PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2587068
NIHMSID: NIHMS71682

Smokers with the CHRNA Lung Cancer-Associated Variants are Exposed to Higher Levels of Nicotine Equivalents and a Carcinogenic Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamine

Abstract

A locus at 15q24/15q25.1, which includes the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor A subunits 3 and 5 (CHRNA3, CHRNA5) genes, has recently been associated with lung cancer risk, self-reported number of cigarettes smoked per day and a nicotine-dependence scale. It is not clear whether the association with lung cancer is direct or mediated through differences in smoking behavior. We used urinary biomarkers to test whether two linked lung cancer risk variants in CHRNA3 (rs1051730) and CHRNA5 (rs16969968) are associated with intensity of smoking and exposure to a tobacco-specific carcinogenic nitrosamine per cigarette dose. We studied 819 smokers and found that carriers of these variants extract a greater amount of nicotine (p=0.003) and are exposed to a higher internal dose of NNK (p=0.03) per cigarette than non-carriers. Thus, smokers who carry the CHRNA3 and A5 variants are expected to be at increased risk for lung cancer, compared to smokers who do not carry these alleles even if they smoked the same number of cigarettes. Number of cigarettes per day, even if it could be accurately assessed, is not an adequate measure of smoking dose.

INTRODUCTION

Three whole-genome association studies (GWAS) recently identified a region of strong linkage disequilibrium on the long arm of chromosome 15 as being a susceptibility locus for lung cancer. The most likely candidate genes in this region are those that encode subunits of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor A (CHRNA3 and CHRNA5). The conclusions from the three studies differed on whether the link to lung cancer is direct or mediated through differences in smoking behavior. Previous reports had strongly associated these two genes with self-assessed nicotine dependence (1,2). The GWAS by Thorgeirsson et al. (3) confirmed these results by agnostically associating SNPs at 15q24/15q25.1 with self-reported number of cigarettes smoked per day and a nicotine-dependence scale. The other two GWAS by Amos et al. (4) and Hung et al. (5) also considered the lifetime smoking history of their cases and controls but found little evidence that this locus influences smoking behavior. Thus, these authors concluded that the association was primarily with lung cancer. Because the association of smoking with this disease is very strong, it is difficult to detect any residual independent association with a gene variant that primarily acts through increasing exposure to smoking. Here, we show with biomarkers that carriers of the risk variants in CHRNA3 and CHRNA5 smoke more intensively and are exposed to a higher internal dose of a carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamine per cigarette dose than non-carriers. These data are consistent with the overall increased lung cancer risk associated with this locus and suggest that number of cigarettes per day, even if it could be accurately assessed, is not an adequate surrogate for smoking dose when examining the independent effect of the 15q locus on lung cancer.

METHODS

We first studied 583 men and women of European, Japanese or Native Hawaiian ancestry who were long-term smokers of >10 cigarettes day. Participants were randomly selected among members of the Multiethnic Cohort Study (88%) or controls of several completed population-based case-control studies (12%) living on Oahu, Hawaii (6-8). Other inclusion criteria included having no previous history of invasive cancer, having both parents of Japanese or European ethnicity, or of any amount of Native Hawaiian ancestry, and smoking at least 10 cigarettes per day. These individuals were re-contacted for this study and instructed on how to record their food consumption for three days, as well as to collect a 12-hour, overnight urine sample at the end of those 3 days. A blood sample was then collected and a short questionnaire (including tobacco use during the previous three days) administered. The overall target sample size for this study was 100 in each sex and ethnic group. A total of 596 participants completed all aspects of the study, corresponding to a participation rate of 64.4%. Eight subjects were excluded for reporting to smoke fewer than the required 10 cigarettes per day during data collection, and 5 were excluded for missing covariate.

