genes to DNA hypermethylation and heritable silencing. Nat Genet. 2007;39:237–242. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

42. Schlesinger Y, Straussman R, Keshet I, Farkash S, Hecht M, et al. Polycomb-mediated methylation on Lys27 of histone H3 pre-marks genes for de novo methylation in cancer. Nat Genet. 2007;39:232–236. [PubMed]

43. Ohm JE, Baylin SB. Stem cell chromatin patterns: an instructive mechanism for DNA hypermethylation? Cell Cycle. 2007;6:1040–1043. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of
Public Library of Science