PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jcmPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJCM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
J Clin Microbiol. Oct 2003; 41(10): 4740–4744.
PMCID: PMC254362
Practical Disk Diffusion Method for Detection of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
K. R. Fiebelkorn,* S. A. Crawford, M. L. McElmeel, and J. H. Jorgensen
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, and Microbiology Laboratory, University Hospital, San Antonio, Texas 78229
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., MC 7750, San Antonio, TX 78229-3750. Phone: (210) 567-3100. Fax: (210) 567-2367. E-mail: fiebelkorn/at/uthscsa.edu.
Received July 23, 2003; Revised July 11, 2003; Accepted July 28, 2003.
Resistance to macrolides in staphylococci may be due to active efflux (encoded by msrA) or ribosomal target modification (macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B [MLSB] resistance; usually encoded by ermA or ermC). MLSB resistance is either constitutive or inducible following exposure to a macrolide. Induction tests utilize closely approximated erythromycin and clindamycin disks; the flattening of the clindamycin zone adjacent to the erythromycin disk indicates inducible MLSB resistance. The present study reassessed the reliability of placing erythromycin and clindamycin disks in adjacent positions (26 to 28 mm apart) in a standard disk dispenser, compared to distances of 15 or 20 mm. A group of 130 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and 100 isolates of erythromycin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were examined by disk approximation; all CNS isolates and a subset of S. aureus isolates were examined by PCR for ermA, ermC, and msrA. Of 114 erythromycin-resistant S. aureus isolates, 39 demonstrated constitutive resistance to clindamycin, while 33 showed inducible resistance by disk approximation at all three distances. Only one isolate failed to clearly demonstrate induction at 26 mm. Of 82 erythromycin-resistant CNS isolates that contained ermA or ermC, 57 demonstrated constitutive clindamycin resistance, and 25 demonstrated inducible resistance, at 20 and 26 mm. None of the 42 S. aureus isolates or 18 CNS isolates containing only msrA and none of the erythromycin-susceptible isolates yielded positive disk approximation tests. Simple placement of erythromycin and clindamycin disks at a distance achieved with a standard disk dispenser allowed detection of 97% of S. aureus strains and 100% of CNS strains with inducible MLSB resistance in this study.
Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents generally involves drug inactivation, target site modification, impermeability, or efflux mechanisms. Macrolide antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) may be due to an active efflux mechanism encoded by msrA (conferring resistance to macrolides and type B streptogramins only) (16, 17) or may be due to ribosomal target modification, affecting macrolides, lincosamides, and type B streptogramins (MLSB resistance). erm genes encode enzymes that confer inducible or constitutive resistance to MLS agents via methylation of the 23S rRNA, reducing binding by MLS agents to the ribosome (15). Resistance is induced by the binding of a macrolide to upstream translational attenuator sequences, leading to changes in mRNA secondary structure, exposure of the ribosomal binding site, and translation of the erm methylase. Alterations in these 5′ upstream sequences, including deletions, duplications, and other mutations, lead to constitutive expression of the methylase gene and constitutive MLSB resistance (1, 15, 24). Strains with inducible MLSB resistance (MLSBi) strains demonstrate in vitro resistance to 14- and 15-member macrolides (e.g., erythromycin), while appearing susceptible to 16-member macrolides, lincosamides, and type B streptogramins; strains with constitutive MLSB resistance (MLSBc strains) show in vitro resistance to all of these agents (15).
MLS antibiotics are commonly used in treatment of staphylococcal infections. Clindamycin is a frequent choice for some staphylococcal infections, particularly skin and soft-tissue infections, and as an alternative in the penicillin-allergic patient. Inducible MLSB resistance is not recognized by using standard susceptibility test methods, including standard broth-based or agar dilution susceptibility tests. Failure to identify inducible MLSB resistance may lead to clinical failure of clindamycin therapy (3). Conversely, labeling all erythromycin-resistant staphylococci as clindamycin resistant prevents the use of clindamycin in infections caused by truly clindamycin-susceptible staphylococcal isolates.
