Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Bioorg Med Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 February 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2659416

Evaluation of α,β-unsaturated Ketone-based Probes for Papain-Family Cysteine Proteases


The field of activity based proteomics makes use of small molecule active site probes to monitor distinct subsets of enzymatic proteins. While a number of reactive functional groups have been applied to activity based probes (ABPs) that target diverse families of proteases, there remains a continual need for further evaluation of new probe scaffolds and reactive functional groups for use in ABPs. In this study we evaluate the utility of the α, β-unsaturated ketone reactive group for use in ABPs targeting the papain family of cysteine proteases. We find that this reactive group shows highly selective labeling of cysteine cathepsins in both intact cells and total cell extracts. We observed a variable degree of background labeling that depended on the type of tag and liker used in the probe synthesis. The relative ease of synthesis of this class of compounds provides the potential for further derivatization to generate new families of cysteine protease ABPs with unique specificity and labeling properties.


Most enzymes are regulated by a complex set of controls that prevent them from causing damage to a cell as the result of their uncontrolled activation. Proteases are no exception, as virtually all members of this enzyme class are regulated by initial activation of a zymogen form and then subsequent temporal control by endogenous inhibitors. Thus, methods such as transcript array profiling and standard proteomics are unable to provide information about the dynamic, post-translational regulatory mechanisms used to control the networks of proteolytic events involved in basic cell physiology or disease pathology. Therefore, it is necessary to develop tools that allow the activity levels of specific protease targets to be monitored within the context of a complex biological environment.

Activity based probes (ABPs) are small molecules that form activity dependant covalent bonds to a target enzyme.15 These probes contain three main elements: 1) a reactive functional group that facilitates the formation of the covalent bond with the active site catalytic residue of a target 2) a linker that can be used to control the specificity of binding interactions between the probe and target enzyme and 3) a tagging group that allows probe labeled targets to be isolated, biochemically characterized or imaged. While the past 10 years has seen a significant growth in both the diversity of ABPs and the types of enzymes that can be targeted by these probes,6,7 there remains a need to develop new classes of ABPs in order to continue to expand the repertoire of proteins that can be studied using chemical proteomic methods. In particular, new reactive “warheads” need to be evaluated for use with general probe scaffolds. These reactive functional groups often control the broad selectivity of the ABP and also have a dramatic impact on the overall cross-reactivity resulting from non-specific interactions with abundant background proteins.

While a number of effective reactive functional groups have been employed in ABPs that target cysteine proteases (for reviews see ref 2,3,7,8), there still remains room for improvement both at the level of selectivity and also at the level of ease of synthesis. The peptide vinyl sulfones have found widespread use in probes that target papain family cysteine proteases911 as well as ubiquitin specific proteases1214 and the proteasome.15,16 However, this reactive functional group is not effective for all classes of cysteine proteases. The highly related Michael acceptor, the α,β-unsaturated ketone has been extensively used in the development of inhibitors of specific classes of cysteine proteases.17, 18 Interestingly, while there is ample evidence to suggest that the α,β-unsaturated ketone has different specificity properties relative to the vinyl sulfone, this class of warhead has only been used in a single class of highly specific activity based probes that target the de-ubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs).19 This class of probe derives the majority of its selectivity from the large 76 aminoacid ubiquitin protein that is attached to the reactive warhead group. Thus, it remains unclear how valuable the α,β-unsaturated ketone is as a more general warhead for use with short peptide based ABPs.

In this study we synthesized a number of simple peptide α,β-unsaturated ketones and tested them as general activity based probes of the cysteine protease family. We find that biotinylated and fluorescent α,β-unsaturated ketones show very potent labeling of cathepsins with low overall background labeling in total tissue and cell extracts, respectively. Compared with the previously validated acyloxymethyl ketone (AOMK) based probes, the α,β-unsaturated ketone showed enhanced labeling in tissue and cell extracts and similar levels of labeling in intact cells. Importantly, the α,β-unsaturated ketones were several orders of magnitude more potent towards the recombinant cathepsins B and L compared to a related AOMK, suggesting that they may provide higher levels of signal for in vivo imaging using the methods outlined for the AOMK-based ABPs.20 Furthermore the α,β-unsaturated ketones can be readily synthesized from the corresponding peptide Weinreb amides and can therefore be used to make diverse peptide sequences for evaluations of new classes of specific ABPs.

