PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Curr Opin Chem Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr 1, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
Curr Opin Chem Biol. Oct 2008; 12(5): 505–514.
doi:  10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.08.008
PMCID: PMC2642911
NIHMSID: NIHMS77800

Super-resolution imaging by nanoscale localization of photo-switchable fluorescent probes

Summary

A new form of super-resolution fluorescence microscopy has emerged in recent years, based on the high-accuracy localization of individual photo-switchable fluorescent labels. Image resolution as high as 20 nm in the lateral dimensions and 50 nm in the axial direction has been attained with this concept, representing an order of magnitude improvement over the diffraction limit. The demonstration of multicolor imaging with molecular specificity, three-dimensional imaging of thick samples, and time-resolved imaging of living cells further illustrates the exciting potential of this method for biological imaging at the nanoscopic scale.

Introduction

Fluorescence microscopy has become one of the most widely used tools in modern biomedical research. Inherently non-invasive, fluorescence imaging enables the observation of specific components or processes in living cells, tissues, and whole organisms. Fluorescent probes are available with a range of colors that span the visible spectrum, and a variety of labeling techniques such as immunofluorescence and in-situ hybridization allow fluorophores to be specifically coupled to molecules of interest, enabling the simultaneous visualization of multiple targets by multicolor imaging. Furthermore, the revolutionizing development of fluorescent proteins and other genetically encoded fluorescent labels has allowed specific proteins in living cells to be observed in real time [1].

The limited resolution of fluorescence microscopy, however, leaves many biological structures too small to be observed in detail. Sub-cellular structures span a range of length scales from micrometers to nanometers, while the light microscope is classically limited to a resolution of ~ 200 nm in the lateral direction and ~ 500 nm in the axial direction. Other imaging techniques such as electron microscopy (EM) have achieved much higher spatial resolutions [2], and the ability of these methods to visualize biological samples with molecular resolution has had a tremendous impact on our understanding of biology. The use of electron-dense tags for molecule-specific labeling in EM, however, has limitations in terms of the low labeling efficiency and the small number of species that can be simultaneously observed, making it difficult to map out molecular interactions in cells. Moreover, the sample preparation methods used for EM currently preclude the imaging of live samples. To achieve image resolutions comparable to EM but with the labeling specificity and live-cell compatibility provided by fluorescence microscopy would open a new window for the study of the nanoscale structure and dynamics of cells and tissues. With this goal in mind the classical limit of optical resolution has been tested, giving way in recent years to a number of new ideas which we collectively refer to as “super-resolution” imaging techniques. In this review we focus primarily on a newly developed concept for super-resolution imaging which is based on the nanoscale localization of photo-switchable fluorescent probes.

The diffraction limit of resolution

It was recognized by Abbe in the 19th century that the spatial resolution of optical microscopy is limited by the diffraction of light [3]. It is due to diffraction that a point source of light, when imaged through a microscope, appears as a spot with a finite size. The intensity profile of this spot defines the point spread function (PSF) of the microscope. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the PSF in the lateral (x - y) and axial (z) directions is given approximately by Δx, Δyλ/(2NA) and Δz ≈ 2λη/(NA)2, respectively, where λ is the wavelength of the emitted light, η is the index of refraction of the medium, and NA is the numerical aperture of the objective lens [4]. Two identical fluorophores separated by a distance less than the PSF width will generate substantially overlapped images, rendering them difficult or impossible to resolve. The resolution of the microscope is thus limited by the width of the PSF. For visible light (λ ≈ 500 nm) and a high numerical aperture objective (NA = 1.4), the resolution limit is ~ 200 nm laterally and > 500 nm along the optic axis.

A number of fluorescence imaging techniques have pushed the boundaries of optical resolution. Among these, confocal and multi-photon fluorescence microscopy improve the resolution while simultaneously attenuating out-of-focus light to allow optical sectioning and 3D imaging [4,5]. Methods employing two objective lenses, such as 4Pi and I5M microscopy, effectively increase the numerical aperture of the microscope and substantially improve the axial resolution [4,6,7]. Digital deconvolution algorithms have also been developed to produce a sharpened image with resolution improvement [8]. Each of these methods achieves an increase in the lateral and/or axial resolution, extending the resolution of the microscope to the 100 - 200 nm range.

