PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan 1, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2650822
NIHMSID: NIHMS85907

Galanin preproprotein is associated with elevated plasma triglycerides

Abstract

Objective

There is increasing physiological evidence in rodents connecting the neuropeptide galanin to triglyceride (TG) levels. We hypothesized that variation in the galanin preproprotein (GAL) gene may contribute to hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) in humans.

Methods and Results

We investigated GAL as a TG candidate gene by genotyping four tagSNPs in Dutch, Finnish and Mexican familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) families as well as in Caucasian combined hyperlipidemia cases/controls (n=2,471). The common allele of rs2187331, residing in the promoter region of GAL, was significantly associated with HTG (p-value=0.00038). In an unascertained population sample of 4,463 Finnish males, the rare allele of rs2187331 was associated with higher TGs (p-value=0.0028−0.00016). We also observed an allele specific difference with rs2187331 in reporter gene expression and nuclear factor binding in vitro. Furthermore, we detected differential expression of many key lipid genes in adipose tissue based on rs2187331 genotypes.

Conclusions

The SNP rs2187331 is associated with HTG in FCHL and Caucasian combined hyperlipidemia cases/controls and influences TG levels in the population. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the allelic difference observed between FCHL and the general population. Functional evidence shows that rs2187331 has an allele specific cis-regulatory function and influences the expression of lipid related genes in adipose.

Elevated plasma lipid levels are key risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been able to account for 5−8% of the variation in the levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides (TGs)1. This suggests that there are other genetic variants affecting plasma lipid levels still to be discovered.

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL; MIM:144250) is the most common dyslipidemia observed in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and their relatives. FCHL is characterized by familial segregation of elevated plasma triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), or both2. Another common characteristic of FCHL is postprandial lipemia, the accumulation of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles (chylomicron, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and their remnants) in plasma approximately 6−10 hours after a fatty meal.

A recent study demonstrated a correlation between plasma TGs and transcript levels of the neuropeptide galanin preproprotein (GAL) in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus in rats fed a high-fat diet3. Furthermore, injection of GAL peptide directly onto the PVN of rats caused a significant upregulation of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) expression in adipose tissue and a significant decrease in LPL expression of skeletal muscle3, 4. As many as one third of FCHL patients are estimated to exhibit decreased LPL activity5, suggesting that perturbations in LPL may contribute to FCHL6.

We hypothesized that GAL is a compelling functional candidate gene for predisposition to elevated TGs in individuals with FCHL. Coincidentally, GAL is located near the peak marker linked to TGs and FCHL in Dutch and British FCHL families on chromosome 11p7, 8. We selected tagSNPs capturing the common genetic variation of GAL and tested these SNPs for association with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) in study samples ascertained for hyperlipidemia and with TG levels at the population level. We also tested for allelic effects on reporter gene expression, nuclear factor binding and downstream differential expression of genes including LPL. Our data suggest that variation in the GAL promoter region influences TG levels in humans and that the associated variant is likely to be functional.

Materials & Methods

Each subject involved in this study provided a written informed consent. The study design was approved by the ethics committees of the participating institutions.

Dutch, Finnish and Mexican FCHL families

A total of 565 individuals from 33 Dutch FCHL families were collected at the Utrecht Academic University Hospital7. A total of 724 individuals from 60 Finnish families were collected in the Helsinki and Turku University Hospitals9. A total of 806 individuals from 55 mexican FCHL families were collected at Instituto National de Ciencias Médicas Y Nutritión, Salvador Zubirán. HTG status was determined using the 90th age-sex specific population percentiles for TGs. Detailed information about the family collection and determination of the affection status can be found in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Caucasian combined hyperlipidemia case/controls

The Caucasian combined hyperlipidemia cases and controls were collected both at the Academic Hospital Maastricht and at the University of California San Francisco, as described previously10, 11. Combined hyperlipidemic status was specified as both TC and TG levels >90th age-sex specific population percentiles. The controls had TC and TG levels <75th age-sex specific population percentiles. Detailed information about the case/control definition can be found in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