Subjects were genotyped for the synonymous variant rs1051730 in exon 5 of CHRNA3 and the non-synonymous variant rs16969968 in CHRNA5, the candidate SNPs the most likely to be causal in the 15q region associated with lung cancer in the three published GWAS (3-5). DNA was extracted from lymphocytes and the two variants were genotyped with the TaqMan allele discrimination assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The genotype frequencies were consistent with Hardy Weinberg equilibrium in each ethnic group (p>0.05). Concordance rate across the ~10% blinded duplicate samples genotyped with the study samples was 100%. The genotyping call rate was 99%. The frequency of the T allele for rs1051730 was 0.34 in European Americans, 0.19 in Native Hawaiians and 0.03 in Japanese Americans. The corresponding frequencies of the A allele for rs16969968 were 0.34, 0.20 and 0.03.

To access total nicotine, and hence tobacco smoke exposure, the urinary concentration of the sum of nicotine and 5 nicotine metabolites was determined. The sum of these 6 compounds, which account for 75−95% of the nicotine dose is referred to as nicotine equivalents and is considered the most comprehensive measure of exposure to nicotine (11). Specifically we measured the molar concentrations of total nicotine (free plus nicotine N-glucuronide), total cotinine (free plus cotinine N-glucuronide), total trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (3-HC) (free plus 3-HC N- and O-glucuronide), as well as a metabolite of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and its detoxification product NNAL-glucuronide (NNAL-Gluc), in the 12-hour urine. Nicotine metabolites were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and nicotine equivalents calculated as the sum of the molarity of total nicotine, total cotinine and total 3-HC. NNK metabolites were measured by GC with nitrosamine selective detection (GC-TEA) (9,10). Based on 65 blind duplicate pairs analyzed with the study samples for total nicotine and total cotinine, and 6 pairs for total 3HC, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.98, 0.96 and 0.62, respectively. NNK metabolites were determined as described with slight modifications (12).

We sought to replicate findings from the Hawaii study in two studies conducted at the University of Minnesota (UMN) that collected first morning urine. UMN Study 1 (UMN-1) included 99 participants (only 2 of which were non-white) in a clinical trial [the Tobacco Reduction Intervention Program (TRIP) Study] which recruited smokers of more than 14 cigarette/day and aged 18−70 years, who were interested in reducing cigarette use in the next 30 days (13). UMN Study 2 (UMN-2) included 137 smokers (118 European Americans, 15 African Americans and 4 Asian/Pacific Islanders). Smokers of 10−40 “light” cigarettes (0.7−1.0 mg nicotine/cigarette)/day, aged 18−70, who were interested in quitting smoking were recruited via advertisement. To be eligible for both UMN studies, smokers had to: a) be in good physical health; b) have no contraindication to nicotine replacement therapy; c) be in good psychiatric health; d) not be using other tobacco products; and e) not be pregnant or nursing. In both studies, the average number of cigarettes per day was computed from a daily diary and a first morning urine sample was collected from each subject. In these studies, the frequency of the rs16969968 A allele was 0.35 in European Americans and 0.10 in African Americans. The genotype frequencies were consistent with Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (African Americans, p>0.05; Caucasians, p=0.01). Concordance rates across the ~15% blinded duplicate samples genotyped were 97−100% and the genotyping call rate was 100%.

A square-root transformation was used for nicotine equivalents to achieve normal distribution. The sum of NNK metabolites was log-transformed. Least-square means for these two variables were computed for each genotype using the general linear model (GLM) procedure in SAS 9.0 (SAS, Inc. Cary, NC) adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, cigarettes per day and body mass index, and further for nicotine equivalents. In the pooled-analysis, an adjustment variable for study was included. Tests of interaction were conducted between genotype and study to identify modifying effects, but were not statistically significant and, therefore, were not included in the final models. Tests for significance were two-tailed with an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Main characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 1. In the Hawaii Study, we found that subjects with the CHRNA3 T allele or the CHRNA5 A allele had a higher age-, sex-, race-adjusted mean nicotine equivalents with a dominant genetic effect (Table 2). Adjustment for other determinants of nicotine equivalents, particularly, number of cigarettes per day, attenuated this association only slightly, indicating that carriers of the T or A allele are exposed to higher levels of nicotine per cigarette dose. The mean sum of the urinary NNK metabolites (NNAL+ NNAL-Gluc) also increased with the number of T and A alleles, even after adjusting for potential confounders. These associations were significant in each sex and in European Americans for the A allele. The T and A alleles were less common in Japanese Americans (3%) and Native Hawaiians (~19%) than European Americans (34%) and, thus, the power was lower in these groups.