Optical resolution beyond the diffraction limit

The first demonstration of optical image resolution substantially below the diffraction limit was by near-field scanning optical microscopy [9-11], though the requirement of a near-field scanning probe has limited the application of this technique to imaging near the sample surface. The idea of far-field light microscopy with diffraction-unlimited resolution is a relatively recent one. Hell and co-workers introduced Stimulated-Emission-Depletion (STED) fluorescence microscopy and related concepts for sub-diffraction-limit imaging in the mid-1990s [12]. STED microscopy takes advantage of the non-linear depletion of fluorophores from the excited state by stimulated-emission. In addition to a focused excitation laser beam which pumps the fluorophores to their excited state, a second red-shifted STED beam, typically with a donut-shaped intensity profile, is used to trigger stimulated emission of the excited fluorophores in a region surrounding the excitation spot, forcing them to the ground state. This effectively confines fluorescence emission to a small region at the center of the donut, thereby reducing the size of the PSF and increasing the resolution. Experimental realizations of the STED microscope have achieved image resolutions previously thought to be unattainable. Different implementations of STED have demonstrated resolutions as high as ~ 20 nm in the lateral directions, 30 - 40 nm in the axial direction, and 40 - 45 nm in all three dimensions simultaneously when lateral and axial STED beams are combined in a 4Pi geometry for three-dimensional (3D) super-resolution imaging [13,14]. Variations of STED have also been introduced, using other Reversibly Saturable Optical Fluorescent Transitions (RESOLFT) to achieve sub-diffraction-limit resolution [15]. Recently, in an experimental tour de force, the first example of video-rate sub-diffraction-limit imaging was demonstrated using STED to study synaptic vesicles in live neuronal cells with 60 nm resolution [16].

Another approach to effectively sharpen the PSF is by Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM) [17,18]. When a sample is illuminated by widefield periodically patterned light, the excitation pattern mixes with the spatial information in the sample and shifts high frequency structural information to within the detection range of the microscope. SIM effectively expands the frequency space detectable by the microscope, thereby reducing the PSF size. This method increases the resolution by up to a factor of two, as the periodicity of the excitation pattern is itself limited by diffraction. In combination with a dual objective lens imaging geometry (I5M), a three-dimensional image resolution of ~ 100 nm has been demonstrated with this technique [19]. When structured illumination is used at saturating intensities, excitation patterns with arbitrarily high spatial frequencies may be generated, extending the resolution of SIM significantly beyond the diffraction limit [20,21]. The experimental realization of Saturated Structured Illumination Microscopy (SSIM) attained ~ 50 nm in-plane resolution [21].

In the past several years a new concept for super-resolution imaging based on the localization of individual fluorescent molecules has emerged [22-24]. Rather than modify the excitation light pattern to yield a smaller PSF, as in STED and SSIM, super-resolution imaging may be achieved by precisely determining the positions of the fluorophores labeling the sample. The use of photo-switchable fluorescent probes allows the overlapping images of many individual fluorophores to be separated in time and enables precise fluorophore localization on densely labeled samples. The positions of the fluorphores are then plotted to construct a high-resolution image. In the remainder of this review we focus on the recent development of techniques based on this concept. The reader is referred to another recent review article for a more detailed description of other sub-diffraction-limit imaging methods [15].

Super-resolution imaging by single molecule localization

The position of a single isolated fluorescent emitter, although its image appears as a diffraction-limited spot, can be precisely determined by finding the centroid of its image. The precision of this localization process is given approximately by equation M1, where s is the standard deviation of the PSF and N is the number of photons detected [25]. This concept has been used to track small particles with nanometer-scale accuracy [26,27]. Recently it has been shown that, even when the emitter is a single fluorescent dye, its position can be determined with an accuracy as high as ~1 nm [28]. Nanoscale precision in single molecule localization does not, however, translate directly into image resolution. When multiple fluorophores are positioned close together such that they are separated by a distance less than the PSF width, their images overlap and this prevents accurate localization of each of the fluorophores. In order to distinguish the fluorescence signal from nearby fluorescent emitters, several approaches have been used, based on differences in emission wavelength [29-31], the sequential photobleaching of each fluorophore [32,33], or stochastic blinking [34]. These methods have obtained high accuracy localization for several closely spaced emitters, but are difficult to extend to densities higher than 2 - 5 fluorophores per diffraction-limited area. A fluorescently labeled biological sample, by contrast, may be labeled with hundreds or thousands of fluorophores per diffraction-limited region.

