PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Biochemistry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 August 13.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2515554
NIHMSID: NIHMS61024

pH-Dependent Lytic Peptides Discovered by Phage-Display

Abstract

Lipid membranes compartmentalize eukaryotic cells and separate the cell interior from the extracellular milieu. So far, studies of peptide and protein interactions with membranes have largely been limited to naturally occurring peptides or to sequences designed on the basis of structural information and biophysical parameters. To expand on these studies, utilizing a system with minimal assumptions, we used phage-display technology to identify 12 amino-acid-long peptides that bind to liposomes at pH 5.0 but not at pH 7.5. Of the nineteen peptides discovered three were able to cause leakage of liposome contents. Multivalent presentation of these membrane-active peptides by conjugation onto poly(L-Lysine) enhanced their lytic potential.

Secondary structures were analyzed by circular dichroism in aqueous 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol and in buffered aqueous solutions, in both the presence and absence of liposomes. Two of the three lytic peptides show alpha helical profiles whereas none of the non-lytic peptides formed stable secondary structures.

The diverse characteristics of the peptides identified in this study demonstrate that phage-displayed peptide library screens on lipid membranes result in the discovery of non-classical membrane-active peptides, whose study will provide novel insights into peptide-membrane interactions.

Membranes play an integral role in biology by acting as compartmentalizing barriers and are involved in many biological processes such as signaling (1), membrane trafficking (2) including endo- and exocytosis (3), and viral cell entry and propagation (4).

Much of our understanding of protein-membrane interactions has been gained from studying the interaction of viral fusion proteins with membranes (5). The study of the interaction of fusion peptides of enveloped viruses with membranes proved to be particularly fruitful (6). The knowledge gained by these studies has greatly increased our understanding of not only the role of these fusion peptides in membrane fusion but yielded important insights into the interaction of peptides with membranes in general. Furthermore, these studies allowed for the harnessing peptides for improved delivery of genetic material and membrane impermeable drugs into the cell cytoplasm (7).

Despite the large number of membrane-active peptides known, no apparent consensus sequence or motif exists that governs membrane activity (8). Mechanistically, membrane disturbance can range from surface or interfacial effects such as the “carpet” model (9, 10) membrane insertion (11), membrane fusion, pore formation, or membrane rupture. For each of these mechanisms the structure and length requirements may be different. Until now, regions of both cellular and viral proteins as well as peptides that interact with membranes have been discovered predominantly by deletion and substitution studies (12), by homology (13), by photolabeling studies (14) and by biophysical analyses (15-17).

A more encompassing approach is an experimental one aimed at identifying peptides without being constrained by current paradigms. In this study, we achieve the identification of lytic peptides with minimal a priori assumptions. By using a phage-display peptide library screen (18) for peptides with membrane affinity, we circumvent structural or sequence restrictions used in rational peptide design (19, 20) and avoid the limitations imposed by combinatorial chemistry (21). To test the concept, we have chosen to identify peptides that are lytic in a pH-dependent fashion. An understanding of pH-dependent lytic behavior will help us to understand better processes such as endosomal escape of viruses and gene delivery vehicles into the cytoplasm. The knowledge gained by these studies opens the possibility to develop methods in interfering with this step in the infectious pathway of pathological viruses. Furthermore, the insights gained will pave the way to increase endosomal escape of non-viral gene delivery vehicles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

The Ph.D.-12 Phage-display Peptide Library Kit was purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). All lipids were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). C-terminally amidated peptides were either purchased as crude powder from Research Genetics (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with the exception of INF7*, which was purchased from Anaspec (San Jose, CA), or synthesized using the FastMocTM chemistry with Fmoc-Rink amide MBHA resin1 (Anaspec, San Jose, CA) on an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) 431A peptide synthesizer using the protocol of Fisher et al (22). Cleavage from the resin and deprotection was accomplished with a mixture of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) : phenol: water: thioanisol: 1,2-ethanedithiol (EDT): triisopropylsilane (TIPS) = 77.5: 5: 5: 5: 2.5: 5. Peptide synthesis grade reagents were purchased from Applied Biosystems, and resin and protected amino acids were purchased from Anaspec (San Jose, CA).

Poly(L-Lysine) hydrobromide (pLLys) was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), catalog number P2636, Mw = 30~70 kDa. N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate (SPDP) was purchased from Aldrich. Calcein (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was used without further purification. All other chemicals were of reagent grade unless otherwise noted.

Preparation of Multilamellar Vesicles (MLV) for Library Screen

Multilamellar vesicles were prepared from either 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl phosphatidylcholine (POPC) or from a mixture of lipids representing the endosomal membrane (endosomal lipid mix: ELM) (23). The endosomal lipid mix consists of liver PC: liver PE: brain PS: brain SM: cholesterol: liver PI: porcine brain ganglioside = 5: 1: 1: 1: 3: 1: 1. 1.5 μmol of lipid was dried into a film under argon, and residual solvents were removed under high vacuum for an hour. The lipid film was then dispersed in 500 μl pH 5 buffer (25 mM citric acid, 25 mM Na2HPO4, 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 5 with sodium hydroxide) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Mediatech, Herndon, VA). The serum was added in the buffer to mimic cell culture conditions. After vortexing for 4 minutes, the MLVs were collected by centrifugation for 4 minutes at 20,800 × g at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and the MLVs were resuspended in 500 μl 10% FBS in pH 5 buffer for immediate use in screening experiments.

