|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Pax6 regulates eye development in many animals. In addition, Pax6 activates atonal transcription factors in both invertebrate and vertebrate eyes. Here we investigate the roles of Pax6 and atonal during embryonic development of Limulus polyphemus rudimentary lateral, medial and ventral eyes, and the initiation of lateral ommatidial eye and medial ocelli formation. Limulus eye development is of particular interest because these animals hold a unique position in arthropod phylogeny and possess multiple eye types. Furthermore, the molecular underpinnings of eye development have yet to be investigated in chelicerates. We characterized a Limulus Pax6 gene, with multiple splice products and predicted protein isoforms, and one atonal homologue. Unexpectedly, neither gene is expressed in the developing eye types examined, although both genes are present in the lateral sense organ, a structure of unknown function.
Eye morphology, tissue and cell type composition, and mechanisms of photoreception and phototransduction are features that define the diversity of eye types found in different organisms. Eye development also provides valuable data for phylogenetic analyses, particularly those concerning bilaterian relationships (reviewed in Arendt and Wittbrodt, 2001; Arendt, 2003). In recent years, evolutionary comparisons of developmental gene hierarchies have contributed to theories of eye evolution, to the extent that several long-standing views were revised (Halder et al., 1995b; Gehring, 1996; Callaerts et al., 1997; Pichaud et al., 2001). One transcription factor with a highly conserved and essential role in eye development is Pax6. Mutational analyses have demonstrated that Pax6 is critical for initial eye specification and differentiation (Hill et al., 1991; Ton, 1991; Glaser et al., 1992; Quiring et al., 1994). Conversely, misexpression of Pax6 revealed its sufficiency, since it respecifies ectodermal tissues into partial or complete ectopic eyes (Halder et al., 1995a; Tomarev et al., 1997; Chow et al., 1999). However, Pax6 is not universally expressed during metazoan visual system development. For example, particular jellyfish, polychaete worm, myriapod and amphioxus eyes or visual organs lack Pax6 expression (Glardon et al., 1998; Arendt et al., 2002; Piatigorsky and Kozmik, 2004; Prpic, 2005). Instead, the expression of Pax-B and So within embryonic jellyfish or adult Platyneris eyes respectively, point to alternative mechanisms of eye development in some species (Arendt et al., 2002; Piatigorsky and Kozmik, 2004).
Nonetheless, multiple features of the Pax6 gene are well conserved among bilaterians. First, the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein retains high identity, particularly within the paired- and homeodomains that bind DNA (reviewed in Callaerts et al., 1997). Moreover, the exon/intron structure of numerous Pax6 genes are strongly conserved, as are distinct cis-regulatory elements and trans-acting factors that bind them (Callaerts et al., 1997; Kammandel et al., 1999; Xu et al., 1999). Some invertebrate species have duplicate Pax6 genes (Czerny and Busslinger, 1995; Jun et al., 1998; Czerny et al., 1999; Prpic, 2005), whereas most chordates have a single Pax6 gene (reviewed in Callaerts et al., 1997; van Heyningen and Williamson, 2002). Instead of gene duplication and functional divergence, vertebrate Pax6 functions are divided among distinct splice products and/or protein isoforms (Carriere et al., 1993; Epstein et al., 1994; Glardon et al., 1998; Mishra et al., 2002; Lakowski et al., 2007).
Concomitant with Pax6 gene conservation is its maintained regulation of orthologous downstream genes (reviewed in Wawersik and Maas, 2000; Hanson, 2001; Friedrich, 2006). For instance, eya-Eya, so-Six and atonal-Ath5 gene families all act immediately downstream of Pax6 in both fruit fly and mouse eye development. These downstream genes also perform conserved roles in specific aspects of eye development. For example, the atonal-Ath5 family encodes basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) factors that specify the first retinal neuron class during fruit fly, zebrafish, chick, frog and mouse eye development (reviewed in Vetter and Brown, 2001; Mu and Klein, 2004).