METSIM subjects

The METSIM study is an ongoing population sample of Finnish males. A total of 4,463 males were included in this study (Supplementary Table 1). Further information about sample collection and quantitative trait measurements can be found in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

SNP selection, genotyping and sequencing

SNPs were selected to capture the common genetic variation in the GAL region (GAL coding region and 10Kbp up and downstream of the gene) using the CEPH HapMap Phase I genotype data and the haplotype tagging software LDSelect12 with the binning threshold set at r2 ≥0.85 and the minor allele frequency (MAF) filter set to ≥0.1. We identified three tagSNPs in the region (rs3136541, rs3181041 and rs6591350), and one singleton SNP (rs2187331) that was not in significant linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r2<0.85) with any other SNPs in the region. Genotyping and sequencing procedures are described in detail in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Statistical analyses

We utilized the Family Based Association Testing (FBAT) software package to test for association in families with HTG13. Logistic regression was used to test for association in the cases/controls using an additive model of inheritance in the statistical software package R. We performed a combined analysis of the family-based and case-control studies (n=2471) using the Z-method to combine the statistics for the 4 SNPs. Regression based analysis of the METSIM study utilized ANCOVA in R adjusting for age, BMI and smoking status (smoking or not). Power was calculated using QUANTO14. Additional details of the statistical analyses can be found in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Transient transfections and luciferase assay

A region of 564bp containing the SNP rs2187331 was amplified and cloned from genomic DNA template into the pGL3-Promoter vector (Promega). All experiments were carried out in HEK293T and HepG2 cells. The dual-luciferase reporter assay (Promega) was used according to manufacturer's protocol. Fourty-eight hours after transfection, cells in each well were lysed using 50μl passive lysis buffer and 15μl of the lysate was used for the assay. Detailed description of construct, transfection and experimental design can be found in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)

The nuclear proteins were extracted from the HepG2 and PANC-1 cell lines by NE-PER nuclear extraction reagents (Pierce) and protein concentrations were quantified by the Bradford assay. Complementary 5′ biotinylated and unlabeled oligonucleotide probes representing both alleles of rs2187331 were obtained commercially (Operon Biotechnologies). Specifics of EMSA can be found in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Microarrays and qRT-PCR

We collected 49 fat biopsies from umbilical subcutaneous adipose tissue under local anesthesia from unrelated Mexican FCHL cases/controls. Clinical characteristics are given in Supplementary Table 2. Microarray hybridization and qRT-PCR experiments are described in the Supplementary Material and Methods. The CEL files were imported into R 2.6.0 using the justRMA function of the Affymetrix library in Bioconductor, which does background subtraction and quantile normalization. The quality of each probe for every individual was assessed using the MAS 5.0 software from Affymetrix. The normalized relative expression of each gene was used as the dependent variable in linear regression with rs2187331 genotypes (TT=0, TC=1, CC=2) and the FCHL status as the independent variables using the anova and lm functions from the stats package in R. Pathway enrichment was conducted using the DAVID software package15. Microarray data can be accessed in MIAME compliant format from GEO (GSE13506).

Results

Association of GAL SNPs with elevated TGs

We genotyped four tagSNPs (rs2187331, rs3136541, rs3181041, rs6591350) covering GAL and tested them for association with HTG in both the FCHL families and combined hyperlipidemia cases/controls (n=2471) (Table 1). We observed an association with HTG in the combined hyperlipidemia cases/controls for the common allele T of rs2187331 (p-value=0.0015). The FCHL families showed a trend in the same direction (p-value=0.063). Combining the association results from the combined hyperlipidemia cases/controls and the FCHL families increased the significance (p-value=0.00038, n=2,471). The 12 tests conducted would require a Bonferroni corrected p-value of ≤0.0042 to maintain an experiment-wide type I error rate of 0.05. The association detected in the combined analysis of rs2187331 (p-value=0.00038) is thus considered experiment-wide significant. We did not observe a sex-specific effect for rs2187331 in the combined analysis when analyzing males and females separately (male p-value=0.011, female p-value=0.014), and the same allele was associated in both sexes (male Z=−2.53, female Z=−2.45). We did not observe any association with TC in the families (p-value>0.1).