Screening Procedure

The screen was conducted as follows: 2.4×1011 plaque-forming units (PFU) were diluted with pH 5 buffer with 10% FBS, which was added to prevent unspecific binding. To remove any traces of potential phage aggregates, the phage solution was centrifuged for 4 minutes at 20,800 × g at 4°C. The supernatant was added to the MLVs to a final volume of 1 ml. After incubation for 15 min at 37°C, with occasional shaking, those phages that bound to MLVs were harvested by collecting the MLVs by centrifugation for 4 minutes at 20,800 × g at 4°C. The supernatant was removed by aspiration, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of 10% FBS in pH 5 buffer. This washing procedure at pH 5 was repeated ten times. After the final centrifugation, the MLV/phage pellet was resuspended in 1 ml 10% FBS in pH 7.5 buffer (pH 7.5 buffer: 25 mM citric acid, 25 mM Na2HPO4, 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.5 with sodium hydroxide). Following a 15 min incubation at 37°C, the phages that bound MLVs at pH 5, but were released from MLVs at pH 7.5, were harvested by removing the MLVs by centrifugation (10 min, 20,800 × g, 4°C). This supernatant was transferred into a fresh tube for amplification. The amplification and titering steps were performed as described by the manufacturer. After four rounds of screening, the phages were harvested and plaques were picked for sequencing (Department of Human Genetics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine) using the primers provided in the kit.

Peptide Purification

The crude peptides were analyzed and purified on a Gilson HPLC system using reverse phase Vydac Protein and Peptide C18 analytical and semi-preparative columns (Grace Vydac, Hesperia, CA). The aqueous mobile phase consisted of 0.1% TFA or ammonium acetate in MilliQ water and the organic phase of 0.1% TFA or ammonium acetate in HPLC grade acetonitrile. The identity of the peptide was confirmed by MALDI-TOF (Rockefeller University, Protein DNA Technology Center, New York, NY).

Conjugation of Peptide onto Poly(L-Lysine)

Peptides were conjugated onto SPDP activated poly(L-Lysine) (pLLys) using a method described by Erbacher et al. (24). The fractions containing activated pLLys were then pooled and dialyzed against water. Activated pLLys was purified by gel permeation chromatography on a 1.25 cm × 45 cm Sephadex G25 column equilibrated in 0.15 M sodium chloride. The concentration of pLLys was determined by ninhydrin assay (45), and the grade of modification was measured by thiopyridone release at 343 nm after incubation with excess DTT.

Activated pLLys in one tenth the total reaction volume (2.2 ml) was added dropwise to peptides dissolved in 5 × final reaction buffer (2 M guanidine hydrochloric acid, 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate), layered with argon, and rotated at room temperature overnight. The extent of reaction was analyzed by thiopyridone absorbance.

The peptide-pLLys conjugate was diluted 4-fold with 25 mM HEPES sodium hydroxide pH 7.4 and purified by ion-exchange chromatography on a 1 ml HiPrep S column (equilibrated in 25 mM HEPES sodium hydroxide pH 7.4, 0.5 M guanidine hydrochloric acid) using a linear gradient to 3 M guanidine hydrochloric acid. Elution profiles were monitored by ninhydrin assay (45). After dialysis against 25 mM HEPES-sodium hydroxide pH 7.4, 150 mM sodium chloride, the final concentration of pLLys-peptide conjugate was determined by ninhydrin assay (45). The final peptide concentration was determined by analytical HPLC after treatment with DTT and ninhydrin assay (45).

Analysis of Peptide Binding to Multilamellar Liposomes

250 μM of synthetic peptide was incubated with 2.5 mM MLVs of one of two lipid compositions, in a total volume of 100 μl in either pH 5 or 7.5 buffer with 1 mM DTT. After incubation for 30 minutes at 37°C, peptide bound to liposomes was pelleted by centrifugation for 4°C for 10 minutes at 20,800 × g followed by two washes with 200 μl of the respective chilled buffer. The pellets were dissolved in TFE and applied onto a thin layer chromatography plate (Silica Gel 60 F254, EMD Chemicals, Inc. Darmstadt, Germany). Peptide and lipids were resolved by thin layer chromatography with the mobile phase (1-butanol : acetic acid : water = 5:2:3). Peptides were visualized by ninhydrin spraying (1 mg/ml ninhydrin in water-saturated n-butanol) and heating for color development.

Measurement of Leakage of Liposome Content

Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) were prepared by extrusion using a Liposofast hand-held extruder ((25), Avestin, Ottawa, Canada) with 100 nm pore-sized polycarbonate filters (Avestin). Briefly, 25 μmol of lipid and 1 μCi of L-1,2-dipalmitoyl, 3-phosphatidyl [N-methyl-3H] choline (3H-DPPC, Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) in chloroform was dried into a film as described above. Liposomes for contents-leakage assays were prepared by hydrating the above film in 500 μl of calcein solution (40 mM calcein in pH 7.5 buffer) by vortexing. The lipid dispersion was then either sonicated to make SUVs (two-times-5 minutes continuous sonication at setting 10 with a Sonicator XL, Misonix, Farmingdale, NY) or extruded to make LUVs as described above. Free calcein was removed from liposomes by floatation on an Accudenz (Accurate Chemical & Scientific Corporation, Westbury, NY) density gradient. All Accudenz solutions are w/v in pH 7.5 buffer. 100 μl liposome solution was mixed with 100 μl 40% Accudenz and introduced into 5 × 41 mm ultra-Clear ultracentrifuge tubes (Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA). This solution was then overlaid in succession with 150 μl 10%, 150 μl 5%, and 100 μl 0% Accudenz for POPC liposomes and 150 μl 15%, 150 μl 12.5%, 37.5 μl 10%, and 100 μl 5% Accudenz for ELM liposomes. Liposomes were centrifuged for 4 hours at 4°C at 48,000 RPM with deceleration set at 5 on the Beckman L8-M ultracentrifuge in an SW55Ti swinging bucket rotor. Calcein-loaded liposomes were isolated from the 5% and 0% interface. Lipid concentration was monitored by the amount of tritiated DPPC (Wallac 1409, Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA; CytoScint, ICN, Costa Mesa, CA). Alternatively, liposomes can be purified by repeated spin-column chromatography using Sephadex G25.

