PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Biochim Biophys Acta. Author manuscript; available in PMC Dec 1, 2009.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2596883
NIHMSID: NIHMS80750
Retinoids regulate TGFβ signaling at the level of Smad2 phosphorylation and nuclear accumulation
Loretta L. Hoover, Elizabeth G. Burton, Megan L. O'Neill, Bonnie A. Brooks, Shilpa Sreedharan, Nineveh A. Dawson, and Steven W. Kubalak
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Cardiovascular Developmental Biology Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425
Address correspondence to: Steven W. Kubalak, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Ave Suite 601BSB Charleston, SC 29425; Email: kubalaks/at/musc.edu
Indirect regulation of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling by retinoids occurs on a long-term timescale, secondary to transcriptional events. Studies by our group show loss of retinoid X receptor (RXR) alpha results in increased TGFβ2 in the midgestational heart, which may play a role in the cardiac defects seen in this model[1]. Acute and direct interactions between retinoid and TGFβ signaling, however, are not clearly understood. Treatment of dispersed hearts and NIH3T3 cells for one-hour with TGFβ and retinoids (dual treatment) resulted in increased phosphorylated Smad2 and Smad3 when compared to treatment with TGFβ alone. Of all dual treatments, those with the RXR agonist Bexarotene, resulted in the highest level of phosphorylated Smad2, a 7-fold increase over TGFβ2 alone. Additionally, during dual treatment phosphorylation of Smad2 occurs via the TGFβ type I receptor but not by increased activation of the receptor. As loss of RXRα results in increased levels of Smad2 phosphorylation in response to TGFβ treatment and since nuclear accumulation of phosphorylated Smad2 is decreased during dual treatment, we propose that RXRα directly regulates the activities of Smad2. These data show retinoid signaling influences the TGFβ pathway in an acute and direct manner that has been unappreciated until now.
Keywords: Smad, retinoic acid, transforming growth factor-β, retinoid X receptor, phosphorylation, nuclear accumulation
TGFβ is a pleiotropic cytokine which affects cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, immune modulation and epithelial to mesenchymal transformation [2]. With or without the assistance of the TGFβ type III receptor (TβRIII) [3] TGFβ isoforms bind to the constitutively active type II receptor (TβRII) promoting its heterodimerization with and activation of the type I receptor (TβRI) [4]. TβRI then acts as a serine/threonine kinase that phosphorylates the C-terminal SXS motif of the most immediate downstream signal, TGFβ-activated receptor Smads, Smad2 and Smad3 (Smad2/3) [4]. Smad2/3 can be phosphorylated at alternate motifs by other kinases outside of the canonical TGFβ signaling scheme [5] modifying the downstream events normally ascribed to TGFβ-mediated Smad signaling [6]. Once phosphorylated by TβRI, Smad2/3 heterodimerize with Smad4, i.e. the common Smad, aptly named because it is common to both the TGFβ and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathways [4]. The Smad4/Smad2/3 complex then accumulates in the nucleus [7] where it interacts with co-activators and -repressors to regulate the transcription of specific target genes [8].
There are several points of control between TGFβ binding its receptor and affecting downstream transcriptional targets. SARA, the Smad anchor for receptor activation, regulates the subcellular localization of Smad2 and its availability to the kinase action of TβRI [9]. The inhibitory Smads, Smad6 and Smad7, block receptor Smad phosphorylation via competitive inhibition at the level of the receptor [10]. The expression of Smad7 is positively regulated by activation of the canonical TGFβ cascade and therefore serves as a negative feedback mechanism to blunt TGFβ signaling [11]. Smurfs, Smad-ubiquitin regulatory factors, are E3 ligases that mediate Smad and TGFβ receptor ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Smurf2 has been shown to ubiquitinate newly activated Smad2 that has accumulated in the nucleus [12]. Smurfs also interact with Smad7 to regulate ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of TβRI [13].
Once activated and in the nucleus, the transcriptional effects of TGFβ-activated receptor Smads can be blunted by binding the transcriptional co-repressors Ski and Sno [14]. Additionally, the phosphatase activity of protein phosphatase 1A (PPM1A) is known to regulate the duration of TGFβ's transcriptional effects by decreasing the amount of SXS-motif-phosphorylated Smad2 (pSmad2) in the nucleus [15].