Low levels of erythromycin are the most effective inducer of inducible MLSB resistance (23). To detect MLSBi strains, there are special disk approximation tests that incorporate erythromycin induction of clindamycin resistance (23). These tests involve the placement of an erythromycin disk in close proximity to a disk containing clindamycin or lincomycin. As the erythromycin diffuses through the agar, resistance to the lincosamide is induced, resulting in a flattening or blunting of the lincosamide zone of inhibition adjacent to the erythromycin disk, giving a D shape to the zone (D-zone effect). Jenssen and colleagues suggested that closer spacing than in a standard disk dispenser was necessary to discern inducible resistance, with optimal spacing of 10 to 15 mm (6); 20-mm spacing of disks and a higher concentration of erythromycin (30 μg) have also been suggested (18).
In this study, we reassessed the reliability of simply placing erythromycin and clindamycin disks in adjacent positions in a standard disk dispenser and compared it to that of special disk approximation tests that employ closer disk spacing. The ability of disk induction tests to predict the resistance genotype was determined by performing PCR for the ermA, ermC, and msrA genes with a selected group of S. aureus and CNS clinical isolates.
Selection of test strains.
A group of 130 isolates of S. aureus and 100 isolates of CNS were selected from recent (1998 to 2003) clinical isolates recovered in our laboratory; duplicate isolates were not included. One hundred fourteen S. aureus isolates were selected based on erythromycin resistance by standard NCCLS disk diffusion testing (12); approximately one-third of these were methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates. Strains that appeared susceptible to clindamycin and those that appeared resistant by standard disk testing were also included. An additional 16 erythromycin- and clindamycin-susceptible isolates of S. aureus were randomly selected. Similarly, 100 CNS isolates were selected based on erythromycin resistance by standard disk testing or by testing with the Vitek 2 instrument (bioMerieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.). CNS isolates were identified to the species level with the Vitek 2 GPC ID card (9).
Quality control strains.
Control strains for disk diffusion tests included S. aureus ATCC 25923 (macrolide and clindamycin susceptible, negative for ermA, ermC, and msrA) and S. aureus 58-424, which contained ermA and demonstrated inducible MLSB resistance (F. C. Tenover, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Positive controls for PCR included reference strains S. aureus RN1551 (containing ermA; F. C. Tenover), S. aureus RN4220 (with plasmid pE194 containing ermC; J. Sutcliffe, Pfizer, Inc.), and S. aureus RN4220 (with plasmid pAT10 containing msrA; J. Sutcliffe).
Disk diffusion tests.
The standard NCCLS disk diffusion test was performed on each isolate using unsupplemented Mueller-Hinton agar (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) and standard 15-μg erythromycin disks and 2-μg clindamycin disks (Becton Dickinson). For the first part of the experiment, a standard disk diffusion dispenser (Becton Dickinson) was used to dispense the two test disks. This resulted in a distance of 28 mm from disk edge to disk edge if the disks were placed in peripheral positions in the dispenser or 26 mm if the disks were placed in interior positions. For S. aureus isolates, on the same agar plates, two additional pairs of disks were placed by hand to provide distances of 15 and 20 mm between the respective erythromycin-clindamycin disk pairs. For CNS isolates, only 20- and 26-mm placements were used. Following incubation for 16 to 18 h at 35°C, zone diameters were measured in the usual manner; significant ingrowth within a zone up to the edge of the disk was considered constitutive resistance. In addition, each clindamycin zone was examined carefully by using both incident light to examine the plate against a dark background and transmitted light to detect any flattening or blunting of the shape of the clindamycin zone, indicating inducible resistance.
Preparation of whole-cell DNA.
Whole-cell DNA from S. aureus and CNS isolates was extracted with the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, Calif.), with the following modifications. Approximately 25 colonies from an overnight growth on a sheep blood agar plate were suspended in 1 ml of 10 mM NaPO4 buffer, pH 7.0, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) with 20 μl of lysostaphin (1 mg/ml) (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Mo.), and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min. Proteinase K and buffer AL were added according to the QIAamp DNA minikit protocol D for bacteria. Lysates were then applied to QIAamp spin columns, and total DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's protocol. Extracted DNA was stored at −20°C until PCR was performed.
PCR for ermA, ermC, and msrA genes.
