PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aemPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAEM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
Appl Environ Microbiol. Mar 2009; 75(6): 1487–1499.
Published online Jan 9, 2009. doi:  10.1128/AEM.01812-08
PMCID: PMC2655439
Variations in Archaeal and Bacterial Diversity Associated with the Sulfate-Methane Transition Zone in Continental Margin Sediments (Santa Barbara Basin, California)[down-pointing small open triangle]
Benjamin K. Harrison,1 Husen Zhang,1 Will Berelson,2 and Victoria J. Orphan1*
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 100-23, Pasadena, California 91125,1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Zumberge Hall of Science (ZHS), 3651 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, California 90089-07402
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, Mail Code 100-23, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125. Phone: (626) 395-1786. Fax: (626) 683-0621. E-mail: vorphan/at/gps.caltech.edu
Received August 5, 2008; Accepted January 5, 2009.
The sulfate-methane transition zone (SMTZ) is a widespread feature of continental margins, representing a diffusion-controlled interface where there is enhanced microbial activity. SMTZ microbial activity is commonly associated with the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), which is carried out by syntrophic associations between sulfate-reducing bacteria and methane-oxidizing archaea. While our understanding of the microorganisms catalyzing AOM has advanced, the diversity and ecological role of the greater microbial assemblage associated with the SMTZ have not been well characterized. In this study, the microbial diversity above, within, and beneath the Santa Barbara Basin SMTZ was described. ANME-1-related archaeal phylotypes appear to be the primary methane oxidizers in the Santa Barbara Basin SMTZ, which was independently supported by exclusive recovery of related methyl coenzyme M reductase genes (mcrA). Sulfate-reducing Deltaproteobacteria phylotypes affiliated with the Desulfobacterales and Desulfosarcina-Desulfococcus clades were also enriched in the SMTZ, as confirmed by analysis of dissimilatory sulfite reductase (dsr) gene diversity. Statistical methods demonstrated that there was a close relationship between the microbial assemblages recovered from the two horizons associated with the geochemically defined SMTZ, which could be distinguished from microbial diversity recovered from the sulfate-replete overlying horizons and methane-rich sediment beneath the transition zone. Comparison of the Santa Barbara Basin SMTZ microbial assemblage to microbial assemblages of methane seeps and other organic matter-rich sedimentary environments suggests that bacterial groups not typically associated with AOM, such as Planctomycetes and candidate division JS1, are additionally enriched within the SMTZ and may represent a common bacterial signature of many SMTZ environments worldwide.
The sulfate-methane transition zone (SMTZ) is defined as the horizon within the sediment column in which sulfate and methane coexist (4, 63). In diffusion-controlled marine systems, the SMTZ represents a deep redox interface exhibiting increased microbial activity (50). Typically, sulfate is depleted with depth, and this interface divides a zone in which sulfate reduction is the dominant form of microbial respiration and a zone in which methanogenesis is the dominant form of microbial respiration. Within the SMTZ, most sulfate depletion is presumed to be directly coupled to the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) (11, 55), and there are balanced rates of methane oxidation and sulfate reduction (6, 25, 44, 47), as predicted by the stoichiometry of the reaction. In some sites, however, sulfate reduction cannot be balanced by AOM, which provides only a fraction of the total carbon and energy for sulfate reduction (4, 12, 27, 62, 63). Discrepancies between sulfate flux and methane flux have been observed in a number of sites off the California and Mexico coasts and may be a global phenomenon along continental margins (4).
Geochemical modeling suggests that excess CO2 flux may be balanced if sulfate reduction is coupled not only to AOM but also to the enhanced breakdown of organic carbon (4). The SMTZ sediment horizon may therefore represent a zone of enhanced overall microbial activity and remineralization coupled to rejuvenated organiclastic sulfate reduction. This raises questions of why presumably recalcitrant organic matter should pass through more shallow horizons directly above the SMTZ only to be coupled to sulfate reduction independent of AOM within the transition zone and whether microorganisms residing in the interface play a significant role in organic matter activation. A more detailed investigation of the full microbial assemblage specific to the SMTZ is needed to understand the role of the interface in early diagenesis.
Distinct groups of uncultured sulfate-reducing Deltaproteobacteria and methane-oxidizing archaea (ANMEs) have been linked to the process of AOM in diverse marine environments and have been described primarily for advective near-seafloor sites where there is methane release, including methane seeps and mud volcanoes (21, 30, 46, 48, 61). Microbial assemblages from deeper, diffusion-limited environments along continental margins have been investigated to a lesser extent. Within these subseafloor habitats, ANMEs are present in some methane- and hydrate-impacted sediments (34, 42, 49, 56, 62); however, their detection in other SMTZ-related sites has been inconsistent and has invoked speculation that additional archaeal groups distinct from the methanogen-related ANME groups may also be capable of AOM (5, 23, 57). The coassociated bacterial assemblage surrounding the SMTZ in these deeper diffusion-controlled systems has been described in even fewer studies (23, 49, 50, 56).
Here, the bacterial and archaeal diversity in the sediment horizons above, within, and below the diffusion-controlled SMTZ in the Santa Barbara Basin (SBB) was characterized using a combination of 16S rRNA genes and functional genes coding for methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) and dissimilatory sulfite reductase (dsrA) to document changes in microbial assemblage diversity and structure associated with this globally important redox interface. The organic matter-rich sediments of the SBB are well suited for this type of investigation, having a well-defined sulfate-methane transition within gravity core depth of the sediment-water interface, and are a reasonable analogue for diverse diffusion-controlled continental margin environments. This setting has also served as an important resource for paleoclimatological studies (3), for which more extensive knowledge of subsurface diagenetic processes may be informative. The application of statistical comparisons of the microbial diversity recovered from SBB sediments above, within, and below the SMTZ with data from other available studies of bacterial and archaeal diversity in SMTZ, hydrate-bearing, methane seeps and organic matter-rich marine sediments was used to broadly define microbial groups which may be characteristic of SMTZs and to distinguish candidate groups potentially responsible for accelerated remineralization of organic matter within these horizons.
Site description and sampling.
