Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jnmaLink to Publisher's site
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 November; 99(11): 1262–1270.
PMCID: PMC2574332

Factorial structure of problem behaviors among urban and rural American adolescents.


PURPOSE: The present study was designed to examine the underlying factorial structure of various problem behaviors among diverse populations using data from multiple cohorts of community-based samples of low-income urban African-American and rural Caucasian children and adolescents over multiple years. In this study, we tested the model of a single underlying problem behavior factor against competing models with multiple (and second-order) problem behavior factors. METHOD: The current study employed five data sets, four of which were collected in four consecutive community-based risk assessment or risk-reduction studies among urban low-income African-American children and adolescents in an eastern city in the United States from 1992-1996. The fifth was collected among rural primarily Caucasian adolescents living in Appalachia in 2000. Exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotation was performed to generate the factors underlying various adolescent problem behaviors. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted based on the initial factors generated through the exploratory factor analysis to compare three competing models: single-factor model, multiple-factor model and one-factor second-order model. RESULTS: The data in the current study support the multiple-factor structure of adolescent problem behaviors. At the same time, the data also support the notion of a one-factor-second-order structure underlying various adolescent problem behaviors. The findings were robust across five data sets despite variations in: 1 samples (different cohorts with different demographics and different problem behavior profiles), 2) the types of problem behaviors examined, 3) the methods of data collection (e.g., computer assisted and paper and pencil), and 4) the number of problem behaviors and first-order factors involved. In addition, the results were also robust across gender and age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the single-factor model, the alternative models (i.e., multifactor model and one-factor second-order model) better explained the relationships among various measures of adolescent problem behaviors. The findings in the current study will help us for a better understanding of adolescent risk behaviors and contribute to more effective assessment and prevention intervention efforts.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.9M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Donovan JE, Jessor R. Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985 Dec;53(6):890–904. [PubMed]
  • Donovan JE, Jessor R, Costa FM. Syndrome of problem behavior in adolescence: a replication. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Oct;56(5):762–765. [PubMed]
  • Jessor R. Risk behavior in adolescence: a psychosocial framework for understanding and action. J Adolesc Health. 1991 Dec;12(8):597–605. [PubMed]
  • Farrell AD, Danish SJ, Howard CW. Relationship between drug use and other problem behaviors in urban adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Oct;60(5):705–712. [PubMed]
  • Fisher M, Schneider M, Pegler C, Napolitano B. Eating attitudes, health-risk behaviors, self-esteem, and anxiety among adolescent females in a suburban high school. J Adolesc Health. 1991 Jul;12(5):377–384. [PubMed]
  • Millstein SG, Irwin CE, Jr, Adler NE, Cohn LD, Kegeles SM, Dolcini MM. Health-risk behaviors and health concerns among young adolescents. Pediatrics. 1992 Mar;89(3):422–428. [PubMed]
  • Mott FL, Haurin RJ. Linkages between sexual activity and alcohol and drug use among American adolescents. Fam Plann Perspect. 1988 May-Jun;20(3):128–136. [PubMed]
  • Zabin LS. The association between smoking and sexual behavior among teens in US contraceptive clinics. Am J Public Health. 1984 Mar;74(3):261–263. [PubMed]
  • Zabin LS, Hardy JB, Smith EA, Hirsch MB. Substance use and its relation to sexual activity among inner-city adolescents. J Adolesc Health Care. 1986 Sep;7(5):320–331. [PubMed]
  • Basen-Engquist K, Edmundson EW, Parcel GS. Structure of health risk behavior among high school students. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Aug;64(4):764–775. [PubMed]
  • Gillmore MR, Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Jr, Day LE, Moore M, Abbott R. Structure of problem behaviors in preadolescence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Aug;59(4):499–506. [PubMed]
  • Mitchell CM, Beals J. The structure of problem and positive behavior among American Indian adolescents: gender and community differences. Am J Community Psychol. 1997 Jun;25(3):257–288. [PubMed]
  • Stanton BF, Li X, Ricardo I, Galbraith J, Feigelman S, Kaljee L. A randomized, controlled effectiveness trial of an AIDS prevention program for low-income African-American youths. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Apr;150(4):363–372. [PubMed]
  • Romer D, Stanton B, Galbraith J, Feigelman S, Black MM, Li X. Parental influence on adolescent sexual behavior in high-poverty settings. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Oct;153(10):1055–1062. [PubMed]
  • Li X, Feigelman S, Stanton B, Galbraith J, Huang W. Drug trafficking and drug use among urban African-American adolescents: a causal analysis. J Adolesc Health. 1998 Nov;23(5):280–288. [PubMed]
  • Stanton Bonita, Harris Carole, Cottrell Lesley, Li Xiaoming, Gibson Catherine, Guo Jiantong, Pack Robert, Galbraith Jennifer, Pendleton Sara, Wu Ying, et al. Trial of an urban adolescent sexual risk-reduction intervention for rural youth: a promising but imperfect fit. J Adolesc Health. 2006 Jan;38(1):55–55. [PubMed]
  • Starfield B, Bergner M, Ensminger M, Riley A, Ryan S, Green B, McGauhey P, Skinner A, Kim S. Adolescent health status measurement: development of the Child Health and Illness Profile. Pediatrics. 1993 Feb;91(2):430–435. [PubMed]
  • Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238–246. [PubMed]
  • Jones CL, Battjes RJ. The context and caveats of prevention research on drug abuse. NIDA Res Monogr. 1985;56:1–12. [PubMed]
  • Jaycox Lisa H, McCaffrey Daniel, Eiseman Beth, Aronoff Jessica, Shelley Gene A, Collins Rebecca L, Marshall Grant N. Impact of a school-based dating violence prevention program among Latino teens: randomized controlled effectiveness trial. J Adolesc Health. 2006 Nov;39(5):694–704. [PubMed]
  • Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin EM, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA. 1995 Apr 12;273(14):1106–1112. [PubMed]
  • Hawkins J David, Kosterman Rick, Catalano Richard F, Hill Karl G, Abbott Robert D. Promoting positive adult functioning through social development intervention in childhood: long-term effects from the Seattle Social Development Project. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Jan;159(1):25–31. [PubMed]
  • Wiefferink Carin H, Peters Louk, Hoekstra Femke, Dam Geert Ten, Buijs Goof J, Paulussen Theo G W M. Clustering of health-related behaviors and their determinants: possible consequences for school health interventions. Prev Sci. 2006 Jun;7(2):127–149. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association