Table 1
Association results of tagSNPs in the GAL region for HTG (TG≥90th age-sex specific population percentile) in the hyperlipidemic study samples.

Functional evidence for rs2187331

The SNP rs2187331 is located 5.6Kbp upstream of the GAL transcriptional start and is not in significant LD (r2>0.85) with any other SNPs in the region. Therefore, we hypothesized that rs2187331 may be the causal SNP and likely functions in a regulatory role. To test this hypothesis, we cloned a 564bp-region surrounding rs2187331 into a luciferase reporter gene vector and assayed for allele specific expression in the human HEK293T (embryonic kidney) cell line. This cell line was selected because GAL expression was detected in both kidney tissue and the HEK293T cell line (Supplementary Figure 1), and also because it is easy to transfect. We found that the region containing the SNP rs2187331 functions as a regulatory element, because the T allele had higher expression than the C allele (p-value=0.017, T:C fold-change=1.53) (Figure 1). This effect was also observed when the insert was cloned in the opposite orientation (data not shown). We also observed the same effect in the hepatic HepG2 cell line (data not shown). Next we assayed for allele specific nuclear-factor binding with 31-mer double-stranded oligos, representing the two rs2187331 alleles using EMSA with nuclear extract from PANC-1 (pancreatic) and HepG2 (hepatic) cell lines (Figure 2). GAL was found to be expressed in both pancreas and the PANC-1 cell line (Supplementary Figure 1). We observed a similar allele specific binding difference in both cell lines (Figure 2). These data demonstrate that the alleles of rs2187331 alter the rate of transcription and affect differential binding of nuclear-factors in vitro.

Figure 1
Comparison of luciferase reporter gene expression between the two alleles of rs2187331 (C and T) in the pGL3-Promoter vector in the HEK293T cell line. Luciferase intensity of the C allele is significantly lower than the T allele (p-value=0.017). The T ...
Figure 2
EMSA showing the differential binding of nuclear factors to the C and T alleles of rs2187331 in a 31bp double stranded oligo. The observed allelic effect is indicated by the black arrowhead. Three different experimental conditions were tested for each ...

Genes differentially expressed based on rs2187331 genotypes

The expression of GAL was too low to be accurately quantified by qRT-PCR (CT values > 30) in the Mexican FCHL fat biopsies. However, it is known that LPL transcript levels in adipose tissue are sensitive to GAL peptide levels in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus in rats3, 4. We hypothesized that LPL and other downstream genes may be differentially expressed based on rs2187331 genotypes. We analyzed 49 Mexican FCHL fat biopsies for differential expression by regressing rs2187331 genotypes on the normalized gene expression and adjusting for case/control status. We identified 1,884 differentially expressed probe sets with a p-value <0.05 (corresponding to 1,667 genes). Importantly, we found LPL to be differentially expressed with two independent probes sets (p-values=0.0052−0.0063). Using qRT-PCR we validated the differential expression of LPL and hormone sensitive lipase (LIPE) (Supplementary Figure 2). Interestingly, higher expression in the TT genotype carriers was observed for 77% of the 1,884 probes identified as differentially expressed based on rs2187331 genotypes (p-value<0.05) (Supplementary Table 6), suggesting that the direction of differential expression is important. The set of differentially expressed genes was significantly enriched for GO terms related to lipid metabolism (Benjamini corrected p-value<0.05) (Table 2). A subset of interesting lipid genes that were differentially expressed are shown in Supplementary Table 3 (p-value<0.05). Importantly, the same pathways that were identified in the DAVID analyses were also identified when the analysis included FCHL status, sex, age, and BMI as covariates (data not shown). These data suggest that rs2187331 genotypes influence expression of multiple genes of lipid metabolism in adipose, a tissue known to be responsive to GAL levels in the hypothalamus.