In June 2005, an expedition on the R/V New Horizon collected a series of sediment cores within the SBB (34°13.61′N, 119°59.42′W). At this location, the water depth was 587 m, and the bottom water oxygen content at the time of sampling was determined to be 0.2 μM (4). Sediment was collected by either gravity coring or multicoring for pore water, isotope, mineralogical, and microbiological analyses. One gravity core (GC2) with geochemical properties representative of the majority of cores analyzed was selected for more detailed molecular analysis of the microbial community. Gravity core GC2 (length, 186 cm) was fully processed within 3 h of arrival on deck. Subsamples (~5 g) were taken from the center portion of the core using a cutoff 5-ml sterile syringe and immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen for nucleic acid extraction. Five sediment horizons were targeted in the study; the samples included one sample from the nominal sulfate reduction zone (50 cm), one sample from immediately above the SMTZ (103 cm), two samples from within the SMTZ (125 cm and 139 cm), and one sample from below the SMTZ (163 cm).
Pore water chemistry (sulfate and dissolved inorganic carbon).
The pore water sulfate and dissolved inorganic carbon contents were determined as previously described (4). Multicores with an intact sediment-water interface were processed, and these cores served to link gravity cores to the sediment-water interface. Total CO2 (TCO2) ([H2CO3] + [HCO3] + [CO32−]) was analyzed with a Coulemetrics coulometer as previously described (4), and pore water sulfate was analyzed using the turbidimetric method (59).
Nucleic acid extraction and purification.
Total DNA was extracted from sediment samples (0.5 g) using a Powersoil DNA extraction kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA). The Mo Bio protocol was modified by initially heating the sample at 65°C twice for 5 min, followed by bead beating using a Fastprep machine (Bio101-Thermo Electron Corp., Gormley, Ontario, Canada) set at a speed of 5.0 for 45 s. The extracts from two independent extractions were combined and cleaned by cesium chloride density gradient centrifugation as previously described (48). The washed and purified DNA was recovered in Tris-EDTA buffer using a Microcon membrane device (YM-100 or Amicon Ultra-4; Millipore, Billerica, MA).
Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene clone libraries from sediment horizons corresponding to depths above (50 cm and 103 cm), within (125 cm and 139 cm), and below (163 cm) the SMTZ were constructed. Parallel with the rRNA gene analysis, metabolic gene clone libraries for the fragment encoding the alpha and beta subunits of dissimilatory sulfite reductase (dsrAB) (65) and for the fragment encoding the alpha subunit of methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) were constructed (Table (Table11).
TABLE 1.
TABLE 1.
Microbial diversity of SBB sediment
Archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA gene, mcrA, and dsrAB library construction.
PCR mixtures (25 μl) were prepared as follows: 1× Hotmaster PCR buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 0.1 μg of each primer, and 0.25 μl of Hotmaster Taq polymerase (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany).
Archaeal 16S rRNA genes were PCR amplified using archaeon-specific primers AR-8F (5′-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCC-3′) and AR-958R (5′-YCCGGCGTTGAMTCCAATT-3′), and bacterial libraries were constructed using bacterium-specific forward primer BAC-27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTGAG-3′) and universal reverse primer U-1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) (10, 33). PCR amplifications were performed in a Eppendorf Mastercycler using an initial denaturing step of 95°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles (archaea) or 27 cycles (bacteria) of 94°C for 1 min, 54°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min and then an elongation step of 72°C for 6 min. PCR mixtures started with 0.1, 1, and 2 μl template were pooled to minimize PCR artifacts associated with differences in template abundance (52).
A 480-bp fragment of mcrA was amplified with primers MCR-F (5′-GGTGGTGTMGGATTCACACAR-3′) and MCR-R (5′-TTCATTGCRTAGTTWGGRTAG-3′) (41) using an initial denaturing step of 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 (163-cm and 125-cm samples) or 45 cycles (139-cm sample) of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min and then a final elongation step of 72°C for 6 min. mcrA amplification was attempted for depths of 103 cm and below. The 103-cm horizon did not yield an mcrA amplicon.
A 1.9-kb fragment of dsrAB was amplified using a mixture of primers, DSR1F mix and DSR4R mix (65). To minimize significant nonspecific product formation observed using standard PCR, a touchdown PCR procedure was performed with the annealing temperature decreasing (1°C every two cycles) from 61 to 54°C for the first 15 cycles, which was followed by 22 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 54°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 3 min and then a final elongation step of 72°C for 6 min. This touchdown procedure significantly reduced the products with multiple sizes observed with standard PCR and generated a robust 1.9-kb PCR product.
Sequence and phylogenetic analysis.
PCR products of the correct size were cloned using either the pCR4-TOPO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) or pGEM-T Easy (Promega, Madison, WI) system according to the manufacturer's instructions. The amplified inserts were further analyzed by using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) with either HaeIII (for 16S rRNA genes and dsrAB) or RsaI (for mcrA) (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) to identify unique RFLP patterns for sequencing. One or two unique clones from each RFLP pattern were selected. Unique clones from each library were bidirectionally sequenced using a CEQ 8800 capillary sequencer according to the DTCS protocol (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). For most samples, vector-targeted primers T7 and M13R were used. Inserts more than 1 kb long (i.e., bacterial 16S rRNA gene and dsrAB libraries) were additionally sequenced using 16S rRNA-targeted primer 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and internal dsrAB-targeted primers 1FI (5′-CAGGAYGARCTBCAYCG-3′) and 1R1 (5′-CCCTGGGTRTGNAYRAT-3′) (2, 12). For phylogenetic analysis, only the dsrA subunit was used, resulting in a bidirectional sequence combining a vector-targeted primer with an internal dsr primer.
Sequence assembly was performed using Sequencher 4.5 software (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI). The closest relatives of the retrieved sequences in the GenBank database were identified using BLASTN (1). Potential chimeric sequences were identified using CHIMERA_CHECK (8) and Bellerophon (22). For the 16S rRNA gene, sequence data were compiled by using the ARB software package (40) and were initially aligned using the ARB Fast Aligner utility. The resulting alignments were manually verified using known secondary-structure regions. For phylogenetic analysis, the alignments were exported to PAUP*4.0 (58). Bacterial 16S rRNA gene phylogenies were constructed using MEGA 4 (60). Tree reconstruction was performed with the distance matrix and maximum parsimony algorithms. For 16S rRNA genes, trees based on 519 and 1,251 unambiguously aligned positions were constructed for archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes, respectively. mcrA and dsrA trees were based on 147 and 164 translated amino acid characters.
Statistical methods.
