The Colon Health and Life-Long Exercise Change trial: a randomized trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

Curr Oncol. 2008 December; 15(6): 271–278.

PMCID: PMC2601017

The Colon Health and Life-Long Exercise Change trial: a randomized trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

K.S. Courneya, PhD,^* C.M. Booth, MD,^† S. Gill, MD,^‡ P. O’Brien, MSc,^† J. Vardy, MD, PhD,^§ C.M. Friedenreich, PhD,^|| H.J. Au, MD,^# M.D. Brundage, MD,^† D. Tu, PhD,^† H. Dhillon, MA,^§ and R.M. Meyer, MD^†

^*University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB

^† National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON

^‡ University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC

^§ University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

^|| Alberta Cancer Board, Calgary, AB

^# Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB

Correspondence to: Kerry S. Courneya, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, E-488 Van Vliet Center, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H9 E-mail: kerry.courneya/at/ualberta.ca

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Background

Observational studies indicate that physical activity (pa) is strongly associated with improved disease outcomes in colon cancer survivors, but a randomized controlled trial is needed to determine whether the association is causal and whether new policies to promote exercise are justified.

Purpose

The co.21 Colon Health and Life-Long Exercise Change (challenge) trial undertaken by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (ncic ctg) is designed to determine the effects of a structured pa intervention on outcomes for survivors of high-risk stage ii or iii colon cancer who have completed adjuvant therapy within the previous 2–6 months.

Methods

Trial participants (n = 962) will be stratified by centre, disease stage, body mass index, and performance status, and will be randomly assigned to a structured pa intervention or to general health education materials. The pa intervention will consist of a behavioural support program and supervised pa sessions delivered over a 3-year period, beginning with regular face-to-face sessions and tapering to less frequent face-to-face or telephone sessions. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival. Important secondary endpoints include multiple patient-reported outcomes, objective physical functioning, biologic correlative markers, and an economic analysis.

Summary

Cancer survivors and cancer care professionals are interested in the potential role of PA to improve multiple disease-related outcomes, but a randomized controlled trial is needed to provide compelling evidence to justify changes in health care policies and practice.

Keywords: Behavioural oncology, cancer survivor, disease-free survival, exercise, lifestyle, physical activity, quality of life, survivorship

1. INTRODUCTION

Since the 1990s, a 6-month course of adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with resected high-risk stage ii or iii colon cancer ¹. Despite recent advances in adjuvant therapy, a substantial proportion of such patients still experience disease relapse and premature death ². Recently published observational data suggest that physical activity (pa) is associated with a reduced risk of disease relapse and premature death in these colon cancer survivors.

In 2006, Meyerhardt et al. ³ reported results of a prospective observational study of 832 patients with stage iii colon cancer enrolled in a randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial and followed for a median of 3.8 years from trial entry. In that trial, pa was self-reported approximately 6 months after completion of chemotherapy and was quantified as weekly metabolic equivalent task (met)–hours (for example, walking briskly is approximately 4.0 mets). Categories of pa were predefined in terms of these met–hours: fewer than 3 (referent), 3–8.9, 9–17.9, 18–26.9, and more than 27. Analyses adjusted for known prognostic factors, including body mass index (bmi), indicated that higher levels of pa were associated with superior disease-free (dfs), recurrence-free, and overall survival. The 3-year dfs was 75.1% in patients who exercised for fewer than 18 met–hours weekly as compared with 84.5% in patients who exercised for more than 18 met–hours weekly [hazard ratio (hr): 0.57; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.39 to 0.85].

