PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bloodOriginal ArticleBlood JournalCurrent IssueAbout BloodSubmissionsSubscriptionsContact UsASH Homepage
 
Blood. 2007 September 1; 110(5): 1448–1457.
Prepublished online 2007 April 24. doi:  10.1182/blood-2006-12-060814
PMCID: PMC2629730
Gene Therapy

Lentiviral vectors containing an enhancer-less ubiquitously acting chromatin opening element (UCOE) provide highly reproducible and stable transgene expression in hematopoietic cells

Abstract

Ubiquitously acting chromatin opening elements (UCOEs) consist of methylation-free CpG islands encompassing dual divergently transcribed promoters of housekeeping genes that have been shown to confer resistance to transcriptional silencing and to produce consistent and stable transgene expression in tissue culture systems. To develop improved strategies for hematopoietic cell gene therapy, we have assessed the potential of the novel human HNRPA2B1-CBX3 UCOE (A2UCOE) within the context of a self-inactivating (SIN) lentiviral vector. Unlike viral promoters, the enhancer-less A2UCOE gave rise to populations of cells that expressed a reporter transgene at a highly reproducible level. The efficiency of expression per vector genome was also markedly increased in vivo compared with vectors incorporating either spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) or cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoters, suggesting a relative resistance to silencing. Furthermore, an A2UCOE-IL2RG vector fully restored the IL-2 signaling pathway within IL2RG-deficient human cells in vitro and successfully rescued the X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID-X1) phenotype in a mouse model of this disease. These data indicate that the A2UCOE displays highly reliable transcriptional activity within a lentiviral vector, largely overcoming insertion-site position effects and giving rise to therapeutically relevant levels of gene expression. These properties are achieved in the absence of classic enhancer activity and therefore may confer a high safety profile.

Introduction

Retroviral vector–mediated gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) has become a useful and promising tool for treatment of life-threatening inherited hematologic disorders.16 However, a significant risk of insertional mutagenesis has emerged as evidenced by 4 patients with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID-X1) treated with a Moloney murine leukemia virus (MLV)–based vector developing clonal T-cell lymphoproliferation.610 In 2 patients, the cause appears to be at least in part due to MLV proviral vector integration either within or near the known T-cell proto-oncogene LMO2, which led to up-regulation of its expression, probably mediated via the enhancer elements within the viral long-terminal repeats (LTRs). In another gene therapy trial for chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), nonmalignant amplification of myeloid clones contributed to the efficacy but occurred due to similar spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) LTR-mediated activation of MDS1-EVI1, PRDM16, or SETBP1 genes.6 In animal model systems, retroviral vector transgenes have additionally been susceptible to a substantial reduction and variegation in expression largely attributable to DNA methylation and histone deacetylation.1121

The risk of enhancer-mediated mutagenesis may be partially reduced by the development of self-inactivating (SIN) retroviral vectors in which the U3 region of the 3′ LTR containing the viral enhancer sequence is deleted, leading to inactivation of both LTRs upon integration of the vector provirus into the target cell genome.2225 Transcription of a therapeutic gene within SIN vectors is via an internal promoter. However, all enhancer elements associated with internal regulatory elements will have a potential for mutagenesis, which may be exacerbated by a preference of some vectors for integration either within or close to active transcriptional domains.2628 The development of safer vectors incorporating enhancer-less regulatory elements that are capable of establishing and maintaining a transcriptionally competent chromatin domain, and which give rise to reproducible and stable transgene expression irrespective of tissue type or site of integration, is therefore of considerable interest. The recently described ubiquitously acting chromatin opening element (UCOE)21,29 appears to meet these requirements.

UCOEs consist of a methylation-free CpG island extending over closely spaced, dual divergently transcribed promoters derived from housekeeping gene loci.21,29 The UCOE from the human HNRPA2B1-CBX3 locus (A2UCOE) gives rise to completely stable transgene expression in stably transfected tissue culture cells in the absence of drug selection, even when integrated within centromeric heterochromatin29 rather than the typical rapid functional decline mediated by chromatin components.30 In addition, linking the A2UCOE upstream of CMV promoter–driven cassettes prevents transgene silencing and markedly increases median levels of expression in stably transfected cells, thereby substantially expediting the isolation of lines for the manufacture of therapeutic proteins.21 These data strongly suggest that the A2UCOE possesses a dominant chromatin remodeling or opening function and is therefore able to resist transcriptional silencing effects.

In the present study, we have assessed the efficiency and efficacy of the A2UCOE in regulating transgene expression in vitro and in vivo within lentiviral vectors for possible hematopoietic gene therapy applications. Our data show that the A2UCOE largely overcomes insertion-site position effects, giving rise to a reproducible, stable, and therapeutically relevant pattern of gene expression.

Materials and methods

Plasmid and lentiviral vector construction

The pGL-2 UCOE construct: a 2.2-kb fragment extending from the BamHI site within the first intron of CBX3 to a (BamHI-linkered) TthIII I site just upstream of the ATG translational start codon within exon I of HNRPA2B1 (A2UCOE; Figure 1A) was inserted into the BamHI site of the pGL-2 promoter vector (Promega, Southampton, United Kingdom) downstream of the luciferase reporter gene in both forward and reverse orientations (Figure 2A; pGL-2 UCOE 5′, pGL-2 UCOE 3′). The pGL-2 control plasmid (Promega), which contains the SV40 enhancer in the same position as the A2UCOE, acted as a positive control. Lentiviral A2UCOE-EGFP: a 2.5-kb fragment extending from the EcoRI site within intron 2 of CBX3 to a SalI-linkered TthIII I site within exon I of HNRPA2B1 was inserted between the EcoRI and SalI polylinker sites upstream of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene in pEGFP-N1 (Clontech Laboratories, Oxford, United Kingdom) to give the construct pA2UCOE-EGFP-N1. An EcoRI/NotI fragment of 3.2 kb containing the A2UCOE-EGFP cassette from pA2UCOE-EGFP-N1 was inserted between the EcoRI/XhoI sites of pHR'SINcPPT-CE,31 thereby replacing CMV-EGFP to give pHR'SINcPPT-UCOE-E. The pHR'SINcPPT-SE lentiviral vector31 containing an SFFV-EGFP combination was as previously described.31 Lentiviral A2UCOE-IL2RG: the SFFV promoter from the SINLV-SF-IL2RG vector (kindly provided by Christopher Baum, Hannover Medical School, Germany) was removed by digestion with XhoI/ClaI and the vector was religated after blunting of ends. The 2.2-kb A2UCOE BamH1 fragment was then inserted into a BamHI site upstream of the IL2RG cDNA of the SINLV-IL2RG vector to give A2UCOE-IL2RG (Figure 1B).