Correspondence analysis (19) was applied to SBB 16S rRNA clone libraries and libraries for similar marine sedimentary environments obtained from the literature (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) in order to discern patterns of variation among major phylogenetic groups for different geochemical environments. Clone libraries were characterized by previously described geochemistry data or by sediment description and were normalized to describe variation between 10 dominant groups (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Data sets that contained fewer than 30 environmental clones or in which >50% of the phylotypes fell outside these divisions were excluded (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Correspondence analysis was implemented using DECORANA software (20) and provides a visual representation of the relationship between samples (i.e., each library) and species (unique phylogenetic groups) along ordination axes calculated to maximize correlation between samples and species scores (20). Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees constructed for representative SBB 16S rRNA sequences and additional sequences from related environments were used in UniFrac analysis (38). UniFrac derives an environmental distance matrix from the portion of a phylogenetic tree that may be uniquely ascribed to a specific environment (clone library). We used both unweighted (38) and weighted (39) UniFrac to describe the similarity between clone libraries derived from common environmental conditions, as assigned above. Weighted UniFrac uses clonal abundance of specific sequences to adjust the environmental distance calculated with the unweighted algorithm based on each environment's unique portion of the phylogenetic tree.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences of the rRNA gene clones have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. EU181461 to EU181514 and FJ455875 to FJ455963, the nucleotide sequences of the mcrA clones have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. FJ456011 to FJ456019, and the dsrA sequences have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. FJ455964 to FJ456010.
Geochemical analyses.
Pore water profiles acquired from SBB gravity cores indicate that the SMTZ was approximately 140 cm beneath the sediment-water interface. The observed TCO2 concentration gradient was linear (R2 = 0.91) from 30 cm below the sediment-water interface down to about 120 cm to 155 cm, where a change in slope corresponding to the SMTZ was documented (Fig. (Fig.1).1). The sulfate concentration gradient was also linear through this portion of the core, and there was a change in the slope at the SMTZ. Models of these concentration gradients suggest that reactions involving sulfate and CO2 occur within the SMTZ but cannot be explained by AOM exclusively (4; W. M. Berelson and F. Sansone, unpublished data). Based on linear gradients and as determined by the methodology described by Berelson et al. (4), the diffusive flux of methane to the sulfate-methane interface (0.5 ± 0.05 mmol/m2 day−1) is less than the change in the TCO2 flux occurring at the horizon (0.7 ± 0.1 mmol/m2 day−1); thus, methane oxidation is probably not the only source of TCO2 added to this horizon, and we hypothesize that there may be an additional, localized source of TCO2 generated by sulfate oxidation of organic carbon specifically at the SMTZ.
FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Pore water profiles for SO4, CH4, and TCO2 for the SBB. The trend lines indicate approximate TCO2 and sulfate profiles combined from multicore data preserving the water-sediment interface and gravity core sampling to greater depths. The change in slope (more ...)
Patterns of species richness in SBB.
Microbial diversity was assessed by RFLP screening of 503 bacterial and 395 archaeal clones from the five discrete depth horizons from core GC-2 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Shannon-Wiener and Simpson's diversity indices indicate that there is decreasing archaeal diversity with increasing depth in SBB sediment, while the recovered bacterial 16S rRNA diversity appears to increase from the uppermost 50 cm to the 125-cm horizon in the upper part of the SMTZ and then declines at depths below 139 cm (Table (Table1).1). In all but the 50-cm depth horizon, the bacterial species richness was greater than the archaeal species richness. Changes in diversity indices with depth were not consistent between archaeal and bacterial clone libraries. However, for each domain the 125-cm upper SMTZ horizon appeared to represent a local maximum for both diversity indices.
Microbial diversity overlying the SMTZ.
The major groups recovered from the 50-cm and 103-cm horizons above the SMTZ were the Planctomycetes, green nonsulfur bacteria (GNS) (Chloroflexi), and candidate division OP8 (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Plantomycetes was the dominant bacterial phylum above the transition zone (Table (Table2).2). The majority of Planctomycetes sequences fall into the uncultured WPS-1 clade (14), which is common in environments with significant concentrations of organic matter, including marine continental margins (Fig. (Fig.2C)2C) (14). Candidate division OP8 clones constitute ~22% of the 50- and 103-cm bacterial libraries, and the percentage then declines with depth. This group is a minor component of marine sediments, but it has been detected in similar methane-impacted environments, such as the Guaymas Basin (61), the Gulf of Mexico (37), and the Peru and Cascadia Margins (23), as well as in iron- and sulfate-reducing zones of a hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer (13). Gammaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria sequences were recovered exclusively from sediments overlying the SMTZ (Table (Table22 and Fig. Fig.2B).2B). Deltaproteobacteria sequences were surprisingly absent from the 50-cm library and represented only 6% of the bacterial diversity recovered from the 103-cm sample. These low-abundance phylotypes were most closely related to putative sulfate-reducing phylotypes recovered from the underlying SMTZ.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
(A) Bacterial 16S rRNA neighbor-joining distance tree for representative SBB sequences (indicated by bold type). The values at the nodes are bootstrap values based on distance for 2,000 replicates/bootstrap values based on parsimony for 800 replicates. (more ...)
TABLE 2.
TABLE 2.
Distribution of major phylogenetic groups
The archaeal diversity at 50 cm was dominated (58%) by euryarchaeotal marine benthic group D (MBGD) (64), related to the Thermoplasmatales (Fig. (Fig.3).3). The close relatives of the MBGD phylotypes included sequences recovered from other methane-impacted marine sediments (21, 23, 24, 30), but they are not found exclusively in these habitats. Adjacent to and within the SMTZ, at 103 cm and 139 cm, Crenarchaeota marine benthic group B (MBGB) replaced MBGD as the dominant archaeal group, representing 71% and 61% of the clones, respectively.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Archaeal 16S rRNA neighbor-joining distance tree for representative SBB sequences (indicated by bold type). The values at the nodes are bootstrap values based on distance for 5,000 replicates/bootstrap values based on parsimony for 200 replicates. Values (more ...)
Microbial diversity within the SMTZ.
The most abundant bacterial phylotypes from the SMTZ were affiliated with the Eel-1 group within the Deltaproteobacteria, a cluster of putative sulfate-reducing bacteria first described from a methane seep in the Eel River Basin (48) and distantly related to Desulfobacterium anilini (91% similarity). On average, the Eel-1 clade accounts for ~30% of both the 125-cm and 139-cm clone libraries (59% and 80% of the recovered Deltaproteobacteria phylotypes, respectively) (Table (Table22 and Fig. Fig.3).3). The second most abundant clade of Deltaproteobacteria was related to the putative syntrophic Desulfosarcina-Desulfococcus clade (DSS) commonly recovered from seafloor methane seeps (30, 48) (Table (Table2).2). In the SBB, DSS phylotypes were present within the SMTZ (~14% of the total), as well as the sediment above and below this zone. Planctomycetes-affiliated phylotypes related to the WPS-1 group were enriched in one of the SMTZ horizons; they represented 30% of the 139-cm bacterial library but only 8% of the 125-cm bacterial assemblage.