The retinoid derivatives of vitamin A show their own canonical signaling cascade, which ultimately regulates developmental patterning and apoptosis. Retinoids are enzymatically converted from vitamin A and act as the ligands which agonize retinoid receptors promoting their nuclear import [16], dimerization, and transcriptional effects [17-19]. Retinoid receptor hetero- (RXR/RAR) or homo- (RXR/RXR) dimers bind to retinoic acid response elements (RARE) or retinoid X response elements (RXRE), respectively, within the promoter regions of retinoid target genes such as Hox family members, the metabolic regulator phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, and retinoid receptors themselves [20]. As such, retinoid receptors are transcriptional regulators, however, there is evidence to suggest that they serve additional purposes in the cell. It is known that retinoid signaling can affect TGFβ signaling at the level of the receptor Smads. Cao and colleagues proposed that all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) mediates the activity of an unidentified Smad2 phosphatase leading to lower levels of activated Smad2 [21]. It is unclear if this purported phosphatase and PPM1A are one and the same. It has also been reported that antagonist-treated and therefore unliganded RAR binds Smad3 and increases Smad3-driven transcription [22]. Additionally the transcriptional corepressor TGFβ-induced factor homeobox (TGIF) has been shown to regulate Smad2- and RXR- driven transcription [22, 23]. During high levels of TGFβ signaling indicated by increased nuclear pSmad2, TGIF binds the Smads and prevents their interaction with transcriptional coactivators CBP and p300, effectively blunting Smad-mediated transcription [24, 25]. Under conditions of decreased nuclear pSmad2, however, TGIF binds RXREs, blocking the transcriptional activity of RXR homodimers [26].
Clearly there is growing evidence that TGFβ and retinoid pathways reciprocally regulate each other on a long-term time scale secondary to transcriptional and translational changes. Our findings herein represent the first report examining the acute effect of retinoids on TGFβ-activated receptor Smad phosphorylation and nuclear accumulation.
Cell lines and treatments
NIH3T3 cells were obtained from ATCC and maintained according to supplier's recommendations. RXRα knockout (RXRα-/-) and matched wild type littermate mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were isolated from E12.5 embryos generated from timed RXRα+/- matings and maintained as previously described [27]. Embryonic tails were genotyped as described [1]. For dispersed heart cultures, hearts minus atria were dissected from E12.5 embryos. Hearts were placed in 0.05% trypsin EDTA (Gibco) and incubated at 37°C with gentle trituration every 2 minutes until minimal intact tissue remained, approximately 6 minutes total. Dispersed heart media (DMEM + 10% rat serum) was added to the mixture at a 1:1 concentration and cells were pelleted via centrifugation (200xg for five minutes). Supernatant was removed and pellets were resuspended in 100μl of media per heart followed by micromass plating in 35 mm cell culture dishes (Corning). Cultures were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2. Twelve hours later, 900μl of media was added to each dish and cells were allowed to incubate for an additional 60 hours. For one-hour treatments, 300,000 MEFs or NIH3T3 cells were plated in 35 mm dishes 24 hours prior to use. All cells and dispersed hearts were serum starved for two hours before addition of atRA (Sigma), 9-cis-retinoic acid (9-cisRA) (Sigma), Bexarotene (Toronto Chemical Company), TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 (R&D). Retinoids were diluted in DMSO (Sigma) and TGFβ isoforms were diluted in 4 mM HCl with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). All “diluent” (i.e. control) treatments received appropriate volumes of DMSO and TGFβ diluent. For TβRI kinase inhibition, cells were serum starved prior to addition of SB431452 reconstituted in DMSO. Cells were incubated for 30 minutes with inhibitor prior to addition of TGFβ and retinoids.
Immunoblotting
Rabbit anti-phosphorylated Smad2 (Ser465/467, cat. #3108), mouse anti-Smad2 (#3103), rabbit anti-phosphorylated Smad2 (Ser245/250/255, #3108), rabbit anti-phosphorylated Smad3 (Ser425/425, #9520) and rabbit anti-Histone H3 (#9175) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technologies; mouse anti-β-tubulin (Accurate Chemical Company) and HRP conjugated-anti-phosphorylated threonine (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used for Western blotting. Total proteins were harvested using a standard RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF) containing protease inhibitors (Complete Mini, Roche, Palo Alto, CA) or fractionated with the Ne-Per Cytoplasmic Nuclear Extraction Kit according to manufacturers recommendations (Pierce). Equal volumes were boiled with denaturing loading buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 50% Glycerol, 8% SDS, 400 mM DTT, 0.4% Bromophenol Blue) and run on a 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gel for 120 minutes at 130 volts. Membrane protein enrichment for TβRI analysis was accomplished with a two-step RIPA protocol. Briefly, for step one, cells were lysed in RIPA, pelleted via centrifugation and the supernatant was reserved. For step two, the resulting pellet was resuspended in RIPA and subject to constant gentle rocking at 4°C for one hour with 10 seconds of maximum speed vortexing every 10 minutes. Following centrifugation the supernatants from step one and two were combined and utilized for further assays.