Super-resolution imaging based on fluorophore localization takes advantage of the properties of photo-switchable fluorescent molecules, which can be switched between a non-fluorescent (dark) state and a fluorescent (bright) state by exposure to light of particular wavelengths. The imaging process consists of many cycles during which fluorophores are activated, imaged, and deactivated (Figure 1). During each cycle, the density of activated molecules is kept low by using a weak activation light intensity, such that the images of individual fluorophores do not typically overlap and therefore can be localized with high precision. This process is repeated until a sufficient number of localizations have been recorded, and a high resolution image is constructed from the measured positions of the fluorophores. The resolution of the final image is not limited by diffraction, but by the precision of each localization. This concept, independently developed by three research groups, has been given the names Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM) [22], Photoactivated Localization Microscopy (PALM) [23], or Fluorescence Photo-activation Localization Microscopy (FPALM) [24].

Figure 1
Super-resolution imaging by high-precision localization of photo-switchable fluorophores. (A - D) The imaging concept. (A) Schematic of a cell in which the structure of interest (grey filaments in this case) are labeled with photo-switchable fluorophores ...

The initial results obtained with this method yielded images with extraordinary spatial resolution and employed a number of different fluorescent probes. Using a reversibly switchable synthetic dye pair, Cy3 - Cy5 [35], Rust et al. achieved an experimental localization precision of 8 nm (standard deviation) for each switchable probe, corresponding to an image resolution of ~ 18 nm in terms of the limit of resolvability for two adjacent probes (the FWHM of the localization probability distribution) [22]. DNA and DNA-protein complexes were imaged in vitro using these probes and fluorophores separated by ~ 40 nanometers were clearly resolved. Betzig et al. demonstrated imaging of fixed cell samples expressing target proteins fused with the photo-switchable fluorescent proteins Kaede [36] and EosFP [37]. A variety of targets were labeled and the super-resolution images revealed cellular structures with sizes well below the diffraction limit [23]. Hess et al. imaged photo-activatable Green Fluorescent Protein (PA-GFP) [38] on a surface, achieving a spatial resolution of several tens of nanometers [24]. Collectively, these results demonstrated a resolution improvement of an order of magnitude over conventional imaging, while requiring no specialized setup other than a standard fluorescence microscope, low power continuous wave (CW) lasers, and a sensitive CCD camera.

A number of photo-switchable proteins and organic dyes have been applied to these techniques (summarized in Table 1), and variations in the image acquisition process have been demonstrated. In addition to those mentioned above, other photo-switchable fluorescent proteins have been used for super-resolution imaging including KikGR [39], Dronpa [40] and its mutants Dronpa-2, Dronpa-3, and rsFastLime [41][42], photo-switchable CFP2 [43], and other photo-switchable organic dyes including caged rhodamine [23], caged fluorescein [44], and a newly developed photochromic rhodamine compound [45]. Increased imaging speeds were demonstrated by using asynchronous activation and matching the camera frame rate with the switching kinetics of the fluorophore (this approach has been termed PALM with independently running acquisition, or PALMIRA) [46], and also by stroboscopic illumination [47]. In certain cases, the dynamic binding or translational motions of fluorescent molecules have also been used to produce high-resolution images of cellular structures without requiring the use of photo-switchable probes [48,49].

Table 1
Spectral properties of photo-switchable organic dyes and fluorescent proteins, including the fluorescence excitation and emission wavelengths of the pre- and post-activation states, and the wavelength used for activation of the fluorophore

Multicolor imaging

One of the major advantages of fluorescence microscopy is its capacity for multicolor imaging, allowing the relative organization and interactions between different biological structures or molecules to be visualized, for example through the colocalization of differently colored probes [1]. This aspect of fluorescence imaging is essential for probing interactions between biomolecules and could provide invaluable insights into biological processes if realized in super-resolution. Multicolor imaging requires multiple, optically distinguishable probes, however. By generalizing their cyanine dye-pair approach, Bates et al. have created a palette of photo-switchable probes, each consisting of a coupled dye pair: a “reporter” dye that can be imaged and deactivated by red light, and an “activator” dye that serves to activate the reporter by absorbing a specific wavelength of light corresponding to its absorption spectrum [50]. For example, as many as nine distinguishable probes can be formed by a combinatorial pairing of three reporter dyes with different emission wavelengths (e.g. Cy5, Cy5.5, and Cy7) and three activator dyes with different absorption spectra (e.g. Alexa Fluor 405, Cy2, and Cy3). With these probes, three-color imaging of DNA molecules immobilized on a surface and two-color imaging of immuno-labeled microtubules and clathrin-coated pits in a fixed cell were demonstrated (Figure 2), achieving a lateral resolution of ~ 25 nm using two or three different activators each paired with the same reporter [50]. An advantage of multicolor imaging using a single reporter dye is that the different color channels are naturally aligned because the localizations are derived from the same type of fluorophores imaged along the same optical path.