The visual system of the chelicerate Limulus polyphemus (Lp) has been studied for decades, especially with respect to its circadian biology, neuroanatomy and physiology (H.K. Hartline, 1956; Barlow, 1969; Snodderly and Barlow, 1970; French, 1980; Sekiguchi et al., 1982; Barlow et al., 2001). More recently, molecular approaches have been applied to studies of Limulus eye development (Harzsch et al., 2006). During embryogenesis three types of rudimentary eyes (lateral, median and ventral) develop and innervate the brain (see Figure 1 of Harzsch et al., 2006 for detailed diagrams). All are closely associated with pigmented cells termed guanophores, and these eyes seem to provide phototic input during embryonic and early larval life (French, 1980; Harzsch et al., 2006). Subsequently, the lateral compound eye and median ocellar eyes develop during larval stages and provide major visual inputs in adult animals. The lateral compound eyes, median ocelli, lateral and ventral rudimentary eyes express visible light opsins (Smith et al., 1993; Battelle et al., 2001; Dalal et al., 2003), and median ocelli also display UV-sensitivity (Nolte and Brown, 1969). The opsins in the median rudimentary eyes are not yet known. Two Limulus opsin genes encoding visible light proteins have been characterized (reviewed in Batelle, 2006), and the photoreceptor cells within the various eyes classified as rhabdomeric (Arendt and Wittbrodt, 2001). In an evolutionary context, Limulus is interesting because it has both multiple eyes and eye types, which raises the possibility for heterogeneity in the development of different eyes and types of visual organs. In addition, regulatory genes involved in eye development have been described for all major arthropod lineages, except chelicerates.
Here we report isolation and embryonic expression of Lp Pax6 and atonal genes. Paradoxically, we found that neither gene is expressed during eye development in the Limulus embryo or young larvae. Instead, we found Pax6 expression in the developing brain, ventral nerve cord, and lateral sense organ. In addition a Lp atonal family member was identified, but is only expressed in the developing lateral sense organ, a sensory structure whose function remains unresolved. These findings suggest that particular aspects of Limulus embryogenesis are divergent from other arthropods.
A Limulus polyphemus (Lp) Pax6 800 bp fragment, encoding partial paired- and homeodomains, was isolated by low-stringency RT-PCR using the strategy, nested primers and PCR conditions previously described by Arendt et al. (2002). Multiple subclones of this fragment had identical nucleotide sequences. 5′ and 3′ RACE were then performed on mixed stage embryo cDNA. We isolated distinct 5′ RACE products (Figures 1 and and2),2), but only one 3′ RACE product of 1.2 Kb in length. DNA sequence analysis indicated that this product contains a partial Pax6 paired domain, homeodomain, stop codon and 3′ UTR (Figures 1A, ,2A).2A). Twelve different 5′ RACE subclones were DNA sequenced, their nucleotide sequences compared and then divided into five classes (Figure 1A). Four of five classes differ only in their 5′ UTR, with all subclones converging at the same predicted splice acceptor site, 91 nucleotides upstream of the ATG start codon (asterisk in top four diagrams of Figure 1A). The 5′ RACE products of these four classes have identical nucleotide sequences, from the putative splice site to their 3′ end within the coding region (Figure 1A). The fifth 5′ RACE product has a shorter 5′ UTR, predicted alternative ATG start codon and four unique amino acids, which are in frame with the paired domain (boldfaced amino acids in Clone 11, Figure 2A). This RACE product is predicted to use a separate downstream splice acceptor site (asterisk in Clone 11 in Figure 1A). This 5′ RACE product has identical nucleotide sequence to that of the other four classes, from the first codon of the paired domain to its 3′ end.
