PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 September 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2583403
NIHMSID: NIHMS70676

Increased oxidative stress and antioxidant expression in mouse keratinocytes following exposure to paraquat

Abstract

Paraquat (1,1’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium) is a widely used herbicide known to induce skin toxicity. This is thought to be due to oxidative stress resulting from the generation of cytotoxic reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) during paraquat redox cycling. The skin contains a diverse array of antioxidant enzymes which protect against oxidative stress including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione peroxidase-1 (GPx-1), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), metallothionein-2 (MT-2), and glutathione-S-transferases (GST). In the present studies we compared paraquat redox cycling in primary cultures of undifferentiated and differentiated mouse keratinocytes and determined if this was associated with oxidative stress and altered expression of antioxidant enzymes. We found that paraquat readily undergoes redox cycling in both undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes, generating superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide as well as increased protein oxidation which was greater in differentiated cells. Paraquat treatment also resulted in increased expression of HO-1, Cu,Zn-SOD, catalase, GSTP1, GSTA3 and GSTA4. However, no major differences in expression of these enzymes were evident between undifferentiated and differentiated cells. In contrast, expression of GSTA1-2 was significantly greater in differentiated relative to undifferentiated cells after paraquat treatment. No changes in expression of MT-2, Mn-SOD, GPx-1, GSTM1 or the microsomal GST’s, mGST1, mGST2 and mGST3, were observed in response to paraquat. These data demonstrate that paraquat induces oxidative stress in keratinocytes leading to increased expression of antioxidant genes. These intracellular proteins may be important in protecting the skin from paraquatmediated cytotoxicity.

Keywords: paraquat, glutathione-S-transferase, MAPEG, skin, oxidative stress

Introduction

Occupational exposures to the herbicide paraquat (1,1’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium) has been associated with a variety of skin diseases including contact dermatitis, premalignant lesions and squamous cell carcinomas (Wang et al., 1987; Vilaplana et al., 1993; Jee et al., 1995; Anderson and Scerri, 2003). Paraquat readily penetrates the skin, and toxicity is thought to result from the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) through redox cycling (Bus et al., 1974; Bus et al., 1976; Bus and Gibson, 1984; Krall et al., 1988). Previous studies have shown that paraquat redox cycling is a primary mechanism of oxidative injury in many cell types including brain, liver, kidney and lung (Tomita, 1991; Bonneh-Barkay et al., 2005). During redox cycling, paraquat undergoes a single electron reduction to form a paraquat radical via NAD(P)H oxidase activity (see Fig. 1A for summary) (Bus and Gibson, 1982). The paraquat radical is rapidly oxidized back to the parent compound with the concomitant transfer of the extra electron to molecular oxygen, forming superoxide anion (Bus and Gibson, 1982). Subsequent reduction of superoxide anion generates hydrogen peroxide and, potentially, highly toxic hydroxyl radicals (Darr and Fridovich, 1994). Production of these ROI leads to intracellular oxidative stress and damage to cellular macromolecules including DNA, lipids and protein (Trouba et al., 2002). Functional groups on proteins are particularly susceptible to oxidation resulting in the formation of carbonyls which can lead to adduct generation with associated altered or loss of protein function (Dean et al., 1997a; Levine, 2002).

Figure 1
Summary of paraquat redox cycling and detoxification of ROI by cellular antioxidants

Cellular antioxidants play a key role in the removal or detoxification of ROI, which is essential for preventing oxidative damage (Yu, 1994). The epidermis of the skin contains a complex enzymatic antioxidant defense system (Darr and Fridovich, 1994) (see Fig. 1B for ROI generating and detoxification pathways). This system includes enzymes that act directly to detoxify ROI such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), as well as ROI scavengers such as heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), metallothionein-2 (MT-2) (Maines and Panahian, 2001; Coyle et al., 2002) and glutathione metabolizing enzymes such as the glutathione S-transferases (GST) (Hayes and McLellan, 1999). The skin’s response to oxidative stress is multi-faceted which is due in part to the fact that it is comprised of proliferating basal keratinocytes with overlying layers of cells in various stages of terminal differentiation. Increased levels of protein oxidation and lipid peroxidation following exposure to oxidants such as ozone or ultraviolet radiation have been detected in the outermost layers of the epidermis of both mouse (Thiele et al., 1997) and human skin (Theile et al., 1999). The differentiation process may, therefore play a role in both the level of oxidative damage and the antioxidant response of epidermal keratinocytes.

In the present studies, we compared paraquat redox cycling in primary cultures of undifferentiated and differentiated mouse keratinocytes. We also determined if paraquat-induced oxidative stress in these cells was associated with alterations in antioxidant expression. We found that paraquat is readily metabolized by both cell types, generating ROI, and that this results in cellular protein oxidation. In both undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes, paraquat-induced oxidative stress resulted in upregulation of HO-1, SOD, catalase and several GST enzymes. Differentiated cells were more responsive to paraquat than undifferentiated cells. Increased oxidative stress in differentiating epidermal keratinocytes may be an important mechanism of paraquat-induced skin toxicity.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and reagents

M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase was from Promega (Madison, WI) and collagen IV was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). The Western Lightning enhanced chemiluminescence kit was from Perkin Elmer Life Sciences, Inc. (Boston, MA) and precast polyacrylamide gels were from Pierce Biotechnology, Inc. (Rockford, IL). Anti- HO-1 antibodies were purchased from Assay Designs (Ann Arbor, MI), anti-catalase antibodies were from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) and Cu,Zn-SOD antibodies from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies to keratin-1, keratin-10 and filaggrin were obtained from Covance Research Products (Berkley, CA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, detergent-compatible protein assay reagents and the Silver Stain Plus kit were from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA). SYBR Green Master Mix and other PCR reagents were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). All cell culture media, 10-acetyl-3, 7-dihydroxyphenoxazine (Amplex Red) and 3H-phenoxazine (resorufin) were from Invitrogen Corp (Carlsbad, CA). Paraquat, protease inhibitor cocktail, NADPH and all other chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Cells

