HDAC6 performs pivotal functions in modulating the dynamic of the cytoskeleton network (
Gao et al. 2007,
Tran et al. 2007,
Zhang et al. 2007) and controlling various cell responses to stress (
Kawaguchi et al. 2003,
Boyault et al. 2007b,
Kwon et al. 2007). Recent studies show that HDAC6 also plays critical roles in neurodegenerative diseases, especially polyglutamine diseases, by participating in aggresome formation and coordinating the ubiquitin proteasome system and autophagic degradation (
Iwata et al. 2005,
Olzmann et al. 2007,
Pandey et al. 2007). However, the connection at the molecular level between HDAC6 and key proteins involved in neurodegeneration has not been examined. In this report, we identified tau as a novel interacting partner of HDAC6 and provided evidence linking HDAC6 with tau phosphorylation and accumulation.
Previous studies have shown α-tubulin, cortactin, Hsp90, dynein, p97/VCP and Ras-GTPase-activating protein SH3 domain-binding protein 1 (G3BP) as binding partners of HDAC6 (
Hubbert et al. 2002,
Zhang et al. 2007,
Kovacs et al. 2005,
Kawaguchi et al. 2003,
Seigneurin-Berny et al. 2001,
Kwon et al. 2007). Here we show tau is also a bona fide interacting protein of HDAC6 as they associate
in vitro, in cell culture models as well as in human brain tissue (). The interaction is mediated by the Ser/Glu tetradecapeptide domain SE14 on HDAC6 and the microtubule binding domain on tau whereas the C-terminus of tau appears to inhibit HDAC6-tau interaction (). One possible explanation for this inhibition is that removal of the N-terminus of tau allows tighter binding of the C-terminus to the microtubule binding domain (
Jeganathan et al. 2006), which could potentially disallow interaction with other proteins. This is supported by the data showing that the construct missing the C-terminus still binds to HDAC6. Further, given that the C-terminus of tau has also been shown to inhibit tau assembly and polymerization (
Abraha et al. 2000), it would be interesting to determine whether HDAC6 can hinder the assembly of tau filaments by competing for the C-terminal truncated tau (e.g., caspase-cleaved tau) (
Gamblin et al. 2003). Tau co-immunoprecipitated efficiently with the catalytically inactive HDAC6 mutant and inactivation of HDAC6 by either tubacin or TSA did not disrupt HDAC6-tau interaction (). Therefore, their interaction is not dependent on the deacetylase activity of HDAC6. This is similar to the HDAC6-G3BP interaction (
Kwon et al. 2007) but different than the HDAC6-PP1 interaction that requires active HDAC6 (
Brush et al. 2004). These findings further support the hypothesis that by forming different protein complexes, HDAC6 functions as far more than just as a deacetylase.
Although we have clearly demonstrated that there is an interaction between HDAC6 and tau, the physiological relevance of this interaction requires further clarification. Nonetheless, our studies indicate that HDAC6 plays a role in modulating tau phosphorylation, albeit indirectly. This is supported by the finding that inhibition of HDAC6 activity by tubacin, as well as shRNA-mediated knockdown, attenuated tau phosphorylation (). Although the underlying molecular basis is still unknown, there are three possible mechanisms to explain this observation. (i) Inactivation or knockdown of HDAC6 dissociates HDAC6-protein phosphatase complexes so that more phosphatases are available for tau dephosphorylation. A similar mechanism was suggested previously for Akt dephosphorylation induced by disrupted HDAC6-PP1 association (
Chen et al. 2005,
Brush et al. 2004). (ii) Hyperacetylation of α-tubulin in these cells might alter the dynamic of microtubules and thus indirectly modulate the activities and recruitment of relevant tau kinases and phosphatases. (iii) Increased acetylation of unknown substrates and association-dissociation of other HDAC6-protein complexes induced by HDAC6 inactivation might also be involved in regulating tau phosphorylation.
Interestingly, the dephosphorylation of tau occurred at T231 but not S396/404 or S262 (). It is noteworthy that in a mouse model of AD, treatment with nicotinamide, an inhibitor of Sir2, a class III HDAC member, also caused tau dephosphorylation at T231, which was partially responsible for cognitive improvements following the treatment (
Green et al. 2007). T231 is an important site that has been implicated in the development of tau pathology. For instance, T231 is hyperphosphorylated in paired helical filament in AD brain but not in normal brain (
Goedert et al. 1994). Phosphorylation at T231 plays a critical role in regulating the ability of tau to bind and stabilize microtubules (
Cho & Johnson 2004) and might also promote tau hyperphosphorylation at other sites (
Lin et al. 2007). The underlying mechanism of the site-specific dephosphorylation is not clear. Using site-specific pseudophosphorylated tau constructs (
Ding et al. 2006) in co-immunoprecipitation assays, we did not observe differential interaction between HDAC6 and the different pseudophosphorylated tau proteins (data not shown). Further studies on the relationship of HDAC6, acetylated tubulin and tau kinases and phosphatases are needed to provide mechanistic insight into the regulation of tau phosphorylation by HDAC6.
In addition to hyperphosphorylation, tau becomes abnormally accumulated in dystrophic neurites around senile plaques and in NFTs in the AD brain. Existence of chaperones, ubiquitin ligase, and proteasome components in tau pathology clearly indicates that various cellular machineries might be actively utilized to cope with abnormal tau accumulation (
Dou et al. 2003,
Petrucelli et al. 2004,
Fergusson et al. 1996). Our study suggests that HDAC6 might play a role as well in this process. In a cell culture model, proteasome inhibition potentiated HDAC6-tau interaction () and induced accumulation and co-localization of HDAC6 and tau in a perinuclear aggresome-like compartment (). Taking this data together with the demonstrated role of HDAC6 in facilitating aggresome formation from other aggregation-prone proteins (
Kawaguchi et al. 2003,
Olzmann et al. 2007,
Kwon et al. 2007), we speculate that HDAC6 might sequester abnormally accumulated tau in a certain compartment as a neuronal response to specific pathological stressors. It is also interesting to note that HDAC6 appears to be required for the autophagy-mediated clearance of mutant huntingtin aggregates in a cell model (
Iwata et al. 2005).
We also observed up-regulation of HDAC6 in AD brain that correlates with tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation (). However, the cause and functional consequence of this up-regulation are not known. The cellular concentration of HDAC6 and p97/VCP, an AAA-ATPase chaperone, is thought to determine the fate of polyubiquitylated proteins and an excess of HDAC6 would favor the accumulation of ubiquitylated protein aggregates and inclusion body formation (
Boyault et al. 2006,
Boyault et al. 2007a). Considering the proteasome impairment in AD brain (
Lam et al. 2000,
Keck et al. 2003) and the link between HDAC6 and autophagy (
Iwata et al. 2005,
Pandey et al. 2007), it can be hypothesized that HDAC6 up-regulation might on one hand, facilitate sequestration of ubiquitylated protein aggregates and recruitment of autophagic machinery to clear aggregates; but on the other hand, decrease tubulin acetylation and increase tau phosphorylation by decreasing the availability of protein phosphatases for tau dephosphorylation. Therefore, although the initial effect of an increase in HDAC6 levels may be protective, prolonged increases may negatively impact neuronal cell survival in AD and other tauopathies.