Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of injprevInjury PreventionVisit this articleVisit this journalSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Inj Prev. 2007 December; 13(6): 416–421.
PMCID: PMC2598289

Cost of injuries from a prospective cohort study of North Carolina high school athletes



To estimate the economic cost of injuries in a population of US high school varsity athletes.

Design and Setting

The North Carolina High School Athletic Injury Study, conducted from 1996 to 1999, was a prospective cohort study of injury incidence and severity. A two‐stage cluster sampling technique was used to select athletic teams from 100 high schools in North Carolina. An injury cost model was used to estimate the economic cost of injury.


Varsity athletes from 12 sports: football, girls' and boy's soccer, girls' and boys' track, girls' and boy's basketball, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, and cheerleading.

Main outcome measures

Descriptive data were collected at the time of injury. Three types of costs were estimated: medical, human capital (medical costs plus loss of future earnings), and comprehensive (human capital costs plus lost quality of life).


The annual statewide estimates were $9.9 million in medical costs, $44.7 million in human capital costs, and $144.6 million in comprehensive costs. The mean medical cost was $709 per injury (95% CI $542 to $927), $2223 per injury (95% CI $1709 to $2893) in human capital costs, and $10 432 per injury (95% CI $8062 to $13 449) in comprehensive costs. Sport and competition division were significant predictors of injury costs.


Injuries among high school athletes represent a significant economic cost to society. Further research should estimate costs in additional populations to begin to develop cost‐effective sports injury prevention programs.

Despite the health benefits of sports participation, injury is a detrimental consequence and an important public health problem. Van Mechelen and others proposed a comprehensive approach to sports injury severity that emphasized economic cost as one of six severity markers, along with nature of the injury, level of medical care, time lost from sports participation, working time lost, and permanent disability.1,2,3,4 Economic cost is based on the conversion of the other five markers into an economic estimate. To date, the majority of the sports injury literature in the USA has not addressed the costs associated with sports injuries in a comprehensive manner. Instead, the sports injury literature has generally described injury severity using different definitions based on the nature of the injury and the length of recovery time.5,6,7,8,9,10 Using these methods, most high school sports injuries have been considered relatively minor and non‐permanent5,6,7,8,9,10,11; however, large costs, including treatment and rehabilitation, may be associated with managing these apparently “minor” injuries.

Prior research has emphasized that interventions such as bicycle helmets and child safety seats are cost‐effective because of the high cost of childhood injury.12,13 Increased knowledge about the cost of sports injuries can similarly help to target limited resources toward preventing those injuries that are most costly to society. The primary purpose of this analysis was to describe the cost of injuries in a population of high school varsity athletes.


Sample selection

Data for this paper came from the North Carolina High School Athletic Injury Study (NCHSAIS), a prospective cohort study conducted from 1996 to 1999. An extensive description of the study methods has been published.14 Briefly, participants were approximately 5013 varsity athletes per school year representing 12 different sports in 100 public high schools in North Carolina: boys' and girls' soccer, boys' and girls' track, boys' and girls' basketball, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, cheerleading, and football.

The sample was selected using a stratified two‐stage probability proportional‐to‐size cluster sampling technique.14,15 The sample was stratified by presence of a certified athletic trainer, competition division, geographic region, and average school attendance.14

Aggregate estimates and sample weights

Sample weights were constructed to produce aggregate statewide estimates by multiplying the product of the inverse probabilities of selection in the two stages by the response rates at the school, sport, and athlete levels.14 Normalized weights (sample weights multiplied by the sampling fraction) were used in all analyses in this paper. These weights account for non‐response and the complex survey design.14

Definition of injury

A reportable injury was defined as “a result of participation in a high school sport that either limited the student's full participation in the sport the day following the injury or required medical attention by a medical professional (ie, athletic trainer, physician, nurse, emergency medical technician, emergency room personnel, or dentist)”.14 Injuries such as concussions, fractures, and eye injuries were also reportable, regardless of whether they resulted in lost participation.

