Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 October 20.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2570345

Review on Genetic Variants and Maternal Smoking in the Etiology of Oral Clefts and Other Birth Defects


A spectrum of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight, and birth defects has been linked with maternal smoking during pregnancy. This article includes a review of studies investigating interactions between genetic variants and maternal smoking in contributing to birth defects using oral clefting as a model birth defect. The primary gene-smoking studies for other major birth defects are also summarized. Gene-environment interaction studies for birth defects are still at an early stage with several mixed results, but evolving research findings have begun to document clinically and developmentally important interactions. As samples and data become increasingly available, more effort is needed in designing innovative analytical methods to study gene-environment interactions.

Keywords: cleft lip, cleft palate, birth defects, smoking, gene-environment interaction


Maternal smoking during pregnancy has been linked with a spectrum of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preterm birth, low birth weight, and birth defects. Among the birth defects, cleft lip and/or palate have been particularly associated with smoking. These facial defects require surgical, nutritional, dental, speech, medical, and behavioral interventions and impose a substantial economic and societal burden. Clefts are common birth defects (birth prevalence ranges from 1/500 to 1/2500, depending on geographic origins) whose etiology includes multiple genetic and environmental factors (Reviewed by Jugessur and Murray, 2005; Lidral and Moreno, 2005). The complex etiology of clefts affords opportunities to identify gene–gene or gene-environment interactions that can shed light on human embryology and its disturbances. This manuscript focuses on oral clefting as a model disease and includes a review of studies investigating interactive effects between genetic variants and maternal smoking. A brief summary of gene-smoking studies for other primary birth defects is also provided.

Oral clefts were historically classified as either those that involve the lip with or without the palate (CL/P) or those that involve the palate only (CPO) (Fraser, 1970). Clefts can also be divided into nonsyndromic (isolated) and syndromic forms. In isolated clefts, affected individuals have no other physical or developmental anomalies. Most studies suggest that about 70% of cases of CL/P and 50% of CPO are nonsyndromic. An environmental component to clefts was recognized when Warkany et al. (1943) associated nutritional deficiencies with cleft palate. Recognized teratogens that contribute to clefts include rare exposures, such as phenytoin and Thalidomide, and also common environmental exposures, such as maternal alcohol or cigarette use (Hayes, 2002). Increased risks from exposures can suggest metabolic pathways whose disruption may play a role in the development of CL/P. Common variables such as alcohol, smoking, or nutrition may have their effects amplified by pharmacogenetic variation. Studies of gene-environment interactions for oral clefts are still at an early stage, but evolving research findings have begun to document clinically and developmentally important interactions.


Common complex traits are presumed to arise under the joint action of genetic and environmental factors. Interaction can be defined either biologically or statistically, and the definition of interaction between two factors is dependent on the underlying model (Ottman, 1990, 1996). Interaction can be measured on an additive or a multiplicative scale with much debate on the choice of scale. Recently, Weinberg (2007) has advocated a log-complement scale for measuring interaction effects, which under some situations may have causal interpretation. Interaction on a multiplicative scale, that is, the differential effect of an exposure on disease risk among individuals with different genotypes, or the differential effect of a genotype on disease risk among individuals with different degrees of exposure, is a commonly used definition, partially due to its simplicity of statistical modeling. This manuscript refers to interaction on a multiplicative scale when mentioning testing for interaction without explicitly defining the scale. A number of study designs and analytical methods have been proposed for testing gene-environment interactive effects, including case–control (Rothman and Greenland, 1998), case-only (Piegorsch et al., 1994), and case-parent (Umbach and Weinberg, 2000) approaches, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, discussed elsewhere (Umbach and Weinberg, 1997, 2000).

It is worth noting that an interaction is different from a joint effect, where the former is a measurement of differential effects of one factor with the changing levels of another factor and the latter measures the effect when the factors are jointly at certain levels. A significant joint effect does not imply a significant interaction and vice versa. Caution needs to be practiced when using the term “interaction”.


Human embryonic development is determined by both the fetal genetic properties and the intrauterine environment, which in turn depends on the maternal genetic attributes and behaviors. Susceptible variants of genes can function through multiple biological scenarios: through fetal genes to increase the susceptibility to diseases, the mother’s genes to cause a less favorable environment for the developing fetus, the interaction between the environmental exposure and fetal or maternal genes, the interaction between the fetal and maternal genes, or through a combination of several scenarios. The essential message is that studying the exposure, fetal and maternal genomes is needed to better understand the pathological processes, which in turn can lead to improved prevention and treatment methods. For such environmental factors as maternal cigarette smoking, variations in the maternal and/or fetal ability to detoxify the exposed compounds may play a role in the causation of diseases. Allelic variants in genes in the detoxification pathway are thus natural candidates for studying gene-smoking interaction effects.


Humans have complex enzymatic mechanisms to detoxify a wide array of xenobiotics absorbed by ingestion, inhalation, or surface contact. The biotransformation of xenobiotics into nonreactive compounds involves two phases. In phase I, a reactive group is added to the parental chemical compound by oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis, or dehalogenation reactions. Generally speaking, phase I reactions result in reactive molecules that may be even more toxic than their parental molecules. The cytochrome P450 gene family is the major phase I enzyme. Phase II reactions are largely considered detoxifying. During this phase, a water-soluble group is added to the reactive site of intermediate compounds by conjugation reactions including glucuronidation, sulfation, and acetyl, glutathione, or amino acid conjugation. As a result, these intermediate compounds are transformed into water-soluble forms which can be excreted. The phase II detoxification enzymes include several gene families, such as epoxide hydrolases, glutathione transferases, arylamine N-acetyltransferases, quinone oxidoreductases, sulfotransferases, and UDP-glycosyltransferases.


AHR-ARNT Pathway

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates endo-, xenobiotic metabolism and cell proliferation and differentiation. One AhR ligand is 2, 3, 7, 8-tetra-chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a teratogen that has been shown to induce cleft palate in mouse, and TCDD is found in tobacco smoke. The binding of TCDD to the Ah receptor leads to translocation of the ligand attached-AhR from cytosol to nucleus, where it interacts with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) to form a heteromeric DNA-binding complex. The formed AhR/ARNT complexes in turn bind to the xenobiotic response element, therefore activating gene transcription. The expression of CYP1A1, a major phase I detoxification enzyme, is regulated by the AhR-ARNT pathway (Whitlock, 1999). AhR is also a player in the signaling pathway that regulates the expression of TGFB genes, major candidate genes for oral clefts, and it was hypothesized that AhR signals might interfere with palatal shelf fusion by down-regulating TGFβ3 signals (Puga et al., 2005). Interestingly, and consistent with the hypothesis, Thomae et al. (2005) reported that the addition of TGFβ3 to dioxin-exposed in vitro palatal culture restored palatal fusion. Mouse embryos from Ahr null mothers were reported to be five times more sensitive to dioxin-induced cleft palate, suggesting potential maternal effects of the AhR gene (Thomae et al., 2004).

Genes in Palate Development Pathways

Because of the complex interplays between genetic and environmental factors, candidate genes for oral clefts are also strong candidates for studying gene-environment interactions (Murray, 2002; Jugessur and Murray, 2005). In fact, one of the candidate genes, TGFA, is the most studied gene for gene-smoking interaction effects on clefting.


