Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procascamcLink to Publisher's site
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995 : 416–420.
PMCID: PMC2579126

Categorization of free-text problem lists: an effective method of capturing clinical data.


Problem lists assist in organizing patient information in computer based medical records. However, in order to use problem lists for billing, research, decision support and standardization, a categorization of the problems entered is required. We describe the problem list component of our computerized patient record, the On-line Medical Record (OMR), which combines a free-text entry mechanism with a categorization scheme, using a dictionary containing 846 terms. All 118,040 problems entered during the system's six years of use have been analyzed, 477 clinicians have entered a mean +/- S.D. of 238 +/- 604 problems into 22,311 patient records. The average number of problems in each patient's file was 5.1 +/- 3.9. Comments were typed for 80,281 (68%) of the problems, ranging in length from 1 to 2456 characters, with a mean length of 98 +/- 110 characters. Half the problems were entered on the day of the encounter with the patient. Overall, 66% of all problems were categorized in relation to terms from the problem dictionary. Lexical analysis of all problem names showed that 80% could be mapped to Meta 1.4, Snomed 3.0 or a pre-release version of Read 3.0. We conclude that a problem list entry scheme combining free-text entry and optional categorization using a dictionary can result in a high proportion of problems being categorized as desired. Improvement of the system by elimination of unused dictionary terms and addition of 1000 terms identified by the lexical analysis is likely to result in even higher categorization rates.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (887K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Campbell JR, Payne TH. A comparison of four schemes for codification of problem lists. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:201–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Campbell JR, Kallenberg GA, Sherrick RC. The clinical utility of META: an analysis for hypertension. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:397–401. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Friedman C. The UMLS coverage of clinical radiology. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:309–313. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Scherpbier HJ, Abrams RS, Roth DH, Hail JJ. A simple approach to physician entry of patient problem list. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:206–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wilton R. Non-categorical problem lists in a primary-care information system. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:823–827. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bleich HL, Beckley RF, Horowitz GL, Jackson JD, Moody ES, Franklin C, Goodman SR, McKay MW, Pope RA, Walden T, et al. Clinical computing in a teaching hospital. N Engl J Med. 1985 Mar 21;312(12):756–764. [PubMed]
  • McCray AT, Srinivasan S, Browne AC. Lexical methods for managing variation in biomedical terminologies. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:235–239. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association