Results and discussions

Evaluation of the α,β unsaturated ketone as a warhead for use in ABPs

We initially set out to evaluate the utility of the α,β-unsaturated ketone (αβUK) as a reactive group for use in ABPs that target cysteine proteases. We identified a related αβUK in a small molecule screen for compounds that block host cell invasion by the obligate intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii.21 Based on the structure of this hit we designed and synthesized a series of analogs that contain a central P2 phenylalanine and P1 alanine peptide attached to the α, β-unsaturated methyl ketone. The simplest analog, yzm09 (5a) contains a Cbz cap at its N-terminus. This capping group is replaced by biotin (yzm13, 5c) or a fluorescent tag (yzm24, 5d) to yield the first generation ABPs. The synthesis of yzm09 was accomplished by preparation of the dipeptide Z-Phe-Ala (2a) followed by conversion to the corresponding Weinreb amide (3a); the reduction of the Weinreb amide and further treatment with the Wittig reagent of 1-triphenyl-phosphoranylidene-2-propanone afforded a mixture of the desired product with trans-conformation and its cis isomer (scheme 1). The ratio of trans/cis was determined to be approximately 4/1 based on HPLC analysis with the ratio being highly dependant on the steric properties of the P1 sidechain as has been shown for peptide vinyl sulfones.22 The desired compound with trans-conformation (yzm09, 5a) was separated by HPLC in reasonable yield (36 % for 5 steps). The labeled analogs of yzm09 were prepared from the Boc-protected compound 5b. After deprotection of the Boc-group, biotin or BODIPY-TMR-X were used to generate the corresponding labeled probes (yzm13 and yzm24, respectively in scheme 2).

Scheme 1
Synthetic scheme for yzm09 and 5b
Scheme 2
Synthetic scheme for yzm13 and yzm24

Evalutation of the biotinylated ABP yzm13

Having successfully synthesized two labeled analogs of the parent lead compound yzm09, we began testing the biotin probe yzm13 for labeling of target proteases in complex proteomes. We initially used yzm13 in crude mouse tissue extracts derived from liver, spleen, heart, kidney, ovary, and uterus. Total protein extracts at pH 5.5 were pre-incubated with DMSO vehicle or the unlabeled parent compound yzm09 followed by addition of the biotin probe yzm13 at a range of probe concentrations. Labeled proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by detection using HRP-coupled streptavidin (Fig. 1). These initial labeling results confirmed that the biotin probe yzm13 strongly labeled one predominant protein just above the 30 kDa molecular weight marker. The labeling of this predominant protein was completely blocked by pre-treatment of the samples with 10 μM concentrations of yzm09 suggesting that it was the only selectively labeled protein in the extract. While a number of higher molecular weight species were observed at high concentrations of the probe, overall yzm13 showed highly specific labeling of a single target that could be observed at probe concentrations as low as 10 nM. Thus the αβUK is a potentially valuable warhead for use in ABPs as it shows effective labeling at very low concentrations of the probe.

Figure 1
Labeling of mouse tissue lysates with the biotin-labeled probe yzm13. Total crude extracts (pH 5.5) from the indicated mouse tissues were normalized for total protein and labeled by addition of yzm13 at the final concentrations indicated. In some samples ...

We next wanted to identify the predominant labeled protease observed with yzm13 in mouse tissue extracts. We therefore performed an affinity purification experiment in which mouse liver lysates with or without the pretreatment of 10 μM of yzm09 were labeled with 1.0 μM of yzm13. After enrichment of biotin labeled proteins on immobilized avidin, both samples were processed by “on bead” trypsin digestion to release peptides for subsequent analysis by LC-MS/MS.23 Analysis of all isolated peptides confirmed the presence of cathepsin B (Cat B) as well as several background proteins including endogenously biotinylated proteins such as propionyl-coenzyme A carboxylase and abundantly expressed proteins such as hemoglobin and transferases. Importantly, of all the nine proteins identified, only cathepsin B showed a significant decrease in the number of peptides identified in the sample that had been pre-treated with yzm09 to block specific labeling of targets. This result demonstrated that the only specific target of yzm13 in total liver extracts is Cat B, consistent with the labeling observed by SDS-PAGE analysis.