Primary keratinocytes were isolated and cultured from C57Bl/6J neonatal mice as previously described (Hager et al., 1999). To initiate an experiment, cells were grown on collagen IV-coated plates and cultured in serum-free low calcium (0.05 mM) Keratinocyte Growth Medium to maintain their undifferentiated phenotype. Differentiation was induced by the addition of calcium (0.15 mM) to the culture medium (Yuspa et al., 1988). Differentiation was confirmed by morphological changes and expression of differentiation markers including keratin 1, keratin 10 and filaggrin, as determined by Western blotting (Yuspa et al., 1989). In some experiments, primary C57Bl/6J keratinocytes were purchased from the Yale University Cell Culture Facility (New Haven, CT).

Assays for ROI production

Superoxide anion was quantified by the formation of 2-hydroxyethidium from dihydroethidine as described by Zhao et al. (Zhao et al., 2005). Briefly, a reaction mix containing cell lysates (150 µg/µl protein), paraquat (100 µM), NADPH (0.5 mM) and dihydroethidine (40 µM) was incubated for one h at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of an equal volume of ice-cold methanol. The samples were then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatants collected. 2-hydroxyethidium was quantified using a Shimadzu HPLC (Kyoto, Japan) fitted with a Luna C18 column (250 mm × 2.0 mm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) and a Shimadzu RF-535 fluorescence detector with excitation and emission set at 510 and 595 nm, respectively. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and was run by a linear increase of acetonitrile from 10% to 40% in 35 min at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min.

The formation of hydrogen peroxide was quantified using the Amplex Red fluorescence assay as previously described (Vetrano et al., 2005). Briefly, reactions were run in 96-well microtiter plates at 37° C and contained 10 µM Amplex Red reagent, 50 µM NADPH and 130–150 µg/µl of cell protein lysate in a total volume of 50 µl. The detection of the fluorescent product, resorufin, was recorded every 2.5 min for 30 min using an HTS 7000 Plus BioAssay Reader (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA). In some experiments, the inhibitors dicoumarol (100 µM) or diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) (10 µM) were added directly to the reaction mix.

Assays for NADPH metabolism and formation of paraquat radical

The generation of paraquat radicals and depletion of NADPH in reaction mixtures were quantified in 0.5-ml cuvettes using a Lambda 20 UV/visible spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Paraquat radicals were quantified by increases in absorbance at 604 nm (Tampo et al., 1999) and were recorded on the spectrophotometer by scanning at 1 nm/s, recording at 1-nm intervals, and repeating the scan at 2.5-min intervals for 60 min. Since paraquat radicals are unstable in the presence of oxygen (Bus and Gibson, 1982), experiments were run in filled cuvettes covered tightly with Parafilm to create anaerobic conditions. The formation of the radical was confirmed by the appearance of the blue-violet paraquat radical (Michaelis and Hill, 1933). NADPH metabolism was assayed by monitoring decreases in absorbance at 340 nm and were recorded every 2.5 min for 3 h.

Western blotting

Cell lysates were prepared using an SDS-lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-base and 1% SDS, pH 7.6 supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail consisting of 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin, bestatin hydrochloride, N-(trans-epoxysuccinyl)-L-leucine 4-guanidinobutylamide, EDTA and leupeptin). Lysates containing 20 µg protein were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After incubating the membranes in blocking buffer (5% dry milk Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C, the membranes were incubated for 2 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Protein immunoreactive bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents. Loading of equal amounts of protein was confirmed by silver staining of the gels.

Protein oxidation assay

Protein oxidation was determined by quantifying the formation of carbonyl groups on protein side chains (Stadtman, 1993; Chevion et al., 2000; Levine, 2002; Dalle-Donne et al., 2006) using an OxyBlot Protein Oxidation Detection Kit (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA ). Briefly, cell lysates were treated with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine to derivatize the carbonyl groups on proteins to 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone-tagged products. Nonderivatized samples were used as a control. Samples were separated on pre-cast 4–20% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with primary antibodies to dinitrophenylhydrazone-modified carbonyl groups, followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein expression was visualized using ECL reagents and loading of equal amounts of protein was confirmed by silver staining of the gels.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

RNA was isolated using Tri Reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The RNA was converted to cDNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase. The cDNA was diluted 1:10 in RNase-DNase-free water for PCR analysis. For each gene to be tested, a standard curve composed of a serial dilution of a pool of the cDNA from the samples was used as a reference. All values were normalized to β-actin (n = 3, ± SE). The undifferentiated control was given a value of one and the values for both the undifferentiated and differentiated samples were calculated relative to this control sample. Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI Prism 7900 Sequence Detection System using 96-well optical reaction plates. SYBR-Green was used for detection of fluorescent signal and the standard curve method was used for relative quantification analysis. The primer sequences for the genes were generated using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) and the oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (Coralville, IA). The forward and reverse primer sequences (5’→3’) were: β-actin, TCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTACGA and GGATGCCACAGGATTCCATACCCA; catalase, ACCAGGGCATCAAAAACTTG and GCCCTGAAGCTTTTTGTCAG; GSTA1-2, CAGAGTCCGGAAGATTTGGA and CAAGGCAGTCTTGGCTTCTC; GSTA3, GCAAGCCTTGCCAAGATCAA and GGCAGGGAAGTAACGGTTCC; GSTA4, CCCTTGGTTGAAATCGATGG and GAGGATGGCCCTGGTCTGT; GSTM1, CCTACATGAAGAGTAGCCGCTACAT and TAGTGAGTGCCCGTGTAGCAA; GSTP1, CCTTGGCCGCTCTTTGG and GGCCTTCACGTAGTCATTCTTACC; GPx-1, GGTTCGAGCCCAATTTTACA and TCGATGTCGATGGTACGAAA; HO-1, CCTCACTGGCAGGAAATCATC and CCTCGTGGAGACGCTTTACATA; MT-2, TGCAGGAAGTACATTTGCATTGTT and TTTTCTTGCAGGAAGTACATTTGC; mGST1, GCTTTGGCAAGGGAGAGAATG and CCTTCTCGTCAGTGCGAACA; mGST2, TGCAGCCTGTCTGGGTCTC and CAGAAATACTTGTGACGGGCG; mGST3, GGAGGTGTACCCTCCCTTCC and TGGTAAACACCTCCCACCGT; Cu,Zn-SOD, ACCAGTGCAGGACCTCATTTTAA and TCTCCAACATGCCTCTCTTCATC; and Mn-SOD, CACATTAACGCGCAGATCATG and CCAGAGCCTCGTGGTACTTCTC.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences between the means were determined using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Paraquat-induced redox cycling in keratinocytes