To characterize the 5′ end of Lp Pax6 further, we sequentially probed a genomic Southern blot at high stringency, with three cDNA probes (Figures 1A–B). When the hybridization patterns of Probes 1 and 2 were compared, a subset of bands are shared between these probes (white asterisks), while some bands were hybridized strictly by Probe 2 (yellow asterisks or a white arrow). To understand whether Probe 2-specific bands represent restriction fragments containing 3′ nucleotides beyond the end of probe 1, we next determined the genomic Southern blot pattern of probe 3 (Figure 1A probe diagram). Comparison of Probe 2 and 3 hybridization patterns (Figure B) indicates that all bands, except one (white arrow in middle blot), contain Lp Pax6 3′-specific sequences. Bands denoted with orange asterisks are common to all three probes. To explore the possibility that the Lp genome contains more than one Pax6 gene, we probed a genomic Southern blot with Probe 2 at low stringency, and observed the identical hybridization pattern found at high stringency in Figure 1B (data not shown). We conclude that Lp embryos possess at least one Pax6 gene, with multiple 5′ splice products, which are predicted to produce two distinct protein isoforms (Figures 1A, ,2A2A).
Overall Lp Pax6 shares significant amino acid identity in the paired domain with all Pax6 proteins aligned (Figure 2B). The Lp Pax6 paired domain has highest amino acid identity (92%) with Drosophila toy, and lowest (78%) with the flatworm Dugesia (Figure 2B). Both parsimony and Bayesian analyses provide strong support that among the Pax6 paired domains analyzed, Lp Pax6 is closely related to Drosophila toy. Moreover, within the paired domains of toy and ey, there is a critical difference of one amino acid, which has been previously demonstrated as critical for DNA binding affinity (Czerny et al., 1999). In both Lp Pax6 and Drosophila toy this residue is an asparagine, which is typical of most non-arthropod Pax6 genes. However, Drosophila ey and amphioxus Pax6 encode a glycine at this position. This further suggests that Lp Pax6 is more closely related to toy than it is to ey. The paired domains of these two genes may also be closely related to Pax6.2 of the myriapod Glomeris. However, this interpretation is tentative since the complete amino acid sequences of the Glomeris Pax6 paired domains may demonstrate that Pax6.2 is not closely related to Lp Pax6 and toy (Figure 3).
Although our data imply a monophyly of Pax6-eye genes among ecdyzosoans, the relationship of Drosophila paired, to that of Ciona Pax6 and all Pax6 sequences analyzed, is puzzling (Figure 3). The positions of Drosophila paired and ey are not well supported by our analyses, since the bootstrap values were low. Because bootstrap values >70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities >0.95 are needed to show strong support in phylogenetic analyses (Hillis and Bull, 1993; Wilcox et al., 2002), an expansion of the Pax6 paired domain dataset and its outgroups might resolve these discrepancies. Interestingly, there is strong support from both phylogenetic analyses for the close relationship among hemichordate and mollusk Pax6-eye paired domains (Figure 3).
To isolate Lp Atonal bHLH homologues, degenerate bHLH domain primers and standard PCR conditions were used with Lp genomic DNA (Brown et al., 1998), since atonal gene orthologues contain no introns. Ten subclones containing the predicted 135 bp product were DNA sequenced and the nucleotide sequences compared. We found three highly related, but distinct, bHLH domains encoded (Figure 4A). The nested RT-PCR strategy of Arendt et al. (2002) was tried several times on mixed embryo cDNA, but no PCR products recovered contained bHLH domains. To obtain additional Lp atonal coding sequences, gene specific primers were designed from the bHLH domain isolated in 6 of 10 subclones (Figure 4A) and 5′ and 3′ RACE performed with mixed stage embryo cDNA. For 3′ RACE one 450 bp product was obtained that is predicted to encode the 3′ end of a bHLH domain, plus two additional amino acids (Figure 4B), immediately followed by a stop codon and 3′ UTR. We were unable to isolate any 5′ RACE products, despite repeated attempts with several different gene-specific primers and a variety of PCR conditions. The partial coding region obtained is highly similar to Drosophila Atonal (69%) Cato (71%) and Amos (73%), but shares the highest amino acid identity with Anopheles Atonal (81%)(Figure 4C). Interestingly, this Lp Atonal partial cDNA encodes a polypeptide with higher amino acid identity to mouse Math1 (78%) than to Math5 (71%). This implies that Limulus atonal is more related to Math1.