Calcein Leakage Assay

As originally described by Duzgunes et al. (26), contents leakage was measured by calcein release from the liposomes. Peptide stocks were made in DMF and borate buffer pH 8.4 mixtures to allow for complete dissolution of all peptides. Peptide concentrations were determined by a ninhydrin assay (27). Lipid concentrations were 25 μM unless otherwise noted. Final concentrations of stock components for leakage experiments were 1% DMF and 1.2 mM borate respectively. Assays were conducted in 96 well plates (Nunc white polysorb plates, Nalgene Nunc International, Rochester, NY), and calcein fluorescence was followed in a fluorescence plate reader (fmax, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Excitation and emission wavelengths were set to 485 nm and 538 nm respectively. Fluorescence was measured in 1 minute intervals with an integration time of 100 msec using SoftMax Pro 1.3.2 software. The reaction time was 30 min at 37°C, after which complete leakage was determined by the addition of Triton X100 to a final concentration of 0.2%.

Calculation Method

Percent leakage and leakage units were calculated as defined by Plank et al. (28).

Calcein Leakage in Presence of pLLys-peptide Conjugates

Calcein leakage studies conducted with peptide-pLLys conjugates were normalized for peptide concentration as determined above, with and without 1 mM DTT.

Circular Dichroism

Peptide conformation was studied by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy using a JASCO J-810 CD spectrometer with a 1 mm path length quartz cuvette (Hellma QS 284, Hellma U.S.A., Plainview, NY). All spectra are averages of four measurements taken between 250 to 190 nm at 25±2°C, unless noted otherwise.

Peptide stock solutions were prepared in trifluroethanol (TFE). Measurements were performed in TFE : water = 1:1 with 1 mM TCEP. The pH of these solutions was 3.0. For measurements of peptides in aqueous solution, peptides were dissolved in 0.1% ammonia, from which dilutions were made. Final CD buffer was 0.01% ammonia, 2 mM citrate, 2 mM borate, 2 mM potassium phosphate buffered, with 10 mM sodium chloride and 10 mM TCEP. The buffering components were used to adjust the solutions to either pH 5 or 7.5. If present, liposomes (SUVs), made as described above, were added to the peptide solution in less than 10% of the total volume. Peptide concentrations were derived from amino acid analysis (Rockefeller University Protein DNA Technology Center, New York, NY). Percent alpha helix was calculated taking the molar ellipticity at 222 nm with -32 × 103 deg·cm2·dmol-1 defined as 100% (29).

Bioinformatics Analysis

The probability that a peptide sequence occurred by chance, and positional amino acid frequencies were calculated using algorithms in RELIC: INFO and AAFREQ (which was modified so peptide redundancies were allowed) (30). The unamplified Ph.D.-12 library sequences were obtained from http://relic.bio.anl.gov/relicPeptides.aspx (file ran-12s.txt). Normalized amino acid occurrences for Fig. 4 were calculated with this data; namely, the frequency of a residue found in our phage screen divided by that of the parent library. The probability that amino acid X occurs at position y by chance in n out of N picked phage clones was calculated as follows:

equation M1

where FPh.D.-12 (X at y) is the frequency of X at position y found in the unamplified Ph.D.-12 library.

Fig. 4
Amino Acid Occurrence in Discovered Peptides

BLAST searches were done on NCBI BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) for short nearly exact matches. Significant motifs were not found within the discovered peptides according to MEME·MAST (http://meme.sdsc.edu/meme/website/intro.html) (31).

RESULTS

Phage Screen and Identified Peptides

All viruses have to breach a cellular membrane to access to the cytoplasm. Inevitably, this requires the interaction of viral proteins with cellular membranes. These interactions can either occur at the plasma membrane (e.g., HIV (32)) or in the endosomal system (e.g., influenza (33) and adenovirus (34)). Conformational changes of both class I and class II fusion proteins of enveloped viruses (35) play an essential role in fusion of the viral and cellular membranes. It has been recognized early on that pH-dependent interaction of fusion peptides with lipid bilayers are an important part of merging of membranes (12, 36, 37). That pH-dependent membrane interactions are also vital in endosomal escape of non-enveloped viruses is demonstrated by the pH-dependent insertion of the capsid protein of rhinoviruses into the endosomal membrane (38). Because of our interest in finding regions of other non-enveloped viruses involved in endosome escape, we set out to identify peptides that act on membranes in a pH-dependent manner.

While different mechanisms can be envisaged that results in such pH-dependency, we reasoned that one possible basis for pH-dependent membrane activity is the ability of peptides to bind to membranes only at acidic but not at neutral pH. Thus, the screen was designed to identify peptides that bind to membranes at pH 5 but not at pH 7.5. Peptides with pH-dependent membrane binding properties were discovered by panning a phage-displayed peptide library against multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) at the two pH conditions. For our screening, the library Ph.D.-12 (NEB, Beverly, MA), which is composed of 2.7 × 109 random combinations of 12 amino acids, was used. The peptides in this library are linked by a GGGS spacer to the N-terminus of the minor coat protein pIII of the filamentous phage M-13. Specifically, the library of filamentous phage was incubated with MLVs at pH 5. Phages that bind stably to MLVs were then isolated by collecting the MLVs by centrifugation; non-binding phages remained in the supernatant. Those phages that did not bind firmly to MLVs at pH 7.5 were selected by eluting phages with pH 7.5 buffer at 37°C. This eluant was amplified to repeat the panning three more times (see Materials and Methods).

