Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of bmjThe BMJ
BMJ. 1995 September 23; 311(7008): 793–796.
PMCID: PMC2550793

Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction.


The merits or otherwise of publishing hospital specific death rates are much debated. This article compares the relative sensitivity of measures of process and outcome to differences in quality of care for the hospital treatment of myocardial infarction. Aspects of hospital care that have a proved impact on mortality from myocardial infarction are identified, and the results from meta-analysis and large randomised controlled trials are used to estimate the impact that optimal use of these interventions would have on mortality in a typical district general hospital. Sample size calculations are then performed to determine how many years of data would be needed to detect significant differences between hospitals. A comparison is then made with the amount of data that would be needed to detect significant differences if information about process of care was being collected. Process measures based on the results of randomised controlled trials were found to be able to detect relevant differences between hospitals that would not be identified by comparing hospital specific mortality, which is an insensitive indicator of the quality of care.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.1M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Clarke A, McKee M, Appleby J, Sheldon T. Efficient purchasing. BMJ. 1993 Dec 4;307(6917):1436–1437. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dillner L. Scottish death rates published with health warning. BMJ. 1994 Dec 17;309(6969):1599–1600. [PubMed]
  • Selker HP. Systems for comparing actual and predicted mortality rates: characteristics to promote cooperation in improving hospital care. Ann Intern Med. 1993 May 15;118(10):820–822. [PubMed]
  • Rowan KM, Kerr JH, Major E, McPherson K, Short A, Vessey MP. Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method. BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):977–981. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE, Draper EA. Variations in mortality and length of stay in intensive care units. Ann Intern Med. 1993 May 15;118(10):753–761. [PubMed]
  • Haines A, Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488–1492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 23;327(4):248–254. [PubMed]

Articles from The BMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group