The adverse effects of cigarette smoke on cleft development have been demonstrated in several animal studies, both in vitro (Kang and Svoboda, 2003; Saito et al., 2005) and in vivo (Saad et al., 1990; Seller and Bnait, 1995). Cigarette smoke exposure, along with alcohol (Romitti et al., 2007) and nutrition (Yazdy et al., 2007) are the most studied environmental factors in the causes of oral clefts. Positive association between maternal cigarette smoking and CL/P or CPO in their offspring have been reported in several studies (Khoury et al., 1987, 1989; Beaty et al., 1997; Kallen, 1997a; Wyszynski et al., 1997; Chung et al., 2000; Wyszynski and Wu, 2002); nevertheless, this association failed to be confirmed in some other studies (Werler et al., 1990; Christensen et al., 1999; Lieff, 1999; Mitchell et al., 2001). Little et al. (2004) performed a meta-analysis of the association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and oral clefts using data from 24 case–control and cohort studies. A relative risk of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.25–1.34) was found between maternal smoking and CL/P and a relative risk of 1.22 (95% CI: 1.10–1.35) between maternal smoking and CPO. Evidence of a moderate dose-response effect for CL/P was also reported. Using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry, Meyer et al. (2004) found an association between smoking and CPO with a dose response. Studying data collected from National Birth Defect Prevention Study, Honein et al. (2007) reported an odds ratio (OR) of 1.3 (95% CI: 1.0–1.6) for CL/P, an even stronger association with bilateral CL/P (OR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2–2.6), and a weaker association for CPO. An OR of 1.50 (95% CI: 1.05–2.14) for CL/P was reported in a Danish study (Bille et al., 2007). Despite the positive association identified between maternal smoking and clefting in Denmark, the decrease in smoking prevalence among pregnant women in the last 20 years in Denmark did not seem to reduce the rate of cleft prevalence as suggested by the similar occurrence of clefts in 1988–2001 to the occurrence in 1962–1987 (Bille et al., 2005). As hypothesized by the authors, this might be due to the weak causal association between smoking and oral clefting.


Listed below is a review of studies investigating interaction effects of genes and maternal smoking on oral clefts categorized by gene. Table 1 lists a summary of the population, study design, sample, genes, markers and results of these studies in chronological order. All of these studies investigated the joint effects of maternal smoking and genetic variants, although some did not test formally for gene-smoking interactions.

Literature Review of Studies on Gene-Smoking Interaction (GxS) in Oral Clefts


Cytochrome P450 Proteins

The cytochrome P450 related enzymes are important in metabolizing a variety of endogenous and xenobiotic compounds. In humans, 18 CYP families and 43 subfamilies have been identified and 86 human CYP genes, including 27 pseudogenes, have been sequenced (Nelson, 2003). The CYP genes are highly polymorphic with most having multiple functional alleles. CYP1A1 is the most important enzyme in catalyzing smoking metabolites, such as the PAHs and B[α]P, and is induced by TCDD via the AHR-ARNT pathway. CYP1A1 protein expression and enzymatic activities were detected in the first trimester human placenta and the activities were significantly elevated in the placentas of smoking mothers (Collier et al., 2002). Compelling evidence for the presence of constitutive expression of CYP1A1 enzyme in the fetus as early as the first trimester has been shown (Hines and McCarver, 2002). Van Rooij et al. (2001) performed a study using case–control samples collected in the Netherlands and did not find any association between offspring and maternal genotypes and smoking. Shi et al. (2007) also reported a negative finding for CYP1A1-smoking interaction in two large populations. They also studied genetic variants in several other members of the CYP superfamily, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, and CYP2E1, but with no significant interactions identified for any of the CYP genes. Besides their role in detoxification, the CYP class genes may also play a role in the metabolism of endogenous morphogens in the developing fetus, creating another avenue by which variation in them might affect structural development (Stoilov et al., 2001).

Epoxide Hydrolase

Epoxide hydrolases (EPHX) are a class of proteins that catalyze the hydration of chemically reactive epoxides into their corresponding dihydrodiol products. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) plays an important role in both the bio-activation and detoxification of exogenous chemicals such as PAHs, which are present in cigarette smoke. Multiple studies have reported EPHX1 expression and activity in several developing tissues as early as 7.5 weeks gestation (reviewed by McCarver and Hines, 2002). Hartsfield et al. (2001) found no association between the fetal Y113H polymorphism in EPHX1 with maternal smoking and oral clefting. Negative results were also reported by Ramirez et al. (2007), who performed a study based on a larger set of samples. Shi et al. (2007) however did find a significant interaction effect between the EPHX1 Y113H variant in the fetus and maternal smoking on oral clefts in an Iowan population.

Glutathione Transferase Gene Family

Glutathione transferases (GST) are families of dimeric phase II enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of reduced glutathione with electrophilic groups of a wide variety of environmental agents. The reactions carried out by GSTs are generally considered to be detoxifying, which serve to protect cellular molecules from damage caused by cytotoxic and carcinogenic agents (Watson et al., 1998). The currently known soluble human GSTs are categorized into four main classes: alpha, mu, theta, and pi. Null genotypes (caused by deletion of all or part of the gene) have been identified in both GSTM1 and GSTT. GSTM1 is the major gene detoxifying PAHs and has been widely studied in a variety of disorders including many cancers. The frequency of the homozygous GSTM1 deletion varies across populations and is approximately 50% in Caucasians. Joint effects of the GSTM1 deletion polymorphism and maternal smoking on oral clefts have been investigated in four studies, two of which reported negative results (Hartsfield et al., 2001; Shi et al., 2007). Hozyasz (2005) identified an association between maternal GSTM1 deletion and oral clefts in the fetus, but no gene-smoking interaction effects were identified. Lammer et al. (2005) reported an OR of 6.8 (95% CI: 2–24) for CL/P in infants carrying the GSTM1 null genotype and whose mothers smoked ≥20 cigarettes/day.

Two human θ-class isoenzymes, GSTT1 and GSTT2, have been identified, both of which are located on chromosome 22q11.2 separated by approximately 50 kb. The theta class is highly expressed in human adult liver but not in the fetal liver. It is also expressed in a variety of tissues/organs, such as erythrocytes, lung, kidney, brain, skeletal muscles, heart, and small intestine (Landi, 2000). The wide expression of the GSTT1 suggests that it may play a more global role than GSTM1. Although expression of GSTT1 was not detected in embryonic and early fetal tissues in a study by Raijmakers et al. (2001), expression data from the COGENE project showed an elevated expression profile for GSTT1 at the craniofacial regions during embryonic development (Shi et al., 2007). Similar to the GSTM1 deletion, the prevalence of the GSTT1 deletion varies across populations 15%–20% homozygous for the deletion in Caucasians. Significant joint effects of the GSTT1 deletion and maternal cigarette smoking on oral clefts were reported in several studies. Van Rooij et al. (2001) reported increased risk of having a cleft child in GSTT1-null mothers who smoked during pregnancy, OR = 3.2 (95% CI: 0.9–11.6). They also reported an OR of 1.9 (95% CI: 0.5–6.6) for oral clefts in mothers who smoked and had an infant with the GSTT1-null genotype and an OR of 4.9 (95% CI: 0.7–36.9) in mothers who smoked where both the mother and the infant were homozygous for the GSTT1-deletion allele compared with nonsmoking mothers where both the mother and the infant were noncarriers of the GSTT1 deletion. Using samples from a case–control study in California, Lammer et al. (2005) found an increased risk for CL/P in smoker mothers whose infants were carrying the GSTT1 null genotype OR = 2.9 (95% CI: 1.2–7.2). The joint effects of the GSTT1 null genotype and maternal smoking on clefting, however, were not found in a study from Poland (Hozyasz et al., 2005). Using samples collected from two populations, Shi et al. (2007) reported significant interaction between maternal smoking and offspring GSTT1-null genotype in a Danish population (p value for interaction is 0.03) and an Iowan population (p value for interaction is 0.002). In the combined samples, the joint effects of GSTT1 and maternal smoking were reported to be OR = 2.23 (95% CI: 1.20–3.71) for all cleft cases, and the effects were most elevated for CPO with an OR of 4.25 (95% CI: 1.51–7.33). Interestingly, Shaw et al. (2003) detected an elevated relative risk, also for CPO, in infants with the GSTT1 null genotype and whose mothers were exposed to certain occupational chemicals.