Two different lipid compositions were used in this screen to select for peptides that either interact with the aliphatic bilayer core (using electroneutral PC liposomes) or the polar headgroups of the endosomal membrane (using an acidic endosomal lipid mix (ELM) described in the literature (23)).

These experiments yielded nineteen distinct peptide sequences, which are listed in Table 1. Some peptides occurred multiple times after four rounds of panning. This is not a result of the incomplete sequence representation or the positional amino acid biases dictated by M13 phage biology of the parent Ph.D.-12 library (39), nor individual phage growth biases, as the number of occurrences in the screen does not correlate with the probabilities of the sequences to randomly occur in the parent library (Supplementary Table 1).

Table 1
Sequences of Peptides Identified after Four Rounds of Panninga

In Vitro Characterization of Peptides

Overall, eleven short peptides were characterized for their ability to interact with and disturb membranes. Of the discovered peptides, all of the peptides recovered from the POPC MLV screen and the three peptides that occurred more than once in the ELM MLV screen were used. As positive controls for membrane activity two peptides were chosen that are known to be membrane-active in a pH-dependent manner (Table 1). INF7 is the first 23 amino acids of the amino-terminal sequence of influenza virus X-31 (H3N2) hemagglutinin subunit HA-2 with two G to E substitutions (positions 4 and 7) that render the peptide more membrane-active in in vitro assays (28). The other peptide is a 15-mer known as short fusion peptide 3 (SFP3) (40). This amphipathic peptide is a shortened version of the synthetic pH-sensitive peptide GALA (41), which has been described in detail for its membrane activity in vitro (20). In addition to the relevant amino acid sequences, a cysteine was added to the C-terminus of each peptide (except SFP3, which already has a C-terminal cysteine). Each peptide is named after the screen from which it was recovered. INF7 with the C-terminal Cysteine is now called INF7*. This additional cysteine allowed the conjugation of the peptides to poly-lysine for multimeric presentation as discussed later. The C-termini were amidated.

MLV Binding of Free Peptides

The 13-mer peptides were first tested for whether they retained the ability to bind to liposomes on which the screen was based. To demonstrate peptide association with MLVs individual peptides were incubated with POPC or ELM MLVs under the same pH conditions as for the phage screen. After centrifugation, peptides and lipids in the pellet were separated by thin layer chromatography and the peptides visualized by ninhydrin spray. For optimal recovery and detection 250 μM peptide and 2.5 mM lipid was used. The peptides ELM1, ELM2, ELM3, PC3, PC5, and PC6 were, in contrast to PC1, PC2 and PC4, not detectable in the pellet of POPC MLVs (Table 2 and data not shown). For technical reasons it was not possible to measure the binding of PC2 and PC4 to ELM MLVs. Of the remaining peptides, however, only PC1 could bind to ELM MLVs (Table 2). PC4 pelleted also in the absence of MLVs in a pH-independent manner, although to a lesser degree than in their presence, suggesting that PC4 has a tendency to aggregate under these conditions (data not shown).

Table 2
Peptide Binding to Multilamellar Vescicles (MLVs)a

Contents Leakage Assay

To analyze the lytic potential of our peptides the ability of these peptides to induce leakage of vesicle contents of large unilamellar liposomes (LUVs) was tested. To measure liposome leakage a well-established contents leakage assay (26) was used. In this assay, the fluorophore calcein is entrapped in the liposomes at self-quenching concentrations; when released into the surrounding buffer, quenching is relieved resulting in increased fluorescence. A typical calcein release curve during incubation of 25 μM PC1 peptide with POPC LUVs at 37°C can be seen in Fig. 1. As expected, due to substrate (i.e., non-lysed, calcein filled liposomes) depletion, the leakage curve was biphasic. At pH 5 the initial release rate was 4.2% leakage/min and the extent of leakage at 30 minutes was 34.5%. At pH 7.5, on the other hand, leakage was negligible.

Fig. 1
Lytic Activity of PC1

To determine the relative leakage activity of each peptide, contents leakage was determined at peptide concentrations from 0 to 75 μM (except for PC4, for which the highest concentration was 8.3 μM due to peptide aggregation at higher concentrations). Whereas the peptide concentrations were varied as a three-fold dilution series, the lipid concentration was kept constant at 25 μM. The titration curves for all the peptides analyzed by this method are shown in Fig. 2. To summarize the leakage data from various concentrations of all peptides, their activity was represented in leakage units as defined previously by Plank et al. (Table 3) (28). Leakage units are defined as the inverse of the amount of peptide (expressed in μg) necessary to result in ≥50% leakage after 30 minutes (28). In effect, leakage units represent a molar leakage coefficient corrected for peptide length.

Fig. 2
Extent of pH-dependent Leakage of All Peptides
Table 3
Summary of Leakage Activity of All Peptidesa

As anticipated, some peptides PC1, PC2, and PC4 — namely those which bound to MLVs—as well as the two positive control peptides SFP3 and INF7* demonstrate membrane activity with greater leakage at pH 5 than at pH 7.5 (Fig. 2 and Table 3). The other peptides analyzed do not show any activity under these conditions (data not shown). The leakage triggered by INF7* is comparable to the results reported by Plank et al. (28) (Table 3). PC4 is almost as active as INF7* while PC2 is approximately 3-fold less active. The leakage activities of SFP3 and PC1 at pH 5 are more than one order of magnitude lower than the activity of INF7* (Table 3 and Fig. 2). For certain peptides and pH conditions it was not possible to calculate leakage units because 50% leakage was not reached in the concentration range tested. For two of these conditions, namely PC1 and SFP3 at pH 7.5, leakage was negligible. For the third condition, PC4 at pH 7.5, leakage measured at the highest peptide concentration without detectable peptide aggregation reached 27% (Fig. 2), approximately 3-fold lower than leakage observed at pH 5.