Data collection

Injury and risk factor data were collected from three sources: an athlete's demographic questionnaire, a coach's demographic questionnaire, and an injury report form. An injury report form was completed for each sustained injury, so an athlete who suffered multiple injuries during one incident had multiple corresponding injury reports. Data were collected by either the school's certified athletic trainer (69%) or the athletic director (31%).

The NCHSAIS directly assessed several markers of severity, including type of injury, body site injured, level of medical treatment received, and time lost from sports participation. Type of injury and body site injured were used in this analysis to describe the nature of the observed injuries. Time lost from participation was categorized as no time lost, <1 week lost, 1–3 weeks lost, and >3 weeks lost. Type of medical treatment was categorized into three levels based on the highest level of medical care: non‐emergency department (ED) medical attention (including doctors' offices, athletic trainers, or other medical personnel), an ED visit that did not result in hospitalization, and hospitalization.

Revised Injury Cost Model (RICM) methodology

Economic costs were estimated using mean costs for adolescents aged 15–19 from the RICM originally developed for the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (16, 17). Three types of cost were estimated: medical, earnings losses, and reduced quality of life (fig 11).). Costs are presented in the following categories: medical, human capital (medical + loss of future earnings), and comprehensive (medical costs + loss of future earnings + reduced quality of life costs).

figure ip14720.f1
Figure 1 Derivation of how Revised Injury Cost Model cost estimates were adapted to the North Carolina High School Athletic Injury Study dataset. QUALY, quality‐adjusted life year.

Medical costs

To develop estimates of long‐term medical costs, the cost model used data from the 1992–1994 Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS) summaries of military retirees and their dependents (including children), the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey, the 1987–1992 National Hospital Discharge Survey, the 1995–1996 National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), as well as pooled five‐state hospital discharge data (covering the years 1989–1995).16,17 Medical costs were adjusted to reflect North Carolina costs based on the ratio of the consumer price index for medical care for southern US urban cities for July 1999 to the corresponding overall consumer price index for the USA.18

Loss of future earnings

The RICM based loss of future earnings on the product of the probability of immediate work loss, the days lost if a loss occurs, and the average value of a day's work. The RICM calculated the average daily value of wage and household work using age‐ and gender‐stratified data from the 1987–1992 National Health Interview Survey and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.16,17 Work losses in this analysis represent an approximation, as there is no economic value formally associated with schoolwork. The dollar values assigned represent earnings losses for employed persons of high school age, adjusted for part‐time status. The costs also include earnings losses of parents and other caregivers who must take time off work to take injured school children to medical appointments and provide other care. Future earnings losses were adjusted to North Carolina wages based on the ratio of the average annual personal income per capita for North Carolina for 1999 and the corresponding average for the USA.19

Quality of life

The estimates of reduced quality of life and pain and suffering costs were based on the quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) lost due to injury. Lost QALYs are computed using a seven‐dimensional model that includes physician ratings16,17 on functional losses in: mobility, cognition, bending and grasping, pain, sensory, cosmetic (resulting in probability of impairment), and the ability to work (based on probability of disability). The combination of these seven dimensions, when multiplied by the total number of years of life remaining, result in an estimated lost QALY. The estimated age‐adjusted value for one QALY was $127 236, adjusted for 1999 inflation.20

Although QALY‐based costing is not the default method for valuing quality of life loss in the RICM, QALY estimation is recommended by the Panel of Cost‐effectiveness in Health and Medicine21 and seemed more appropriate than the default costing based on jury awards for non‐economic damages in consumer product injury lawsuits.

