CoNS in general and
S. epidermidis in particular are generally considered to be microorganisms with low levels of virulence for humans, usually requiring the presence of a foreign body, such as an intravenous catheter or prosthetic device, to establish an infection. While genes for toxins such as enterotoxins and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 can be found in some CoNS species (
7), they are uncommon in
S. epidermidis and rarely associated with disease syndromes (
14,
16,
24,
28,
32). However, numerous investigators have attempted to identify CoNS that are more virulent in animal models. Claims for the increased virulence of
S. epidermidis versus that of other CoNS and for the increased virulence of specific
S. epidermidis isolates have been made using the rat endocarditis (
1), mouse intraperitoneal inoculation (
23), mouse weight retardation (
12), mouse catheter (
25), and mouse intravenous 50% lethal dose (
13) models. The clinical sources of isolates evaluated in these studies were not always clear, and in most cases, there was no difference in the clinical significance of isolates with high and low levels of virulence. No specific factors or genes were proposed as virulence candidates in any of these studies, and a recent study found no difference in the presence or absence of postulated
S. epidermidis virulence factors between isolates causing infections and commensals (
27). Therefore, our study differs from these earlier reports in that we identified
S. epidermidis isolates obtained under clearly defined clinical conditions and found a marked increase in virulence among those isolates causing an infection, NVE, that is differentiated from other
S. epidermidis infections by its more aggressive and virulent clinical course.
The model that we used to compare the degrees of virulence of
S. epidermidis isolates assessed the abilities of individual isolates to kill the worm
C. elegans. The
C. elegans virulence model was developed by Mahajan-Miklos et al. (
20) to allow them to screen large numbers of isogenic mutants of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa that differed by the presence or absence of specific putative virulence genes. The model has been used successfully by Sifri et al. to assess virulence determinants in
S. aureus (
29). A recent review (
30) has detailed the use of
C. elegans in the study of the virulence of human microbial pathogens. More than 20 bacterial and fungal pathogens have been fed to
C. elegans worms and found to result in the premature death of the worms. Killing has been associated with the accumulation of bacteria in the worms' intestines and by the production of toxins; bacteria do not appear to invade the worm body from the intestine, nor do they invade gut-lining cells. Thus, the mechanisms underlying worm killing are not well-understood. One study associated worm death after the ingestion of
S. aureus or
S. epidermidis with the production of exopolysaccharide (
2) and hypothesized that the exopolysaccharide protected bacteria from
C. elegans innate immune factors and allowed the bacteria to accumulate. However, in the present study, 69% of
S. epidermidis isolates produced abundant (3+) biofilms, 76% made moderate (2+) amounts of exopolysaccharide (PNAG [
21]), and there was no correlation between either biofilm or exopolysaccharide production and worm virulence. Thus, the differences in worm death caused by NVE isolates and other isolates were not likely to be related to the production of PNAG. A major defense mechanism of
C. elegans, which has no professional phagocytic cells, is the secretion of antimicrobial peptides into the intestines (
30). Thus, the number and type of antimicrobial peptide defense systems within the worm intestine may be associated with different rates of survival.
S. epidermidis has been shown to regulate its response to human antimicrobial peptides and to produce a number of factors that help protect the pathogen from the lethal effect of the peptides (
17,
19). In addition, the ability of NVE isolates to cause valve destruction may be related to the production of exoenzymes not previously identified as virulence factors. In fact, one of the factors induced in
S. epidermidis upon exposure to an antimicrobial peptide is a potent protease (
17). These same factors may also cause intestinal toxicity in
C. elegans.
Our study also used MLST to find out if
S. epidermidis isolates of documented clinical significance could be grouped on the basis of their STs. MLST is the typing technique most commonly used for large-scale studies of the evolutionary relationships of
S. aureus genomes (
10). This technique assigns STs on the basis of single nucleotide polymorphisms among a group of stable housekeeping genes located throughout the genome. An international MLST database has been established for
S. epidermidis by using a set of genes, some of which are different from those used for
S. aureus, chosen for their random genomic distribution (
31). MLST has been used successfully to infer a population structure for
S. epidermidis (
22), validating the usefulness of this method in establishing clonal relationships. However, the isolates that we describe in this report differ from the international isolates included in the typing study reported by Miragaia et al. (
22). Even though ST2 was the most common type in both studies, it comprised 31% of the isolates in the study by Miragaia et al. but only 15% of our isolates. Furthermore, 50% of the STs assigned to the isolates in our study were not found among the isolates in the collection of Miragaia et al. This distinction may reflect the relatively small number of isolates that have been typed by the new MLST scheme, or it may be an indication that the two sets of isolates came from different clinical sources. The international set was composed of patient isolates, but their sources were unclear. They were largely nosocomial isolates, and 82% were methicillin resistant. In contrast, our isolates were from defined sources, and 96 were specifically from patients with infective endocarditis, either PVE or NVE. The sources from which these endocarditis isolates originated reflected characteristics reported in the literature: 88% of the PVE isolates were nosocomial and 89% were oxacillin resistant, while only 52% of the NVE isolates were oxacillin resistant and 61% were community acquired. Thus, the different sources of these isolates may explain the unique STs found in our isolates compared to those of Miragaia et al. They may also explain the lack of overlap in STs between our PVE and NVE isolates. Of the 96 total NVE and PVE isolates, only 18 (19%) had STs in common, and 74% of NVE and 71% of PVE isolates had unique STs. In contrast, even though skin and BSI isolates were also, like PVE isolates, largely health care associated, only 12 (27%) of 45 had unique STs. Thus, while MLST analysis did not identify a group of STs that would define the clinical source of an
S. epidermidis isolate, it suggested that
S. epidermidis isolates causing NVE and PVE may be different from each other and from nosocomial isolates routinely recovered from blood culture bottles.
In summary, this study has provided evidence, using both molecular typing and high-throughput virulence testing with C. elegans, that there may be strains of S. epidermidis that are uniquely able to cause a specific human infection. Analyses of these isolates may reveal novel virulence genes for this generally avirulent species.