Figure 1
Illustration of the human HNRPA2B1-CBX3-NFE2L3 locus and derivation of the A2UCOE. (A, top panel) Gene organization of the HNRPA2B1-CBX3-NFE2L3 locus located at chromosome position 7p15.2 (GenBank accession nos. D28877, AC004520, and AC010677) is shown ...
Figure 2
The A2UCOE lacks classic enhancer activity. (A) Illustration of the pGL-2 plasmid vector–based constructs. The pGL-2 promoter construct consists of a minimal, enhancer-less SV40 promoter driving a luciferase reporter gene. A 2.2-kb BamHI fragment ...

Maintenance of tissue culture cell lines and transient transfection assays with luciferase reporter gene constructs

Human HeLa, HEK293T, and HT1080 cells were maintained in DMEM medium (Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom), whereas the Jurkat and K562 lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, United Kingdom). Transient transfections of HeLa and HT1080 cells were performed using SuperFect (Qiagen, Crawley, United Kingdom) and FuGENE 6 (Roche, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom) with Jurkat and K562 cells. Cell lysates were prepared 24 hours after transfection and protein was quantified using Burton Reagent (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom). Luciferase activities were assessed using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega), with light emission quantified using a FLUOstar OPTIMA luminometer (BMG LABTECH, Aylesburg, United Kingdom) and normalized per mg lysate protein. Statistical analysis was performed using a Student t test.

Lentiviral vector preparation and transduction of cell lines

Lentiviral vectors were produced by transient cotransfection of HEK293T cells with 3 plasmids (the lentiviral vector, pMD.G2 [envelop plasmid], and pCMVΔ8.91 [packaging plasmid, both produced by Plasmid Factory, Bielefeld, Germany]), employing polyethylenimine (PEI; Sigma-Aldrich) as previously described.31 Viral vector titer of EGFP-containing preparations was determined by transducing HeLa, Jurkat, and K562 cells with serial dilutions of virus and monitoring expression after 3 days by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Titer of IL2RG transgene-containing vectors was by transduction of mouse fibroblast SC-1 cells followed by staining with anti–human CD132 (IL2RG) antibody (BD Biosciences, Oxford, United Kingdom) for FACS analysis of IL2RG expression. Lentiviral vectors containing EGFP under control of the A2UCOE, CMV, and SFFV promoters were used to transduce Jurkat, K562, and HeLa cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. Transduced cells were collected every 10 to 14 days for a total period of 78 days of continuous culture and EGFP gene expression analyzed by FACS.

Ex vivo transduction and analysis of murine hematopoietic stem cell transduction with EGFP-lentiviral vectors

All animal experiments were conducted under the Home Office project license number PPL 70/6146. Bone marrow lineage-negative (lin) HSCs were isolated32 from the tibiae and femora of C57BL/6J mice at approximately 10 weeks of age. HSCs were seeded at 1 × 106/mL in StemSpan medium (StemCell Technologies, London, United Kingdom) and transduced with viral vector added at an MOI of 20 to 25. Transduced cells were cultured overnight and then injected into lethally irradiated recipient mice via the tail vein (2.5 × 105 to 5 × 105 cells/mouse).33 Peripheral blood and bone marrow cells were analyzed 3 months after transplantation by flow cytometry for EGFP transgene expression and lineage markers. Remaining cells were collected and stored at −20°C for subsequent isolation of genomic DNA. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon sum rank test (Mann-Whitney test; http://elegans.swmed.edu/~leon/stats/utest.cgi) to assess the significance of differences in expression between A2UCOE-, SFFV-, and CMV-EGFP transgenes.

Determination of EGFP and IL2RG lentiviral vector copy number by PCR

Genomic DNA was isolated from cells using the DNeasy kit (Qiagen). The primers employed for analysis of EGFP reporter gene vector–containing cells by standard (28 cycle) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were as follows: forward, 5′AGCTGACCCTGAAGTTCATCTG3′; reverse, 5′GACGTTGTGGCTGATGTAGTTGTA3′. The mouse titin gene (Ttn)34 was used as an endogenous 2-copy gene control and was amplified with forward primer 5′AAAACGAGCAGTGACCTGAGG3′ and reverse primer 5′TTCAGTCATGCTGCTAGCGC3′ under the same conditions. PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on agarose gels.

Real-time quantitative PCR (QPCR) to determine both EGFP and IL2RG transgene lentiviral vector copy number was performed using an ABI 7000 Sequence Detection System (ABI, Applied Biosystems, Warrington, United Kingdom). The primer sequences for EGFP were as follows: forward, 5′GCTACCCCGACCACATGAAG3′; reverse, 5′CGGGCATGGCGGACTT3′. The EGFP probe sequence was 5′-FAM-CAGCACGACTTCTTC-NFQ. Ttn primer sequences were as described previously in this section. The Ttn probe sequence was 5′-FAM-TGCACGGAATCTCGTCTCAGTC-TAMRA-3′. The IL2RG primer sequences were as follows: forward, 5′AGTAGACGGCATCGCAGCTT3′; reverse, 5′GGCTTCAACATGGCAGTCTAGAG3′. The IL2RG probe sequence was 5′ FAM-TCACGTGGGCGGCG-TAMRA-3′. The primer sequences for the human β-actin gene (ACTB) were as follows: forward, 5′TCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTACGA3′; reverse, 5′CAGCGGAACCGCTCATTGCCAATGG3′. The ACTB probe sequence was 5′-FAM-ATGCCCTCCCCCATGCCA TCCTGCGT-TAMRA-3′.