In a second article, Meyerhardt et al. ⁴ reported results of a prospective observational study of 573 women from the Nurses’ Health Study diagnosed with stages i–iii colorectal cancer. Self-reported leisure-time pa before diagnosis and 1–4 years post-diagnosis was assessed, and analyses were again adjusted for known prognostic factors, including bmi. An inverse relationship was observed between the amount of pa post-diagnosis and the risk of both colorectal cancer–specific and overall mortality. Specifically, as compared with women exercising for fewer than 3 met–hours weekly, the risk of colorectal cancer–specific mortality declined in successive groups performing more exercise: the hr was 0.92 (95% ci: 0.50 to 1.69) in the 3–8.9 met–hours weekly group, 0.57 (95% ci: 0.27 to 1.20) in the 9–17.9 met–hours weekly group, and 0.39 (95% ci: 0.18 to 0.82) in the more than 18 met–hours weekly group. Risk of overall mortality was similarly reduced. Furthermore, change in pa from pre- to post-diagnosis was also predictive of outcome. Compared with women who did not change their pa, women who increased their pa by at least 1 predefined met category—for example, from fewer than 3 met–hours to 3–8.9 met–hours—between their pre-diagnostic and post-treatment assessments experienced improved outcomes; women whose exercise levels decreased by at least 1 predefined met category had poorer outcomes. Further analysis of these data suggested that no additional benefit accrued with an increase in pa post-diagnosis in women who were already achieving at least 9 met–hours weekly before diagnosis (that is, those who were roughly already meeting current public health guidelines).

Several plausible biologic mechanisms could account for an association between pa and colon cancer outcomes, including metabolic consequences of obesity; decreased gastrointestinal transit time; decreased levels of insulin, insulin-like growth factors, and pros-taglandin ratios; lowered bile acid secretion; and altered gut flora ⁵. Moreover, there is evidence that colon cancer survivors experience significant declines in pa during adjuvant therapy ⁶ and that they report among the lowest pa participation rates of any cancer survivor group ⁷, suggesting that, in the current pa levels of colon cancer survivors, there is considerable room for improvement from a public health perspective. Finally, progress has been made in the science of health behaviour change over the past decade demonstrating that pa can, indeed, be increased substantially and maintained over extended periods of time with an appropriate behavioural support program ⁸^–¹⁰. Together, these observations suggest that interventions to increase pa in colon cancer survivors may improve disease outcomes, that associated correlative biologic studies may provide insights into the mechanisms of colon cancer pathogenesis, and that sufficient understanding exists to implement an effective intervention.

Despite the highly suggestive observational findings, a randomized controlled trial (rct) is needed to establish unequivocally the causal nature of this association and to inform policies for health care delivery. The primary objective of the Colon Health and LifeLong Exercise Change (challenge) trial co.21 being undertaken by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (ncic ctg) is to determine the effects of a 3-year structured pa intervention on dfs in survivors of high-risk stage ii or iii colon cancer who have completed adjuvant chemotherapy in the preceding 2–6 months and who are insufficiently active. Secondary objectives are to

determine the effects of the pa intervention on important secondary endpoints including overall survival, multiple patient-reported outcomes (pros), and objective physical functioning.
identify the determinants of long-term pa adherence in the intervention arm.
explore the associations between selected molecular markers and study endpoint measures.
provide an economic evaluation of the pa intervention.

We hypothesize that colon cancer survivors randomized to the pa intervention arm will experience improvements in dfs, pros, and objective physical functioning as compared with survivors allocated to general health education.

2. METHODS

2.1 Study Design and Participants

We will be conducting a multinational, multicentre, phase iii trial with randomization to a pa intervention versus general health education materials. This study will be led by the ncic ctg and will include collaboration with the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Figure 1 presents the anticipated flow of participants through the trial. Medically-fit survivors of high-risk stage ii or iii colon cancer who have received their last dose of adjuvant chemotherapy within the preceding 60–180 days will be recruited. This group has been identified as being at high risk for disease recurrence or death, being most likely to adhere to the intervention, and being individuals for whom the pa intervention is safe. Table I details the eligibility criteria.

FIGURE 1

Flow of participants through the Colon Health and Life-Long Exercise Change (CHALLENGE) trial.

TABLE I

Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the challenge trial

Pre-registration evaluations will focus on current pa involvement and medical eligibility for study participation. Patients who are already meeting current public health guidelines for pa (150 minutes or more of moderate-to-vigorous or 75 minutes or more of vigorous pa weekly), as estimated for the month before registration using the Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire, will be ineligible. Consenting patients will be registered and will then undergo submaximal exercise testing to ensure that they are able to exercise safely at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity. Provided that 2 stages of the treadmill test are completed with acceptable heart rate and blood pressure responses, patients will then complete the remaining baseline investigations, including a physical functioning test, anthropometric testing, blood collection for correlative studies, pros, pa behaviour and determinants, health utility, and a health economics work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (wpai). Patients will then be stratified by centre, disease stage (high-risk ii vs. iii), bmi (≤27.5 vs. >27.5), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs. 1), and will be randomized to receive the pa intervention program (intervention arm) or general health education materials (comparison arm).