Computing cost per injury

To assign costs to the observed injuries, a three‐way matrix was created based on NCHSAIS data about the body part injured (46 categories), type of injury (16 categories), and level of medical care received (three categories), and was stratified by gender (using RICM costs for ages 15–19). NCHSAIS codes for body part injured and type of injury were re‐coded to match the NEISS diagnostic codes used in the RICM. Highest level of medical care was based on NCHSAIS categorizations of non‐ED, ED only, and hospitalization. As a result, mean medical, lost earnings, and reduced quality of life costs, stratified by gender, were applied to each possible matrix combination.

A total of 592 of the reported injuries (19.8%) in this study were initially not assigned costs. This included 561 (18.8%) that were missing data from at least one of the injury descriptors and 23 that were missing all injury descriptor data. The remaining eight uncosted injuries were either too minor or the combination of descriptors did not make sense (eg, concussion to pelvic region). For the 569 injuries that were not missing all injury descriptor information, we imputed the missing values based on the mean medical, human capital, and comprehensive costs using a hierarchy of injury type, body part injured, and level of treatment from the injuries that were assigned costs. For example, a reported fracture with no assigned body part or level of treatment (and therefore missing cost data) was assigned the mean cost of a fracture in this study. Although they were included in the total reported aggregate costs, we excluded the 569 injuries from the regression analyses because including them would result in the same estimated mean costs (based on the imputation using means) but the resulting variance estimates would be incorrect. There were no meaningful differences in the covariate patterns between the injuries with estimated costs (n = 2398) and the injuries for which costs could originally not be estimated (n = 592).

The cost data were log‐transformed before analysis on the basis of regression diagnostics, and outliers that indicated the data, as is often the case with cost estimates, were not normally distributed. Costs are presented in 1999 NC dollars, adjusted for inflation.18,19

Predictors of injury cost

The following predictors of cost were evaluated: sport, gender, grade, multiple sport participation, coaching experience, qualifications, and training (coach EQT), years of playing experience, prior injury, age, body mass index for age (BMI, centiles), and competition division. Study year was also included in the full model, but there were negligible cost changes over the course of the study, so specific results by year are not presented. A detailed description of these intrinsic and extrinsic predictors has been published previously but they are briefly described here.22

Prior injury included history of the following injuries: knee, ankle, shoulder, wrist, elbow, fracture, concussion, heat‐related illness, and others. BMI was estimated as age‐ and gender‐specific centiles.22 Coach EQT was based on coaches' answers to five yes/no questions: completion of at least a college degree, completion of a coaching class, current certification in first aid or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, at least 1 year of coaching experience in that sport, and at least 1 year of playing experience in that sport. Coach EQT was categorized as “low” if they answered yes to up to two questions, “medium” if they answered yes to three questions, or “high” if they answered yes to four or five questions. Competition division (1A–4A) was based on school enrollment.

Statistical methods

Multivariate linear regression models on log‐transformed costs were used to identify important predictors of injury cost. The models adjusted for sport, injury history, multiple sport participation, age, years of playing experience, BMI, grade, coach EQT, competition division, and study year. Separate adjusted mean costs were estimated for all 12 sports and for the eight gender‐comparable sports: boys' and girls' basketball, boys' and girls' soccer, boys' and girls' track, and baseball and softball. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS‐Callable SUDAAN V.8.0 in order to produce valid variance estimates.23


An estimated 15 038 athletes were observed for all 12 sports over the 3‐year study period. There were 2990 injuries reported for the entire study period; some athletes sustained multiple injuries. We excluded from the regression analyses the 592 injuries for which cost data were originally not estimated. Most injuries (77.5%) were medically treated outside the ED, 19.5% were treated in the ED, and 3.0% required hospitalization.

For the study population, the medical, human capital, and total economic costs per year were $940 608, $4.2 million, and $13.7 million, respectively. Per athlete, the yearly medical cost was $187, human capital cost was $838, and the comprehensive cost was $2733. Annually statewide, this translated into $9.9 million in medical costs, $44.7 million in human capital costs, and $144.6 million in comprehensive costs.