Sequences belonging to candidate division JS1 represent only ~6% of the bacterial libraries. However, this group appears to be enriched within the SMTZ. Originally identified in Japan Sea sediments, members of candidate division JS1 have also been commonly recovered from methane hydrate-associated marine sediments, such as sediments from the Nankai Trough, Hydrate Ridge, and the Peru Margin (23, 30, 45). Additionally, sequences affiliated with the Actinobacteria were recovered with low abundance, but only from the SMTZ and the immediately overlying horizon (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Inferences based on the environmental distribution and cultured relatives suggest that these organisms are heterotrophic and may be adapted to sulfur- and/or methane-rich environments (7).
In methane-containing horizons within and below the SMTZ, sequences closely related to uncultured ANME-1 archaea were recovered. These phylotypes were not present in the two sulfate-reducing horizons above the SMTZ (50 and 103 cm), which is consistent with their role in AOM. ANME-1-affiliated phylotypes accounted for 14% of the archaeal diversity within the SMTZ (125 and 139 cm), and the percentage increased to 24% in the sulfate-depleted sediments below this zone (163 cm). The ANME-1-affiliated sequences from all three depths formed two clades (95% similarity) falling in the ANME-1a group, which includes sequences from the Eel River Basin and Gulf of Mexico methane seeps (15, 37) (Fig. (Fig.33).
Microbial diversity in sediments underlying the SMTZ.
Members of the Chloroflexi, also referred to as the GNS, were the dominant bacteria beneath the SMTZ (163 cm) and represented 40% of the recovered bacterial diversity, compared to 6 to 14% in the horizons above the transition zone. GNS-affiliated sequences were quite diverse (75% overall similarity). Sequences from the 50-cm and 103-cm horizons group with the T78 clade, which is closely related to the dominant phylotype reported for Mediterranean sapropels (9). Other sequences that were recovered from all depths but 50 cm and are dominant within and below the SMTZ group broadly with cultured strains of Dehalococcoides. Sequences associated with candidate division OP1 exhibited a distribution similar to that of the GNS group; the greatest abundance was recovered from the 163-cm library (17%), and these sequences were restricted primarily to sediments outside the SMTZ (50 cm, 103 cm, and 163 cm) (Table (Table22).
Diversity of dissimilatory sulfite reductase and methyl coenzyme M reductase across the SMTZ.
In order to further characterize the diversity of sulfate-reducing microorganisms associated with the SMTZ, dissimilatory sulfite reductase (dsr) genes were analyzed for the four lower horizons of the SBB core. Phylogenetic analysis of the most abundant dsr sequences confirmed the presence of sulfate-reducing Deltaproteobacteria (Fig. (Fig.4),4), with several sequences—exclusive to the SMTZ—clustering with Desulfobacterium anilini (group IV [28] and cluster D [35]). The sequences most commonly recovered from the 103-cm and 125-cm dsr libraries fall in a clade composed of uncultured Deltaproteobacteria and cluster with sequences from Black Sea and South China Sea sediments (DSS relatives, group I [28], and cluster B [35]). Additional dsrA diversity recovered from the SBB included deeply branching sequences related to dsrA genes reported from the Black Sea (clusters I, H, G, and F [35]).
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Neighbor-joining distance tree based on 114 informative characters of translated partial dissimilatory sulfite reductase (dsrA) amino acid sequences from the SBB. The values at the nodes are bootstrap values based on distance for 2,000 replicates/bootstrap (more ...)
The diversity and distribution of methanogens and methanotrophic archaea were examined using methyl coenzyme M reductase gene (mcrA) analysis. mcrA genes were successfully amplified from all sample depths below 125 cm but were not recovered from sediments above the SMTZ. mcrA phylotypes from the SBB exhibited limited diversity (92% similarity at the amino acid level), and all of them clustered within the previously described mcrA “group a,” which was assigned to the uncultured ANME-1 archaea (15, 26, 37) (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).
Statistical comparison of diversity for methane-influenced marine sediments.
As characterized by correspondence analysis (19), marine sediments harbor a diverse bacterial assemblage within which communities associated with different geochemical horizons and sediment depths (i.e., advective methane seeps and mud volcanoes, diffusion-controlled SMTZ, organic matter- and clay-rich sediments) overlap considerably (Fig. (Fig.5;5; see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Site-specific variations in physicochemical conditions, biogeographic influences, and a lack of standardized criteria for defining SMTZ horizons in the literature complicate the application of microbial diversity and abundance methods to statistically identify the SMTZ, the sulfate-replete horizon above the SMTZ, and the sulfate-depleted, methane-rich sediment below the SMTZ. Differences in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct geochemical horizons in the SBB are apparent; however, a statistically identifiable difference between the SMTZ and a lower methanogenic horizon was not observed, with both communities grouping within the 95% confidence interval defining the SMTZ-associated bacterial diversity (Fig. (Fig.55).
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Correspondence analysis (19) of marine sedimentary bacterial communities assigned to specific redox zones (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). SMTZ-related communities overlap with near-seafloor seep assemblages and communities in other organic (more ...)
Despite the coarse resolution afforded by correspondence analysis, trends in bacterial diversity between different geochemical and lithological sedimentary environments are apparent. For example, while there is substantial overlap in the bacterial groups present in near-seafloor methane seeps and vents and diffusion-controlled deeper SMTZ horizons, the frequent enrichment of Epsilonproteobacteria in near-seafloor seeps along with the rare occurrence of this proteobacterial lineage at depth appears to be a distinguishing feature of these two methane-influenced habitats. Candidate division JS1 phylotypes are often associated with hydrate-bearing sediments (66) and may play a role in diffusion-based SMTZ horizons as well. Overall, the SMTZ-associated horizons cluster together as a subgroup in a broader range of marine sedimentary environments classified by high organic matter content (i.e., continental margin sediments) (Fig. (Fig.5;5; see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material).
In our analysis, SMTZ horizons additionally exhibited enrichment of Deltaproteobacteria, consistent with dissimilatory sulfate reduction, and showed some enrichment of Planctomycetes-related phylotypes. Candidate division OP8 and Betaproteobacteria phylotypes also appear to be relatively abundant in some methane-impacted environments, but they were not enriched in the SBB SMTZ. The clustering of bacterial diversity within specific geochemical environments was similar when different axes of variation derived from correspondence analysis were used (see Fig. S3 and Table S2 in the supplemental material), as well as when detrended correspondence analysis and principal component analysis were used.