GSTP1 is another major enzyme involved in the inactivation of cigarette smoke metabolites. It is widely expressed in normal human epithelial tissue and is particularly abundant in the lung, esophagus, and placenta, and it is reported to be the most important GST isoform at the embryonic and early fetal developmental stages (Raijmakers et al., 2001). Elevated expression of GSTP1 was detected in both embryos at 8-weeks gestation (Robertson et al., 1986; Raijmakers et al., 2001) and fetuses at 12-week of gestation (Raijmakers et al., 2001). Overexpression of GSTP1 in a variety of tumors has been reported. Mice with deleted Gst-π gene cluster (Gst-π1, and Gst-π2), when treated with PAH 7,12-dimethylbenz anthracene and 12-o-tetracannoylphorbol-13-acetate, showed a highly significant increased rate of papillomas (Henderson et al., 1998). This suggests that variable GSTP1 expression may be an important determinant of susceptibility to environmental chemicals. Significant interaction between offspring GSTP1 and maternal smoking for CL/P was reported by Shi et al. (2007), but this interaction effect was not found by Ramirez et al. (2007). Shi et al. (2007) also studied two other members of the GST family, GSTA4 and GSTM3, and reported significant interaction between offspring GSTA4 and maternal smoking for CPO in a Danish population.

Hypoxia-Induced Factor-1

One mechanism by which maternal cigarette smoking may affect embryonic development is through hypoxia, possibly caused by the production of carbon monoxide which interferes with oxygen transfer to the placenta, or nicotine which constricts the uterine wall resulting in hypoxia (Philipp et al., 1984). Experiments in mice also supported the involvement of hypoxia in cleft lip (CL) pathogenesis, in that hypoxia increases the rate of CL in mouse strains with a spontaneous rate of CL while hyperoxia decreases the rate (Millicovsky and Johnston, 1981a, b). HIF1A, a member of the bHLH/PAS family, is a master enzyme involved in the cellular responses to hypoxia. HIF1A regulates the expression of genes involved in energy metabolism, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. Hif1a knockout mouse embryos die in mid-gestation, showing cardiovascular malformations and open neural tube defects (Iyer et al., 1998). Cross-talk between the HIF1A/ARNT and AHR/ARTN pathways has also been hypothesized (Puga et al., 2005). Shi et al. (2007) reported significant interaction between fetal HIF1A and maternal smoking in an Iowan population but no association with AHR.

Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase Gene Family

Aromatic amines such as 4-aminobiphenyl and heterocyclic amines such as PhIP are present in cigarette smoke. N-conjugation of arylamine by the action of N-acetyltransferases (NATs), UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), or sulfotransferases (SULTs) produces nontoxic compounds. In humans, two arylamine N-acetyltransferases, NAT1 and NAT2, and a pseudogene, NATP1, have been identified which are located at chromosome 8p23.1-8p21.3. NAT2 has a limited distribution found in the liver and epithelial cells of the intestine, while NAT1 is expressed in many tissues, including erythrocytes, bladder, lymphocytes, neural tissues, liver, and intestines. Expression of NAT1 was found as early as blastocyst stage and in human placenta at 5.5 gestational weeks (Sim et al., 2000; Smelt et al., 2000). Acetylation activity in humans varies dramatically across different populations, which may be attributable to the fact that both NAT1 and NAT2 are highly polymorphic with more than 25 alleles identified in each. Several investigations of the joint effects of NAT genes and oral clefts have been conducted. Van Rooij et al. (2002) studied the potential association between maternal NAT2 acetylator status and births with oral clefts as well as the possible interaction between maternal NAT2 and maternal smoking in clefting. No significant effects for either maternal acetylator status alone or its interactions with smoking were detected. Lammer et al. (2004) in a California population-based case–control study did not find independent associations for either NAT1 or NAT2 variants with maternal smoking in clefting. They did find an OR of 3.9 (95% CI: 1.1–17.2) for CL/P among mothers who smoked and whose infants had the NAT1 1088 genotype AA versus nonsmoking mothers whose infants had the TT genotype, and OR = 4.2 (95% CI: 1.2–18.0) for smoking mothers with infants of NAT1 1095 genotype AA versus nonsmoking mothers with infants of CC genotypes. No significant joint effects of NAT2 and smoking were reported by Lammer et al. (2004). Significant interaction effects were nonetheless reported by Shi et al. (2007) between a maternal NAT2 variant and maternal smoking in a Danish population.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) plays a key role in the metabolism of folate by reducing methylenetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, the primary methyl donor for methionine synthesis. The C677T nucleotide variant in the MTHFR gene results in an amino acid variation encoding a thermally unstable protein with reduced activity resulting in elevated plasma homocysteine levels. Considerable heterogeneity in the prevalence of the C677T polymorphism throughout the world has been reported (Pepe et al., 1998; Botto and Yang, 2000). Joint effects of MTHFR C677T variant and maternal smoking have been studied in cleft cases from a US population (Beaty et al., 2002) and a Norwegian population (Jugessur et al., 2003), with negative results in both studies.

Other Metabolic Genes

Shi et al. (2007) also studied several other detoxification genes, including: NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), a flavoenzyme that catalyzes two-electron reduction of quinone compounds to hydroquinone and is inducible by oxidative stress, dioxin, and PAHs found in cigarette smoke; SULT1A1 which catalyzes the transfer of the sulfonate group from the active sulfate to a substrate to form the respective sulfate or sulfamate ester; and UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs) UGT1A7, an enzyme that catalyzes the conjugation reactions where hydrophobic chemicals are transformed into water-soluble compounds. They did not detect effects for either NQO1 or SULT1A1. Both maternal genetic effect and maternal gene-smoking interaction effect were seen for variants in UGT1A7 but in a different direction. Interestingly, Collier et al. (2002) reported a significant elevation of UGT1A activity in the first trimester placenta of mothers who smoked (Collier et al., 2002), lending support for potential maternal effects of UGT1A7 on embryonic development. Potential interaction between a fetal variant in UGT1A7 and maternal smoking was also reported (Shi and Christensen et al., 2007). Shaw et al. (2005a, b) studied endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3), which regulates nitric oxide production and may be involved in folate catabolism. They reported an OR of 1.6 (95% CI: 1.0–2.6) for CL/P in smoking mothers with NOS3 A(−922)G homozygote infants. Increased risk for CL/P was observed in smoking mothers who did not use vitamins and whose infants had at least one variant allele (for SNP A(−922)G, OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 2.1–10.2; for SNP 894T, OR = 4.4, 95% CI: 1.8–10.7). Test for NOS3-smoking interaction was not significant.