Immunocytochemistry
Five thousand NIH3T3 cells were seeded into 4-well chamber slides (Lab-Tek) and incubated overnight. Cells were serum starved for two hours prior to a one-hour treatment with diluent or combinations of 3ng/ml TGFβ2 and 75nM 9-cisRA. Total Smad2 immunolocalization was performed using total Smad2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies # 3122) according to manufacturer's suggested protocol. Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor® 488 secondary antibody (Invitrogen) was applied at a concentration of 1:100 prior to coverslipping. Photographic documentation was performed with a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS confocal microscope. Relative nuclear Smad2 localization was determined by maintaining constant laser/gain settings throughout microscopic documentation and by counting nuclear pixel density using ImageJ software (freeware).
Immunoprecipitation of TβRI
Twenty microliters of agarose-conjugated rabbit anti-TβRI (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was incubated overnight at 4°C with 500μg of membrane-enriched proteins harvested from treated or untreated NIH3T3 cells. Agarose beads plus bait and prey proteins were pelleted, washed four times in RIPA buffer and resuspended in 2X denaturing loading buffer. SDS PAGE was performed as described above.
Luciferase Assay
Mink lung epithelial cells (MLEC) stably transfected with a PAI-1-luciferase reporter construct were obtained from Dr. Daniel Rifkin and were maintained as previously described [28]. In 96-well format, 15,000 cells were plated per well in test media (DMEM + 0.1% BSA) three hours prior to use and treated for either one or seven hours with combinations of TGFβ (3ng/ml) and retinoids (75nM). Following the one-hour treatment, the cells were washed with PBS and incubated for an additional 6 hours in test media. Treatments were executed in triplicate and luciferase assay was performed using Bright Glo reagent (Promega) according to manufacturers suggested protocol. Luciferase levels were obtained by 30-second well readings on a 96-well format luminometer (Perkin-Elmer).
Densitometry
Immunoblot band intensities were determined using ImageJ software and pSmad levels were normalized to β-tubulin levels. β-tubulin was utilized as a loading control for densitometry and was considered more appropriate than total Smad2 as dephosphorylated Smad2 undergoes TGFβ-activated proteasomal degradation [12]. This degradation occurs rapidly in response to TGFβ and can affect the apparent levels of total Smad2 (Supplemental Figure 1 and [12]). β-tubulin levels were not affected by a one-hour treatment with the ligands used in these studies (Supplemental Figure 1).
Statistics
Parametric or non-parametric statistical tests were performed using SPSS software when appropriate. Statistical significance was assumed at a p-value = .05. For non-quantified experiments, representative data from a minimum of three independent trials are shown.
