Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 October 7.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2562549

Matrix Gla Protein Is Associated With Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis but not With Coronary Artery Calcification



Atherosclerotic coronary artery calcification (CAC) is associated with increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Matrix Gla protein (MGP) is an inhibitor of calcification in vivo. However, little is known regarding the distribution of circulating MGP and its associations with CHD risk factors or with CAC in humans.

Methods and Results

Serum MGP concentrations were determined in 2 independent populations of men and women free of clinically apparent cardiovascular disease: study A, n=316, mean age 58 years, and study B, n=452, mean age 68 years. CAC was determined by computed tomography. Mean MGP concentrations were 98.4 and 198 ng/mL in men, and 97.4 and 201 ng/mL in women, in study A and study B, respectively. In both cohorts, MGP levels were higher with increasing age. In age-adjusted analyses, there was an association of circulating MGP with increasing Framingham CHD risk score (in study A, P=0.003 in men and P=0.016 in women, respectively; in study B, a nonsignificant increase in men and P=0.05 in women, respectively). Significant associations of circulating MGP with high-density lipoprotein and other individual CHD risk factors were also noted in both cohorts. There were no consistent associations between MGP and CAC after adjustment for CHD risk score in the 2 cohorts.


MGP is associated with individual CHD risk factors and the Framingham CHD risk score in men and women free of clinically apparent CHD. The relation of MGP with CAC deserves further study in larger populations.

Keywords: atherosclerosis, coronary artery calcification, coronary risk factors, matrix Gla protein

Epicardial coronary artery calcification (CAC) occurs in atherosclerosis1 and is associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD).2 It has been hypothesized that vascular calcification occurs via metabolic processes similar to those involved in bone deposition.3,4 However, human data are sparse to support or refute this hypothesis. As with other processes implicated in atherogenesis, such as lipid metabolism and inflammation, serum markers may provide clues to the underlying pathogenesis of CAC. In atherosclerosis, intimal macrophages and vascular smooth muscle cells express multiple proteins in association with calcification, including the vitamin K-dependent protein, Matrix Gla protein (MGP).5-7

Genetic and biochemical studies have established MGP as the first protein known to act as a calcification inhibitor in vivo. In mice, targeted deletion of the MGP gene causes rapid calcification of the elastic lamellae of the arterial media that begins at birth.8 In the rat, treatment with the vitamin K antagonist, warfarin, at doses that inhibit the vitamin K-dependent γ-carboxylation of MGP, causes rapid calcification of elastic lamellae of arterial media and increased gene expression of MGP in the calcifying artery.9 Observational studies in small, selected cohorts of human subjects suggest that use of oral anticoagulants is associated with increasing valve calcification and CAC.10,11 These animal and human data support the hypothesis that MGP is an important regulator of vascular calcification.

The evidence for an association between serum MGP and vascular calcification is less consistent. There is a strong positive correlation between serum MGP concentrations and artery calcification in the rat, with 3-fold elevation in serum MGP in those animals with the greatest artery calcification,9 presumably secondary to increased local synthesis of MGP for the purpose of slowing the progression of artery calcification. However, increased serum levels of MGP, without a concomitant increase in MGP expression in the arterial walls, does not inhibit the ectopic mineralization observed in mice lacking MGP.12 The available data in humans are conflicting, with serum MGP levels reported to be elevated in one study13 and decreased in another study14 of selected patients with severe atherosclerosis. It is possible that confounding factors may underlie these differing findings. However, the interrelationships between MGP and established atherosclerosis risk factors are unknown, and it is uncertain whether risk factors individually or together may confound the relationship between MGP and coronary atherosclerosis.

In the current study, we examined associations of serum concentrations of MGP with both coronary risk factors and CAC by computed tomography in 2 independent cohorts of men and women free of clinically apparent CHD: a community-based sample of middle-aged men and women (the Framingham Heart Study) and a sample of healthy elderly men and women participating in a vitamin K supplementation clinical trial.


