PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Infect Dis Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC Dec 1, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2649024
NIHMSID: NIHMS79157
GYNECOLOGIC ISSUES IN THE HIV-INFECTED WOMAN
Helen E. Cejtin, M.D., Attending Physician, Assistant Professor
Helen E. Cejtin, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County (formerly Cook County Hospital), 1901 W. Harrison, Chicago, IL 60612, Chicago Medical School, Home address: 1935 W. Farwell, Chicago, IL 60626, Phone:773-761-7763, Page: 312-400-5326, Email: hcejtin/at/gmail.com;
With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), women living with HIV can now enjoy longer lifespans in relative good health as well as the prospect of bearing children with an overwhelmingly low risk of vertical transmission. Thus, increasingly, seropositive women are now facing issues around longevity as well as those associated with fertility. The clinician caring for the HIV-infected woman must be alert to the gynecologic issues that are prevalent in this population. Among those faced by the gynecologist are menstrual abnormalities, lower genital tract neoplasia, sexually transmitted infections, the need for gynecologic surgery, and menopausal issues including osteopenia/osteoporosis. Contraception in HIV seropositive women presents unique management issues, because of the necessity for a dual role of prevention of both pregnancy and HIV transmission, the possible effect of birth control on HIV infection, and the interaction between birth control and HIV therapies. With ever increasing frequency, the gynecologist will be presented with the seropositive woman or couple who wishes to conceive. The purpose of this chapter is to review the current knowledge on the relationship between HIV infection and menstrual abnormalities, genital neoplasias, contraceptive options, surgical complications, and menopause with its associated disorders. Special considerations in the seropositive woman contemplating pregnancy will also be discussed. The treatment of pelvic infections is discussed elsewhere in this volume, and only changes in standard therapy because of concurrent HIV-infection will be discussed here.
HIV infected women frequently report changes in their menstrual cycles (1), and early reports suggested an increase in abnormal menses in this population (2,3). HIV infected women may have menstrual dysfunction for a variety of reasons which are not directly related to their disease. In the United States, women infected with HIV are disproportionately poor and have an increased frequency of illicit drug use (4), which may cause amenorrhea. One study demonstrated that low socioeconomic class itself is associated with a higher frequency of amenorrhea (5). Co-morbid conditions such as psychiatric illness and the subsequent use of psychotropic drugs may cause amenorrhea as well. HIV-seropositive women are exposed to multiple stressors (6), a phenomenon known to cause amenorrhea by increasing levels of corticotropin-releasing factor, which subsequently reduces gonadotropin-releasing hormone (7). The thrombocytopenia that is sometimes associated with HIV infection (8,9), or with some antiretroviral therapy such as Indinavir (10) may be associated with menorrhagia or metrorrhagia. Menstrual abnormalities are common with associated conditions such as renal insufficiency (11), and amenorrhea is often seen in conjunction with liver disease (12). A recent report of a 14-year-old girl started on HAART and followed with sequential ultrasounds demonstrated the development of polycystic ovaries onographically along with amenorrhea, acne and hirstuitism 56 weeks after starting therapy (13). Lastly, severe weight loss from any cause, prevalent in one third of HIV-positive patients in one longitudinal study (14), can result in amenorrhea.
Although amenorrhea is a common result from many of the conditions associated with HIV infection, it is much harder to answer the question of whether or not HIV infection in the absence of severe disease or weight loss is associated with amenorrhea. Grinspoon (15) studied 31 HIV-infected women who retrospectively reported their menses. The prevalence of amenorrhea in this group was 20%, compared to the background rate of 5% in the general population (16). This rate went up to 38% in women who were at less than 90% ideal body weight, clearly demonstrating an association between wasting and amenorrhea. Amenorrhea was associated with a decrease in muscle mass and serum estradiol levels, and was noted in 17% of the women without wasting. Chirgwin studied 248 seropositive women without AIDS and matched them with 82 seronegative controls (16). A significant increase in amenorrhea was noted in the HIV-infected women compared with controls (5% and 0% respectively) when controlling for age, substance use, and race, yet the prevalence of amenorrhea in the seropositive women was equal to that reported in the normal population. On multivariate analysis, there was no association between amenorrhea and CD4 cell count or category B symptoms (17). Interestingly, a decrease in premenstrual symptoms among HIV infected women was reported, which was felt to be due to an increase in anovulatory cycles. Other studies show no association between HIV serostatus and amenorrhea (18, 19). Among these is a large prospective study using menstrual diaries (20). In this study 802 seropositive and 273 seronegative women were compared while controlling for body mass index (BMI), substance use, and age. No difference in amenorrhea was found between HIV-seropositive and seronegative women, with a prevalence that was very low in both groups. There was a trend toward shorter cycles and more cycle variability among seropositive women with high viral loads and low CD4 cell counts. A study comparing women with CD4 cell counts between 200 and 500 cells/µl to women with CD4 cell counts under 100 cells/µl demonstrated a prevalence of amenorrhea of 9% and 19% respectively, illustrating an association between immunosuppression and amenorrhea, at least at the more severe end of the spectrum (21).
Because of a large body of literature on low testosterone levels and hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction in HIV-infected men (22,23,24), parallel losses in ovarian function have been postulated in women. A decrease in testosterone levels has been demonstrated in HIV-positive women, even in the absence of wasting (15,25), and HIV infection is one of the known causes for the female androgen deficiency syndrome (26). Studies of ovulatory function in HIV-seropositive women have mixed results. While anovulatory cycles are reported to occur in 5–31% of healthy women with regular menses (27,28), they were reported in 48% of HIV-infected women in one small study, with a trend to occur more in women with low CD4 cell counts (29). Another small study reported anovulatory cycles in almost one third of HIV-positive women reporting normal menses (30), but a larger study of 55 HIV-infected and 10 negative controls reported ovulatory cycles in 96% of the seropositive and 78% of the seronegative women (31). At present it appears that HIV-positive women with regular menses do not have more anovulatory cycles than the general population, although good studies are lacking.
There is some literature to support HIV infection as a cause of premature ovarian failure. One study suggests an increase in serum FSH levels in seropositive women when compared to controls (25), and a study of 24 HIV-positive women aged 20–42 years reported a serum FSH level consistent with menopause in 8% (29). Menopause may be difficult to ascertain in this population because of amenorrhea secondary to wasting, and confusion between climacteric symptoms and manifestations of coincident illness such as tuberculosis or side effects of drugs such as Efavirenz (10). In one study of 1130 seropositive and 292 HIV negative primarily African American women smokers, serum FSH was drawn and menstrual history was obtained every six months. Menopause was defined as amenorrhea for one year and a serum FSH of >25mIU/ml. The mean age of menopause was 47 years, regardless of serostatus, although the odds ratio of menopause if one was HIV seroinfected was 2.34(CI 0.63, 8.75). Over half of women with HIV and prolonged amenorrhea had a serum FSH in the premenopausal range (32), demonstrating that menopause is very difficult to ascertain in this group by the traditional WHO definition of amenorrhea for one year (WHO). This same group of women was asked if they were menopausal or not, and so were their clinicians. The women were more often correct about their menopausal status than their clinicians were (33). One study of women with a high prevalence of cocaine and heroin use and no confirmatory endocrine studies demonstrated a mean age of menopause (WHO definition) at age 43, with HIV infection and low CD4 count significantly associated with menopause (34). In contrast, a study in a similar population who were menstruating examined day 1–3 FSH, inhibin, and Mullerian Inhibiting Substance as markers of ovarian reserve. Levels were equal in seropositive and negative women controlling for age, supporting the notion that HIV infection does not affect ovarian reserve or cause ovarian failure (35). The effect, if any, of menopause on HIV infection is unknown, but a study of 382 HIV infected women with a known date of seroconversion compared CD4 counts between pre- and postmenopausal women. There was a trend toward lower CD4 counts in postmenopausal women (36). Menopausal HIV-infected women demonstrate a higher number of climacteric symptoms, most commonly psychological, vasomotor, and genitourinary symptoms (37,38).
In summary, although a significant proportion of HIV-infected women may be experiencing amenorrhea, HIV infection alone may not be responsible without coexisting conditions or with advanced degrees of immunosuppression or weight loss. The workup of amenorrhea in an HIV-infected woman should be similar to that in the general population. Serum FSH may be useful in making the diagnosis of menopause if this condition is suspected because of prolonged amenorrhea.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 1993, made invasive cervical cancer an AIDS-defining condition (17), and moderate and severe dysplasia were included on the list of conditions whose course or management may be complicated by HIV infection (category B conditions). These changes were made in response to the growing body of research in the early 1990’s demonstrating that HIV-infected women have an increased prevalence of cervical dysplasia (39, 40, 41, 42), although a similar association with cervical cancer has not been clearly proven (43, 44). An association between cervical cancer precursors and immunosuppression in organ transplant patients has been known for some time (45, 46, 47), but the association in HIV-infected women is probably even greater. Seropositive women may have the shared risk factor of multiple sexual partners leading to an increase in Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection in addition to the immunosuppression associated with HIV infection.
The increased prevalence of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) in HIV-infected women has been demonstrated repeatedly, in studies using cervical histology as well as cytology (43,48, 49, 50, 51 52, 53). A meta-analysis of 15 studies demonstrated an odds ratio of having cervical neoplasias of 8.8 for HIV-infected women, with the risk “likely increasing” with immunosuppression (54). Two large U.S. multicenter cohort studies, the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) and the HIV Epidemiology Research Study (HERS), have both demonstrated a prevalence of SILs on cytology in the 17–18% range for HIV-infected women and the 3–5% range for a seronegative control population with similar risk factors (50,55). The seropositive women had an additional 18–21% prevalence of Atypical Squamous Cells of Unknown Significance (ASCUS) cytology, and, interestingly, they had an extremely low prevalence of high grade SILs and cancer, less than 3% in both cohorts. One small study of adolescents perinatally infected with HIV demonstrated a 47.5% incidence of abnormal cytology, including predominantly LSIL in this group (56). When serum retinol levels were assayed in 1314 women, an increase in SILs was associated with retinol deficiency (57). However, a review of the effect of retinoids on SILs concluded that they are well-tolerated but that they are not effective in causing regression of CIN 3 or preventing progression of any grade of CIN. They may, however, have some effect on regression of CIN 2 (58). In most studies the prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology and histology is associated independently with the degree of immunosuppression (40,41,43,59,60,61,62). In the HERS, HIV-infected women with a CD4 count ≥500 cells/µl had a prevalence of SIL equivalent to that in seronegative controls (55), and women whose CD4 counts were ≤100cells/µl demonstrated a prevalence of low grade SILs and high grade SILs as high as 27% and 11% respectively (63).
It has been demonstrated in cohorts with a significant follow-up period that the increased risk of SILs persists over time, and the incidence of new histologically confirmed lesions was 20% in HIV-infected, and 5% in uninfected women in 3 years, with most of the increase in infected women coming from low grade SILs (64). Similar results were obtained cytologically in another cohort, and in both studies the incidence of high grade lesions remained low over time. The risk of incident SILs was dependent on HIV serostatus, HPV serostatus, CD4 cell count, and HIV RNA level (65). A recent study demonstrated an additional risk factor for SILs. They reported an increase in the detection of SILs among HIV seropositive and negative women who demonstrated cutaneous anergy when tested with Candida, tetanus, and mumps. Anergy is demonstrative of a decreased level of local cellular immune response (66).
In a large cohort study, progression to a more severe sytology in 6 months was demonstrated in 14% of the seropositive women and in only 7% of the HIV-negative women, and in a multivariate analysis only HPV serostatus and HIV-RNA were risk factors for progression. Regression without treatment in 6 months to a less severe cytology was common in both groups, however, occurring in 43% of HIV-positive and 66% of HIV-negative women. Regression, like progression, depended on HPV serostatus and HIV-RNA, but was also independently associated with CD4 cell counts. It is of note that neither progression nor regression was associated with HIV serostatus per se (65).