Table 1
Main Characteristics* of Participants by Study
Table 2
Geometric Means (95% Confidence Intervals) for Nicotine Equivalents and NNK Internal Dose by CHRNA3 and CHRNA5 Genotype in the Hawaii Study

The results from the UMN studies are shown in Table 3. Similar increasing trends in the mean nicotine equivalents and total NNAL were observed with the number of CHRNA5 A alleles in the these replication data sets, although the differences in the means did not reach statistical significance. Because there was no heterogeneity across studies, we combined the three data sets to compute mean nicotine equivalents and total NNAL by CHRNA5 genotype adjusting for cigarettes per day using all subjects. Differences in mean nicotine equivalents and total NNAL were observed, with p-values that were as strong as those for the Hawaii study (Table 3).

Table 3
Geometric Means (95% Confidence Intervals) for Nicotine Equivalents and Total NNK Exposure by CHRNA5 Genotype in Two UMN studies and in All Studies Combined

DISCUSSION

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes code for proteins that form receptors present in neuronal and other tissues, such as alveolar epithelial cells and pulmonary neuroendocrine cells, and bind to nicotine (14). Sequence variants in this cluster of genes on chromosome 15 have been associated with increased (self-reported) cigarette dose and nicotine dependence (2). Our study, which uses nicotine equivalents as a more accurate reflection of tobacco smoke exposure than self reported cigarettes per day, further indicates that carriers of these variants smoke more intensively, resulting in higher exposures to nicotine, to NNK and most likely to other tobacco smoke carcinogens.

NNK is a tobacco-specific nitrosamine that has been shown to be an effective pulmonary carcinogen in every animal species tested (15). A total dose of only 6 mg/kg NNK, administered by subcutaneous injection over a period of twenty weeks, induced a significant incidence of lung tumors in rats (16). NNK given in the drinking water to rats at a concentration of 1 ppm for 105 weeks caused a significant incidence of lung tumors, and similar treatment of rats with 5 ppm of NNK or its metabolite NNAL induced lung tumors in more than 85% of the rats (17). A smoker is exposed to an estimated 0.5 mg NNK per kg body weight in 30 years of smoking (18). The major mechanism by which NNK causes lung cancer is through DNA adduct formation resulting in mutations in critical growth control genes, such as K-ras (15). The strong parallels that exist in mechanisms of NNK carcinogenesis between rodents and humans led the International Agency for Research on Cancer to classify NNK as “carcinogenic to humans” (18). Thus, our data indicate that smokers who carry the CHRNA3 or A5 variant are expected to be at increased risk of lung cancer, compared to smokers who do not carry these alleles -- even if they smoke the same number of cigarettes -- because they smoke more intensely and are, therefore, exposed to greater levels of carcinogens.

We also note that the population frequencies of these variants suggest that they are unlikely to explain, by themselves, the ethnic/racial differences in lung cancer risk among smokers that we have documented in these populations, since risk is higher among Native Hawaiians and lower in Japanese Americans, compared to European Americans (19,20).

