PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of straninfSexually Transmitted InfectionsVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 April; 83(2): 130–132.
Published online 2006 June 21. doi:  10.1136/sti.2006.020941
PMCID: PMC2598609

Lack of evidence for the involvement of rectal and oral trichomonads in the aetiology of vaginal trichomoniasis in Ghana

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the possible involvement of human trichomonads (Pentatrichomonas hominis and Trichomonas tenax) other than Trichomonas vaginalis in the aetiology of vaginal trichomoniasis.

Methods

Vaginal swabs taken from women attending antenatal clinics were tested for Trichomonas vaginalis by traditional assays (wet‐mount microscopy and InPouch culture) and nucleic acid amplification (polymerase chain reaction). These swabs were also tested for the presence of P hominis and T tenax by nucleic acid amplification. Oral and rectal swabs from these women were tested for T tenax and P hominis respectively. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, sexual and anogenital hygiene practices likely to seed P hominis and T tenax into the vagina were collected by a questionnaire.

Results

93% (161) of the 173 samples in which T vaginalis was detected by wet preparation or culture was evaluable by PCR. Of this, T vaginalis was detected in 94% (152) by T vaginalis‐specific PCR. Neither P hominis nor T tenax was detected in any of the vaginal swab samples. These included nine samples for which T vaginalis had been detected by wet preparation or culture, but were negative by T vaginalis nucleic acid amplification. P hominis and T tenax were not detected in any of the rectal and oral swabs, respectively.

Conclusion

In this group of women, there was no evidence for the involvement of trichomonads other than T vaginalis in the aetiology of vaginal trichomoniasis.

The causative agent of vaginal trichomoniasis is the flagellated protozoon parasite Trichomonasvaginalis. Evidence for this has come from epidemiological, laboratory and clinical studies conducted in the 1930s and 1940s.1,2,3,4 The main diagnostic criterion used was the morphologically based wet preparation direct microscopy (wet prep), reported by Donné5 in 1836. Two other trichomonads (Pentatrichomonas hominis and Trichomonas tenax) are morphologically identical with T vaginalis at microscopy, and some investigators have expressed caution at delineating all trichomonads found in the vagina as T vaginalis. P hominis is a commensal in the gut and T tenax is a commensal in the oral cavity. Walton and Bacharach6 and Hersh7 reporting on this diagnostic dilemma commented that morphological differentiation between the three trichomonads was difficult and that earlier investigators gave no reliable differentiation between them. This notwithstanding, Honigberg8 and Wenrich9 stated that these three species of trichomonads have distinct habitats and will not survive outside them.

Recent epidemiological and clinical studies have suggested the possible involvement of human trichomonads other than T vaginalis in the aetiology of vaginal trichomoniasis. Buvé et al10 reported finding T vaginalis by microscopy in 40% of adolescent girls in Zambia, many of whom denied ever having sexual intercourse. The plausibility of finding P hominis in the vagina has been highlighted by a recent report detecting two cases in vaginal swabs using nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAAT).11 Lurie and Glezerman12 postulated that short anovaginal distances could influence conditions that promote microbial colonisation of the vagina. This was after they had isolated considerably more gut‐related microbes (including Trichomonad sp—they did not mention which species) from the vagina of women with recurrent vaginitis than from controls.

In this study, we look at the possible involvement of P hominis and T tenax in the aetiology of vaginal trichomoniasis. Traditional trichomonad diagnostic tests were supplemented by NAAT that make trichomonad species differentiation possible.

The involvement of trichomonads other than T vaginalis in the aetiology of vaginal trichomoniasis could have implications for the control of vaginal trichomoniasis, as P hominis and T tenax have their reservoirs outside the urogenital tract.

Methods

Details of the study population have been published previously.13 Briefly, pregnant women attending antenatal care at four public hospitals in the Kumasi metropolis of Ghana between October 2002 and August 2003 participated in the study. Women consenting to participate in the study collected self‐administered vaginal swabs that were tested for T vaginalis infection using a T vaginalis latex agglutination test (Kalon Biological, UK) All those testing positive and the next two consecutive patients testing negative were enrolled into the study. Vaginal examinations were carried out on these enrolled women, during which a nurse obtained three vaginal swabs from the posterior fornix after passage of a speculum. The swabs were tested for T vaginalis infection by wet preparation microscopy and culture. Women testing positive by either of these tests were enrolled as study cases, and those testing negative were controls. The participants answered a questionnaire seeking information on sociodemographic characteristics, sexual practices (including oral and rectal intercourse) and anogenital hygiene. Oral and rectal swabs were also collected by the nurses. Univariate analysis of associations between T vaginalis infection as determined by T vaginalis traditional testing (wet‐mount microscopy and culture) and factors likely to transmit rectal and oral trichomonads into the vagina were determined by odds ratios and χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. These factors included oral sex, rectal intercourse followed by vaginal penetration, poor anogenital hygiene with faecal staining of the perineum and practices of anogenital hygiene, including douching, and the direction of cleaning after defecation, postulating that cleaning forwards from the anus towards the vagina could introduce rectal trichomonads into the vagina.