Both parsimony and Bayesian analyses provide strong support that among bHLH domains, Lp atonal is most closely related to atonal, Ath1, and Ath5 (Figure 5). While there is strong support for the monophyly of Ath1 genes, there is only very weak support for the inclusion of Lp atonal in a lineage comprising both fruit fly atonal and vertebrate Ath5 genes. Interestingly, there is strong support for a lineage each of atonal, Ath1, and Ath5 (the latter is found only in deuterostomes), as well as a lineage for arthropod amos and atonal, excluding the Limulus gene described here. Lp Atonal does not share any of the autapomorphic amino acids found in the loop region of Drosopila Cato, which suggests that these proteins are not closely related. Likewise, the first amino acid in Lp Atonal Helix1 is a histidine, whereas in Drosophila Cato and the arthropod Amos-Atonal lineage this residue is an asparagine (although in Drosophila Atonal it is a glutamine). Therefore, the phylogenetic affinities of this Lp Atonal bHLH domain remain obscure.
By RT-PCR, both Lp Pax6 and atonal mRNAs are expressed during early (st 0–12) mid (st 13–17) and late (st 18–20) horseshoe crab embryogenesis (Figure 6A). To determine the tissue localization of these transcripts, we also performed whole mount in situ hybridization. Unfortunately, we were unable to analyze embryos younger than st 13 due to their fragility during riboprobe hybridization at stringent temperatures. Beginning around stages 16/17, we observed Lp-Pax6 mRNA expression in the forming brain (white arrows in Figure 6B,D,F,H), ventral nerve cord (black arrows in Figure 6B,D,F,H) and lateral sense organs (Figure 7K,L)(n=25 experiments). All three expression domains were absent in age matched sense controls (Figure 6C,E,G,I and data not shown). Among the different Pax6 expression domains, the lateral sense organ exhibited the most robust expression (Figure 7K). However, the alkaline phosphatase color reaction product that appeared in evaginating appendages from stage 14 to trilobite larvae was not real Pax6 mRNA expression, since sense control embryos had the same staining (asterisks in Figure 6B-I). We also analyzed Lp atonal expression in parallel to that of Pax6. By contrast, atonal is only expressed in the forming lateral sense organ, from st 17/18 to hatching trilobite larvae (Figures 7I,J and data not shown; n ≥ 25 experiments). For both Lp Pax6 and atonal, no expression was found in any of the diverse eyes developing from stage 13 to trilobite larvae hatching (Figures 6, ,77 and data not shown).
Lp MyoIII protein expression has been described for the embryonic lateral, median and ventral rudimentary photoreceptors, and larval and adult compound lateral eye ommatidial and medial ocellar photoreceptors (Battelle et al., 2001; Harzsch et al., 2006). The Lp MyoIII gene encodes a photoreceptor cell-specific, unconventional myosin that is under circadian regulation (Battelle et al., 1998). To establish conditions for Limulus whole mount in situ hybridization and to follow embryonic and larval eye development, we compared MyoIII mRNA and protein expression from st 13 through newly hatched larval development (Figures 7A–H). At st 18, MyoIII mRNA expression first appears in rudimentary lateral and median photoreceptor cells (Figures 7A–B), but no expression was observed in the lateral sense organ. However, the anti-MyoIII antibody weakly labels the rudimentary lateral and median eyes, as well as the lateral sense organ beginning at st 18 (Figure 7D and Harzsch et al., 2006). Because the MyoIII antisera, but not our MyoIII riboprobe, labeled the lateral sense organ it suggests that another MyoIII-like protein is present in this sensory structure.
