Taken together, our PCR array data have verified the complexity of the early immune responses following vaccination and challenge with
Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Although IFN-γ responses are frequently being used as a correlate of vaccine-induced protective immunity in preclinical experiments and clinical studies, our results are consistent with previous data which indicate that TB vaccine-induced immunity involves the expression of many genes rather than just a few genes (
8,
12,
20,
25,
27). In our studies, we showed that vaccination with the highly immunogenic attenuated strains followed by an aerosol tuberculous infection induced differential regulation of expression of at least 15 genes encoding immune mediators at 7 to 14 days postchallenge. While the precise biological significance of the up- or downregulation of cytokine expression in the lungs of immunized animals remains uncertain, these early changes do correspond with decreased mycobacterial organ burdens at 1 month postchallenge and increased survival periods for vaccinated mice relative to the levels for naïve controls (
5,
11). Interestingly, the early cytokine and chemokine responses after vaccination with BCG or the Δ
secA2 mutant of
M. tuberculosis were essentially equivalent. These results are consistent with our 4-week postinfection bacterial burden data, which showed that the protection induced by these vaccines against
M. tuberculosis Erdman was statistically indistinguishable in this mouse model. It should be noted that in an earlier study, we demonstrated that mice immunized with the Δ
secA2 mutant survived significantly longer than BCG-vaccinated mice after an aerosol
M. tuberculosis infection (
11). This absence of a direct linear correlation between the day 28 protection data and the survival results is likely due to the enhanced capacity of the Δ
secA2 mutant to induce CD8 T-cell responses. In this mouse model, early pulmonary anti-TB cellular immunity is dominated by CD4 T-cell responses, while antigen-specific CD8 T-cell responses are likely more important during the later phases of the infection (
25). Clearly, this CD4 T-cell dominance is a limitation in assessing early immune responses in mice. To adequately evaluate protective responses evoked by vaccines designed to induce CD8 responses, new models which can assess vaccine-induced immunity at later phases of the infection are needed.
While the live, attenuated strains are clearly highly immunogenic, immunization with the SD1 DNA vaccine also induced anti-TB protection in the lung and modest pulmonary cytokine responses in this mouse model. Despite decreased relative IFN-γ responses in the SD1 DNA-vaccinated mice (compared to the levels for the attenuated vaccine strains), the expression levels of the CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokines were still substantially upregulated. These results, coupled with previous data, suggest that to generate a modest protective response, early postinfection IFN-γ expression (probably from memory T cells) is needed to activate macrophages and to induce early synthesis of the CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokines. Interestingly, these IFN-γ-inducible chemokines possess biological activities associated with both innate and adaptive immune mechanisms. It is well known that CXC chemokines serve as adaptive immune response signals in the recruitment of lymphocytes to infected tissues (
23,
24). Additionally, these peptides have innate defensin-like activities and can inactivate microbial pathogens, such as
Escherichia coli,
Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and
Listeria monocytogenes (
3,
19). Clearly, further studies are needed to determine whether the CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokines possess antimycobacterial activity and whether these bactericidal properties may contribute to early control of
M. tuberculosis infections.
The roles of the other up (or down)-regulated cytokines (including Gdf3, IL-17f, IL-21, and IL-27) in the generation of enhanced anti-TB protection are also uncertain. For example, IL-17 expression has been shown to be critical in the host pulmonary response to organisms such as
Klebsiella pneumoniae and
Bordetella pertussis as well as
M. tuberculosis (
1,
10,
14). Khader et al. proposed that vaccination against
M. tuberculosis induces IL-17-producing CD4 T cells that evoke chemokine production, which ultimately leads to recruitment of IFN-γ-producing CD4 cells to the lung (
14). Although the induction of chemokine expression is directly relevant to the anti-TB protective response, it is unclear whether other well-known activities of IL-17, including neutrophil recruitment and maintenance of granulopoietic responses, are important for limiting
M. tuberculosis growth in vaccinated mice (
16). Moreover, the anti-TB protective roles of IL-21 and IL-27 need to be clarified. Although the upregulation of IL-21 and IL-27 responses have been shown to stimulate T-cell proliferation and promote Th1 responses, these molecules can also regulate pathogen-induced immune responses by suppressing effector T-cell cytokine production (
13,
17,
22). Whether IL-21 and IL-27 amplify Th1-type responses or limit potentially dangerous inflammatory responses in vaccinated mice after infection is unclear. It has recently been shown that the synergistic combination of IL-21 and transforming growth factor β can initiate an alternative pathway for inducing the proinflammatory Th17 cells (
15). It would be of interest to assess whether Gdf3, a transforming growth factor β family member that was shown to be upregulated in this study, has similar Th17-promoting activities when combined with IL-21 (
18).
In sum, by characterizing the pulmonary cytokine and chemokine responses in the lungs of vaccinated mice after a M. tuberculosis aerosol infection, we have identified several immune mediators which may contribute to the anti-TB protective responses induced by TB vaccines. Clearly, these data suggest novel experiments for better understanding the cellular mechanisms of vaccine-induced protection against M. tuberculosis and for further identification of the potential correlates of anti-TB protective immunity.