Nature of the injury

The ankle, knee, and shoulder were the most commonly injured sites of the body and, of these, shoulder injuries had the highest mean comprehensive cost per injury (table 11).). Sprains were the most common injury and accounted for the greatest percentage of costs, followed by strains and bruises.

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Distribution and mean comprehensive cost of specific severity markers (n = 2990 injuries), North Carolina High School Athletic Injury Study, 1996–1999

Time lost from sports participation

About one in five injuries resulted in no lost time; about 11% resulted in more than 3 weeks lost (table 11).). Knees and fractures were the most common injury site and type of injury that resulted in more than 3 weeks lost participation (25.0% and 41.7%, respectively). When site and type of injury were combined, other types of knee injury, particularly injuries to the knee ligaments, resulted in more than 3 weeks lost (15.0%).

Overall estimated costs of injury

Table 22 shows the exponentiated adjusted mean medical, human capital, and comprehensive costs stratified by the predictor variables. The adjusted mean medical cost per injury was $709 (95% CI $542 to $927), the adjusted mean human capital cost per injury was $2223 (95% CI $1709 to 2893), and the adjusted mean comprehensive cost per injury was $10 432 (95% CI $8062 to $13 449) (table 22).

Table thumbnail
Table 2. Exponentiated adjusted mean medical costs, human capital costs, and comprehensive costs (n = 2398 injuries*), North Carolina High School Athletic Injury Study, 1996–1999

Comprehensive costs

Sport, competition division, and coach EQT were strong predictors of the adjusted mean comprehensive cost (table 22).). For intrinsic risk factors, the highest adjusted mean comprehensive costs were associated with having a prior injury, 2–4 years of playing experience, being 16 years of age or younger, being overweight, and playing a single sport, although there were no significant differences between adjusted mean comprehensive costs between levels of each risk factor nor were they significant predictors of the comprehensive cost. The same pattern was observed for medical costs and human capital costs, with the exception of BMI. Being underweight, rather than overweight, was associated with the highest adjusted mean medical costs.

Among extrinsic risk factors, 9th–10th graders, low coach EQT, and division 1A competition division had the highest adjusted mean comprehensive cost. Wrestling had the highest cost per injury, followed by football. There were significant differences between adjusted mean comprehensive costs (and medical and human capital costs) within the levels of sport, competition division, and coach EQT, but not within grade.

For all 12 sports, the mean medical cost for boys was higher than for girls (p<0.01) (table 33).). Gender and age were the only significant predictors of the adjusted mean comprehensive cost. When restricted to gender‐comparable sports, the gender difference decreased slightly but remained significantly different (p<0.01), and gender and competition division, but not age, remained significant predictors.

Table thumbnail
Table 3 Exponentiated adjusted mean medical, human capital, and comprehensive costs, associated with gender, adjusted for other risk factors, in 1999 dollars (n = 2398 injuries*), North Carolina High School Athletic Injury ...


This study quantified the cost of sports injuries in a population of high school varsity athletes. Most injuries resulted in less than 1 week's loss of sports participation. However, even these relatively “minor” injuries resulted in a substantial cost to society. These injuries resulted in approximately $941 000 per year in medical costs ($187 per athlete), $4.2 million per year in human capital costs ($838 per athlete), and $13.7 million per year in comprehensive costs ($2733 per athlete).

Significance of findings

Most injuries were sprains and strains and occurred to the ankle or the knee, reflecting a common finding in the literature.5,8,9,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 Sport was a significant predictor of cost. Although wrestling was associated with the highest mean costs per injury, it accounted for only 7.2% of all injuries and 7.1% of comprehensive costs. Football, which accounted for 41.4% of observed injuries, accounted for 57.0% of medical costs, 58.1% of human capital costs, and 53.8% of comprehensive costs.