Labeling complex proteomes with the fluorescent ABP yzm24

To confirm that the αβUK could also be used with fluorescent detection, we tested the ability of yzm24 to label mouse tissue lysate and also cells lysate. The fluorescently labeled yzm24 strongly labeled Cat B, as indicated by the intense band just above 28 kDa in mouse spleen lysate that was completely blocked by pre-treatment with yzm09 (Fig. 2A). Again, we observed highly specific labeling of Cat B with very low overall background when the probe was used at 500 nM final concentrations, consistent with the observed labeling pattern of the biotin labeled probe yzm13. When yzm24 was used to label total extracts from the human breast cancer cell lysate, again a band of labeled protein corresponding to cathepsin B was observed (Fig. 2B). While these cell extracts showed a significantly higher level of background labeling compared to the spleen lysates, only labeling of the specific cathepsin B band was abolished by pre-treatment of the sample with yzm09. Thus, the fluorescently labeled yzm24 shows similar specific labeling patterns as the biotin probe yzm13. Both reagents are highly specific labels of cathepsin B and can be used as sub-micromolar concentrations.

Figure 2
Labeling of total cell extracts with the fluorescently labeled probe yzm24. A) Crude protein extracts from mouse spleen tissue (pH 5.5) was labeled by addition of yzm24 at the indicated final concentration followed by SDS-PAGe and analysis of labeled ...

Labeling in intact cells with the cell permeable fluorescent probe yzm24

As a final test of the αβUK probe we wanted to test the utility of this probe class for labeling of endogenous cysteine proteases in intact cells. Since the biotin labeled probe yzm13 was unlikely to penetrate the cells and gain access to intra-lysosomal pools of cathepsins we decided to focus our attention on the BODIPY labeled analog yzm24. Our group has previously shown that the BODIPY labeled version of the AOMK probe GB111 is useful for intact cell labeling experiments24. Thus, we compared the labeling of intact mouse fibroblast cells by the αβUK containing fluorescent probe yzm24 to labeling by the related AOMK probe GB111. In wild type fibroblasts we observed the previously reported characteristic labeling pattern of GB111 that includes a single form of cathpsin B (32kD) and the heavy and light chain forms of cathepin L (28 and 22 kDa).24 We observed a highly similar labeling pattern for yzm24 but with a higher level of background labeling (Fig. 3A). To confirm that yzm24 was labeling both cathepsin B and cathepsin L as observed for GB111, we labeled extracts for mouse fibroblasts derived from the cathepsin B and cathepsin L knock out mice (Cat B −/− and Cat L −/−, respectively; Fig. 3B,C). As expected, the 32kDa labeled protein disappeared in Cat B −/− cells and the lower two bands disappeared in Cat L −/− cells, thus confirming that yzm24 efficiently labels both cathepsin B and cathepsin L in intact cells. This result was initially somewhat surprising considering the overall highly specific labeling of cathepsin B in both cell and tissue extracts. However, we and others have found that cathepsin L activity is lost once cells or tissues are lysed.25 This may be due to the presence of endogenous inhibitors that are released upon lysis that quickly inactive the mature active forms of cathepsin L or it may be due to a relatively poor stability of cathepsin L in conditions used in our buffers.

Figure 3
Labeling of intact cells with GB111 and yzm24. A. Intact wildtype, cathepsin B deficient (Cat B −/−) or cathepsin L deficient (Cat L −/−) fibroblasts were labeled by addition of the fluorescent probes GB111 and yzm24 to ...

As a final test of the αβUK containing probes we wanted to confirm our findings that these compounds are efficient labels of both cathepsin B and L. We therefore measured the overall kinetic rate constants of inhibition of the parent yzm09 for the recombinant forms of cathepsin B and cathepin L. The results confirm that yzm09 shows fast, irreversible inhibition of both cathepsin B and L (Table 1). The kass of yzm09 for Cat B and Cat L are 36,680 and 1,634,400 M−1s−1, respectively indicating that it is more than 10-fold more potent than the selective probe GB111.24 Thus, these results suggest that the increased potency of the αβUK containing inhibitors relative to the AOMK containing probes may be due to the overall increased reactivity of this class of warhead.

Table 1
Inhibition rate constants of yzm09 for human cathepsin B and cathepsin L.


Herein, we described the evaluation of the α,β-unsaturated ketone (αβUK) as a warhead for use in activity based probes for papain-family cysteine proteases. We demonstrate that this class of reactive functional group allows rapid synthesis of ABPs that show excellent labeling properties in tissues and cell extracts as well as in intact cells. While the improved potency of this class of compounds towards the target cathepsins relative to previously reported AOMK-based probes may be beneficial in that it allows the use of lower probe concentrations, it comes with the price of potentially higher levels of background labeling. Thus further studies may be required to determine if alternate peptide scaffolds can be used to enhance selectivity of the αβUK containing probes. Regardless we believe that this class of compound will find use for development of ABPs for diverse cysteine protease families, especially for those targets that are not efficiently labeled by currently used warheads such as the AOMK and vinyl sulfone. We are currently evaluating the properties of this probe class in vivo to determine if they represent useful tools for in vivo imaging studies.