In initial experiments, we compared paraquat redox cycling in undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes by quantifying the generation of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide. Paraquat was found to stimulate the formation of superoxide anion in keratinocyte cell lysates as detected by the generation of 2-hydroxyethidium from dihydroethidine (Fig. 2). This was inhibited by superoxide dismutase (350 U/ml) demonstrating that the ROI was in fact superoxide anion. No major differences were observed between undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes. We also found that paraquat stimulated hydrogen peroxide production by keratinocytes in a time- and concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3, upper panels). Greater activity was noted in differentiated cells, when compared to undifferentiated cells (Fig. 3, lower panels). The accumulation of hydrogen peroxide was blocked by catalase (10 U/ml), but not superoxide dismutase (400 U/ml) (data not shown), confirming the specificity of the assay. Paraquat redox cycling and ROI formation is dependent on oxidation of NAD(P)H to NAD(P)+ (Bus et al., 1974). We found that NADPH was rapidly metabolized to NADP+ in our enzyme assays; however, no major differences were noted between undifferentiated and differentiated cells (Fig. 4). Diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) has been shown to effectively suppress the activity of many FAD reducing enzymes (Riganti et al., 2004) including NADPH oxidoreductase (O'Donnell et al., 1993). DPI (10 µM) was found to inhibit paraquat-induced hydrogen peroxide production in both undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes (Fig 5), indicating that paraquat redox cycling is catalyzed by FAD-dependent NADPH oxidoreductases. Previous studies have shown that NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), an FAD-containing oxidase, can participate in redox cycling reactions (Kishi et al., 2002). Dicoumarol, an inhibitor of NQO1 (Asher et al., 2006), was found to suppress paraquat redox cycling in both undifferentiated and differentiated cells (Fig. 5).

Figure 2
Paraquat redox cycling leads to the production of superoxide anion
Figure 3
Redox cycling of paraquat by keratinocytes
Figure 4
Effects of paraquat on NADPH metabolism
Figure 5
Effects of inhibitors on paraquat redox cycling

During redox cycling paraquat is reduced to a radical (Fig. 1) which immediately transfers an electron to oxygen generating superoxide anion and the parent paraquat molecule (Bus and Gibson, 1984). Under anaerobic conditions, the paraquat radical is stable (Winterbourn, 1981). Figure 6 shows that lysates from differentiated keratinocytes readily generated the paraquat radical once anaerobic conditions were established. The formation of the paraquat radical was time- and concentration-dependent (Fig. 6 inset and not shown). The presence of the paraquat radical was confirmed by the appearance of a blue-violet color in the reaction mix (Tampo et al., 1999). No major differences were observed in paraquat radical formation between undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes (not shown).

Figure 6
Generation of paraquat radicals

Effects of paraquat on oxidative stress in keratinocytes

The oxidation of proteins by ROI is known to be an important marker of cellular oxidative stress (Dean et al., 1997b; Davies, 2005). In both undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes, constitutive levels of oxidized proteins were detectable. In particular, two oxidized proteins with molecular masses of 59 and 68 kDa were evident (Fig. 7). Lower levels of proteins with molecular masses of 75 and 97 kDa were also apparent and paraquat treatment of the cells resulted in an increase in oxidation of these proteins. Additionally, a band of oxidized protein at 43 kDa appeared after paraquat treatment in both undifferentiated and differentiated cells.

Figure 7
Cellular oxidative stress in paraquat-treated keratinocytes

It is well recognized that oxidative stress upregulates expression of antioxidant enzymes (Franco et al., 1999; Scandalios, 2005). In both undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes, paraquat treatment increased mRNA expression of HO-1, Cu,Zn-SOD and catalase approximately 5–8 fold (Fig. 8, upper panel). Paraquat treatment also resulted in increased protein expression of these antioxidants (Fig. 8, lower panel). No major differences in expression of the antioxidants were noted between paraquat-treated undifferentiated and differentiated cells. In contrast, paraquat had no effect on expression of Mn-SOD, GPx-1 or MT-2 (Fig. 8, upper panel). Interestingly, we also found that the differentiation process was associated with increased constitutive expression of HO-1, Cu,Zn-SOD and catalase protein.