In an effort to understand the natural history of CIN 1 in women with HIV, 223 predominantly seropositive women and seronegative controls with CIN 1 were followed with serial cytology for a mean of 3.3 person-years. Progression occurred infrequently, and only in the seropositive women in the study. Regression occurred in 33% of the HIV-infected women, while the CIN 1 regressed in 67% of the controls. Regression was negatively associated with HPV and Latina race (67). Thus, in women living with HIV/AIDS most CIN 1 lesions will neither regress nor progress.
Although HAART may be expected to decrease SILs by restoring immune competence, it may conversely increase SILs by prolonging life and increasing the exposure time to HPV. Some studies show that there has not been a decrease in the incidence of cervical carcinoma since common use of HAART began (68, 69), and only a small, non-significant increase in survival from cervical cancer has occurred in the HAART era as compared to previously (70). The effect of HAART on cervical and other malignancies remains incompletely understood (71). One small study of HIV-infected women with normal cytology at baseline demonstrated a non-significant decreased incidence of SILs in women on HAART when compared to untreated women (26.1% and 42.3% respectively) (72). Other uncontrolled studies show a high rate of regression of SILs in women after being placed on HAART (73,74). One prospective trial of HIV-infected women with SILs at baseline demonstrated equivalent rates of progression and regression if taking no therapy, reverse transcriptase inhibitors, or HAART (75). Yet another large study demonstrated a significant increase in regression and decrease in progression with HAART (76). The effect of HAART on SILs is likely mediated through immune reconstitution, but some propose an additional direct antiviral effect of HAART on HPV (73,74). A more recent study demonstrates that although regression is dependent on HAART and the associated increase in CD4 count, most lesions in women on HAART do not regress (77).
HPV infection is the major cause of cervical dysplasia, and in HIV-negative women, it appears that most of the demographic and behavioral risks associated with SILs are entirely mediated through an increased prevalence of HPV (78). HPV is clearly associated with HIV infection, but this association has been difficult to elucidate. Several longitudinal studies of HPV infection have demonstrated that HIV-infected women are more likely than HIV-negative women to have cervical HPV of all types: low risk types (6,11,26,40,53,54,55,66,83,84), medium risk types (33,35,39,51,52,56,58,59,68,73,82), and high risk types (16,18,31,45), more likely to have persistence of cervical HPV over time, and more likely to have a high viral signal of their HPV. Moreover HPV persistence is associated with CD4 counts <200 cells/µl, and the presence of HPV is associated with an increase in progression and decrease in regression (55,65,79,80). HPV is thought to be more associated with SILs than HIV infection alone. In fact, in women who are dually infected with HIV and HPV, SILs are felt to be 72.3% attributable to HPV infection and only 21.1% attributable to HIV infection in one analysis (55). Prevalence of any HPV type in the WIHS and HERS cohorts is approximately 65% in seropositive and 30% in seronegative women (55,65). When sera from women in these two cohorts were assayed for IgG to HPV-16 capsids, HIV-infected women were significantly more likely than HIV-negative women to have a positive HPV-16 serology, with a prevalence of 53–56%. Positive HPV-16 serology was strongly associated with the lifetime number of sex partners in all women. HIV-positive women had a prevalence of cervical HPV-16 by PCR of only 5–6%, suggesting that reactivation of HPV-16 is uncommon, and that HPV replication is controlled at the cervix even in immunocompromised women (81). A more recent study demonstrated that incident HPV infections occur even in women who are not sexually active, indicating that reactivation and/or autoinoculation of HPV can occur. This reactivation of HPV is very closely associated in seropositive women with CD4 count and viral load (82). Thus, pap smear screening is probably important in this population even if they are currently HPV negative and celibate.
It has been proposed that HIV and HPV interact in two ways: the immunosuppression caused by HIV may result in worse HPV infections, and the two viruses themselves may interact. That immunosuppression is important is supported by the fact that women with CD4 cell counts of ≥500 are not at an increased risk of SILs, and those on immunosuppressive therapy for organ transplants without HIV infection are at an increased risk of SILs as well. Various mechanisms by which the two viruses actually interact have been proposed. It was noted in vitro that the tat-1 regulatory protein of HIV increases expression and reverses suppression of HPV-16’s regulatory gene (83). Cervical biopsies of HIV-positive women with SIL were compared to those of seronegative women who were matched for age, smoking status, and SIL grade for the mean count of Langerhans’, or antigen-presenting cells. Seropositive women had significantly lower numbers of Langerhans’ cells, and the number of cells was associated with CD4 cell count (84). A further analysis of cervical biopsy specimens revealed a decrease in macrophages among HIV-infected women (85), and others noted a unique CD8 lymphoid aggregate only in the biopsies of seropositive women with high grade SILs, suggesting impaired immunity at the level of the cervix (86).
A subject of debate in the past was how to best screen HIV-infected women for cervical dysplasia. Some authors have suggested that cytology is plagued with an increase in inadequate specimens from inflammation in this group (87), and studies on immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients show high false-negative rates with cytology as well (88,89). In one small study, cytology and colposcopy were performed on 32 seropositive women, demonstrating cervical SILs in 41%, with only 7.7% of them detected cytologically (90). This alarming result led the author to recommend baseline colposcopy with subsequent twice yearly cytology for all HIV-infected women, but a decreased sensitivity of this magnitude was never duplicated elsewhere. Further studies indicate that cytology is an adequate screening tool in this population (43,91,92,93). One study suggests that cytology and colposcopic impression correlate poorly with final histology, but that the correlation is equivalent in seropositive and seronegative women (94). A small Italian study suggests that cytology, with a sensitivity/specificity of 89.7% and 75.0% in seropositive women is a more accurate diagnostic tool than colposcopic impression, with a sensitivity/specificity of 79.3% and 75.0%, in this population (95). The United States Public Health Service recommends that HIV-positive women receive two cytologic studies in the first year of diagnosis, and, if normal, proceed with yearly cervical cytology (96). Various regimens for the detection of SILs have been analyzed in terms of the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) saved. The USPHS regimen results in an increase of 2.1 months life expectancy at $14,800/QALY, while semiannual cytology yields only 0.21 additional months of life expectancy at an additional cost of $12,800/QALY. An extreme regimen such as semiannual colposcopy would cost over $375,000/QALY with a minimal increase in life expectancy over the other regimens (97). A similar analysis of QALY subsequently demonstrated that if HPV testing were added to the initial cytologic screening with a modification of subsequent screens based on the results of the HPV assay, more cost effective strategies would ensue (98), as has been demonstrated in the past in the general population (99). Although some recommend routine anal cytology in HIV-infected women, this is not currently recommended (100,101,102). A study following HIV seropositive women who had normal pap smears and were HPV negative at baseline for 2 years demonstrated no high grade SILs at 2 years regardless of degree of immunosupression, and an incidence of low grade SILs similar to that of HIV seronegative women if the CD4 count was above 500/microL. Thus one may argue that in this group of immunocompetent women who are HPV negative screening may be performed as in the general population (103). Currently, however, such screening practices in women living with HIV have not been adequately tested.
The diagnosis of SILs in HIV-infected women involves colposcopic-directed biopsies. These women should have colposcopy even after a single cytologic specimen showing atypia or low grade lesions. Several studies suggest that colposcopy is less predictive in this group than in the general population. One analysis of women with high grade lesions on a cone biopsy specimen revealed that 47% of the seropositive women had only low grade lesions on colposcopic biopsy. This is in comparison with 9% of the seronegative control group (104). Thus it seems wise to biopsy abnormal findings liberally. Because of the higher prevalence of vulvar, vaginal, and anal intraepithelial neoplasias in HIV infected women (87,92,93), careful attention should be paid to these sites during the gynecologic exam, with colposcopy and/or biopsy of any abnormalities.
Because of the possible decreased sensitivity of colposcopy, treatment should probably be excisional instead of ablative in this population (105). Some authors have suggested an increase in complications of treatment, such as bleeding and infection (105), but there is not adequate data to support this in the literature. In one study no women who had a hysterectomy for carcinoma in situ of the cervix had complications (106). A study of cryotherapy for low grade cervical lesions demonstrated a 1% recurrence in seronegative women, and a 48% recurrence in HIV-seropositive women (107), and perhaps alternate forms of therapy should be chosen. Any management other than observation for a low grade lesion on the ectocervix is a subject of debate, and should probably be reserved for patients with severe immunocompromise if done at all. As previously mentioned, cytologic regression has been reported in a substantial portion of HIV infected women (65). In the Aids Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) 293, HIV-positive women with histologically proven low grade lesions were randomized to observation or isotretenoic acid by mouth, 0.5mg/kg/day for 6 months. Regression rates were high and progression rates were low in both groups, with similar findings in the two groups after 6 months, suggesting that observation alone is appropriate for most seropositive women with low grade lesions (108). In planning treatment, it is important to keep in mind the low rate of adherence with follow-up, reported as high as 35–63% in this population (106,109). Although recurrence rates are higher for seropositive women (107,110,111,112), treatment of high grade lesions is similar to that in the general population. A study of 45 HIV-positive women with cervical carcinoma in situ demonstrated a high rate of recurrence, 65% by cytology alone, after either cone biopsy or hysterectomy for treatment (106). One study following women after treatment for CIN demonstrated a treatment failure in 45%, with risks for failure being a CD4 count under 200 and being HPV positive after treatment. Recurrences were common in this study as well, although they were predominantly low grade (113). In ACTG 200 HIV-positive women were randomized after excisional treatment for high grade cervical lesions to observation or 5-FU cream applied vaginally. There were less high grade recurrences and a longer time until recurrence in the 5-FU group, although even in the treatment group the rate was high, 28% (114). This remains an alternative to repeat excisional therapy in the treatment of women with recurrent disease.
In the HIV-seropositive woman, contraception must play the dual role of birth control and prevention of transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. The clinician must carefully consider if a contraceptive option is effective, will prevent HIV transmission, will interact with other medications the patient is taking, or will affect the HIV infection itself. Although there is a high correlation between HIV-RNA levels in the blood and HIV in cervico-vaginal secretions, the infected woman must understand that 20–35% of women with undetectable virus in their blood are positive for HIV in their cervico-vaginal lavages, and that she is capable of transmitting the infection even with undetectable viral loads (115,116).
One longitudinal study of HIV-infected women and seronegative controls found that consistent use of barrier methods was only seen in about one third of women, use of a barrier with an additional form of contraception was rare, and condom use was not even associated with HIV serostatus (117). In contrast, a cross-sectional study of seropositive women demonstrated that two thirds had used condoms consistently in the previous one month (118). Both studies involved primarily African American women.
As in the general population, condoms alone do not provide excellent pregnancy prevention, with a first year failure rate of 12% and a perfect use failure rate of 3% (119). They function well at transmission prevention, however. In vitro, they prevent passage of the HIV-virus, and in a large metaanalysis, condoms use resulted in a 69% decrease in transmission (120). A study of HIV discordant heterosexual couples demonstrated, through analysis of vaginal sperm, sexually transmitted pregnancies, pregnancy, and DNA sequencing of new HIV infections, that there was significant underreporting of sex without condoms (121). The European study group, however, followed a cohort of 123 serodiscordant heterosexual couples, in which either the male or the female were infected, for 22 months. In couples reporting inconsistent condom use there were 4.8 seroconversions per 100 person years, while in those reporting consistent use there were no seroconversions (122). Male-to-female transmission generally occurs much more frequently, except in Africa and other developing nations, where transmission rates are nearly equivalent (123). With the great potential for condoms to prevent transmission, it is important to know which groups of women are at increased risk for poor condom use, and counsel them appropriately. A study of 2864 women “at risk” for HIV infection demonstrated as risk factors for poor use exchanging sex for money or drugs, binge drinking, having limited resources, and being dependent on one’s partner (124). A study of women who had a tubal ligation demonstrated an extremely poor rate of condom use in this population, with only one-fifth as many using condoms as demonstrated in unsterilized women (125).