Key points

  • The total annual medical cost of injuries in the NCHSAIS athletes/study population/study's athletes was $940 608.
  • The total annual human capital cost was $4.2 million.
  • The total annual comprehensive cost was $13.7 million.
  • Although wrestling injuries were the most expensive per injury, football injuries accounted for 53.8% of the comprehensive costs.

The overall cost of high school sports injuries has not, until now, been adequately investigated or reported in the literature. Other studies have attempted to quantify medical costs by retrospectively examining insurance claims, but have underestimated medical costs by including only those injuries for which an insurance claim was filed.28,31,32 The only national estimate of sports‐related medical costs comes from the 1997–1998 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which estimated $680 million in medical costs for the 2‐year period of 1997–1998.33 However, this figure excluded costs associated with lost wages and reduced quality of life.

Strengths and limitations

These cost data are subject to important limitations. We did not track individual expenditures in this population but estimated them from a cost model. As part of this, we did not estimate the cost of lost earnings among athletes who may or may not have also held part‐time employment. As a result, we presented the loss of future earnings as part of a broader human capital cost. Finally, the cost estimates also exclude the time that coaches and school administration spent in investigating the injury event and filing paper work. Despite the limitations of the RICM, these estimates provide strong evidence that sports injuries in this population incur a substantial cost to society.

Very few studies have attempted to quantify the economic severity of high school sports injuries in the USA. Most used time lost from sports participation rather than cost as the primary marker of severity, and our results suggest that this may be misleading. The results of this study also suggest that ED‐based studies may miss up to 70% of injuries, thereby underestimating both the incidence and cost of injuries. Finally, although these results may not be generalizable to other study populations, the RICM methods can and should be adapted and applied in multiple settings.

Implications for prevention

The annual comprehensive cost of high school sports injuries in this population was estimated at $13.7 million and $2733 per athlete. Our findings highlight the fact that even so‐called relatively “minor” injuries result in significant costs to society. The comprehensive method used in this analysis should be applied in different populations as well as national athlete samples to provide additional critical information about the economic burden of sports injuries. This increased knowledge can help to direct limited research funding to developing cost‐effective interventions to reduce injury risk among young athletes.


We express our appreciation to Nancy L Weaver, William Kalsbeek, John Sideris, Brian Sutton, Dick Knox, and William E Prentice Jr. We acknowledge the invaluable contribution of the high school athletic trainers and athletic directors who participated in this project.


BMI - body mass index

coach EQT - coaching experience, qualifications, and training

ED - emergency department

NCHSAIS - North Carolina High School Athletic Injury Study

QALY - quality‐adjusted life year

RICM - Revised Injury Cost Model


Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal, and Skin Diseases (R01/AR42297) to the University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center (R49/CCR402444). The funding sources had no involvement in the preparation of this manuscript.

Competing interests: None.


