PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Curr Opin Biotechnol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Dec 1, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2646611
NIHMSID: NIHMS83886
De Novo Designed Synthetic Mimics of Antimicrobial Peptides
Richard W. Scott,* William F. DeGrado,# and Gregory N. Tew+
*PolyMedix, Inc., 170 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Suite 300, Radnor, PA 19087, Fax: 484-598-2401; Tel: 484-598-2336; E-mail: rscott/at/polymedix.com
# Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 1009 Stellar Chance Building, 36th & Hamilton Walk Philadelphia, PA 19104-6059, Fax: 215 573 7229; Tel: 215 898 4590; E-mail: wdegrado/at/mail.med.upenn.edu
+Department of Polymer Science & Engineering, University of Massachusetts-Amherst 120 Governor's Drive, Amherst, MA 01003, USA, Fax: 413 545 0082; Tel: 413 577 1612; E-mail: tew/at/mail.pse.umass.edu
Antimicrobial peptides are small cationic amphiphiles that play an important role in the innate immune system. Given their broad specificity, they appear to be ideal therapeutic agents. As a result, over the last decade, there has been considerable interest in developing them as intravenously administered antibiotics. However, it has proven difficult to accomplish this goal with peptide-based structures. While it has been possible to solve some relatively simple problems such as susceptibility to proteolysis, more severe problems have included the expense of the materials, toxicity, limited efficacy, and limited tissue distribution. As a result, we developed small synthetic oligomers designed to adopt amphiphilic conformations and exhibit potent antimicrobial activity while being non-toxic to host cells. One class of these synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides (SMAMPs) is being developed as intravenous antibiotics
Antimicrobial peptides
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), isolated from organisms across the phylogenetic spectrum, are an important part of the innate immune system.[1] They are typically small (12-80 amino acids) cationic amphiphiles that provide protection against a wide variety of pathogenic organisms, are the first line of defense against microbial infection in many species and are particularly important for infection control in insects and plants, which lack an adaptive immune response based on T-cells and antibodies. Many excellent reviews are available.[1-4] In mammals, the peptides are produced and secreted in skin, mucosal surfaces and neutrophils, and act locally in response to infection. There are two types of AMPs comprising ribosomally and nonribosomally synthesized peptides. Over 700 AMPs have been identified and are generally α-helical (magainin and cecropin) or disulfide-rich β-sheets (bactenecin and defensin). Despite the large diversity observed in AMPs, they generally adopt highly amphiphilic topologies in which the hydrophilic and hydrophobic side chains segregate into distinctly opposing regions or faces of the molecule - referred to as facially amphiphilic. Figure 1 highlights this facially amphiphilic structure for Magainin 2. Numerous studies with linear and cyclic peptides have strongly supported the hypothesis that their physicochemical properties, rather than any precise sequence, are responsible for their activities. It is generally believed that this amphiphilic topology is essential for insertion into and disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane leading to bacteria death.[2]
Figure. 1
Figure. 1
(left) Magainin 2 shown with cationic groups in blue and nonpolar groups in green. The peptide backbone is shown as a yellow ribbon. (left) De novo designed SMAMP which captures the facially amphiphilic architecture and critical physicochemical properties (more ...)
Several models, such as the toroidal pore, carpet-like, and barrel stave, have been proposed to explain the complex structures formed between lipids and various AMPs during their interactions with membrane lipids (see references for detail of these mechanisms).[1,5-7] None of the proposed mechanisms are receptor based, consistent with the findings that all D-peptides are generally as active as all L-peptides.[8,9] In addition, certain AMPs have been proposed to indirectly modulate antimicrobial activity by interacting with other components of the innate immune system (reviewed in[10,11]). It is unclear which of these events are primarily responsible for bacterial killing and multiple target models have been proposed with the exact mechanism being dependent on the peptide, concentration, and bacterium in question.[12-14] Bacteria have also been shown to respond to AMPs[15,16] and even evolve novel resistance to their toxic affects.[17],[18] Nevertheless, AMPs have remained an effective weapon against bacterial infection over evolutionary time indicating that their mechanism of action thwarts bacterial responses, which lead to overall resistance.