Figure 2
Multi-color STORM imaging. (A, B) A comparison of two-color conventional immunofluoresence (A) and STORM (B) images of microtubules (green) and clathrin-coated pits (red) in fixed BSC1 cells. The antibodies used for microtubule staining were labeled with ...

Multicolor super-resolution imaging has also been achieved using a photo-switchable fluorescent protein (rsFastLime) and a photo-switchable organic dye (Cy5) as labels. By sequentially imaging these two fluorophores at different excitation and emission wavelengths, Bock et al. have demonstrated two-color imaging of microtubules in cells [51]. Multicolor imaging using fluorescent proteins alone is more difficult, because the emission spectrum of the pre-activated state of one fluorescent protein often overlaps with that of the post-activated state of another (Table 1). Shroff et al. have circumvented this problem by using a reversibly switchable green fluorescent protein (Dronpa) and an irreversibly switchable green - orange fluorescent protein (EosFP) for two-color imaging of actin and adhesion complexes in fixed cells [52]. The two fluorophores are imaged sequentially, with EosFP being imaged first followed by Dronpa which is imaged after all of the EosFP have been photobleached. The necessity for sequential imaging of each color, however, would present an obstacle for time-resolved multicolor imaging which requires the interactions between structures labeled with different colors to be monitored over multiple time points. This illustrates the continued need for the development of new photo-switchable fluorescent proteins that allow simultaneous multi-color imaging.

Three dimensional imaging

Among the most useful aspects of fluorescence microscopy is its ability to provide a 3D image of the sample. To extend this capability to super-resolution imaging by fluorophore localization, a means to determine the lateral as well as the axial positions of the activated fluorophores is required. Such a method has been demonstrated by Huang et al., in which the axial position of the fluorophore is determined based on astigmatism in the image, as illustrated in Figure 3A [53]. Specifically, a cylindrical lens is inserted into the imaging path so that the shape (the ellipticity) of the image of each fluorophore becomes a highly sensitive measure of its distance from the focal plane [54], while the centroid of the image provides the lateral position as before. This method achieves a simultaneous lateral resolution of ~ 25 nm and an axial resolution of ~ 50 nm over a range of 600 nm in the z direction without scanning the sample. This technique has been used to visualize the 3D organization of microtubules in a cell (Figures 3B-E) and to resolve the structure of clathrin-coated pits, which have a diameter of ~ 150 nm. In combination with optical or physical z-sectioning, thicker samples of several micrometers in depth could be imaged in this manner.

Figure 3
Three-dimensional STORM imaging. (A) Simplified optical diagram illustrating the principle of determining the z coordinate of a fluorescent object from the ellipticity of its image by introducing a cylindrical lens into the imaging path. The right panel ...

Another approach for 3D imaging was recently reported by Jurette et al. which takes advantage of multi-focal-plane imaging [55] to achieve sub-diffraction-limit axial resolution [44]. By simultaneously imaging two focal planes in the sample, the images of activated fluorophores can be fit with a 3D PSF to determine their spatial coordinates. This technique is capable of imaging 800 nm in the z direction without scanning, and several micrometers with the aid of z-scanning. A benefit of this approach is that the lateral resolution of the image is independent of axial position. A resolution of 75 nm in z was demonstrated for 3D imaging of fluorophore-coated beads 4 micrometers in diameter.

Several other techniques could prove useful for 3D super-resolution imaging. For example, defocused imaging methods used for 3D particle tracking may also be suitable for the 3D localization of activated fluorophores [56]. Conventional optical sectioning methods such as confocal or two-photon microscopy, which allow for only a thin (500 - 800 nm) layer of fluorophores in the sample to be observed or activated [45], may also be used to improve 3D imaging of thick samples by minimizing the fluorescence signal from outside the focal plane.

Live-cell imaging

One of the fundamental advantages of fluorescence microscopy lies in the time-resolved imaging of living samples. Extending this capability to nanoscale resolutions will provide exciting new insights into many basic processes of the cell. In this respect, the recent achievement of video-rate STED imaging of a live neuron with 60 nm lateral resolution represents a major advance for the field [16].

Several advances have been made toward live cell super-resolution imaging by fluorophore localization techniques. Hess et al. have studied the microstructure of the cell membrane by tracking the movement of PA-GFP labeled hemaglutinin molecules on the membrane of a living cell with 40 nm accuracy [57]. While single-particle tracking in live cells with nanometer accuracy has been demonstrated previously [27,58,59], the use of photo-switchable fluorescent probes allows the motion of numerous protein molecules to be tracked in the same cell and high-resolution information on the underlying cellular structures to be derived from the particle tracks. Using a similar approach, Manley et al. have achieved impressively high density particle tracking of EosFP-labeled Gag and VSVG proteins in a single cell, allowing a high resolution map of the local membrane diffusion coefficient for each protein to be generated [60].

