PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
N Engl J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC Sep 29, 2008.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2556374
NIHMSID: NIHMS66261
Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Stable Coronary Artery Disease
The PEACE Trial Investigators*
The writing committee for the Prevention of Events with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) Trial (Eugene Braunwald, M.D., Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Michael J. Domanski, M.D., National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md.; Sarah E. Fowler, Ph.D., George Washington University, Rockville, Md.; Nancy L. Geller, Ph.D., National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Bernard J. Gersh, M. D., Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, Minn.; Judith Hsia, M.D., George Washington University, Washington, D.C.; Marc A. Pfeffer, M.D., Ph.D., Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Madeline M. Rice, Ph.D., George Washington University, Rockville, Md.; Yves D. Rosenberg, M.D., National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and Jean L. Rouleau, M.D., University of Montreal, Montreal) takes responsibility for the content of this article. Address reprint requests to Dr. Braunwald at the TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 350 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.
The investigators and research coordinators who participated in the PEACE Trial are listed in the Appendix.
BACKGROUND
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are effective in reducing the risk of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or heart failure. ACE inhibitors have also been shown to reduce atherosclerotic complications in patients who have vascular disease without heart failure.
METHODS
In the Prevention of Events with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) Trial, we tested the hypothesis that patients with stable coronary artery disease and normal or slightly reduced left ventricular function derive therapeutic benefit from the addition of ACE inhibitors to modern conventional therapy. The trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which 8290 patients were randomly assigned to receive either trandolapril at a target dose of 4 mg per day (4158 patients) or matching placebo (4132 patients).
RESULTS
The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 64±8 years, the mean blood pressure 133±17/78±10 mm Hg, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction 58±9 percent. The patients received intensive treatment, with 72 percent having previously undergone coronary revascularization and 70 percent receiving lipid-lowering drugs. The incidence of the primary end point — death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization — was 21.9 percent in the trandolapril group, as compared with 22.5 percent in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the trandolapril group, 0.96; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.06; P=0.43) over a median follow-up period of 4.8 years.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with stable coronary heart disease and preserved left ventricular function who are receiving “current standard” therapy and in whom the rate of cardiovascular events is lower than in previous trials of ACE inhibitors in patients with vascular disease, there is no evidence that the addition of an ACE inhibitor provides further benefit in terms of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization.
Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system has been shown to prolong survival and reduce adverse outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure13 or left ventricular systolic dysfunction.49Indeed, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have become a cornerstone in the treatment of these patients.1012In addition, post hoc analyses of patients from the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD)13 and the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trials,5, 14 both randomized studies that involved patients with moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction, showed a reduction in the rate of acute myocardial infarction in patients who were treated with an ACE inhibitor. These observations raised the possibility that patients with coronary artery disease might benefit from ACE-inhibitor treatment, independently of their left ventricular function.
More recent studies have suggested that patients at high risk for coronary events indeed benefit from ACE-inhibitor therapy. In the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE)15 and the European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease (EUROPA),16 patients with coronary or other vascular disease or with diabetes and another cardiovascular risk factor had reduced rates of death from cardiovascular causes or acute myocardial infarction when assigned to an ACE inhibitor as compared with placebo. Although both of these trials enrolled patients without a history of heart failure, many of the enrollees, especially those in the HOPE study, had an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events.
The goal of the Prevention of Events with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) Trial was to test whether ACE-inhibitor therapy, when added to modern conventional therapy, would reduce the rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction, death from cardiovascular causes, or revascularization in low-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease and normal or slightly reduced left ventricular function.
The design of the PEACE Trial has been described previously17 and is summarized here. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1. This study was designed by Drs. Pfeffer, Braunwald, Domanski, Geller, and Verter. The data were held and analyzed by the clinical and statistical coordinating center under the supervision of Dr. Fowler. The manuscript was written by Dr. Braunwald, Dr. Pfeffer, and the other members of the writing committee. Drs. Fowler, Pfeffer, and Braunwald take responsibility for the data presented.
Table 1
Table 1
Eligibility Criteria.*
CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL
Patients underwent randomization from November 1996 to June 2000 and were followed up for as long as 7 years (median, 4.8 years), until December 31, 2003. The study was conducted after approval from the institutional review boards at 187 sites (listed in the Appendix) in the United States (including Puerto Rico), Canada, and Italy. Patients gave their written informed consent to participate. An independent data and safety monitoring board reviewed patient safety data and interim results. A morbidity and mortality review committee reviewed and classified all outcomes.
In February 2002, given the increasing evidence of the benefit of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers in patients with diabetes mellitus and renal disease,1820 the steering committee, without knowledge of the outcome data and with approval from the data and safety monitoring board, advised the investigators to substitute open-label ACE inhibitors for the masked study treatment in patients with diabetes and either overt proteinuria or hypertension and microalbuminuria.