Multiplex PCR was performed with oligonucleotide primers specific for the ermA and ermC genes as described by Khan and colleagues, amplifying 610- (ermA) and 520-bp (ermC) gene fragments (8). Each reaction was carried out in a final volume of 50 μl and included 5 μl of 10× PCR buffer (MgCl2 free; 200 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.4], 500 mM KCl) (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.), 4 μl of 50 mM MgCl2 (Invitrogen), 1 μl each of dATP, dTTP, dCTP, and dGTP (10 mM; Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, Calif.), 1 μl each of the ermA forward primer, the ermA reverse primer, the ermC forward primer, and the ermC reverse primer (50 μM; Sigma Genosys, The Woodlands, Tex.), 31.75 μl of molecular grade water, 0.25 μl of AmpliTaq Gold Taq polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Inc.), and 1 μl of extracted template DNA. Amplification was performed using a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). Reaction mixtures were initially heated for 10 min at 95°C (hot start) and then underwent 35 cycles of amplification. Each cycle consisted of a 60-s denaturation step at 95°C, a 55-s annealing step at 53°C, and a 60-s extension step at 72°C. The extension step of the final cycle was extended by 5 min. PCR for the msrA efflux gene was performed with primers described by Lina and colleagues that amplified a 940-bp product (10). Each reaction was carried out in a final volume of 50 μl and was identical to those for ermA/ermC multiplex PCR, with the substitution of 1 μl each of the msrA forward primer and the msrA reverse primer (50 μM) and 33.75 μl of molecular-grade water. Thermocycling conditions included a 10-min hot start at 95°C and 35 cycles of amplification, with each cycle consisting of a 45-s denaturation step at 94°C, a 60-s annealing step at 52°C, and a 60-s extension step at 72°C. The extension step of the final cycle was extended by 5 min. PCR products were stored at 4°C until they were analyzed by gel electrophoresis. Positive and negative controls were included in each run. Positive controls for ermA and ermC included reference strains S. aureus RN1551 and S. aureus RN4220 (with ermC); S. aureus RN4220 (with msrA) served as a positive control for msrA. S. aureus ATCC 29213 (negative for ermA, ermC, and msrA) was tested multiple times with each primer set. Molecular-grade water (1 μl) was substituted for template DNA as the negative control included in every run.
Gel electrophoresis.
Amplified DNA was detected by gel electrophoresis through 1.8% agarose gels containing 0.5 μg of ethidium bromide/ml for 90 min at 100 V. The sizes of the PCR products were estimated with standard molecular weight markers (Hi-Lo DNA marker; Minnesota Molecular, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.). Isolates were considered positive for ermA, ermC, or msrA in the presence of the respective PCR products of the expected sizes.
Results of disk induction testing for S. aureus and CNS are shown in Table Table1.1. Examples of disk induction test phenotypes are shown in Fig. Fig.1.1. The sensitivities of disk induction testing for detection of MLSBi strains containing ermA or ermC were 100% at 15 and 20 mm and 97% (33 of 34) at 26 to 28 mm for S. aureus. Sensitivity was 100% at both 20 and 26 mm for CNS. Induction testing was also specific; none of the 16 erythromycin-susceptible S. aureus isolates demonstrated any flattening or blunting of the clindamycin or erythromycin zones. For S. aureus isolates with an inducible MLSB phenotype, the mean clindamycin zone size was 24.9 mm (range, 23 to 27 mm); for clindamycin-susceptible isolates, mean zone size was 25.4 mm (range, 21 to 27 mm). For CNS, inducible isolates had a mean clindamycin zone size of 28.5 mm (range, 21 to 32 mm) and susceptible isolates had a mean zone size of 28.5 mm (range, 21 to 35 mm). An inducible MLSB phenotype could not be predicted based on the size of the clindamycin zone of inhibition.
TABLE 1.
TABLE 1.
Detection of inducible lincosamide resistance by disk induction testing with erythromycin and clindamycin disks at different distances
FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Disk induction testing. (A) Positive disk induction test within a routine disk diffusion format (CNS; University Hospital). Erythromycin and clindamycin disks were placed in adjacent central positions in a standard disk dispenser. (B to D) Constitutive (more ...)