The first vaginal swab was tested for T vaginalis by wet‐mount microscopy, the second by culture with InPouch Tv (Biomed Diagnostics, San Jose, California, USA) and the third by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for T vaginalis.

For the direct microscopy, the vaginal swab was immediately agitated into 0.9% saline solution. A drop of this was placed on the centre of a clean microscope slide and covered with a coverslip. The slide was initially carefully scanned at ×100 with a light microscope for motile trichomonads, pus cells, yeast cells and epithelial cells, and then at ×400 to confirm motility, flagella movement and morphological features of T vaginalis.

InPouch culture was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions.14 Pouches not registering the growth of trichomonads after the fifth day were declared negative.

Before specific PCR analysis, a check was carried out on the adequacy or quality of vaginal, oral and rectal swab sampling. Human β‐2 microglobulin gene amplification15 was carried out on the vaginal and oral swab eluates. Samples in which β‐2 microglobulin gene sequences could not be amplified after a neat or a 1:10 dilution were considered to have PCR inhibitors or to have been poorly collected. The quality of rectal swab sampling was determined by the amplification of Escherichia coli sequences.16E coli, a commensal of the gut, is universally present in faecal material.

Two PCR assays amplifying different sequences of T vaginalis were used for the detection of T vaginalis. All vaginal swabs were screened with the primer set described by Kengne et al.17 Confirmation of T vaginalis‐positive results was carried out using the inner primer set designed by Shaio et al.18 Overall cycling and testing conditions are described by Crucitti et al.19 A specimen was considered positive for T vaginalis if both PCR assays amplified the T vaginalis target. The vaginal swab eluates on which T vaginalis PCR was performed were also tested for P hominis and T tenax using specific rRNA PCR primer sets.11,20 PCRs for P hominis and T tenax on the rectal and oral swabs, respectively, were carried out using the same primers and cycling conditions as used on the vaginal swab eluates. Table 11 shows the trichomonad primer sequences used in the study.

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Primer sequences used for Trichomonas spp

T vaginalis wet‐mount microscopy and InPouch culture were carried out at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana, and the swabs for PCR testing were stored at −20°C until shipment on dry ice to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK, and the Institute for Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. PCR testing of vaginal swabs for T vaginalis, P hominis and T tenax were performed in London, whereas PCR of rectal swabs for P hominis and oral swabs for T tenax were performed in Antwerp. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Committeee on Human Research Ethics and Publication of the School of Medical Sciences, Kumasi, Ghana, and the Research Ethics Committee, LSHTM.

Results

Samples from 3807 women were tested for T vaginalis infection by latex agglutination, of which 633 (206 positive, 427 negative) were tested for T vaginalis by other tests as per protocol. A total of 173 of the 206 women tested positive by the expanded gold standard wet‐mount microscopy or InPouch culture and were enrolled as cases, and all the 427 latex negatives tested negative and were analysed as controls. Participants with discordant latex and expanded gold standard test results were not analysed in the case–control study. The prevalence of T vaginalis was 4.9% by the morphologically based expanded gold standard of culture or wet preparation.

The participants were aged 15–44 years, with a median age of 26 years. On univariate and age‐adjusted analysis, T vaginalis infection was significantly associated with young age (<20 years; odds ratio (OR) 3.73, 95% CI 2.0 to 7.0, p = 0.0001), being single (OR 3.18, 95% CI 2.0 to 8.4, p = 0.03) and being of neither Akan nor northern ethnicity (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.6, p = 0.005). Poor anogenital hygiene practices and the sexual practices studied were not associated with infection.

Of the 173 samples from which T vaginalis was identified by wet mount or culture, 93% (161) were evaluable by PCR. β‐2 microglobulin gene sequences could not be detected in the other 12 samples, which were thus declared to have PCR assay inhibitors or to have been poorly collected. A total of 94% (152) of the 161 samples were also positive by T vaginalis PCR. β‐2 microglobulin and E coli sequences were detected in all oral swab and rectal swab eluates, respectively.

P hominis and T tenax were not detected by PCR in any of the vaginal swab eluates. This included the nine samples for which T vaginalis PCR was negative, although trichomonads were detected by wet preparation or culture. PCR for P hominis and T tenax were negative in all the 600 rectal and oral swab samples, respectively.