END POINTS
Fourteen thousand one hundred patients were required to test the hypothesis that an ACE inhibitor would reduce the rate of the original primary end point, which consisted of death from cardiovascular causes or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The secondary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. In October 1997, after 1584 patients had undergone randomization, the steering committee (without any knowledge of outcome data from the trial) concluded that recruiting 14,100 patients was not feasible and expanded the primary end point to include coronary revascularization. The sample size was reduced to 8100 patients, and the original primary end point became a secondary end point.
The study prespecified five other end points based on combinations of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, unstable angina, new congestive heart failure, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and cardiac arrhythmia. In post hoc analyses, the primary end points of the HOPE15 and EUROPA16 studies, as well as new-onset congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization or causing death and new-onset diabetes, were also examined.
RECRUITMENT AND RANDOMIZATION
Potentially eligible subjects participated in a two-week run-in phase during which they were requested to take trandolapril (Mavik, Abbott Laboratories)at a dose of 2 mg per day. They were then excluded if their compliance was poor or if they had side effects or an abnormal rise in the serum concentration of creatinine or potassium. Consenting patients who successfully completed the run-in phase were randomly assigned to receive either trandolapril or a matching placebo; randomization was performed with the use of permuted blocks, stratified according to clinical site.
At a visit six months after randomization, patients who had tolerated the dose of 2 mg per day received a new six-month supply of study medication (trandolapril at a dose of 4 mg per day or matching placebo). Patients continued to be evaluated at six-month intervals for primary and secondary end points and for compliance with their assigned drug regimen. The patients, investigators, and staff members remained blinded to the treatment assignments.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
With the revised sample size, the trial had 90 percent power to detect an 18 percent relative reduction in the incidence of the primary end point, assuming a 19 percent cumulative incidence of the revised primary end point in the placebo group, when the log-rank test was used at a 0.05 level of significance. The sample-size calculation, based on the method of Shih,21 assumed a 15 percent rate of discontinuation of active treatment and a 15 percent rate of crossover to active treatment.
The data and safety monitoring board reviewed data related to safety and the primary end point with use of the Lan-DeMets procedure22 and an O'Brien-Fleming spending function to control the type I error23 and recommended continuation of the trial until its scheduled conclusion. Statistical analyses of the primary and secondary end points followed the intention-to-treat principle. Relative risks, heterogeneity among strata, and interactions between treatment assignment and covariates were assessed by proportional-hazards regression.24All reported P values are two-sided.
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PATIENTS
Of the 8290 patients who underwent randomization, 4158 were assigned to receive trandolapril and 4132 matching placebo. All but one patient in each group began taking the assigned study medication. Eleven patients (three in the trandolapril group and eight in the placebo group) received study medication but did not return for a follow-up visit. The median follow-up period was 4.8 years in each group.
Most baseline characteristics were similar in the two treatment groups (Table 2). Overall, the patients' mean (±SD) age was 64±8 years and 18 percent were women. Fifty-five percent had had a myocardial infarction, 72 percent had undergone at least one coronary-revascularization procedure, and 17 percent were known to have diabetes. A quantitative ejection fraction was available for 95 percent of the cohort, and the mean value was 58±9 percent; for the others, a two-dimensional echocardiogram was reported as showing normal left ventricular function on qualitative assessment. Seventy percent of patients were using lipid-lowering drugs. The average serum cholesterol concentration was 192 mg per deciliter (5 mmol per liter).
Table 2
Table 2
Baseline Characteristics of the Patients.*
FOLLOW-UP
All patients were followed until the trial closeout period (July 1, 2003, to December 31, 2003), until death, or until they became lost to follow-up. Patients were considered lost to follow-up if they had not been seen at a visit within one year before the end of the study. One hundred thirty-four patients (68 in the placebo group [1.6 percent] and 66 in the trandolapril group [1.6 percent]) were lost to follow-up. Overall, vital status was known for all but 45 (0.5 percent) of the patients who underwent randomization.
COMPLIANCE
Among the patients who were randomly assigned to the trandolapril group, 81.9 percent were taking trandolapril or an open-label ACE inhibitor at one year, 78.5 percent were doing so at two years, and 74.5 percent were doing so at three years. Among the patients randomly assigned to the placebo group, 1.5 percent were receiving an ACE inhibitor at one year, 4.6 percent were doing so at two years, and 8.3 percent were doing so at three years; 68.6 percent of the treated group and 77.7 percent of the placebo group were taking the target dose of 4 mg of trandolapril or placebo, respectively, per day. Of the 2118 patients with diabetes at baseline or new-onset diabetes by February 1, 2002, 402 (19.0 percent) had taken an open-label ACE inhibitor before February 1, 2002; 286 (13.5 percent) did so for the first time after that date.
EFFECTS ON BLOOD PRESSURE
The mean blood pressure on entry into the study (before the run-in phase) was 133±17/78±10 mm Hg in the two groups combined. After 36 months, the pressure had decreased by 1.4±0.3/2.4±0.2 mm Hg in the placebo group and by 4.4±0.3/3.6±0.2 mm Hg in the trandolapril group. The changes in systolic and diastolic pressures were significantly different between the two groups at 36 months (P<0.001).