At st 20–1, MyoIII mRNA is expressed within the first lateral eye ommatidial cells, situated in the center of a crescent of rudimentary photoreceptors (C′ and C″ high magnifications of the lateral eyes in C). MyoIII is also maintained in the rudimentary median eye at this older age (Figure 7C). During st 20 a small number of ventral photoreceptor cells express MyoIII mRNA (Figure 7F) and protein (Figure 7G). MyoIII protein is localized similarly to visual arrestin (VAR, a photoreceptor-specific protein) in the rudimentary ventral eyes, lateral and median optic nerves (Figures 7G–H). In animals st 18 and older, Lp atonal and Pax6 mRNA expression was observed in the lateral sense organ that lies ventral to the lateral rudimentary eye (black arrows in Figures 7I–L). These two sense organs are readily distinguished by their dorsal-ventral positions and distinct morphologies (compare insets in Figures 7A and 7I). Because we found no evidence of Lp Pax6 or atonal expression analogous to that of MyoIII, we conclude that neither gene is expressed during the formation of the three different rudimentary eyes or early lateral compound eye and median ocellar development.
Limulus polyphemus (Lp) embryology has been studied since the late 1800s. Much more recently, investigations of chelicerate embryonic body patterning and neural development were reported by multiple groups (Telford and Thomas, 1998; Abzhanov et al., 1999; Stollewerk et al., 2001; Dearden et al., 2002; Mittmann, 2002; Dearden et al., 2003; Mittmann and Scholtz, 2003; Maxmen et al., 2005; Pioro and Stollewerk, 2006). However, only a handful of developmentally expressed Limulus genes have been characterized (Cartwright et al., 1993; Cook et al., 2001; Mittmann and Scholtz, 2001; Davis et al., 2005). Likewise, the Lp visual system has been investigated for decades (reviewed in Barlow, 2003; Batelle, 2006) but, the molecular mechanisms of eye development in Limulus and other chelicerates, is still unknown. The goal of this study was to link Lp Pax6 and atonal genes to the formation of one or more types of Limulus eyes. Much to our surprise, we found neither gene is expressed during the formation of different eyes. Instead, we observed Lp Pax6 expression in the brain and ventral nerve cord and the expression of both genes in the lateral sense organ.
There are multiple explanations for these findings that are not mutually exclusive. First, since these transcription factors are expressed at younger ages than our in situ experiments could assay, it is plausible they act in the eye primoridia(s) prior to stage 13. Second, there are other instances of bilaterian eyes that do not express Pax6, and this may also be the case for Limulus. For example, Platynereis larval eyes express Pax6, but their adult eyes form via a Pax6-independent mechanism that involves So/Six gene expression (Arendt et al., 2002). The myriapod Glomeris has two Pax6 genes, yet neither is associated with eye formation, and amphioxus Pax6 is present in its multiple eye types, but not the Organ of Hesse that contains photoreceptors (Glardon et al., 1998; Prpic, 2005). Analogously, deuterostome eye specification requires the Rx gene that acts upstream of Pax6 (Furukawa et al., 1997; Mathers et al., 1997; D’Aniello et al., 2006). Finally, multiple Pax6 and/or atonal genes may exist now or during the evolutionary history of Limulus, meaning a Pax6 or atonal paralogue may regulate eye development. Indeed, our isolation of three different atonal-class bHLH domains, suggests there are multiple Lp atonal-like genes. The Lp atonal described here is only expressed in the lateral sense organ, a structure of unknown function. The high amino acid identity among Lp Atonal, Drosophila Amos and Mus Math1 proteins, whose functions in auditory or olfactory development are known (Bermingham et al., 1999; zur Lage et al., 2003), may indicate that the lateral sense organ is involved in auditory or olfactory sensation.