2.2 Physical Activity Intervention

Participants in both arms will be provided with general health education materials including information about nutrition and pa. Participants in both groups will also receive follow-up care at the participating cancer centre, including regular physician visits, imaging, blood work, and colonoscopy. Participants assigned to the pa intervention will receive a structured 3-year pa program delivered by a local pa consultant (pac). The goal for the pa intervention group is to increase recreational pa from baseline by at least 10 met–hours weekly to a maximum of 27 met–hours weekly. The 10 met–hours weekly is roughly equivalent to the current public health guidelines of about 2.5 hours (for example, 5 days of 30 minutes daily) of moderate-intensity pa weekly, such as brisk walking (4 mets), or 1.25 hours (for example, 3 days of 25 minutes daily) of vigorous-intensity pa weekly such as jogging (8 mets). At the end of 6 months, a decision to encourage participants to increase pa by more than 10 met–hours weekly will be determined and will depend on their adaptation to the initial goal of an increase of 10 met–hours weekly. Patients will not be encouraged to increase their pa beyond 27 met–hours weekly, which is equivalent to about 1 hour daily of brisk walking for 7 days each week or 1 hour daily of jogging for 3.5 days each week.

Achieving an increase in pa from baseline of at least 10 met–hours weekly will require a significant amount of behaviour support. Participants in the intervention arm will therefore receive an intensive behaviour support program based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour ¹¹ and modelled after the successful behavioural change program in the Diabetes Prevention Program ¹⁰ and the Look ahead trial ⁸. The pa intervention will be delivered in 3 distinct phases and will consist of behaviour support sessions and supervised pa sessions (Table II). The intervention will include a personalized pa prescription that accounts for the individual’s baseline fitness test results, pa history, performance status, personal preferences, and individual barriers to activity.

TABLE II

Physical activity program intervention

2.3 Behaviour Support Sessions

Behaviour support sessions will include training in behavioural strategies to promote the adoption and long-term maintenance of pa. Key behavioural strategies will include an emphasis on the unique benefits of pa for colon cancer survivors; strategies for making pa enjoyable, for overcoming barriers, for securing social support from family and friends, and for identifying environmental opportunities; and time management, self-monitoring, goal setting, planning, stimulus control, and self-reinforcement. At the core of the behavioural intervention will be a pa guidebook that will contain topics and materials that the pacs can use to reinforce and expand on during counselling sessions. The guidebook, called Step Up to the Challenge!, will be distributed to each pa intervention participant as an ongoing resource. It is modeled after a guidebook originally developed for breast cancer survivors and has been shown to be effective for increasing motivation, pa, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors ¹²^–¹⁴. Throughout all phases of the study, pacs are able to provide additional behaviour support sessions if they determine that a patient is experiencing difficulty with adherence.

Advanced behavioural strategies will be considered for patients who have significant struggles in adopting or maintaining pa despite continued support from the pac. A behavioural toolbox will assist in overcoming barriers to pa, many of which will likely be related to issues of opportunity to perform exercise in the winter. The primary approach will be to have a facility available free of charge year round at each centre. All patients will also be provided with pedometers to motivate them and to help them track their pa.

2.4 Supervised Physical Activity Sessions

In addition to counselling sessions focusing on behaviour support, patients will also receive supervised pa sessions. These sessions will be combined with behaviour support sessions and will also occur independently. Their focus will be to teach proper pa technique and how to monitor intensity and to progress pa safely and effectively. In the first 6 months, these mandatory sessions will be supervised by the pac. Thereafter, supervision is strongly recommended. The supervision may be 1:1 with the pac or in a group format. Throughout all phases of the study, pacs will be able to provide additional supervised pa sessions if they determine that a patient is experiencing difficulties with adherence. Patients will be provided free access to a fitness facility at times outside of their supervised pa sessions.

