Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français |

**|**Bioinformation**|**v.3(7); 2009**|**PMC2655047

Formats

Article sections

Authors

Related links

Bioinformation. 2009; 3(7): 296–298.

Published online 2009 February 27.

PMCID: PMC2655047

Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA

Received 2009 January 22; Accepted 2009 February 5.

Copyright © 2009 Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group

This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited.

Richness is defined as the number of distinct species or classes in a sample or population. Although richness estimation is an important practice, it requires mathematical and computational methods that are challenging to understand and implement. We have developed a web server, RICHness ESTimator (RICHEST), which implements three non-parametric statistical methods for richness estimation. Its user-friendly web interface allows users to analyze and compare their data conveniently over the web.

A web server hosting RICHEST is accessible at http://richest.cgb.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/index.cgi and the software is freely available for local installations.

Characterizing biological diversity has been a longstanding interest among biologists. In particular, estimating species richness (i.e., the number of distinct plant, animal or microbial species) is important for understanding the structure of specific environmental niches. Because it is impractical to exhaustively survey entire ecosystems, such estimates must often be inferred from sampling, e.g., giventhe number of unique species identified from an initial random sample, how many new species are expected in an additional sample? It is not trivial to perform such estimations. First, it is still an active research area for statisticians to develop robust estimation methods. Biologists do not always have time to follow the latest statistical breakthroughs. Second, methods published by statisticians are not always implemented into convenientcomputer programs for biologists. Biologists are left with mathematical formulations that may be prohibitively complicated to use with their data. We have developed a web-based server, RICHness ESTimator (RICHEST),which implements sophisticated statistical methods for richness estimation. The intuitive web interface guidesusers to upload their data and easily perform their analyses.

We have identified three non‐parametric richness estimation methods: (i) a non‐parametric Bayesian method described by Lijoi et al. [1]; (ii) a Poisson non‐parametric maximum‐likelihood (PNPML) method, similar to Wang et al. [2]; paired with the rarefaction methodology [3]; and (iii) the Good‐Toumlin estimator [4]. We have chosen to focus on non‐parametric methods because they eliminate the need for assumptions about the underlying distribution. However, despite the elegant mathematics published in the Bayesian method, no computer program accompanies the publication. The computational instructions obtained directly from the authors (personal communication) are difficult to follow without significant computational expertise. For the PNPML method, Wang et al. [2] have already implemented it into a user‐friendly web‐based tool called ESTstat. However, the focus of the ESTstat web server is for analyzing EST data although users can also apply it for general species richness estimation. Other existing tools for richness estimation such as EstimateS [5] are desktop applications instead of web‐based servers.

To bridge the gap between the published statistical methods and the biologists wishing to apply the methods to their data, we have implemented all three methods in RICHEST using the R program for statistical computing. For the Bayesian method, the estimates are achieved by optimizing Pitman's sampling formula with respect to two parameters of a Poisson‐Dirichlet distribution. In our implementation, we have taken advantage of the smoothness of the function of Pitman's sampling formula to apply the Nelder‐Mead optimization technique [6]. The implementation of the PNPML method is similar to that of ESTstat [2], except that it does not implement a penalty function to constrain the population richness parameter. Instead, a user can specify some estimate of the richness of the population and use the method to estimate the richness of subsequent samples. When such information is not scientifically available, one strategy for using the PNPML method is to set the population richness estimate parameter to the Chao lower bound, which is automatically calculated by RICHEST when the data is loaded. The PNPML method uses an expectation‐maximization algorithm [7] to estimate the maximum‐likelihood species abundance distribution based on the non‐parametric Poisson mixture model, and it uses this estimated distribution to generate sample richness estimates by rarefaction. Finally, the classic Good‐Toulmin estimator was implemented as described in [4]. The web interface of RICHEST (Figure 1) is implemented with the Perl programming language.

We have validated the RICHEST tool by applying it to several data sets. Here, we describe a published microbial data set compiled by Schloss and Handelsman [8], in which total 690 16S rRNA sequences were extracted from the Sargasso Sea metagenome sequencing project [9] and clustered into 114 different microbial species based on sequence similarity. To validate the methods that we have integrated in RICHEST, we used a subset of the 16S rRNA sequences to predict richness of the whole microbial sample. For example, we randomly selected some 16S rRNA sequences and counted the number of microbial species in this subset; then we used the three methods to estimate the total number of predicted microbial species in all 690 16S rRNA sequences. That is, we asked whether our predictions would be close to what Schloss and Handelsman observed (i.e., 114 microbial species in total). Table 1 (under supplementary material) shows that our predictions are consistent with their observations. Our result also confirms the prediction by Lijoi et al that the Good‐Toulmin estimator provides reliable estimates for the species richness of an additional sample only if its size is not too large.

This work was supported in part by the Indiana METACyt Initiative of Indiana University, funded in part through a major grant from the Lilly Endowment, Inc. We would like to thank Drs. Esfandiar Haghverdi and Zhijun Wu for their helpful discussion on the RICHEST development. We also thank Chris Hemmerich for his assistance in the web server development. We are grateful to Dr. Rameses Mena for providing instructions on the implementation of the Bayesian method.

**Citation:**Durden & Dong, Bioinformation 3(7): 296-298 (2009)

1. Lijoi A, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:339. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

2. Wang JP, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:300. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

3. Tipper JC. Paleobiology. 1979;5:423.

4. Good IJ, Toulmin GH. Biometrika. 1956;43:45.

6. Nelder JA, Mead R. Comput J. 1965;7:308.

7. Liu Z, et al. Comp Stat & Data Anal. 2006;50:1052.

8. Schloss PD, et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:1501. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

9. Venter JC, et al. Science. 2004;304:66. [PubMed]

Articles from Bioinformation are provided here courtesy of **Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group**

PubMed Central Canada is a service of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) working in partnership with the National Research Council's Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information in cooperation with the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the U.S. National Library of Medicine(NCBI/NLM). It includes content provided to the PubMed Central International archive by participating publishers. |