All chemicals and resin were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. All water sensitive reactions were conducted in anhydrous solvents under positive pressure of argon. Reactions were analyzed by LC/MS with an API 150EX single quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems). Reverse phase HPLC was used with an ÅKTA explorer 100 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with C18 columns. High-resolution MS analyses were performed by the Stanford Proteomics and Integrative Research Facility with an Autoflex MALDA TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker). Fluorescent gels and plates were scanned with a Typhoon 9400 flatbed laser scanner (GE healthcare).


Cbz-FA-ketone (yzm09) and Boc-FA-ketone (5b). Z-Phe (299 mg, 1 mmol) and NHS (115 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in 20 ml of chloroform, and DCC (230 mg, 1.1 mmol) was added to the above solution with stirring at room temperature. After 1 h the formed solid was filtered off and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was used in the next reaction without further purification.

L-Alanine (89 mg, 1 mmol) and NaHCO3 (168 mg, 2 mmol) were dissolved in 20 ml of water with stirring. Next, a solution of crude product obtained above (dissolved in 40 mL acetone) was added. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. Subsequently, 30 mL of water was added and the precipitate was removed by filtration. The filtrate was acidified to a pH of ~3, resulting in precipitation of the product. The solid was obtained by filtration, washed with water and dried in vacuo (284 mg; 77% yield). The crude product was used without further purification.

185 mg of the crude material obtained in the previous step, N,O-dimethyl-hydroxylamine hydrochloride (47 mg, 0.5 mmol), and HBTU (190 mg, 0.5 mmol) were dissolved in 5 mL of anhydrous DMF. Next, 194 μL of DIEA was added. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1h, after which the solvent was concentrated under reduced pressure. 100 mL of ethyl acetate was added and the organic phase was washed with dilute acid (3 × 40 mL) and brine (1 × 40 mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure. The Weinreb amide 3a was purified by flash column chromatography (17–50% ethyl acetete in hexanes) and obtained as a white solid (162 mg, 78%).

To a solution of Weinreb amide 3a (162 mg) in 10 mL of anhydrous THF, 34 mg of LiAlH4 was added at 0 °C. After half an hour, 20 mL of 5% KHSO4 and 50 mL of ethyl acetate were added. The organic layer was washed with KHSO4 (2 × 20 mL), brine, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting aldehyde was obtained as a white solid.

To the solution of aldehyde (dried by coevaporation with toluene) in 15 mL DCM, 1-triphenyl-phosphoranylidene-2-propanone (160 mg) was added and stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was concentrated and the resulting pale yellowish solid was purified by HPLC. 92 mg of yzm09 was obtained (35.8 % overall yield, based on Z-Phe-OH). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.16 (d, 3H, CH–CH3), 2.194 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.97–3.02 and 3.10–3.15 (m, 2H, –CH–CH2–Ph), 4.33–4.35 (m, 1H, –CH–CH2–Ph), 4.61–4.64 (m, 1H, CH–CH3), 5.08 (s, 2H, –O–CH2–Ph), 5.86–5.90 (d, 1H, –CH–CH=), 6.41–6.46 (d, 1H, =CH–CO–), and 7.18–7.34 (m, 10H, aromatic). MS (EI): Calculated: (394.2); found: [M+H]+ (395.2).

A similar procedure was used to afford the compound 5b (overall yield = 24.3 %, based on Boc-Phe-OH). MS (EI): Calculated: (360.2); found: [M+H]+ (361.2).

Biotin-FA-ketone (yzm13) and BODIPY-TMRX-FA-Ketone (yzm24)

100 mg of compound 5b was dissolved in 6 mL of 4 M HCl in dioxane, the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 hours. The organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The obtained viscous liquid was coevaporated with toluene three times then dissolved in 10 mL of acetone and kept in the − 20 °C refrigerator.

Compound yzm13 and yzm24 were obtained by coupling the corresponding biotin or BODIPY NHS activated ester with a 2–3 fold excess of compound 6 (Scheme 2) in acetone with the assistance of 2 equiv. of DIEA (with respect to the amine compound). They were obtained in 90% yield after purification by HPLC. High resolution mass spectrometer (HRMS) data: [M+H]+ Calculated for yzm13, C36H56N5O9S+, 734.38; found 734.3797. Calculated for yzm24, C42H51BF2N5O5+, 754.40; found 754.3955.