2.5 Primary and Secondary Endpoints

Table III presents the nature and timing of the study evaluations. The primary endpoint is dfs, because available data demonstrate that 3-year dfs is highly correlated with overall survival in patients with resected colon cancer ¹⁵. This endpoint is now accepted for registration of trials by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Secondary endpoints will include overall survival, pros assessing quality of life [the Short Form (sf-36) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, General subscale], fatigue (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, Fatigue subscale), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), and anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and objective testing of physical functioning consisting of anthropometric measurements, cardiovascular fitness (submaximal exercise test using the Balke treadmill protocol ¹⁶); and physical functioning (Seniors Fitness Test ¹⁷). Adherence to pa will be assessed at baseline and every 6–12 months by using a slight modification of the Past Year Total Physical Activity Questionnaire ¹⁸^,¹⁹. The Past Year Total Physical Activity Questionnaire has been shown to have acceptable reliability and validity for measurement of past-year pa ¹⁹. Correlative biologic markers will include blood measures of insulin, insulin-like growth factors, and selected cytokines. Finally, an economic evaluation will be performed to assess cost-effectiveness and cost–utility of the pa intervention. Patient utilities will be measured using the sf-6D, which is derived from the sf-36 quality-of-life measure ²⁰ that has been validated in population surveys and clinical trials settings. Resource utilization and wpai will be collected prospectively as part of the economic analysis.

TABLE III

Study evaluations

2.6 Statistical Considerations

The analysis will be performed using the intent-to-treat principle and is powered to detect a hr of 0.75 for dfs between patients randomized to two treatment arms. To detect such a hr with a power of 80% and a two-tailed alpha of 0.05, we will need to observe 380 events during follow-up. It is anticipated that a total of 962 patients will be randomized over 3 years. To observe 380 events, we assume that the patients in the comparison group will have a 3-year dfs of 75% and will not materially change their pa behaviour from baseline. It is also assumed that 20% of patients randomized to the intervention group will not adhere to their pa program. With these assumptions, it is estimated that, to observe 380 events among 962 patients randomized, 4.7 years of additional follow-up after the last patient is randomized will be required, which leads to an approximate total study duration of 7.7 years. Four interim analyses will be performed: the first analysis will assess the feasibility of accrual principles, the second will assess the feasibility of the pa behaviour change, and the final two will assess for unexpectedly large magnitudes of benefit or futility.

2.7 Trial Management

The development and oversight of the co.21 trial is provided by the Trial Steering Committee, which includes the study chairs and the Design and Conduct Committee members; the coordinators for Quality of Life, Economic Evaluations, and Correlative Sciences committees; and the ncic ctg central office physician coordinator, senior biostatistician, and study coordinator. Because of the complexities of delivering a lifestyle intervention and because of the uniqueness of this study, four working groups were established to provide expertise in protocol development and trial implementation in four key areas: pa, pros, health economics, and correlative studies. Each of these working groups is chaired by a member of the Trial Steering Committee with expertise in the respective field. A PA Working Group will provide oversight to the pa and behaviour support components of the study, including monitoring of adherence. This working group is led by the study chair.

3. DISCUSSION

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Canadian men and women and the second leading cause of cancer-related death ²¹. There are more than 110,000 colorectal cancer survivors in Canada. This growing number of survivors has generated interest in behaviour and lifestyle interventions that might further improve disease outcomes and quality of life. In colon cancer, pa has been strongly associated with improved disease outcomes, and there are plausible biologic mechanisms for this association. However, the data published to date have been observational. Moreover, few colon cancer survivors currently exercise, partly because of the physical and psychological effects of their disease and treatments, and partly because of the lack of guidance and support from cancer care organizations. However, recent progress in behavioural change suggests that, with appropriate support, such populations can be motivated to adopt long-term lifestyle changes. Consequently, all the necessary evidence, rationale, and justification exist to warrant the conduct of an rct of pa and disease outcomes in colon cancer survivors.

Moreover, in the era of molecularly targeted anti-cancer therapy, funding of new and expensive agents is becoming increasingly difficult. Should a pa intervention be found to have a significant clinical benefit in colon cancer patients, this type of intervention could be a very cost-effective therapy, with the potential for many other non-cancer-related health benefits. The magnitude of the associations between pa and disease outcomes in the observational studies of colon cancer compares favourably with the benefit observed with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, but would likely involve lower toxicity and cost. Importantly, the cost-effectiveness of this pa intervention will be prospectively evaluated as part of this clinical trial, because all interventions are recognized to have a cost component that needs to be considered when evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention to reduce the burden of a disease at a population level.