STAT-5 phosphorylation assay in vitro

ED7R cells derived from an adult human T-cell leukemia line deficient in the IL2RG gene expression35 were cultured in RPMI 1640 plus 10% FCS. Cells were seeded into 12-well plates (105 cells/mL/well) and transduced with the SFFV-IL2RG and A2UCOE-IL2RG lentiviral vectors at different MOIs. On day 3 after transduction, the culture medium was replaced with serum-free medium and incubated overnight. Cells were then washed with PBS and resuspended in RPMI medium alone. Half of the cells were subsequently incubated with 600 ng interleukin-2 (IL-2; Peprotech, London, United Kingdom) at 37°C for 10 minutes followed by incubation with 2 mL prewarmed FACS Lyse/Fix buffer (BD Biosciences, Oxford, United Kingdom) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Cells were then washed in FACS buffer (0.5% BSA/PBS) and permeabilized in cold Perm Buffer III (BD Biosciences) for 30 minutes at 4°C. After washing in FACS buffer, cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in 100 μL FACS buffer containing 5 μL antiphosphorylated STAT-5 antibody (BD Biosciences) and 0.5 μL anti–human IL-2RG (BD Biosciences), and incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed with FACS buffer and fixed with 1% PFA/PBS for analysis by FACS (the protocol kindly provided by Kimberly Gilmour, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom). ED7R cells stably transfected with an IL2RG transgene acted as the positive control.

SCID mouse model and ex vivo lentiviral vector–mediated IL2RG gene transfer

SCID mouse model: triple knock-out (3KO; Il2rg−/−Rag2−/−c5−/−) and 3KO X c57Il2rg−/− (Il2rg−/− Rag2+/+ c5+/+) were generated by crossing Il2rg−/−Rag2−/−c5+/+ mice (obtained from Dr DiSanto, Hopital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France) with A/J mice (Il2rg+/+Rag2+/+c5−/−; Harlan UK Limited, Bicester, United Kingdom). Il2rg−/−Rag2−/−c5−/− mice are deficient in T, B, and natural killer (NK) cells and provide a more complete immunologic defect more closely resembling the human phenotype of the disease. For ex vivo gene transfer, bone marrow was isolated from the tibiae and femora of 3KO X c57Il2rg−/− mice and lin HSCs were purified by standard methods.32 HSCs were transduced at an MOI of 10 for A2UCOE-IL2RG and an MOI of 25 for SFFV-IL2RG. Transduced cells were cultured for 16 to 24 hours and injected into lethally irradiated recipient 3KO mice. At 3 months after transplantation, animals were culled and spleens were isolated and analyzed for immunoreconstitution. Splenocytes were cleared of red blood cells using red cell lysis buffer; stained with anti-CD8, -CD4, -CD3, and -NK1.1 antibodies for T cells, anti-IgM for mature B cells, and anti-B220 for immature B cells (BD Biosciences); and analyzed by FACS. T-cell proliferation assays were performed as previously described.33

Results

The A2UCOE is devoid of classic enhancer function

A minimal 2.2-kb A2UCOE fragment (Figure 1A) is sufficient to direct reproducible and stable EGFP transgene expression in transfected tissue culture cells.29 We assessed whether these properties were associated with classic enhancer activity by using a luciferase reporter gene system (Figure 2A) and transient transfection assays in a variety of human cell lines (carcinoma HeLa cells, fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells, leukemic lymphoblast Jurkat cells, and myelogenous leukemia K562 cells). In contrast to a pGL-2 control vector containing an SV40 enhancer, each configuration of the pGL-2 A2UCOE test constructs exhibited no statistically significant difference in activity compared with that of the enhancer-less pGL-2 promoter plasmid in any of the cell lines (Figure 2B; data not shown). To exclude the possibility that antisense transcripts from the divergent promoters within the A2UCOE were suppressing luciferase gene expression, reverse transcriptase–PCR (RT-PCR) was performed on RNA from transfected HeLa cells. No antisense transcripts were detectable, which may be due to the potential bidirectional nature of the SV40 polyadenylation signal downstream of the luciferase gene (data not shown). These data imply that the A2UCOE lacks classic enhancer activity, which in the context of gene therapy vectors is likely to reduce the risk of enhancer-mediated insertional mutagenesis.

The A2UCOE in a lentiviral vector context provides consistent gene expression in cell lines

The A2UCOE can drive reproducible, stable, and long-term EGFP transgene expression in cell lines in the absence of drug-selective pressure, even when integrated within centromeric heterochromatin.29 We therefore assessed the efficiency and efficacy of the minimal 2.2-kb A2UCOE to regulate EGFP transgene expression within a SIN lentiviral vector system in comparison with the well-characterized CMV and SFFV viral promoters (Figure 1B). K562 (myeloid), Jurkat (lymphoid), and HeLa (carcinoma) cell lines were transduced at an MOI of 1 and analyzed at periodic intervals up to 78 days of continuous culture. The expression profile of polyclonal pools of cells transduced with the A2UCOE-EGFP vector was relatively reproducible, as indicated by a peak expression profile in all 3 cell lines (Figure 3A). We quantified the variation in the range of expression by reference to the coefficient of variation (CV; a parameter shown in histogram/plot statistics) by FACS for EGFP-expressing cells (Figure 3A). A2UCOE-EGFP–transduced cells consistently gave lower CV values than the SFFV and particularly CMV promoters, even though relative total transduction efficiencies as assessed by EGFP fluorescence were similar. This distinct difference in the expression profile between the A2UCOE and viral promoters was maintained over the entire 78-day period of cell culture (data not shown). We further explored these findings by assessing EGFP expression by FACS analysis of transduced HeLa cell clones (Figure 3B) carrying a singe copy of vector (confirmed by Southern-blot analysis; data not shown). In marked contrast to the CMV-EGFP vector, all A2UCOE-EGFP clones exhibited a very similar level of fluorescence intensity regardless of integration site. Furthermore, the CV values within individual A2UCOE-EGFP clones were markedly lower compared with those with CMV-EGFP (mean CV A2UCOE = 51, range 42-83, n = 8; CMV = 210, range 69-336, n = 7; Figure S1, available on the Blood website; see the Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article). The consistent and stable transgene expression pattern between cells transduced with the A2UCOE-EGFP vector suggests that this element is less susceptible to insertion-site position effects.