Figure 8
Effects of paraquat on expression of antioxidant enzymes

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzymes play a central role in the elimination of oxidized macromolecules and xenobiotics in cells through glutathione conjugation (Hayes et al., 2004). The major cytosolic members of the GST superfamily are the alpha (GSTA), mu (GSTM) and pi (GSTP) families which are important in detoxification of lipid and protein peroxidation products (Hayes and Strange, 1995; Hayes and McLellan, 1999). The three microsomal GST enzymes (mGST1, mGST2 and mGST3) are members of the membrane-associated proteins in the eicosanoid and glutathione metabolism (MAPEG) family of enzymes (Jakobsson et al., 1999; Jakobsson et al., 2000) and are also important in removing oxidation products (Mosialou et al., 1995). We found that mRNA expression of the alpha family of GST’s was markedly increased in differentiated and undifferentiated keratinocytes in response to paraquat treatment. Specifically, GSTA1-2 was increased 40–50-fold, while GSTA4 increased 20–25-fold (Fig. 9, left panel). Paraquat also stimulated GSTA3 expression 9–13-fold (Fig. 9A), while GSTP1 levels increased 3–4-fold in both cell types (Fig. 9, right panel). Increases in GSTA1-2, but not in GSTA4, GSTA3 or GSTP1, were significantly greater in differentiated cells when compared to undifferentiated cells. No major changes were observed in GSTM1, mGST1, mGST2 or mGST3 expression following paraquat treatment in either undifferentiated and differentiated cells.

Figure 9
Effects of paraquat on keratinocyte expression of glutathione-S-transferases

Discussion

The present studies show that paraquat is reduced to a radical in keratinocytes during a redox cycling reaction, and that oxidation of this radical generates superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide. Moreover, in intact keratinocytes, paraquat redox cycling leads to protein oxidation. These findings are novel and suggest a potential mechanism mediating paraquat-induced injury to the skin. Of particular interest was our observation that paraquat-induced protein oxidation was greater in differentiated keratinocytes, when compared to undifferentiated cells, and that this is associated with increased hydrogen peroxide formation. These results suggest that differentiated keratinocytes may be more susceptible to oxidative stress. This idea is consistent with findings of increased oxidative stress in suprabasal layers of the epidermis following exposure to UVB light (Theile et al., 1999; Sander et al., 2002). In contrast, we noted that generally similar amounts of superoxide anion were generated in undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes. It is possible that differentiated cells metabolize superoxide anion more rapidly than undifferentiated cells. This is supported by our findings that differentiated cells expressed greater constitutive levels of Cu,Zn-SOD. Although differentiated cells also expressed more catalase, this was apparently not sufficient to metabolize hydrogen peroxide during paraquat redox cycling in these cells, when compared to undifferentiated cells. At least four constitutively oxidized proteins with molecular masses of 59, 68, 75 and 97 kDa were identified in the keratinocytes. It is well recognized that cells continuously generate basal levels of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide from both mitochondrial and extramitochondrial sources (Darr and Fridovich, 1994), and it is likely that these ROI are responsible for generating the observed oxidized proteins. This is in accord with our findings of enhanced oxidation of these same proteins following paraquat treatment. Paraquat also induced oxidation of an additional 43 kDa protein in both differentiated and undifferentiated keratinocytes. At the present time, the identity of the oxidized target proteins in the cells is not known. Since the 43 kDa protein is selectively oxidized following paraquat treatment, we speculate that it plays a critical role in mediating the biological actions of paraquat.

Previous studies have demonstrated that redox cycling of paraquat occurs via the actions of oxidoreductases including cytochrome P450 reductase and thioredoxin reductase (Day et al., 1999; Gray et al., 2007). These are flavin-containing monooxygenases that are inhibited by DPI. In accord with this, we found that DPI also inhibited paraquat-mediated redox cycling in keratinocyte lysates. However, the redox cycling activity was simultaneously suppressed by dicoumarol, an inhibitor of the FAD-containing enzyme, NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1). Although these findings suggest that paraquat may redox cycle with this enzyme, this would be surprising since NQO1 catalyzes an obligate two-electron reduction (Chen et al., 2000). It should be noted that dicoumarol also inhibits other enzymes including mitochondrial complexes II, III and IV (Gonzalez-Aragon et al., 2007). Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that dicoumarol inhibits other DPI-sensitive one electron oxidoreductases in keratinocytes that mediate redox cycling of paraquat.

Increased oxidative stress in cells is associated with altered expression of antioxidant enzymes which function to limit cytotoxicity (Adler et al., 1999; Droge, 2002; Scandalios, 2005). Both undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes were found to respond to paraquat-induced oxidative stress by upregulating the expression of several key antioxidant enzymes including Cu,Zn-SOD, HO-1 and catalase. Transgenic mouse studies have shown that antioxidant enzymes such as Cu,Zn-SOD, as well as GPx-1, are required for the prevention of paraquat-induced oxidative damage (de Haan et al., 1998; Van Remmen et al., 2004), and that their overexpression offers protection from injury (Thiruchelvam et al., 2005). Interestingly, we found differential effects of paraquat on expression of Cu,Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD. Thus, while Cu,Zn-SOD was readily induced in the cells following paraquat treatment, Mn-SOD remained unchanged. Similar results have been described in paraquat-treated fibroblasts (Kelner and Bagnell, 1990), and in keratinocytes exposed to UVB (Sasaki et al., 1997). Cu,Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD are known to be regulated by distinct mechanisms (Zelko et al., 2002). Moreover, Cu,Zn-SOD is cytosolic, while Mn-SOD is restricted to the mitochondrial matrix and inner membrane (Fridovich, 1978). Presumably, paraquat generates superoxide anion in the cytosolic compartment of the cells and localized oxidative stress stimulates expression of Cu,Zn-SOD.