Table 2
Gene Ontology (GO) biological process term enrichment (Benjamini Corrected p-value<0.1) from genes the expression of which is dependent on rs2187331 genotypes.

Resequencing of GAL coding regions

We resequenced the coding regions of GAL in 13 unrelated Dutch FCHL family members who had elevated plasma TGs (>90th age-sex-percentiles), and who were homozygous for the T allele of rs2187331. In addition we resequenced ~250bp upstream and downstream of the rs2187331. We did not detect any novel sequence variants in significant LD, defined as r2>0.85 that could explain the association with TG in the coding region of GAL (NM_015973.3). The variants identified through resequencing are presented in Supplementary Table 4, and the primers used for resequencing are listed in Supplementary Table 5.

Investigation of GAL SNPs at the population level

We tested for association between quantitative TGs and the two SNPs with a p-value <0.10 in the study samples ascertained for hyperlipidemia (rs2187331 and rs3181041) in an unascertained population-based sample of 4,463 males from Kuopio, Finland (Table 3). We observed an association between the rare C allele of rs2187331 and high levels of plasma TGs in the total study sample (p-value=0.0028−0.00016) (Table 3). We did not observe an association with LDLC or TC in the METSIM (p-values>0.1). In the non-statin users (n=3963), the p-value was borderline significant (p=0.026−0.019), and no association was observed in T2DM subjects (n=658) (Table 3). These findings are in line with the recent meta analysis of quantitative lipid phenotypes of type 2 diabetes (T2D) genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that did not identify rs2187331 as significantly associated with TGs (p-value=0.057)1. Nor were there any genome-wide significant signals within 500Kbp of GAL (minimum p-value = 0.0095 for TGs). This meta-analysis included diabetic cases and excluded individuals on lipid-lowering therapy, primarily statins.

Table 3
Association of rs2187331 and rs3181041 with logTGs in METSIM study.

For the analysis of diabetics, we calculated that we have 89% power to detect an association while maintaining a type I error rate of 0.05 with the given sample size (n=658) and an additive model. In this power calculation, we used the same effect size as observed in the total METSIM study for TGs. It is worth noting that there are only 16 subjects with combined hyperlipidemia when using the TC and TG 90th age-sex specific Finnish population percentiles in the non-statin user group, preventing an actual replication analysis with rs2187331. To conclude, we observed an effect of rs2187331 on TGs in an unascertained study sample of Finnish males. This effect is confounded by lipid-lowering therapy and diabetes.

Discussion

We observed that the T allele of rs2187331 residing in a putative regulatory region upstream of GAL is experiment-wide significantly associated with HTG in the combined analysis of FCHL families and combined hyperlipidemia cases/controls. In a non-ascertained population sample, the C allele of rs2187331 was associated with higher levels of TGs. We also provide evidence for the functional relevance of rs2187331 by demonstrating allelic differences in reporter gene expression, nuclear factor binding and expression of lipid metabolism related genes, including LPL, a known downstream target of GAL. These data demonstrate an association to a clinically relevant trait, a plausible mechanism by which this SNP may functionally alter GAL expression, and allelic differential expression of genes that are likely to play a role in the increased susceptibility for HTG.

We observed that LPL and many other lipid metabolism related genes are differentially expressed based on rs2187331 genotypes. Furthermore, 77% of these genes show higher expression with the TT genotype. This is consistent with data in rats where GAL was found to regulate LPL expression both in adipose and muscle3, 4. Interestingly, not only genes from the anabolic fat storage pathway have higher expression with the TT genotype (CD36, FATP1, LPL, VLDLR), but also genes from the catabolic pathway (ATGL, LIPE, MGLL). The molecular mechanism(s) underlying the coregulation of these genes will need to be investigated in future studies.