Mimetics of the AMPs
Given their broad specificity, amphiphilic antimicrobial peptides appear to be ideal therapeutic agents. Over the last decade, there has been considerable interest in developing AMPs as intravenously administered antibiotics. However, despite extensive efforts in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry, it has proven difficult to accomplish this goal.[2] As a first step in this direction, various workers designed antimicrobial peptides by idealizing the amphiphilic alpha-helical arrangement of sidechains[19-21] observed in the natural structures, leading to a large number of potent and selective antimicrobial compounds.[3] Also, cyclic peptides,[22] turn-forming, and hairpin forming peptides[19-21,23,24] have been extensively studied, but are beyond the scope of this review [see [25] for a recent review].
Peptidomimetic approaches that mimic the peptide primary structure have been pursued using amide bond isosteres or modifications of the peptide backbone by chain extension or heteroatom incorporation.[26] Several groups designed β-peptides (peptides built from β-amino acids with an additional methylene group in their backbone relative to α-amino acids), which maintained this amphiphilic architecture.[27],[28] [29] A systematic analysis of β-peptide structure and activity revealed that facial amphiphilicity as well as a precise ratio of charged to hydrophobic residues was essential for potent and selective activity, similar to what has been described for the antimicrobial α-peptides.[30,31] Both diastereomeric (D-amino acid substitutions) peptide sequences and α/β-peptides that did not adopt globally amphiphilic helices showed antimicrobial activity suggesting a well-defined amphiphilic secondary structure was not essential.[29,32] Although these peptides may be unable to adopt regular α-helix structures, their potent antibacterial activity may well require the presence of highly flexible backbones to permit formation of irregular but globally amphiphilic conformations upon interaction with membranes. Helical, cationic, facially-amphiphilic peptoid mimics (poly-N-substituted glycine) of magainin-2 have also been produced that show selective and potent antibacterial activity against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria.[33] Significantly, the β-peptides and peptoids are resistant to proteases, providing important advantages over alpha-peptides. However, β-peptides and peptoids are relatively difficult and expensive to synthesize in large quantities.
Shai and coworkers have explored the use of short basic peptides with an N-terminal fatty acyl chain as potential antimicrobials[34,35] (for a review see: [35]). Linear oligomers containing alternating acyl chains and cationic amino acid (lysine) residues have been shown to be active against Gram-negative bacteria. The addition of an acyl group to the N-terminus enhanced potency, leading to a molecule active in vivo in a mouse peritonitis models.[53,54]. Recently, this group described a series of palmitoylated di, tri, and tetrapeptides[36,37] with varying specificities for a variety of bacteria and fungi. These lipopeptides assemble into nanostructures that might be related to their biological activities.
Non-peptidic compounds that are facially amphiphilic have also been produced from a steroid scaffold.[38] [39] These compounds, termed ceragenins, have antibacterial activities similar to AMPs, but unsatisfactory safety profiles have limited their use to topical and medical devise applications. [40] Polymeric molecules have attracted significant attention recently as progress toward biomimetic macromolecules continues. Several polymers have been synthesized that likely adopt amphiphilic structures in membrane environments and further confirm that well-defined amphiphilic secondary structures are not essential. These include phenylene ethynylene,[41-43] short polymethacrylate,[44,45] beta-lactam,[46] and polynorbornene backbones[47-50] that are active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and have lower hemolytic activities against human erythrocytes. Such compounds are not preferred for systemic therapeutic use but their ease and economical cost of synthesis make them highly suitable for many material applications to create antimicrobial surfaces and products.[51,52]
Design of aryl and heteroaryl-amide antimicrobial peptide mimetics
The goal of our synthetic approach was to capture the structural and biological properties of antimicrobial peptides within the framework of inexpensive oligomers.[55] While it has been possible to solve some relatively simple problems such as susceptibility to proteolysis, more severe problems have included the expense of the materials, toxicity, limited efficacy, and limited tissue distribution. We reasoned that small synthetic oligomers that adopt amphiphilic secondary structures while exhibiting potent and selective antimicrobial activity would be less expensive to produce, they might have better tissue distribution, and that it would be much easier to fine-tune their structures and activities to minimize toxicity. Therefore, an active program to de novo design synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides (SMAMPs) from inexpensive synthetic oligomers was undertaken (see Fig. 1). This effort has led to the identification of a class of SMAMPs that possess efficacy, safety and pharmaceutical qualities suitable for development as intravenous antibiotics.