Transforming Growth Factor α (TGFA)

TGFA is a trans-membrane protein that is expressed at the medial edge epithelium (MEE) of fusing palatal shelves. Its receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is strongly expressed in the degenerating MEE. Even though Tgfa null mice do not exhibit craniofacial anomalies, mice with Egfr deleted are born with open-eyes and facial medio-lateral defects including high incidence of cleft palate (Miettinen et al., 1999). Ardinger et al. (1989) first associated the TaqI polymorphism in TGFA with CL/P in a case–control study. Many more studies on TGFA have been performed since then, but with conflicting results (reviewed by Vieira, 2006). TGFA is the most extensively studied gene for gene-environment interaction effects on oral clefts. Significant interaction between TGFA TaqI variant and maternal smoking was first reported by Hwang et al. (1995) by analyzing data from a case–control study in Maryland, US. An increased risk for CPO (OR = 7.02, 95% CI: 1.78–27.6) was observed in smoking mothers with infants carrying the TGFA TaqI C2/C2 genotype. Analyzing data from a case-parent study, Maestri et al. (1997) also reported a significant TGFA-smoking interaction. Even though the test for interaction was not significant in a California case–control study, elevated risk for TGFA TaqI C2-allele carrier in smoking mothers was observed, with OR = 6.1 (95% CI: 1.1–36.1) for CL/P and OR = 9 (95% CI: 1.4–61.9) for CPO (Shaw et al., 1996). Negative results were also reported in several studies (Beaty et al., 1997; Christensen et al., 1999; Romitti et al., 1999; Beaty et al., 2002; Jugessur et al., 2003). Zeiger et al. (2005) performed a meta-analysis and reported an increased risk (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.22–3.10) for CPO in smoker mothers if the infant carried the TaqI C2 allele.

Transforming Growth Factor β 3

The TGF β family consists of over 30 ligands, regulating a wide variety of biological processes including proliferation, differentiation, epithelium-mesenchymal transformation, and apoptosis. Expression of one of the family members, transforming growth factor β 3 (TGFB3), is detected in the epithelial component of the vertical palatal shelf and peaks at day 14 to 14.5, just before immediate contact of the palatal shelves. Potential roles of TGFβ3 in palate formation have been demonstrated both in vitro (Sun and Vanderburg et al., 1998; Gato et al., 2002; Cui et al., 2003) and in vivo (Cui et al., 2003). Using a case-parent study design, Maestri el al. (1997) identified significant interaction between maternal smoking and a TGFB3 variant in the offspring (p value for interaction = 0.04). An elevated risk for CPO in mothers who smoked >10 cigarettes/day and whose infants were TGFB3 variant allele carriers was reported by Romitti (1999). Studies by Mitchell (2001) and Beaty (2002) identified only genetic main effects for TGFβ3 but no interaction effects.

Muscle Segment Homeobox 1

Muscle segment homeobox 1 (MSX1) is a transcriptional repressor which is important in craniofacial, limb, and nervous system development. In mice, Msx1 is expressed in the palatal mesenchyme confined to the anterior portion of the developing palatal shelves (Alappat et al., 2003) and all Msx1 homozygous −/− mice manifest cleft secondary palate, where the paired palatal shelves elevate normally but fail to make contact and fuse, a phenotype mimicking cleft palate in human. Potential involvement of MSX1 in the etiology of clefting has been demonstrated in several sequencing (van den Boogaard et al., 2000; Alappat et al., 2003; Jezewski et al., 2003) and association studies (Lidral et al., 1997; Jumlongras et al., 2001; Vieira et al., 2003; Schultz et al., 2004). Mitchell et al. (2001) studied variants in MSX1 and maternal smoking using a Danish case–control study and did not find genetic main or interaction effects. However, an elevated risk for CPO was observed in mothers who smoked >10 cigarettes/day and whose infants were MSX1 variant carriers in an Iowan population based case–control study (Romitti et al., 1999) and significant interaction (p value for interaction = 0.028) was reported in a Maryland case-parent study (Beaty et al., 2002).

Other Developmental Genes

Gene-smoking interaction effects have been investigated for some other candidate genes, such as retinoic acid receptor (Maestri et al., 1997), and the proto-oncogene (BCL3) (Maestri et al., 1997; Beaty et al., 2002), all with negative results.


Several studies have evaluated the role of maternal smoking on other birth defects besides oral clefting. While some consensus has emerged for some birth defects, the results are rather mixed for others, likely due to different designs, sample sizes, and different extents of confounding bias. Listed below is a summary of the results for the other most common birth defects.

Congenital Heart Disease

A few studies have evaluated the effects of smoking on Congenital heart disease (CHD) but without strong evidence that smoking has a large risk effect on CHD. A study using Swedish registry data found a small effect of smoking (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01–1.19) on CHD, but larger effects were observed for specific types including atrial septal defects and persistent ductus arteriosus (Kallen, 1999a). Using a population based case–control sample from California, a larger effect was observed for conotruncal heart defects with both parents being smokers compared to none (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2–3.1), but maternal smoking had no significant effect by itself (Wasserman et al., 1996).

There have been few studies of interactions between smoking and selected genetic variants but some suggestive interactions have been reported. Larger joint risk effects of maternal smoking and the null type of NOS3 A(−922)G (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1–3.4) and glu298asp (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2–4.0) on conotruncal heart defects were observed using the California sample (Shaw et al., 2005a, b). Using a case–control sample from Arkansas, smoking had a moderate effect on CHD (1.7 OR; 95% CI: 0.95–3.14), significant joint effects between smoking, and high homocysteine levels (OR = 11.8; 95% CI: 2.59–53.3) were observed relative to nonsmoking and low homocysteine for the subgroup with the CC genotype of MTHFR 677C>T (Hobbs et al., 2006).

Neural Tube Defects

The few studies that have evaluated the effects of smoking on Neural tube defects (NTDs) suggest no or minimal adverse risk effect on NTDs. Using a Swedish registry sample, Kallen (1998) reported a protective effect of smoking on NTDs (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61–0.91), but no effects of smoking were observed with the California sample (Wasserman and Shaw et al., 1996). Interaction between smoking and fetal NAT1 C1095A variant has been reported using a family-based study with larger risk effects of smoking on spina bifida in infants carrying the 1095A allele (Jensen et al., 2005). One recent study (Suarez et al., 2007) did find effects of maternal smoking on NTD risk in a Mexican-American population.

Limb Defects

An increased risk of terminal transverse limb deficiency (OR = 1.48; 95% CI: 0.98–2.23) was reported with maternal smoking using a case–control sample from a Hungarian birth registry (Czeizel et al., 1994). Maternal smoking had no significant effects on limb deficiency using the California sample but intensive paternal smoking (≥20 cigarettes/day) doubled the risk (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3–3.6) (Wasserman et al., 1996). Using the Swedish registry sample, maternal smoking was reported to increase the risk (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.06–1.50) (Kallen, 1997b). In a recent study grouping polydactyly, syndactyly, and adactyly, maternal smoking was reported to increase the birth defect risk (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.18–1.45) though this grouping of limb defects has been criticized for its heterogeneity (Kirby, 2006).