PRIMARY END POINT
The incidence of the primary end point was 22.5 percent in the placebo group and 21.9 percent in the trandolapril group (hazard ratio in the trandolapril group, 0.96; 95 percent confidence interval; 0.88 to 1.06; P=0.43) (Table 3 and Fig. 1). Adjustment for baseline characteristics (age, sex, and the presence or absence of a history of myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or diabetes) did not alter the results.
Table 3
Table 3
Incidence of the Primary End Point and Its Components and of Death from All Causes.*
Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative Incidence of the Primary End Point, According to Treatment Group.
No benefit in terms of the primary end point was observed among patients assigned to trandolapril in any subgroup defined according to age; sex; race; the presence or absence of a history of myocardial infarction or of a previous revascularization procedure; the presence or absence of diabetes; the serum cholesterol or creatinine concentration; left ventricular function; or the baseline use of diuretic agents, digitalis, aspirin or antiplatelet medication, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, or lipid-lowering drugs. A slight benefit was observed among patients in the trandolapril group in whom the systolic pressure before the run-in phase was less than 140 mm Hg and the diastolic pressure less than 90 mm Hg (hazard ratio as compared with placebo, 0.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.99); no benefit was observed among patients in whom the systolic pressure before the run-in phase was 140 mm Hg or higher or the diastolic pressure 90 mm Hg or higher (hazard ratio as compared with placebo, 1.09; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.25; P=0.02 by a test for interaction). When data for all the patients who received an open-label ACE inhibitor were censored, the hazard ratio for the primary end point in the trandolapril group was 0.95 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.02; P=0.16). The results did not change when data from patients with diabetes were censored at the time they began receiving ACE inhibitors on an open-label basis.
SECONDARY END POINTS AND OTHER OUTCOMES
The estimated hazard ratios for all the prespecified secondary end points in the trandolapril group, as compared with the placebo group, ranged from 0.95 to 0.98, and none were statistically significant (Table 4). Diabetes, although it was not a prespecified end point and although the analysis was not adjusted for multiple comparisons, developed in fewer of the patients assigned to receive trandolapril than of those assigned to receive placebo. In addition, fewer patients in the trandolapril group than in the placebo group were hospitalized with or died of congestive heart failure.
Table 4
Table 4
Incidence of Secondary End Points and Other Outcomes.*
SIDE EFFECTS
Side effects leading to discontinuation of the study medication occurred in 6.5 percent of the patients in the placebo group and 14.4 percent of those in the trandolapril group (P<0.001). The rates of cough (39.1 percent vs. 27.5 percent, P<0.01) and syncope (4.8 percent vs. 3.9 percent, P=0.04) were greater in the trandolapril group than in the placebo group. Angioedema occurred in five patients in the placebo group (two receiving ACE inhibitors on an open-label basis) and eight patients in the trandolapril group.
In the PEACE Trial, 8290 patients with stable coronary artery disease and normal or near-normal left ventricular function were randomly assigned to receive placebo or trandolapril, and no significant differences in the primary end point — a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization — or in prespecified secondary end points were observed. In this trial, the ACE inhibitor trandolapril was used at the dose that had been shown in the Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) Study7 to improve survival and reduce the rate of cardiovascular events and to reduce blood pressure in trials involving subjects with hypertension.25Compliance with the study medication in the PEACE Trial was similar to that in other long-term trials of ACE inhibitors: slightly less than 80 percent of the patients assigned to take an ACE inhibitor and about 5 percent of those assigned to take placebo were receiving active treatment at two years. Randomization to trandolapril was associated with a clear and sustained reduction of 4.5 mm Hg in systolic pressure, as compared with randomization to placebo, in which a reduction of 1.5 mm Hg was observed. It was also associated, in a post hoc analysis, with reductions in the number of patients in whom diabetes developed and the number who required hospitalization for the management of heart failure, as has been observed with other ACE inhibitors.4, 18 These findings provide strong evidence of the pharmacologic activity of the standard dose of trandolapril (4 mg per day).
The SAVE5 and the SOLVD2,4 trials demonstrated that ACE-inhibitor therapy reduced mortality and the rate of development or intensification of heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure and those with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Despite the use of different ACE inhibitors and inclusion criteria, both trials reported the same intriguing secondary finding — that the rate of subsequent myocardial infarction was approximately 20 percent lower among patients randomly assigned to the ACE inhibitor than among those assigned to a placebo.5, 13, 14 These results suggested that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system may produce beneficial effects with respect to atherosclerotic events. Since both of these trials were conducted in patients with impaired left ventricular function and presumed activation of the renin-angiotensin system, the applicability of these findings to populations of patients with normal left ventricular function remained conjectural.