Figure 3
An A2UCOE regulatory element within a lentiviral vector confers consistent transgene expression. (A) Lentiviral vectors containing an EGFP reporter gene under the control of the A2UCOE, SFFV, or CMV promoters (Figure 1B) were used to transduce Jurkat ...

The A2UCOE-EGFP vector gives rise to reproducible transgene expression in hematopoietic cells in vivo

The A2UCOE-, SFFV-, or CMV-EGFP lentiviral vectors (Figure 1B) were used in an ex vivo protocol to transduce C57BL/6J murine bone marrow–derived HSCs that were then engrafted into lethally irradiated recipients. At 3 months after transplantation, bone marrow and peripheral blood cells were harvested and analyzed for EGFP expression and vector copy number. In experiment 1, HSCs were transduced at an MOI of 20 and engrafted into 6 recipient mice (2 animals per vector). In experiment 2, HSCs were transduced at an MOI of 25 and engrafted into 9 recipients (3 animals per vector). The initial transduction efficiency was assessed by FACS analysis 2 days following ex vivo infection and was found to be similar in all cases (data not shown). However, at 3 months after transplantation, a consistently higher percentage of EGFP-positive cells was found among the A2UCOE-EGFP vector recipient animals compared with those transduced by the SFFV- and CMV-regulated constructs, both in bone marrow and peripheral blood cells (Figure 4A). The mean percentage of EGFP-expressing cells transduced by the A2UCOE-EGFP vector from the 2 sets of experimental mice was 25.6%, which is 2.5-fold and 6.2-fold higher than the SFFV and CMV constructs, respectively, in bone marrow cells (Figure 4A left). Similarly, in peripheral blood from the same animals, the mean percentage of EGFP-positive cells transduced by the A2UCOE-EGFP vector was 23.9%, which is 2.1-fold and 2.8-fold higher than that observed in SFFV and CMV vector–transduced cells, respectively (Figure 4A right). Of greater significance in the context of this study, EGFP-expressing cells transduced by the A2UCOE-EGFP vector appeared as discrete peaks in the fluorescence intensity profiles both in bone marrow and peripheral blood (Figure 4B, UCOE panels).

Figure 4
The A2UCOE-EGFP vector gives rise to consistent transgene expression in bone marrow and peripheral blood hematopoietic cells in vivo. HSCs were isolated from the bone marrow of C57BL/6J mice and transduced with the A2UCOE-EGFP, SFFV-EGFP, and CMV-EGFP ...

The profile of EGFP transgene–expressing cells in different hematopoietic cell lineages was then determined in peripheral blood. Representative plots for each test group of animals are shown in Figure 4C and a compilation of data sets from all animals is summarized in Figure 4D. EGFP expression for all 3 vectors is distributed in all cell lineages (Figure 4D), suggesting that long-lived HSCs were successfully transduced. The average percentage of EGFP-positive cells given by the A2UCOE-EGFP vector was clearly higher in each lineage when compared with the other vectors.

Taken together, these data suggest that the SFFV and particularly CMV promoters are highly prone to position effects and silencing, resulting in a variable expression pattern. In contrast, the consistent peak transgene expression profiles conferred by the A2UCOE show that this element can largely overcome insertion-site position effects, giving rise to stable and reproducible transgene expression in HSCs and their progeny in vivo.

A2UCOE gives more reliable expression per vector copy than SFFV or CMV

We quantified the efficiency of A2UCOE-EGFP expression in comparison to the SFFV and CMV constructs by determining vector copy number and correlated this to the mean percentage of cells expressing EGFP within bone marrow of mice. Genomic DNA from bone marrow of all transplant recipients (Figure 4) was assayed by QPCR employing primers for the EGFP gene. Simultaneous amplification of murine Ttn sequences acted as an endogenous 2-copy gene control. Initial PCR analysis showed that the transgene is present in all recipients (Figure 5A). Following QPCR, comparison of the EGFP and Ttn amplification products showed that, in general, the average vector copy number in recipients of HSCs transduced with the A2UCOE-EGFP construct were significantly lower than those harboring the SFFV- and CMV-EGFP vectors (Figure 5B; Table 1). The average copy number across all samples for each vector was 0.25 per cell (range, 0.13 to 0.44 per cell) for the A2UCOE group, 0.96 per cell (range, 0.02 to 1.3 per cell) for SFFV, and 3.7 per cell (range, 1.2 to 6.5 per cell) for CMV vector recipients. A comparison of average vector copy number with average EFGP expression in bone marrow (Table 1) reveals a 1:1 correlation for the EGFP transgene regulated by the A2UCOE. In marked contrast, the ratio of expression to vector copy number is 1:9 for the SFFV and 1:90 for the CMV vectors (Table 1), which is indicative of either very low levels of expression per transgene or, more likely, extensive transgene silencing.17,18

Figure 5
A2UCOE-EGFP gives stable, high efficiency expression per vector copy. (A) Genomic DNA derived from bone marrow of mice that received transplants ex vivo of HSCs transduced with the CMV-EGFP, SFFV-EGFP, and A2UCOE-EGFP vectors (Figure 4) was subjected ...
Table 1
Correlation of lentiviral vector copy number with EGFP-positive cells in bone marrow of mice that received a transplant ex vivo