Finally, Shroff and co-workers have demonstrated live-cell super-resolution imaging of adhesion complexes using photo-switchable EosFP [61]. Movies with a resolution of ~ 60 nm were obtained at a rate of 25 - 60 seconds per image, revealing the retrograde transport and elongation of adhesion complexes and allowing different adhesion complex morphologies to be observed (Figure 4). The transport of paxillin molecules into and out of the adhesion complex was also characterized. Although the imaging speed of 25 - 60 s is substantially slower than that of video rate STED, a much larger sample area is imaged simultaneously in this work. Considering the relatively short history of the STORM / PALM / FPALM techniques, we expect that the imaging speed will improve significantly with continued development.

Figure 4
Live-cell PALM imaging (A) PALM image of a wide area of the cell, showing elongated and punctate adhesion complexes in a CHO cell expressing paxillin fused to EosFP. Scale bar 5 μm. (B) Higher magnification of the green boxed region in (A) illustrating ...

Image resolution and probe development

The resolution of an image constructed from the localization of many individual fluorescent labels is dependent on several factors, including (i) the accuracy of each localization, (ii) the density of localizations obtained in the image, and (iii) the physical size of the labels themselves. The relationship between resolution and localization accuracy is fairly straightforward. The ability to resolve two labels as separate entities is limited by the accuracy with which the position of each label can be determined. As discussed above, the localization accuracy is dependent primarily on the number of photons collected from the fluorophore during a single activation-deactivation cycle.

The relationship between image resolution and the localization density can be thought of in terms of Nyquist sampling theory: for a d-dimensional image, in order to resolve a structure having spatial features of size α, the minimum density of localizations required is ≈ (2/α)d [61]. For example, in the case of a specimen labeled with fluorescent antibodies, a sufficient density of antibodies must be present in order to fully map out the fine details of the labeled structure. By the same criterion, a sufficient number of these fluorescent labels must be localized in the STORM / PALM / FPALM imaging process.

These factors place important constraints on the selection of photo-switchable fluorophores for super-resolution imaging. Photo-switchable organic dyes and fluorescent proteins may have a finite rate of fluorescence emission in the dark state, or a finite rate of spontaneous activation from the dark state to the bright state, both of which can result in an undesired background signal during image acquisition. Since accurate fluorophore localization depends on low background fluorescence and high photon flux from the molecules of interest, the properties of a fluorophore most relevant to super-resolution imaging are the number of photons detected per activation cycle and the contrast ratio between the fluorescent and the dark state (i.e. the emission intensity ratio between the fluorescent state and the dark state, or equivalently the fraction of time the fluorophore spends in the dark state versus the fluorescent state in the absence of specific activation). Fluorophores that emit a larger number of photons before switching off allow each localization to be performed with greater accuracy. Fluorophores with a higher contrast ratio effectively allow the sample to be labeled at a higher density without generating problematic background fluorescence, allowing for a higher resolution in the final image. The best of both aspects may not be found in the same fluorophore. For example, while the Cy5 and Alexa Fluor 647 dyes are very bright, with ~ 6000 photons detected per activation cycle [50], they also have a relatively high spontaneous activation rate and hence a relatively low contrast ratio of ~ 1000. By comparison, photochromic rhodamine and EosFP are substantially dimmer (~ 900 and 400 photons detected, respectively) and yet they exhibit a much higher contrast ratio (104 - 107 and 105, respectively) [45,52]. The optimal choice of fluorophore will differ for different applications.

Provided a sufficiently large photon flux and labeling density, the image resolution achieved by fluorophore localization techniques such as STORM / PALM / FPALM can be almost arbitrarily high. For example, the 6000 photons detected in the case of Cy5 corresponds to a theoretical localization precision of only a few nanometers [25]. Such an accuracy points to the possibility of achieving true molecular-scale image resolution. At this level of resolution, the physical size of the label also becomes an important factor. Commonly used labels for fluorescence imaging of biomolecules include antibodies (~ 10 nm in size), Fab fragments of antibodies (~ 5 nm) and fluorescent proteins (~ 4 nm), all of which may significantly affect resolution at the molecular level. Alternatively, certain peptide sequences have been demonstrated which show high affinities to specific chemical groups [62,63], or which can be recognized by ligases for covalent attachment of chemical groups [64,65]. These peptides, when fused to target proteins, allow small organic dyes to be linked directly to specific molecules of interest. This type of genetically encoded small molecule labeling strategy may prove useful for pushing the limits of optical image resolution to the molecular scale.

