Until recently, aerobic degradation of chlorocatechols was assumed to be due exclusively to enzymes of the chlorocatechol pathway, including chlorocatechol dioxygenase, chloromuconate cycloisomerase, DLH, and MAR. However, recent studies have indicated that bacterial routes for channeling chlorocatechol into central metabolic pathways are more diverse than previously thought. In 1995, Arensdorf and Focht (
1) described the degradation of 4-chlorobenzoate via 4-chlorocatechol and a
meta cleavage pathway, and similarly, Hollender et al. (
19) proposed that degradation of 4-chlorophenol via
meta cleavage of 4-chlorocatechol occurs in a
Comamonas isolate.
P. putida GJ31 grows on chlorobenzene via
meta cleavage of 3-chlorocatechol (
27). This strain was shown to contain a novel chlorocatechol 2,3-dioxygenase, which transforms 3-chlorocatechol into 2-hydroxymuconate, a central intermediate in classical
meta cleavage routes, and thus obviously rapidly hydrolyzes the initially formed acylchloride (
20), which otherwise was suggested to be a suicide substrate for catechol 2,3-dioxygenases (
3).
Another route of 3-chlorocatechol degradation has recently been reported for
R. opacus (
28). This organism has an MCI which is highly active with the 3-chlorocatechol ring cleavage product 2-chloromuconate but, like proteobacterial MCIs, is not capable of dehalogenating. In fact, the organism recruits an enzyme whose sequence is similar to the sequences of muconolactone isomerases to dehalogenate the cycloisomerization product 5-chloromuconolactone. The ability to dehalogenate 5-chloromuconolactone has also been reported for muconolactone isomerases of the 3-oxoadipate pathway (
37) and seems to be an ability that is shared generally by muconolactone isomerases (
36).
Protoanemonin, a highly toxic intermediate, was recently shown to be the dominant product formed from 3-chloromuconate by MCIs (
5). Since in
Pseudomonas sp. strain MT1, as well as
Pseudomonas sp. strain RW10, only enzymes of the 3-oxoadipate pathway have been observed, it has been suggested that these organisms have a new route for 4-chlorocatechol degradation in which protoanemonin is an intermediate (
32,
57). However, in these organisms no protoanemonin-hydrolyzing activity formed the postulated pathway intermediate
cis-acetylacrylate (
9,
57; this study).
In this study we found that the amount of protoanemonin formed from 3-chloromuconate depends on whether single purified cycloisomerases or combinations of enzymes are used for conversion. Thus, 3-chloromuconate conversion by a purified MCI of
Pseudomonas sp. strain MT1 resulted in high concentrations of protoanemonin (Fig. ), as shown previously for MCIs from
Pseudomonas sp. strains B13 and RW10 (
5). The simultaneous presence of MCI and
trans-DLH of MT1, in contrast, yielded considerably lower protoanemonin concentrations but larger amounts of maleylacetate. Similarly, the presence of
trans-DLH during turnover of 3-chloromuconate by MCIB resulted in decreased concentrations of protoanemonin and elevated concentrations of maleylacetate (data not shown). Thus, the possibility that protoanemonin is not an intermediate of the degradative pathway must be considered. Most interestingly, like strain MT1,
Pseudomonas sp. strain RW10 does not form quantitative amounts of protoanemonin when a cell extract of chlorosalicylate-grown cells is confronted with 4-chlorocatechol (
5). Probably, as in MT1, protoanemonin is not the only product of 4-chlorocatechol and 3-chloromuconate transformation.
MT1 obviously contains two 3-chloromuconate-cycloisomerizing activities. One of these activities resembles proteobacterial MCIs with respect to product formation and therefore was designated an MCI. However, this activity had a higher specificity constant for 3-chloromuconate than for muconate (Table ). At the same time the N-terminal sequence was found to exhibit only moderate similarity to the MCIs of other pseudomonads (10 to 14 of 25 amino acids). Thus, the MT1 cycloisomerase may be specialized for 3-chloromuconate conversion and may not have the ability to dehalogenate. This clearly sets the MT1 cycloisomerase apart from known proteobacterial chloromuconate cycloisomerases which form
cis-dienelactone from 3-chloromuconate and obviously have the ability to eliminate chloride (
5,
22,
47).