Thirty S. aureus isolates (23%) showed significant ingrowth within a larger clindamycin zone; this represented 77% of S. aureus isolates with a constitutive MLSB phenotype. Interestingly, a subset of 20 of these isolates showed blunting of the outer zone at 15 or 20 mm (Fig. (Fig.1D),1D), including one that showed blunting at 26 to 28 mm. Disk testing was repeated for isolates showing significant ingrowth by selecting colonies in both confluent and light-growth areas to rule out mixed cultures; repeat testing from single colonies revealed the same results. Of 19 S. aureus isolates with significant ingrowth that were available for genetic analysis, 18 contained ermA (including all 12 isolates with blunting of the outer zone that were available for analysis) and 1 contained ermC. Four CNS isolates showed this effect; three contained ermC (two S. epidermidis isolates and one S. simulans isolate), and one contained ermA (S. epidermidis) (Fig. (Fig.1C).1C). Growth within the clindamycin zone of inhibition was considered indicative of the constitutive MLSB phenotype and was easily discernible on examination with reflected light in all S. aureus and CNS isolates showing significant clindamycin zone ingrowth.
A subset of 86 S. aureus isolates and all 100 CNS isolates were available for genetic analysis (Table (Table2).2). All clindamycin-susceptible isolates with a negative disk approximation test contained msrA, but not ermA or ermC. The majority of S. aureus isolates tested possessed only one resistance mechanism; five (6%) possessed an erm gene plus msrA. A total of 12 (12%) CNS isolates (including 5 S. epidermidis isolates and 7 S. haemolyticus isolates) possessed two or more resistance genes. Four isolates of S. haemolyticus contained all three resistance determinants and showed a constitutive MLSB resistance phenotype (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B). One S. simulans isolate with obvious constitutive MLSB resistance was repeatedly positive only for the efflux determinant msrA, in the absence of both ermA and ermC (Table (Table33).
TABLE 2.
TABLE 2.
Resistance genotypes of erythromycin-resistant isolates of S. aureus and CNS
TABLE 3.
TABLE 3.
Phenotype and genotype distribution of CNS by species
This study has demonstrated that careful examination of the shape of the clindamycin zone adjacent to a standard 15-μg erythromycin disk in a conventional disk diffusion test can serve to detect S. aureus or CNS strains with inducible resistance to clindamycin. Flattening of the clindamycin disk diffusion zone in an erythromycin-resistant isolate (D-zone effect) appears to be a reliable indicator of MLSBi strains that harbor either the ermA or ermC gene. Constitutively MLSB-resistant strains are easily recognized by a clindamycin zone diameter of ≤14 mm with or without significant ingrowth. Erythromycin-susceptible strains do not possess inducible clindamycin resistance.
In our study, the majority of S. aureus isolates with constitutive MLSB resistance showed significant ingrowth in the clindamycin zone (an outer zone of confluent growth and an inner zone of lighter growth extending to the edge of the disk); all but one isolate available for genotypic analysis contained ermA. Di Modugno and colleagues described this phenomenon for staphylococcal isolates with ermA; they described two end points obtained by broth microdilution, with a transition first from confluent to light growth and then from light growth to no growth (2). Single methylation of the ribosomal target by the ErmA methylase versus dimethylation by the ErmC methylase may be related to this phenomenon, or other factors may be involved. The explanation for significant ingrowth in one S. aureus isolate and three CNS isolates containing ermC is unclear. However, this phenomenon was easily recognized in disk tests and did not lead to reporting false clindamycin susceptibility.
The flattening of the clindamycin zone of inhibition by an adjacent erythromycin disk is more obvious if the two disks are placed closer together than the standard 26- to 28-mm spacing of a standard disk dispenser. A distance of 15 or 20 mm between disks provided the most obvious flattening of the clindamycin zones among the strains examined in this study. However, simply placing the erythromycin and clindamycin disks in adjacent positions in a normal disk pattern (especially in the central positions, resulting in 26-mm disk separation) appears to provide a reliable means of detection of the MLSBi strains in a clinical laboratory setting without specialized testing or nonstandard disk placement. Jenssen and colleagues were able to predict the erm genotype by disk induction testing using a disk spacing of 10 to 15 mm (6). Using disk spacing achieved with a standard disk dispenser (26 to 28 mm), we also correlated disk induction testing with the presence of erm genes and were able to detect an MLSBi phenotype in all but one of the clinical S. aureus isolates tested and in all CNS isolates. The S. simulans isolate with obvious constitutive clindamycin resistance and positive only for the efflux determinant msrA may contain another lincosamide resistance mechanism not detected in this study, such as one encoded by ermB, which has rarely been reported in staphylococcal isolates primarily of animal origin (4, 10, 20). Other lincomycin resistance elements in staphylococci previously described, such as lincosamide-modifying enzymes, could also be involved (15).