Paraquat-induced increases in HO-1 expression were also observed in undifferentiated and differentiated cells. HO-1, like Cu,Zn-SOD, is upregulated in cultured skin and lung cells in response to exposure to oxidants such as ozone (Valacchi et al., 2004), sodium arsenite (Applegate et al., 1991) and UVA (Keyse and Tyrrell, 1990). This is thought to be central in antioxidant defense and is supported by findings that HO-1 knockout mice exhibit increased ROI production and enhanced mortality (Poss and Tonegawa, 1997). As observed with Cu,Zn-SOD and catalase, constitutive expression of HO-1 was increased in differentiated keratinocytes when compared to undifferentiated cells, and this may be important in protecting suprabasal layers of the skin from oxidative stress. Catalase expression was also induced by paraquat in both undifferentiated and differentiated keratinocytes. Increased catalase expression has been observed in skin following UVA exposure (Fuchs et al., 1989), and catalase overexpression in both cultured keratinocytes and mice provides protection from hydrogen peroxide-induced damage (Chen et al., 2004; Shim et al., 2005), as well as UVB-mediated apoptosis (Rezvani et al., 2006). Increased expression of these important antioxidants is a key adaptive response to protein oxidation as a result of paraquat redox cycling and represents a mechanism to protect keratinocytes against further oxidative stress.

Of particular interest was our finding that paraquat treatment altered expression of several major glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzymes. A major function of both cytosolic and microsomal GST enzymes is conjugation of glutathione to oxidized cellular macromolecules in order to facilitate their elimination and limit tissue injury. Although all GST enzymes conjugate glutathione, each GST family has preferred substrates. GSTA enzymes have been shown to break lipid peroxidation chain reactions through the removal of hydroperoxides and aldehydes generated during oxidative stress (Hayes and McLellan, 1999; Yang et al., 2002). This GSTA preference for lipid peroxidation products may explain the striking increases in GSTA1-2 and GSTA4, as well as GSTA3 that we observed in keratinocytes. Our findings are consistent with previous work showing that overexpression of GSTA1 protects against hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage in retinal pigment cells (Liang et al., 2005). We also noted significantly greater expression of GSTA1-2 in response to paraquat in differentiated keratinocytes, when compared to undifferentiated cells. Genetic polymorphisms in the GSTA1 promoter have been associated with increased cancer incidence (Coles et al., 2001; Sweeney et al., 2003), and these polymorphisms may be involved in regulating GSTA1 gene expression and tumor development. The importance of GSTA4 activity in protection against paraquat-induced oxidative stress has also been noted in GSTA4 null mice (Engle et al., 2004). Higher concentrations of lipid peroxidation products are detected in the livers of these mice after injection of paraquat, and the mice exhibit a greater mortality relative to wild-type controls. The lower induction of GSTP1, and lack of induction of GSTM1 in our cells may be due to the diminished roles that these enzyme families play in the detoxification of lipid peroxidation products (Berhane et al., 1994). Our results are generally similar to reports of changes in GST mRNA expression in lungs from mice treated with paraquat where increases in the GST alpha and pi families were detected (Ruiz-Laguna et al., 2005).

The microsomal GST (mGST) enzymes have been shown to exhibit glutathione peroxidase activity against lipid hydroperoxides that is similar to the cytosolic GSTA enzymes (Mosialou et al., 1995). However, in keratinocytes, expression of these enzymes was not altered by paraquat treatment. The mGSTs also appear to be important in the metabolism of lipid-derived inflammatory mediators (Hayes et al., 2004). Both mGST2 and mGST3 conjugate glutathione to leukotriene A4 to form leukotriene C4 (LTC4) (Jakobsson et al., 1997), while mGST1 co-localizes with leukotriene C4 synthase, and is inhibited by LTC4 (Bannenberg et al., 1999). Further studies are necessary to determine if the microsomal and cytosolic GST enzymes are regulated distinctly, and to elucidate their role in protecting cells from oxidative stress.

Our data show that paraquat readily induced oxidative stress in keratinocytes. Antioxidant therapy involving the administration of SOD or N-acetylcysteine (NAc) has been proposed as a potential treatment for paraquat poisoning. This approach, however, has met with mixed results. While initial studies suggested that NAc and Cu,Zn-SOD increased the survival of paraquat-treated animals (Yeh et al., 2006), subsequent work demonstrated that the protective effects of SOD were only evident when it was used in combination with Mn-SOD and glutathione (GSH) (Paller and Eaton, 1995). In the same study, Cu,Zn-SOD treatment alone enhanced oxidative injury, primarily due to the reactivity of the copper ions. In recent in vivo experiments, synthetic SOD analogs were shown to prevent paraquat-induced pulmonary oxidative damage without causing toxicity in mice (Day and Crapo, 1996). In mouse skin, topical application of antioxidant formulations including inhibitors of superoxide anion or alpha- and beta-carotenes reduced markers of oxidative stress caused by exposure to phorbol esters (Nakamura et al., 1998) or croton oil (Kim-Jun, 1993). At the present time, the use of antioxidants orally or topically for the treatment of paraquat toxicity is promising but requires additional studies to identify agents that penetrate the skin and retain biological activity.

In summary, we have shown that paraquat induces oxidative stress in primary cultures of undifferentiated and differentiated mouse keratinocytes by producing ROI via NADPH-dependent redox cycling. This leads to increased protein oxidation, particularly in differentiated cells, as well as upregulation of critical antioxidant enzymes including Cu,Zn-SOD, catalase, HO-1, GSTA1-2, GSTA3, GSTA4 and GSTP1. At the present time, the precise role of each of these antioxidants in the response of the skin to oxidative stress is unknown. The role of differentiation in regulating antioxidant enzyme expression, as well as in determining of how this process controls the responses of the skin to oxidative stress requires further investigation for a more complete understanding of the dermal toxicity of paraquat.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants CA100994, CA093798, GM034310, ES004738, ES005022 and by NJ State Commission on Cancer Research fellowship 05-2413-CCR-E0. This work was also funded in part by the National Institutes of Health CounterACT Program through the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (award #U54AR055073). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the federal government.