The pH dependence is strongest for PC1, SPF3 and INF7*. The leakage observed with INF7* was approximately 15-times higher at pH 5 than at pH 7.5 (Table 3 and Fig. 2). The difference in leakage activity at pH 5 and pH 7.5 for PC2 is 3-fold (Table 3). Leakage for PC1 and SFP3 at pH 7.5 was negligible even at the highest concentrations tested (Fig. 2). Similar results were obtained with calcein-loaded ELM liposomes.

Oligomeric Presentation of Peptides

Since most fusion or lytic peptides of enveloped and non-enveloped viruses are presented as part of a protein, often in multimeric form (42), we tested the effect of oligomeric presentation of the membrane-active peptides PC1, PC2, and PC4. Using SPDP chemistry, peptides were coupled to poly (L-Lysine) (pLLys) (Mw = 30~70 kDa) via a disulfide bond from their C-terminal cysteines to modified ε-amino groups of the lysines. With this procedure 16.6+/-1.7% of all lysines were carrying a peptide. Conjugates were then incubated with POPC liposomes in the presence or absence of DTT. In other words, peptides were either released from pLLys by reduction of the disulfide bridge in the presence of DTT, or remained conjugated in the absence of DTT. Analysis in the leakage assay showed that the conjugated form of PC1 was significantly more lytic than the reduced free peptide form (Fig. 3) at both pH 5 and pH 7.5. Despite the same trend, this effect was less pronounced for PC2-pLLys conjugates, and no activity could be observed for PC4-pLLys conjugates (data not shown). The reason for this behavior of PC2 and PC4 is not known at present, but the formation of aggregates might play a role in the case of PC4; PC2, on the other hand, is negatively charged and it is reasonable to assume that the positively charged pLLys may influence its leakage activity by neutralizing these charges and modulating the local pH. Poly (L-Lysine) alone does not result in leakage of calcein from POPC LUVs (data not shown).

Fig. 3
Effect of Oligomeric Presentation on pH-dependent Contents Leakage from Liposomes

Amino Acid Composition

When studying the peptide sequences (Table 1) for their amino acid compositions two trends are immediately apparent: the great number of prolines and the differences in amino acid composition reflective of the MLV lipid composition (Fig. 4). Those peptides arising from screens against acidic ELM MLVs show a particularly high preponderance of histidines and a concurrent paucity of aromatic and hydrophobic amino acid residues, with the exception of methionine. The sequences arising from phage screened against electroneutral POPC MLVs, on the other hand, are highly aromatic.

To understand more quantitatively the peptide profile of the POPC screen, which yielded the membrane-active peptides, the frequency of amino acid occurrence was compared against its counterpart-frequencies in the parent Ph.D-12 library (Frig. 4). This analysis was weighted for peptide occurrence, i.e. the amino acid composition of each peptide sequence was multiplied with the frequency of occurrence of the clone. In the POPC MLV screen, from which the active peptides were identified, the aromatic amino acids are highly enriched (Tyr 1.6 x, Phe 2.6 x, Trp 4.8x enrichment above the parent library frequency). Not surprisingly, all titratable amino acids were enriched (aspartate 1.5x; glutamate 1.6x histidine 1.8x).

When comparing the individual sequences from the membrane active peptides PC1, PC2 and PC4 to the non-active peptides PC3, PC5 and PC6, discovered in the screen using POPC MLVs, it is striking that none of the active peptides have either an arginine or a lysine in their sequence. In contrast, tryptophan is highly enriched in the sequence of two of the three active peptides but completely absent from the inactive peptides. Among the active peptides, the sequences are quite distinct in their amino acid composition. The sequence of PC2 is dominated by aliphatics (33% not counting the C-terminal Cysteine) in addition to a partially aliphatic methionine and a phenylalanine. These hydrophobic amino acids and the two acidic glutamates arranged in a periodic manner are features reminiscent of helical viral fusion peptides. PC1, on the other hand, has three titratable amino acids and has 2.8 x higher contents of aromatic amino acids and a 7.4 x higher contents of tryptophan than the parent library. The most intriguing sequence is the sequence of PC4. This peptide displays strongly pH-dependent lytic activity despite the lack of any titratable amino acids. Furthermore, all of its amino acids are overrepresented when compared to the parent library. Strikingly, tryptophan occurs 11.1 x more often than by random chance.

It is tempting to speculate that the sequence diversity of the active peptides will be reflected in different mechanisms of membrane activity. In particular PC4, lacking any titratable groups, promises to provide novel insights in how peptides can induce pH-dependent permeabilization of liposomes.

Peptide Structure

Secondary structures are known to be important in peptide-membrane interactions. Amphipathic helices are seen in many lytic (43) and fusion peptides (12). Conversely, beta sheets can act on membranes (44) as beta aggregates (45, 46), or they can insert into membrane as beta barrels (47). We therefore analyzed the secondary structure of our peptides by circular dichroism. We first chose TFE as a co-solvent because it serves as a model for the hydrophobic environment of the aliphatic core of membranes. In 50% TFE and in the concentration range tested (50~400 μM), SFP3 - a peptide designed to maximize its helical content and hydrophobic moment (41) - shows an α-helical spectra with minima at 208 nm and 222 nm and small contributions from random coil or possibly a 310 helix (48) (Fig. 5). Two of our peptides, PC2, and to a lesser extent PC4 also show profiles consistent with α-helical conformations. The above structures are present between 25-55°C (data not shown). The partially helical conformation PC4 suggested by its CD spectrum is surprising given the preponderance of prolines and tryptophans. CD spectra of peptides, however, can be greatly influenced by aromatic amino acids (49). Hence, it is possible that this apparent partially helical profile is artifactual. While PC1 shows pH-dependent lytic activity, notable structures were not observed under these solvent conditions. None of the other peptides showed any structure (data not shown).

