PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aidMary Ann Liebert, Inc.Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.JournalsSearchAlerts
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
 
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008 September; 24(9): 1209–1213.
PMCID: PMC2562759
NIHMSID: NIHMS49595

Analysis of Nevirapine Resistance Mutations in Cloned HIV Type 1 Variants from HIV-Infected Ugandan Infants Using a Single-Step Amplification-Sequencing Method (AmpliSeq)

Abstract

We analyzed the genetic linkage of nevirapine (NVP) resistance mutations and the genetic complexity of HIV-1 variants in Ugandan infants who were HIV infected despite single dose (SD) prophylaxis. Plasma samples were obtained from six HIV-infected infants who had two or more NVP resistance mutations detected by population sequencing (ViroSeq). ViroSeq PCR products were cloned and transformed, and a single-step amplification-sequencing reaction (AmpliSeq) was used to analyze NVP resistance mutations in cloned HIV-1 variants directly from bacterial colonies. Fifty clones were analyzed for each infant sample. This analysis revealed numerous NVP resistance mutations not detected by population sequencing, genetically linked NVP resistance mutations, and a high degree of genetic complexity at codons that influence NVP susceptibility.

Single dose (SD) nevirapine (NVP) and other NVP-containing regimens are used in resource-limited settings for prevention of HIV-1 mother-to-child transmission. These regimens are effective, but are associated with the emergence and persistence of NVP-resistant HIV-1 variants in some women and in some infants who are HIV infected despite prophylaxis.1 Low-level NVP-resistant HIV-1 variants can persist2 and may affect treatment outcome.3

Several methods can be used to analyze NVP resistance mutations. However, each method has some limitations. HIV-1 genotyping methods based on population (bulk) sequencing are relatively insensitive for the detection of low-level HIV-1 variants with resistance mutations. Point mutation assays, such as allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the LigAmp, and the oligonucleotide ligation (OLA), are more sensitive than routine genotyping assays, but may be labor intensive if multiple mutations are analyzed.4,5 Variations in the HIV-1 nucleotide sequence at oligonucleotide or primer binding sites can interfere with hybridization, ligation, and/or priming in these assays.

In addition to the limitations mentioned, the assays described above do not provide information about the genetic linkage of NVP resistance mutations in individual HIV-1 variants. This information can be obtained by sequencing viral genomes after cloning6 by single genome sequencing (SGS),7 by ultradeep pyrosequencing,8 or by parallel allele-specific sequencing (PASS).9 Of these methods, the first three (traditional cloning/sequencing, SGS, and ultradeep pyrosequencing) provide sequence information. In contrast, PASS provides information for individual codons (point mutations). For each method, the sensitivity of mutation detection depends on the number of HIV-1 templates analyzed. Pyrosequencing and PASS require specialized equipment, but can be used to screen large numbers of templates, enhancing the sensitivity of mutation detection.

In this report, we used a single-step amplification-sequencing reaction (AmpliSeq)10 to analyze the genetic linkage of NVP resistance mutations and genetic complexity at HIV-1 reverse transcriptase codons associated with NVP resistance in six 6-week-old Ugandan infants who were HIV-1 infected despite SD NVP prophylaxis and who had two or more NVP resistance mutations detected by population sequencing (Table 1). The samples were collected in three clinical trials conducted in Kampala, Uganda: (1) the HIVNET 012 trial,11,12 (2) the Repeat Pregnancy Study,13 and (3) the Breast Feeding Study (“Pathobiology of Breast Milk among HIV-1 Infected Ugandan Women Receiving Intrapartum Nevirapine”). HIV-1 genotyping was performed using the ViroSeq HIV Genotyping System (ViroSeq, Celera Diagnostics, Alameda, CA) using 0.1 ml of infant plasma. The HIV-1 subtype of each sample was determined by phylogenetic analysis of pol region sequences.

Table 1.
Samples Used for Analysisa

DNA cloning was accomplished as follows. Using the ViroSeq system, RNA was extracted from plasma, and the HIV-1 RNA was reverse transcribed to generate complementary DNA. Pol region DNA (encoding the 3′ portion of HIV-1 gag, HIV-1 protease, and the 5′ portion of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase) was amplified using Research Use Only PCR mix provided by Celera Diagnosics, which was identical to the PCR mix included in the ViroSeq system, except that dTTP was substituted for dUTP. Amplification was performed without dUTP, because dUTP-containing PCR products cannot be cloned using commercially available competent cells. The PCR products were purified using spin columns, and were incubated with Taq polymerase and dNTPs for the addition of terminal adenosine-phosphate groups, and transformed into TOP 10 electrocompetent Escherichia coli cells (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA). Colonies were isolated on plates containing ampicillin. S-Gal (Sigma Corp., St. Louis, MO) was used to indicate the presence of a DNA insert in the plasmid vector. White colonies were selected for analysis with AmpliSeq.