Abbreviations

DPI
diphenyleneiodonium
GST
glutathione S-transferase
GSTA
GST alpha
GSTM
GST mu
GSTP
GST pi
GPx-1
glutathione peroxidase-1
HO-1
heme oxygenase-1
Cu,Zn-SOD
copper-zinc superoxide dismutase
Mn-SOD
manganese superoxide dismutase
MT-2
metallothionein-2
NQO1
NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase-1
PBS
phosphate-buffered saline

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • Adler V, Yin Z, Tew KD, Ronai Z. Role of redox potential and reactive oxygen species in stress signaling. Oncogene. 1999;18:6104–6111. [PubMed]
  • Anderson KD, Scerri GV. A case of multiple skin cancers after occupational exposure to pesticides. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:1088–1089. [PubMed]
  • Applegate LA, Luscher P, Tyrrell RM. Induction of heme oxygenase: a general response to oxidant stress in cultured mammalian cells. Cancer Res. 1991;51:974–978. [PubMed]
  • Asher G, Dym O, Tsvetkov P, Adler J, Shaul Y. The crystal structure of NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 in complex with its potent inhibitor dicoumarol. Biochemistry. 2006;45:6372–6378. [PubMed]
  • Bannenberg G, Dahlen SE, Luijerink M, Lundqvist G, Morgenstern R. Leukotriene C4 is a tight-binding inhibitor of microsomal glutathione transferase-1. Effects of leukotriene pathway modifiers. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:1994–1999. [PubMed]
  • Berhane K, Widersten M, Engstrom A, Kozarich JW, Mannervik B. Detoxification of base propenals and other alpha, beta-unsaturated aldehyde products of radical reactions and lipid peroxidation by human glutathione transferases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:1480–1484. [PubMed]
  • Bonneh-Barkay D, Reaney SH, Langston WJ, Di Monte DA. Redox cycling of the herbicide paraquat in microglial cultures. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005;134:52–56. [PubMed]
  • Bus JS, Aust SD, Gibson JE. Superoxide- and singlet oxygen-catalyzed lipid peroxidation as a possible mechanism for paraquat (methyl viologen) toxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974;58:749–755. [PubMed]
  • Bus JS, Cagen SZ, Olgaard M, Gibson JE. A mechanism of paraquat toxicity in mice and rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1976;35:501–513. [PubMed]
  • Bus JS, Gibson JE. Mechanisms of superoxide radical-mediated toxicity. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1982;19:689–697. [PubMed]
  • Bus JS, Gibson JE. Paraquat: model for oxidant-initiated toxicity. Environ Health Perspect. 1984;55:37–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chen S, Wu K, Knox R. Structure-function studies of DT-diaphorase (NQO1) and NRH:quinone oxidoreductase (NQO2) Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;29:276–284. [PubMed]
  • Chen X, Liang H, Van Remmen H, Vijg J, Richardson A. Catalase transgenic mice: characterization and sensitivity to oxidative stress. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004;422:197–210. [PubMed]
  • Chevion M, Berenshtein E, Stadtman ER. Human studies related to protein oxidation: protein carbonyl content as a marker of damage. Free Radic Res. 2000;33:S99–S108. [PubMed]
  • Coles BF, Morel F, Rauch C, Huber WW, Yang M, Teitel CH, Green B, Lang NP, Kadlubar FF. Effect of polymorphism in the human glutathione S-transferase A1 promoter on hepatic GSTA1 and GSTA2 expression. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:663–669. [PubMed]
  • Coyle P, Philcox JC, Carey LC, Rofe AM. Metallothionein: the multipurpose protein. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002;59:627–647. [PubMed]
  • Dalle-Donne I, Aldini G, Carini M, Colombo R, Rossi R, Milzani A. Protein carbonylation, cellular dysfunction, and disease progression. J Cell. Mol. Med. 2006;10:389–406. [PubMed]
  • Darr D, Fridovich I. Free radicals in cutaneous biology. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102:671–675. [PubMed]
  • Davies MJ. The oxidative environment and protein damage. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2005;1703:93–109. [PubMed]
  • Day BJ, Crapo JD. A metalloporphyrin superoxide dismutase mimetic protects against paraquat-induced lung injury. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1996;140:94–100. [PubMed]
  • Day BJ, Patel M, Calavetta L, Chang LY, Stamler JS. A mechanism of paraquat toxicity involving nitric oxide synthase. PNAS USA. 1999;26:12760–12765. [PubMed]
  • de Haan JB, Bladier C, Griffiths P, Kelner M, O'Shea RD, Cheung NS, Bronson RT, Silvestro MJ, Wild S, Zheng SS, Beart PM, Hertzog PJ, Kola I. Mice with a homozygous null mutation for the most abundant glutathione peroxidase, Gpx1, show increased susceptibility to the oxidative stress-inducing agents paraquat and hydrogen peroxide. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:22528–22536. [PubMed]
  • Dean RT, Fu S, Stocker R, Davies MJ. Biochemistry and pathology of radical-mediated protein oxidation. Biochem J. 1997;324:1–18. [PubMed]
  • Droge W. Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:47–95. [PubMed]
  • Engle MR, Singh SP, Czernik PJ, Gaddy D, Montague DC, Ceci JD, Yang Y, Awasthi S, Awasthi YC, Zimniak P. Physiological role of mGSTA4-4, a glutathione S-transferase metabolizing 4-hydroxynonenal: generation and analysis of mGsta4 null mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;194:296–308. [PubMed]
  • Franco AA, Odom RS, Rando TA. Regulation of antioxidant enzyme gene expression in response to oxidative stress and during differentiation of mouse skeletal muscle. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27:1122–1132. [PubMed]
  • Fridovich I. The biology of oxygen radicals. Science. 1978;201:875–880. [PubMed]