In general, de novo design of oligomers was accomplished in several steps. We first defined a three-dimensional framework, or backbone, using molecular dynamics and quantum force field calculations to assure it was able to assume a semi-rigid conformation.[55-60] Next, side groups were added computationally to maximize diversity and maintain drug-like properties. The best combinations of functional groups were then computationally selected to produce a cationic, amphiphilic structures.[59] Representative compounds were synthesized from this selected library to evaluate their activities. In our initial studies, we prepared compounds related to the core structure 1, which contained alternating 1,3 phenylene diamine units connected by a isophthalic acid.[55]
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms83886u1.jpg Object name is nihms83886u1.jpg
Once an active series had been established, the activity was optimized by increasing the rigidity of the backbone through hydrogen-bonding and/or introduction of new substituents as shown with the arylamides in Figure 2. Hydrogen bonding in the backbone does not appear to be essential as the phenylene ethynylene was highly active.[61-63]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative SMAMPs highlighting design principles leading to potent in vivo activity.
Mechanism of Membrane Activity
Understanding the interactions between SMAMPs and lipid bilayers are a complicated, multi-component problem yet scientifically important. Beyond understanding the structure-function correlation of SMAMPs, learning how these unique molecules interact with lipid membranes will contribute to our fundamental understanding of molecular-membrane self-assemblies which are critically important for numerous biological processes. Bacterial membranes and mammalian cell membranes are very distinct with respect to their phospholipid compositions.[64] It was shown that the exact lipid type influenced the leakage of calcein loaded vesicles and that specifically the presence of ‘bacterial’ type lipids was essential. For example, the phenylene ethynylene SMAMP (Figure 2) exhibited ~75% dye leakage from PE/PG vesicles versus only 10 - 15% leakage against PC/PS and PC/PG vesicles, despite the presence of the same negatively charged lipid mol%.[65] Very similar results were obtained with SMAMPS in the arylamide series where leakage activity was again dependent on the volume fraction of negative intrinsic curvature PE. This dependence on negative intrinsic curvature lipids is consistent with the observed biological activity of this SMAMP as bacteria contain much higher volume fractions of negative intrinsic curvature lipid than mammalian cells. Synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) studied further confirmed these findings and showed how this SMAMP interacts with membranes of four different lipid compositions.[66] This SMAMP induced an inverted hexagonal phase (HII) in PE/PG vesicles, but only when the PE content was above a minimum threshold concentration of 64%. It was concluded that the ability of the SMAMP to restructure membranes critically depends on the concentration of negative intrinsic curvature PE present in the membrane. These results strongly support the hypothesis that exact lipid type may be essential for the SMAMPs ability to distinguish microorganisms from mammalian cells.
Antimicrobial activities of lead oligomers
Structure activity relationships in the arylamide series identified lead compounds that were optimized for Gram-positive activity. Table 1 illustrates results from a susceptibility screen with two of these lead compounds, PMX30016 and PMX10129, against Gram-positive and Gram-negative human clinical isolates. Both compounds exhibited broad coverage against the Gram-positive pathogens with S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphyloccal species showing the lowest MICs (0.5 ug/ml). S. pneumoniae and S. viridians were the least susceptible with MICs of 8 and 8 to 16 ug/ml, respectively. For the Gram-negative pathogens, PMX30016 had more extensive coverage than PMX10129 but overall coverage was less than for the Gram-positive organisms.
Table 1
Table 1
Clinical isolate screen vs. Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. The in vitro susceptibility assays were performed in accordance with defined CLSI guidelines for the specific organisms tested. PMX30016 and PMX10129 are members of the arylamide series. (more ...)