Study Cohorts and Determination of Risk Factors

In the study A design, subjects were drawn from a stratified sample of participants from the Framingham Offspring Study enrolled in a pilot study of electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The Offspring cohort was initially recruited in 1971 and consisted of 5124 men and women age 5 to 70 years.15 Of the 3219 participants attending the sixth examination cycle (1995 to 1998), we excluded from sampling 349 who had clinically apparent cardiovascular disease, 357 who lived outside New England, and 7 who were not between ages 35 and 84 years. The remaining 2506 subjects were stratified by sex, quartiles of age, and quintiles of Framingham CHD risk score. Those with Framingham CHD risk scores in the first and second quintiles were classified as low-risk, those in the third and fourth quintiles as medium-risk, and those in the highest quintile as high-risk. Subjects were sampled randomly and equally from each stratum, and invited to undergo EBCT, as previously described.16 Thirteen percent of eligible individuals contacted declined to participate; refusals were handled by randomly selecting another person from the same stratum.

The methods for anthropomorphic measurements, physician history, physical examination, and blood assays for cardiovascular risk factor information have been described.17 Data from the sixth examination cycle (1995 to 1998) were used for analyses of contemporary risk factors with CAC. The Framingham CHD risk score was calculated as previously described.18

Study B was comprised 452 men and postmenopausal women (mean age, 68 years; 267 women) participating in a randomized controlled trial of the impact of vitamin K supplementation on bone mineral density and CAC. Exclusion criteria included a usual vitamin K dietary intake >90 μg/d; a usual dietary calcium intake >1500 mg/d; a usual dietary vitamin D intake >1500 IU/d; women <5 years postmenopausal; femoral neck bone mineral density at screening >1.8 standard deviations above or below an age-matched reference mean; a 24-hour urine calcium to creatinine ratio >300 mg/g for women or 350 mg/g for men; a terminal illness; renal or liver disease; a kidney stone in the past 5 years; current hyperparathyroidism; current oral anticoagulant use; current treatment with an osteoporosis treatment medication or estrogen replacement; known CHD; previous open heart surgery; and atrial fibrillation. All data presented here for study B were collected at the baseline visit, before randomization.

At the time of the baseline visit, information regarding medication use, medical history and smoking status were collected. Criteria used to define the presence of diabetes were the same as those for study A.17 Height and weight were measured while the subjects stood.

Body mass index was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters. Blood pressure was measured in the right arm after the individual had been seated for at least 5 minutes. Current smokers were defined as subjects who reported smoking cigarettes on a regular basis during the previous year. Lipid concentrations were measured enzymatically, as described for study A.

Determination of Serum MGP

Blood samples from both studies were collected after fasting (>10 hours); serum samples were stored at −70°C for ≤2 years, and shipped on dry ice to University of California at San Diego for MGP analysis. Serum MGP was analyzed on first thaw using a radioimmunoassay.16 Because of the multiple post-translational modifications in the 79-aa residue MGP (5 residues of γ-carboxyglutamate and 3 of phosphoserine),19,20 the assay used MGP purified directly from human bone for assay standards and for preparation of the polyclonal antibody to MGP in rabbits.

Scanning and Analysis for CAC

Study A

EBCT scans were performed between 1998 and 1999 using an Imatron C-150 XP scanner in accordance with previously published protocols.16 Each scan was assessed by a technologist and over-read by a single experienced radiologist (M.E.C.), blinded to clinical data. A CAC score was generated using the method described by Agatston.21 Reproducibility was assessed by having 20 scans reread in a blinded fashion (r=0.97 for replicate readings). Image noise in each scan was assessed by determining the SD of pixel numbers in a region of interest within the aorta, as previously described.16

Study B

Scanning was performed using an 8-slice multidetector computed tomography scanner (Lightspeed Ultra; General Electric, Milwaukee, Wis) with prospective electrocardiographic gating during a single breath hold (12 seconds) using sequential data acquisition, as previously described.22 Each scan was assessed by a technologist and over-read by a single experienced radiologist (M.F. and U.H.). A CAC score was generated using a modification of the method described by Agatston.21

In study A, each participant provided additional written informed consent to undergo EBCT imaging, in addition to providing written informed consent before participation in each Framingham examination cycle. The imaging protocol was approved by the Boston University Human Studies committee and the Committee for Clinical Investigation of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. In study B, each participant provided written informed consent as approved by the Tufts-New England Medical Center and Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Boards. The analysis of MGP in serum was approved by the University of California at San Diego Institutional Review Board.