Discussion

Debate on the involvement of rectal trichomonads in the aetiology of vaginal trichomoniasis seemed to have been resolved in the 1930s and 1940s, with studies on cross infection and laboratory studies during which trichomonads inoculated outside their traditional habitats did not survive. These studies reported that trichomonads were site specific and could not survive outside their traditional habitats.1,2,3,4,8,9 However, recent reports on the presence of trichomonads in non‐traditional sites, with the use of molecular diagnostic methods, indicate otherwise.21,22,23,24

The difficulty in morphological differentiation of trichomonads has also been highlighted in veterinary medical practice. Romatowski25 initially reported isolating P hominis from the gut of kittens. Later, Levy et al26 reported that these flagellates had been misdiagnosed, and that gene sequencing had identified the isolates as Tritrichomonas foetus. The practice of culling bulls with positive preputial cultures for the sexually transmitted pathogen Tritrichomonas foetus for economic reasons (causes infertility in herds of virgin bulls) has been questioned. Until recently, the diagnosis of T foetus preputial infection had been by microscopic examination and culture of preputial scrapings or washings. Using a combination of culture and PCR assays using T foetus‐specific primers and pan‐trichomonad primers, workers have observed the existence of easily misidentified non‐T foetus trichomonads (most of which originate from the gut) in the bovine prepuce. They recommend that culture of preputial scrapings or washings should be augmented with specific PCR assays in confirming infection.27,28

In the population of pregnant women studied, we found no evidence for the involvement of rectal or oral trichomonads in cases of vaginal trichomoniasis using NAAT. A total of 94% of cases for which T vaginalis was detected by traditional methods (wet preparation or culture) were confirmed by T vaginalis‐specific PCR assays. T vaginalis could not be detected by PCR in nine samples in which morphological identification was positive. All nine samples were concordant negative on the two T vaginalis PCR assays. Neither P hominis nor T tenax were found in these nine samples by specific PCR assays. This result could mean false‐positive morphological T vaginalis diagnosis, poor specimen preparation or genetic variation of T vaginalis. Genetic variation of T vaginalis is likely to be the case, as the samples were both wet preparation and culture positive, and did not have any PCR inhibitors—that is, they were positive for β‐2 microglobulin. Furthermore, Crucitti et al19 and Pillay et al29 have recently shown that the sensitivity of different PCR assays for the detection of T vaginalis infection varies.

P hominis, a gut commensal, has normally been reported in children from areas with poor hygiene. It is not surprising that none was detected in the study population because they were adult women. Similarly, P hominis was detected in stool samples from 112 adults in Belgium who had spent various lengths of time in the tropics.11T tenax has been reported especially in diseased mouths, which was not evident in the population of women studied.

The study also looked at various behavioural factors (sexual practices, anogenital hygiene and practices) that could seed P hominis and T tenax into the vagina. None of these was associated with T vaginalis infection.

Briefly, with the use of a combination of traditional and molecular diagnostic tests for trichomonads, no evidence for the involvement of trichomonads other than T vaginalis in the aetiology of vaginal trichomoniasis was found in this population with low prevalence of T vaginalis.

Acknowledgements

Scientific and technical support in the laboratory was given by Frank Tete‐Donkor and Robert Lartey from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana, Aura Aguirre‐Andreasen and Sandra Molina from the LSHTM, Said Abdellati, and Bénédicte De Deken from the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp.

Abbreviations

LSHTM - London School Of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

NAAT - nucleic acid amplification tehniques

PCR - polymerase chain reaction

Footnotes

Funding: The funding for this study was obtained from the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) Sexually Transmitted Infections/HIV Knowledge Programme.

Competing interests: None.

Ethical approval: Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Committee on Human Research Ethics and Publication of the School of Medical Sciences, Kumasi, Ghana, and the Research Ethics Committee of the LSHTM.