As noted previously, the A2UCOE-EGFP expression profile frequently manifested as discrete peaks (Figure 5C left), which may consist of pools of cells harboring similar vector copy numbers and expression levels. We tested this possibility by sorting A2UCOE-EGFP–expressing cells according to fluorescence intensity and determining vector copy number by QPCR (Figure 5A,B). EGFP-expressing cells from the peak with lower fluorescence intensity (gate 1) carried a single copy of the vector, whereas the higher fluorescence intensity (gate 2) population contained an average of 2 copies per cell (Figure 5C). Overall, these data provide good evidence that the A2UCOE can prevent transgene silencing and give rise to stable and consistently reproducible expression levels when introduced into HSCs in vivo, which is reflective of its dominant chromatin opening function.21,29 Furthermore, the positive trend of transgene expression correlating with copy number is a property akin to that observed with locus control regions (LCRs).36

Functional reconstitution of IL-2R by A2UCOE-IL2RG

X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency is an immune disorder caused by mutations in the interleukin-2 receptor gamma gene (IL2RG), which encodes the common cytokine receptor gamma chain (γc, CD132). A key signaling pathway activated by IL-2 is phosphorylation of STAT-5 by JAK3. In order to determine whether the A2UCOE can direct a therapeutic level of IL2RG expression, human ED-7R cells, which are deficient in γc, were transduced with vectors containing either the A2UCOE-IL2RG or SFFV-IL2RG cDNA transcription unit (Figure 1B) at different MOIs. At 4 days after transduction, cells were stimulated with IL-2 and subsequently stained with antiphosphorylated STAT-5 (pSTAT-5) antibodies and analyzed by FACS. Expression of pSTAT-5 was readily detected at low MOIs and reached saturation at an MOI of 5 (Figure 6, A2UCOE-IL2RG panels). A parallel increase in γc levels was also demonstrated (Figure S2). The efficiency of rescue of pSTAT-5 function seemed higher with the A2UCOE-IL2RG than the SFFV-IL2RG vector (Figure 6, compare A2UCOE-IL2RG and SFFV-IL2RG panels). In order to quantify expression and determine whether this is indeed the case, vector copy number was assessed by QPCR and, as expected, increased steadily with increasing MOI (Table 2). At presaturation levels (MOI of 0.1-1), higher percentages of pSTAT-5–positive cells were achieved per copy with the A2UCOE-IL2RG–transduced populations compared with SFFV-IL2RG–transduced populations (Table 2). This suggests a higher functional efficiency of the A2UCOE compared with the SFFV promoter in regulating IL2RG expression in this in vitro assay, which is in agreement with the results obtained with the EGFP reporter gene constructs (Figures 4,,5).5). The slight discrepancy between copy number and the percentage of pSTAT-5–expressing cells is most likely due to limitations in the accuracy of quantification by FACS and QPCR.

Figure 6
Rescue of JAK3-mediated STAT-5 tyrosine phosphorylation in human ED-7R cells. The A2UCOE-IL2RG and SFFV-IL2RG lentiviral vectors (Figure 1B) were used to transduce human ED-7R cells at MOIs of 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5. At 4 days following transduction, cells ...
Table 2
Correlation of IL2RG lentiviral vector copy number with restoration of pSTAT-5 in IL2RG-defficient human ED-7R cells

Immunologi reconstitution in a mouse model of SCID-X1

We next tested the efficacy of the A2UCOE in vivo in a mouse model of SCID-X1 gene therapy. HSCs isolated from SCID-X1 mice (3KO X c57Il2rg−/−) were transduced with the A2UCOE-IL2RG vector (Figure 1B) at an MOI of 10 and engrafted into 5 lethally irradiated recipients (Il2rg−/−, Rag2−/−, c5−/−; 2 in group 1 and 3 in group 2). In an independent experiment, HSCs were transduced with an SFFV-IL2RG vector (Figure 1B) at an MOI of 25. At 15 weeks after transplantation, animals were killed and the bone marrow, spleens, and thymi were removed and analyzed for immunologic reconstitution. Western-blot analysis of extracts from bone marrow revealed that IL2RG protein was present in all mice transduced with the A2UCOE-IL2RG vector (Figure S3). FACS analysis showed that in all animals treated with A2UCOE-IL2RG, the levels of T, B, and NK cells were substantially restored when compared with a wild-type control and with equivalent levels observed previously with therapeutic gammaretroviral vectors (Figure 7A; Table 3; S.I.T., A.S., S.J.H., and A.J.T., manuscript in preparation). T-cell proliferative responses to Concanavalin A (ConA) and IL-2 were also restored (Figure 7B). Reconstitution of SFFV-IL2RG–treated animals appeared less complete, but a statistical comparison was not possible due to small sample numbers. We also assessed transgene copy number in spleens recovered from treated SCID-X1 recipient animals by QPCR. The mean vector copy number in recipients transduced with A2UCOE-IL2RG (0.072 per cell; range, 0.03 to 0.19 per cell) was lower than in those transduced with SFFV-IL2RG (0.19 per cell; range, 0.12 to 0.26 per cell), which is in keeping with the different MOIs during initial transduction.