Significant joint effects of active maternal smoking with homozygote variant allele of NAT1 1095 (OR = 7.5; 95% CI: 1.2–45.3), NAT1 1088 (OR = 16.9; 95% CI: 1.7–166.2), and null-type GSTT1 (OR = 7.0; 95% CI: 1.2–40.1) in fetus on limb deficiency defects relative to nonsmoking and wild-type alleles have been reported using the California registry case–control sample (Carmichael et al., 2006a, b). Significant joint effects of secondhand smoking and NAT1 1088 (OR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.0–11.9), heterozygote NOS3 A(−922)G (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.0–7.2), and heterozygote NOS3 G894T (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.0–7.2) were also reported. Using the same sample, Carmichael et al. (2006a, b) reported significant joint effects between maternal smoking and a β-2 adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) variant (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.0–3.8). In the same study, they also reported significant joint effects between smoking, lack of vitamin use and variants in several genes, including serpin peptidase inhibitor (SERPINE1 11053G>T) (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.0–8.8), integrin, α 2 (ITGA2 873G>A) (OR = 3.5; 95% CI: 1.0–12.0), G protein β 3 subunit (GNB3 825C>T) (OR = 3.3; 95% CI: 1.0–11.3), and ADRB2 Arg16Gly (OR = 3.9; 95% CI: 1.2–12.6). These variants are implicated in blood pressure. No interaction between smoking and MSX1 was found using the same sample (Carmichael et al., 2004).


Gastroschisis is of particular interest for environmental exposures as it is associated with both low maternal age and has been increasing in birth prevalence over the last two decades (Alvarez and Burd, 2007). There is no consensus of a large risk effect of maternal smoking on gastroschisis. A few case–control studies have showed an increased risk for smoking. Using a sample from Washington State, Goldbaum et al. (1990) reported a significant doubled risk with smoking (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.03–3.8). A similar but statistically insignificant risk estimate was reported using a case–control sample from Maine (Haddow et al., 1993) (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.9–4.8).1 However, no significant effect of maternal smoking was observed using a sample from the California birth defects registry (Torfs et al., 1994). Werler et al. (1992) also reported no effects of smoking in a case–control study that used as controls infants with other malformations.2

Significant joint effects between smoking and variants in NOS3 glu298asp (OR = 5.2; 95% CI: 2.4–11.4), intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1 gly24larg) (OR = 5.2; 95% CI: 2.1–12.7), and atrial natriuretic peptide (NPPA 2238 T > C) (OR = 6.4; 95% CI: 2.8–14.6) were reported using the California sample (Torfs et al., 2006). The ICAM1 variant was related to peripheral arterial disease and the NPPA variant was related to cardiac hypertrophy. Significant joint effects between BMI and intensive smoking (defined by smoking more than one pack per day or smoking marijuana more than once within 3 months before pregnancy) have also been reported (OR = 26.5; 95% CI: 7.9–89.4) relative to mothers without either risk factor (Lam and Torfs, 2006).

Other Birth Defects

Smoking has been reported to increase the risk of craniosynostosis in three case–control studies using samples from Colorado (Alderman et al., 1994), Sweden (Kallen, 1999b) (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.27–2.18 for isolated forms), and Atlanta (Honein and Rasmussen, 2000) (OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.01–3.66 for isolated forms). A dose response effect was suggested but not confirmed in these studies which had also mixed findings for the types of craniosynostosis that are likely to be mostly affected by smoking (sagittal versus coronal). No effects of smoking was reported in a case–control study involving samples from the Baltimore-Washington area, including sagittal craniocynostosis cases (Zeiger and et al., 2002). There have been no studies of gene-smoking interactions for craniocynostosis.

Maternal smoking has been reported to slightly increase the overall risk (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02–1.29) of having multiple malformations using the Swedish registry data (Kallen, 2000). This risk increased with intensive smoking (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.13–1.58 for smoking ≥10 cigarettes per day). Smoking has not been shown to increase the risk of Down Syndrome (Chen et al., 1999), but an increased risk has been reported for heart defects (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2–3.2) among births with Down Syndrome, particularly for atrioventricular canal, tetralogy of Fallot, and atrial septal defects (Torfs and Christianson, 1999).


Investigations into gene-smoking interactions in birth defects have produced some insightful and interesting results; however, failure of replication and conflicting results are still major unresolved issues. Many of these studies, both positive and negative, are limited by a small sample size; consequently, comprehensive investigations of environment and gene-environment interactive effects with a larger sample size are needed. Multi-institutional collaborations such as the International Clearing-house for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (Botto et al., 2006), ECLAMC (Castilla and Orioli, 2004), and CDC sponsored Birth Defects Prevention Study (Yoon and Rasmussen, 2001) have already been successful in providing large, epidemiologic datasets for analysis, and in some settings have added DNA samples as well. Comprehensive collaborations between institutions and investigators can provide the large sample sizes required by studies of gene-environment interactions. The recently initiated Gene Association Information Network (GAIN) and Genes, Environment, and Health Initiative (GEI) are steps in the direction of promoting such collaborations that can also include genome wide association studies that can move past candidate gene analysis to search for common variants contributing to disease with no constricting, underlying models (Christensen and Murray, 2007). GAIN is a public–private partnership established to investigate the genetics of complex disease through a series of whole genome association studies, using samples from existing case–control studies (Manolio et al., 2007). GEI is a unique collaboration between geneticists and environmental scientists, which will take advantage of the innovative genetic technology as well as new instrument for measuring environmental factors to understand the genetic contributions and gene-environment interactions in common diseases. They provide new models of collaboration, data sharing, and intellectual protection. Such studies will also require accurate phenotyping and subphenotyping to maximize power, as has been demonstrated by several cleft studies (Rahimov et al., 2007; Suzuki et al., 2007).

In addition to adequate sample size, assessment of gene-environment interaction effects also depends upon the accurate and detailed measurement of exposures and the proper statistical evaluation. New methods of environmental variable measures that can be noninvasive and longitudinal will enhance detection efforts (Schwartz and Collins, 2007). One important limitation that is common to previous studies is self-selection on smoking based in part on risk preferences and anticipated pregnancy outcomes which might result in biased estimates of the effects of smoking. Genetic instrumental variable models are being applied to address self-selection when estimating the average and interactive effects on smoking (Wehby et al., 2007). These present a promising approach that can also be adopted for studying interactions between smoking and genetic factors.

Case–control is the traditional design for investigating gene-environment interactions. Interactions on either an additive or a multiplicative scale can be estimated using such a design; this design is however susceptible to population stratification. Case-only design is more powerful in detecting interaction on a multiplicative scale, but it cannot test for exposure main effects and its validity heavily relies on the assumption that gene and environment are independent in the control population. Case-parent design has the robustness to population stratification, but similar to case-only design it forfeits the ability to detect exposure main effects and it can only study interaction on a multiplicative scale. A hybrid design that can combine the advantages of the case–control and case-parent designs is desired. As samples and data become more available, the challenges will shift more towards identifying more efficient and robust statistical and analytical methods and approaches to interpret the results.

Interactions between genes, environments, and behaviors will continue to be a growing field to identify health risk factors that can be modified through policy or behavioral interventions. Studying the role of interactions with maternal smoking in adverse birth outcomes such as birth defects is one area with substantial successes and that can benefit significantly from further work.


