The principal finding of this study is that the two most abundant lysoPC species in plasma are capable of inhibition of plasma sPLA2 activity. We documented this inhibition
ex vivo and
in vivo with plasma samples from rats after treatment with palmitoyl or stearoyl lysoPC species. The fate of these exogenous lysoPCs after they were added to the plasma or injected into the animals is uncertain. It is likely that they ultimately reside in one or more of the functionally available pools of lysoPC, either free, micellar, bound to LDL or serum proteins such as albumin or immunoglobulin (anti-phospholipid-immune complexes). The relative abundance of these forms and of the total lysoPC concentration in plasma is expected to be highly regulated, including by the balanced activity of sPLA2s and lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferases [
45], enzymes that cleave and attach the A2 fatty acid. Despite these uncertainties as to the fate of the exogenous lysoPCs, it appears that a 10–20% increase in their total molar concentration in plasma is sufficient to inhibit sPLA2 activity
ex vivo. In addition, the fact that we used a general sPLA2 substrate further suggests these lysoPCs have the potential to inhibit several of the sPLA2 isoforms found in plasma [
46,
47].
Uncompetitive inhibitors are ideal for
in vivo applications because they are most effective during periods of elevated enzyme activity, but do not necessarily respond to normal levels of activity [
23,
48,
49]. These inhibitors bind the enzyme-substrate complex (ES), and for sPLA2 enzymes, levels of this complex are highest during periods of inflammatory stress [
23]. Since there are presumably high levels of lysoPC product at this time, all the elements required to optimize uncompetitive inhibition are well represented as the sPLA2-driven inflammatory response proceeds. This uncompetitive property of the inhibition also suggests the biomolecular configuration of the inhibitory complex, i.e., where this inhibition is likely to occur. Assuming the enzyme "scoots" along the surface of circulating phospholipid (PL) particles [
50], it is suggested that the lysoPC inhibitor attacks the substrate at points of advancing enzyme activity (Fig. ). It would be at these points that enzyme, substrate, and lysoPC inhibitor are adjacent and could form the enzyme-substrate-inhibitor (ESI) complex. The lysoPC involved in the inhibition could come from the hydrolysis of PC containing particles ("desorbed" lysoPC) [
51], free, or albumin-bound lysoPC in the circulation (see below), or from exogenous sources as in our experiments.
The pro-inflammatory effects of lysoPCs have been well documented, both as exogenous agents of toxicity and as products of sPLA2 hydrolysis. For example, the contribution of lysoPCs to atherosclerotic lesions is a prime example of ability of sPLA2 enzyme activity to direct a local injurious inflammatory response. LysoPC has been considered a principal agent of this activity [
52,
53]. In the nervous system, exogenous lysoPCs are used in demyelination studies and as a trigger for responses of the innate immune system in order to model neuroinflammatory disorders [
54]. Glutamate toxicity after cerebral ischemia is exaggerated by local infusion of lysoPC [
55], an effect attributed to the "detergent action" of the lipid [
56]. In the plasma however, where most lysoPCs are bound to albumin [
39,
43,
57], it is assumed that endogenous lysoPCs are much less toxic, perhaps because of this binding [
58]. Our data indicate that at physiological concentrations, albumin does not effect lysoPC inhibition of plasma sPLA2 activity
ex vivo or
in vivo. Considering these results and the model presented above, it is can be suggested that: 1) albumin binding does not effect the binding to PC containing particles and subsequently the ability of the lysoPC to inhibit enzyme activity, or that 2), in some situations the affinity of the lysoPC for these particles is stronger than it is for albumin. The latter condition has been suggested to occur for oxidized low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) particles both normally and during certain pathologies [
57,
59]. One interesting possibility is that the affinity of the PC-containing particles for lysoPCs is regulated by sPLA2 activity; for example, as activity is increased, the concentration of desorbed lysoPCs also increases, making the particles more receptive to incorporating the lysoPC product, which in turn limits enzymatic activity. The present results suggest that exogenous lysoPCs also increase this affinity, thereby accomplishing sPLA2 inhibition and cytoprotection. In this circumstance however, the potential toxicity of excess lysoPCs cannot be ignored, so there is likely an upper limit of lysoPC dosages that will accomplish the inhibition without cytotoxicity. Dose limitations of synthetic lysoPCs have been demonstrated for treatment of rodent endotoxaemia [
17]. Along these same lines, the bactericidal properties of sPLA2s suggest a similar constraint exists regarding the extent of enzyme inhibition tolerated in models of fulminate bacterial infections [
60].
The present results may complement recent studies that explore other mechanisms for the anti-inflammatory activities of lysoPCs. For example, the experiments of Chen, et al [
20] showed the specific influence of LysoPC 18:0 on pro-inflammatory HMGB1 release from monocytes and macrophages. Although this effect appears partially mediated by the G2A receptor, we suggest that the well-known relationship between sPLA2 activity and macrophage activity is also relevant, especially because of the late stage at which the lysoPC was administered [
2,
45,
61,
62]. It is expected that during this late period, the cascading inflammatory response would make conditions ideal for uncompetitive product inhibition of sPLA2 and resulting attenuation of monocyte/macrophage functions. Likewise, there is substantial cross talk between sPLA2 enzymes and the activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines that have been implicated in sepsis models [
17]. The suggestion that lysoPC 18:0 also enhances microbial elimination during sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture [
18] might reflect direct effects of the lysoPCs on bacterial sPLA2 enzymes, since bacterial sPLA2s with remarkable similarities to the mammalian enzymes have now been characterized [
63]. Finally, the diminished LysoPC/PC (product/substrate) ratio found in sepsis patients that are more likely to recover [
16] is entirely consistent with inhibition of sPLA2 activity described here. The inhibition might slow the inflammatory cascade and increase the probability of recovery.