Finally, time-resolved super-resolution imaging of live samples would benefit in particular from the further development of reversibly switchable probes. In contrast to probes which undergo a single activation cycle before permanent photobleaching, reversibly switchable fluorophores can be switched on and off many times. This property significantly benefits time resolved imaging as the same fluorophore can be localized at different time points in the imaging process, and the pool of activatable fluorophores is depleted more slowly, allowing higher time resolution and longer movies [61].

Conclusions

Recent years have witnessed rapid progress in sub-diffraction limit fluorescence imaging, facilitated by the development of fluorescent probes with novel properties such as photo-switchable fluorescence emission. In this review we have focused on a method of super-resolution imaging based on the high accuracy localization of individual fluorophores. This method has yielded fluorescence images with spatial resolution an order of magnitude finer than the classical diffraction limit of optical microscopy, and has the advantage of ease of implementation, requiring no specialized apparatus apart from a fluorescence microscope and a sensitive CCD camera. The demonstration of multicolor, three-dimensional, and live cell super-resolution imaging capabilities illustrates the great potential of this approach. Together with other sub-diffraction limit imaging techniques such as STED and SSIM, and considering the rapid pace of development in the field as a whole, we expect that super-resolution fluorescence microscopy will be broadly applied to biological research and bring about new insights into life at the nanometer scale.