Seroconcordant HIV-positive couples should be advised to use condoms as well, both for prevention of other sexually transmitted infections and to prevent reinoculation with the same, or superinfection with a different strain of HIV. A study of such couples, however, shows a marked decrease in condom use when both members are HIV-infected. There was no increase in progression to AIDS or decreased survival in such couples who denied any condom use in some studies (126,127), but more recent data suggests the opposite is true (128). Although condom use does not prevent genital HPV infection, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that their use may result in a decrease in condyloma or high grade cervical disease (129).
The female condom has been tested in vitro, and prevents HIV transmission in the laboratory (130). There are many errors in its use, however, with a 26% first year failure rate, usually due to ring slippage (131). The female condom protects more of the vaginal epithelium from exposure to semen, with a 3% probability of exposure as opposed to an 11% with the male condom (132).
In vitro, spermicides like nonoxynol-9 inactivate HIV within 60 seconds, but in vivo it does not appear to decrease the concentration of HIV in genital secretions. In a study of 6 rhesus monkeys, spermicides decreased seroconversion (133), but human studies are conflicting. A study of female sex workers in Kenya demonstrated an increased HIV acquisition with spermicide and sponge use together, probably secondary to inflammation and ulcers caused by such frequent use of spermicides in this population (134), making the CDC hesitant to recommend spermicide use for HIV prevention. One reanalysis of an observational study suggests that spermicides indeed prevent transmission (135), but a metanalysis of multiple trials yields conflicting results, with a protective effect in one observational study and a nonsignificantly increased risk in one clinical trial (136). Seroinfected women with discordant partners should not use spermicides because of the potential for increased transmission to their partners (132). Newer spermicides which cause less inflammation are being tested to potentially decrease the risk of HIV transmission. Phase 1 and 2 studies of a substance with in vitro prevention of HIV transmission called PC 213, with iota-carrageenan, show little colposcopic evidence of inflammation or ulcers with its use (137), making it potentially promising.
Primate studies demonstrate that HIV-transmission can occur transvaginally without a cervix after hysterectomy, and a case was reported of a woman with cervical agenesis who acquired HIV sexually through a neovagina (138), demonstrating that coverage of the cervix alone would not be adequate to prevent transmission. Women using the diaphragm, sponge, or cervical cap need to know that these forms of contraception do not prevent transmission or acquisition.
Permanent sterilization is the chosen contraceptive method for many HIV-serodiscordant or concordant couples. Tubal ligation is clearly associated with a decrease in condom use, with one study demonstrating that over half of women who are sterilized have no plan to continue condom use (139), and this has been demonstrated in women living with HIV as well (140). Among seropositive men who went for vasectomy, a small subset had a resultant decrease in seropositive semen after the procedure, although this does not reliably occur (141). The use of sterilization among post partum women living with HIV has significantly decreased since the advent of the PACTG-076 trial (142).
Theoretically, the increase in duration and flow of menses associated with a copper containing intrauterine device (IUD) use could lead to an increase in transmission to partners. In the European study group, however, there were no female-to-male transmissions in IUD users (143), and in a study of 98 seropositive IUD users, there was no difference in prevalence of cervical shedding of HIV before and 4 months after IUD placement (144). Similarly, the IUD theoretically could have a decreased efficacy in women with impaired immune systems, and is associated with anemia and an increase in pelvic infections. For these reasons, a World Health Organization expert group had decided in 2000 that IUDs were not appropriate for HIV-infected women (145). There is now an abundance of data suggesting the safety of IUDs in this population. An initial study was done in Kenya of over 600 women without active pelvic infections and not at high risk of such infections who were given IUDs and followed for 4 months. At all CD4 counts, the HIV seropositive women had no increase in overall complications (7.6% in seropositive, 7.9% in seronegative women), nor an increase in infectious complications (1.4% in seropositive, 0.2% in seronegative women,), suggesting that IUD use is safe in carefully selected populations of HIV-positive women (146). A subsequent study of 12 seropositive women given the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system demonstrated the following with its use: a decrease in menstrual bleeding, no ovulations, an increase in serum hemoglobin and ferritin, no change in CD4 or HIV-RNA levels, and no change in cervical shedding of the virus (147). The decrease in menstrual flow and lack of an effect on cervical shedding make the levonorgestrel intrauterine system especially attractive for women with seronegative partners. A recent trial in which 599 postpartum women were randomized to either a copper-containing IUD or hormonal contraception demonstrated decreased pregnancy rates and a decrease in disease progression with the IUD. There was one case of pelvic inflammatory disease in the IUD-using group (148). The World Health Organization changed their position in 2004, stating that the IUD may be initiated in HIV infected women without AIDS and in those with AIDS who are well on therapy, and that it may be continued, but not initiated in women with AIDS who are not on therapy (149). Women should be at low risk for and screened for sexually transmitted infections prior to IUD insertion, and the levonorgestrel-releasing system is an excellent choice of IUD in this population when available.
There is concern that oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) may be associated with an increase in HIV transmission. In theory, OCPs are associated with cervical ectopy, and ectopy may be associated with an increase in viral shedding and transmission. There are competing factors that may decrease transmission, however, such as the decreased bleeding and the increased cervical mucous viscosity associated with OCPs. The resultant decrease in vaginal pH seen in OCP users may, on the contrary, increase HIV transmission. A meta-analysis of the data suggests that no inferences can be made on an association between OCP use and HIV transmission (150), except, of course, through the well-known reciprocal association between OCPs and condom use. This association holds true among HIV-infected women as well, with less than half of infected women who are on OCPs reporting concurrent use of condoms (140).
Because of the plethora of effects that female hormones have on the immune system (151), there has always been concern that OCPs may affect HIV-infection. OCPs affect not only cell-mediated immunity, but natural killer cell, IgG, and IgM activity as well (151). Conflicting data about an effect of female hormones on HIV infection exist. Some animal models demonstrate hormonal regulation of retroviruses at the level of gene transcription (152). A primate study demonstrated an increase in HIV transmission and rapid progression in ovariectomized monkeys that had subcutaneous progesterone implants when compared to those with placebo implants (153), suggesting a harmful effect of progesterone. Data collected over the menstrual cycle, however, reveal a decreased viral load in women during the luteal phase of their cycle when progesterone levels are high (154). Similar concerns exist about other forms of hormonal contraception, with the added concern regarding transmission in depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate users because of an increase in vaginal bleeding. A longitudinal study of seropositive women found no change in viral load and a statistically significant but clinically unimportant increase in CD4 count with hormonal contraception use (155). These women were using either contraceptive pills or progestin-only forms such as the depo-provera injection of subcutaneous levonorgestrel implants. Certainly there is abundant data on pregnancy in HIV-positive women to suggest that hormone use will not affect disease progression (156,157,158,159). Similarly, a recent study of over 300 women on combined oral contraceptive pills or depo-provera injections demonstrated no change in CD4 or HIV-RNA over the subsequent 24 months (160).
Hormonal contraceptive users must be aware of the possible interaction between hormones and many of the drugs used by HIV-positive women by way of the cytochrome p450 CYP 3A4 system (161). Various antiretroviral medications may act as cytochrome p450 substrates, activators, inhibitors, or, as ritonavir, nelfinavir, and efavirenz do, act as a combination of all three (162). The activation of this enzymatic system by the drug may decrease the concentration of steroid hormones, resulting in a decrease in contraceptive efficacy. This association has long been known for the antituberculosis drug Rifampin (163), but has now been demonstrated for several antiretroviral therapies as well, both non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. These studies are usually pharmacokinetic studies of healthy patients getting short term treatment with a single antiretroviral medication, and how applicable they are to long term use of multiple medications in a chronically infected woman is questionable (164). Data on 33 healthy female volunteers who were given Ritonavir demonstrates a subsequent decrease in the concentration of ethinyl estradiol (165). A pharmacokinetic study of 10 women on OCPs in which ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone levels were measured before and 30 days after Nevirapine use demonstrated a significant decrease in the concentration of both hormones after Nevirapine (166). A retrospective review of a database of 2053 women demonstrated OCP failure significantly more often in women with concomitant use of nelfinavir (167). Current recommendations for women using hormonal contraception concurrently with efavirenz or nevirapine are to use additional or alternative contraception (168). Certainly women on these antiretrovirals desiring oral contraceptives should be on a pill with at least 30 micrograms of estrogen and be counseled not to miss any pills.
A study looking at changes in depo-provera with use of nelfinavir, nevirapine, or efavirenz demonstrated no effect of these antiretrovirals on the concentration of the hormone (169). The same is probably true for levonorgestrel subcutaneous implants. Women on antiretrovirals using depo-provera, however, should be cautioned against getting subsequent doses beyond the recommended twelve weeks. After initiation of HAART, women using hormonal contraception responded similarly to non-users of hormones in terms of CD4 cell count and HIV RNA. These hormones, therefore, are probably not significantly decreasing the concentration of antiretrovirals in any clinically significant way (170). Deciding on a contraceptive method is difficult due to the many factors that need to be taken into consideration in the HIV-infected woman.
Women with HIV may be at risk for an increase in gynecologic surgery for a number of reasons. One longitudinal cohort study reported that women living with HIV are more likely than seronegative controls to have a hysterectomy, and that this was most often done for cervical neoplasia (171). Other studies demonstrated a trend toward more tuboovarian abscesses, which often require surgical intervention, among women with pelvic inflammatory disease who were HIV infected (172,173). There is a paucity of literature about the rate of complications after gynecologic surgery in HIV infected women, but this can be extrapolated from the obstetrical cesarean section and other surgical data. The European HIV in Obstetrics group reported a post-cesarean section (elective and non-elective) complication rate of 42.7%, mostly from febrile morbidity and anemia requiring transfusion (174). Seropositive and age, gender, and surgery matched negative controls were compared in a study of postoperative complications. The surgeries included gynecologic as well as other types of non-obstetrical surgery. The postoperative complication rate was similar in the two groups except for an increase in pneumonia and mortality at one year in the seropositive group. Complication rate increased as HIV-RNA went above 30,000 copies/ml, but CD4 count did not affect it. The group was quite healthy and the majority were on antiretroviral therapy, and febrile morbidity and the need for transfusion were not examined (175). Overall, in the seropositive patient having surgery one can expect a small increase in usually minor complications. This rate may be further increased in patients with a high viral load.
Because of the improved prognosis, and because 10–5% of new HIV infections in the U.S. are currently in people over 50 years of age, the population of seropositive people is aging. Disorders of bone mineral density appear to be more frequently seen in people living with HIV, and so the clinician caring for seropositive women needs to pay special attention to assessing and modifying their patients’ risk factors for osteoporosis as well as screening for and treating it.
Initially the decrease in bone density was felt to be solely secondary to HAART, especially the protease inhibitors (176). In vitro studies have, in fact, demonstrated an increase in osteoclastic action with zidovudine (177) as well as impaired bone mineralization with the addition of tenofovir (178). More recent reports, however, have demonstrated an increase in osteoporosis and osteopenia in people who are infected but antiretroviral naïve (179, 180,181), although in increase risk of fracture has never been demonstrated (182). A recent case report of a 6 year old antiretroviral-naïve HIV positive child with severe osteoporosis and multiple fractures supports a direct effect of the HIV virus on bone metabolism (183). Possible mechanisms of action include a direct effect of the virus on osteoclasts, chronic inflammation causing cytokine activation and an increase in bone absorption, or an alteration in the metabolism of vitamin D (183,184). Certainly comorbid conditions such as smoking, wasting or being bedridden may contribute to decreases in bone mineral density.