Greater resolution of the variation in microbial assemblages associated with the transition through the SMTZ was achieved using the UniFrac metric (38). Applying UniFrac to the SBB sequences alone, we observed a close relationship between the SBB SMTZ horizons to the exclusion of sediments above and below, using the unweighted and weighted algorithms with our bacterial 16S rRNA data set (Fig. (Fig.6).6). The relationship between SMTZ horizons persisted within the SBB Deltaproteobacteria (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). This observation suggests that the SMTZ horizons are broadly similar in terms of species richness and phylotype identity, predominantly within the Deltaproteobacteria but extending to other bacterial phyla as well. Compared to data for similar environments described previously (18, 37), SMTZ-related bacterial diversities from independent studies group together, again primarily due to close relationships within the Deltaproteobacteria (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). Similar clustering was observed for the archaea in the SBB; however, the clustering order was not maintained using the weighted algorithm, largely due to the abundance of MBGD sequences at 125 cm in contrast to the dominance of MBGB at 139 cm and the presence of ANME-1 in the 163-cm horizon (Fig. (Fig.66).
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
UniFrac cladograms for 16S rRNA archaeal and bacterial community composition across the SMTZ (as assessed by using environmental clone libraries). The Jacknife values at the nodes are based on 100 replicates. Values of <40 are not shown. (A) Unweighted (more ...)
Potential phylogenetic groups that may be associated with the unique physicochemical and ecological environment created by the intersection of methane and sulfate within the SBB SMTZ were characterized. A necessary component for increasing our understanding of the microbial ecology of this unique geochemical interface is a thorough characterization of microbial assemblages common to SMTZ horizons. Statistical analysis of common phylogenetic clades recovered from the SBB and previously published diversity surveys for similar environments highlight additional microbial groups not commonly associated with the anaerobic oxidation of methane which may be core components of the broader SMTZ microbial assemblage. While the physiology of phylotypes recovered in this study remains unresolved, the distribution of the phylotypes in relation to the SMTZ provides some insight into their potential role in diffusion-controlled continental margin sediments.
Within the SBB, archaeal and bacterial libraries showed enhanced phylotype richness adjacent to and within the SMTZ, consistent with stimulation of phylogenetic and possibly metabolic diversity surrounding this redox transition zone (Table (Table1).1). Statistical analysis using the UniFrac metric demonstrated that there is a well-supported relationship between bacterial diversities within the upper and lower SMTZ horizons (Fig. (Fig.6).6). In general, the microbial community structure within the SBB SMTZ shares many similarities with the structures of other diffusion-controlled and advective marine organic matter-rich sedimentary systems, including phylotypes previously identified as mediators of AOM (ANME archaea and select Deltaproteobacteria) and other microorganisms in predominately uncultured clades, such as the Planctomycetes, GNS, and candidate divisions OP8 and JS1, whose ecological roles in this environment have not been defined. Compared to findings in studies of similar environments, a subset of SMTZ-related horizons from different geological settings cluster together within the bacterial domain using UniFrac, mainly due to close relationships within the Deltaproteobacteria and, to a lesser degree, Planctomycetes group WPS-1 (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material).
Phyla characteristic of the SMTZ in the SBB.
Within the SBB, members of the ANME-1a lineage appear to be the dominant methanotrophic archaeal group, based on analysis of 16S rRNA, recovered from both sediment horizons analyzed for the geochemically defined SMTZ. The presence of the ANME-1 group supports previous observations for advective methane seep environments indicating potential adaptation by this group to deeper sediments with reduced sulfate levels (21, 31, 48). However, recent studies suggest that selective pressures determining the distribution of the ANME groups are likely controlled by other ecological or physicochemical factors in addition to sulfate and methane concentrations (32, 37, 49). While data are limited, there appears to be no consistent trend for the ANME diversity recovered from diffusively controlled SMTZs. For example, organic matter-rich sediments of Skagerrak, Denmark, appeared to select for members of the ANME-2 and ANME-3 groups within and below the SMTZ (49). The potential for distinct ANME groups to carry out AOM at disparate localities complicates the use of these groups for broadly characterizing SMTZ microbial diversity by statistical analyses.
Bacterial diversity, largely dominated by Deltaproteobacteria, was significantly correlated for the two SMTZ horizons, suggesting that there is selective colonization of the SMTZ by related bacterial phylotypes (Fig. (Fig.6;6; see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). Deltaproteobacteria sequences affiliated with sulfate-reducing bacteria were enriched within both SMTZ horizons relative to sediment horizons above and below this zone. Sulfate-reducing microorganisms that may be involved in sulfate-mediated AOM and/or organic carbon remineralization in the SMTZ included phylotypes previously reported for near-seafloor methane seeps, including members of the cosmopolitan DSS group and the Desulfobacterium-affiliated Eel-1 group (48). The facultatively syntrophic DSS clade has been described for diverse marine sedimentary environments (36, 43, 53, 54), and members of this group were recovered from all horizons except the uppermost horizon in the SBB. Likewise, the distribution and enrichment of the Desulfosarcina-related dsrA sequence, closely related to sequences recovered from Black Sea sediments near the SMTZ (35), further support the common occurrence of this SBB lineage in diverse marine sedimentary environments.
A comparison of methane-associated environments where members of the Eel-1 group have been recovered indicates cooccurrence and a possible relationship with members of the methanotrophic ANME-1 group (16, 21, 37, 48). The significant enrichment of this group within the SBB SMTZ relative to surrounding sediment horizons suggests that members of the Eel-1 clade may be linked to AOM and/or involved in sulfate-dependent organic carbon remineralization hypothesized to be enhanced within the transition zone. While the physiology of the uncultured Eel-1 clade has not been described, related Desulfobacterales isolates and Eel-1-containing enrichment cultures are capable of degrading aromatic hydrocarbons (17, 51), suggesting that members of the Eel-1 group may utilize complex sources of carbon associated with the SMTZ. As Eel-1 members have not been cultured, the associated dsrAB sequence is currently not known. However, the distributions of Eel-1 phylotypes and Desulfobacterium-related group IV dsrA suggest a possible link based on phylogenetic inference.