Studies of the reaction mechanisms of MCI and mandelate racemase have suggested that the reaction proceeds via an enol/enolate (Fig. , reaction B), to which a proton is added to form muconolactone (Fig. , reaction D) (
12). Similarly, the formation of protoanemonin from 3-chloro-
cis,
cis-muconate involves a protonation reaction, as two hydrogen atoms are present on the exocyclic carbon. In contrast, it has been proposed that in the reaction of chloromuconate cycloisomerases with 3-chloromuconate, the corresponding enol/enolate intermediate is not protonated but rather loses the negative charge by chloride abstraction (Fig. , reaction C) (
22). Replacement of Lys169 of
P. putida MCI, which is known to provide the proton for the protonation reaction (
12,
41), by alanine resulted in mutants that were not able to form protoanemonin but rather formed
cis-dienelactone (
22). Thus, a protonation reaction was shown to be necessary for protoanemonin formation but not for
cis-dienelactone formation, and, as proposed by Blasco et al. (
5), 4-chloromuconolactone is the intermediate of MCI-catalyzed cycloisomerization, from which decarboxylation and chloride elimination to form protoanemonin (Fig. , reaction E) occurs. Whether the latter process is spontaneous or enzyme catalyzed has not been directly investigated. If, however, 4-chloromuconolactone is in fact used as a substrate by
trans-DLH, then the findings suggest that 4-chloromuconolactone is the final product of the cycloisomerizing enzyme and that protoanemonin formation from this compound may be a spontaneous reaction.
The proposal that
trans-DLH acts on 4-chloromuconolactone was supported by the ability of the enzyme to act on the substrate analogue 4-fluoromuconolactone, which is known to be a rather stable product (
44). Dehalogenation of 4-chloromuconolactone by MT1
trans-DLH may be expected to resemble the 4-fluoromuconolactone conversion observed with 3-oxoadipate enol-lactone hydolases and proteobacterial DLHs (
42,
43). Some of these enzymes were found to transform 4-fluoromuconolactone mainly to maleylacetate, and based on the reaction mechanism suggested by Cheah et al. (
9) for dienelactone hydrolysis by
cis/trans-DLH of
Pseudomonas sp. strain B13, one may expect that the enzyme nucleophile attacks the lactone carbonyl group (Fig. , reaction F), giving rise to a halohydrin (Fig. , reaction G), which should spontaneously eliminate the halogenide ion (Fig. , reaction H).
The relatedness of MT1
trans-DLH to other hydrolytic enzymes, like those with an α/β-hydrolase fold (
30), including the
cis/trans-DLH family usually involved in chloroaromatic pathways, is not known, and consequently the conclusions concerning dehalogenation mechanisms are highly speculative. In fact, the high level of susceptibility of
trans-DLH to chelators (Table ) suggests that this enzyme differs from other lactone hydrolases in its basic biochemical properties.
In
R. eutropha 335 a
trans-DLH has been reported to be induced during growth of the strain with 4-fluorobenzoate (
46). This enzyme may play a dual role in the degradation and be responsible for direct conversion of 4-fluoromuconolactone, as well as conversion of
trans-dienelactone formed from 4-fluoromuconolactone as a by-product by 3-oxoadipate enol-lactone hydrolase (
42). So far, the natural function of the
R. eutropha trans-DLH is unclear. This enzyme is highly unlikely to have been selected especially for 4-fluorobenzoate catabolism and thus seems to have been recruited for this process by accidental induction. Similarly, the MAR of
R. eutropha 335 (MacA; accession number
AF130250), which also is not part of a specialized gene cluster, is obviously induced and thus recruited for 4-fluorobenzoate degradation (
48).
In Pseudomonas sp. strain MT1 trans-DLH may also be recruited by chance induction. However, it may also be coinduced with MCIB, which, like trans-DLH, is induced to a significantly greater extent in 5-chlorosalicylate-grown cells than in salicylate-grown cells (data not shown). If this were true, then these enzymes might constitute core elements of another highly unusual chlorocatechol degradative pathway. Future studies of the genetic background of MT1 cycloisomerase and trans-DLH should help answer this question.