In an attempt to quantify the risk of osteoporosis attributable to HIV infection, Brown et al performed a meta-analysis and concluded that people who are HIV infected have a threefold increase of osteoporosis compared to seronegative controls (185). Those on antiretroviral therapy have a 2.4 fold increase compared to antiretroviral-naïve controls, and those specifically on protease inhibitors (PIs) have a 1.6 fold increase compared to non-PI treated controls. It is unclear, however, whether those on antiretrovirals are just a group who has been infected for longer, are older, and have more severe disease. Risk factors for low bone mineral density among seropositive individuals include low BMI, advanced age, female gender, high viral load, advanced stage of disease (186), low muscle mass, low testosterone level (187), and duration of illness (188).
Several studies have demonstrated that the bisphosphonate alendronate along with calcium and vitamin D is effective as well as safe for increasing bone mineral density in seropositive men and, although fractures were not significantly decreased, women (189,190,191,192). Treatment is usually taken once weekly
Screening guidelines for disorders of bone mineral density in HIV infected women have not been established. Since ACOG advises the screening of women with other risk factors at menopause (193), it makes sense to screen all seropositive women at menopause. Women with other risk factors or a long history of HIV infection may benefit from screening in the perimenopausal period or earlier.
As the population of HIV infected individuals in this country has shifted from primarily gay and bisexual men to heterosexuals of childbearing age, the number of seropositive women contemplating pregnancy has drastically increased. Referrals to gynecologists caring for HIV infected women are sometimes made by infectious disease specialists caring for men who, with their partners, plan to start a family. In a survey of 2864 HIV seropositive adults, almost one third expressed a desire to have children in the future (194), and this number is consistent with that found in a study of 118 seropositive women. In this latter study, the desire for children was associated with young age, high CD4 counts, a newer relationship, and not being on antiretroviral therapy (195). Among women who had been sterilized, 12% expressed tubal regret.
Whether or not infertility rates are higher among HIV seropositive couples is a matter of some dispute. Infected women who have advanced disease (21) or are wasted (15) have an increase in anovulatory cycles. One small study demonstrated a 27.8% incidence of tubal occlusion on hysterosalpingogram among seropositive women (196), but this is not supported elsewhere in the literature. One would expect an increase in tubal factor infertility with HIV infection similar to what has been seen in other groups of women with sexually transmitted infections. Among seropositive males, increases in abnormal semen, including decreases in sperm counts, as well as normal sperm morphology and motility have been demonstrated (197,198). Thus, one can expect significant numbers of HIV-infected couples to seek assistance with reproduction because of infertility. It is the responsibility of the clinician caring for a seropositive woman contemplating pregnancy to discuss all of the following points: the risk of vertical transmission, the need to be on HAART during the pregnancy, the avoidance of drugs such as efavirenz during organogenesis, the role of cesarean section to decrease vertical transmission, and the importance of neonatal zidovudine.
Another reason such couples may pursue assisted reproduction is to decrease the risk of horizontal HIV transmission. In the serodiscordant couple with an HIV infected woman, this is easily affected through insemination with the partner’s semen. Couples with limited resources may even elect to place semen in the vagina on their own.
The serodiscordant couple with an HIV positive male hoping to limit horizontal transmission is more challenging, and they will frequently present to the gynecologist for advice. Clearly adoption and insemination with donor sperm are the only options with no risk of transmission. A small study of 50 such couples seeking assisted reproductive techniques demonstrates that these options are not acceptable for many. If given no other options, 12% stated that they would resort to timed intercourse to conceive, and over half would not consider the use of donor sperm (199).
The serodiscordant couple contemplating timed intercourse should be counseled against this, as transmission occurs in 1 of 500 to 1 of 1000 instances of unsafe sex, with a 4.3% horizontal transmission rate reported in couples using timed intercourse to conceive (200). If they do proceed with timed intercourse, they should be counseled not to start until the male’s viral load is undetectable, to avoid sexual contact if either partner has any other untreated sexual infections, ulcers, or bleeding, and to use ovulation predictors to accurately time their sexual contacts. They should confirm pregnancy before having unsafe sex in the next cycle so that they do not become infected during pregnancy. They should be aware that an undetectable viral load in plasma does not mean that there is no virus in the semen (201). One small Swiss study of 21 serodiscordant male positive couples demonstrated pregnancy rates of more than 70% with timed intercourse. In this study all males had undetectable viral loads in their plasma and semen. The women were given pre-exposure prophylaxis with tenofovir 12 and 36 hours before intercourse. There were no HIV seroconversions at 3 months (202). Because of its rapid uptake, one tablet two hours before intercourse has also been recommended (203). Other investigators have proposed using vaginal estriol gel on days 1–5 to thicken the epithelium and potentially decrease horizontal transmission, although this has only been demonstrated in simian models (204).
Although there is a paucity of centers in the United States offering HIV infected males sperm washing for intrauterine insemination of HIV negative women, this has been done for 15 years in Europe (205). After case reports of unscreened donor intrauterine insemination (206) and insemination from washed sperm of an HIV infected husband (207) in the literature, the Centers for Disease Control in 1990 recommended against the insemination of semen from HIV-infected men. Nevertheless, over 4500 inseminations have been performed worldwide with no horizontal transmissions reported (203). Although it is well documented that the HIV virus is present in semen even in men with undetectable plasma viral loads (208,209), there is no evidence that it can be carried by sperm (210). Typically for these procedures semen is processed through gradient centrifugation followed by a swim-up procedure (205). Because HIV may be attached to sperm, and because HIV-associated proviral DNA may be present in seminal cells of men with undetectable viral loads (211), some researchers advocate testing the washed sperm for HIV-RNA (212) and even for proviral DNA (213) prior to its use. Kato recently published a technique he used for washing 73 semen samples with no proviral DNA or HIV-RNA detected using PCR with a detection limit of one copy (213).
Some researchers feel that the risk of exposure to millions of sperm as well as to other cellular debris associated with IUI is unwarranted in the face of in vitro fertilization- intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI), which limits exposure to less than 20 sperm. Over 200 cycles of ICSI have been performed to date with no seroconversions (210), and a recent study comparing ICSI in 30 serodiscordant male positive couples and 79 HIV negative controls with tubal factor infertility demonstrated equal success rates regardless of serostatus (212). Others, however, believe that in light of the IUI safety record reported in the literature, the extra risk of ovarian hyperstimulation and multiple gestation seen with ICSI is not justified without male factor infertility as an additional indication for its use (215). There are very few centers that provide either service to HIV infected couples in the United States (210).
There is very little data on which to base recommendations to the HIV positive seroconcordant couple. Seroconcordant positive couples are typically counseled to practice safe sex, and superinfection with a different HIV strain has been demonstrated as a result of unsafe practices, with a subsequent worsening in the severity of infection (128). Such couples typically become pregnant without the aid of assisted reproductive technology, but it should be offered in order to possibly decrease the risk of superinfection (216).
Access to assisted reproductive technology, either for infertility or to limit horizontal transmission, remains limited in the United States. The Center for Disease Control’s 1990 recommendation against artificial insemination as well as the American Society for Reproductive Medicine’s 1994 guidelines expressing concern about horizontal and vertical transmission as well as the birth of a child to parents with a limited life span led practitioners away from helping infected couples become pregnant. The fact that inseminating a woman with HIV-infected semen constitutes a criminal offense in some states (216) has furthered such sentiments. The fear of nosocomial transmission of HIV to stored embryos and the need and cost for separate storage containers for seropositive gametes has also deterred infertility practices from including seropositive couples. Such cross-contamination in storage tanks with viruses has been demonstrated (217). A survey of assisted reproduction clinic managers reveals that only 6.5% of them feel that their services should be offered to seropositive women (218).
With the prolonged life span and low risk of vertical transmission that have gone hand in hand with the use of HAART, coupled with the frequent decision of seropositive couples to conceive, it has become incumbent upon the practitioner to counsel and assist such couples on the safest ways to proceed. The Ethics Committee of the ASRM published new guidelines in 2004 for the treatment of HIV infected individuals/couples concluding that HIV infection is considered a disability protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and that denying medical services because of HIV infection may be a violation of law (219).
The treatment of most sexually transmitted infections is similar in HIV-infected and non-infected women (220). Only differences in treatment will be discussed here.
Herpes simplex virus-2 infections affect 50–90% of HIV infected individuals worldwide (221). The Centers for Disease Control in 1993 added a herpetic lesion present for at least one month’s duration to the list of AIDS-defining illnesses (17). HIV-infected women tend to have more herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections of increased severity, with an increased healing time, and often an atypical presentation. They also have more frequent episodes of shedding of HSV-2 (222). HSV infections are more likely to be acyclovir-resistant in HIV-infected individuals, with a resistance rate of 5% (223) as opposed to 1% in the general population (224). The treatment of HSV infections in HIV-infected patients is the same as in non-infected patients for episodic infections, and is only slightly modified to include higher doses for recurrent or suppressive therapy. Long term use of acyclovir as suppressive therapy for up to 10 years in HIV-infected individuals is both effective and safe (223), and demonstrates no significant interactions with antiretrovirals (225). If a herpetic lesion persists in an HIV-infected patient on antiviral therapy, HSV resistance should be suspected and appropriate testing should be performed. Since acyclovir-resistant strains are usually not susceptible to valacyclovir or famciclovir, intravenous foscarnet should be used for treatment (221). HAART has been shown to reduce the incidence of herpetic ulcers, but it may not affect asymptomatic viral shedding (225). Because HSV-2 coinfection increases the chance of HIV transmission to seronegative partners, and because HSV-2 reactivation causes an elevation in HIV-RNA, there is some data to support serologic testing for HSV-2 in asymptomatic HIV-infected women, with chronic suppressive therapy in those demonstrating HSV-2 antibodies (225).
The prevalence of syphilis is increased among HIV-infected women, and neurosyphilis is more common in this population. Moreover, as an ulcerative disease, it facilitates HIV transmission to uninfected individuals. A mathematical model of HIV transmission was used to conclude that in the United States in the year 2000, approximately 545 new cases of HIV infection in African Americans were attributable to syphilis (226). Two studies examined the risk of treatment failure in seropositive individuals with syphilis. A British study reported equal failure rates in seropositive and negative patients (226), but a U.S. study reported significantly more failures among seropositive individuals (17% vs 5%) (228). In both studies a variety of treatments were used. One study of seropositive patients with syphilis who had a lumbar puncture done demonstrated an increase in neurosyphilis in women, in those with neurologic manifestations, and in those with a titer of greater than or equal to 1/32, suggesting that lumbar puncture need not be done in the absence of symptoms and with a lower titer (229). Treatment of syphilis in HIV-infected individuals is similar to that in the general population with the following exceptions: individuals should have an examination of their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) performed prior to therapy if they have late latent syphilis or syphilis of unknown duration, or after therapy if there is a four-fold rise in non-treponemal titers during treatment or there is not a four-fold decrease by 12–24 months after treatment. Ceftriaxone and azithromyin should not be used for treatment in patients with HIV infection (230). Penicillin-allergic individuals should be desensitized and treated with penicillin. In addition, some, but not most, experts recommend treating primary and secondary syphilis with the 3 weekly injections of penicillin usually reserved for latent syphilis, and some recommend an examination of the CSF even in early syphilis (220). Dual-infected individuals should have RPR titers followed for 24 months with late and 12 months with early disease as they can take longer to fall (230)
HIV-infected patients who have chancroid are more likely to have treatment failure and to require longer courses of therapy. Some specialists recommend not using the single-dose options for treating these patients, especially if follow-up cannot be ensured (220).
