PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jmedgeneJournal of Medical GeneticsVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
J Med Genet. 2007 April; 44(4): e77.
PMCID: PMC2598037

Hypomethylation in the 11p15 telomeric imprinting domain in a patient with Silver–Russell syndrome with a CSH1 deletion (17q24) renders a functional role of this alteration unlikely

Silver–Russell syndrome (SRS) is a clinical and genetic heterogeneous malformation syndrome. Patients show intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation (<3rd centile), and numerous additional dysmorphisms such as a relative macrocephaly, a small triangular face, a prominent forehead, clinodactyly V and asymmetry of head, limbs and trunk (for a review, see Hitchins et al1). Several genetic disturbances have meanwhile been described, among them cytogenetic aberrations affecting different chromosomes and maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 in 7–10% of cases. Epimutations of the telomeric imprinting centre region 1 (ICR1) in 11p15 can be detected in at least 30% of cases (for a review, see Eggermann et al2). The functional link between these mutations and the phenotype is currently unclear, but the different genetic variations impressively illustrate the genetic heterogeneity of SRS. It has therefore been postulated that further loci are involved in the aetiology of the disease.

Among the rare chromosomal disturbances in SRS are two balanced translocations involving the region 17q24–q25.3,4 The description of these patients prompted several groups to search for an SRS candidate gene in the short arm of chromosome 17. Recently, Dörr et al5 characterised the 17q breakpoint in one of these patients more precisely, and thereby identified the karyopherin α2 (KNA2)5 gene. Nevertheless, they excluded mutations in this positional candidate gene to be relevant to the aetiology of SRS. In the same chromosomal region, the growth hormone (GH) gene cluster is localised. The GH gene cluster consists of two growth hormone genes (GH1 and GH2) and three somatomammotropin‐like genes (CSH1, CSH2 and CSH‐L). Although the central role of GH1 in human growth is well established, the roles of CSH1 and other components of the cluster are ambiguous. We recently reported on heterozygotic deletions of CSH1 in three of 64 patients with SRS without maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 7.6,7 Further search for mutations in the CSH1 and GH2, as well as the GRB2 and GRB7 genes, which are localised in the vicinity of the GH cluster, did not reveal any hint of a contribution of these factors to the formation of SRS.7,8

On the basis of the recent identification of 11p15 hypomethylation in >30% of patients and the potential functional link to the SRS phenotype, we decided to test our three CSH1 deletion carriers for this alteration using a methylation‐sensitive Southern blot approach.9 Among our three patients, we could identify one CSH1 deletion carrier with a nearly complete hypomethylation at the ICR1 locus. This patient7 showed the characteristic clinical signs of SRS, in particular asymmetry of limbs, which is typically associated with this epigenetic mutation in the ICR1. This asymmetry can be attributed to the mosaicism for the 11p15 epimutation, which probably originates from a postzygotic error.

To sum up, the identification of the ICR1 hypomethylation in a CSH1 deletion carrier makes a relevant role of this deletion in the aetiology of SRS unlikely. The CSH1 deletion can therefore be regarded as a polymorphism without any causal relationship to SRS.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Doktor‐Robert‐Pfleger‐Stiftung.

References

1. Hitchins M P, Stanier P, Preece M A, Moore G E. Silver‐Russell syndrome: a dissection of the genetic aetiology and candidate chromosomal regions. J Med Genet 2001. 38810–819.819 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Eggermann T, Schönherr N, Meyer E, Obermann C, Mavany M, Eggermann K, Ranke M B, Wollmann H A. Epigenetic mutations in 11p15 in Silver‐Russell syndrome are restricted to the telomeric imprinting domain. J Med Genet 2006. 43615–616.616 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Ramirez‐Duenas M L, Medina C, Ocampo‐Campos R, Rivera H. Severe Silver‐Russell syndrome and translocation (17;20)(q25;q13). Clin Genet 1992. 4151–53.53 [PubMed]
4. Midro A T, Debek K, Samicka A, Marcinkiewicz D, Rogowska M. Second observation of Silver‐Russell syndrome in a carrier of a reciprocal translocation with one breakpoint at site 17q25. Clin Genet 1993. 4453–55.55 [PubMed]
5. Dörr S, Schlicker M, Hansmann I. Genomic structure of karyopherin α2 (KPNA2) within a low‐copy repeat on chromosome 17q23–q24 and mutation analysis in patients with Russell‐Silver syndrome. Hum Genet 2001. 109479–486.486 [PubMed]
6. Eggermann T, Eggermann K, Mergenthaler S, Kuner R, Kaiser P, Ranke M B, Wollmann H A. Paternally inherited deletion of CSH1 in a patient with Silver‐Russell syndrome. J Med Genet 1998. 35784–786.786 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Prager S, Wollmann H A, Mergenthaler S, Mavany M, Eggermann K, Ranke M B, Eggermann T. Characterisation of genomic variants in CSH1 and GH2, two candidate genes for Silver‐Russell syndrome in 17q24–q25. Genet Test 2003. 7259–263.263 [PubMed]
8. Hitchins M P, Apostolidou S, Abu‐Amero S, Monk D, Stanier P, Preece M A, Moore G E. Investigation of the GRB2, GRB7 and CSH1 genes as candidates for the Silver‐Russell syndrome (SRS) chromosome 17q SRS. J Med Genet 2002. 39e13 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Schönherr N, Meyer E, Eggermann K, Ranke M B, Wollmann Ha (Epi)mutations in 11p15 significantly contribute to Silver‐Russell syndrome: but are they generally involved in growth retardation. Eur J Med Genet 2006. 49414–418.418 [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group