Fig. 5
Secondary Structure of Peptides in TFE

To study the effect of pH and membranes on the structure of our peptides, we next determined the secondary structure of the three active peptides and the positive control SFP3 in aqueous buffered solutions of pH 5 and pH 7.5, both in the presence and absence of liposomes (Fig. 6). The signal-to-noise ratio could not be optimized to obtain spectra for PC1 and PC4 under the range of conditions tested. PC2 showed a more prominent alpha-helical conformation at pH 5 than at pH 7.5 where the spectra suggest a stronger influence of a typical random coil. Upon addition of POPC SUVs, the characteristic alpha-helical minima at 222 nm became more prominent, at both pH 5 and 7.5. SFP3 showed a similar pH-dependence with peptide alone: deeper 222 nm well minima at pH 5 than at pH 7.5. In contrast to PC2, the addition of liposomes at pH 7.5 did not result in increased helicity for SFP3 as reflected in calcein leakage results (Table 3). Only in the presence of liposomes did the 222 nm well minima become more pronounced at pH 5. These trends of SFP3 are consistent with studies of the parent peptide GALA in presence of lipids (41) and with its sister peptide SFP1 in aqueous solution without lipids (40).

Fig. 6
Effect of pH and Lipids on Peptide Structure

Taken together with results from Table 3, the apparent rank order of lytic potencies does not seem to correlate with helicity, suggesting that additional parameters are influencing the lytic potential of these peptides. Nevertheless, the fact that both the lowering of pH as well as the addition of lipid membranes increase the helical profile of PC2 suggests a role of this structure in the pH-dependent membrane activity of this peptide. Future experiments, including additional spectroscopic methods and mutational analyses, will be needed to unravel the mechanisms of pH-dependent membrane activity of the diverse peptides discovered in this study.

DISCUSSION

In this paper, we set out to discover peptides that disturb membranes in a pH-dependent manner by screening an M13 12-mer filamentous phage library, Ph.D.-12, for pH-dependent liposome binding. Two different liposome types were used: one that represents the aliphatic lipid bilayer core, POPC MLVs, and the second mimicking the endosomal membrane, ELM MLVs. In this context, we have identified 19 distinct peptide sequences, of which three peptides PC1, PC2, and PC4, are able to induce pH-dependent calcein leakage to a similar extent as that of the positive control peptides SFP3 and INF7* (Fig. 3).

In contrast to peptides identified from phage screens against receptors or antibodies (50), BLAST analysis showed that our panel of active peptides do not share significant homology with any proteins described. Instead, our peptides have varied sequences without an obvious consensus motif. This lack of a consensus sequence is unsurprising, since secondary (12) and multi-dimensional (44) homologies seem to be more important in defining membrane activity than their primary sequence.

On the amino acid level, compositions of the discovered peptides reflect the nature of the lipids against which the screen has been conducted, aromatic groups against isoelectric POPC liposomes, and basic and less hydrophobic residues against negatively charged ELM liposomes. We have also enriched for histidines, a titratable amino acid in the pH-range of the screen.

Against our expectations, aliphatic amino acids (with the exception of PC2) have not been enriched in our screens. Aromatics, on the other hand, were highly enriched in our POPC screen. Two of the membrane-active peptides — namely PC1 and PC4 — have a striking number of tryptophans. In contrast, trypthophan occurred only once in the 13 sequences discovered in the ELM screen and was completely absent from all the inactive peptides isolated from the POPC screen (Table 1).

When peptide activity was determined in vitro using the calcein leakage assay (26), we found that PC1, PC2 and PC4 were active both on electroneutral POPC as well as negatively charged ELM liposomes. These results imply that the calcein leakage activity of peptides is not dependent on ionic interaction with the lipid headgroups, but is instead governed by the ability of the peptides to interact with the hydrophobic core of the lipid bilayer.

For PC1 and PC4, it is likely that the multiple tryptophans play an important role in this putative interfacial insertion into the bilayer. According to the Wimley-White interfacial hydrophobicity scale (51), aromatic and hydrophobic aliphatic residues (with the exception of valine) favor partitioning into a lipid bilayer (Fig. 4). Tryptophan not only favors partitioning into bilayers more than aliphatics, but it is — unlike, for example, leucine — energetically undesirable to be located in the center of a transmembrane domain (16, 52). The enrichment of tryptophans in the membrane-proximal domain has been implicated in the membrane fusogenic activity of viral fusion proteins (53). The reason for the partial bilayer insertion of PC2, on the other hand, probably lies in its tendency to form an amphipathic helix as seen in classical viral fusion peptides (54). In a helical conformation, the acidic glutamates and the hydrophobic amino acids (leucine, isoleucine and methionine) of PC2 lie on opposite faces of the helix.

Another factor that can influence both membrane activity of peptides as well as the angle of peptide insertion into membranes is peptide length. Peptide length is often cited as a reason for diminished membrane activity of shorter peptides. While there are 6-mers (55) that have been shown to be membrane-active and 8 amino acid peptides are reported to interact stably with membranes (56), the membrane-active peptides studied in most detail are helices of a length of approximately 20 amino acids. One particularly well-studied peptide is the N-terminus of the influenza fusion protein hemagglutinin. In this model, using a host-guest system, increased peptide length increases both the depth and angle of membrane insertion as well contents leakage from red blood cells (57). Given this information, it is remarkable that the 13 amino-acid-long peptides in our study enable contents leakage to a similar extent as the 24 amino-acid-long influenza fusion peptide analog INF7* (Table 3), which has been optimized for its lytic activity (28).