Horseshoe crabs are often considered “living fossils” as they obtained their present morphological form at least by the mid Mesozoic (ca. 160 million years ago, Fisher, 1984), but possibly as early as the late Ordovican (ca. 445 million years ago, Rudkin et al., 2008). However, the last common ancestor of living taxa was more recent, probably within the last 80 million years (Avise et al., 1994). Here we describe several distinct features of the Limulus Pax6 gene, as compared to those of other arthropods. Along with the absence of Pax6 mRNA expression in multiple developing eye types, another unanticipated characteristic of Lp Pax6 is its predicted multiple splice products that would give rise to distinct isoforms. Intriguingly, distinct splice products and protein isoforms are features of vertebrate Pax6 genes. Together our findings suggest that Limulus embryos employ divergent gene networks in their developing visual systems and appendages. In the future it will be exciting to understand whether these are also characteristics of other chelicerate species. While morphological stasis may characterize horseshoe crab evolution, further research on their embryology may provide important insight into the evolution of novel gene networks.
The collection protocols of Harzsch et al. (2006) were followed, except that water was changed every other day with artificial seawater plus 100U/ml of penicillin (Sigma) and 100 μg/ml of streptomyocin (Sigma), to prevent microorganism growth that reduced viability. Published embryo staging criteria were used (Sekiguchi et al., 1982; Harzsch et al., 2006). Stage 13–17 embryos were dechorionated in 50% bleach for 5 minutes, rinsed three times in dH20 and fixed for one hour, rocking in a 50:50 mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS and heptane. The aqueous phase was replaced with methanol and embryos vigorously shaken in heptane-methanol for 30 seconds to rupture outer membranes. Both heptane and methanol were replaced with three changes of fresh methanol and embryos stored in methanol at −20°C. Older embryos and trilobite larvae were hand dissected from outer membranes and processed as younger embryos minus dechorionation.
A previously published PCR strategy (Arendt et al., 2002) was used to amplify Pax6 conserved domains from mixed stage Limulus (Lp) cDNA. The remainder of the Pax6 coding region was isolated via 5′ and 3′ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends). Lp atonal bHLH domains were PCR amplified from genomic DNA, with degenerate primers (Brown et al., 1998) and 40 cycles of 95°C × 30 sec, 60°C × 60 sec, 68°C × 2 min. Three highly related bHLH domains were found. Primers for RACE cloning were designed from the most frequently isolated bHLH domain. 5′ and 3′ RACE for Lp Pax6 and Lp atonal used the SMART RACE cloning kit and protocol (BD/Invitrogen) and mixed embryo cDNA templates. Pax6: 5′RACE 5′-TAGAGCAACTGGCGATGATGTCGGAGG-3′; 3′RACE 5′-CAGGAGTGTCCTTCCGTATTTGCCTGG-3′; atonal: 3′RACE 5′-CCGTGAACGAAGCCGAAGCACAGTC-3′ gene-specific primers were used. Multiple products from each RACE experiment were DNA sequenced and analyzed with MacVector (v9.0) and AssemblyLIGN (v1.1, Accelrys) computer programs. GenBank accession number for Lp-atonal is EU673469. The GenBank accession numbers for Lp-Pax6 are: EU673470 Pax6 mRNA predicted to encode the predominant isoform; EU673471 Pax6 mRNA predicted to encode alternate isoform; EU673472 Pax6 5′ RACE clone 2–6,12; Pax6 EU673473 5′ RACE clone 7; EU673474 Pax6 5′ RACE clone 1,8,9; EU673475 Pax6 5′ RACE clone 10; and EU673476 Pax6 5′RACE clone 11.
Lp genomic DNA was isolated from six juvenile crabs. Nylon blots (Pall Corp.) containing 5 μg of digested, transferred and immobilized genomic DNA were prehybridized in 50% formamide, 6X SSC, 5X Denhardts, 0.5% SDS, 100μg/ml herring sperm DNA (Sigma) at 42°C, and then hybridized at either 37°C or 42°C (Glaser et al., 1992). 1–2 × 107 CPM of each gel purified and 32P-labeled cDNA probe was added to 10 ml of hybridization buffer (40% formamide, 4X SSC, 0.8X Denhardt’s, 10% dextran sulphate (American Bioanalytical), 7mM Tris (pH7.4), 100 μg/ml herring sperm DNA). Blots were washed at high (3 times in 2XSSC/0.2%SDS at 55°C, twice in 0.2XSSC/0.2%SDS at 65°C) or low (2 times in 2XSSC/0.2%SDS at 50°C, twice in the same buffer at 55°C) stringency and exposed to x-ray film.