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Bujny and G. Dempsey for assistance in the preparation of Figure 1 and Table 1, and for valuable comments and discussions. This work is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (to X.Z.). X.Z. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Giepmans BN, Adams SR, Ellisman MH, Tsien RY. The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function. Science. 2006;312:217–224. [PubMed]
2. Koster AJ, Klumperman J. Electron microscopy in cell biology: integrating structure and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;(Suppl):SS6–10. [PubMed]
3. Abbe E. Beitrage zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung. Arch Mikroskop Anat. 1873;9:413–420.
4. Pawley JB, editor. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. Springer; New York: 2006.
5. Helmchen F, Denk W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat Methods. 2005;2:932–940. [PubMed]
6. Hell S, Stelzer EHK. Fundamental improvement of resolution with a 4Pi-confocal fluorescence microscope using two-photon excitation. Optics Communications. 1992;93:277–282.
7. Gustafsson MGL, Agard DA, Sedat JW. Sevenfold improvement of axial resolution in 3D wide-field microscopy using two objective lenses. Proceedings of SPIE. 1995;2412:147–156.
8. Schaefer LH, Schuster D, Herz H. Generalized approach for accelerated maximum likelihood based image restoration applied to three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy. Journal of Microscopy. 2001;204:99–107. [PubMed]
9. Pohl DW, Denk W, Lanz M. Optical stethoscopy: Image recording with resolution lambda/20. Applied Physics Letters. 1984;44:651–653.
10. Betzig E, Trautman JK, Harris TD, Weiner JS, Kostelak RL. Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Optical Microscopy on a Nanometric Scale. Science. 1991;251:1468–1470. [PubMed]
11. Novotny L, Hecht B. Principles of Nano-optics. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2006.
12. Hell SW, Wichmann J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Optics Letters. 1994;19:780–782. [PubMed]
13. Klar TA, Jakobs S, Dyba M, Egner A, Hell SW. Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:8206–8210. [PubMed]
14. Schmidt R, Wurm CA, Jakobs S, Engelhardt J, Egner A, Hell SW. Spherical nanosized focal spot unravels the interior of cells. Nat Meth. 2008;5:539–544. [PubMed]
15. Hell SW. Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science. 2007;316:1153–1158. [PubMed]
16. Westphal V, Rizzoli SO, Lauterbach MA, Kamin D, Jahn R, Hell SW. Video-rate far-field optical nanoscopy dissects synaptic vesicle movement. Science. 2008;320:246–249. [PubMed]
17. Gustafsson MGL. Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. J Microsc. 2000;198:82–87. [PubMed]
18. Schermelleh L, Carlton PM, Haase S, Shao L, Winoto L, Kner P, Burke B, Cardoso MC, Agard DA, Gustafsson MGL, et al. Subdiffraction Multicolor Imaging of the Nuclear Periphery with 3D Structured Illumination Microscopy. Science. 2008;320:1332–1336. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Shao L, Isaac B, Uzawa S, Agard DA, Sedat JW, Gustafsson MG. I5S: Widefield Light Microscopy with 100-nm-scale Resolution in Three Dimensions. Biophys J. 2008 doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.120352. [PubMed]
20. Heintzmann R, Jovin TM, Cremer C. Saturated patterned excitation microscopy - a concept for optical resolution improvement. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2002;19:1599–1609. [PubMed]
21. Gustafsson MGL. Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:13081–13086. [PubMed]
22. Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) Nat Methods. 2006;3:793–795. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S, Bonifacino JS, Davidson MW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess HF. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science. 2006;313:1642–1645. [PubMed]
24. Hess ST, Girirajan TP, Mason MD. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys J. 2006;91:4258–4272. [PubMed]
25. Thompson RE, Larson DR, Webb WW. Precise Nanometer Localization Analysis for Individual Fluorescent Probes. Biophys. J. 2002;82:2775–2783. [PubMed]
26. Gelles J, Schnapp BJ, Sheetz MP. Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision. Nature. 1988;331:450–453. [PubMed]
27. Ghosh RN, Webb WW. Automated detection and tracking of individual and clustered cell surface low density lipoprotein receptor molecules. Biophys. J. 1994;66:1301–1318. [PubMed]
28. Yildiz A, Forkey JN, McKinney SA, Ha T, Goldman YE, Selvin PR. Myosin V walks hand-over-hand: single fluorophore imaging with 1.5-nm localization. Science. 2003;300:2061–2065. [PubMed]
29. van Oijen AM, Kohler J, Schmidt J, Muller M, Brakenhoff GJ. 3-Dimensional super-resolution by spectrally selective imaging. Chemical Physics Letters. 1998;292:183–187.
30. Lacoste TD, Michalet X, Pinaud F, Chemla DS, Alivisatos AP, Weiss S. Ultrahigh-resolution multicolor colocalization of single fluorescent probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9461–9466. [PubMed]
31. Churchman LS, Okten Z, Rock RS, Dawson JF, Spudich JA. Single molecule high-resolution colocalization of Cy3 and Cy5 attached to macromolecules measures intramolecular distances through time. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:1419–1423. [PubMed]
32. Gordon MP, Ha T, Selvin PR. Single-molecule high-resolution imaging with photobleaching. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6462–6465. [PubMed]
33. Qu X, Wu D, Mets L, Scherer NF. Nanometer-localized multiple single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11298–11303. [PubMed]
34. Lidke K, Rieger B, Jovin T, Heintzmann R. Superresolution by localization of quantum dots using blinking statistics. Opt. Express. 2005;13:7052–7062. [PubMed]
35. Bates M, Blosser TR, Zhuang X. Short-range spectroscopic ruler based on a single-molecule optical switch. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;94:108101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Ando R, Hama H, Yamamoto-Hino M, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A. An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:12651–12656. [PubMed]