Early reports of pelvic inflammatory disease in HIV-infected women suggest that presentation may be atypical in this population, with an increased need for surgical interventions and an increase mortality rate (231,232,233,234). In 1993, pelvic inflammatory disease, “especially with a tuboovarian abscess” was even included in the list of Category B symptoms (17). More recent data suggest fewer differences in pelvic inflammatory disease between seropositive women and the general population, with HIV-positive women more likely to have tuboovarian abscesses, but responding well to outpatient treatment (235,236,237). Studies have demonstrated more prolonged hospitalization among seropositive women with acute salpingitis (238). Current recommendations for the treatment of upper genital tract infections are the same as in the general population (220).
Conclusion
We have made great strides in understanding the management of the many gynecologic conditions that affect HIV-positive women with an increased frequency. As the HIV-infected woman’s life expectancy continues to lengthen, we will need new treatments for recurring conditions such as lower genital tract neoplasias. We have much to learn about the interaction between sex steroids, HIV-infection, and the immune system. As our knowledge grows, we will be better equipped to counsel women about contraceptive issues, the menopause and related issues, and pregnancy and infertility.
Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1. HIV-positive women report hormone problem. WORLD Newsletter. 1994 May;:34.
2. Warne PA, Ehrhardt A, Schechter D, Williams J, Gorman J. Menstrual abnormalities in HIV+ and HIV− women with a history of intravenous drug use (abstract M. C. 311). VII International Conference on AIDS; Florence, Italy. 1991.
3. Muggiasca ML, Agarossi A, Ghetti E, Ravasi L, Federici D, Conti M. Gyneacological problems in HIV-positive women (abstract PO-B23-1941). IX International Conference on AIDS; Berlin, Germany. 1993.
4. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS surveillance report. 1995. pp. 1–34.
5. Munster K, Helm P, Schmidt L. Secondary amenorrhea: Prevalence and medical contract—A cross-sectional study from a Danish county. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;99:430–433. [PubMed]
6. Semple SJ, Patterson TL, Temoshok LR, McCutchan JA, Straits-Troster KA, et al. Identification of psychobiological stressors among HIV-positive women. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center (HNRC) Group. Women Health. 1993;20(4):15–36. [PubMed]
7. Ball SC. Amenorrhea in an HIV-infected woman. The AIDS Reader. 1998;8(3):92–94.
8. Stricker RB. Hemostatic abnormalities in HIV diseases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1991;5:249–265. [PubMed]
9. Scadden DT, Zon LI, Groopman JE. Pathophysiology and management of HIV-associated hematologic disorders. Blood. 1989;74(5):1455–1463. [PubMed]
10. DHHS Panel on Clinical Practices for the Treatment of HIV Infection. 2001 February;:48.
11. Bierman M, Nolah GH. Menstrual function and renal transplantation. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;4(2):186–189. 9. [PubMed]
12. Valimaki M, Pelkonene R, Salaspuro M, Harkonen M, Hirvonen E, Ylikahri R. Sex hormones in amenorrheic women with alcoholic liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;59(1):133–138. [PubMed]
13. Vigano A, Manzoni P, Riva S, et al. Hyperinsulinemia induced by highly active antiretroviral therapy in an adolescent with polycystic ovary syndrome who was infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(2):422–423. [PubMed]
14. Wanke CA, Silva M, Know TZ, Forrester J, Speigelman D, Gorbach SL. Weight loss and wasting remain common complications in individuals infected with HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2000;31(3):803–805. [PubMed]
15. Grinspoon S, Corcoran C, Miller K, Biller B, Askari H, Wang E, et al. Body composition and endocrine function in women with AIDS wasting. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(5):1332–1337. [PubMed]
16. Chirgwin KD, Feldman J, Muneyyirci-Delale O, Landesman S, Minkoff H. Menstrual function in HIV-infected women without AIDS. JAIDS. 1996;12(5):489–494. [PubMed]
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 1993 Revised classification for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR. 1992 Dec 18;41(RR17):1–19. [PubMed]
18. Ellerbrock TV, Wright TC, Bush TJ, Dole P, Brudney K, Chiasson M. Characteristics of menstruation in women infected with HIV. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(6):1030–1034. [PubMed]
19. Shah PN, Smith JR, Wells C, Barton SE, Kitchen VS, Steer PJ. Menstrual symptoms in women infected by the HIV. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(3):397–400. [PubMed]
20. Harlow SC, Schuman P, Cohen M, Ohmit SE, Cu-Uvin S, Lin X, et al. Effect of HIV infection on menstrual cycle length. JAIDS. 2000;24(1):68–75. [PubMed]
21. Watts DH, Spino C, Zaborski L, Katzenstein D, Hammer S, Benson C. Comparison of gynecologic history and laboratory results in HIV-positive women with CD4+ lymphocyte counts between 200 and 500 cells/µl and below 100 cells/µl. JAIDS. 1999;20(5):455–462. [PubMed]
22. Raffi F, Brisseau J-M, Planchon B, Remi JP, Barrier JH, Grolleau J-Y. Endocrine function in 98 HIV-infected patients: a prospective study. J AIDS. 1991;5:729–733. [PubMed]
23. Dobs AS, Few WL, Blackman MR, Harman SM, Hoover DR, Graham NMH. Serum hormones in men with HIV-associated wasting. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(11):4108–4112. [PubMed]
24. Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. Metabolic disturbances and wasting in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(5):329–337. [PubMed]
25. Sinha-Hikim I, Arver S, Beall G, Shen R, Guerrero M, Sattler F, et al. The use of a sensitive equilibrium dialysis method for the measurement of free testosterone levels in healthy, cycling women and in HIV-infected women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(4):1312–1318. [PubMed]
26. Mazer NA. Testosterone deficiency in women: etiologies, diagnosis, and emerging treatments. Int J Fertil. 2002;47(2):77–86. [PubMed]
27. Bakos O, Lundkvist O, Wide L, Berhg T. Ultrasonographical and hormonal description of the normal ovulatory menstrual cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73(10):790–796. [PubMed]
28. Waller K, Swan S, Windham G, Fenster L, Elkin E, Lasley B. Use of urine biomarkers to evaluate menstrual function in healthy premenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(11):1071–1080. [PubMed]
29. Clark RA, Mulligan K, Stamenovic E, Chang B, Watts H, Andersen J, et al. Frequency of anovulation and early menopause among women enrolled in selected adult AIDS clinical trials group studies. J Infect Dis. 2001;184(10):1325–1327. [PubMed]
30. Greenblatt RM, Ameli N, Grant RM, Bacchetti P, Taylor RN. Impact of the ovulatory cycle on virologic and immunologic markers in HIV-infected women. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(1):375–376. [PubMed]
31. Cu-Uvin S, Wright DJ, Anderson D, Kovacs A, Watts DH, Cohn J, et al. Hormonal levels among HIV-1-seropositive women compared with high-risk HIV-seronegative women during the menstrual cycle. Women’s Health Study (WHS) 001 and WHS 001a Study Team. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9(8):857–863. [PubMed]
32. Cejtin HE, Kalinowski A, Bacchetti P, et al. Effects of human immunodeficiency virus on protracted amenorrhea and ovarian dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1423–1431. [PubMed]
33. Cejtin HE, Kalinowski A, Bacchetti P, et al. Assessment of menopause in HIV-positive women (Abstract No. 15653). 15th International AIDS Conference; Thailand. 2004.
34. Schoenbaum EE, Hartel D, Lo Y, et al. HIV infection, drug use, and onset of natural menopause. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(10):1517–1524. [PubMed]
35. Seifer DB, Golub ET, Lambert-Messerlian G, Springer G, Holman S, Moxley M, Cejtin HE, et al. Biologic markers of ovarian reserve and reproductive aging: application in a cohort study of HIV infection in women. Fertil Steril. 2007 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. van Benthem BH, Vernazza P, Coutinho RA, et al. Impace of pregnancy and menopause on CD4 cell counts. JAIDS. 2005;38 Suppl 1:S22. [PubMed]
37. Clark RA, Cohn SE, Jarek C, Craven KS, Lyons C, Jacobson M, et al. Perimenopausal symptomatology among HIV-infected women at least 40 years of age. JAIDS. 2000;23(1):99–100. [PubMed]
38. Ferreira CE, Pinto-Neto AM, Conde DM, Costa-Paiva L, Morais SS, Magalhaes J. Menopause symptoms in women infected with HIV: prevalence and associated factors. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007;23(4):198–205. [PubMed]
39. Vermund ST, Kelly KF, Klein RS, et al. High risk of HPV infection and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions among women with symptomatic HIV infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(2):392–400. [PubMed]
40. Marte C, Kelly P, Cohen M, Fruchter RG, Sedlis A, Gallo L, et al. Papanicolaou smear abnormalities in ambulatory care sites for women infected with HIV. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(4):1232–1237. [PubMed]
41. Conti M, Agarossi A, Parazzini F, Muggiasca ML, Boschini A, Negri E, et al. HPV, HIV infection, and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in former intravenous drug abusers. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;49(3):344–348. [PubMed]
42. Wright TC, Koulos J, Schnoll F, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in women infected with HIV. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;44:191–194. [PubMed]
43. Wright T, Ellerbrock T, Chaisson MA, Van Devanter N, Xiao-Wei S. New York Cervical Disease Study. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in women with HIV: prevalence, risk factors and validity of Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(4):591–597. [PubMed]
44. ter Meulen J, Eberhardt HC, Luande J, Mgaya HN, Chang-Claude J, Mtiro H, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, HIV infections and cervical cancer in Tanzania, East Africa. Int J Cancer. 1992;51(4):515–521. [PubMed]
45. Bouwes Bavinck JN, Berkhout RJ. HPV infections and immunosuppression. Clin Dermatol. 1997;15:427–437. [PubMed]
46. McGregor JM, Proby CM, Leigh IM. Virus infection and cancer risk in transplant recipients. Trends Microbiol. 1997;4:2–3. [PubMed]
47. Petry KU, Scheffel D, Bode U, et al. Cellular immunodeficiency enhances the progression of human papillomavirus-associated cervical lesions. Int J Cancer. 1994;57(6):836–840. [PubMed]
48. Sun X, Ellerbrock TV, Lungu O, Chiasson MA, Bush TJ, Wright TC. Human papillomavirus infection in HIV-seropositive women. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(5 Pt 1):680–686. [PubMed]
49. Kreiss JK, Kiviat NB, Plummer FA, Roberts PL, Waiyaki P, Ngugi E, et al. HIV, HPV, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in Nairobi prostitues. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19(1):54–59. [PubMed]
50. Massad LS, Riester KA, Anastos KM, Fruchter RG, Palefsky JM, Burk RD, et al. Prevalence and predictors of squamous cell abnormalities in Papanicolaou smears from women infected with HIV-1. JAIDS. 1999;21(1):33–41. [PubMed]
51. Minkoff H, Feldman J, Burk R, Matityahu D, Clake L. The prevalence and incidence of gynecologic disease among HIV infected and uninfected women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(4):824–836. [PubMed]
52. Williams AB, Darragh TM, Vranizan K, Ochia C, Moss AR, Palefsky JM. Anal and cervical human papillomavirus infection and risk of anal and cervical epithelial abnormalities in HIV-infected women. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(2):205–211. [PubMed]
53. Johnstone FD, McGoogan E, Smart GE, Brettle RP, Prescott RJ. A population-based, controlled study of the relation between HIV infection and cervical neoplasias. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;101:986–991. [PubMed]
54. Mandelblatt JS, Kanetsky P, Eggert L, Gold K. Is HIV infection a cofactor for cervical squamous cell neoplasias? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevent. 1999;8:97–106. [PubMed]
55. Duerr A, Kieke B, Warren D, Shah K, Robert B, Peipert J, et al. Human papillomavirus-associated cervical cytology abnormalities among women with or at risk of infection with HIV. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(4):584–590. [PubMed]
56. Brogly SB, Watts DH, Ylitalo N, France EL, Seage GR, 3rd, Oleske J, Eagle M, Van Dyke R. Reproductive health of adolescent girls perinatally infected with HIV. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(6):1047–1052. [PubMed]
57. French AL, Kirstein LM, Massad LS, et al. Association of vitamin A deficiency with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(4):1084–1089. [PubMed]
58. Helm CW, Lorenz DJ, Meyer NJ, Rising WR, Wulff JL. Retinoids for preventing the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;17(4) CD003296. [PubMed]
59. Maiman M, Fruchter RG, Guy L, Cuthill S, Levine Pq, Serur E. HIV infection and invasive cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 1993;71(2):402–406. [PubMed]
60. Schafer A, Friedmann W, Mielke M, Schwartlander B, Koch MA MA. The increased frequency of cervical dysplasia-neoplasia in women infected with the HIV is related to the degree of immunosuppression. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(2):593–599. [PubMed]
61. Maiman M, Fruchter RG, Sedlis A, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and accuracy of cytologic screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in women with the HIV. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;68(3):233–239. [PubMed]
62. Six C, Heard I, Bergeron C, et al. Comparative prevalence, incidence and short-term prognosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions amongst HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. AIDS. 1998;1(9):1047–1056. 2. [PubMed]
63. Watts DH, Spino C, Zaborski L, Katzenstein D, Hammer S, Benson C. Comparison of gynecologic history and laboratory results in HIV-positive women with CD4+ lymphocyte counts between 200 and 500 cells/µl and below 100 cells/µl. JAIDS. 1999;20(5):455–462. [PubMed]
64. Ellerbrock TV, Chiasson MA, Bush TJ, Sun XW, Sawo D, Brudney K, Wright TC., Jr Incidence of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-infected women. JAMA. 2000;282(8):1031–1037. [PubMed]
65. Massad LS, Ahdieh L, Benning L, Minkogg H, Greenblatt RM, Watts H, et al. Evolution of cervical abnormalities among women with HIV-1: Evidence from surveillance cytology in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study. JAIDS. 2001;27(5):432–442. [PubMed]
66. Harris TG, Burk RD, Xue X, Anastos K, Minkoff H, Massad LS, Young MA, Levine AM, Gange SJ, Watts DH, Palefsky JM, Strickler HD. Association of cutaneous anergy with human papillomavirus and cervical neoplasia in HIV-seropositive and seronegative women. AIDS. 2007;21(14):1933–1941. [PubMed]
67. Massad LS, Evans CT, Minkoff H, Watts DH, Strickler HD, Darragh T, Levine A, Anastos K, Moxley M, Passaro DJ. Natural history of grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with human immunodeficiency virus. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(5 Pt 1):1077–1085. [PubMed]
68. Jones JL, Dworkin MS, Ward JW, Jaffe HW. Effect of antiretroviral therapy on recent trends in selected cancers among HIV-infected persons. JAIDS. 1999;21:S11–S17. [PubMed]
69. Centro Operative AIDS. Aggiornamento dei casi di AIDS notificati in Italia al 30 giugno 1999. Notiziario dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanita. 2000;13:7.