In 1969, McGehee and colleagues demonstrated the development of clindamycin resistance in vivo and in vitro in erythromycin-resistant staphylococci (11). Other investigators have confirmed the rapid in vitro conversion of inducible to constitutive MLSB resistance in staphylococci (14, 24). There have also been a number of reported clindamycin or lincomycin therapy failures in serious infections due to staphylococci with inducible MLSB resistance, indicating that it is not uncommon (3, 5, 11, 21, 22; G. G. Rao, Letter, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:715). This has led to questioning the safety of clindamycin use against any erythromycin-resistant staphylococci. Because of the high reported incidence of inducible MLSB resistance, particularly in S. aureus (5), it has been suggested that in vitro erythromycin resistance could serve as a surrogate for all MLS agents, regardless of susceptibility test results, and that disk induction testing be performed on isolates from serious CNS infections (18).
Some published studies have indicated that approximately 45% of erythromycin-resistant S. aureus isolates have inducible MLSB resistance (6, 19); that is, for almost every isolate showing constitutive clindamycin resistance (easily discernible by standard methods), there is an isolate with inducible resistance that would go unrecognized without disk induction testing. However, the incidence of constitutive and inducible MLSB resistance varies by geographic region and even from hospital to hospital, with some studies showing high local incidence of either constitutive or inducible MLSB resistance in staphylococcal isolates (2, 5, 6, 13, 15). In addition, other mechanisms conferring resistance to macrolides and not lincosamides, such as efflux mechanisms encoded by msrA, are not uncommon (4) and may be increasing in frequency (15, 18). A significant number of erythromycin-resistant staphylococcal isolates may show true clindamycin susceptibility. In our clinical laboratory, of 617 erythromycin-resistant S. aureus isolates obtained over a 12-month period (in 2002), 310 (50%) were clindamycin susceptible, with no indication of inducible resistance by disk induction testing as described in this report; of 624 erythromycin-resistant CNS isolates, 206 (33%) were clindamycin susceptible. Therefore, the broad assumption of clindamycin resistance based on erythromycin resistance and the elimination of clindamycin as a potential therapeutic agent for up to 50% of erythromycin-resistant staphylococcal infections are problematic.
Clindamycin is a useful drug in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections and serious infections caused by staphylococcal species, as well as anaerobes. It has excellent tissue penetration (except for the central nervous system) and accumulates in abscesses, and no renal dosing adjustments are needed (7). Good oral absorption makes it an important option in outpatient therapy or as follow-up after intravenous therapy. Clindamycin is also of particular importance as an alternative antibiotic in the penicillin-allergic patient.
Accurate susceptibility data are important for appropriate therapy decisions. In staphylococci, in vitro susceptibility testing for clindamycin may indicate false susceptibility by the broth microdilution method and by disk diffusion testing with erythromycin and clindamycin disks in nonadjacent positions. However, if inducible resistance can be reliably detected on a routine basis in clinically significant isolates, clindamycin can be safely and effectively used in those patients with true clindamycin-susceptible strains. In this study, we have described a simple, reliable method to detect inducible resistance to clindamycin in erythromycin-resistant isolates of S. aureus and CNS.
Acknowledgments
We thank Rosemary Paxson and the University Hospital Microbiology Laboratory medical technologists for assistance in collecting clinical isolates and F. C. Tenover and J. Sutcliffe for kindly providing reference strains. We also thank Chong Cho for his advice and assistance.