Accordingly, three trials were conducted to test the hypothesis that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system with an ACE inhibitor in patients with vascular disease who do not have overt heart failure reduces the risk of major atherosclerotic events. In HOPE, high-risk patients with vascular disease (including coronary artery disease) or diabetes who did not have heart failure and were not known to have a low ejection fraction were randomly assigned to receive either ramipril or placebo. The trial showed a significant reduction (22 percent) in the primary end point — death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke — with ramipril.15Subsequently, the American Heart Association modified secondary-prevention guidelines, recommending that ACE inhibitors be “considered for all patients with vascular disease.”26
In EUROPA, patients with stable coronary artery disease who did not have clinical evidence of heart failure and who were at a lower risk than the patients in HOPE were randomly assigned to receive perindopril or placebo.16The patients assigned to the ACE inhibitor had a significant reduction (20 percent) in the primary end point — death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or cardiac arrest. Thus, EUROPA showed that the clinical benefits of ACE inhibitors could be extended to a population of patients with coronary artery disease who had a better prognosis than those in HOPE.
In the third trial (the PEACE Trial, the subject of the current report), 8290 patients with stable coronary artery disease and normal or near-normal left ventricular function were randomly assigned to receive trandolapril or placebo; ACE-inhibitor therapy was not found to have a significant benefit. No clinical benefit was observed in the trandolapril group despite the reduction in blood pressure in that group. To interpret the predominantly negative findings of this study in the context of the positive reports from both HOPE15 and EUROPA,16 it is useful to compare the characteristics of the patients and the rates of events in those two trials with those in the PEACE Trial (Fig. 2). At baseline, the patients in the PEACE Trial had an average left ventricular ejection fraction of 58 percent, and their average creatinine and cholesterol concentrations were normal. Their average blood pressure at baseline was 133/78 mm Hg, which was the level achieved with use of an ACE inhibitor in both HOPE and EUROPA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of Outcomes in the PEACE Trial and HOPE
The patients in the PEACE Trial also received more intensive management of risk factors than did those in HOPE and EUROPA. At baseline, 70 percent of the patients (as compared with 29 percent in HOPE and 56 percent in EUROPA) were receiving lipid-lowering therapy. Moreover, 72 percent of the patients in the PEACE Trial, as compared with 54 percent in EUROPA and 40 percent in HOPE, had undergone coronary revascularization before enrollment; this more aggressive strategy might have contributed to the lower risk of adverse events in the PEACE Trial. Therefore, it is not surprising that with more intensive treatment of coronary artery disease and risk-factor modification, adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients assigned to placebo were substantially lower in PEACE than they were in the other two trials. Indeed, among patients assigned to take placebo, the fractions of deaths that were deemed of cardiovascular cause also reflect this difference, at 63 percent in HOPE, 59 percent in EUROPA, and 47 percent in PEACE, as compared with 35 percent in a general population matched according to age and sex with the PEACE Trial cohort.27 Furthermore, despite objective evidence of coronary artery disease among patients in the PEACE Trial and a history of myocardial infarction in 55 percent of them, the annualized rate of death from all causes was only 1.6 percent, similar to that of an age- and sex-matched general population.27
Thus, we hypothesize that the PEACE Trial does not demonstrate the benefits of ACE inhibition shown by HOPE and EUROPA because the patients enrolled in the PEACE Trial were at lower risk for cardiovascular events. This conclusion can be attributed in part to their baseline characteristics, including the documented absence of clinically significant left ventricular dysfunction as well as the prior use of procedures and therapies and in part to ongoing medical management. Indeed, the event rates in the placebo group in the PEACE Trial were not only lower than those in the placebo groups in HOPE or EUROPA; they were also lower than the event rates in the ACE-inhibitor groups in those two previous trials.
The PEACE Trial demonstrates that in a population of patients with coronary artery disease and preserved ejection fraction who receive intensive current standard therapy, usually including coronary revascularization and lipid-lowering agents, and in whom the rate of cardiovascular events is therefore already quite low, there appears to be no evidence of cardiovascular benefit from the addition of ACE inhibitor therapy. Therefore, ACE inhibitors may not be necessary in all such patients to reduce the risk of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. However, physicians may still wish to consider ACE-inhibitor therapy for any patient who does not clearly fit the profile of patients in this trial.
Acknowledgments
Supported by a contract (N01HC65149) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and by Knoll Pharmaceuticals and Abbott Laboratories, which also provided the study medication.
Dr. Braunwald reports having received research grant support and lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck; Dr. Hsia grant support from Novartis; Dr. Pfeffer grant support and lecture fees from Novartis, as well as lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; and Dr. Rouleau consulting fees from Novartis and lecture fees from Pfizer and Novartis. Brigham and Women's Hospital has been awarded patents regarding the use of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system in selected survivors of myocardial infarction; Drs. Pfeffer and Braunwald are among the coinventors. The licensing agreement with Abbott and Novartis is not linked to sales.