These SMAMPs are very stable in plasma and MICs are not affected by the addition of pooled human plasma at 40 to 60% concentrations. Full antimicrobial activity is retained under physiological salt concentrations. The arylamides are bactericidal and reductions in viable bacteria of greater than 3 logs (2× to 4× MIC concentrations) occur in 30 minutes to 6 hours upon exposure, depending on the compound and organism. The time-kill kinetics for the oligomers are concentration-dependent and appear to be somewhat slower than those for many of the AMPs which are reported to be ≤ 30 minutes. The reasons for this are unclear but may be related to the smaller size of the SMAMPs (MWs = 520 to 960 D) since polymeric mimetics with MWs > 2,000 D show time-kill kinetics of less than 30 minutes, despite having higher MICs (6 to 25 ug/ml).
Cytotoxicity of PMX30016, PMX10129 and PMX30006, a progenitor of PMX30016, were evaluated using mammalian cell lines (Table 2). Although antimicrobial activities between the three SMAMPs are similar, PMX30016 and PMX10129 are significantly less cytotoxic versus mammalian cells and have superior selectivity indices (ratios of EC50 values for cytotoxicity to MIC for MRSA). Factors that have been associated with enhanced selectivity for bacterial cells over mammalian cells are the number of positive charges, identity of the positively charged endgroup, rigidity across the backbone, hydrophobicity and stiffness of the sidechains.
Table 2
Table 2
Selectivity Indices between MRSA and mammalian cells. Cytotoxicity was evaluated in a colorimetric assay using a transformed human liver cell line (HepG2 cells) and an embryonic mouse cell line (NIH/3T3 cells). This assay measures the bioreduction of (more ...)
To investigate the potential for bacteria to develop resistance against the antimicrobial oligomers, serial passage experiments in the presence of sub-lethal SMAMP concentrations were performed with S. aureus, MRSA and P. aeruginosa. Figure 3 shows results for SMAMPs PMX10066, PMX10072 and PMX70004 up to 17 passages with S. aureus ATCC 29213. MIC values were determined at each passage and the culture at 0.5× the MIC was selected for further passage. As a control, parallel cultures were also exposed to 0.5× MIC concentrations of ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin, two broad spectrum fluoroquinolones for which resistance has been reported in this experimental format.[67] There is no change in the MICs for PMX70004, PMX10072 or PMX10066 over the entire 17 passage time course. Conversely, an increase in the MIC is readily observed by passage seven for both ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin. These data are very similar to results from resistance studies with the AMPs and together demonstrate the difficulty bacteria have in building resistance to this mechanism of cell killing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The development of bacterial resistance with three different classes of SMAMPs and two fluoroquinolones against S. aureus ATCC 29213. Serial passage and MICs were performed in microtiter panels containing antimicrobials, each over a range of doubling (more ...)
Animal efficacy studies
PMX30016 and PMX10129 have been evaluated for in vivo efficacy versus S. aureus in a mouse thigh burden model.[68] Robust efficacy is observed with both PMX30016 and PMX10129. Efficacies for PMX30016 exceed 5 log10 and 4 log10 reductions in viable bacterial cell counts (colony forming units, cfu) with total doses of 10 mg/kg (5 mg/kg/dose) and 4 mg/kg (2 mg/kg/dose), respectively (see Figure 4). PMX10129 is slightly less efficacious in this dosing format. Comparable efficacy was achieved with PMX30016 against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA ATCC33591) in the mouse thigh burden model done under similar conditions (not shown). The activity of the lead SMAMPs in the mouse thigh burden when administered by iv injection distinguishes their efficacies from many of the AMPs that lack efficacy when administered parentally in different compartments from the infection. [32,53,69] This robust efficacy, likely due to their smaller size and abiotic structures which enhance bioavailability and stability in vivo, illustrates the power of this SMAMP approach.
Figure 4
Figure 4
In vivo efficacy in the mouse thigh burden model. Neutropenic mice were inoculated in their thigh muscles with S. aureus ATCC 13709 and at one and seven hours after infection the mice were administered compound by iv injection (n = 4/group). At 25 hours (more ...)