1. Catchpole, I., and K. G. H. Dyke. 1990. A Staphylococcus aureus plasmid that specifies constitutive macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance contains a novel deletion in the ermC attenuator. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 69:43-48. [PubMed]
2. Di Modugno, V., M. Guerrini, S. Shah, and J. Hamilton-Miller. 2002. Low level resistance to oleandomycin as a marker of ermA in staphylococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:423-430. [PubMed]
3. Drinkovic, D., E. R. Fuller, K. P. Shore, D. J. Holland, and R. Ellis-Pegler. 2001. Clindamycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48:315-316. [PubMed]
4. Eady, E. A., J. I. Ross, J. L. Tipper, C. E. Walters, J. H. Cove, and W. C. Noble. 1993. Distribution of genes encoding erythromycin ribosomal methylases and an erythromycin efflux pump in epidemiologically distinct groups of staphylococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 31:211-217. [PubMed]
5. Frank, A. L., J. F. Marcinak, P. D. Mahgat, J. T. Tjhio, S. Kelkar, P. C. Schreckenberger, and J. P. Quinn. 2002. Clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 21:530-534. [PubMed]
6. Jenssen, W. D., S. Thakker-Varia, D. T. Dubin, and M. P. Weinstein. 1987. Prevalence of macrolides-lincosamides-streptogramin B resistance and erm gene classes among clinical strains of staphylococci and streptococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:883-888. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Kasten, M. J. 1999. Clindamycin, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol. Mayo Clin. Proc. 74:825-833. [PubMed]
8. Khan, S. A., M. S. Nawaz, A. A. Khan, and C. E. Cerniglia. 1999. Simultaneous detection of erythromycin-resistant methylase genes ermA and ermC from Staphylococcus spp. by multiplex-PCR. Mol. Cell. Probes 13:381-387. [PubMed]
9. Ligozzi, M., C. Bernini, M. G. Bonora, M. de Fatima, J. Zuliani, and R. Fontana. 2002. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of medically relevant gram-positive cocci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1681-1686. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Lina, G., A. Quaglia, M. E. Reverdy, R. Leclercq, F. Vandenesch, and J. Etienne. 1999. Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins among staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1062-1066. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. McGehee, R. F., F. F. Barrett, and F. Finland. 1969. Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to lincomycin, clinimycin, and erythromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1968:392-397. [PubMed]
12. NCCLS. 2003. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A8. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
13. Nicola, F. G., L. K. McDougal, J. W. Biddle, and F. C. Tenover. 1998. Characterization of erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus recovered in the United States from 1958 through 1969. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:3024-3027. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Panagea, S., J. D. Perry, and F. K. Gould. 1999. Should clindamycin be used in treatment of patients with infections caused by erythromycin-resistant staphylococci? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44:581-582. [PubMed]
15. Roberts, M. C., J. Sutcliffe, P. Courvalin, L. B. Jensen, J. Rood, and H. Seppala. 1999. Nomenclature for macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2823-2830. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Ross, J. I., E. A. Eady, J. H. Cove, W. J. Cunliffe, S. Baumberg, and J. C. Wootton. 1990. Inducible erythromycin resistance in staphylococci is encoded by a member of the ATP-binding transport super-gene family. Mol. Microbiol. 4:1207-1214. [PubMed]
17. Ross, J. I., A. M. Farrell, E. A. Eady, J. H. Cove, and W. J. Cunliffe. 1989. Characterisation and molecular cloning of the novel macrolide-streptogramin B resistance determinant from Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 24:851-862. [PubMed]
18. Sanchez, M. L., K. K. Flint, and R. N. Jones. 1993. Occurrence of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin resistances among staphylococcal clinical isolates at a university medical center. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16:205-213. [PubMed]
19. Schmitz, F. J., J. Petridou, A. C. Fluit, U. Hadding, G. Peters, and C. von Eiff. 2000. Distribution of macrolide-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus blood-culture isolates from fifteen German university hospitals. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:385-387. [PubMed]
20. Thakker-Varia, S., W. D. Jenssen, L. Moon-McDermott, M. P. Weinstein, and D. T. Dubin. 1987. Molecular epidemiology of macrolides-lincosamides-streptogramin B resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:735-743. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Tuazon, C. U., and J. N. Sheagren. 1975. Relapse of staphylococcal endocarditis after clindamycin therapy. Am. J. Med. Sci. 269:145-148. [PubMed]
22. Watanakunakorn, C. 1976. Clindamycin therapy of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Clinical relapse and development of resistance to clindamycin, lincomycin and erythromycin. Am. J. Med. 60:419-425. [PubMed]
23. Weisblum, B., and V. Demohn. 1969. Erythromycin-inducible resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: survey of antibiotic classes involved. J. Bacteriol. 98:447-452. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Werckenthin, C., S. Schwarz, and H. Westh. 1999. Structural alterations in the translational attenuator of constitutively expressed ermC genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1681-1685. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)