Previously, the human enzyme was expressed in sf9 insect cells using a baculovirus expression vector (
46), and in COS-1 cells transfected with human kynureninase cDNA (
47). Until now, its expression has not been reported using a bacterial expression system. The K
m values, and specific activity for 3-hydroxykynurenine that have been reported for the constitutive forms of kynureninase range from 3 μM (
46) to 49 μM (
47), and 0.16 μmol min
-1 mg
-1 from sf9 cells (
46) to 5.5 μmol min
-1 mg
-1 for the enzyme expressed in COS-1 cells (
46), respectively. The Michaelis constant (K
m = 28.3 μM), and specific activity (1.75 μmol min
-1 mg
-1) of our enzyme for 3-hydroxykynurenine agree best with that for enzyme expressed in COS-1 cells (
46). We find this to be a good indicator that the expression of the human enzyme in a bacterial system is functionally comparable to that from a eukaryotic expression system. We also determined the K
m of the human enzyme for the bacterial substrate, L-kynurenine, to be 493 ± 46 μM. This agrees well with that reported for the human enzyme expressed in COS-1 (
46) cells. All of our data were fit with HYPERO (
48), Prism (GraphPad), and EnzFitter (Biosoft), and found to exhibit classical Michaelis-Menten behavior, which also contrasts with reports of sigmoid kinetic behavior from the enzyme expressed in sf9 cells (
47). Attempts to fit our data to a Hill equation were unsuccessful. We measured the kinetic properties of a pseudo-native enzyme (with the hexa-histidine tag proteolitically removed) and found no change in K
m and only a slight loss of activity (less than 3%). This enzyme had classic Michaelis-Menten behavior as well.
Like other members of the PLP-dependent α-family, kynureninase appears to undergo conformational changes during catalysis. In this work we identify two regions in the small and large domains that could play a role in opening and closing the active site cavity: the small domain S20-S21 β-hairpin, and the large domain S15-S16
loop. The S20-S21 β-hairpin in particular emerges as a dynamic region since a structural superposition between Hkyn and the structures of Pkyn (PDB ID 1qz9), 2-aminoethylphosphonate transaminase (PDB ID 1m32) (
49), NifS (PDB ID 1jf9) (
50), cystathionine beta-lyase (PDB ID 1ibj) (
51), CsdB (PDB ID 1i29) (
52), alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase (PDB ID 1h0c) (
53), histidinol phosphate aminotransferase (PDB ID 1fg3) (
54), malY (PDB ID 1d2f) (
55), serine hydroxymethyltransferase (PDB ID 1bj4) (
56), and 3-hydroxykynurenine transaminase (PDB ID 2ch2) (
57) reveals that the difference in the S20-S21 β-hairpin conformational states observed between kynureninases is also clearly visible with other members of the α-family (). Based on the structural superposition, it appears that the conformation of the conserved Arg-434 in Hkyn is a function of the positioning of the small domain, in particular that of the S20-S21 β-hairpin. Furthermore, the conformational changes required to position the Hkyn S20-S21 β-hairpin, Arg-434, and small domain elements closer to active site residues (thus resembling the structures of 1qz9) would be very similar to the movements observed between aspartate aminotransferase open (PDB ID 1ama) (
58) and closed (PDB ID 9aat) (
59) states. Although the small domains of kynureninases and aspartate aminotransferases do not superimpose well, in part due to a difference in length between the small-large domain linker α-helix (32 residues in aspartate aminotransferase versus 21 residues in kynureninase), the relative motion that must be undertaken by the entire small domain is very similar between the AAT open/closed and Pkyn/Hkyn pairs (). Even though the small domain movements in aspartate aminotransferase are much more pronounced, it is possible that neither the Pkyn or Hkyn structures demonstrate a fully closed/open state, but rather an intermediate between them. Thus, the investigation of new kynureninase conformational states presents an interesting avenue of research. It is also possible that the second crystal morphology of kynureninase crystals grown in solution A might contain this different conformational state. It is important to note that these conditions would require some optimization in order to produce crystals with desirable diffraction properties.