One-hour co-treatment with TGFβ and retinoids enhances pSmad2 accumulation compared to treatment with TGFβ alone
While it is known that downstream interactions between TGFβ and retinoid signaling pathways exist, it is unknown if they affect each other on an acute timescale. To explore potential acute interactions between TGFβ and retinoids we treated NIH3T3, MEFs and dispersed heart cells for one hour with combinations of TGFβ1 or TGFβ2 and retinoid isoforms of varying receptor affinities [29] and determined the levels of subsequent Smad2 and Smad3 phosphorylation. A one hour time point was chosen because, as previously reported, a one-hour treatment with TGFβ alone results in maximum accumulation of phosphorylated Smad2 from the undetectable levels seen at time zero [12]. Concentration-response studies with varying TGFβ2 concentrations in the absence or presence of 75nM 9-cisRA resulted in maximum Smad2 phosphorylation at 3ng/ml TGFβ2 (Figure 1A). Phosphorylated Smad3 levels were similarly affected as a result of dual-treatment (data not shown). Likewise, treatment with varying concentrations of 9cis- or atRA combined with 3ng/ml TGFβ2 altered the Smad2 phosphorylation profile in a manner that was retinoid concentration-dependent (Figure 1B). At maximally effective concentrations of 9cis- or atRA combined with TGFβ2 (3ng/ml), pSmad2 levels were nearly three fold increased over those seen with TGFβ2 treatment alone (Figure 1C). A similar Smad2 phosphorylation profile was observed using TGFβ1 in concert with 9cis-RA (data not shown). Dual-treatment with the RXR specific ligand, Bexarotene, in a concentration range which solely targets RXR resulted in a seven-fold increase in pSmad2 levels over those seen after treating with TGFβ2 alone (Figure 1B). Additionally, time course experiments showed that TGFβ2 treatment results in a peak level of pSmad2 at one hour post treatment followed by a return toward basal levels 24 hours later (Figure 1D). Adding retinoids to the TGFβ2 treatment results in higher levels of pSmad2, which remain elevated at 24 hours post treatment (Figure 1D) demonstrating that retinoids not only potentiate the phosphorylation of Smad2 but also affect the dynamics of its dephosphorylation. Lastly, phosphorylation of the Smad2 linker domain was not affected by any combination of TGFβ or retinoid treatment (Supplemental Figure 2 and data not shown) demonstrating that this potentiated phosphorylation effect is specific to the SXS motif of Smad2.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Retinoids, in the presence of TGFβ2, increase pSmad2 levels above those seen after a one-hour treatment with TGFβ2 alone. A, NIH3T3 cells were treated for one hour with 0.1 - 20ng/ml of TGFβ2 in the absence (closed circles) or (more ...)
Phosphorylation of Smad2 during dual-treatments occurs via TβRI
To begin to investigate the mechanism of the potentiation of Smad2 phosphorylation in the presence of TGFβ and retinoids, NIH3T3 cells were pretreated with SB431542, a specific and potent inhibitor of TGFβ-induced phosphorylation of Smad2 which acts on TβRI [30]. With inhibitor present, cells were treated for one-hour with TGFβ2 alone or in combination with 9-cisRA followed by Western blot analysis of pSmad2 levels. Loss of Smad2 phosphorylation was seen in a SB431542 dose-dependent manner for both TGFβ2 and TGFβ2 plus 9-cisRA treated cells (Figure 2A). These data show that all phosphorylation of Smad2 occurs via action of TβRI regardless of the presence of retinoids and importantly rules out the action of alternate kinases. We next asked if retinoids in the presence of TGFβ lead to increased activity of TβRI as assessed by detecting phosphorylation of threonines within TβRI itself. NIH3T3 cells were treated with combinations of 9-cisRA and TGFβ2 for one hour and membrane proteins were extracted. Immunoprecipitation of TβRI was performed followed by Western blot using HRP conjugated anti-threonine antibodies. In accordance with the literature [31, 32], we found that untreated cells (no media change) show no detectable basal levels of TβRI threonine phosphorylation (Figure 2B Lane 1) whereas a one-hour treatment with ligands resulted in TβRI phosphorylation (Figure 2B Lanes 3-5). Phosphorylation in response to TGFβ (Lane 3) was increased above that seen for diluent treatment (Lane 2). Densitometric analysis showed that treatment with 9-cisRA plus TGFβ2 did not result in statistically significant elevation (p = .151) of phospho-threonine levels compared to levels seen with TGFβ treatment alone (Figure 2C) suggesting increased activity of the type I receptor is not the mechanism by which pSmad2 is elevated during co-treatment with TGFβ and retinoids.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phosphorylation of Smad2 SXS motif occurs solely via TβRI during co-treatment with TGFβ2 and 9-cisRA. A. NIH3T3 cells were pretreated for 30 minutes with 0, 1.0 or 10uM of TβRI inhibitor (SB431542) prior to addition of 3ng/ml TGFβ2 (more ...)
Interestingly, our results showed that the act of changing media can result in a detectable level of phosphorylation of the TβRI and though beyond the scope of this study, we suspect that shear fluid stress may play a role in this effect. A 2004 article by Morgera et. al. described that adding fluid shear stress in the presence of high glucose media (which is utilized in our experiments) led to a “30% increase in TGFβ release compared to glucose stress alone” in a mesothelial cell model [33]. This released TGFβ could act in an autocrine manner causing some phosphorylation of the TβRI.