We found the C allele of rs2187331 associated with higher levels of TGs in the population-based METSIM study, whereas in samples ascertained for hyperlipidemia the T allele was associated with HTG. Approximately 10% of the METSIM individuals were taking statins and only 16 of the non-statin users had combined hyperlipidemia. Also 15% of the METSIM study are diabetic. The sample sizes of the HTG (n=2,471) and population (n=4,463) studies make it less likely that either finding is by chance alone. Furthermore, the functional evidence supports a regulative, allele-specific role of rs2187331. Moreover, ultimately an individual's risk to develop a complex cardiovascular trait is a combination of susceptibility variants, environmental factors, behavior and chance. The combination of variants and environmental factors are likely to differ between subjects with HTG and subjects representing the unascertained general population, thus contributing to these types of allelic differences. The difference in direction of the association between the METSIM and hyperlipidemic study samples could be due to these confounding factors (i.e. statins and diabetes status), and will have to be further investigated in independent study samples with refined quantitative phenotypes and highly detailed life style variables. Extensive resequencing of the entire genomic region of GAL in different study populations is also warranted to further explore the possibility that differences in LD structure and/or several functional variants and their interactions with rs2187331 may contribute to the disparity in the association signal.

Originally it was observed that injection of nanomolar levels of GAL peptide onto the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus stimulates feeding16. Subsequent genetic evidence from GAL knockout mice suggests that GAL plays a role in fat intake and preference17-19. Interestingly, a positive correlation was also observed between plasma glucose and circulating levels of galanin peptide in healthy and type 2 diabetic individuals20, 21. However, the inhibition of insulin secretion identified in other mammals was not observed in humans given a bolus of either porcine or human galanin22, 23. Variation near the GAL gene has previously been associated with alcoholism and anxiety24, whereas obesity studies have not yielded significant findings for GAL25, 26.

In normolipidemic individuals plasma TG levels are increased following the consumption of a high fat meal. In response to the elevated plasma TG levels, GAL expression is up-regulated in the PVN3, which in turn signals the up-regulation of genes involved in the lipolysis of TGs from triglyceride rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and import of free fatty acids for storage in adipose tissue. A secondary effect of lipolysis of TGs from TRLs is a reduction in the level of plasma TGs due to a relocation of TGs from plasma into another tissue. We hypothesize that in response to postprandial elevated plasma TGs individuals with HTG carrying the C allele of rs2187331 will have decreased expression or reduced upregulation of GAL in the PVN, which modifies the upregulation of lipolysis and storage related genes in adipose tissue.

In conclusion, our data suggest that rs2187331 residing in a putative regulatory region upstream of GAL contributes to hypertriglyceridemia in FCHL, TG levels in the general population, and has an allele-specific cis-regulatory function.

Supplementary Material

Supp. File 1

Supp. Table 6

Acknowledgements

We thank the individuals that participated in this study. We thank E. Nikkola and M. Lupsakko for laboratory technical assistance.

Sources of Funding

This study was funded by National Institutes of Health (HL-28481, HL082762); American Heart Association (072523Y to A.H.-V., 0465005Y to B.E.A.); National Human Genome Research Institute (T32 HG02536 to C.L.P., and D.W.-V.); Academy of Finland (to M.K.); Clinical Research Institute HUCH Ltd (to M-R.T.); and Finnish Heart Foundation (to M-R.T.).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is an un-copyedited author manuscript that was accepted for publication in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, copyright The American Heart Association. This may not be duplicated or reproduced, other than for personal use or within the “Fair Use of Copyrighted Materials” (section 107, title 17, U.S. Code) without prior permission of the copyright owner, The American Heart Association. The final copyedited article, which is the version of record, can be found at http://atvb.ahajournals.org. The American Heart Association disclaims any responsibility or liability for errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or in any version derived from it by the National Institutes of Health or other parties.