  • Fuchs J, Huflejt ME, Rothfuss LM, Wilson DS, Carcamo G, Packer L. Acute effects of near ultraviolet light and visible light on the cutaneous antioxidant system. Photochem Photobiol. 1989;50:739–744. [PubMed]
  • Gonzalez-Aragon D, Ariza J, Villalba JM. Dicoumarol impairs mitochondrial electron transport and pyrimidine biosynthesis in human myeloid leukemia HL-60 cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:427–439. [PubMed]
  • Gray JP, Heck DE, Mishin V, Smith PJ, Hong J-Y, Thiruchelvam M, Cory-Slechta DA, Laskin DL, Laskin JD. Paraquat increases cyanide-insensitive respiration in murine lung epithelial cells by activating an NAD(P)H:paraquat oxidoreductase. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:7939–7949. [PubMed]
  • Hager B, Bickenbach JR, Fleckman P. Long-term culture of murine epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;112:971–976. [PubMed]
  • Hayes JD, Flanagan JU, Jowsey IR. Glutathione transferases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;45:51–88. [PubMed]
  • Hayes JD, McLellan LI. Glutathione and glutathione-dependent enzymes represent a co-ordinately regulated defense against oxidative stress. Free Radic Res. 1999b;31:273–300. [PubMed]
  • Hayes JD, Strange RC. Potential contribution of the glutathione S-transferase supergene family to resistance to oxidative stress. Free Radic Res. 1995;22:193–207. [PubMed]
  • Jakobsson P-J, Morgenstern R, Mancini J, Ford-Hutchinson A, Persson B. Common structural features of MAPEG-a widespread superfamily of membrane associated proteins with highly divergent functions in eicosanoid and glutathione metabolism. Protein Sci. 1999;8:689–692. [PubMed]
  • Jakobsson P-J, Morgenstern R, Mancini J, Ford-Hutchinson A, Persson B. Membrane-associated proteins in eicosanoid and glutathione metabolism (MAPEG) Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. 2000;161:S20–S24. [PubMed]
  • Jakobsson PJ, Mancini JA, Riendeau D, Ford-Hutchinson AW. Identification and characterization of a novel microsomal enzyme with glutathione-dependent transferase and peroxidase activities. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:22934–22939. [PubMed]
  • Jee SH, Kuo HW, Su WP, Chang CH, Sun CC, Wang JD. Photodamage and skin cancer among paraquat workers. Int J Dermatol. 1995;34:466–469. [PubMed]
  • Kelner MJ, Bagnell R. Alteration of endogenous glutathione peroxidase, manganese superoxide dismutase, and glutathione transferase activity in cells transfected with a copper-zinc superoxide dismutase expression vector. Explanation for variations in paraquat resistance. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:10872–10875. [PubMed]
  • Keyse SH, Tyrrell RM. Induction of the heme oxygenase gene in human skin fibroblasts by hydrogen peroxide and UVA (365 nm) radiation: evidence for the involvement of the hydroxyl radical. Carcinogenesis. 1990;11:787–791. [PubMed]
  • Kim-Jun H. Inhibitory effects of alpha- and beta-carotene on croton oil-induced or enzymatic lipid peroxidation and hydroperoxide production in mouse skin epidermis. Int J Biochem. 1993;25:911–915. [PubMed]
  • Kishi T, Takahashi T, Mizobuchi S, Mori K, Okamoto T. Effect of dicumarol, a Nad(P)h: quinone acceptor oxidoreductase 1 (DT-diaphorase) inhibitor on ubiquinone redox cycling in cultured rat hepatocytes. Free Radic Res. 2002;36:413–419. [PubMed]
  • Krall J, Bagley AC, Mullenbach GT, Hallewell RA, Lynch RE. Superoxide mediates the toxicity of paraquat for cultured mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:1910–1914. [PubMed]
  • Levine RL. Carbonyl modified proteins in cellular regulation, aging, and disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;32:790–796. [PubMed]
  • Liang F-Q, Alssadi R, Morehead P, Awasthi YC, Godley BF. Enhanced expression of glutathione-S-transferase A1-1 protects against oxidative stress in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:113–119. [PubMed]
  • Maines MD, Panahian N. The heme oxygenase system and cellular defense mechanisms. Do HO-1 and HO-2 have different functions? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001;502:249–272. [PubMed]
  • Michaelis L, Hill ES. The viologen indicators. J Gen Physiol. 1933;16:859–874. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mosialou E, Oiemonte F, Andersson C, Vos RM, van Bladeren PJ, Morgenstern R. Microsomal glutathione transferase: lipid-derived substrates and lipid dependence. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;320:210–216. [PubMed]
  • Nakamura Y, Murakami A, Ohto Y, Torikai K, Tanaka T, Ohigashi H. Suppression of tumor promoter-induced oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in mouse skin by a superoxide generation inhibitor 1'-acetoxychavicol acetate. Cancer Res. 1998;58:4832–4839. [PubMed]
  • O'Donnell VB, Tew DG, Jones OTG, England PJ. Studies on the inhibitory mechanisms of iodonium compounds with special reference to neutrophil NADPH oxidase. Biochem J. 1993;290:41–49. [PubMed]
  • Paller MS, Eaton JW. Hazards of antioxidant combinations containing superoxide dismutase. Free Radic Biol Med. 1995;18:883–890. [PubMed]
  • Poss KD, Tonegawa S. Reduced stress defense in heme oxygenase 1-deficient cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:10925–10930. [PubMed]
  • Rezvani HR, Mazurier F, Cario-Andre M, Pain C, Ged C, Taieb A, de Verneuil H. Protective effects of catalase overexpression on UVB-induced apoptosis in normal human keratinocytes. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:17999–18007. [PubMed]
  • Riganti C, Gazzano E, Polimeni M, Costamagna C, Bosia A, Ghigo D. Diphenyleneiodonium inhibits the cell redox metabolism and induces oxidative stress. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:47726–47731. [PubMed]