In addition to the Deltaproteobacteria-affiliated dsrA clades in the SBB, there were also a number of deeply branching dsr clades within and surrounding the SMTZ, implying that there may be additional, as-yet-unidentified microorganisms with the capacity for sulfate reduction that were not readily identified or recovered in the parallel 16S rRNA survey. Many of these dsrA phylotypes clustered with sequences recovered from similar environments, in particular sequences from the Nankai Trough (28) and Black Sea (35). Some phylotypes, like the Syntrophobacter-affiliated clade, likely represent additional diversity within the Deltaproteobacteria, while other deeply branching clades were represented only by environmental sequences and may be associated with novel groups of sulfate-reducing bacteria. While horizontal gene transfer may obscure the phylogenetic correlation between 16S rRNA and dsr (29), the substantial diversity of uncultured 16S rRNA candidate divisions detected in the SBB and related methane-impacted sedimentary environments indicates that one or more of these uncultured lineages may be capable of dissimilatory sulfate reduction.
Defining a global community signature for the SMTZ by microbial phylogeny.
Statistical evaluation of the microbial diversity recovered from the SBB revealed microbial groups common to the SMTZ whose clonal abundance changes across this geochemically defined horizon, including the Planctomycetes, candidate division JS1, Actinobacteria, Crenarchaeota MBGB, and Thermoplasmatales-related Euryarchaeota (Table (Table2).2). These groups contribute to a general SMTZ signature (Fig. (Fig.6)6) but are not necessarily associated with AOM. Correspondence analysis of a broad range of organic matter-rich and methane-impacted marine sedimentary environments in addition to the SBB revealed a possible relationship between Deltaproteobacteria, GNS, and Planctomycetes in SMTZ-related environments (Fig. (Fig.5;5; see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). In addition to the predicted enrichment of sulfate-reducing Deltaproteobacteria within the SMTZ, the implied relationship between members of the Planctomycetes, GNS, and, in some settings, candidate division JS1 and Betaproteobacteria in the SMTZ is less clear. The Planctomycetes-affiliated WPS-1 clade was abundant in the lower 139-cm SMTZ horizon but was not confined exclusively to the redox interface in the SBB. The apparent affinity of this clade for organic matter-rich, anaerobic environments suggests that the WPS-1 clade may be an important group of heterotrophs within the SMTZ. The relative percentage of candidate division JS1 (previously identified as OP9 related [67]) increased slightly within the SBB SMTZ. The apparent relationship of the organisms in this clade with hydrate-bearing deep subseafloor habitats (23) and their ability to anaerobically metabolize organic carbon (67, 68) suggest that this group may also contribute to enhanced carbon cycling within the SMTZ.
SMTZs frequently exhibit enrichment of one or more of the methanotrophic ANME groups; however, exceptions have been noted, opening the possibility that additional lineages (e.g., MBGB) may be involved in methane oxidation (5, 57). The distribution of archaeal diversity in our study supports the observation of MBGB enrichment in association with methane and active AOM assemblages (23). In contrast, the miscellaneous crenarchaeotal group (MCG) exhibited a negative relationship with the SBB SMTZ. Similar patterns of spatial segregation between the MCG and MBGB have been documented for other methane-influenced marine sediments (23, 57), suggesting that unique adaptive traits and/or selective pressures may influence the distribution of the uncultured MBGB and MCG in these subseafloor habitats.
Geochemical modeling predicts that complex and integrated microbial processes involving anaerobic oxidation of methane and organic carbon mineralization are stimulated at the SMTZ. Through combined molecular analysis of microbial assemblages associated with SMTZ horizons around the globe, we are beginning to develop an understanding of the patterns of diversity associated with this important redox interface. The application of rigorous statistical tests to produce a unified overview of the common groups of microorganisms associated with the SMTZ within continental margin sediments is complicated by poor representation in the public databases, inconsistencies in defining and sampling the transition zone in published studies, and possible biogeographic differences. Nonetheless, characterization of key microbial groups, such as the Planctomycetes, candidate division JS1, and the Deltaproteobacteria commonly inhabiting the SMTZ, in this and other studies is valuable and provides an essential framework for follow-up studies in which select lineages from the SMTZ can be studied in detail using quantitative measures.
Supplementary Material
[Supplemental material]
Footnotes
[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 9 January 2009.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.
1. Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Bahr, M., B. C. Crump, V. Klepac-Ceraj, A. Teske, M. L. Sogin, and J. E. Hobbie. 2005. Molecular characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a New England salt marsh. Environ. Microbiol. 7:1175-1185. [PubMed]
3. Behl, R. J., and J. P. Kennett. 1996. Brief interstadial events in the Santa Barbara basin, NE Pacific, during the past 60 kyr. Nature 379:243-246.
4. Berelson, W. M., M. Prokopenko, F. J. Sansone, A. W. Graham, J. McManus, and J. M. Bernhard. 2005. Anaerobic diagenesis of silica and carbon in continental margin sediments: discrete zones of TCO2 production. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69:4611-4629.
5. Biddle, J. F., J. S. Lipp, M. A. Lever, K. G. Lloyd, K. B. Sørensen, R. Anderson, H. F. Fredricks, M. Elvert, T. J. Kelly, and D. P. Schrag. 2006. Heterotrophic Archaea dominate sedimentary subsurface ecosystems off Peru. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:3846-3851. [PubMed]
6. Borowski, W. S., C. K. Paull, and W. Ussler. 1996. Marine pore-water sulfate profiles indicate in situ methane flux from underlying gas hydrate. Geology 24:655-658.
7. Boschker, H. T. S., S. C. Nold, P. Wellsbury, D. Bos, W. de Graaf, R. Pel, R. J. Parkes, and T. E. Cappenberg. 1998. Direct linking of microbial populations to specific biogeochemical processes by 13C-labelling of biomarkers. Nature 392:801-805.
8. Cole, J. R., B. Chai, R. J. Farris, Q. Wang, S. A. Kulam, D. M. McGarrell, G. M. Garrity, and J. M. Tiedje. 2005. The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:D294-D296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Coolen, M. J., H. Cypionka, A. M. Sass, H. Sass, and J. Overmann. 2002. Ongoing modification of Mediterranean Pleistocene sapropels mediated by prokaryotes. Science 296:2407-2410. [PubMed]
10. DeLong, E. F. 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:5685-5689. [PubMed]
11. Devol, A. H., and S. I. Ahmed. 1981. Are high rates of sulphate reduction associated with anaerobic oxidation of methane? Nature 291:407-408.