Animal safety studies
Single dose toxicity studies were conducted to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) where no adverse signs are evident over a 4 to 7 day period following SMAMP administration (Table 3). Compounds were administered by either IV bolus injection in the tail vein of mice and rats or by IV infusion via femoral vein catheter in rats. For PMX10129, the MTD in rats is 10 mg/kg by IV bolus injection, 20 to 30 mg/kg by 1 hour IV infusion and 45 mg/kg by 4 hour IV infusion. For PMX30016, the MTD is 15 mg/kg by IV bolus injection and 20 to 30 mg/kg by 1 hour IV infusion. The sequentially higher MTDs observed for these SMAMPs when administered by IV bolus or IV infusions indicate that the MTD-related adverse events are primarily dependent on maximum concentrations attained in the blood (Cmax) rather than the total dose of drug (AUC).
Table 3
Table 3
Maximum Tolerated Doses in mice and rats. Mice or rats where administered a single dose of compound and clinical signs were recorded over a 4 to 7 day period following compound administration. Gross necropsy was also performed at the conclusion of the (more ...)
A number of peptidomimetic approaches have identified potent and selective compounds that demonstrate broad antimicrobial activities in vitro and low cytotoxic activities against mammalian cells and erythrocytes. However, robust in vivo antimicrobial activity has been a greater challenge due likely, at least in part, to poor bioavailability and systemic toxicity. This has limited their therapeutic uses to indications where they can be administered locally. PacGen Pharmaceuticals is currently in Phase II testing with a histatin peptidomimetic for oral candidiasis using a mouthrinse formulation. Ceragenix is developing the ceraganins to reduce nasal colonization of S. aureus and lower bacterial contamination of catheter surfaces. Improved bioavailability for two peptidiomimetics has been reported. Optimized acyl-lysine oligomers show good blood levels and efficacy in a mouse peritonitis model when administered intraperitoneally[54] and cyclic D,L-peptides are active in mouse peritonitis and thigh burden infection models when administered intravenously, although improved therapeutic indices appear necessary for further development.[22]
Using de novo design principles, it has been possible to develop SMAMPs with potent in vivo activity via iv administration. The synthetic flexibility of the small oligomeric scaffolds allowed rapid structure optimization and elimination of unwanted side reactions. In a short time, leads were taken from the design laboratory to the clinic. At this early stage, it may be too soon to predict the opportunities of these principles but the success to date would suggest many important opportunities lie ahead for the design of synthetic oligomers with protein-like activity.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank financial support from the NIH (AI74866). In addition, a host of colleagues have made significant contributions to this work and their names can be found on the primary references. We are grateful for their commitment to this endeavor.
Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1. Brogden KA. Antimicrobial Peptides: Pore Formers or Metabolic Inhibitors in Bacteria? Nature. 2005;3:238–250. [PubMed]
2. Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002;415:389–395. [PubMed]
3. Shai Y. From innate immunity to de-novo designed antimicrobial peptides. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2002;8:715–725. [PubMed]
4. Hancock RE, Lehrer R. Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16:82–88. [PubMed]
5. Matsuzaki K, Sugishita K, Miyajima K. Interactions of an antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2, with lipopolysaccharide-containing liposomes as a model for outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria. Febs Letters. 1999;449:221–224. [PubMed]
6. Oren Z, Shai Y. Mode of action of linear amphipathic alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers. 1998;47:451–463. [PubMed]
7. Sitaram N, Nagaraj R. Host-defense antimicrobial peptides: Importance of structure for activity. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2002;8:727–742. [PubMed]
8. Papo N, Shahar M, Eisenbach L, Shai Y. A novel lytic peptide composed of DL-Amino acids selectively kills cancer cells in culture and in mice. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:21018–21023. [PubMed]
9. Papo N, Shai Y. New lytic peptides based on the D,L-amphipathic helix motif preferentially kill tumor cells compared to normal cells. Biochemistry. 2003;42:9346–9354. [PubMed]
10. Finlay BB, Hancock REW. Can Innate Immunity be Enhanced to Treat Microbial Infections? Nature Reviews: Microbiology. 2004;2:497–504. [PubMed]
11. Hancock:review in this edition.
12. Lehrer RI, Ganz T, Szklarek D, Daher K, Barton A, Selsted ME. Mechanisms of Microbicidal Activity by Defensins. Clinical Research. 1987;35:A616–A616.