MEFs and dispersed hearts from RXRα-/- embryos show increased pSmad2 following treatment with TGFβ2 in the absence of added retinoids
In order to determine the potential role of RXRα in TGFβ2-mediated Smad2 phosphorylation, wild type and RXRα-/- MEFs and dispersed hearts cells were generated from E12.5 mice. Cells were treated for one hour with TGFβ2 in the absence or presence of 9-cisRA and pSmad2 levels were detected using Western blot. RXRα-/- MEFs (Figure 3A) and dispersed hearts (Figure 3B) showed higher levels of pSmad2 in response to a one hour TGFβ2 treatment when compared to matched wild type controls. Moreover, when cells were co-treated with 9-cisRA and TGFβ2, pSmad2 levels were not elevated beyond that of TGFβ2 alone (Figure 3A) suggesting that RXRα likely plays a direct role in controlling the levels of TGFβ2-mediated Smad2 phosphorylation in both the absence and presence of added RA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Loss of RXRα leads to increased TGFβ2 mediated-Smad2 phosphorylation. A. Wild type (+/+) and RXRα-/- (-/-) MEFs were treated for one hour with 3ng/ml TGFβ2, 75nM 9-cisRA or both. Total cellular proteins were subjected to (more ...)
Potentiation of Smad phosphorylation secondary to dual treatment does not yield increased receptor Smad-driven transcription
To determine the downstream signaling potential of the increased pSmad2/3 resulting from dual treatment versus that of treating with TGFβ alone, we utilized MLEC cells stably transfected with PAI-1-luciferase reporter. We treated equal numbers of cells and assayed for luciferase production seven hours after a one- or seven-hour exposure to TGFβ and/or retinoids. A one-hour exposure to TGFβ2 alone followed by a washout and six-hour serum free incubation resulted in similar levels of luciferase production as a seven-hour exposure to TGFβ2 (Figure 4A). This finding alone demonstrates that the downstream effect of TGFβ2 is determined rapidly, and that continual exposure to ligand is not necessary to yield significant transcriptional changes. Interestingly, at seven hours post treatment, the one and seven hour dual treatments with TGFβ2 and 9-cisRA resulted in less luciferase production than seen after treatment with TGFβ2 alone (Figure 4A) suggesting that although pSmad2/3 levels are escalated by one hour after dual treatment, only a fraction of this pSmad pool is positively regulating transcription. In order to determine the mechanism by which this occurs, we performed cytoplasmic and nuclear fractionation of NIH3T3 cells that were treated with combinations of retinoids and TGFβ (Figure 4B). Consistent with the above transcription results, in cells treated solely with TGFβ, the entire pSmad2 pool shuttles to the nucleus, whereas with dual treatment, a proportion of the pSmad2 remains cytoplasmic. Similarly, we found that immunocytochemistry of dual-treated NIH3T3 cells (Figure 5D, E) showed significantly less nuclear Smad2 than did cells treated with TGFβ2 alone (Figure 5C, E). These findings can be explained by the ability of retinoid receptors to bind and sequester Smads [22] and to act as regulators for the nuclear uptake of its binding partners [34].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Retinoid ligands blunt Smad2-nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activity. A. MLEC cells harboring the PAI-1-luciferase construct were used to infer levels of TGFβ-activated receptor Smad-driven transcription in the absence and presence of (more ...)
Figure 5
Figure 5
During TGFβ2 treatment, Smad2 shows less nuclear localization in the presence of retinoids. A. NIH3T3 cells were treated for one hour with diluent, B. 75nM 9-cisRA, C. 3ng/ml TGFβ2, and D. a combination of 3ng/ml TGFβ2 plus 75nM (more ...)