Figure 7
Efficient immunologic reconstitution in mice following ex vivo bone marrow HSC gene transfer. (A) HSCs from SCID-X1 mice were transduced with either the A2UCOE-IL2RG or SFFV-IL2RG lentiviral vectors (Figure 1B) and transplanted into lethally irradiated ...
Table 3
Reconstitution in spleens of mice following ex vivo bone marrow HSC gene transfer with the A2UCOE-IL2RG and SFFV-IL2RG lentiviral vector

Discussion

Strategies that minimize the possibility of insertional mutagenesis by integrating viral vectors and yet retain functional levels of gene expression have recently become a major priority. The efficacy of gene transfer in vivo has in many cases been compromised by instability (high variability, silencing) of transgene expression from viral promoters.17,18 Furthermore, potentially mutagenic enhancer activity may be maintained even when linked promoters are silenced by DNA methylation (Wang et al37; and Manuel Grez, oral communication, at European Society for Gene Therapy conference, November 2006). We show for the first time that A2UCOE-regulated transgenes within lentiviral vectors produce a high, consistent, and homogeneous population of expressing cells that is not prone to gene silencing both in vitro (Figure 3) and more importantly within either HSCs or their progeny in vivo (Figure 4). A comparison of the average number of EGFP-positive cells with average vector copy number in bone marrow of recipient mice at 3 months after ex vivo transplantation indicates that almost all A2UCOE-EGFP transgenes are continuing to be successfully transcribed (Figure 5; Table 1). In marked contrast, the majority of EGFP transgenes under control of the SFFV and especially the CMV viral promoters appear to be subject to silencing under the same transduction and model conditions (Figure 5; Table 1).

We have found no classic enhancer function to be associated with the A2UCOE (Figure 2). This supports our previous suggestions that this element functions by virtue of its methylation-free CpG island status and divergent promoter activity generating a dominant transcriptional activating and chromatin remodeling function.21,29 This lack of enhancer function within the A2UCOE suggests that it should possess a far lower potential for inadvertent activation of genes in the vicinity of the vector integration site than enhancer-associated promoters. Formal evidence that this element is less mutagenic is under investigation. The divergent transcription from the A2UCOE through a nearby promoter could also potentially have either an activating or negative interference effect. However, our latest work shows that the placement of the A2UCOE upstream of tissue-specific promoter/enhancer combinations does not interfere with the specificity of these elements (Talbot, Waddington, M.A., Santilli, A.J.T., unpublished results). This suggests that the open chromatin environment established by the UCOE simply allows a linked, nearby promoter to function with its normal specificity and capacity. Nevertheless, potential problems of UCOE-mediated host promoter activation/inhibition can be avoided by placement of a transcriptional termination element 5′ of the A2UCOE. This would limit the divergent transcription-mediated chromatin opening function of the A2UCOE to the transgene region. These types of modifications are part of future long-term developments of this system.

The ability of the A2UCOE to largely negate position effects is further exemplified by the positive trend by this element to confer expression that is proportional to transgene copy number (Figure 5C; see Antoniou et al29). This property of the A2UCOE is akin to that possessed by LCRs, which are tissue-specific elements that participate in processes that establish a transcriptionally permissive chromatin structure, thereby protecting against position effects and repressive chromatin.35,38,39 Components of the human erythroid–specific HBB40,41 and T-cell specific CD242 LCRs have been incorporated into lentiviral vectors and have been found to partially overcome position effects resulting in more reproducible gene expression. However, the tissue-specific nature of LCRs and their general large size36 places significant restrictions on their utility, which has resulted in suboptimal functioning and only partial negation of insertion-site position effects.40,41 In addition, the potent enhancer-like properties possessed by LCR elements may cause insertional mutagenesis, compounded by the fact that LCRs have been shown to activate heterologous promoters (Greaves et al43; Collis et al44; M.A. and Grosveld45). The small size of the A2UCOE means that it is readily adaptable for incorporation into vectors with limiting capacity21,29 (Figure 1A) and, being derived from a housekeeping gene locus, it is capable of being active in all cell types (Figures 3--7;7; Williams et al21; M.A. et al29; and M.A., Edwards, Holdstock, Mountain and Crombie, unpublished results). Studies have also shown that even without enhancer activity, A2UCOE can be successfully employed in combination with heterologous promoters (Williams et al21; and Talbot, Waddington, and M.A., unpublished results). Therefore, apart from circumstances when exceptionally high levels of protein product are required to reach a therapeutic threshold (for example, HBB in thalassemia and sickle cell disease), which would necessitate the use of an LCR element,40,41 the versatility of the A2UCOE makes it highly attractive for generating standard vectors for a wide range of gene transfer applications.

The phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK1) and elongation factor 1α (EF1α) housekeeping gene promoters have also been used to regulate expression of various transgenes. However, based on our studies with A2UCOE-like dual divergently transcribed housekeeping gene promoters (Williams et al21; M.A. et al29), we would predict that CpG island–associated single promoters such as PGK1 and EF1α would be prone to insertion-site position effects and silencing, as has recently been found to be the case following in vivo transplantation of transduced cells.16,20,46 Flanking transgenes with insulator elements has also been attempted to minimize position effects and insertional mutagenesis.47,48 The insulator that has been most frequently employed within gammaretroviral and lentiviral vectors is the cHS4 element from the chicken β-globin (HBB_CHICK) LCR.48 This element has at best given only partial protection from position effects in a cell-type–dependent manner.48,49,50 Furthermore, no experimental data are as yet available to show whether 5′ and 3′ flanking insulators protect host gene promoters from activation by enhancer or LCR-type elements that may be regulating expression of the transgene. As insulators in lentiviral vectors have been found to provide only partial protection of the transgene from insertion-site position effects, these elements are unlikely to completely negate gene activation through insertional mutagenesis. The simple enhancer-less configuration of the A2UCOE and its ability to function as a single internal element avoids these potential problems.

Our data show that the A2UCOE is able to consistently drive therapeutic IL2RG cDNA expression, thereby restoring gene function efficiently both in vitro and in vivo, even at relatively low MOI and vector copy number and at an efficiency exceeding that obtained from the SFFV promoter in vitro and possibly in vivo. These findings are consistent with our observation that in marked contrast to the SFFV and especially the CMV promoters, the A2UCOE is not prone to transcriptional silencing and that the majority of vector integration events are stably productive, giving rise to an efficient rescue of IL2RG deficiency both in vitro (Figure 6) and in vivo (Figure 7; Table 3). Importantly, these data suggest that therapeutic efficacy may be achieved with a much lower vector dose using A2UCOE-regulated transgenes compared with conventional viral promoter/enhancer elements. This may have significant advantages in terms of mutagenic risk.