13. Silvestro L, Gupta K, Weiser JN, Axelsen PH. The concentration-dependent membrane activity of cecropin A. Biochemistry. 1997;36:11452–11460. [PubMed]
14. Lehrer RI, Lichtenstein AK, Ganz T. Defensins - Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Peptides of Mammalian-Cells. Annual Review of Immunology. 1993;11:105–128. [PubMed]
15. Bishop JL, Finlay BB. Friend or Foe? Antimicrobial Peptides Trigger Pathogen Virulence. TRENDS in Molecular Medicine. 2006;12:3–6. [PubMed]
16. Hancock REW, Diamond G. The Role of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides in Innate Host Defences. Trends in Microbiol. 2000;8:402–410. [PubMed]
17. Perron GG, Zasloff M, Bell G. Experimental evolution of resistance to an antimicrobial peptide. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2006;273:251–256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Buckling A, Brockhurst M. RAMP Resistance. Nature. 2005;438:170–171. [PubMed]
19. Hodges RS, Chen Y, Kopecky E, Mant CT. Monitoring the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of amino acid side-chains in the non-polar and polar faces of amphipathic alpha-helices by reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction/cation-exchange chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 2004;1053:161–172. [PubMed]
20. Park Y, Lee DG, Jang SH, Woo ER, Jeong HG, Choi CH, Hahm KS. A Leu- Lys-rich antimicrobial peptide: activity and mechanism. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Proteins and Proteomics. 2003;1645:172–182. [PubMed]
21. Prenner EJ, Kiricsi M, Jelokhani-Niaraki M, Lewis R, Hodges RS, McElhaney RN. Structure-activity relationships of diastereomeric lysine ring size analogs of the antimicrobial peptide gramicidin S - Mechanism of action and discrimination between bacterial and animal cell membranes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280:2002–2011. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Dartois V, Sanchez-Quesada J, Cabezas E, Chi E, Dubbelde C, Dunn C, Granja J, Gritzen C, Weinberger D, Ghadiri MR, et al. Systemic antibacterial activity of novel synthetic cyclic peptides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2005;49:3302–3310. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Lai R, Zheng YT, Shen JH, Liu GJ, Liu H, Lee WH, Tang SZ, Zhang Y. Antimicrobial peptides from skin secretions of Chinese red belly toad Bombina maxima. Peptides. 2002;23:427–435. [PubMed]
24. Srinivas N, Moehle K, Abou-Hadeed K, Obrecht D, Robinson JA. Biaryl amino acid templates in place of D-Pro-L-Pro in cyclic beta-hairpin cationic antimicrobial peptidiomimetics. Org Biomol Chem. 2007;5:3100–3105. [PubMed]
25. Giuliani A, Pirri G, Bozzi A, DiGiulio A, Aschi M, Rinaldi AC. Antimicrobial peptides: natural templates for synthetic membrane-active compounds. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:2450–2460. [PubMed]
26. Violette A, Fournel S, Lamour K, Chaloin O, Frisch B, Briand JP, Monteil H, Guichard G. Mimicking helical antibacterial peptides with nonpeptidic folding oligomers. Chem Biol. 2006;13:531–538. [PubMed]
27. Hamuro Y, Schneider JP, DeGrado WF. De novo design of antibacterial beta-peptides. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1999;121:12200–12201.