Appendix
The following investigators and research coordinators participated in the PEACE Trial (the complete list is available at http://www.bsc.gwu.edu/peace/): Executive Committee — E. Braunwald (co-chair), M.A. Pfeffer (co-chair), M. Domanski, S. Fowler, M. Rice, Y. Rosenberg; Steering Committee — Members of the Executive Committee and M. Dunlap, G. Flaker, N. Geller, B. Gersh, A. Goldberg, J. Hsia, M. Limacher, A. Maggioni, P. Mills, J. Rouleau, J. Warnica, A. Wasserman; Sponsor (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md.) — M. Domanski (project officer), Y. Rosenberg (co-project officer), N. Geller, P. Mills; Clinical and Statistical Coordinating Center (George Washington University, Rockville, Md.) — S. Fowler (principal investigator), P. Cleary, N. Close, T. Davey, J. Green, J. Hsia (Washington, D. C.), K. Jablonski, D. Mason, S. Pakalapati, M. Rice, J. Verter, A. Wasserman, J. Weir, V. Yalamanchili; Italian Coordinating Center (Centro Studi Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri Heart Care Foundation, Florence, Italy) — A. Maggioni (principal investigator), G. Fabbri, M. Gorini, A. Lorimer, D. Lucci,, L. Sarti; Mortality and Morbidity Review Committee — J. Hsia (chair), F. Clemenza, T. Cuddy, A. Goldberg, T. Huynh, A. Maggioni, M. Starling, L. Title, M. Zabalgoitia; Pharmacy Coordinating Center (Veterans Affairs [VA] Cooperative Studies Program, Albuquerque, N.M.) — C. Fye, W. Gagne; Central Biochemistry Laboratory (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis) — M. Steffes (principal investigator), J. Bucksa, G. Rynders; Data and Safety Monitoring Board — R. Frye (chair), E. Cooper, C. Davis, C. Grimes, N. Nanda, E. Pellegrino. United States Clinical Centers (in order of enrollment): Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (VAMC), Cleveland — M. Dunlap, J. Ortiz, R. Fleegle, A. Armstrong; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit — S. Jafri, A. Goldberg, D. Frank, K. Piotrowski; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles — A. Kotlewski, P. Mahrer, R. Browning II; VAMC, Asheville, N.C. — A. Sharma, S. Nediratta, G. Ely, V. Allen; Hendersonville Cardiology, Hendersonville, N.C. — P. Goodfield, K. Tredinnick; Heart Clinic Arkansas, Little Rock — R. Hundley, V. Mabry, T. Sparrow, P. Cunningham; University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kans. — S. Owens, D. Nelson; Portland Cardiovascular Institute, Portland, Oreg. — S. Lewis, D. Kelley; VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Mich. — M. Starling, C. Majors; University of Missouri, Columbia — G. Flaker, K. Belew; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. — R. Rodeheffer, P. Anderson; Altru Hospital, Grand Forks, N.D. — E. Dodin, D. Vold; Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia — J. Wertheimer, V. McKinney; Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore — P. Ouyang and J. Wingo; Cardiology Associates of Palm Beach, Atlantis, Fla. — N. Erenrich, C. Grumbach; Asheville Cardiology Associates, Asheville, N.C. — D. Serfas, D. Oskins; River Cities Cardiology, Jeffersonville, Ind. — D. Denny, B. Van Vactor; St. Louis University, St. Louis — B. Chaitman, S. Aubuchon; Cardiovascular Associates, Denver — C. Brachfeld, B. McKinster; Cardiovascular Associates of Northern Wisconsin, Wausau — T. Logemann, D. Joyce; Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock — E. Smith, R. Pacheco; University of Florida-VAMC, Gainesville — M. Limacher, B. Bryant; Albany Associates in Cardiology, Albany, N.Y. — D. Wolinsky, L. West-lake-Hicks; Charlotte Heart Group Research Center, Port Charlotte, Fla. — M. Lopez, R. Schenks; State University of New York at Buffalo General Hospital, Buffalo — S. Graham, J. Jackson; Cardiology Associates, Rapid City, S.D. — S. Durr, R. De Raad; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston — S. Solomon, R. Mercier; Mid-Valley Cardiology, Kingston, N.Y. — E. Lader, M. Meyer; Iowa Heart Center, Des Moines — W. Wickemeyer, N. Young; Gulfcoast Veterans Health Care System Hospital, Biloxi, Miss. — B. Omar, L. Clark; Louisiana State University, Shreveport — P. Reddy, T. Norwood; Heart Center, Salt Lake City — J. Perry, T. Romero; Pikes Peak Cardiology, Colorado Springs, Colo. — T. Eastburn, K. Hicks; South Texas Cardiovascular Consultants, San Antonio — A. Jain, L. Limon; VCU Medical Center, Richmond, Va. — G. Vetrovec, K. Damico; University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y. — C.