A heuristic search using maximum parsimony in PAUP (v 4.0b10, Altivec) and a Bayesian analysis using MrBayes (v 3.0b4) were performed for both a matrix of Pax6 and related paired domains and a matrix of atonal and related bHLH domains. Amino acid sequences were downloaded from GenBank in FASTA format and aligned using CLUSTALX. For paired domain analyses, the dataset was defined as 139 amino acids comprising the paired domain and homeodomain in Pax6, Drosophila eyeless (ey) and twin of eyeless (toy), with human and rat Pax4 included as outgroups. For atonal bHLH analyses, the dataset was limited to 70 amino acids that comprise the bHLH domain in atonal homologues and six achaete-scute homologues included as an outgroup. In the Bayesian analyses, the prior probability model for the amino acid rate matrix was set to mixed, allowing the analysis to sample a range of different models for molecular evolution. Bayesian analyses were conducted for one million generations, with trees sampled every 100 generations; stationarity was obtained after approximately 10,000 generations, thus the first 100 trees were discarded as burnin.
Total RNA was isolated from > 100 embryos stage 0–12, and at least 50 embryos for the older age groups, These RNAs were pretreated with DNase prior to reverse transcription into cDNA. PCR parameters were 40 cycles of 95°C × 30 sec, 60°C × 60 sec, 68°C × 2 min with primers PAX6FOR 5′-TAGCACCACCTAACGGACGACTTC-3′, PAX6REV 5′-CACCTGGAGAAATGACACCTGC-3′; or ATOFOR 5′-CGTGAACGAAGCCGAATGCACAGTCT-3′, ATOREV 5′-TGTAAATGAGGCTTTCCCACATGTATT-3′.
Lp Pax6 and atonal antisense and sense cRNA digoxygenin-labeled riboprobes contained coding plus 3′UTR nucleotide sequences. A MyoIII antisense riboprobe was synthesized from a full-length cDNA clone (Accession Number AF062069). Several modifications were made to a whole mount in situ protocol (Hargrave and Koopman, 2000). After rehydration into PBS/0.1% Triton X-100, (PBTX) embryos ≥ stage 18 were incubated overnight at room temperature in a 1:50 dilution of 5Units/ul chitinase (Sigma) in DEPC-dH20, to remove a nearly invisible chitin cuticle. Then embryos were washed in PBTX and proteinase K digested. After refixation, but prior to prehybridization, embryos and larvae were heated to 75°C for 30 minutes to quench endogenous alkaline phosphatase. Nonspecific background was lowered by preincubating a 1:500 dilution of sheep anti-digoxygenin antibody (Roche) in 50mM Tris (pH7.5), 150mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 10% Sheep serum (Sigma), 2% BSA, 0.2% sodium azide (Sigma) plus 1mg of horseshoe crab protein powder, via rocking at 4°C for ≥4 hours. Powder was removed by brief centrifugation, and the antibody used at 1:2000. Crab powder was made by cold acetone extraction of homogenized juvenile Lp soft body parts. Anti MyoIII (1:1000) or Anti-Arrestin (VAR, 1:50) antibody labeling of Lp embryos used published protocols (Davis et al., 2001; Harzsch et al., 2006) and HRP color development.
NIH R01 EY13612 to NLB; NSF grant 0094428 to BAB
The authors thank Nipam Patel for Limulus embryo fixation, antibody and in situ staining protocols, Todd Oakley for sharing unpublished data, Tom Glaser for advice on genomic Southern blots and valuable discussion, Jon Currie for technical support and Brian Gebelein and Teresa Orenic for critical comments.