28. Porter EA, Wang XF, Lee HS, Weisblum B, Gellman SH. Antibiotics - Non-haemolytic beta-amino-acid oligomers. Nature. 2000;404:565–565. [PubMed]
29. Schmitt MA, Weisblum B, Gellman SH. Interplay among folding, sequence, and lipophilicity in the antibacterial and hemolytic activities of alpha/beta-peptides. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:417–428. [PubMed]
30. Raguse TL, Porter EA, Weisblum B, Gellman SH. Structure-activity studies of 14-helical antimicrobial beta-peptides: Probing the relationship between conformational stability and antimicrobial potency. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:12774–12785. [PubMed]
31. Porter EA, Weisblum B, Gellman SH. Mimicry of host-defense peptides by unnatural oligomers: Antimicrobial beta-peptides. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:7324–7330. [PubMed]
32. Braunstein A, Papo N, Shai Y. In vitro activity and potency of an intravenously injected antimicrobial peptide and its DL amino acid analog in mice infected with bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48:3127–3129. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Patch JA, Barron AE. Helical peptoid mimics of magainin-2 amide. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:12092–12093. [PubMed]
34. Makovitzki A, Avrahami D, Shai Y. Ultrashort antibacterial and antifungal lipopeptides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:15997–16002. [PubMed]
35. Shai Y, Makovitzky A, Avrahami D. Host defense peptides and lipopeptides: Modes of action and potential candidates for the treatment of bacterial and fungal infections. Current Protein & Peptide Science. 2006;7:479–486. [PubMed]
36. Makovitzki A, Baram J, Shai Y. Antimicrobial lipopolypeptides composed of palmitoyl di- and tricationic peptides: In vitro and in vivo activities, self-assembly to nanostructures, and a plausible mode of action. Biochemistry. 2008;47:10630–10636. [PubMed]
37. Vallon-Eberhard A, Makovitzki A, Beauvais A, Latge JP, Jung S, Shai Y. Efficient clearance of Aspergillus fumigatus in murine lungs by an ultrashort antimicrobial lipopeptide, Palmitoyl-Lys-Ala-DAla-Lys. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2008;52:3118–3126. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Savage PB, Li CH, Taotafa U, Ding BW, Guan QY. Antibacterial properties of cationic steroid antibiotics. FEMS Microbio Lett. 2002;217:1–7. [PubMed]
39. Mason AJ, Marquette A, Bechinger B. Zwitterionic phospholipids and sterols modulate antimicrobial peptide-induced membrane destabilization. Biophysical Journal. 2007;93:4289–4299. [PubMed]
40. Van Bambeke F, Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Struelens MJ, Tulkens PM. The bacterial envelope as a target for novel anti-MRSA antibiotics. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2008;29:124–134. [PubMed]
41. Arnt L, Nusslein K, Tew GN. Nonhemolytic Abiogenic Polymers as Antimicrobial Peptide Mimics. Journal of Polymer Chemistry Part A- Polymer Chemistry. 2004;42:3860–3864.
42. Arnt L, Tew GN. New poly(phenyleneethynylene)s with cationic, facially amphiphilic structures. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:7664–7665. [PubMed]
43. Arnt L, Tew GN. Cationic facially amphiphilic poly(phenylene ethynylene)s studied at the air-water interface. Langmuir. 2003;19:2404–2408.
44. Kuroda K, DeGrado WF. Amphiphilic polymethacrylate derivatives as antimicrobial agents. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:4128–4129. [PubMed]
45. Sambhy V, Peterson BR, Sen A. Antibacterial and hemolytic activities of pyridinium polymers as a function of the spatial relationship between the positive charge and the pendant alkyl tail. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:1250–1254. [PubMed]
46. Mowery BP, Lee SE, Kissounko DA, Epand RF, Epand RM, Weisblum B, Stahl SS, Gellman SH. Mimicry of antimicrobial host-defense peptides by random copolymers. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:15474–+. [PubMed]
47. Ilker MF, Nusslein K, Tew GN, Coughlin EB. Tuning the hemolytic and antibacterial activities of amphiphilic polynorbornene derivatives. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:15870–15875. [PubMed]
48. Lienkamp K, Madkour AE, Musante A, Nelson CF, Nusslein K, Tew GN. Antimicrobial polymers prepared by ROMP with unprecedented selectivity: A molecular construction kit approach. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130:9836–9843. [PubMed]
49. Gabriel GJ, Madkour AE, Dabkowski JM, Nelson CF, Nüsslein K, Tew GN. Synthetic Mimic of Antimicrobial Peptide with Non-Membrane-Disrupting Antibacterial Properties. Biomacromolecules. 2008 in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Gabriel GJ, Maegerlein JA, Nelson CF, Dabkowski JM, Eren T, Nüsslein K, Tew GN. Comparison of Facially Amphiphilic versus Segregated Monomers in the Design of Antibacterial Copolymers. Chem E J. 2008 in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Gabriel GJ, Som A, Madkour AE, Eren T, Tew GN. Infectious Disease: Connecting Innate Immunity to Biocidal Polymers. Materials Science and Engineering R. 2007;57:28–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Madkour AE, Tew GN. Perspective - Towards self-sterilizing medical devices: controlling infection. Polymer International. 2008;57:6–10.