AmpliSeq uses commercially available DNA sequencing reagents supplemented with additional dNTPs for the combined amplification/sequencing reaction. Two oligonucleotides are added to each reaction, with one in molar excess. During the initial reaction cycles, the low-concentration oligonucleotide and the dNTPs are incorporated into amplification products. In later reaction cycles, DNA sequencing termination products (generated by priming from the high-concentration oligonucleotide and incorporating ddNTPs) predominate. To perform the analysis, a small inoculum (barely visible on a pipette tip) of each bacterial colony was added directly to a 20 μl reaction containing 4 μl Reaction Ready Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 1× Sequencing Buffer (Applied Biosystems), 0.15 mM dNTPs, 0.05 μM forward primer (5′-AGATTTCAGGGAACTCAATAA-AAGAACTCA-3′), and 0.25 μm reverse primer (5′-GGTTCTTTCTGATGCTTTTTGTCTGGTGT-3′). These primers were designed to bind to regions of HIV-1 that are conserved in HIV-1 subtypes A, C, and D. The AmpliSeq reaction was performed using an Applied Biosystems 9700 thermal cycler as follows: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 25 three-step cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, followed by 40 three-step cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 50°C for 15 s, and 60°C 4 min. The reactions were ethanol precipitated, resuspended in 20 μl of HiDi formamide (Applied Biosystems), and analyzed on an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Fifty sequences were analyzed for each infant sample (total 300 sequences).

HIV-1 sequence data generated using the AmpliSeq method were analyzed using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor.14 Sequences included nucleotides encoding HIV-1 reverse transcriptase amino acids 95–195. Sequences were examined for the following mutations: A98G, L100I, K101E/P, K103N/S/Q/T, K103R+V179D, V106A/M, V108I, E138K, V179D/E/F, Y181C/I/V, Y188C/H/L, and G190A/E/S/Q. Mutations shown in bold are associated with reduced NVP susceptibility; mutations in bold and italic are associated with high-level phenotypic NVP resistance and/or reduced virologic response to a clinical regimen.15 DNAStar MegAlign (DNAStar, Inc., Madison, WI) was used to generate sequence alignments. Phylogenetic trees based on 500 bootstraps were generated using DNAStar MegAlign (DNAStar, Inc., Madison, WI). The 50 clonal HIV-1 sequences from each infant grouped together with the corresponding maternal sequence, as expected (not shown).

We first analyzed the amino acid sequences from the 50 clones isolated from each infant sample for NVP resistance mutations (Table 2). For each infant, NVP resistance mutations that were identified in the population sequence were also identified in one or more of the 50 clonal sequences. Clones from five of the six infants also had NVP resistance mutations that were not identified by population sequencing. Clones with two genetically linked NVP resistance mutations were identified in five of the six infants (Table 2).

Table 2.
NVP Resistance Mutations Detected in Clonesa

We next analyzed the nucleotide sequences of the 50 clones from each infant to determine which codons were present at positions of NVP resistance mutations (Table 3). Up to six different amino acids were detected at a single position (e.g., at codon 179). Furthermore, at 5 of the 10 positions analyzed, we detected two different codons encoding the same amino acid (e.g., GCA and GCG for Ala at codon 98). In one infant, all 50 clones had K103R, and 24 of those clones had V179D; these two mutations are associated with NVP resistance only when they occur together.15,16 Excluding K103R and V179D in that infant, the portion of clones that had NVP resistance mutations varied from one position to another (from 0 to 140 clones out of 300 clones examined).

Table 3.
Codons Detected in Clones at Positions in HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Associated with NVP Resistancea

The methods described in this report can be performed using DNA remaining from HIV-1 genotyping, which is ideal for analysis of samples that are limited in volume, such as those from pediatric studies. We were able to obtain read lengths of approximately 300 bases with a single AmpliSeq reaction, enabling us to analyze the two major regions where NVP resistance mutations occur (i.e., at codons 98–108 and codons 179–190). AmpliSeq has been optimized for read lengths of approximately 500 bases using purified human and bacterial genomic templates.10 The methods described in this report also produce cloned plasmids, which can be used for further characterization of specific HIV-1 variants.

The samples used in this study were selected from six infants who had two or more NVP resistance mutations detected by population sequencing. Clonal analysis revealed that five of the six infants had some HIV-1 variants with two or more genetically linked mutations. HIV-1 variants with multiple NVP resistance mutations may have altered fitness, different patterns of cross-resistance to other nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors compared to HIV-1 variants with single NVP resistance mutations.15 With the exception of one infant who had the K103R polymorphism in all clones and V179D in a high portion of clones, HIV-1 variants with two genetically linked mutations represented a small portion of the viral population (one to four clones out of 50 analyzed in each infant). In three of the five infants with genetically linked mutations, each of the individual mutations was also detected separately in some clones. Because AmpliSeq amplifies a mixed population of HIV variants, there is some possibility that recombination occurred during the amplification reaction. This potential problem can be avoided using methods such as SGS, PASS, or pyrosequencing.