Statistical Analyses

For both studies, we computed Pearson correlations for sex-specific relations of MGP levels with age, risk factors, and Framingham CHD risk score. We tested for the presence of significant associations between quartiles of MGP and the various risk factors using univariate analysis of variance and multiple linear regression. To adjust for the stratified sampling scheme, all analyses for CHD risk factors in study A were performed using analysis of variance (using the SURVEYREG and SURVEYMEANS procedures) in version 8.2 of SAS. For study B, all analyses for CHD risk factors were performed using analysis of variance (the general linear model procedure) in version 12.0 of SPSS. Tobit analysis was used in both studies to examine associations between MGP and CAC using SAS v8.2. Tobit analysis is recommended for the analysis of CAC because it minimizes the impact of extreme CAC scores on overall findings.23 We conducted sex-specific analyses adjusted for age and then in addition for Framingham CHD risk score. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered significant. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered significant.


Study A

EBCT testing was performed on 327 participants, 316 of whom had MGP measurements (49% of whom were women). The mean±SD (range) ages were 57±9 (35 to 76) and 58±9 (35 to 77) years for men and women, respectively. Fasting MGP serum concentrations were significantly higher with increasing age in both men (P=0.003) and women (P=0.02), but did not differ between men and women in this population. The overall mean±SD (range) CHD risk scores were 17.3±12.1 (2 to 53) and 8.8±6.7 (1 to 27) for men and women, respectively. Baseline CHD risk factors in men and women are shown according to MGP quartiles in Table 1. In age-adjusted linear regression analyses for men, there was a statistically significant association of circulating levels of MGP with higher CHD risk score and lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (Table 1). There was no significant association of MGP with total or total:HDL cholesterol ratio. Among women, there were significant associations of circulating levels of MGP with higher CHD risk score as well as increasing triglycerides, total cholesterol and total:HDL cholesterol, and there was an inverse association with HDL cholesterol and use of estrogen replacement therapy (Table 1).

Coronary Disease Risk Factors* by Quartiles of Serum Matrix Gla Protein (MGP), Study A

Using Tobit analysis, there was no significant association between MGP and CAC in age-adjusted analyses for women (P=0.15) or men (P=0.52) or after further adjustment for CHD risk score in either women or men.

Study B

Computed tomography (CT) testing was performed on 452 participants, 451 of whom had MGP measurements. The mean±SD (range) ages were 69±6 (60 to 81) and 68±5 (60 to 81) years for men and women, respectively. Fasting MGP serum concentrations were higher with increasing age in both men (P=0.005) and women (P<0.001), but did not differ between men and women. The mean±SD (range) CHD risk scores were 15.6±8.7 (2 to 40) and 9.6±6.0 (2 to 32) for men and women, respectively. Baseline CHD risk factors are shown according to MGP quartiles in Table 2. In age-adjusted linear regression analyses for men, there was a statistically significant association of circulating MGP with higher body mass index, triglycerides, total:HDL cholesterol and current cigarette smoking (Table 2). Among women, there was a significant association of circulating MGP with increasing body mass index, systolic blood pressure, total:HDL cholesterol, cigarette smoking, and an inverse association with HDL cholesterol. For men, there was a nonsignificant association of MGP with higher CHD risk score and for women there was a borderline significant association (P=0.05).

Coronary Disease Risk Factors* by Quartiles of Serum Matrix Gla Protein (MGP), Study B

Using Tobit analysis, there was a modest positive association between MGP and CAC in age-adjusted analyses for women (P=0.03) but not men (0.79), and this association remained significant after further adjustment for CHD risk score in women (P=0.04) but not in men (P=0.79).


In these 2 study cohorts free of clinically apparent cardiovascular disease, we describe the distribution of circulating MGP concentrations and we report that MGP concentrations are associated with higher levels of a number of coronary risk factors, as well as the overall Framingham CHD risk score. In study A, subjects were drawn from a well-characterized, community-based cohort free of cardiovascular disease and sampled to represent a broad spectrum of ages and cardiovascular risk. In study B, subjects were older men and women selected for their low usual dietary vitamin K intake (<90 μg/d) to participate in a vitamin K supplementation study, and were also free of cardiovascular disease. To our knowledge, there are no other reports of associations between circulating concentrations of MGP and coronary risk factors in men and women free of clinically apparent CHD.

The findings of associations of MGP concentrations with HDL cholesterol and total:HDL cholesterol, and with Framingham CHD risk score in 2 independent studies provides consistent evidence that traditional lipid risk factors are significantly associated with circulating MGP. In further analyses, there is no significant difference in high total cholesterol (> 240 mg/dL) or prevalence of total cholesterol-lowering drug treatment across MGP quartiles in either men or women (analyses not shown), suggesting that the predominant lipid association is with HDL cholesterol.