Preparation of mouse tissue homogenates and protein labeling

Mouse tissue homogenates23 (5 mg total protein) were incubated in sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.5) with yzm13 (0.1 μM final concentration) in the presence of DTT (2 mM final concentration). Labeling was carried out for 1h at room temperature. Samples were separated by SDS PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (BioRad, USA). The membrane was blocked in casein (5% solution in PBS) and incubated with streptavidin-HRP (dilution 1:3500, Sigma, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Biotinylated proteins were visualized using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce, USA).

Affinity enrichment and elution of labeled proteins

After protein labeling, free probe was removed by a PD-10 gel filtration column (Amersham, USA) and sample was eluted in PBS buffer (pH 7.4). Streptavidin beads (Pierce, USA) were washed with PBS buffer and added to the PD10 eluate. The sample was incubated at room temperature with shaking for one hour. Streptavidin beads were separated from the unbound fraction by centrifugation. The supernatant was discarded and the beads were sequentially washed with a series of PBS buffers containing 0.05% SDS, 1M NaCl and 10% EtOH. Finally, the beads were washed with 100 mM ammonium hydrogen carbonate. Washing was performed three times with each buffer solution.

Sample preparation for LC-MS/MS analysis

For “on bead” digestion, streptavidin beads with bound proteins were resuspended in 100 μl of denaturing buffer (50 mM sodium hydrogen carbonate, 6 M urea). Bound proteins were reduced in the presence of 10 mM DTT for 1 h. Samples were alkylated by addition of 200 mM iodoacetamide (20 μL) and incubated for 1h in the dark. Unreacted iodoacetamide was neutralized by addition of 200 mM DTT (20 μL). The urea concentration was reduced by addition of dH2O (800 μL). Samples were incubated with trypsin overnight at 37ºC and purified on a Vivapure C18 spin column according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sartorius, Germany).

LC-MS/MS and database search

Samples were analyzed on a LCQ DecaXP Plus ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, USA) coupled to a nanoLC liquid chromatography unit (Eksigent, USA). Peptides were separated on a BioBasic Picofrit C18 capillary column (New Objective, USA). Elution was performed with acetonitrile gradient from 0–50% in the 0.1% solution of formic acid over 40 min with overall flowrate of 350 nL/min. The three most intense base peaks in each scan were analyzed by MS/MS. Dynamic exclusion was set at a repeat count of 2 with exclusion duration of 2 min. Database searches were performed using the mouse NCBI protein database using the Sequest algorithm (Thermo Fisher, USA). Peptides with XCorr values over 1.5 (+1 charge), 2 (+2 charge) and 2.5 (+3 charge) and deltaCn values over 0.1 were considered for further evaluation. Protein and peptide hits were statistically reevaluated by Scaffold (Proteome Software, USA). Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95% probability as specified by the Peptide Prophet algorithm. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 99.0% probability and contained at least 2 identified peptides. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm.23

Determination of kinetic rate constants of inhibition

The kinetics of inhibition was determined by the progress curve method under pseudo-first-order conditions with at least ten-fold molar excess of inhibitor. Recorded progress curves were analyzed by nonlinear regression according to the following equation:

equation M1

where [P] is the product, vz is the velocity at time zero and k is the pseudo-first-order rate constant. Apparent rate constant (kapp) was determined from the slope of plot k versus [I]. Because of the irreversible and competitive mechanism of inhibition, kapp was converted to the association constant (kass) using the equation below:

equation M2

Activity of human cathepsin L was measured with the fluorogenic substrate Z-FR-AMC (Bachem; Km = 7.1 μM) and cathepsin B was assayed against the fluorogenic substrate Z-RR-AMC (Bachem; Km = 114 μM). Concentration of substrates during the measurement was 10μM. Cathepsins B and L (1 nM final concentrations) were incubated with inhibitor concentrations ranging from 10 to 2,000 nM in the presence of 10 μM of appropriate substrate. Total volume during the measurement was 100 μl. The increase in fluorescence (370-nm Ex, 460-nm Em) was continuously monitored for 30 min with a Spectramax M5 fluorescent plate reader (Molecular Devices), and inhibition curves were recorded. DMSO concentration during all measurements was 3.5%.