-S. Liang, E. Perkins; George Washington University, Washington, D.C. — R. Katz, J. Arevalo; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City — U. Thadani, M. Thresher; Androscoggin Cardiology Associates, Auburn, Me. — R. Weiss, B. Brennan; Appleton Heart Institute, Appleton, Wis. — P. Ackell, M. Noble; Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, N.C. — F. Kahl, S. Soots; Winthrop University, Mineola, N.Y. — K. Marzo, P. Hodnett; Heart and Vascular Institute of Texas, San Antonio — J. Seaworth, S. Farris; Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Mass. — L. Jiang, M. Duquette; Community Hospitals of Indianapolis, Indianapolis — D. Ziperman, J. Greene-Nashold; William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich. — G. Timmis, C. Clark; Nisus Research, Northern Michigan Hospital, Petoskey — H. Colfer, M. Ronquist; University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky. — S. Wagner, M. Olliges; Creighton Cardiac Center, Omaha, Nebr. — S. Mohiuddin, L. Rasmussen; Brevard Cardiology Physicians, Merritt Island, Fla. — K. Sheikh, T. Hengerer-Yates; University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, N.J. — S. Palmeri, L. Casazza; Oklahoma Heart Institute, Tulsa — W. Leimbach, Jr., D. Ritter; University of Texas, San Antonio — M. Zabalgoitia, A. Paredes; Mid-Atlantic Permanente Group, Fairfax, Va. — J. Golden, B. McCaskill; Providence Hospital, Livonia, Mich. — W. Duvernoy, D. Cunningham; Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson — S. Goldman, J. Ohm; Regions Hospital, St. Paul, Minn. — J. McBride, B. Foster; Northwestern University, Chicago — R. Rosenson, K. Dahle; HeartCare Midwest, Peoria, Ill. — P. Schmidt, C. Ness; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla. — J. Patton, C. Davison; Oakwood Hospital, Medical Center, Dearborn, Mich. — A. Riba, C. Draus; St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York — E. Herzog, D. Tormey; Cardiac Care Associates, Fairfax, Va. — A. Keller, M. Obeid; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston — G. Hendrix, M. Schulz; Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus — J. Larry, J. Homan; Hunterdon Cardiology Associates, Flemington, N.J. — A. Kutscher, Jr.; South Shore Cardiology, South Weymouth, Mass. — W. Calhoon, S. Medici; VAMC, Pittsburgh — M. Amidi, M. Bell; Cook County Hospital, Chicago — S. Khadra, J. Bax; Southeastern Cardiology Consultants, Montgomery, Ala. — K. Wool, J. Parker; Mercy Hospital Anderson, Cincinnati — M. Smith, P. Feick; VAMC, Newington, Conn. — P. Schulman, J. Folger; Consultants in Cardiovascular Medicine, Melrose Park, Ill. — J. Shanes, K. Guard; Hawthorne Medical Associates, North Dartmouth, Mass. — S. Solomon, M. English; Compass Medical Associates, Abington, Mass. — J. Ellis, D. Kelly; Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa. — F. Menapace, Jr., M. Kleman; Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, N.Y. — P. Fitzpatrick, A. Sass; Rochester Cardiopulmonary Group, Rochester, N.Y. — J. Gillespie, L. Cohen; Main Line Health Heart Center, Wynnewood, Pa. — P. Kowey, S. Heaney; Hahnemann University, Philadelphia — W. Kussmaul, L. Mark; Bay Area Cardiology Associates, Brandon, Fla. — W. Bugni, S. Sweeney; Lindner Clinical Trial Center, Cincinnati — D. Kereiakes, K. Ibanez; New York University Medical Center, New York — W. Slater, B. Guerra; Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, New York — E. Brown, Jr., A. Valeria; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston — M. Fifer, P. Benard; Pharmacotherapy Research Associates, Zanesville, Ohio — C. Feicht, K. Crist; Albany Medical College, Albany, N.Y. — R. Capone, T. Omorogbe; Charles River Medical Associates, Natick, Mass. — V. Desai, J. Pierre-Louis; Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif. — K. Jutzy, V. Bishop; St. Francis Hospital, Evanston, Ill. — S. Dadkhah, A. Fisch; Staten Island University, New York — T. Costantino, M. Basilious; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh — T. Smitherman, D. Rosenfelder; Inland Cardiology Associates, Spokane, Wash. — D. Canaday, J. Baxter; Spokane Heart Research Foundation, Spokane, Wash. — M. DeWood; Heart Institute, Omaha, Nebr. — D. Chapman, W. Olson; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Fla. — G. Lamas, S. Hussein; Brooklyn Hospital Center, New York — R. Stein, J. Varvatsas; University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock — E. Smith, C. Davison; Mount Clemens General Hospital, Mount Clemens, Mich. — J. Kazmierski, K. O'Mara; Florida Heart and Vascular Associates, Tampa — J. Smith, C. Cromer; Sturdy Memorial Hospital, Attleboro, Mass. — J. DiCola, S. Dolan; St. Louis VAMC, St. Louis — W. Martin, H. Manns; Oklahoma Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, Oklahoma City — R. Kipperman, Y. Zhang; Cardiology Consultants, Woodbury, N.Y. — D. Grossman, B. Morrison; Raritan Bay Medical Center, Perth Amboy, N.J. — A. Chiaramida, R. Gaven; White Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles — V. DeQuattro, Z. Song; Endovascular Research, Eugene, Oreg. — P. Bergin, J. Masengil; University of Tennessee, Knoxville — D. Ely, F. Reynolds; San Diego Cardiovascular Research Associates, Encinitas, Calif. — G. Dennish, III, N. Horton; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor — E. Bates, A. Luciano; University of South Carolina, Columbia — J. Moloo, M. Kaminski; Washington University, St. Louis — E. Geltman, J. Flanagan; Carl T. Hayden VAMC, Phoenix, Ariz. — J. Felicetta, L. Beckner; King/Drew Medical Center, Los Angeles — V. Kaushik, A. Mueco; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz. — R. Lee, A. Metcalf; IHC Clinical Research Foundation, Salt Lake City — R. Fowles, K. Summers; Oregon Clinical Research Trials, Eugene — M. Heerema, M. Jacobson; VAMC, North-port, N.Y. — P. Diggs, M. Roeske; Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants, Decatur, Ill. — R. Rosenstein; Oregon Clinic, Portland — D. Dawley, D. Dorst. Canadian Clinical Centers (in order of enrollment): Foothills Hospital, Calgary — J. Warnica, B. Smith, L. Walker, D. Scarcelli; Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg — J. Tam, T. Cuddy, P. Courcelles, N. Miller; Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal — G. Gosselin, A. Ducharme, J. Marquis, M. Lamy; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax — L. Title, D. Johnstone, M. Francis, J. Cossett; Centre Hospital Beauce Etchemin, St. Georges Beauce — D. Dion, R. St.-Hilaire, A. Morissette, F. Poulin; London Health Sciences Centre, London — M. Arnold, M. Krupa; Centre Hospital de la Region de l'Amiante, Thetford Mines — M. Boulianne, J. Campeau, F. Ouimet, B. Roberge; Montreal General Hospital, Montreal — T. Huynh, S. Finkenbine, B. St. Jacques, C. Boudreault; Brampton Research Associates, Brampton — D. Borts, N. Bonafede, J. Burtcher, C. Edwards; Dr. R.S. Baigrie, Sudbury — R. Baigrie, F. Gee, J. Judge, K. Reilly; Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, Vancouver — V. Bernstein, K. MacDonald, S. Mooney; Laval Hospital, Ste.-Foy — J. Rouleau, R. Vienneau; Lake-shore General Hospital, Pointe-Clair — J.-P. Mayer, S. Mitges; Neureka Research Incorporated, Sudbury — S. Nawaz, R. Dhaliwal; Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire de Québec Pavillion Enfant Jesus, Quebec — P. Talbot, M. Talbot; Health Sciences Centre, St. John's — B. Sussex, S. Newman; University of Ottawa, Ottawa — M. Baird M. Fraser; Hôp. Notre-Dame, Montreal — C. Guimond, J. Leboeuf; St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto — G. Moe, D. Day; Innovative Cardiac Care, Saskatoon — G. Rajakumar, B. Kroeger; Saskatoon — M. Khouri, N. Zello; Group Health Centre, Sault Ste. Marie — H. Lee, K. Barban; London Health Sciences Centre-University Campus, London — W. Kostuk, A.-M. Powell; Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal — M. Smilovitch, V. Toyota; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Hotel-Dieu, Montreal — D. Phaneuf, R. Duclos; Hop. Saint-Luc Du CHUM, Montreal — G. Goulet, L. Primeau; Windsor — T. Machel, J.Morash; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal — D. Gossard, L. Boutin; Cambridge — S. Vizel, B. Fox; St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton — E. Stanton, M. Lawrence; Sullivan Cardiology Associates, Hamilton — H. Sullivan, R. Paterson; Odyssey Research Services, Victoria — G. Hoag, K. Ilott; Prince George Regional Hospital, Prince George — J. Dufton, R. Sweeney. Puerto Rican Clinical Centers (in order of enrollment): University of Puerto Rico, San Juan — M. Garcia-Palmieri, H. Banchs, M. Gonzalez, M. Perez; Centro Cardiovascular de Caguas, Caguas — P. Colon, Sr., N. Vazquez. Italian Clinical Centers (in order of enrollment): Ospedale Civile, Passirana-Rho — C. Schweiger, A. Frisinghelli; Ospedale Cardinale Panico, Tricase — A. Galati, P. Palma; Ospedale G.F. Ingrassia, Palermo — P. Di Pasquale, F. Clemenza; Ospedale San Bartolomeo, Sarzana — G. Filorizzo, R. Petacchi; Ospedale di Circolo Zappatoni, Cassano d'Adda — R. Cogo, M. Ferrari; Presidio Ospedale Villa Sofia, Palermo — A. Battaglia, F. Mancino; Ospedale Civile, Policoro — B. D'Alessandro, L. Truncellito; Pres Ospedale S. Maria della Speranza, Battipaglia — M. Maina, S. Romanzi; Ospedale S. Sebastiano di Caserta — C. Chieffo, A. Cardillo; Ospedale Ignazio Veris Delli Ponti, Scorrano — E. De Lorenzi, A. Bergarno; Ospedale Cardarelli, Napoli — A. Boccalatte, G. Gaeta; Presidio Ospedale, Montebelluna — G. Neri, G. Masaro; Policlinico Catanzaro, Catanzaro — F. Perticone, R. Maio; Ospedale Riuniti, Foggia — M. De Biase, M. Carrone; Fondazione S. Maugeri Clinica del Lavoro, Cassano delle Murge — D. Scrutinio, R. La Gioia; Ospedale Civile, Lanciano — L. Leonzio, D. Tullio; Ospedale Generale di Zona Valduce, Como — M. Santarone, L. Tagliagambe; Presidio Ospedale, Rovigo — P. Zonzin, M. Capanna; Ospedale A. Ajello, Mazara Del Vallo — N. Di Giovanni, I. Fiore; Ospedale