Disclosure

None of the authors have a financial interest related to this work. Dr. Tjerk W.A. de Bruin has been employed by GlaxoSmithKline. This work was not supported in full or part by GlaxoSmithKline.

References

1. Willer CJ, Sanna S, Jackson AU, Scuteri A, Bonnycastle LL, Clarke R, Heath SC, Timpson NJ, Najjar SS, Stringham HM, Strait J, Duren WL, Maschio A, Busonero F, Mulas A, Albai G, Swift AJ, Morken MA, Narisu N, Bennett D, Parish S, Shen H, Galan P, Meneton P, Hercberg S, Zelenika D, Chen WM, Li Y, Scott LJ, Scheet PA, Sundvall J, Watanabe RM, Nagaraja R, Ebrahim S, Lawlor DA, Ben-Shlomo Y, Davey-Smith G, Shuldiner AR, Collins R, Bergman RN, Uda M, Tuomilehto J, Cao A, Collins FS, Lakatta E, Lathrop GM, Boehnke M, Schlessinger D, Mohlke KL, Abecasis GR. Newly identified loci that influence lipid concentrations and risk of coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40:161–169. [PubMed]
2. Goldstein JL, Schrott HG, Hazzard WR, Bierman EL, Motulsky AG. Hyperlipidemia in coronary heart disease. II. Genetic analysis of lipid levels in 176 families and delineation of a new inherited disorder, combined hyperlipidemia. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:1544–1568. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Leibowitz SF, Dourmashkin JT, Chang GQ, Hill JO, Gayles EC, Fried SK, Wang J. Acute high-fat diet paradigms link galanin to triglycerides and their transport and metabolism in muscle. Brain Res. 2004;1008:168–178. [PubMed]
4. Yun R, Dourmashkin JT, Hill J, Gayles EC, Fried SK, Leibowitz SF. PVN galanin increases fat storage and promotes obesity by causing muscle to utilize carbohydrate more than fat. Peptides. 2005;26:2265–2273. [PubMed]
5. Babirak SP, Brown BG, Brunzell JD. Familial combined hyperlipidemia and abnormal lipoprotein lipase. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:1176–1183. [PubMed]
6. Hoffer MJ, Bredie SJ, Boomsma DI, Reymer PW, Kastelein JJ, de Knijff P, Demacker PN, Stalenhoef AF, Havekes LM, Frants RR. The lipoprotein lipase (Asn291-->Ser) mutation is associated with elevated lipid levels in families with familial combined hyperlipidaemia. Atherosclerosis. 1996;119:159–167. [PubMed]
7. Aouizerat BE, Allayee H, Cantor RM, Davis RC, Lanning CD, Wen PZ, Dallinga-Thie GM, de Bruin TW, Rotter JI, Lusis AJ. A genome scan for familial combined hyperlipidemia reveals evidence of linkage with a locus on chromosome 11. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:397–412. [PubMed]
8. Naoumova RP, Bonney SA, Eichenbaum-Voline S, Patel HN, Jones B, Jones EL, Amey J, Colilla S, Neuwirth CK, Allotey R, Seed M, Betteridge DJ, Galton DJ, Cox NJ, Bell GI, Scott J, Shoulders CC. Confirmed locus on chromosome 11p and candidate loci on 6q and 8p for the triglyceride and cholesterol traits of combined hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:2070–2077. [PubMed]
9. Pajukanta P, Porkka KV, Antikainen M, Taskinen MR, Perola M, Murtomaki-Repo S, Ehnholm S, Nuotio I, Suurinkeroinen L, Lahdenkari AT, Syvanen AC, Viikari JS, Ehnholm C, Peltonen L. No evidence of linkage between familial combined hyperlipidemia and genes encoding lipolytic enzymes in Finnish families. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:841–850. [PubMed]