70. Conti S, Masocco M, Pezzotti P, et al. Differential impact of combined antiretroviral therapy on the survival of Italian patiens with specific AIDS-defining illness. JAIDS. 2000;25(5):451–458. [PubMed]
71. Jacobsen LP. Impact of potent antiretroviral therapy on the incidence of Kaposi’s sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among HIV-infected individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;21:S31–S34. [PubMed]
72. Delmas MC, Larsen C, van Benthem B, et al. Cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV infected women: prevalence, incidence and regression. AIDS. 2000;14(12):1775–1784. [PubMed]
73. Heard I, Costagliola D, Orth G, Kazachkine D. Early regression of cervical lesions in HIV-seropositive women receiving HAART. AIDS. 1998;12(12):1459–1464. [PubMed]
74. Orlando G, Fasolo MM, Schiavini M, Signori R, Cargnei A. Role of HAART in human papilloma virus-induced genital dysplasia in HIV-1 infected patients. AIDS. 1999;1(3):424–425. 3. [PubMed]
75. Lillo FB, Ferrari D, Veglia F, Origoni M, Grasso MA, Lodini S, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and associated cervical disease in HIV-infected women: Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2001;184(5):547–551. [PubMed]
76. Minkoff H, Ahdieh L, Massad LS, Anastos K, Watts DH, Melnick S, et al. The effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on cervical cytologic changes associated with oncogenic HPV among HIV-infected women. AIDS. 2001;12(16):2157–2164. [PubMed]
77. Ahdieh-Grant L, Li R, Levine AM, Massad LS, Strickler HD, Minkoff H, Moxley M, Palefsky J, Sacks H, Burk RD, Gange SJ. Highly antiretroviral therapy and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(14):1051–1053. [PubMed]
78. Schiffman M, Bauer H, Hoover R, Glass A, Cadell D, rush B, et al. epidemiologic evidence showing that HPV infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasias. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(12):958–964. [PubMed]
79. Jamieson DJ, Duerr A, Burk R, Klein RS, Paramsothy P, Schuman P, Cu-Uvin S, Shah K. for the HIV Epidemiology Research Study (HERS) Group. Characterization of genital HPV infection in women who have or who are at risk of having HIV infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(1):21–27. [PubMed]
80. Ahdieh L, Klein RS, Burk R, Cu-Uvin S, Schuman P, Duerr A, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and type-specific persistence of HPV in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. J Infect Dis. 2001;184(6):682–690. [PubMed]
81. Viscidi RP, Ahdieh-Grant L, Clayman B, Fox K, Massad LS, Cu-Uvin S, Shah KV, Anastos KM, Squires KE, Duerr A, Jamieson DJ, Burk RD, Klein RS, Minkoff H, Palefsky J, Strickler H, Schuman P, Piessens E, Miotti P. Serum immunoglobin G response to HPV type 16 virus-like particles in HIV-positive and risk-matched HIV-negative women. JID. 2003;187(2):194–205. [PubMed]
82. Strickler HD, Burk RD, Fazzari M, Anastos K, Minkoff H, Massad LS, Hall C, Bacon M, Levine AM, Watts DH, Silverberg MJ, Xue X, Schlecht NF, Melnick S, Palefsky JM. Natural history and possible reactivation of human papillomavirus in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(8):577–586. [PubMed]
83. Vernon SD, Hart CE, Reeves WC, Icenogle JP. The HIV-1 tat protein enhances E2-dependent human papillomavirus transmission. Virus Res. 1993;27(2):133–145. [PubMed]
84. Spinillo A, Tenti P, Zappatore R, De Seta F, Silini E, Guaschino S. Langerhans’ cell counts and cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in women with HIV infection. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;48(2):210–213. [PubMed]
85. Rosini S, Caltagirone S, Tallini G, Lattanzio G, Demopoulos R, Piantelli M, et al. Depletion of stromal and intraepithelial antigen-presenting cells in cervical neoplasias in HIV infection. Hum Pathol. 1996;27(8):834–838. [PubMed]
86. Kobayashi A, Darragh T, Herndier B, Anastos K, Minkoff H, Cohen M, et al. Lymphoid follicles are generated in high-grade cervical dysplasia and have differing characteristics depending on HIV status. Am J Pathol. 2002;160(1):151–164. [PubMed]
87. Fruchter RG, Maiman M, Sillman FH, Camilien L, Webber CA, Kim DS. Characteristics of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(2):531–537. [PubMed]
88. Alloub MI, Barr BB, McLaren KM, Smith IW, Bunney MH, Smart GE. HPV infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in women with renal allografts. BMJ. 1989;298(6667):153–156. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
89. Cordiner JW, Sharp F, Briggs J. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in immunosuppressed women after renal transplantation. Scott Med J. 1980;25(4):275–277. [PubMed]
90. Maiman M, Tarricone N, Viera J, et al. Colposcopic evaluation of HIV seropositive women. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(1):84–88. [PubMed]
91. Del Priore G, Maag T, Bhattacharya M, et al. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56(3):395–398. [PubMed]
92. Korn AP, Autry M, De Remer PA, Tan W. Sensitivity of the Papanicolaou smear in HIV-infected women. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(3):401–404. [PubMed]
93. Adachi A, Fleming I, Burk RD, Ho GY, Klein RS. Women with HIV infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: A prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(3):372–377. [PubMed]
94. Massad LS, Schneider M, Watts H, Darragh T, Abulafia O, Salzer E, et al. Correlating Papanicolaou smears, colposcopic impression, and biopsy: Results from the Women’s Interagency HIV Study. J Lower Genital Tract Dis. 2001;5:212–218. [PubMed]
95. Branca M, Rossi E, Alderisio M, Migliore G, Morosini PL, Vecchione A, Sopracordevole F, Mudu P, Leoncini L, Syrjanen K. Performance of cytology and colposcopy in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. Cytopathology. 2001;12(2):84–93. [PubMed]
96. 1999 USPHS/IDSA guidelines for the prevention of opportunistic infections in persons infected with the HIV. MMWR. 2000;48:1–66. [PubMed]
97. Goldie S, Weinstein M, Kuntz K, Freedberg K. The costs, clinical benefits, and cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in HIV-infected women. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(2):97–107. [PubMed]
98. Goldie SJ, Freedberg KA, Weinstein MC, Wright TC, Kuntz KM. Cost effectiveness of HPV testing to augment cervical cancer screening in women infected with the HIV. Am J Med. 2001;111(2):140–149. [PubMed]
99. Cuzick J, Sasieni P, Davies P, et al. A systematic review of the role of HPV testing within a cervical screening programme. Health Technol Assess. 1993;3:1–196. [PubMed]
100. de Sanjose S, Palefsky J. Cervical and anal HPV infections in HIV positive women and men. Virus Res. 2002;89(2):201–211. [PubMed]
101. Mathews WC. Screening for anal dysplasia associated with HPV. Top HIV Med. 2003;11(2):45–49. [PubMed]
102. Moscicki AB, Durako SJ, Houser J, Ma Y, Murphy DA, Darragh TM, Farhat S, Wilson CM. HPV infection and abnormal cytology of the anus in HIV-infected and uninfected adolescents. AIDS. 2003;17(3):311–320. [PubMed]
103. Harris TG, Burk RD, Palefsky JM, Massad LS, Bang JY, Anastos K, Minkoff H, Hall CB, Bacon MC, Levine AM, Watts DH, Silverberg MJ, Xue X, Melnick SL, Strickler HD. Incidence of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions associated with HIV serostatus, CD4 cell counts, and human papillomavirus test results. JAMA. 2005;293(12):1471–1476. [PubMed]
104. Del Priore G, Gilmore PR, Maag T, Warshal DP, Cheon TH. Colposcopic biopsies versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure cone histology in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(9):653–657. [PubMed]
105. Cuthill S, Maiman M, Fruchter RG, Lopatinsky I, Cheng CC. Complications after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in women infected with the HIV. J Reprod Med. 1995;40(12):823–828. [PubMed]
106. Williams FS, Roure RM, Till M, Vogler M, Del Priore G. Treatment of cervical carcinoma in situ in HIV positive women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71(2):135–139. [PubMed]
107. Maiman M, Fruchter RG, Serur E, Levine A, Arrastia CD, Sedlis A. Recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in HIV-seroposiitve women. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82(2):170–174. [PubMed]
108. Robinson WR, Andersen J, Darragh TM, Kendall MA, Clark R, Maiman M. Isotretinoin for low-grade cervical dysplasia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(5 Pt 1):777–784. [PubMed]
109. Cejtin HE, Komaroff E, Massad LS, Korn A, Schmidt JB, Eisenberger-Matiyahu D, et al. Adherence to colposcopy among women with HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;22(3):247–252. [PubMed]
110. Heard I, Bergeron C, Jeannel D, Henrion R, Kazatchkine MD. Papanicolaou smears in HIV-seropositive women during follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(5):749–753. [PubMed]
111. Fruchter RG, Maiman M, Sedlis A, Bartley L, Camilien L, Arrastia CD. Multiple recurrences of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in women with the HIV. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(3):338–344. [PubMed]
112. Wright TC, Koulos J, Schnoll F, Swanbeck J, Ellerbrock TV, Chiasson LA, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias in women infected with the HIV: Outcome after loop electrosurgical excision. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;55(2):253–258. [PubMed]
113. Massad LS, Fazzari MJ, Anastos K, et al. Outcomes after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women with HIV. J Lower Genit Tract Dis. 2007;11(2):90–97. [PubMed]
114. Maiman M, Watts DH, Andersen J, Clax P, Merino M, Kendall MA. Vaginal 5-fluorouracil for high-grade cervical dysplasia in human immunodeficiency virus infection: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(6):954–961. [PubMed]
115. Fiore JR, Suligoi B, Saracino A, et al. Correlates of HIV-1 shedding in cervicovaginal secretions and effects of antiretroviral therapies. AIDS. 2003;17(15):2169–2176. [PubMed]
116. Spinillo A, Debiaggi M, Zara F, Maserati R, Polatti F, De Santolo A. Factors associated with nucleic acids related to HIV type 1 in cervico-vaginal secretions. BJOG. 2001;108(6):634–641. [PubMed]
117. Massad LS, Evans CT, Wilson TE, et al. Contraceptive use among U.S. women with HIV. J Womens Health. 2007;16(5):657–666. [PubMed]
118. Raiford JL, Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Correlates of consistent condom use among HIV-positive African American women. Women Health. 2007;46(2–3):41–58. [PubMed]
119. Hatcher RA, Trussel J, Stewart F, et al. Contraceptive Technology. 16th edition. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc; 1994. pp. 154–155.