Riuniti, Bergamo — A. Gavazzi, D. Mazzoleni; Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna — G. Pinelli, M. Ribani; Ospedale Garibaldi, Catania — S. Mangiameli, V. Rubino; Ospedale L. Sacco, Milan — M. Viecca, R. Sala; Ospedale San Michele Brotzu, Cagliari — M. Porcu, S. Salis; Ospedale S. Maria Della Pietà, Camerino — R. Amici, G. Patteri; Ospedale Civile Mellini, Chiari — F. Bortolini, A. Turelli; Ospedale Civile Santa Maria Delle Croci, Ravenna — A. Maresta, G. Dalla Valle; Ospedale Civile Sant'Antonio Abate, Trapani — G. Braschi, M. Abrignani; Ospedale SS. Annunziata, Sassari — P. Terrosu, M.Castellaccio; Ospedale San Giovanni, Rome — A. Boccanelli, P. Morosetti; Ospedale Generale Provinciale Lotti, Pontedera — G. Tartarini, D. Levantesi; Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza — A. Grieco, A. Cazzaniga; Ospedale di Circolo Galmarini, Tradate — G. Poggio, S. Giani; Ospedale Sant'Anna, Como — G. Ferrari, R. Belluschi; Spedali Riuniti, Pistoia — F. Del Citerna, E. Balli; Presidio Ospedale, Cittadella — P. Maiolino, L. Pedon; Ospedale Vincenzo Monaldi, Naples — N. Mininni, V. Monda.
1. The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS) N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1429–35. [PubMed]
2. The SOLVD Investigators Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293–302. [PubMed]
3. Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:303–10. [PubMed]
4. The SOLVD Investigators Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:685–91. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 1992;327:1768.] [PubMed]
5. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moyeé LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:669–77. [PubMed]
6. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. Lancet. 1993;342:821–8. [PubMed]
7. Køber L, Torp-Pedersen C, Carlsen JE, et al. A clinical trial of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor trandolapril in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1670–6. [PubMed]
8. Ambrosioni E, Borghi C, Magnani B. The effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor zofenopril on mortality and morbidity after anterior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:80–5. [PubMed]
9. Flather MD, Yusuf S, Kober L, et al. Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data from individual patients. Lancet. 2000;355:1575–81. [PubMed]
10. Braunwald E. ACE inhibitors — a cornerstone of the treatment of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:351–3. [PubMed]
11. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:2101–13. [PubMed]
12. Remme WJ, Swedberg K. Comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4:11–22. [PubMed]
13. Yusuf S, Pepine CJ, Garces C, et al. Effect of enalapril on myocardial infarction and unstable angina in patients with low ejection fractions. Lancet. 1992;340:1173–8. [PubMed]
14. Rutherford JD, Pfeffer MA, Moyé LA, et al. Effects of captopril on ischemic events after myocardial infarction: results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. Circulation. 1994;90:1731–8. [PubMed]
15. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145–53. [Errata, N Engl J Med 2000;342:748,1376.] [PubMed]
16. Fox KM. Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study) Lancet. 2003;362:782–8. [PubMed]
17. Pfeffer MA, Domanski M, Rosenberg Y, et al. Prevention of events with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (the PEACE Study design) Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:25H–30H. [PubMed]
18. Yusuf S, Gerstein H, Hoogwerf B, et al. Ramipril and the development of diabetes. JAMA. 2001;286:1882–5. [PubMed]
19. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:213–29. [PubMed]
20. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851–60. [PubMed]
21. Shih JH. Sample size estimation for complex clinical trials with survival endpoints. Control Clin Trials. 1995;16:395–407. [PubMed]
22. Lan KKG, DeMets DL. Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika. 1983;70:659–63.
23. Lan KKG, Lachin JM. Implementation of group sequential logrank tests in a maximum duration trial. Biometrics. 1990;46:759–70. [PubMed]
24. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc [B] 1972;34:187–220.
25. Guay DR. Trandolapril: a newer angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Clin Ther. 2003;25:713–75. [PubMed]
26. Smith SC, Jr., Blair SN, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACC scientific statement: AHA/ACC guidelines for preventing heart attack and death in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: 2001 update: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2001;104:1577–9. [PubMed]
27. Anderson RN, Smith BL. Deaths: leading causes for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003;52:1–86. [PubMed]