10. Wung SF, Kulkarni MV, Pullinger CR, Malloy MJ, Kane JP, Aouizerat BE. The lipoprotein lipase gene in combined hyperlipidemia: evidence of a protective allele depletion. Lipids Health Dis. 2006;5:19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Mar R, Pajukanta P, Allayee H, Groenendijk M, Dallinga-Thie G, Krauss RM, Sinsheimer JS, Cantor RM, de Bruin TW, Lusis AJ. Association of the APOLIPOPROTEIN A1/C3/A4/A5 gene cluster with triglyceride levels and LDL particle size in familial combined hyperlipidemia. Circ Res. 2004;94:993–999. [PubMed]
12. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Yi Q, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:106–120. [PubMed]
13. Horvath S, Xu X, Laird NM. The family based association test method: strategies for studying general genotype--phenotype associations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9:301–306. [PubMed]
14. Gauderman WJ. Sample size requirements for association studies of gene-gene interaction. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:478–484. [PubMed]
15. Sherman BT, Huang da W, Tan Q, Guo Y, Bour S, Liu D, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC, Lempicki RA. DAVID Knowledgebase: a gene-centered database integrating heterogeneous gene annotation resources to facilitate high-throughput gene functional analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:426. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Kyrkouli SE, Stanley BG, Leibowitz SF. Galanin: stimulation of feeding induced by medial hypothalamic injection of this novel peptide. Eur J Pharmacol. 1986;122:159–160. [PubMed]
17. Smith BK, Berthoud HR, York DA, Bray GA. Differential effects of baseline macronutrient preferences on macronutrient selection after galanin, NPY, and an overnight fast. Peptides. 1997;18:207–211. [PubMed]
18. Tempel DL, Leibowitz KJ, Leibowitz SF. Effects of PVN galanin on macronutrient selection. Peptides. 1988;9:309–314. [PubMed]
19. Adams AC, Clapham JC, Wynick D, Speakman JR. Feeding behaviour in galanin knockout mice supports a role of galanin in fat intake and preference. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20:199–206. [PubMed]
20. Legakis I, Mantzouridis T, Mountokalakis T. Positive correlation of galanin with glucose in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:759–760. [PubMed]
21. Legakis IN, Mantzouridis T, Mountokalakis T. Positive correlation of galanin with glucose in healthy volunteers during an oral glucose tolerance test. Horm Metab Res. 2007;39:53–55. [PubMed]
22. Gilbey SG, Stephenson J, O'Halloran DJ, Burrin JM, Bloom SR. High-dose porcine galanin infusion and effect on intravenous glucose tolerance in humans. Diabetes. 1989;38:1114–1116. [PubMed]
23. Holst JJ, Bersani M, Hvidberg A, Knigge U, Christiansen E, Madsbad S, Harling H, Kofod H. On the effects of human galanin in man. Diabetologia. 1993;36:653–657. [PubMed]
24. Belfer I, Hipp H, McKnight C, Evans C, Buzas B, Bollettino A, Albaugh B, Virkkunen M, Yuan Q, Max MB, Goldman D, Enoch MA. Association of galanin haplotypes with alcoholism and anxiety in two ethnically distinct populations. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11:301–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Kofler B, Lapsys N, Furler SM, Klaus C, Shine J, Iismaa TP. A polymorphism in the 3' region of the human preprogalanin gene. Mol Cell Probes. 1998;12:431–432. [PubMed]
26. Schauble N, Reichwald K, Grassl W, Bechstein H, Muller HC, Scherag A, Geller F, Utting M, Siegfried W, Goldschmidt H, Blundell J, Lawton C, Alam R, Whybrow S, Stubbs J, Platzer M, Hebebrand J, Hinney A. Human galanin (GAL) and galanin 1 receptor (GALR1) variations are not involved in fat intake and early onset obesity. J Nutr. 2005;135:1387–1392. [PubMed]