53. Navon-Venezia S, Feder R, Gaidukov L, Carmeli Y, Mor A. Antibacterial properties of dermaseptin S4 derivatives with in vivo activity. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2002;46:689–694. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Radzishevskyl IS, Rotem S, Bourdetsky D, Navon-Venezia S, Carmeli Y, Mor A. Improved antimicrobial peptides based on acyl-lysine oligomers. Nature Biotechnol. 2007;25:657–659. [PubMed]
55. Tew GN, Liu DH, Chen B, Doerksen RJ, Kaplan J, Carroll PJ, Klein ML, DeGrado WF. De novo design of biomimetic antimicrobial polymers. Proc Nat'l Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5110–5114. [PubMed]
56. Som A, Vemparala S, Ivanov I, Tew GN. Synthetic Mimics of Antimicrobial Peptides. Biopolymers. 2008;90:83–93. [PubMed]
57. Tang H, Doerksen RJ, Jones TV, Klein ML, Tew GN. Biomimetic Facially Amphiphilic Antibacterial Oligomers with Conformationally Stiff Backbones. Chem Bio. 2006;13:427–435. [PubMed]
58. Tang HZ, Doerksen RJ, Tew GN. Synthesis of urea oligomers and their antibacterial activity. Chemical Communications. 2005:1537–1539. [PubMed]
59. Liu DH, Choi S, Chen B, Doerksen RJ, Clements DJ, Winkler JD, Klein ML, DeGrado WF. Nontoxic membrane-active antimicrobial arylamide oligomers. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:1158–1162. [PubMed]
60. Doerksen RJ, Chen B, Liu DH, Tew GN, DeGrado WF, Klein ML. Controlling the conformation of arylamides: Computational studies of intramolecular hydrogen bonds between amides and ethers or thioethers. Chemistry-a European Journal. 2004;10:5008–5016. [PubMed]
61. Ishitsuka Y, Arnt L, Majewski J, Frey S, Ratajczek M, Kjaer K, Tew GN, Lee KYC. Amphiphilic poly(phenyleneethynylene)s can mimic antimicrobial peptide membrane disordering effect by membrane insertion. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2006;128:13123–13129. [PubMed]
62. Tew GN, Clements D, Tang HZ, Arnt L, Scott RW. Antimicrobial activity of an abiotic host defense peptide mimic. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes. 2006;1758:1387–1392. [PubMed]
63. Yang L, Gordon VD, Mishra A, Som A, Purdy KR, Davis MA, Tew GN, Wong GCL. Synthetic Antimicrobial Oligomers Induce a Composition-Dependent Topological Transition in Membranes. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12141–12147. [PubMed]
64. Gabriel GJ, Som A, Madkour AE, Eren T, Tew GN. Infectious disease: Connecting innate immunity to biocidal polymers. Materials Science & Engineering R. 2007;57:28–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Som A, Tew GN. Influence of Lipid Composition on Membrane Activty of Antimicrobial Phenylene Ethynylene Oligomers. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:3495–3502. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Yang L, Gordon VD, Mishra A, Som A, Purdy KR, Davis MA, Tew GN, Wong GCL. Synthetic Antimicrobial Oligomers Induce a Composition-Dependent Topological Transition in Membranes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:12141–12147. [PubMed]
67. Entenza JM, Vouillamoz J, Glauser MP, Moreillon P. Levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, or vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1997;41:1662–1667. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Choi SW, DeGrado WF. Design of potent nontoxic nonpeptide-based antimicrobial agents. Proc Nat'l Acad Sci USA. 2008 submitted.
69. Cirioni O, Giacometti A, Ghiselli R, Mocchegiani F, Fineo A, Orlando F, Del Prete MS, Rocchi M, Saba V, Scalise G. Single-dose intraperitoneal magainins improve survival in a gram-negative-pathogen septic shock rat model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2002;46:101–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]