We thank the many people who have helped over the years including patients, colleagues and students and especially Drs. Kaare Christensen, Mary Marazita, Andrew Lidral, Paul Romitti, Allen Wilcox, Clarice Weinberg, and Rolv Terje Lie.

Grant sponsor: Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Services; Grant numbers: R03 DE018394-01, 1R01DD000295-01, P50 DE-16215, R37 DE-08559, and 2P30 EY-5605.


1This study involved 22 cases and about 58, 559 controls.

2Using a birth defect sample as a control is problematic given that smoking may contribute to these birth defects as well, and so finding no effects of smoking in this design is not sufficient to suggest that smoking has no effect on gastroschisis.

Contributor Information

Min Shi, Biostatistics Branch, NIEHS, NIH, DHHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

George L. Wehby, Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Jeffrey C. Murray, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.


  • Alappat S, Zhang ZY, Chen YP. Msx homeobox gene family and craniofacial development. Cell Res. 2003;13:429–442. [PubMed]
  • Alderman BW, Bradley CM, Greene C, et al. Increased risk of craniosynostosis with maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Teratology. 1994;50:13–18. [PubMed]
  • Alvarez SM, Burd RS. Increasing prevalence of gastroschis repairs in the United States: 1996–2003. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:943–946. [PubMed]
  • Ardinger HH, Buetow KH, Bell GI, et al. Association of genetic variation of the transforming growth factor-alpha gene with cleft lip and palate. Am J Hum Genet. 1989;45:348–353. [PubMed]
  • Beaty TH, Hetmanski JB, Zeiger JS, et al. Testing candidate genes for non-syndromic oral clefts using a case-parent trio design. Genet Epidemiol. 2002;22:1–11. [PubMed]
  • Beaty TH, Maestri NE, Hetmanski JB, et al. Testing for interaction between maternal smoking and TGFA genotype among oral cleft cases born in Maryland 1992–1996. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:447–454. [PubMed]
  • Bille C, Knudsen LB, Christensen K. Changing lifestyles and oral clefts occurrence in Denmark. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42:255–259. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bille C, Olsen J, Vach W, et al. Oral clefts and life style factors–a case-cohort study based on prospective Danish data. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:173–181. [PubMed]
  • Botto LD, Robert-Gnansia E, Siffel C, et al. Fostering international collaboration in birth defects research and prevention: a perspective from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:774–780. [PubMed]
  • Botto LD, Yang Q. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and congenital anomalies: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:862–877. [PubMed]
  • Carmichael SL, Shaw GM, Iovannisci DM, et al. Risks of human limb deficiency anomalies associated with 29 SNPs of genes involved in homocysteine metabolism, coagulation, cell–cell interactions, inflammatory response, and blood pressure regulation. Am J Med Genet A. 2006a;140:2433–2440. [PubMed]
  • Carmichael SL, Shaw GM, Yang W, et al. Risk of limb deficiency defects associated with NAT1, NAT2, GSTT1, GSTM1, and NOS3 genetic variants, maternal smoking, and vitamin supplement intake. Am J Med Genet A. 2006b;140:1915–1922. [PubMed]
  • Carmichael SL, Shaw GM, Yang W, et al. Limb deficiency defects, MSX1, and exposure to tobacco smoke. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;125:285–289. [PubMed]
  • Castilla EE, Orioli IM. ECLAMC: the Latin-American collaborative study of congenital malformations. Community Genet. 2004;7:76–94. [PubMed]
  • Chen CL, Gilbert TJ, Daling JR. Maternal smoking and Down syndrome: the confounding effect of maternal age. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149:442–446. [PubMed]
  • Christensen K, Murray JC. What genome-wide association studies can do for medicine. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1094–1097. [PubMed]
  • Christensen K, Olsen J, Norgaard-Pedersen B, et al. Oral clefts, transforming growth factor alpha gene variants, and maternal smoking: a population-based case–control study in Denmark, 1991–1994. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149:248–255. [PubMed]
  • Chung KC, Kowalski CP, Kim HM, Buchman SR. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and the risk of having a child with cleft lip/palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:485–491. [PubMed]
  • Collier AC, Tingle MD, Paxton JW, et al. Metabolizing enzyme localization and activities in the first trimester human placenta: the effect of maternal and gestational age, smoking and alcohol consumption. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2564–2572. [PubMed]
  • Cui XM, Chai Y, Chen J, et al. TGF-beta3-dependent SMAD2 phosphorylation and inhibition of MEE proliferation during palatal fusion. Dev Dyn. 2003;227:387–394. [PubMed]
  • Czeizel AE, Kodaj I, Lenz W. Smoking during pregnancy and congenital limb deficiency. Bmj. 1994;308:1473–1436. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fraser FC. The genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate. Am J Hum Genet. 1970;22:336–352. [PubMed]
  • Gato A, Martinez ML, Tudela C, et al. TGF-beta(3)-induced chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan mediates palatal shelf adhesion. Dev Biol. 2002;250:393–405. [PubMed]
  • Goldbaum G, Daling J, Milham S. Risk factors for gastroschisis. Teratology. 1990;42:397–403. [PubMed]
  • Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Holman MS. Young maternal age and smoking during pregnancy as risk factors for gastroschisis. Teratology. 1993;47:225–228. [PubMed]
  • Hartsfield JK, Jr, Hickman TA, Everett ET, et al. Analysis of the EPHX1 113 polymorphism and GSTM1 homozygous null polymorphism and oral clefting associated with maternal smoking. Am J Med Genet. 2001;102:21–24. [PubMed]
  • Hayes C. Environmental risk factors and oral clefts. Cleft lip and palate: from origin to treatment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.
  • Henderson CJ, Smith AG, Ure J, et al. Increased skin tumorigenesis in mice lacking pi class glutathione S-transferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:5275–5280. [PubMed]
  • Hines RN, McCarver DG. The ontogeny of human drug-metabolizing enzymes: phase I oxidative enzymes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;300:355–360. [PubMed]
  • Hobbs CA, James SJ, Jernigan S, et al. Congenital heart defects, maternal homocysteine, smoking, and the 677 C>T polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: evaluating gene-environment interactions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:218–224. [PubMed]
  • Honein MA, Rasmussen SA. Further evidence for an association between maternal smoking and craniosynostosis. Teratology. 2000;62:145–146. [PubMed]
  • Honein MA, Rasmussen SA, Reefhuis J, et al. Maternal smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure and the risk of orofacial clefts. Epidemiology. 2007;18:226–233. [PubMed]
  • Hozyasz KK, Mostowska A, Surowiec Z, Jagodzinksi PP. [Genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in mothers of children with isolated cleft lip with or without cleft palate] Przegl Lek. 2005;62:1019–1022. [PubMed]
  • Hwang SJ, Beaty TH, Panny SR, et al. Association study of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha) TaqI polymorphism and oral clefts: indication of gene-environment interaction in a population-based sample of infants with birth defects. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:629–636. [PubMed]
  • Iyer NV, Leung SW, Semenza GL. The human hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha gene: HIF1A structure and evolutionary conservation. Genomics. 1998;52:159–165. [PubMed]
  • Jensen LE, Hoess K, Whitehead AS, Mitchell LE. The NAT1 C1095A polymorphism, maternal multivitamin use and smoking, and the risk of spina bifida. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2005;73:512–516. [PubMed]