Together these results suggest that the propensity of the membrane-active peptides to insert shallowly into the membrane is important for their lytic activity. The ability to penetrate deep into the hydrophobic core, on the other hand, may be less significant. The data are indeed consistent with a model in which a shallow interaction with the hydrophobic core of a bilayer is sufficient to induce content leakage.

Most membrane-interacting synthetic peptides are more active as dimers (58, 59) and oligomers (60) or when anchored to a membrane (40). This principle also holds true for two of our leakage active peptides, PC2 and especially PC1 (Fig. 3). PC1 conjugated to poly(L-Lysine) by disulfide bonds, a multimeric presentation, is considerably more active in the calcein leakage assay than when the peptide was released from the oligomer in presence of 1 mM DTT.

As stated in the introduction, membrane binding is obligatory, though not necessarily sufficient, for a peptide to be membrane-active. True to this prediction, peptides identified in our screen that lost the ability to bind stably to membranes are not lytic. The fact that in the context of the phage the peptides are both C-terminally anchored to a protein as well as being displayed in a pentameric form likely influences their ability to interact with membranes. Especially, because oligomeric presentation of the peptides almost certainly increases avidity, it is not surprising that some peptides — PC3, PC5 and PC6 as well as ELM1, ELM2 and ELM3 — lost the ability to bind stably to liposomes in their monomeric form.

PC1 binds to both POPC and ELM liposomes. This is not unexpected since, as stated above, the interaction of PC1 with membranes is less likely to be influenced by the surface charge, but more likely by insertion of the peptide into the aliphatic core of the bilayer. Interestingly, the membrane-active peptides PC1, PC2 and PC4 bind to MLVs at both pHs. This appears to conflict both with the phage screen, which was based on the elution of the phages at pH 7.5, as well as the calcein leakage results. The simplest explanation for this behavior lies in the different natures of the liposome-binding assay and the phage screen and calcein leakage assay. In the phage screen, the eluted phages are amplified in each round of screening. Even if only a small amount of bound phage is eluted at pH 7.5, the bulk of the phage remaining bound to MLVs, it will be amplified and thus recovered in the screen. The liposome-binding assay, on the other hand, measures binding of the bulk of peptides.

Despite the pH-independent binding of the peptides to MLVs, the lytic activity of all active peptides is strongly pH-dependent. Apparently, the lytic activity of our peptides is influenced by additional factors — such as pH-dependent structural changes — not just binding to liposomes. Alternatively, the reason for the difference between binding and lytic activity might lie in the different peptide and lipid concentrations used in the two assays. Because of the detection limit in the liposome binding assay, both the lipid and the peptide concentrations were substantially higher in the binding than in the leakage assay.

The secondary structure of peptides has been instrumental in further understanding the interaction peptides with membranes. Many of the membrane-interacting components of viruses form amphipathic helices (12). In line with these observations, we find that two of our peptides, PC2 and PC4, despite their short length, show helical propensities in 50% TFE (Fig. 5); although taking into account PC4′s highly aromatic amino acid composition, the “helical” structure must be confirmed by other methods (49). The helicity of PC2 in aqueous solution shows a pH- and lipid-dependent increase, reminiscent of the conformational change and the resulting deeper membrane insertion of influenza fusion domain in acidic pH (61). Thus, a model in which this change in helicity plays a role in the lytic activity of PC2 is particularly attractive.

The fact that PC4 tends to aggregate in solution might also play an important role in the leakage potential of this peptide. Interestingly, aggregation of PC4 in solution was not strongly dependent on pH, in contrast to the pH-dependent leakage induced by PC4. This disparity suggests that differences exist in peptide organization in the absence or presence of membranes. These results are consistent with other studies showing that peptide assembly on membrane templates and aggregation has an important role in membrane activity (57, 59).

PC4 is of further interest because it possesses pH-dependent lytic activity in the absence of any titratable groups. One possible reason for the pH-dependency of PC4 is the presence of two prolines. Prolines can confer pH sensitivity by isomerizing in a pH-dependent manner (62). The possible importance of prolines for the pH-dependent lytic activity of PC4 is highlighted by the fact that the probability of the double prolines at position 9 and 10 to occur by random chance in our screen is less than 10-7 (see Materials and Methods). This indicates that these prolines are a result of the selective pressure in this screen for pH-dependent phage binding to the membranes. These findings resonate with the fact that centrally located prolines (63), and their ability to change between secondary structures (55, 64, 65), play an integral role in pH-dependent membrane destabilization induced by other peptides.

Our work demonstrates that peptides that are membrane-active in a pH-dependent fashion can be identified by phage-display. The study also demonstrates that the choice of lipids used in the screen is important in selecting for activity. When the screen is performed with electroneutral PC liposomes that mimic the aliphatic core, 50% of the sequences discovered on the screen produced pH-dependent lytic peptides. Furthermore, membrane-active peptides — as opposed to their inactive counterparts — contain a remarkably high content of tryptophan, reminiscent of antimicrobial peptides (66), suggesting a crucial role of this amino acid in the lytic behavior of these peptides.

Future studies aimed at deciphering the mechanism of membrane activity will help us to put these newly identified peptides into the context of both naturally occurring, as well as synthetic lytic peptides. The present approach may also open new avenues to gain a deeper understanding of peptide-lipid interactions and their role in cell biological and pathological processes, with the potential of yielding new strategies for therapeutic applications.

Supplementary Material

si20060227_052

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to acknowledge the expert technical assistance of C. Cruickshank during the initial phase of this project. We would also like to thank J. Carlson, A. Kentsis and the Department of Structural Biology at Mount Sinai School of Medicine for their assistance in the use of the JASCO J-810 CD spectrometer and K. Senn, L. Gigout, R. Fransis, M. Linden, A. Thomas, and R. Brasseur for insightful discussions.