In summary, our data provide compelling evidence that the A2UCOE retains its dominant chromatin opening and transcriptional activating functions21,29 within a lentiviral vector context and is therefore able to largely overcome insertion-site position effects and give rise to reproducible and stable transgene expression. Furthermore, the enhancer-less nature of the A2UCOE implies that it should possess far lower insertional mutagenesis activation potential than commonly used enhancer-associated viral and nonviral promoters.

Acknowledgments

Assistance with the statistical analysis by Cathryn Lewis is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks to Luigi Naldini for the lentiviral packaging plasmids, which were produced by the Plasmid Factory. Thanks also to Ian Alexander for the gift of ED7R and ED7R-γc cell lines and Christopher Baum for the SINLV-SF-IL2RG vector.

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (A.J.T.), Medical Research Council United Kingdom (S.I.T.), the Department of Health (M.U., F.Z.), the Chronic Granulomatous Disorder Research Trust, and European Union Framework VI program CONSERT (LSHB-CT-2004-005242).

Footnotes

The online version of this article contains a data supplement.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Authorship

Contribution: F.Z., S.I.T., S.J.H., M.U., A.S., and J.S. conducted experimental work. H.B.G., C.K., M.A., and A.J.T. contributed to the design and supervision of the study. F.Z., M.A., and A.J.T. wrote the manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: Author Michael Antoniou is an inventor on a patent for biotechnological application of UCOE. All other authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Adrian J. Thrasher, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Molecular Immunology Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom; e-mail: a.thrasher/at/ich.ucl.ac.uk, or Michael Antoniou, Nuclear Biology Group, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Kings College London School of Medicine-Guy's Campus, 8th Floor Guy's Tower, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom; e-mail: michael.antoniou/at/genetics.kcl.ac.uk.