37. Wiedenmann J, Ivanchenko S, Oswald F, Schmitt F, Rocker C, Salih A, Spindler KD, Nienhaus GU. EosFP, a fluorescent marker protein with UV-inducible green-to-red fluorescence conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:15905–15910. [PubMed]
38. Patterson GH, Lippincott-Schwartz J. A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science. 2002;297:1873–1877. [PubMed]
39. Tsutsui H, Karasawa S, Shimizu H, Nukina N, Miyawaki A. Semi-rational engineering of a coral fluorescent protein into an efficient highlighter. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:233–238. [PubMed]
40. Habuchi S, Ando R, Dedecker P, Verheijen W, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A, Hofkens J. Reversible single-molecule photoswitching in the GFP-like fluorescent protein Dronpa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:9511–9516. [PubMed]
41. Ando R, Flors C, Mizuno H, Hofkens J, Miyawaki A. Highlighted generation of fluorescence signals using simultaneous two-color irradiation on Dronpa mutants. Biophys J. 2007;92:L97–99. [PubMed]
42. Stiel AC, Trowitzsch S, Weber G, Andresen M, Eggeling C, Hell SW, Jakobs S, Wahl MC. 1.8 A bright-state structure of the reversibly switchable fluorescent protein Dronpa guides the generation of fast switching variants. Biochem J. 2007;402:35–42. [PubMed]
43. Chudakov DM, Verkhusha VV, Staroverov DB, Souslova EA, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov KA. Photoswitchable cyan fluorescent protein for protein tracking. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1435–1439. [PubMed]
44. Juette MF, Gould TJ, Lessard MD, Mlodzianoski MJ, Nagpure BS, Bennett BT, Hess ST, Bewersdorf J. Three-dimensional sub-100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples. Nat Meth. 2008;5:527–529. [PubMed]
45. Folling J, Belov V, Kunetsky R, Medda R, Schonle A, Egner A, Eggeling C, Bossi M, Hell SW. Photochromic rhodamines provide nanoscopy with optical sectioning. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46:6266–6270. [PubMed]
46. Egner A, Geisler C, von Middendorff C, Bock H, Wenzel D, Medda R, Andresen M, Stiel AC, Jakobs S, Eggeling C, et al. Fluorescence nanoscopy in whole cells by asynchronous localization of photoswitching emitters. Biophys J. 2007;93:3285–3290. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Flors C, Hotta J, Uji-i H, Dedecker P, Ando R, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A, Hofkens J. A Stroboscopic Approach for Fast Photoactivation-Localization Microscopy with Dronpa Mutants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:13970–13977. [PubMed]
48. Kim SY, Gitai Z, Kinkhabwala A, Shapiro L, Moerner WE. Single molecules of the bacterial actin MreB undergo directed treadmilling motion in Caulobacter crescentus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:10929–10934. [PubMed]
49. Sharonov A, Hochstrasser RM. Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18911–18916. [PubMed]
50. Bates M, Huang B, Dempsey GT, Zhuang X. Multicolor super-resolution imaging with photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Science. 2007;317:1749–1753. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Bock H, Geisler C, Wurm CA, Von Middendorff C, Jakobs S, Schonle A, Egner A, Hell SW, Eggeling C. Two-color far-field fluorescence nanoscopy based on photoswitchable emitters. Applied Physics B-Lasers and Optics. 2007;88:161–165.
52. Shroff H, Galbraith CG, Galbraith JA, White H, Gillette J, Olenych S, Davidson MW, Betzig E. Dual-color superresolution imaging of genetically expressed probes within individual adhesion complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:20308–20313. [PubMed]
53. Huang B, Wang W, Bates M, Zhuang X. Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science. 2008;319:810–813. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Kao HP, Verkman AS. Tracking of single fluorescent particles in three dimensions: use of cylindrical optics to encode particle position. Biophys J. 1994;67:1291–1300. [PubMed]
55. Prabhat P, Ram S, Ward ES, Ober RJ. Simultaneous imaging of different focal planes in fluorescence microscopy for the study of cellular dynamics in three dimensions. NanoBioscience, IEEE Transactions. 2004;3:237–242. on. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Speidel M, Jonas A, Florin EL. Three-dimensional tracking of fluorescent nanoparticles with subnanometer precision by use of off-focus imaging. Opt Lett. 2003;28:69–71. [PubMed]
57. Hess ST, Gould TJ, Gudheti MV, Maas SA, Mills KD, Zimmerberg J. Dynamic clustered distribution of hemagglutinin resolved at 40 nm in living cell membranes discriminates between raft theories. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:17370–17375. [PubMed]
58. Kural C, Kim H, Syed S, Goshima G, Gelfand VI, Selvin PR. Kinesin and dynein move a peroxisome in vivo: a tug-of-war or coordinated movement? Science. 2005;308:1469–1472. [PubMed]
59. Nan X, Sims PA, Xie XS. Organelle tracking in a living cell with microsecond time resolution and nanometer spatial precision. Chemphyschem. 2008;9:707–712. [PubMed]
60. Manley S, Gillette JM, Patterson GH, Shroff H, Hess HF, Betzig E, Lippincott-Schwartz J. High-density mapping of single-molecule trajectories with photoactivated localization microscopy. Nat Methods. 2008;5:155–157. [PubMed]
61. Shroff H, Galbraith CG, Galbraith JA, Betzig E. Live-cell photoactivated localization microscopy of nanoscale adhesion dynamics. Nat Methods. 2008;5:417–423. [PubMed]
62. Griffin BA, Adams SR, Tsien RY. Specific covalent labeling of recombinant protein molecules inside live cells. Science. 1998;281:269–272. [PubMed]
63. Guignet EG, Hovius R, Vogel H. Reversible site-selective labeling of membrane proteins in live cells. Nat Biotech. 2004;22:440–444. [PubMed]
64. Fernandez-Suarez M, Baruah H, Martinez-Hernandez L, Xie KT, Baskin JM, Bertozzi CR, Ting AY. Redirecting lipoic acid ligase for cell surface protein labeling with small-molecule probes. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1483–1487. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Popp MW, Antos JM, Grotenbreg GM, Spooner E, Ploegh HL. Sortagging: a versatile method for protein labeling. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:707–708. [PubMed]