Our data show that retinoids in the presence of TGFβ can potentiate Smad2/3 phosphorylation and this potentiation is likely not due to transcriptional events as it occurs during a one-hour timeframe. Retinoid ligands alone had no effect on Smad2 phosphorylation (Figures 1B-C) demonstrating that immediate activation of endogenous local, latent TGFβ by retinoids is not contributing to the elevated pSmad2 seen with dual treatment in this system. Further, this work suggests that retinoid signaling controls the availability of Smad2 for phosphorylation by the TβRI as well as nuclear uptake of pSmad2. As it is known that retinoid receptors physically interact with Smads [22] and that unliganded RXR exists both in the cytosol and nucleus [16], we hypothesize that unliganded RXRα sequesters a portion of the total Smad2 pool, preventing it from being phosphorylated by the TβRI in the presence of TGFβ (Box 1 Figure 6). When RXRα is absent from the cytosol (as is the case during 9-cisRA treatment which promotes RXRα nuclear translocation [16] or in RXRα-/- MEFs) Smad2 is not sequestered by RXRα and proportionally more Smad2 can be phosphorylated under TGFβ stimulation (Figure 3B). Alternately, acute exposure to retinoids may affect other elements which bind Smad2, such as microtubules, SARA, or connexins [9, 35, 36] (Box 2 Figure 6). Reorganization of these elements at or near the TβRI could modify the availability of Smad2 to be phosphorylated. An alternate hypothesis supported by the literature is that liganded RXR heterodimerizes with the vitamin D receptor (VDR) [37] lessening known Smad-VDR interplay thus allowing more Smads to be available for canonical TGFβ signaling.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Schematic of working hypothesis by which retinoid signaling via RXRα may directly regulate Smad phosphorylation and subcellular accumulation. Smad2 is phosphorylated by TβRI upon TGFβ exposure. Retinoid receptors can directly bind (more ...)
Our data suggest that the increased pSmad2 in dual-treated wild type cells does not escalate downstream pSmad2-mediated events secondary to decreased nuclear accumulation of Smad2 (Box 3 Figure 6). We employed a Smad binding element reporter assay and showed that a one hour treatment with TGFβ2 plus 9-cisRA results in less Smad2/3-driven transcription than a treatment with TGFβ2 alone. Similar findings were described by Cao et. al. albeit after an 18 hour treatment with TGFβ and atRA [21]. The mechanism by which retinoid receptors control Smad nuclear accumulation is still unclear however it may be explained by the fact that RXRα, in the presence of ligand, dimerizes with other nuclear receptors and translocates to the nucleus to mediate transcription thus blunting its purported shuttle function (Figure 4B and Figure 5). As pSmad2 is dephosphorylated in the nucleus [15], decreased nuclear uptake may also explain the sustained elevation of pSmad2 levels observed over a time course with dual treatment (Figure 1D). Alternately, in dual-treated cells it is possible that RXRα shuttles to the nucleus and binds a portion of the nuclear pSmad2, preventing its transcriptional activities (Box 4 Figure 6). Co-immunoprecipitation and live cell imaging studies utilizing fluorescently–tagged Smads and retinoid receptors are currently being undertaken to assess the extent of subcellular co-localization of these players during TGFβ and retinoic acid treatments.
Interactions between retinoid receptors and Smads have important implications for RXRα null cells. In the RXRα-/- embryo we have noted elevated levels of proteins (i.e. fibronectin) [38] and events (i.e. apoptosis) [1] that are positively regulated by TGFβ. We suspect in addition to elevated TGFβ2 levels detected in the RXRα-/-, the loss of RXRα-mediated negative regulation of pSmad2 driven transcription is responsible for the upregulation of events downstream of TGFβ signaling and possibly many of the developmental defects seen in this mouse.
To determine the effects of Smad2 dosage in vivo, crosses between RXRα+/- and Smad2+/- mice are currently being performed. As decreased dosage of TGFβ2 results in a partial rescue of the cardiac phenotype seen in the RXRα-/- [1], we hypothesize that Smad2 heterozygosity will show a similar effect on the RXRα knockout mouse if TGFβ's effects are Smad-dependent. As TGFβ can signal through Smad-independent pathways, it is important to determine the role of canonical signaling during cardiac development. It is clear that retinoids can influence canonical TGFβ signaling on a long-term timescale dependent on transcriptional events and this study demonstrates that retinoids directly regulate Smad activity on a truncated timescale independent of retinoid-mediated transcription. This effect may be particularly relevant to the rapid growth and remodeling required by the developing embryo. Our observations contribute to the growing list of known interactions between retinoid and TGFβ signaling and future studies will lead us to a better understanding of such crosstalk.
01: Supplemental Figure 1
Total Smad2 levels decrease upon a one-hour TGFβ2 treatment whereas β-tubulin levels remain constant. NIH3T3 cells were treated for one hour with diluent, TGFβ2 (3ng/ml), and TGFβ2 plus increasing concentrations of 9-cisRA (10nM, 50nM, 100nM, 400nM). Western blot was performed to detect pSmad2, β-tubulin and total Smad2.