References

1. Stabler R M, Feo L G, Rakoff A E. Implantation of intestinal trichomonads (T. hominis) into the human vagina. Am J Hyg 1941. 34114–118.118
2. Bonestell A E. Inoculation experiments with Trichomonas hominis, T. buccalis and T. vaginalis. J Parasitol 1936. 22511–512.512
3. Feo L G, Rakoff A E, Stabler R M. Inoculation of intestinal and vaginal trichomonads into the human vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1941. 42276–280.280
4. Stabler R M, Feo L G. Survival time of intravaginally implanted Trichomonas hominis. Am J Trop Med 1942. 633–637.637
5. Donné M A. Animacules observes dans les matières purulentes et le produit des secretions des organes genitaux de l'hommes et de la femme. C R Acad Sci 1836. 3385–386.386
6. Walton B C, Bacharach T. Occurrence of Trichomonads in the respiratory tract: report of 3 cases. J Parasitol 1963. 4935–38.38 [PubMed]
7. Hersh S M. Pulmonary trichomoniais and Trichomonas tenax. J Med Microbiol 1985. 201–10.10 [PubMed]
8. Honigberg B M. Evolutionary and systemic relationships in the flagellate order Trichomonadida. J Protozool 1963. 1020–63.63 [PubMed]
9. Wenrich D H. The species of trichomonas in man. J Parasitol 1947. 33177–178.178 [PubMed]
10. Buvé A, Weiss H A, Laga M. et al The epidemiology of trichomoniasis in women in four African cities. AIDS 2001. 15(Suppl 4)S89–S96.S96 [PubMed]
11. Crucitti T, Abdellati S, Ross D A. et al Detection of Pentatrichomonas hominis DNA in biological specimens by PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol 2004. 38510–516.516 [PubMed]
12. Lurie S I, Glezerman M. Short anovaginal distance: a risk factor for recurrent vaginitis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000. 71279–280.280 [PubMed]
13. Adu‐Sarkodie Y, Opoku B K, Danso K A. et al Comparison of latex agglutination, wet preparation, and culture for the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis. Sex Transm Infect 2004. 80201–203.203 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Borchardt K A, Smith R F. An evaluation of an InPouch TV culture method for diagnosing Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Genitourin Med 1991. 67149–152.152 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Coutlée F, de Laduranteye M, Tremblay C. et al An important proportion of genital samples submitted for Chlamydia trachomatis detection by PCR contain small amounts of cellular DNA as measured by β‐globulin gene amplification. J Clin Microbiol 2000. 82512–2515.2515 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Sabat G, Rose P, Hickey W J. et al Selective and sensitive method for PCR amplification of Escherichia coli 16s rRNA genes in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000. 66844–849.849 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Kengne P, Veas F, Vidal N. et alTrichomonas vaginalis; repeated DNA targets for highly sensitive and specific polymerase chain reaction diagnosis. Cell Mol Biol 1994. 40819–831.831 [PubMed]
18. Shaio M ‐ F, Lin P ‐ R, Liu J ‐ Y. Colorimetric one tube nested PCR for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in vaginal discharges. J Clin Microbiol 1997. 35132–138.138 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Crucitti T, Van Dyck E, Tehe A. et al Comparison of culture and different PCR assays for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in self collected vaginal swab specimens. Sex Transm Infect 2003. 79393–398.398 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Kikuta N, Yamamoto K, Fukura K. et al Specific and sensitive detection of Trichomonas tenax by the polymerase chain reaction. Lett Appl Microbiol 1997. 24193–197.197 [PubMed]
21. Press N, Chavez V M, Ticona E. et al Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in human immunodeficiency virus – positive patients in Peru reveals an absence of Chlamydia trachomatis and identifies Trichomonas vaginalis in pharyngeal secretions. Clin Infect Dis 2001. 32808–814.814 [PubMed]
22. Jongwutives S, Silachamroon U, Putaporntip C. Pentatrichomonas hominis in empyema thoracis. Trans Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000. 94185–186.186 [PubMed]
23. Duboucher C, Noel C, Durrand ‐Jolly I. et al Pulmonary co‐infection by Trichomonas vaginalis and Pneumocystis sp as a novel manifestation of AIDS. Hum Pathol 2003. 34(5)508–11 [PubMed]
24. Duboucher C V, Farto‐Benasson F, Cheron M. et al Lymph node infection by Trichomonas tenax. Report of a case with co‐infection by mycobacterium tuberculosis. Hum Pathol 2000. 311317–1321.1321 [PubMed]
25. Romatowsky J. Pentatrichomonas hominis infection in four kittens. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000. 2161270–1272.1272 [PubMed]
26. Levy M G, Gookin J L, Poore M. et alTritrochomonas foetus and not Pentatrichomonas hominis is the aetiologic agent of feline trichomonal diarrhoea. J Parasitol 2003. 8999–104.104 [PubMed]
27. Campero C M, Rodriguez D C, Bolondi A. et al Two step (culture and PCR) diagnostic approach for differentiation of non‐T. foetus trichomonads from genitalia of virgin bulls in Argentina. Vet Parasitol 2003. 112167–175.175 [PubMed]
28. Parker S, Campbell J, McIntosh K. et al Diagnosis of trichomoniasis in ‘virgin' bulls by culture and polymerase chain reaction. Can Vet J 2003. 44732–734.734 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Pillay A, Lewis J, Ballard R C. Evaluation of Xenostrip‐Tv, a rapid diagnostic test for Trichomonas vaginalis infection. J Clin Microbiol 2004. 423853–3856.3856 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group