  • Ruiz-Laguna J, Abril N, Prieto-Alamo MJ, Lopez-Barea J, Puyeo C. Tissue, species, and environmental differences in absolute quantities of murine mRNAs coding for alpha, mu, omega, pi and theta glutathione S-transferases. Gene Exp. 2005;12:165–176. [PubMed]
  • Sander CS, Chang H, Salzmann S, Muller CS, Ekanayake-Mudiyanselage S, Elsner P, Thiele JJ. Photoaging is associated with protein oxidation in human skin in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118:618–625. [PubMed]
  • Sasaki H, Akamatsu H, Horio T. Effects of a single exposure to UVB radiation on the activities and protein levels of copper-zinc and manganese superoxide dismutase in cultured human keratinocytes. Photochem Photobiol. 1997;65:707–713. [PubMed]
  • Scandalios JG. Oxidative stress: molecular perception and transduction of signals triggering antioxidant defenses. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38:995–1014. [PubMed]
  • Shim JH, Cho KJ, Lee RA, Kim SH, Myung PK, Choe YK, Yoon DY. E7-expressing HaCaT keratinocyte cells are resistant to oxidative stress-induced cell death via the induction of catalase. Proteomics. 2005;5:2112–2122. [PubMed]
  • Stadtman ER. Oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins by radiolysis and metal-catalyzed reactions. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 1993;62:797. [PubMed]
  • Sweeney C, Ambrosone CB, Joseph L, Stone A, Hutchins LF, Kadlubar FF, Coles BF. Association between a glutathione S-transferase A1 promoter polymorphism and survival after breast cancer treatment. Int J Cancer. 2003;103:810–814. [PubMed]
  • Tampo Y, Tsukamoto M, Yonaha M. Superoxide production from paraquat evoked by exogenous NADPH in pulmonary endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27:588–595. [PubMed]
  • Theile JJ, Hseih SS, Briviba K, Sies H. Protein oxidation in human stratum corneum: susceptibility of keratins to oxidation in vitro and presence of a keratin oxidation gradient in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;113:335–339. [PubMed]
  • Thiele JJ, Traber MG, Tsang K, Cross CE, Packer L. In vivo exposure of ozone depletes vitamins C and E and induces lipid peroxidation in epidermal layers of murine skin. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997;23:385–391. [PubMed]
  • Thiruchelvam M, Prokopenko O, Cory-Slechta DA, Richfield EK, Buckley B, Mironitchenko O. Overexpression of superoxide dismutase or glutathione peroxidase protects against the paraquat + maneb-induced Parkinson disease phenotype. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:22530–22539. [PubMed]
  • Tomita M. Comparison of one-electron reduction activity against the bipyridylium herbicides, paraquat and diquat, in microsomal and mitochondrial fractions of liver, lung and kidney (in vitro) Biochem Pharmacol. 1991;42:303–309. [PubMed]
  • Trouba KJ, Hamadeh HK, Amin RP, Germolec DR. Oxidative stress and its role in skin disease. Antiox Redox Signal. 2002;4:665–673. [PubMed]
  • Valacchi G, Pagnin E, Corbacho AM, Olano E, Davis PA, Packer L, Cross CE. In vivo ozone exposure induces antioxidant/stress-related responses to murine lung and skin. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;36:673–681. [PubMed]
  • Van Remmen H, Qi W, Sabia M, Freeman G, Estlack L, Yang H, Mao Guo Z, Huang TT, Strong R, Lee S, Epstein CJ, Richardson A. Multiple deficiencies in antioxidant enzymes in mice result in a compound increase in sensitivity to oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;36:1625–1634. [PubMed]
  • Vetrano AM, Heck DE, Mariano TM, Mishin V, Laskin DL, Laskin JD. Characterization of the oxidase activity in mammalian catalase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:35372–35381. [PubMed]
  • Vilaplana J, Azon A, Romaguera C, Lecha M. Phototoxic contact dermatitis with toxic hepatitis due to the percutaneous absorption of paraquat. Contact Dermatitis. 1993;29:163–164. [PubMed]
  • Wang JD, Li WE, Hu FC, Hu KH. Occupational risk and the development of premalignant skin lesions among paraquat manufacturers. Br J Ind Med. 1987;44:196–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Winterbourn CC. Production of hydroxyl radicals from paraquat radicals and H2O2. FEBS Lett. 1981;128:339–342. [PubMed]
  • Yang Y, Sharma R, Zimniak P, Awasthi YC. Role of alpha class glutathione S-transferases as antioxidant enzymes in rodent tissues. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2002;182:105–115. [PubMed]
  • Yeh ST, Gue HR, Su YS, Lin HJ, Hou CC, Chen HM, Chang MC, Wang YJ. Protective effects of N-acetylcysteine treatment post acute paraquat intoxication in rats and human lung epithelial cells. Toxicology. 2006;223:181–190. [PubMed]
  • Yu BP. Cellular defenses against damage from reactive oxygen species. Physiol Rev. 1994;74:139–162. [PubMed]
  • Yuspa SH, Hennings H, Tucker RW, Jaken S, Kilkenny AE, Roop DR. Signal transduction for proliferation and differentiation in keratinocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;548:191–196. [PubMed]
  • Yuspa SH, Kilkenny AE, Steinert PM, Roopq DR. Expression of murine epidermal differentiation markers is tightly regulated by restricted extracellular calcium concentrations in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:1207–1217. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zelko IN, Mariani TJ, Folz RJ. Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;33:337–349. [PubMed]
  • Zhao H, Joseph J, Fales HM, Sokoloski EA, Levine RL, Vasquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B. Detection and characterization of the product of hydroethidine and intracellular superoxide by HPLC and limitations of fluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:5727–5732. [PubMed]