1. van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Kemper H C G. Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries. Sports Med 1992. 1482–99.99 [PubMed]
2. van Mechelen W. The severity of sports injuries. Sports Med 1997. 24176–180.180 [PubMed]
3. Segui‐Gomez M, MacKenzie E J. Measuring the public health impact of injuries. Epidemiol Rev 2003. 253–19.19 [PubMed]
4. Orso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T. et al Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev 2006. 12212–218.218 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Olson O C. The Spokane Study: high school football injuries. Phys Sportsmed 1979. 775–82.82
6. Garrick J G, Requa R K. Injuries in high school sports. Pediatrics 1978. 61465–469.469 [PubMed]
7. McLain L G, Reynolds S. Sports injuries in a high school. Pediatrics 1989. 84446–450.450 [PubMed]
8. Powell J W, Barber‐Foss K D. Injury patterns in selected high school sports: a review of the 1995–1997 seasons. J Athl Train 1999. 34277–284.284 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Turbeville S D, Cowan L D, Owen W L. et al Risk factors for injury in high school football players. Am J Sports Med 2003. 31974–980.980 [PubMed]
10. Adkison J W, Requa R K, Garrick J G. Injury rates in high school football: a comparison of synthetic surfaces and grass fields. Clin Orthop 1974. 99131–136.136 [PubMed]
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sports‐related injuries among high school athletes, United States, 2005–06 school year. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006. 551037–1040.1040 [PubMed]
12. Rice D P, MacKenzie E J, and Associates Cost of injury in the United States: a report to Congress. San Francisco: Institute for Health and Aging, University of California and Injury Prevention Center, The Johns Hopkins University, 1989
13. Miller T R, Romano E O, Spicer R S. The cost of childhood unintentional injuries and the value of prevention. Future Child 2000. 10137–163.163 [PubMed]
14. Weaver N L, Mueller F O, Kalsbeek W D. et al The North Carolina high school athletic injury study: design and methodology. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999. 31176–182.182 [PubMed]
15. Levy P S, Lemeshow S, Levy P S, Lemeshow S. Cluster sampling in which clusters are sampled with unequal probabilities: probability proportional to size sampling. In: eds. Sampling of populations: Methods and Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1999. 333–363.363
16. Lawrence B A, Miller T R, Jensen A F. et al Estimating the costs of non‐fatal consumer product injuries in the United Sates. Inj Control Saf Promot 2000. 797–113.113
17. Miller T R, Lawrence B A, Jensen A F. et al Final Report to the US Consumer Product Safety Commission—estimating the cost to society of consumer product injuries: the revised injury cost model. Landover, MD: National Public Services Research Institute 1998
18. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, US Medical Care, South Region.‐bin/surveymost?cu (accessed 10 Oct 2007)
19. US Census Bureau Statistical Abstract of the United States. Section: income, expenditures and wealth. Personal income per capita.‐abstract‐us.html (accessed 10 Oct 2007)
20. Miller T R. Costs and functional consequences of US roadway crashes. Accid Anal Prev 1993. 25593–607.607 [PubMed]
21. Weinstein M C, Siegel J E, Gold M R. et al Recommendations of the Panel on Cost‐effectiveness in Health and Medicine [review]. JAMA 1996. 2761253–1258.1258 [PubMed]
22. Knowles S B, Marshall W B, Bowling M J. A prospective study of injury incidence among North Carolina high school athletes. Am J Epidemiol 2006. 1641209–1221.1221 [PubMed]
23. Research Triangle Institute SUDAAN User's manual, Release 8.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute 2001
24. Blyth C S, Mueller F O. Football injury survey: when and where players get hurt. Phys Sportsmed 1974. 245–51.51
25. Prager B I, Fitton W L, Cahill B R. et al High school football injuries: a prospective study and pitfalls of data collection. Am J Sports Med 1989. 17681–685.685 [PubMed]
26. DeLee J C, Farney W C. Incidence of injury in Texas high school football. Am J Sports Med 1992. 20575–580.580 [PubMed]
27. Lackland D T, Akers P, Hirata I. High school football injuries in South Carolina: a computerized survey. J S C Med Assoc 1982. 7875–78.78 [PubMed]
28. Pritchett J W. A statistical study of knee injuries due to football in high‐school athletes. J Bone Joint Surg 1982. 64240–242.242 [PubMed]
29. Culpepper M I, Niemann K M. High school football injuries in Birmingham, Alabama. South Med J. 1983;76:873–5, 878. [PubMed]
30. Stocker B D, Nyland J A, Caborn D N. et al Results of the Kentucky high school football knee injury survey. J Ky Med Assoc 1997. 95458–464.464 [PubMed]
31. Pritchett J W. High cost of high school football injuries. Am J Sports Med 1980. 8197–199.199 [PubMed]
32. Pritchett J W. Cost of high school soccer injuries. Am J Sports Med 1981. 964–66.66 [PubMed]
33. Burt C W, Overpeck M D. Emergency visits for sports‐related injuries. Ann Emerg Med 2001. 23301–308.308 [PubMed]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group