Positive findings from the challenge trial would support a new and additional paradigm to be tested in patients with other forms of cancer and would enhance interest in applying these results to test strategies for cancer prevention. One of the greatest challenges to implementing pa programs in any population has been ensuring adequate support and resources to promote behaviour change with regard to pa. Cancer patients are, in general, a sedentary but motivated population. Previous work has suggested good adherence and a willingness to pursue lifestyle modifications following a diagnosis of cancer. If this rct is able to demonstrate a significant benefit in dfs, that finding would provide an impetus to patients to participate in pa and to oncologists and cancer care organizations to promote pa. It could also potentially lead to changes in public perception that might influence the policies by which pa experts are utilized within the health care system. The challenge trial will also have an opportunity to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of potential policy recommendations.

4. CONCLUSIONS

In various populations, both healthy and with a disease, pa has been associated with numerous health benefits. As yet, no conclusive evidence has been found that pa will reduce the likelihood of colon cancer recurrence or will extend survival. Our study has the potential to answer this question definitively and will provide valuable insights into this association regardless of the final results of the trial. In addition, the study will obtain robust data about the effect of pa on important secondary endpoints in colon cancer survivors including quality of life, fatigue, mood, biologic correlative measures, and cost-effectiveness.

Acknowledgments

5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The ctg is funded by the ncic with funds received from the Canadian Cancer Society. The Australian component of the study has received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. KSC is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program. CMB is supported as a Cancer Care Ontario Chair in Health Services Research. CMF is supported by a Health Senior Scholar Award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. JV is supported by the Cancer Institute NSW. The authors gratefully acknowledge Nicole Mittmann, Jackson Wu, and members of the Working Group on Economic Analysis of the ncic ctg for input into economic aspects of protocol design, and Dr. Hidde van der Ploeg, University of Sydney, for major input into the Australian grants.

6. REFERENCES

1. nih Consensus Conference. Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer. JAMA. 1990;264:1444–50. [PubMed]

2. André T, Boni C, Mounedji–Boudiaf L, et al. on behalf of the mosaic Investigators. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2343–51. [PubMed]

3. Meyerhardt JA, Heseltine D, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of physical activity on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage iii colon cancer: findings from calgb 89803. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3535–41. [PubMed]

4. Meyerhardt JA, Giovannucci EL, Holmes MD, et al. Physical activity and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3527–34. [PubMed]

5. McTiernan A. Mechanisms linking physical activity with cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:205–11. [PubMed]

6. Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM. Relationship between exercise pattern across the cancer experience and current quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. J Altern Complement Med. 1997;3:215–26. [PubMed]

7. Courneya KS, Katzmarzyk PT, Bacon E. Physical activity and obesity in Canadian cancer survivors: population-based estimates from the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey. Cancer. 2008;112:2475–82. [PubMed]

8. Look ahead Research Group. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the Look ahead trial. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1374–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

9. McTiernan A, Yasui Y, Sorensen B, et al. Effect of a 12-month exercise intervention on patterns of cellular proliferation in colonic crypts: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1588–97. [PubMed]

10. Knowler WC, Barrett–Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. on behalf of the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

11. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.

12. Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Dinu I, Mackey JR. Maintenance of physical activity in breast cancer survivors after a randomized trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:173–80. [PubMed]

13. Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff R, Mackay JR. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of print materials and step pedometers on physical activity and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2352–9. [PubMed]

14. Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Mackey JR. Analyzing theoretical mechanisms of physical activity behavior change in breast cancer survivors: results from the activity promotion (action) trial. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35:150–8. [PubMed]

15. Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Haller DG, et al. Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8664–70. [See comment in J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8564–5] [PubMed]

16. American College of Sports Medicine (acsm) acsm’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 7. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006.

17. Rikli R, Jones J. Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 1999;7:129–61.

18. Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Bryant HE. The Lifetime Total Physical Activity Questionnaire: development and reliability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:266–74. [PubMed]

19. Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Neilson HK, et al. Reliability and validity of the Past Year Total Physical Activity Questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:959–70. [PubMed]

20. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the sf-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271–92. [PubMed]

21. Canadian Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2008. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society; 2008.

Articles from Current Oncology are provided here courtesy of
Multimed Inc.