120. Weller SC. A meta-analysis of condom effectiveness in reducing sexually transmitted HIV. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(12):1635–1644. [PubMed]
121. Allen S, Meinzen-Derr J, Kautzman M, Zulu I, Trask S, Fideli U, et al. Sexual behavior of HIV discordant couples after HIV counseling and testing. AIDS. 2003;17(5):733–740. [PubMed]
122. de Vincenzi I. and the European Study Group. A longitudinal study of human immunodeficiency virus transmission by heterosexual partners. European Study Group on heterosexual transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(6):341–346. [PubMed]
123. O’Farrell N. Enhanced efficiency of female-to-male HIV transmission in core groups in developing countries: the need to target men. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(2):84. [PubMed]
124. Lauby JL, Semaan S, O'Connell A, Person B, Vogel A. Factors related to self-efficacy for use of condoms and birth control among women at risk for HIV infection. Women Health. 2001;34(3):71–91. [PubMed]
125. Semaan S, Lauby J, Walls C. Condom use with main partners by sterilized and non-sterilized women. Women Health. 1997;25(2):65–85. [PubMed]
126. McConnell JJ, Grant RM, Greenwood G. Concerns about HIV superinfection and the sexual practices of seroconcordant couples [abstract C10929]. International AIDS Conference; Bangkok. 2004.
127. Goedert JJ, Eyster ME, Biggar RJ, Blattner WA. Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus: association with severe depletion of T-helper lymphocytes in men with hemophilia. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1987;3(4):355–361. [PubMed]
128. Smith DM, Richman DD, Little SJ. HIV superinfection. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:438–444. [PubMed]
129. Manhart LE, Koutsky LA. Do condoms prevent genital HPV infection, external genital warts, or cervical neoplasias? A meta-analysis. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(11):725. [PubMed]
130. Soper DE, Shoupe D, Shangold GA, Shangold MM, Gutmann J, Mercer L. Prevention of vaginal trichomoniasis by compliant use of the female condom. Sex Transm Dis. 1993;20(3):137–139. [PubMed]
131. Update: barrier protection against HIV infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993 Aug 6;42(30):589–591. 597. [PubMed]
132. Mitchell HS, Stephens E. Contraception choice for HIV positive women. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(3):167–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
133. Miller CJ, Alexander NJ, Gettie A, Hendrickx AG, Marx PA. The effect of contraceptives containing nonoxynol-9 on the genital transmission of simian immunodeficiency virus in rhesus macaques. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(5):1126–1128. [PubMed]
134. Kreiss J, Ngugi E, Holmes K, Ndinya-Achola J, Waiyaki P, Roberts PL, et al. Efficacy of nonoxynol 9 contraceptive sponge use in preventing heterosexual acquisition of HIV in Nairobi prostitutes. JAMA. 1992;268(4):477–448. [PubMed]
135. Wittkowski KM, Susser E, Dietz K. The protective effect of condoms and nonoxynnol-9 against HIV infection. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(4):590–596. [PubMed]
136. Cook RL, Rosenberg MJ. Do spermicides containing nonoxynol-9 prevent sexually transmitted infections? A meta-analysis. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25(3):144–150. [PubMed]
137. Kilmarx PH, van de Wijgert JH, Chaikummao S, et al. Safety and acceptability of the candidate microbicide Carraguard in Thai Women: findings from a Phase II Clinical Trial. JAIDS. 2006;43(3):327–334. [PubMed]
138. Kell PD, Barton SE, Edmonds DK, Boag FC. HIV infection in a patient with Meyer-Rokitansky-Hauser syndrome. J R Soc Med. 1992;85(11):706–707. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
139. Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Poindexter AN., 3rd Planned condom use among women undergoing tubal sterilization. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25(7):335–341. [PubMed]
140. Diaz T, Schable B, Chu SY. Relationship between use of condoms and other forms of contraception among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. Supplement to HIV and AIDS Surveillance Project Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(2):277–282. [PubMed]
141. Krieger JN, Nirapathpongporn A, Chaiyaporn M, Peterson G, Nikolaeva I, Akridge R, et al. Vasectomy and HIV type 1 in semen. J Urol. 1998;159(3):820–825. [PubMed]
142. Stuart GS, Castano PM, Sheffield JS, et al. Postpartum sterilization choices made by HIV-infected women. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2005;13(4):217–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
143. European Study Group on Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. Comparison of female to male and male to female transmission of HIV in 563 stable couples. BMJ. 1992;304:809–813. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
144. Richardson BA, Morrison CS, Sekadde-Kigondu C, Sinei SK, Overbaugh J, Panteleeff DD, et al. Effect of intrauterine device use on cervical shedding of HIV-1 DNA. AIDS. 1999;13(15):2091–2097. [PubMed]
145. World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use Second Edition. Geneva: 2000.
146. Morrison CS, Sekadde-Kigondu C, Sinei SK, Weiner DH, Kwok C, Kokonya D. Is the intrauterine device appropriate contraception for HIV-1-infected women? BJOG. 2001;108(8):784–790. [PubMed]
147. Heikinheimo O, Lehtovirta P, Suni J, et al. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in HIV-infected women—effects on bleeding patterns, ovarian function and genital shedding of HIV. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(11):2857–2861. [PubMed]
148. Stringer EM, Kaseba C, Levy J, et al. A randomized trial of the intrauterine contraceptive device vs hormonal contraception in women who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(2) 144.e1-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
149. World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. Geneva: 2004.
150. Wang CC, Reilly M, Kreiss JK. Risk of HIV infection in oral contraceptive pill users: a meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;21(2):51–58. [PubMed]
151. Grossman CJ. Regulation of the immune system by sex steroids. Endocrine Reviews. 1984;5(3):435–455. [PubMed]
152. Mitra D, Sikder SK, Laurence J. Role of glucocorticoid receptor binding sites in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat in steroid-mediated suppression of HIV gene expression. Virology. 1995;214(2):512–521. [PubMed]
153. Marx PA, Spira AI, Gettie A, Dailey PJ, Veazey RS, Lackner AA, et al. Progesterone implants enhance SIV vaginal transmission and early virus load. Nat Med. 1996;2(10):1084–1089. [PubMed]
154. Greenblatt RM, Ameli N, Grant RM, Bacchetti P, Taylor RN. Impact of the ovulatory cycle on virologic and immunologic markers in HIV-infected women. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(1):82–90. [PubMed]
155. Cejtin HE, Jacobson L, Springer G, Watts DH, Levine A, Greenblatt R, et al. Effect of hormonal contraceptive use on plasma HIV-1-RNA levels among HIV-infected women. AIDS. 2003;17(11):1702–1704. [PubMed]
156. Landers DV, Martinez de Tejada B, Coyne BA. Immunology of HIV and pregnancy. The effects of each on the other. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997;24(4):821–831. [PubMed]
157. Bessinger R, Clark R, Kissinger P, Rice J, Coughlin S. Pregnancy is not associated with the progression of HIV disease in women attending an HIV outpatient program. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(5):434–440. [PubMed]
158. Weisser M, Rudin C, Battegay M, Pfluger D, Kully C, Egger M. Does pregnancy influence the course of HIV infection? Evidence from two large Swiss cohort studies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retroviral. 1998;17(5):404–411. [PubMed]
159. Saada M, Le Chenadec J, Berrebi A, Bongain A, Delfraissey JF, Mayaux MJ, et al. Pregnancy and progression to AIDS: results of the French prospective cohorts. AIDS. 2000;14(15):2355–2360. [PubMed]
160. Richardson BA, Otieno PA, Mbori-Ngacha D, et al. Hormonal contraception and HIV-1 disease progression among postpartum Kenyan women. AIDS. 2007;21(6):749–753. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
161. de Maat MM, Ekhart GC, Huitema AD, Koks CH, Mulder JW, Beijnen JH. Drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and comedicated agents. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(3):223–282. [PubMed]
162. Piscitelli SC, Gallicano KD. Interactions among drugs for HIV and opportunistic infections. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(13):984–996. [PubMed]
163. Grange J, Winstanley P, Davies P. Clinically significant drug interactions with antituberculosis agents. Drug Saf. 1994;11(4):242. [PubMed]
164. Catanzaro LM, Morse GC. Data from clinical trials. JAIDS. 2005;38 Suppl 1:S26–S29. [PubMed]
165. Ouellet D, Hsu A, Qian J, Locke CS, Eason CJ, Cavanaugh JH, et al. Effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol in healthy female volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46(2):111–116. [PubMed]
166. Mildvan D, Yarrish R, Marshak A, Hutman HW, McDonough M, Lamson M, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between nevirapine and ethinyl estradiol/norethindrone when administered concurrently to HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;29(5):471–477. [PubMed]
167. Clark RA, Theall K. Population-based study evaluating association between selected antiretroviral therapies and potential oral contraceptive failure. JAIDS. 2004;37(1):1219–1220. [PubMed]
168. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adult and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008. Jan 29, pp. 1–128. Available at http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.