02: Supplemental Figure 2
Treatment with TGFβ2 in the absence or presence of 9-cisRA has no effect on Smad2 linker region phosphorylation. NIH3T3 cells were treated with 3ng/ml TGFβ2 alone and in combination with 75nM 9-cisRA for one hour. Smad2 phosphorylation was determined for both the Linker region (linker) and SXS motif (pSmad2) by Western blot.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Rifkin for generously providing the stably transfected MLEC line and Mr. Jarrett Walsh for helpful discussions regarding this work. This work was supported by NIH Grant Number C06 RR018823 and C06 RR015455 from the Extramural Research Facilities Program of the National Center for Research Resources, NIH T32 HL07260 (LLH) and NIH/NHLBI R01 HL83116 (SWK).
Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1. Kubalak SW, Hutson DR, Scott KK, Shannon RA. Elevated transforming growth factor beta2 enhances apoptosis and contributes to abnormal outflow tract and aortic sac development in retinoic X receptor alpha knockout embryos. Development. 2002;129:733–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Roberts AB, Derynck R. Meeting report: signaling schemes for TGF-beta. Sci STKE. 2001;2001:PE43. [PubMed]
3. Rotzer D, Roth M, Lutz M, Lindemann D, Sebald W, Knaus P. Type III TGF-beta receptor-independent signalling of TGF-beta2 via TbetaRII-B, an alternatively spliced TGF-beta type II receptor. Embo J. 2001;20:480–90. [PubMed]
4. Lutz M, Knaus P. Integration of the TGF-beta pathway into the cellular signalling network. Cell Signal. 2002;14:977–88. [PubMed]
5. Sapkota G, Knockaert M, Alarcon C, Montalvo E, Brivanlou AH, Massague J. Dephosphorylation of the linker regions of Smad1 and Smad2/3 by small C-terminal domain phosphatases has distinct outcomes for bone morphogenetic protein and transforming growth factor-beta pathways. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:40412–9. [PubMed]
6. Hayashida T, Decaestecker M, Schnaper HW. Cross-talk between ERK MAP kinase and Smad signaling pathways enhances TGF-beta-dependent responses in human mesangial cells. Faseb J. 2003;17:1576–8. [PubMed]
7. Xu L, Kang Y, Col S, Massague J. Smad2 nucleocytoplasmic shuttling by nucleoporins CAN/Nup214 and Nup153 feeds TGFbeta signaling complexes in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Mol Cell. 2002;10:271–82. [PubMed]
8. Feng XH, Derynck R. Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:659–93. [PubMed]
9. Tsukazaki T, Chiang TA, Davison AF, Attisano L, Wrana JL. SARA, a FYVE domain protein that recruits Smad2 to the TGFbeta receptor. Cell. 1998;95:779–91. [PubMed]
10. Park SH. Fine tuning and cross-talking of TGF-beta signal by inhibitory Smads. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;38:9–16. [PubMed]
11. Nakao A, Afrakhte M, Moren A, Nakayama T, Christian JL, Heuchel R, Itoh S, Kawabata M, Heldin NE, Heldin CH, ten Dijke P. Identification of Smad7, a TGFbeta-inducible antagonist of TGF-beta signalling. Nature. 1997;389:631–5. [PubMed]
12. Lo RS, Massague J. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of TGF-beta-activated smad2. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:472–8. [PubMed]
13. Kavsak P, Rasmussen RK, Causing CG, Bonni S, Zhu H, Thomsen GH, Wrana JL. Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF beta receptor for degradation. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1365–75. [PubMed]
14. Liu X, Sun Y, Weinberg RA, Lodish HF. Ski/Sno and TGF-beta signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001;12:1–8. [PubMed]
15. Lin X, Duan X, Liang YY, Su Y, Wrighton KH, Long J, Hu M, Davis CM, Wang J, Brunicardi FC, Shi Y, Chen YG, Meng A, Feng XH. PPM1A functions as a Smad phosphatase to terminate TGFbeta signaling. Cell. 2006;125:915–28. [PubMed]
16. Yasmin R, Williams RM, Xu M, Noy N. Nuclear import of the retinoid X receptor, the vitamin D receptor, and their mutual heterodimer. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:40152–60. [PubMed]
17. Chambon P. A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. Faseb J. 1996;10:940–54. [PubMed]
18. Germain P, Chambon P, Eichele G, Evans RM, Lazar MA, Leid M, De Lera AR, Lotan R, Mangelsdorf DJ, Gronemeyer H. International Union of Pharmacology. LX. Retinoic acid receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2006;58:712–25. [PubMed]