12. Dhillon, A., A. Teske, J. Dillon, D. A. Stahl, and M. L. Sogin. 2003. Molecular characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the Guaymas Basin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:2765-2772. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Dojka, M. A., P. Hugenholtz, S. K. Haack, and N. R. Pace. 1998. Microbial diversity in a hydrocarbon- and chlorinated-solvent-contaminated aquifer undergoing intrinsic bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3869-3877. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Elshahed, M. S., N. H. Youssef, Q. Luo, F. Z. Najar, B. A. Roe, T. M. Sisk, S. I. Bühring, K. U. Hinrichs, and L. R. Krumholz. 2007. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of Planctomycetes from anaerobic, sulfide- and sulfur-rich Zodletone Spring, Oklahoma. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4707-4716. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Hallam, S. J., P. R. Girguis, C. M. Preston, P. M. Richardson, and E. F. DeLong. 2003. Identification of methyl coenzyme M reductase A (mcrA) genes associated with methane-oxidizing archaea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:5483-5491. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Hallam, S. J., N. Putnam, C. M. Preston, J. C. Detter, D. Rokhsar, P. M. Richardson, and E. F. DeLong. 2004. Reverse methanogenesis: testing the hypothesis with environmental genomics. Science 305:1457-1462. [PubMed]
17. Harms, G., K. Zengler, R. Rabus, F. Aeckersberg, D. Minz, R. Rossello-Mora, and F. Widdel. 1999. Anaerobic oxidation of o-xylene, m-xylene, and homologous alkylbenzenes by new types of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:999-1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Heijs, S. K., A. M. Laverman, L. J. Forney, P. R. Hardoim, and J. D. van Elsas. 2008. Comparison of deep-sea sediment microbial communities in the eastern Mediterranean. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 64:362-377. [PubMed]
19. Hill, M. O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Appl. Stat. 23:340-354.
20. Hill, M. O., and H. G. Gauch. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Plant Ecol. 42:47-58.
21. Hinrichs, K. U., J. M. Hayes, S. P. Sylva, P. G. Brewer, and E. F. DeLong. 1999. Methane-consuming archaebacteria in marine sediments. Nature 398:802-805. [PubMed]
22. Huber, T., G. Faulkner, and P. Hugenholtz. 2004. Bellerophon: a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 20:2317-2319. [PubMed]
23. Inagaki, F., T. Nunoura, S. Nakagawa, A. Teske, M. Lever, A. Lauer, M. Suzuki, K. Takai, M. Delwiche, F. S. Colwell, K. H. Nealson, K. Horikoshi, S. D'Hondt, and B. B. Jørgensen. 2006. Biogeographical distribution and diversity of microbes in methane hydrate-bearing deep marine sediments on the Pacific Ocean Margin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:2815-2820. [PubMed]
24. Inagaki, F., M. Suzuki, K. Takai, H. Oida, T. Sakamoto, K. Aoki, K. H. Nealson, and K. Horikoshi. 2003. Microbial communities associated with geological horizons in coastal subseafloor sediments from the Sea of Okhotsk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:7224-7235. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Iversen, N., and B. B. Jørgensen. 1985. Anaerobic methane oxidation rates at the sulfate-methane transition in marine sediments from Kattegat and Skagerrak (Denmark). Limnol. Oceanogr. 30:944-955.
26. Jørgensen, B. B., A. Weber, and J. Zopfi. 2001. Sulfate reduction and anaerobic methane oxidation in Black Sea sediments. Deep-Sea Res. Part I 48:2097-2120.
27. Joye, S. B., A. Boetius, B. N. Orcutt, J. P. Montoya, H. N. Schulz, M. J. Erickson, and S. K. Lugo. 2004. The anaerobic oxidation of methane and sulfate reduction in sediments from Gulf of Mexico cold seeps. Chem. Geol. 205:219-238.
28. Kaneko, R., T. Hayashi, M. Tanahashi, and T. Naganuma. 2007. Phylogenetic diversity and distribution of dissimilatory sulfite reductase genes from deep-sea sediment cores. Mar. Biotechnol. 9:429-436. [PubMed]
29. Klein, M., M. Friedrich, A. J. Roger, P. Hugenholtz, S. Fishbain, H. Abicht, L. L. Blackall, D. A. Stahl, and M. Wagner. 2001. Multiple lateral transfers of dissimilatory sulfite reductase genes between major lineages of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes. J. Bacteriol. 183:6028-6035. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Knittel, K., A. Boetius, A. Lemke, H. Eilers, K. Lochte, O. Pfannkuche, P. Linke, and R. Amann. 2003. Activity, distribution, and diversity of sulfate reducers and other bacteria in sediments above gas hydrate (Cascadia Margin, Oregon). Geomicrobiol. J. 20:269-294.
31. Knittel, K., T. Losekann, A. Boetius, R. Kort, and R. Amann. 2005. Diversity and distribution of methanotrophic archaea at cold seeps. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:467-479. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Kruger, M., M. Blumenberg, S. Kasten, A. Wieland, L. Kanel, J. H. Klock, W. Michaelis, and R. Seifert. 2008. A novel, multi-layered methanotrophic microbial mat system growing on the sediment of the Black Sea. Environ. Microbiol. 10:1934-1947. [PubMed]
33. Lane, D. J. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p. 115-175. In E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
34. Lanoil, B. D., R. Sassen, M. T. La Duc, S. T. Sweet, and K. H. Nealson. 2001. Bacteria and archaea physically associated with Gulf of Mexico gas hydrates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5143-5153. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Leloup, J., A. Loy, N. J. Knab, C. Borowski, M. Wagner, and B. B. Jørgensen. 2007. Diversity and abundance of sulfate-reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea. Environ. Microbiol. 9:131-142. [PubMed]
36. Leloup, J., L. Quillet, T. Berthe, and F. Petit. 2006. Diversity of the dsrAB (dissimilatory sulfite reductase) gene sequences retrieved from two contrasting mudflats of the Seine estuary, France. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 55:230-238. [PubMed]
37. Lloyd, K. G., L. Lapham, and A. Teske. 2006. An anaerobic methane-oxidizing community of ANME-1b archaea in hypersaline Gulf of Mexico sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:7218-7230. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Lozupone, C., and R. Knight. 2005. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8228-8235. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Lozupone, C. A., M. Hamady, S. T. Kelley, and R. Knight. 2007. Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:1576-1585. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Ludwig, W., O. Strunk, R. Westram, L. Richter, H. Meier, Yadhukumar, A. Buchner, T. Lai, S. Steppi, G. Jobb, W. Forster, I. Brettske, S. Gerber, A. W. Ginhart, O. Gross, S. Grumann, S. Hermann, R. Jost, A. Konig, T. Liss, R. Lussmann, M. May, B. Nonhoff, B. Reichel, R. Strehlow, A. Stamatakis, N. Stuckmann, A. Vilbig, M. Lenke, T. Ludwig, A. Bode, and K.-H. Schleifer. 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1363-1371. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Luton, P. E., J. M. Wayne, R. J. Sharp, and P. W. Riley. 2002. The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology 148:3521-3530. [PubMed]
42. Marchesi, J. R., A. J. Weightman, B. A. Cragg, R. J. Parkes, and J. C. Fry. 2001. Methanogen and bacterial diversity and distribution in deep gas hydrate sediments from the Cascadia Margin as revealed by 16S rRNA molecular analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 34:221-228. [PubMed]
43. Mussmann, M., K. Ishii, R. Rabus, and R. Amann. 2005. Diversity and vertical distribution of cultured and uncultured Deltaproteobacteria in an intertidal mud flat of the Wadden Sea. Environ. Microbiol. 7:405-418. [PubMed]
44. Nauhaus, K., A. Boetius, M. Kruger, and F. Widdel. 2002. In vitro demonstration of anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to sulphate reduction in sediment from a marine gas hydrate area. Environ. Microbiol. 4:296-305. [PubMed]
45. Newberry, C. J., G. Webster, B. A. Cragg, R. J. Parkes, A. J. Weightman, and J. C. Fry. 2004. Diversity of prokaryotes and methanogenesis in deep subsurface sediments from the Nankai Trough, Ocean Drilling Program Leg 190. Environ. Microbiol. 6:274-287. [PubMed]
46. Niemann, H., T. Losekann, D. de Beer, M. Elvert, T. Nadalig, K. Knittel, R. Amann, E. J. Sauter, M. Schluter, and M. Klages. 2006. Novel microbial communities of the Haakon Mosby mud volcano and their role as a methane sink. Nature 443:854-858. [PubMed]
47. Niewohner, C., C. Hensen, S. Kasten, M. Zabel, and H. D. Schulz. 1998. Deep sulfate reduction completely mediated by anaerobic methane oxidation in sediments of the upwelling area off Namibia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 62:455-464.