169. Watts DH, Park JG, Cohn SE, et al. Safety and tolerability of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate among HIV-infected women on antiretroviral therapy: ACTG A5093. Contraception. 2008;77(2):84–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
170. Chu JH, Gange SJ, Anastos K, et al. Hormonal contraceptive use and the effectiveness of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(9):881–890. [PubMed]
171. Massad LS, Evans C, Weber K, et al. Hysterectomy among women with HIV: indications and incidence. JAIDS. 2007;44(5):566–568. [PubMed]
172. Irwin KL, Moorman AC, O’Sullivan MJ, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(4):525–534. [PubMed]
173. Cohn SE, Clark RA. Sexually transmitted diseases, HIV, and AIDS in women. Med Clin North Am. 2003;87(5):971–995. [PubMed]
174. Fiore S, newell ML, Thorne C. European HIV in Obstetrics Group. Higher rates of postpartum complications in HIV-infected than in uninfected women irrespective of mode of delivery. AIDS. 2004;18(6):933–938. [PubMed]
175. Horberg MA, Hurley LB, Klein DB, et al. Surgical outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Arch Surg. 2006;141(12):1238–1245. [PubMed]
176. Tebas P, Powderly WG, Claxton S, et al. Accelerated bone mineral loss in HIV-infected patients receiving potent antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2000;14(4):F63–F67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
177. Pan G, Wu X, McKenna MA, et al. AZT enhances osteoclastogenesis and bone loss. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004;20(6):608–620. [PubMed]
178. Van Rompay KK, Brignolo LL, Meyer DJ, et al. Biological effects of short-term or prolonged administration of 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl.]adenine (tenofovir) to newborn and infant rhesus macaques. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1469–1487. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
179. Dolan SE, Kanter JR, Grinspoon S. Longitudinal analysis of bone density in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):2938–2945. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
180. Yin M, Dobkin J, Brudney K, et al. Bone mass and mineral metabolism in HIV+ postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(11):1345–1352. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
181. Moore AL, Vashisht A, Sabin CA, et al. Reduced bone mineral density in HIV-positive individuals. AIDS. 2001;15(13):1732–1733. [PubMed]
182. Bongiovanni M, Tincati C. Bone diseases associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection: pathogenesis, risk factors and clinical management. Curr Mol Med. 2006;6(4):395–400. [PubMed]
183. Soler Palacin P, Torrent A, Rossich R, et al. Osteoporosis and multiple fractures in an antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-positive child. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2007;20(8):933–938. [PubMed]
184. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012. [PubMed]
185. Brown, Todd T, Qaqish, et al. Antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis: a meta-analytic review. AIDS. 2006;20(17):2165–2174. [PubMed]
186. Fausto A, Bongiovanni M, Cicconi P, et al. Potential predictive factors of osteoporosis in HIV-positive subjects. Bone. 2006;8(6):893–897. [PubMed]
187. Dolan SE, Carpenter S, Grinspoon S. Effects of weight, body composition, and testosterone on bone mineral density in HIV-infected women. JAIDS. 2007;45(2):161–167. [PubMed]
188. Teichmann J, Stephan E, Lange U, et al. Osteopenia in HIV-infected women prior to highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect. 2003;46(4):221–227. [PubMed]
189. Lin D, Rieder MJ. Interventions for the treatment of decreased bone mineral density associated with HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2) CD005645. [PubMed]
190. McComsey GA, Kendall MA, Tebas P, et al. Alendronate with calcium and vitamin D supplementation is safe and effective for the treatment of decreased bone mineral density in HIV. AIDS. 2007;21(18):2473–2482. [PubMed]
191. Mondy K, Powderly WG, Claxton SA. Alendronate, vitamin D, and calcium for the treatment of osteopenia/osteoporosis associated with HIV infection. JAIDS. 2005;38(4):426–431. [PubMed]
192. Negredo E, Martinez-Lopez E, Paredes R, et al. Reversal of HIV=1-associated osteoporosis with once-weekly alendronate. AIDS. 2005;19(3):343–345. [PubMed]
193. ACOG Technical Bulletin #50. Osteoporosis. 2004 January
194. Chen JL, Philips KA, Kanouse DE, et al. Fertility desires and intentions of HIV-positive men and women. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33(4):144–152. [PubMed]
195. Stanwood NL, Cohn SE, heiser JR, et al. Contraception and fertility plans in a cohort of HIV-positive women in case. Contraception. 2007;75(4):294–298. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
196. Coll O, Lopez M, Vidal R, et al. Fertility assessment in non-infertile HIV-infected women and their partners. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(4):488–494. [PubMed]
197. Dulioust E, Du AL, Costagliola D, et al. Semen alterations in HIV-1 infected men. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(8):2112–2118. [PubMed]
198. Nicopoullos JD, Almeida PA, Ramsay JW, et al. The effect of human immunodeficiency virus on sperm parameters and the outcome of intrauterine insemination following sperm washing. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2289–2297. [PubMed]
199. Klein J, Pena JE, Thornton MH, et al. Understanding the motivations, concerns, and desires of human immunodeficiency virus 1-serodiscordant couples wishing to have children through assisted reproduction. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(5 Pt 1):987–994. [PubMed]
200. Marina S, Marina F, Alcolea R, et al. Pregnancy following intracytoplasmic sperm injection from an HIV-1-seropositive man. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(11):3247–3249. [PubMed]
201. Coombs RW, Speck CE, Hughes JP, et al. Association between culturable human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in semen and HIV-1 RNA levels in semen and blood: evidence for compartmentalization of HIV-1 between semen and blood. J infect Dis. 1998;177(2):320–330. [PubMed]
202. Vernazza P, Brenner I, Graf I, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis and timed intercourse for HIV-discordant couples willing to conceive a child; 4th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention; July 22-5; Sydney, Australia. 2007. Abstract MOPDCO1.
203. Vernazza PL, Hollander L, Semprini AE, et al. HIV-discordant couples and parenthood: how are we dealing with the risk of transmission? AIDS. 2006;20(4):635–636. [PubMed]
204. Smith SM, Mefford M, Sodora D, et al. Topical estrogen protects against SIV vaginal transmission without evidence of systemic effect. AIDS. 2004;18(12):1637–1643. [PubMed]
205. Semprini AE, Levi-Setti P, Bozzo M, et al. Insemination of HIV-negative women with processed semen of HIV-positive partners. Lancet. 1992;340(8831):1317–1319. [PubMed]
206. Stewart GJ, Tyler JP, Cunningham AL, et al. Transmission of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III) by artificial insemination by donor. Lancet. 1985;2(8455):581–585. [PubMed]
207. Epidemiologic Notes and Reports HIV-1 Infection and Artificial Insemination with Processed Semen. MMWR. 1990 April 20;39(15):249, 255–256. [PubMed]
208. Zhu T, Wang N, Carr A, et al. Genetic characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in blood and genital secretions: evidence for viral compartmentalization and selection during sexual transmission. J Virol. 1996;70(5):3098–3107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
209. Liuzzi G, Chirianni A, Clementi M, et al. Analysis of HIV-1 load in blood, semen and saliva: evidence for different viral compartments in a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. AIDS. 1996;10(14):F51–F56. [PubMed]
210. Sauer M. American physicians remain slow to embrace the reproductive needs of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):295–297. [PubMed]
211. Zhang H, Dornadula G, Beumont M, et al. NEJM. 1998;339(25):1803–1809. [PubMed]
212. Frodsham LC, Boag F, Barton S, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus infection and fertility care in the United Kingdom: demand and supply. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):285–289. [PubMed]
213. Kato S, Hanabusa H, Kaneko S, et al. Complete removal of HIV-1 RNA and proviral DNA from semen by the swim-up method: assisted reproduction technique using spermatozoa free from HIV-1. AIDS. 2006;20(7):967–973. [PubMed]
214. Melo MA, Meseguer M, Bellver J, et al. Human immunodeficiency type-1 virus (HIV-1) infection in serodiscordant couples (SDCs) does not have an impact on embryo quality or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):141–150. [PubMed]
215. Lyerly AD, Faden RR. HIV and assisted reproductive technology: women and healthcare policy. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3(1):41–43. [PubMed]
216. Daar ES, Daar JF. Human immunodeficiency virus and fertility care: embarking on a path of knowledge and access. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):298–300. [PubMed]
217. Tedder RS, Zuckerman MA, Goldstone AH, et al. Lancet. 1995;346(8968):137–140. [PubMed]
218. Stern JE, Cramer CP, Garrod A, et al. Attitudes on access to services at assisted reproductive technology clinics: comparisons with clinic policy. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(3):537–541. [PubMed]
219. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Human immunodeficiency virus and infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 2004;82 Suppl 1:S228–S231. [PubMed]
220. Sexually Transmitted Disease Guidelines—2002. MMWR. 2002;51(RR06):1–80.
221. Weiss H. Epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in the developing world. Herpes. 2004;11 Suppl 1:24A–35A. [PubMed]
222. Strick LB, Wald A, Celum C. Management of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in HIV type 1-infected persons. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(3):347–356. [PubMed]
223. Tyring SK, Baker D, Snowden W. Valacyclovir for herpes simplex virus infection: long-term safety and sustained efficacy after 20 years’experience with acyclovir. J Infect Dis. 2002;186 Suppl 1:S40–S46. [PubMed]
224. Reyes M, Shaik NS, Graber JM, et al. Acyclovir-resistant genital herpes among persons attending sexually transmitted disease and human immunodeficiency virus clinics. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(1):76–80. [PubMed]
225. Corey L, Wald A, Celum CL, et al. The effects of herpes simplex virus-2 on HIV-1 acquisition and transmission: a review of two overlapping epidemics. JAIDS. 2004;35(5):435–445. [PubMed]
226. Chesson HW, Pinkerton SD, Voigt R, Counts GW. HIV infections and associated costs attributable to syphilis coinfection among African Americans. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):943–948. [PubMed]
227. Manavi K, McMillan A. The outcome of treatment of early latent syphilis and syphilis with undetermined duration in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients. Int J STD AIDS. 2007;18(12):814–818. [PubMed]
228. Ghanem KG, Erbelding EJ, Wiener ZS, et al. Serological response to syphilis treatment in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(2):97–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
229. Libois A, k De Wit S, Poll B, et al. HIV and syphilis: when to perform a lumbar puncture. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(3):141–144. [PubMed]
230. Zetola NM, Engelman J, Jensen TP, et al. Syphilis in the United States: an update for clinicians with an emphasis on HIV coinfection. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(11):1434. [PubMed]
231. Hoegsberg B, Abulafia O, Sedlis A, Feldman J, DesJalais D, Landeman S, et al. Sexually transmitted diseases and HIV infection among women with pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(4 Pt 1):1135. [PubMed]
232. Kamenga MC, De Cock KM, St Louis M, Toure CK, Zakaria S, N’gbichi JM, et al. The impact of HIV infection on pelvic inflammatory disease: A case-control study in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(3):919–925. [PubMed]
233. Korn AP, Landers DL, Green JR, et al. Pelvic inflammatory disease in HIV-infected women. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82(5):765. [PubMed]
234. Quazi MA. Lethal outcome of pelvic inflammatory disease in five women who were seropositive for HIV. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(1):67–69. [PubMed]
235. Cohen CR, Sinei S, Reilly M, Bukusi E, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK, et al. Effect of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection upon acute salpingitis: a laparoscopic study. J Infect Dis. 1998;178(5):1352–1358. [PubMed]
236. Bukusi EA, Cohen CR, Stevens CE, Sinei S, Reilly M, Grieco V, et al. Effects of human immunodeficiency virus 1 infection on microbial origins of pelvic inflammatory disease and on efficacy of ambulatory oral therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1374–1381. [PubMed]
237. Irwin KL, Moorman AC, O'Sullivan MJ, Sperling R, Koestler ME, Soto I, et al. Influence of human immunodeficiency virus infection on pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(4):525–534. [PubMed]
238. Mugo NR, Kiehlbauch JA, Nguti R, et al. Effect of human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection on treatment outcome of acute salpingitis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):807–812. [PubMed]