Increasing concentrations of MGP were modestly associated with higher levels of coronary calcium deposition after adjustment for CHD risk score in women but not men in the more elderly cohort study B. Our study sample sizes are relatively small, and estimates of association may be more reliable in larger sample sizes. Further research is justified in larger prospective cohorts to confirm associations with specific vascular risk factors and to assess the magnitude of association, independence from other risk factors, and sex-specificity of the positive relationship of MGP with vascular calcium deposits.

Increased concentrations of circulating MGP have been associated with arterial calcification in the rat9 and in patients with severe atherosclerosis.13 MGP is found at high levels in the vicinity of calcium deposits in mice and humans.24 In humans, polymorphisms in the MGP gene have been associated with MGP promoter activity and circulating serum concentrations of MGP,25 and evidence from one study suggests that variants in the MGP gene may be linked to CHD and CAC,26 although in another study the associations with CAC are weak and not statistically significant.27 Taken together, these findings suggest that arterial calcification may lead to increased MGP expression, perhaps in a feedback attempt to physiologically reduce bone-like formation of calcium deposits in the artery. Conversely, a more recent, small study attributed an inverse association between circulating MGP concentrations and coronary calcification to poor overall vitamin K status.14 These conclusions were not consistent with our observations in either cohort. Of note, both study A and study B were conducted in subjects free of CHD, likely at substantially lower risk than subjects in the previous study. It will be of interest to examine the role of randomization to vitamin K supplementation to progression of CAC and to change in MGP levels in study B, which is ongoing. Finally, increased serum levels of MGP, without concomitant increased MGP expression in the arterial walls does not inhibit the abnormal mineralization observed in mice lacking MGP.12 Our finding of an inconsistent association of MGP with CAC in women, and no consistent association in men suggests that serum MGP concentrations are not robust in their predictive value of CAC, and that confounding by risk factors may explain much of the association.

Several limitations of these studies deserve consideration. MGP and risk factors were measured at the same time, but there was a time interval of ≈2 years between MGP measurement and EBCT testing in Study A. This might have led to an underestimation of the true magnitude of association between MGP and CAC score. However, the findings of study A are consistent with study B, in which MGP concentrations were determined at the same time as the CT scan. Image noise is correlated with body mass index in CT scans (r=0.8 in study A) and may confound coronary calcium readings in obese individuals. We found that body mass index and image noise are highly correlated, and in study A, we conducted further analyses of associations between MGP and body mass index and found no significant association between MGP and body mass index (P=0.14). Subsequent analyses of the association of MGP and CAC, adjusting for body mass index, did not show any marked confounding of the association. Both studies were conducted in primarily white populations, so the findings may not be generalizable to non-white populations.

In our community-based cohorts, MGP levels are higher with increasing age and are associated with higher levels of individual coronary risk factors in middle aged and older men and women. Larger prospective cohorts need to be studied to confirm the strength of an independent positive relationship of MGP with vascular calcium deposits in women.


Sources of Funding

This work was supported by National Institute of Aging (AG14759, AG19147) and by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (HL58090, HL69272), including the Framingham Heart Study (N01-HC-38038).





1. Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation. 1995;92:2157–2162. [PubMed]
2. Pletcher MJ, Tice JA, Pignone M, Browner WS. Using the coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary heart disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1285–1292. [PubMed]
3. Demer LL. Vascular calcification and osteoporosis: inflammatory responses to oxidized lipids. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:737–741. [PubMed]
4. Demer LL, Tintut Y. Mineral exploration: search for the mechanism of vascular calcification and beyond: the 2003 Jeffrey M. Hoeg award lecture. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:1739–1743. [PubMed]
5. Proudfoot D, Skepper JN, Shanahan CM, Weissberg PL. Calcification of human vascular cells in vitro is correlated with high levels of matrix Gla protein and low levels of osteopontin expression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:379–388. [PubMed]
6. Shanahan CM, Cary NR, Metcalfe JC, Weissberg PL. High expression of genes for calcification-regulating proteins in human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2393–2402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Shanahan CM, Cary NR, Salisbury JR, Proudfoot D, Weissberg PL, Edmonds ME. Medial localization of mineralization-regulating proteins in association with Monckeberg's sclerosis: evidence for smooth muscle cell-mediated vascular calcification. Circulation. 1999;100:2168–2176. [PubMed]
8. Luo G, Ducy P, McKee MD, Pinero GJ, Loyer E, Behringer RR, Karsenty G. Spontaneous calcification of arteries and cartilage in mice lacking matrix GLA protein. Nature. 1997;386:78–81. [PubMed]
9. Price PA, Faus SA, Williamson MK. Warfarin causes rapid calcification of the elastic lamellae in rat arteries and heart valves. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1400–1407. [PubMed]
10. Koos R, Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Brandenburg V, Pflueger B, Wildberger JE, Kuhl HP. Relation of oral anticoagulation to cardiac valvular and coronary calcium assessed by multislice spiral computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:747–749. [PubMed]
11. Schurgers LJ, Aebert H, Vermeer C, Bultmann B, Janzen J. Oral anticoagulant treatment: friend or foe in cardiovascular disease? Blood. 2004;104:3231–3232. [PubMed]
12. Murshed M, Schinke T, McKee MD, Karsenty G. Extracellular matrix mineralization is regulated locally; different roles of two gla-containing proteins. J Cell Biol. 2004;165:625–630. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Braam LA, Dissel P, Gijsbers BL, Spronk HM, Hamulyak K, Soute BA, Debie W, Vermeer C. Assay for human matrix gla protein in serum: potential applications in the cardiovascular field. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1257–1261. [PubMed]
14. Jono S, Ikari Y, Vermeer C, Dissel P, Hasegawa K, Shioi A, Taniwaki H, Kizu A, Nishizawa Y, Saito S. Matrix Gla protein is associated with coronary artery calcification as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91:790–794. [PubMed]
15. Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB, Kiely D. Survival Following Cardiovascular Events: 30-Year Follow-up. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; Bethesda, MD: 1988. The Framingham Heart Study, Section 35. An Epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular Disease.
16. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Kupka MJ, Manning WJ, Clouse ME, D'Agostino RB, Wilson PW, O'Donnell CJ. C-reactive protein is associated with subclinical epicardial coronary calcification in men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002;106:1189–1191. [PubMed]
17. Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;110:281–290. [PubMed]
18. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–1847. [PubMed]
19. Price PA, Williamson MK. Primary structure of bovine matrix Gla protein, a new vitamin K-dependent bone protein. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:14971–14975. [PubMed]
20. Price PA, Rice JS, Williamson MK. Conserved phosphorylation of serines in the Ser-X-Glu/Ser(P) sequences of the vitamin K-dependent matrix Gla protein from shark, lamb, rat, cow, and human. Protein Sci. 1994;3:822–830. [PubMed]
21. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–832. [PubMed]
22. Ferencik M, Ferullo A, Achenbach S, Abbara S, Chan RC, Booth SL, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U. Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:559–566. [PubMed]
23. Reilly MP, Wolfe ML, Localio AR, Rader DJ. Coronary artery calcification and cardiovascular risk factors: impact of analytic approach. Atherosclerosis. 2004;173:69–78. [PubMed]
24. Spronk HM, Soute BA, Schurgers LJ, Cleutjens JP, Thijssen HH, De Mey JG, Vermeer C. Matrix Gla protein accumulates at the border of regions of calcification and normal tissue in the media of the arterial vessel wall. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;289:485–490. [PubMed]
25. Farzaneh-Far A, Davies JD, Braam LA, Spronk HM, Proudfoot D, Chan SW, O'Shaughnessy KM, Weissberg PL, Vermeer C, Shanahan CM. A polymorphism of the human matrix gamma-carboxyglutamic acid protein promoter alters binding of an activating protein-1 complex and is associated with altered transcription and serum levels. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:32466–32473. [PubMed]
26. Herrmann SM, Whatling C, Brand E, Nicaud V, Gariepy J, Simon A, Evans A, Ruidavets JB, Arveiler D, Luc G, Tiret L, Henney A, Cambien F. Polymorphisms of the human matrix gla protein (MGP) gene, vascular calcification, and myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:2386–2393. [PubMed]
27. Taylor BC, Schreiner PJ, Doherty TM, et al. Matrix Gla protein and osteopontin genetic associations with coronary artery calcification and bone density: the CARDIA study. Hum Genet. 2005;116:525–528. [PubMed]