References

1. Cavazzana-Calvo M, Hacein-Bey S, de Saint BG, et al. Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease. Science. 2000;288:669–672. [PubMed]
2. Aiuti A, Slavin S, Aker M, et al. Correction of ADA-SCID by stem cell gene therapy combined with nonmyeloablative conditioning. Science. 2002;296:2410–2413. [PubMed]
3. Gaspar HB, Parsley KL, Howe S, et al. Gene therapy of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by use of a pseudotyped gammaretroviral vector. Lancet. 2004;364:2181–2187. [PubMed]
4. Gaspar HB, Bjorkegren E, Parsley K, et al. Successful reconstitution of immunity in ADA-SCID by stem cell gene therapy following cessation of PEG-ADA and use of mild preconditioning. Mol Ther. 2006;14:505–513. [PubMed]
5. Schmidt M, Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Wissler M, et al. Clonal evidence for the transduction of CD34(+) cells with lymphomyeloid differentiation potential and self-renewal capacity in the SCID-X1 gene therapy trial. Blood. 2005;105:2699–2706. [PubMed]
6. Ott MG, Schmidt M, Schwarzwaelder K, et al. Correction of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease by gene therapy, augmented by insertional activation of MDS1-EVI1, PRDM16 or SETBP1. Nat Med. 2006;12:401–409. [PubMed]
7. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von KC, Schmidt M, et al. LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science. 2003;302:415–419. [PubMed]
8. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von KC, Schmidt M, et al. A serious adverse event after successful gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:255–256. [PubMed]
9. Seggewiss R, Pittaluga S, Adler RL, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia associated with retroviral gene transfer to hematopoietic progenitor cells of a rhesus macaque. Blood. 2006;107:3865–3867. [PubMed]
10. Nienhuis AW, Dunbar CE, Sorrentino BP. Genotoxicity of retroviral integration in hematopoietic cells. Mol Ther. 2006;13:1031–1049. [PubMed]
11. Hoeben RC, Migchielsen AA, van der Jagt RC, van OH, van der Eb AJ. Inactivation of the Moloney murine leukemia virus long terminal repeat in murine fibroblast cell lines is associated with methylation and dependent on its chromosomal position. J Virol. 1991;65:904–912. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Challita PM, Kohn DB. Lack of expression from a retroviral vector after transduction of murine hematopoietic stem cells is associated with methylation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:2567–2571. [PubMed]
13. Razin A. CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing: a three-way connection. EMBO J. 1998;17:4905–4908. [PubMed]
14. Klug CA, Cheshier S, Weissman IL. Inactivation of a GFP retrovirus occurs at multiple levels in long-term repopulating stem cells and their differentiated progeny. Blood. 2000;96:894–901. [PubMed]
15. Lorincz MC, Schubeler D, Hutchinson SR, Dickerson DR, Groudine M. DNA methylation density influences the stability of an epigenetic imprint and Dnmt3a/b-independent de novo methylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:7572–7580. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Yao S, Osborne CS, Bharadwaj RR, et al. Retrovirus silencer blocking by the cHS4 insulator is CTCF independent. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:5317–5323. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Ellis J. Silencing and variegation of gammaretrovirus and lentivirus vectors. Hum Gene Ther. 2005;16:1241–1246. [PubMed]
18. Sinn PL, Sauter SL, McCray PB. Gene therapy progress and prospects: development of improved lentiviral and retroviral vectors - design, biosafety, and production. Gene Ther. 2005;12:1089–1098. [PubMed]
19. Doerfler W, Remus R, Muller K, et al. The fate of foreign DNA in mammalian cells and organisms. Dev Biol (Basel) 2001;106:89–97. [PubMed]
20. Rosenqvist N, Hard Af, Segerstad C, Samuelsson C, Johansen J, Lundberg C. Activation of silenced transgene expression in neural precursor cell lines by inhibitors of histone deacetylation. J Gene Med. 2002;4:248–257. [PubMed]
21. Williams S, Mustoe T, Mulcahy T, et al. CpG-island fragments from the HNRPA2B1/CBX3 genomic locus reduce silencing and enhance transgene expression from the hCMV promoter/enhancer in mammalian cells. BMC Biotechnol. 2005;5:17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Zufferey R, Dull T, Mandel RJ, et al. Self-inactivating lentivirus vector for safe and efficient in vivo gene delivery. J Virol. 1998;72:9873–9880. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Modlich U, Kustikova OS, Schmidt M, et al. Leukemias following retroviral transfer of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) are driven by combinatorial insertional mutagenesis. Blood. 2005;105:4235–4246. [PubMed]
24. Modlich U, Bohne J, Schmidt M, et al. Cell-culture assays reveal the importance of retroviral vector design for insertional genotoxicity. Blood. 2006;108:2545–2553. [PubMed]
25. Kraunus J, Schaumann DH, Meyer J, et al. Self-inactivating retroviral vectors with improved RNA processing. Gene Ther. 2004;11:1568–1578. [PubMed]
26. Mitchell RS, Beitzel BF, Schroder AR, et al. Retroviral DNA integration: ASLV, HIV, and MLV show distinct target site preferences. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:E234. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Wu X, Li Y, Crise B, Burgess SM. Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration. Science. 2003;300:1749–1751. [PubMed]
28. Trono D. Virology: picking the right spot. Science. 2003;300:1670–1671. [PubMed]
29. Antoniou M, Harland L, Mustoe T, et al. Transgenes encompassing dual-promoter CpG islands from the human TBP and HNRPA2B1 loci are resistant to heterochromatin-mediated silencing. Genomics. 2003;82:269–279. [PubMed]
30. Pikaart MJ, Recillas-Targa F, Felsenfeld G. Loss of transcriptional activity of a transgene is accompanied by DNA methylation and histone deacetylation and is prevented by insulators. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2852–2862. [PubMed]
31. Demaison C, Parsley K, Brouns G, et al. High-level transduction and gene expression in hematopoietic repopulating cells using a human immunodeficiency [correction of imunodeficiency] virus type 1-based lentiviral vector containing an internal spleen focus forming virus promoter. Hum Gene Ther. 2002;13:803–813. [PubMed]
32. Chung YJ, Park BB, Kang YJ, et al. Unique effects of Stat3 on the early phase of hematopoietic stem cell regeneration. Blood. 2006;108:1208–1215. [PubMed]
33. Otsu M, Anderson SM, Bodine DM, et al. Lymphoid development and function in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency mice after stem cell gene therapy. Mol Ther. 2000;1:145–153. [PubMed]
34. Charrier S, Stockholm D, Seye K, et al. A lentiviral vector encoding the human Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein corrects immune and cytoskeletal defects in WASP knockout mice. Gene Ther. 2005;12:597–606. [PubMed]
35. Ishii N, Asao H, Kimura Y, et al. Impairment of ligand binding and growth signaling of mutant IL-2 receptor gamma-chains in patients with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. J Immunol. 1994;153:1310–1317. [PubMed]
36. Li Q, Peterson KR, Fang X, Stamatoyannopoulos G. Locus control regions. Blood. 2002;100:3077–3086. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Wang L, Robbins PB, Carbonaro DA, Kohn DB. High-resolution analysis of cytosine methylation in the 5long terminal repeat of retroviral vectors. Hum Gene Ther. 1998;9:2321–2330. [PubMed]
38. Bottardi S, Aumont A, Grosveld F, Milot E. Developmental stage-specific epigenetic control of human beta-globin gene expression is potentiated in hematopoietic progenitor cells prior to their transcriptional activation. Blood. 2003;102:3989–3997. [PubMed]
39. Dean A. On a chromosome far, far away: LCRs and gene expression. Trends Genet. 2006;22:38–45. [PubMed]
40. Persons DA, Tisdale JF. Gene therapy for the hemoglobin disorders. Semin Hematol. 2004;41:279–286. [PubMed]
41. Sadelain M. Recent advances in globin gene transfer for the treatment of beta-thalassemia and sickle cell anemia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2006;13:142–148. [PubMed]
42. Indraccolo S, Minuzzo S, Roccaforte F, et al. Effects of CD2 locus control region sequences on gene expression by retroviral and lentiviral vectors. Blood. 2001;98:3607–3617. [PubMed]
43. Greaves DR, Wilson FD, Lang G, Kioussis D. Human CD2 3′-flanking sequences confer high-level, T cell-specific, position-independent gene expression in transgenic mice. Cell. 1989;56:979–986. [PubMed]
44. Collis P, Antoniou M, Grosveld F. Definition of the minimal requirements within the human beta-globin gene and the dominant control region for high level expression. EMBO J. 1990;9:233–240. [PubMed]
45. Antoniou M, Grosveld F. beta-globin dominant control region interacts differently with distal and proximal promoter elements. Genes Dev. 1990;4:1007–1013. [PubMed]
46. Chang AH, Stephan MT, Sadelain M. Stem cell-derived erythroid cells mediate long-term systemic protein delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1017–1021. [PubMed]
47. West AG, Gaszner M, Felsenfeld G. Insulators: many functions, many mechanisms. Genes Dev. 2002;16:271–288. [PubMed]
48. Gaszner M, Felsenfeld G. Insulators: exploiting transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:703–713. [PubMed]
49. Jakobsson J, Rosenqvist N, Thompson L, Barraud P, Lundberg C. Dynamics of transgene expression in a neural stem cell line transduced with lentiviral vectors incorporating the cHS4 insulator. Exp Cell Res. 2004;298:611–623. [PubMed]
50. Puthenveetil G, Scholes J, Carbonell D, et al. Successful correction of the human beta-thalassemia major phenotype using a lentiviral vector. Blood. 2004;104:3445–3453. [PubMed]

Articles from Blood are provided here courtesy of American Society of Hematology