  • Jezewski PA, Vieira AR, Nishimura C, et al. Complete sequencing shows a role for MSX1 in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. J Med Genet. 2003;40:399–407. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jugessur A, Lie RT, Wilcox AJ, et al. Cleft palate, transforming growth factor alpha gene variants, and maternal exposures: assessing gene-environment interactions in case-parent triads. Genet Epidemiol. 2003;25:367–374. [PubMed]
  • Jugessur A, Murray JC. Orofacial clefting: recent insights into a complex trait. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15:270–278. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jumlongras D, Bei M, Stimson JM, et al. A nonsense mutation in MSX1 causes Witkop syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:67–74. [PubMed]
  • Kallen K. Maternal smoking and orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 1997a;34:11–16. [PubMed]
  • Kallen K. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and limb reduction malformations in Sweden. Am J Public Health. 1997b;87:29–32. [PubMed]
  • Kallen K. Maternal smoking, body mass index, and neural tube defects. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:1103–1111. [PubMed]
  • Kallen K. Maternal smoking and congenital heart defects. Eur J Epidemiol. 1999a;15:731–737. [PubMed]
  • Kallen K. Maternal smoking and craniosynostosis. Teratology. 1999b;60:146–150. [PubMed]
  • Kallen K. Multiple malformations and maternal smoking. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000;14:227–233. [PubMed]
  • Kang P, Svoboda KK. Nicotine inhibits palatal fusion and modulates nicotinic receptors and the PI-3 kinase pathway in medial edge epithelia. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6:129–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Khoury MJ, Gomez M-Farias, Mulinare J. Does maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy cause cleft lip and palate in offspring? Am J Dis Child. 1989;143:333–337. [PubMed]
  • Khoury MJ, Weinstein A, Panny S, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking and oral clefts: a population-based study. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:623–625. [PubMed]
  • Kirby RS. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and congenital digital anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1667–1668. [PubMed]
  • Lam PK, Torfs CP. Interaction between maternal smoking and malnutrition in infant risk of gastroschisis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76:182–186. [PubMed]
  • Lammer EJ, Shaw GM, Iovannisci DM, Finnell RH. Maternal smoking, genetic variation of glutathione s-transferases, and risk for orofacial clefts. Epidemiology. 2005;16:698–701. [PubMed]
  • Lammer EJ, Shaw GM, Iovannisci DM, et al. Maternal smoking and the risk of orofacial clefts: Susceptibility with NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms. Epidemiology. 2004;15:150–156. [PubMed]
  • Landi S. Mammalian class theta GST and differential susceptibility to carcinogens: a review. Mutat Res. 2000;463:247–283. [PubMed]
  • Lidral AC, Moreno LM. Progress toward discerning the genetics of cleft lip. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;17:731–739. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lidral AC, Murray JC, Buetow KH, et al. Studies of the candidate genes TGFB2, MSX1, TGFA, and TGFB3 in the etiology of cleft lip and palate in the Philippines. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 1997;34:1–6. [PubMed]
  • Lieff SOA, Werler M, Strauss RP, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and risk of oral clefts in newborns. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:683–694. [PubMed]
  • Little J, Cardy A, Munger RG. Tobacco smoking and oral clefts: a meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:213–218. [PubMed]
  • Maestri NE, Beaty TH, Hetmanski J, et al. Application of transmission disequilibrium tests to nonsyndromic oral clefts: including candidate genes and environmental exposures in the models. Am J Med Genet. 1997;73:337–344. [PubMed]
  • Manolio TA, Rodriguez LL, Brooks L, et al. New models of collaboration in genome-wide association studies: the Genetic Association Information Network. Nature genetics. 2007;39:1045–1051. [PubMed]
  • McCarver DG, Hines RN. The ontogeny of human drug-metabolizing enzymes: phase II conjugation enzymes and regulatory mechanisms. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;300:361–366. [PubMed]
  • Meyer KA, Williams P, Hernandez-Diaz S, Cnattingius S. Smoking and the risk of oral clefts: exploring the impact of study designs. Epidemiology. 2004;15:671–678. [PubMed]
  • Miettinen PJ, Chin JR, Shum L, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor function is necessary for normal craniofacial development and palate closure. Nat Genet. 1999;22:69–73. [PubMed]
  • Millicovsky G, Johnston MC. Hyperoxia and hypoxia in pregnancy: simple experimental manipulation alters the incidence of cleft lip and palate in CL/Fr mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981a;78:5722–5723. [PubMed]
  • Millicovsky G, Johnston MC. Maternal hyperoxia greatly reduces the incidence of phenytoin-induced cleft lip and palate in A/J mice. Science. 1981b;212:671–672. [PubMed]
  • Mitchell LE, Murray JC, O’Brien S, Christensen K. Evaluation of two putative susceptibility loci for oral clefts in the Danish population. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:1007–1015. [PubMed]
  • Murray JC. Gene/environment causes of cleft lip and/or palate. Clin Genet. 2002;61:248–256. [PubMed]
  • Nelson DR. Cytochrome P450 Database. 2003.
  • Ottman R. An epidemiologic approach to gene-environment interaction. Genet Epidemiol. 1990;7:177–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ottman R. Gene-environment interaction: definitions and study designs. Prev Med. 1996;25:764–770. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pepe G, Camacho Vanegas O, Giusti B, et al. Heterogeneity in world distribution of the thermolabile C677T mutation in 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:917–920. [PubMed]
  • Philipp K, Pateisky N, Endler M. Effects of smoking on uteroplacental blood flow. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1984;17:179–182. [PubMed]
  • Piegorsch WW, Weinberg CR, Taylor JA. Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. Stat Med. 1994;13:153–162. [PubMed]
  • Puga A, Tomlinson CR, Xia Y. Ah receptor signals cross-talk with multiple developmental pathways. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005;69:199–207. [PubMed]
  • Rahimov F, Hitchler MJ, Domann FE, et al. Disruption of an AP-2 binding site upstream of IRF6 is commonly associated with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. 57th annual meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics; San Diego, CA, USA. 2007.
  • Raijmakers MT, Steegers EA, Peters WH. Glutathione S-transferases and thiol concentrations in embryonic and early fetal tissues. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2445–2450. [PubMed]
  • Ramirez D, Lammer EJ, Iovannisci DM, et al. Maternal smoking during early pregnancy, GSTP1 and EPHX1 variants, and risk of isolated orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44:366–373. [PubMed]
  • Robertson IG, Guthenberg C, Mannervik B, Jernstrom B. Differences in stereoselectivity and catalytic efficiency of three human glutathione transferases in the conjugation of glutathione with 7 beta, 8 alpha-dihydroxy-9 alpha, 10 alpha-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene. Cancer Res. 1986;46:2220–2224. [PubMed]
  • Romitti PA, Lidral AC, Munger RG, et al. Candidate genes for nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate and maternal cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption: evaluation of genotype-environment interactions from a population-based case-control study of orofacial clefts. Teratology. 1999;59:39–50. [PubMed]