Cell cultures

WT mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF), Cat L−/− MEF cells and Cat B−/− MEF cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 units ml−1 penicillin, 100μg ml−1 streptomycin. All cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

Labelling of intact cells with probes

WT and Cat L−/− (240,000 cells per well) and Cat B−/− (300,000 cells per well) were seeded in a six-well plate one day before treatment. Cells were pretreated with yzm09 (10 μM), or with control DMSO (0.1%) for 1 h and labeled for 1h by addition of yzm24 to culture medium. The final DMSO concentration was maintined at 0.2%. Cells were washed with PBS twice and lysed by addition of sample buffer (10% glycerol, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8, 3% SDS, and 5% β-mercaptoethanol). Lysates were boiled for 10 min and cleared by centrifugation. Equal amounts of protein per lane were separated by 15% SDS-PAGE, and labeled proteases were visualized by scanning of the gel with a Typhoon flatbed laser scanner (Ex/Em 532/580 nm).

Table 2
MS identification of labeled proteins in liver lysate by “on bead” digestion. Number of peptides identified for each protein are indicated with percentage of coverage in parenthesis.


This work was supported by National Institutes of Health National Technology Center for Networks and Pathways grant U54 RR020843, R01 EB005011, P01 CA072006, and a Stanford Chemical and Systems Biology training grant (to SV).


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


1. Campbell DA, Szardenings AK. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2003;7:296. [PubMed]
2. Jeffery DA, Bogyo M. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003;14:87. [PubMed]
3. Kozarich JW. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2003;7:78. [PubMed]
4. Speers AE, Cravatt BF. Chembiochem. 2004;5:41. [PubMed]
5. Verhelst SHL, Bogyo M. QSAR Comb Sci. 2005;24:261.
6. Evans MJ, Cravatt BF. Chem Rev. 2006;106:3279. [PubMed]
7. Powers JC, Asgian JL, Ekici OD, James KE. Chem Rev. 2002;102:4639. [PubMed]
8. Cravatt BF, Sorensen EJ. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2000;4:663. [PubMed]
9. Yuan F, Verhelst SHL, Blum G, Coussens LM, Bogyo M. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:5616. [PubMed]
10. Palmer JT, Rasnick D, Klaus JL, Bromme D. J Med Chem. 1995;38:3193. [PubMed]
11. Wang G, Yao SQ. Org Lett. 2003;5:4437. [PubMed]
12. Borodovsky A, Ovaa H, Meester WJN, Venanzi ES, Bogyo MS, Hekking BG, Ploegh HL, Kessler BM, Overkleeft HS. Chembiochem. 2005;6:287. [PubMed]
13. Hemelaar J, Borodovsky A, Kessler BM, Reverter D, Cook J, Kolli N, Gan-Erdene T, Wilkinson KD, Gill G, Lima CD, Ploegh HL, Ovaa H. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:84. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Overkleeft HS, Bos PR, Hekking BG, Gordon EJ, Ploegh HL, Kessler BM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:6005.
15. Bogyo M, Shin S, McMaster JS, Ploegh HL. Chem Biol. 1998;5:307. [PubMed]
16. Nazif T, Bogyo M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:2967. [PubMed]
17. Santos MMM, Moreira R. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2007;7:1040. [PubMed]
18. Choe Y, Brinen LS, Price MS, Engel JC, Lange M, Grisostomi C, Weston SG, Pallai PV, Cheng H, Hardy LW, Hartsough DS, McMakin M, Tilton RF, Baldino CM, Craik CS. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005;13:2141. [PubMed]
19. Borodovsky A, Ovaa H, Kolli N, Gan-Erdene T, Wilkinson KD, Ploegh HL, Kessler BM. Chem Biol. 2002;9:1149. [PubMed]
20. Blum G, von Degenfeld G, Merchant MJ, Blau HM, Bogyo M. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:668. [PubMed]
21. Bogyo M, Phillips C. unpublished observation.
22. Wang G, Mahesh U, Chen GYJ, Yao SQ. Org Lett. 2003;5:737. [PubMed]
23. Fonovic M, Verhelst SHL, Sorum MT, Bogyo M. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007;6:1761. [PubMed]
24. Blum G, Mullins SR, Keren K, Fonovic M, Jedeszko C, Rice MJ, Sloane BF, Bogyo M. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1:203–9. [PubMed]
25. Bogyo M, Verhelst S, Bellingard-Dubouchaud V, Toba S, Greenbaum D. Chem Biol. 2000;7:27–38. [PubMed]