Our study does not address the possibility that the CHRNA3/4 SNPs exert an independent effect on lung cancer risk, as it has been suggested based on the role these receptors may play in mediating the angiogenic and tumor growth effects of NNK (5). However, these effects may not be critical since similar receptor-mediated effects would be expected from nicotine (which is not a carcinogen), the concentration of which is considerably greater (x 10,000) than NNK. Nevertheless, our data clearly indicate that a simple adjustment for number of cigarettes per day is inadequate to control for smoking dose in studies examining the independent association of these variants with smoking-associated lung cancer.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by grants R01 CA85997 and P50 DA13333. We thank Elizabeth Thompson and Nicole Thomson for carrying out the analysis of total nicotine, total cotinine, and total trans 3'-hydroxycotinine, and Annette Jones and Ann Seifried for conducting the genotyping.

References

1. Bierut LJ, Madden PA, Breslau N, et al. Novel genes identified in a high-density genome wide association study for nicotine dependence. Human Mol Genet. 2007;16:24–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Saccone SF, Hinrichs AL, Saccone NL, et al. Cholinergic nicotinic receptor genes implicated in a nicotine dependence association study targeting 348 candidate genes with 3713 SNPs. Human Mol Genet. 2007;16:36–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Thorgeirsson TE, Geller F, Sulem P, et al. A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature. 2008;452:638–42. [PubMed]
4. Amos CI, Wu X, Broderick P, et al. Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nat Genet. 2008;40:616–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Hung RJ, McKay JD, Gaborieau V, et al. A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature. 2008;452:633–7. [PubMed]
6. Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:346–57. [PubMed]
7. Le Marchand L, Sivaraman L, Pierce L, et al. Associations of CYP1A1, GSTM1, and CYP2E1 polymorphisms with lung cancer suggest cell type specificities to tobacco carcinogen. Cancer Res. 1998;58:4858–63. [PubMed]
8. Luchtenborg M, White KK, Wilkens L, Kolonel LN, Le Marchand L. Smoking and colorectal cancer: different effects by type of cigarettes? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1341–7. [PubMed]
9. Hecht SS, et al. Quantitation of urinary metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen after smoking cessation. Cancer Res. 1999;59:590–6. [PubMed]
10. Hecht SS, Carmella SG, Murphy SE. Effects of watercress consumption on urinary metabolites of nicotine in smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:907–13. [PubMed]
11. Scherer G, Engl J, Urban M, Gilch G, Janket D, Riedel K. Relationship between machine-derived smoke yields and biomarkers in cigarette smokers in Germany. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007;47:171–183. [PubMed]
12. Carmella SG, Han S, Fristad A, Yang Y, Hecht SS. Analysis of total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) in human urine. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers. Prev. 2003;12:1257–61. [PubMed]
13. Joseph AM, Hecht SS, Murphy SE, et al. Relationships between cigarette consumption and biomarkers of tobacco toxin exposure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;12:2963–8. [PubMed]
14. Minna JD. Nicotine exposure and bronchial epithelial cell nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:31–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Hecht SS. Progress and challenges in selected areas of tobacco carcinogenesis. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21:160–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Belinsky SA, Foley JF, White CM, Anderson MW, Maronpot RR. Dose-response relationship between O6-methylguanine formation in Clara cells and induction of pulmonary neoplasia in the rat by 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone. Cancer Res. 1990;50:3771–80. [PubMed]
17. Rivenson A, Hoffmann D, Prokopczyk B, Amin S, Hecht SS. Induction of lung and exocrine pancreas tumors in F344 rats by tobacco-specific and Areca-derived N-nitrosamines. Cancer Res. 1988;48:6912–7. [PubMed]
18. International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol. 89. IARC; Lyon, FR: 2007. Smokeless tobacco and tobacco-specific nitrosamines.
19. Le Marchand L, Wilkens LR, Kolonel LN. Ethnic differences in the lung cancer risk associated with smoking. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevm. 1992;1:103–7. [PubMed]
20. Haiman CA, Stram DO, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Le Marchand L. Ethnic and racial differences in the smoking-related risk of lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:333–42. [PubMed]