Analysis of HIV-1 clones from these infants also revealed a high degree of genetic complexity at codons that influence NVP susceptibility. Among the clones from six infants, we detected at least four different codons at 5 of the 10 positions analyzed, and 5 of the 10 positions analyzed had two different codons that encoded the same amino acid. This high degree of diversity, which was also seen at codons in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase that are not associated with NVP resistance, underscores the challenges faced in designing oligonucleotide reagents for point mutation assays and other assays that rely on hybridization of olignonucleotides to HIV-1 DNA.

Sequence Data

The GenBank accession numbers for the population sequences from the six infants in the study are EU715589–EU71594.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the mothers and infants who participated in the HIVNET 012 trial, the RP study, and the Breast Feeding study. The authors also thank the study teams for providing the samples used in this study, and thank the laboratory staff at Makerere University and Johns Hopkins University for assistance with sample shipment and processing. This study was supported by (1) the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), and Office of AIDS Research, of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS). NIH, DHHS (U01-AI-068613), (2) the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network of the NIAID (U01-AI-068632), (3) the HIV Network for Prevention Trials (HIVNET) and sponsored by NIAID, NIH, DHHS, through contract U01-AI-046749 with Family Health International, contract U01-AI-046745 with Johns Hopkins University, and (4) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, including contract number 200-2004-M-09279 to Johns Hopkins University. None of the authors has a commercial or other association that might pose a conflict of interest with the following exception: Dr. James Eshleman (spouse of Susan H. Eshleman) is a co-inventor of the AmpliSeq assay and Johns Hopkins University has filed a patent application with the US-Patent and Trademark Office. The inventors may receive royalty payments if the application is awarded and licensed.

References

1. McConnell MS. Stringer JS. Kourtis AP. Weidle PJ. Eshleman SH. Use of single-dose nevirapine for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: Does development of resistance matter? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:S56–63. [PubMed]
2. Flys TS. Donnell D. Mwatha A, et al. Persistence of K103N-containing HIV-1 variants after single-dose nevirapine for prevention of HIV-1 mother-to-child transmission. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:711–715. [PubMed]
3. Johnson J. Li JF. Wei X, et al. Low-frequency mutations substantially increase the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance, greatly strengthen the relationship between resistance mutations, virologic failure. 14th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; Los Angeles, CA. Feb 25–28;2007 ; Abstract #639.
4. Ellis GM. Mahalanabis M. Beck IA, et al. Comparison of oligonucleotide ligation assay and consensus sequencing for detection of drug-resistant mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and plasma. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3670–3674. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Palmer S. Boltz V. Martinson N, et al. Persistence of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 in women after single-dose nevirapine therapy for prevention of maternal-to-fetal HIV-1 transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:7094–7099. [PubMed]
6. Eshleman SH. Jones D. Flys T. Petrauskene O. Jackson JB. Analysis of HIV-1 variants by cloning DNA generated with the ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System. Biotechniques. 2003;35:614–618. 620, 622. [PubMed]
7. Palmer S. Kearney M. Maldarelli F, et al. Multiple, linked human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance mutations in treatment-experienced patients are missed by standard genotype analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:406–413. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Hoffmann C. Minkah N. Leipzig J, et al. DNA bar coding and pyrosequencing to identify rare HIV drug resistance mutations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:e91. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Cai F. Chen H. Hicks CB. Bartlett JA. Zhu J. Gao F. Detection of minor drug-resistant populations by parallel allele-specific sequencing. Nat Methods. 2007;4:123–125. [PubMed]
10. Murphy KM. Berg KD. Eshleman JR. Sequencing of genomic DNA by combined amplification and cycle sequencing reaction. Clin Chem. 2005;51:35–39. [PubMed]
11. Guay LA. Musoke P. Fleming T, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:795–802. [PubMed]
12. Jackson JB. Musoke P. Fleming T, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: 18 months follow-up of the HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet. 2003;362:859–868. [PubMed]
13. McConnell MS. Bakaki P. Eure C, et al. Effectiveness of repeat single-dose nevirapine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in repeat pregnancies, Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:291–296. [PubMed]
14. Hall TA. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–98.
15. Stanford University: Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database. http://hivdb.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/NNR-TIResiNote.cgi. [Apr 08;]. http://hivdb.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/NNR-TIResiNote.cgi
16. Parkin NT. Gupta S. Chappey C. Petropoulos CJ. The K101P and K103R/V179D mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase confer resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:351–354. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.