48. Orphan, V. J., K. U. Hinrichs, W. Ussler III, C. K. Paull, L. T. Taylor, S. P. Sylva, J. M. Hayes, and E. F. DeLong. 2001. Comparative analysis of methane-oxidizing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in anoxic marine sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1922-1934. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Parkes, R. J., B. A. Cragg, N. Banning, F. Brock, G. Webster, J. C. Fry, E. Hornibrook, R. D. Pancost, S. Kelly, N. Knab, B. B. Jørgensen, J. Rinna, and A. J. Weightman. 2007. Biogeochemistry and biodiversity of methane cycling in subsurface marine sediments (Skagerrak, Denmark). Environ. Microbiol. 9:1146-1161. [PubMed]
50. Parkes, R. J., G. Webster, B. A. Cragg, A. J. Weightman, C. J. Newberry, T. G. Ferdelman, J. Kallmeyer, B. B. Jørgensen, I. W. Aiello, and J. C. Fry. 2005. Deep sub-seafloor prokaryotes stimulated at interfaces over geological time. Nature 436:390-394. [PubMed]
51. Phelps, C. D., L. J. Kerkhof, and L. Y. Young. 1998. Molecular characterization of a sulfate-reducing consortium which mineralizes benzene. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 27:269-279.
52. Polz, M. F., and C. M. Cavanaugh. 1998. Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3724-3730. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Purdy, K. J., T. M. Embley, and D. B. Nedwell. 2002. The distribution and activity of sulphate reducing bacteria in estuarine and coastal marine sediments. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81:181-187. [PubMed]
54. Ravenschlag, K., K. Sahm, J. Pernthaler, and R. Amann. 1999. High bacterial diversity in permanently cold marine sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:3982-3989. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Reeburgh, W. 1980. Anaerobic methane oxidation-rate depth distributions in Skan Bay sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 47:345-352.
56. Reed, D. W., Y. Fujita, M. E. Delwiche, D. B. Blackwelder, P. P. Sheridan, T. Uchida, and F. S. Colwell. 2002. Microbial communities from methane hydrate-bearing deep marine sediments in a forearc basin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:3759-3770. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Sorensen, K. B., and A. Teske. 2006. Stratified communities of active Archaea in deep marine subsurface sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:4596-4603. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
59. Tabatabai, M. A. 1974. Determination of sulfate in water samples. Sulphur Inst. J. 10:11-13.
60. Tamura, K., J. Dudley, M. Nei, and S. Kumar. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software, version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1596-1599. [PubMed]
61. Teske, A., K. U. Hinrichs, V. Edgcomb, A. de Vera Gomez, D. Kysela, S. P. Sylva, M. L. Sogin, and H. W. Jannasch. 2002. Microbial diversity of hydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin: evidence for anaerobic methanotrophic communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:1994-2007. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Thomsen, T. R., K. Finster, and N. B. Ramsing. 2001. Biogeochemical and molecular signatures of anaerobic methane oxidation in a marine sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1646-1656. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Treude, T., J. Niggemann, J. Kallmeyer, P. Wintersteller, C. J. Schubert, A. Boetius, and B. B. Jørgensen. 2005. Anaerobic oxidation of methane and sulfate reduction along the Chilean continental margin. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69:2767-2779.
64. Vetriani, C., H. W. Jannasch, B. J. MacGregor, D. A. Stahl, and A. L. Reysenbach. 1999. Population structure and phylogenetic characterization of marine benthic archaea in deep-sea sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4375-4384. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Wagner, M., A. Loy, M. Klein, N. Lee, N. B. Ramsing, D. A. Stahl, and M. W. Friedrich. 2005. Functional marker genes for identification of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes. Methods Enzymol. 397:469-489. [PubMed]
66. Webster, G., R. J. Parkes, B. A. Cragg, C. J. Newberry, A. J. Weightman, and J. C. Fry. 2006. Prokaryotic community composition and biogeochemical processes in deep subseafloor sediments from the Peru Margin. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 58:65-85. [PubMed]
67. Webster, G., R. J. Parkes, J. C. Fry, and A. J. Weightman. 2004. Widespread occurrence of a novel division of bacteria identified by 16S rRNA gene sequences originally found in deep marine sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5708-5713. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Webster, G., L. C. Watt, J. Rinna, J. C. Fry, R. P. Evershed, R. J. Parkes, and A. J. Weightman. 2006. A comparison of stable-isotope probing of DNA and phospholipid fatty acids to study prokaryotic functional diversity in sulfate-reducing marine sediment enrichment slurries. Environ. Microbiol. 8:1575-1589. [PubMed]
Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)