  • Romitti PA, Sun L, Honein MA, et al. Maternal periconceptional alcohol consumption and risk of orofacial clefts. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:775–785. [PubMed]
  • Rothman K, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. Philadephia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1998.
  • Saad AY, Gartner LP, Hiatt JL. Teratogenic effects of nicotine on palate formation in mice. Biol Struct Morphog. 1990;3:31–35. [PubMed]
  • Saito T, Cui XM, Yamamoto T, et al. Effect of N′-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) on murine palatal fusion in vitro. Toxicology. 2005;207:475–485. [PubMed]
  • Schultz RE, Cooper ME, Daack-Hirsch S, et al. Targeted scan of fifteen regions for nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate in Filipino families. Am J Med Genet. 2004;125A:17–22. [PubMed]
  • Schwartz D, Collins F. Medicine. Environmental biology and human disease. Science. 2007;316:695–696. [PubMed]
  • Seller MJ, Bnait KS. Effects of tobacco smoke inhalation on the developing mouse embryo and fetus. Reprod Toxicol. 1995;9:449–459. [PubMed]
  • Shaw GM, Iovannisci DM, Yang W, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) genetic variants, maternal smoking, vitamin use, and risk of human orofacial clefts. Am J Epidemiol. 2005a;162:1207–1214. [PubMed]
  • Shaw GM, Iovannisci DM, Yang W, et al. Risks of human conotruncal heart defects associated with 32 single nucleotide polymorphisms of selected cardiovascular disease-related genes. Am J Med Genet A. 2005b;138:21–26. [PubMed]
  • Shaw GM, Nelson V, Iovannisci DM, et al. Maternal occupational chemical exposures and biotransformation genotypes as risk factors for selected congenital anomalies. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:475–484. [PubMed]
  • Shaw GM, Wasserman CR, Lammer EJ, et al. Orofacial clefts, parental cigarette smoking, and transforming growth factor-alpha gene variants. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:551–561. [PubMed]
  • Shi M, Christensen K, Weinberg CR, et al. Orofacial cleft risk is increased with maternal smoking and specific detoxification-gene variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:76–90. [PubMed]
  • Sim E, Payton M, Noble M, Minchin R. An update on genetic, structural and functional studies of aryl-amine N-acetyltransferases in eucaryotes and procaryotes. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2435–2441. [PubMed]
  • Smelt VA, Upton A, Adjaye J, et al. Expression of arylamine N-acetyltransferases in pre-term placentas and in human pre-implantation embryos. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:1101–1107. [PubMed]
  • Stoilov I, Jansson I, Sarfarazi M, Schenkman JB. Roles of cytochrome p450 in development. Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2001;18:33–55. [PubMed]
  • Suarez L, Felkner M, Brender JD, et al. Maternal exposures to cigarette smoke, alcohol, and street drugs and neural tube defect occurrence in offspring. Matern Child Health J 2007 [PubMed]
  • Sun D, Vanderburg CR, Odierna GS, Hay ED. TGFbeta3 promotes transformation of chicken palate medial edge epithelium to mesenchyme in vitro. Development. 1998;125:95–105. [PubMed]
  • Suzuki S, Marazita ML, Miwa N, et al. Mutations in BMP4 are associated with subepithelial, microform, and overt cleft Lip. 57th annual meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics; San Diego, CA, USA. 2007.
  • Thomae TL, Glover E, Bradfield CA. A maternal Ahr null genotype sensitizes embryos to chemical teratogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:30189–30194. [PubMed]
  • Thomae TL, Stevens EA, Bradfield CA. Transforming growth factor-beta3 restores fusion in palatal shelves exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetra-chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:12742–12746. [PubMed]
  • Torfs CP, Christianson RE. Maternal risk factors and major associated defects in infants with Down syndrome. Epidemiology. 1999;10:264–270. [PubMed]
  • Torfs CP, Christianson RE, Iovannisci DM, et al. Selected gene polymorphisms and their interaction with maternal smoking, as risk factors for gastroschisis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76:723–730. [PubMed]
  • Torfs CP, Velie EM, Oechsli FW, et al. A population-based study of gastroschisis: demographic, pregnancy, and lifestyle risk factors. Teratology. 1994;50:44–53. [PubMed]
  • Umbach DM, Weinberg CR. Designing and analysing case-control studies to exploit independence of genotype and exposure. Stat Med. 1997;16:1731–1743. [PubMed]
  • Umbach DM, Weinberg CR. The use of case-parent triads to study joint effects of genotype and exposure. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:251–261. [PubMed]
  • van den Boogaard MJ, Dorland M, Beemer FA, van Amstel HK. MSX1 mutation is associated with orofacial clefting and tooth agenesis in humans. Nat Genet. 2000;24:342–343. [PubMed]
  • van Rooij IA, Groenen PM, van Drongelen M, et al. Orofacial clefts and spina bifida: N-acetyltransferase phenotype, maternal smoking, and medication use. Teratology. 2002;66:260–266. [PubMed]
  • van Rooij IA, Wegerif MJ, Roelofs HM, et al. Smoking, genetic polymorphisms in biotransformation enzymes, and nonsyndromic oral clefting: a gene-environment interaction. Epidemiology. 2001;12:502–507. [PubMed]
  • Vieira AR. Association between the transforming growth factor alpha gene and nonsyndromic oral clefts: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:790–810. [PubMed]
  • Vieira AR, Orioli IM, Castilla EE, et al. MSX1 and TGFB3 contribute to clefting in South America. J Dent Res. 2003;82:289–292. [PubMed]
  • Warkany J, Nelson RC, Schraffenberger E. Congenital malformations induced in rats by maternal nutritional deficiency. Am J Dis Child. 1943;65:882–894.
  • Wasserman CR, Shaw GM, O’Malley CD, et al. Parental cigarette smoking and risk for congenital anomalies of the heart, neural tube, or limb. Teratology. 1996;53:261–267. [PubMed]
  • Watson MA, Stewart RK, Smith GB, et al. Human glutathione S-transferase P1 polymorphisms: relationship to lung tissue enzyme activity and population frequency distribution. Carcinogenesis. 1998;19:275–280. [PubMed]
  • Wehby GL, Marcinow A, Quin X, et al. A genetic instrumental variables analysis of the effects of maternal smoking on oral cleft risks. 57th annual meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics; San Diego, CA, USA. 2007.
  • Weinberg CR. Can DAGs clarify effect modification? Epidemiology. 2007;18:569–572. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Werler MM, Lammer EJ, Rosenberg L, Mitchell AA. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy in relation to oral clefts. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:926–932. [PubMed]
  • Werler MM, Mitchell AA, Shapiro S. Demographic, reproductive, medical, and environmental factors in relation to gastroschisis. Teratology. 1992;45:353–360. [PubMed]
  • Whitlock JP., Jr Induction of cytochrome P4501A1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1999;39:103–125. [PubMed]
  • Wyszynski DF, Duffy DL, Beaty TH. Maternal cigarette smoking and oral clefts: a meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:206–210. [PubMed]
  • Wyszynski DF, Wu T. Use of US birth certificate data to estimate the risk of maternal cigarette smoking for oral clefting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39:188–192. [PubMed]
  • Yazdy MM, Honein MA, Rasmussen SA, Frias JL. Priorities for future public health research in orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44:351–357. [PubMed]
  • Yoon P, Rasmussen LMSA, Moore CA, et al. The National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Public Health Reports. 2001;116(Suppl 1):32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zeiger JS, Beaty TH, Hetmanski JB, et al. Genetic and environmental risk factors for sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2002;13:602–606. [PubMed]
  • Zeiger JS, Beaty TH, Liang KY. Oral clefts, maternal smoking, and TGFA: a meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42:58–63. [PubMed]