The two kynureninase structures taken together suggest that the Arg
Hkyn434/Arg
Pkyn375 side chain is dynamic near the vicinity of the PLP aldimine bond. This conserved residue plays an important role in the substrate binding and catalysis of other PLP β-family members. Site directed mutagenesis studies with aspartate aminotransferase and serine hydroxymethyltransferase have shown that this residue is important for both substrate specificity and regulating the conformational changes that accompany substrate binding in these enzymes. Arginine to lysine mutants of serine hydroxymethyltransferase have a 15-fold reduction in affinity and 0.03% of the wild type catalytic activity (
60). Arginine to alanine mutants do not bind substrate or have catalytic activity (
61). Also, aspartate aminotransferase arginine to aspartate mutants have catalytic properties that are several orders of magnitude slower than wild type (
23). The structural superposition between these kynureninase orthologs also suggests that it is reasonable to presume that Arg-434 is involved in substrate binding as well. Human kynureninase crystals shatter within seconds of exposure to a mother solution containing 100 μM 3-hydroxy-DL-kynurenine. Thus, we speculate that substrate binding causes a conformational change that breaks crystal contacts and causes these crystals to shatter. This conformational change is likely to be initiated by an interaction between the substrate’s α carboxyl group and the Arg-434 guanidino nitrogens, as is seen in aspartate aminotransferase (
62). This is an important step in the closure mechanism since aspartate aminotransferase arginine to alanine mutants cannot adopt fully closed conformational states (
62). Subsequently, the aromatic ring of the substrate can occupy an amphiphilic pocket near the PLP-phosphate moiety between the charged side chains of Ser-75, His-102*, Tyr-275, Asn-333* and the hydrophobic side chains of Ile-110*, Phe-306*, Phe-314*, and Trp-305* (). Substrate binding within the active site would tether the S20-21 β-hairpin, and consequently the rest of the small domain, to the large domain through the side chain of Arg-434 and stabilize the closed state until product release. The binding of substrate to both small and large domain residues would place a certain amount of strain on substrate bonds which would be released as the substrate is cleaved. In this way the large and small domains act as a spring loaded catalytic unit that puts strain on the substrate bonds and facilitates hydrolysis. The docking of 3-hydroxy-L-kynurenine in the kynureninase active site reveals that substrate α-carboxylate oxygens are likely to form hydrogen bonds with the side chain of Arg-434. The docking also suggests that the 2-amino and 3-hydroxyl moieties of the substrate are likely to be within hydrogen bonding distance to atoms on Asn-333*, Ser-75, and His-102*, and in a favorable distal quadrupole π-π stacking interaction with the side chain of the conserved Trp-305*. Several atoms in the kynureninase-3-hydroxy-L-kynurenine docking solution occupy the positions of atoms on a PEG molecule found in the active site of 1qz9 (not shown). The Moldock docking algorithm positions the α nitrogen of 3-hydroxy-L-kynurenine in close proximity to the PLP-Lys-276 Schiff base aldimine as required to form the 3-hydroxy-L-kynurenine external aldimine, which is the first intermediate in the kynureninase catalytic mechanism (
63). 3-Hydroxy-L-kynurenine is also properly oriented such that the α carbon can be properly protonated by Lys-276 (
21) in subsequent catalytic steps to form the appropriate product enantiomer (L-alanine). Also, the position of the top scoring docking pose from our calculations is oriented within the active site in a similar fashion to that of 4-(2-aminophenyl)-4-oxobutanoic acid in the crystal structure of
A. gambiae 3-hydroxykynurenine transaminase (PDB ID 2ch2) (
57) (
superimposed figure in supplementary material). In both cases, α carboxylate atoms are near small domain residues, whereas the hydrophobic ring moiety is anchored on the large domain side of the active site cavity.
Inducible kynureninases preferentially catalyze the hydrolytic cleavage of kynurenine, which is not hydroxylated at the 3′ position. On the other hand, constitutive orthologs preferentially utilize 3-hydroxykynurenine as a substrate. Currently, there is a poor understanding of the molecular basis of the discrimination process between these two very similar molecules. The problem is further complicated by the fact that these enzymes have active sites that are highly conserved. Many of these conserved residues are found near the pyridoxal-5′-phosphate cofactor and there are currently no substrate or inhibitor kynureninase complex crystal structures to help identify residues involved in substrate differentiation. It is thus difficult to predict with certainty which residues convey molecular specificity. However, a structural superposition of the docked Hkyn-3-hydroxy-L-kynurenine structure with Pkyn, reveals contacts that can aid in directing experiments to identify these residues (). Specifically, the TrpPkyn69* side chain phenyl group and the γ carbon of ThrPkyn282* form a hydrophobic patch unfavorable for hydrogen bonding with the 3-hydroxyl moiety of 3-hydroxykynurenine. These groups are more suitable to accommodate the kynurenine 3′ methyne carbon. On the other hand, the δ nitrogen of AsnHkyn333* and the smaller HisHkyn102* side chains form an environment in human kynureninase that would allow for this group (3-hydroxyl) to interact favorably with their side chains and not be sterically hindered (by Trp-69* in Pkyn). Interestingly, these two point mutations are conserved among constitutive and inducible kynureninases, with inducible kynureninases having a Thr-Trp pair whereas constitutive orthologs contain the Asn-His pair. Based on these deductions, we have designed site-directed mutagenesis experiments to determine whether these residues play a role in substrate binding and specificity.