19. Germain P, Chambon P, Eichele G, Evans RM, Lazar MA, Leid M, De Lera AR, Lotan R, Mangelsdorf DJ, Gronemeyer H. International Union of Pharmacology. LXIII. Retinoid X receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2006;58:760–72. [PubMed]
20. McGrane MM. Vitamin A regulation of gene expression: molecular mechanism of a prototype gene. J Nutr Biochem. 2007;18:497–508. [PubMed]
21. Cao Z, Flanders KC, Bertolette D, Lyakh LA, Wurthner JU, Parks WT, Letterio JJ, Ruscetti FW, Roberts AB. Levels of phospho-Smad2/3 are sensors of the interplay between effects of TGF-beta and retinoic acid on monocytic and granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells. Blood. 2003;101:498–507. [PubMed]
22. Pendaries V, Verrecchia F, Michel S, Mauviel A. Retinoic acid receptors interfere with the TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway in a ligand-specific manner. Oncogene. 2003;22:8212–20. [PubMed]
23. Wotton D, Lo RS, Swaby LA, Massague J. Multiple modes of repression by the Smad transcriptional corepressor TGIF. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:37105–10. [PubMed]
24. Pessah M, Prunier C, Marais J, Ferrand N, Mazars A, Lallemand F, Gauthier JM, Atfi A. c-Jun interacts with the corepressor TG-interacting factor (TGIF) to suppress Smad2 transcriptional activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:6198–203. [PubMed]
25. Wotton D, Knoepfler PS, Laherty CD, Eisenman RN, Massague J. The Smad transcriptional corepressor TGIF recruits mSin3. Cell Growth Differ. 2001;12:457–63. [PubMed]
26. Yang W, Rachez C, Freedman LP. Discrete roles for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and retinoid X receptor in recruiting nuclear receptor coactivators. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:8008–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Sucov HM, Lou J, Gruber PJ, Kubalak SW, Dyson E, Gumeringer CL, Lee RY, Moles SA, Chien KR, Giguere V, Evans RM. The molecular genetics of retinoic acid receptors: cardiovascular and limb development. Biochem Soc Symp. 1996;62:143–56. [PubMed]
28. Abe M, Harpel JG, Metz CN, Nunes I, Loskutoff DJ, Rifkin DB. An assay for transforming growth factor-beta using cells transfected with a plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter-luciferase construct. Anal Biochem. 1994;216:276–84. [PubMed]
29. Hoover LL, Burton EG, Brooks BA, Kubalak SW. The expanding role for retinoid signaling in heart development. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL: TSW Development & Embryology. 2008;8:194–211. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Inman GJ, Nicolas FJ, Callahan JF, Harling JD, Gaster LM, Reith AD, Laping NJ, Hill CS. SB-431542 is a potent and specific inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta superfamily type I activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) receptors ALK4, ALK5, and ALK7. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;62:65–74. [PubMed]
31. Huse M, Muir TW, Xu L, Chen YG, Kuriyan J, Massague J. The TGF beta receptor activation process: an inhibitor- to substrate-binding switch. Mol Cell. 2001;8:671–82. [PubMed]
32. Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113:685–700. [PubMed]
33. Morgera S, Schlenstedt J, Giessing M, Deger S, Hocher B, Neumayer HH. Glucose-mediated Transforming Growth Factor-beta1 Release in Human Mesothelial Cells is Endothelin Independent. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2004;44:S216–S218. [PubMed]
34. Prufer K, Barsony J. Retinoid X receptor dominates the nuclear import and export of the unliganded vitamin D receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16:1738–51. [PubMed]
35. Dong C, Li Z, Alvarez R, Jr, Feng XH, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ. Microtubule binding to Smads may regulate TGF beta activity. Mol Cell. 2000;5:27–34. [PubMed]
36. Dai P, Nakagami T, Tanaka H, Hitomi T, Takamatsu T. Cx43 mediates TGF-beta signaling through competitive Smads binding to microtubules. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:2264–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Sanchez-Martinez R, Castillo AI, Steinmeyer A, Aranda A. The retinoid X receptor ligand restores defective signalling by the vitamin D receptor. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:1030–4. [PubMed]
38. Jenkins SJ, Hutson DR, Kubalak SW. Analysis of the proepicardium-epicardium transition during the malformation of the RXRalpha-/- epicardium. Dev Dyn. 2005;233:1091–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]