Abbreviations

CD
circular dichroism
ELM
endosomal lipid mix
EDT
1,2-ethanedithiol
FBS
fetal bovine serum
LUV
large unilamellar vesicles
MBHA resin
(4-(2′,4′-dimethoxyphenyl-Fmoc-aminomethyl-phenoxyacetamido-norleucyl)-4-methylbenzhydrylamine) resin
MLV
multilamellar Vesicles
POPC
1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl phosphatidylcholine
PBS
phosphate buffered saline
PC
phosphatidylcholine
PE
phosphatidylethanolamine
PI
phosphatidylinositol
3H-DPPC
L-3-1,2-dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl [N-methyl-3H] choline
PS
phosphatidylserine
pLLys
poly(L-Lysine) hydrobromide
SUVs
small unilamellar vesicles
SM
sphingomyelin
SPDP
N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate
2-TP
2-thiopyridone
TCEP
tri(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride
TFA
trifluoroacetic acid
TFE
2,2,2-trifluoroethanol
TIPS
triisopropylsilane
TX100
Triton X-100

Footnotes

This work was supported by a Basil O’Connor starter scholar research award from the March of Dimes Birth Defect Foundation (5-FY00-530, to T.W.) and a grant from the National Institute of Health (GM066313, to T.W.)

REFERENCES

(1) Cho W, Stahelin RV. Membrane-protein interactions in cell signaling and membrane trafficking. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2005;34:119–51. [PubMed]
(2) Holthuis JC, Levine TP. Lipid traffic: floppy drives and a superhighway. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:209–20. [PubMed]
(3) Pelchen-Matthews A, Raposo G, Marsh M. Endosomes, exosomes and Trojan viruses. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12:310–6. [PubMed]
(4) Byland R, Marsh M. Trafficking of viral membrane proteins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2005;285:219–54. [PubMed]
(5) Tamm LK, Crane J, Kiessling V. Membrane fusion: a structural perspective on the interplay of lipids and proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003;13:453–66. [PubMed]
(6) Pecheur EI, Sainte-Marie J, Bienven e A, Hoekstra D. Peptides and membrane fusion: towards an understanding of the molecular mechanism of protein-induced fusion. J Membr Biol. 1999;167:1–17. [PubMed]
(7) Simoes S, Slepushkin V, Gaspar R, de Lima MC, Duzgunes N. Gene delivery by negatively charged ternary complexes of DNA, cationic liposomes and transferrin or fusigenic peptides. Gene Ther. 1998;5:955–64. [PubMed]
(8) Martin I, Ruysschaert JM. Common properties of fusion peptides from diverse systems. Biosci Rep. 2000;20:483–500. [PubMed]
(9) Pouny Y, Rapaport D, Mor A, Nicolas P, Shai Y. Interaction of antimicrobial dermaseptin and its fluorescently labeled analogues with phospholipid membranes. Biochemistry. 1992;31:12416–23. [PubMed]
(10) Shai Y. Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid bilayer membranes by alpha-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1462:55–70. [PubMed]
(11) Rafalski M, Ortiz A, Rockwell A, van Ginkel LC, Lear JD, DeGrado WF, Wilschut J. Membrane fusion activity of the influenza virus hemagglutinin: interaction of HA2 N-terminal peptides with phospholipid vesicles. Biochemistry. 1991;30:10211–20. [PubMed]
(12) Epand RM. Fusion peptides and the mechanism of viral fusion. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1614:116–21. [PubMed]
(13) Del Angel VD, Dupuis F, Mornon JP, Callebaut I. Viral fusion peptides and identification of membrane-interacting segments. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;293:1153–60. [PubMed]
(14) Brunner J, Tsururud . Fusion-Protein Membrane Interactions as Studied by Hydrophobic Photolabeling. In: Bentz J, editor. Viral fusion mechanisms. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1993. pp. 67–88.
(15) Hristova K, White SH. An Experiment-Based Algorithm for Predicting the Partitioning of Unfolded Peptides into Phosphatidylcholine Bilayer Interfaces. Biochemistry. 2005 [PubMed]
(16) Hessa T, Kim H, Bihlmaier K, Lundin C, Boekel J, Andersson H, Nilsson I, White SH, von Heijne G. Recognition of transmembrane helices by the endoplasmic reticulum translocon. Nature. 2005;433:377–81. [PubMed]
(17) Lins L, Charloteaux B, Heinen C, Thomas A, Brasseur R. “De novo” design of peptides with specific lipid-binding properties. Biophys J. 2006;90:470–9. [PubMed]
(18) Szardenings M. Phage display of random peptide libraries: applications, limits, and potential. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2003;23:307–49. [PubMed]
(19) Wimley WC, White SH. Designing transmembrane alpha-helices that insert spontaneously. Biochemistry. 2000;39:4432–42. [PubMed]
(20) Li W, Nicol F, Szoka FC., Jr. GALA: a designed synthetic pH-responsive amphipathic peptide with applications in drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:967–85. [PubMed]
(21) Hong SY, Oh JE, Kwon M, Choi MJ, Lee JH, Lee BL, Moon HM, Lee KH. Identification and characterization of novel antimicrobial decapeptides generated by combinatorial chemistry. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2534–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(22) Fisher LE, Engelman DM. High-yield synthesis and purification of an alpha-helical transmembrane domain. Anal Biochem. 2001;293:102–8. [PubMed]
(23) Di Simone C, Zandonatti MA, Buchmeier MJ. Acidic pH triggers LCMV membrane fusion activity and conformational change in the glycoprotein spike. Virology. 1994;198:455–65. [PubMed]
(24) Erbacher P, Remy JS, Behr JP. Gene transfer with synthetic virus-like particles via the integrin-mediated endocytosis pathway. Gene Ther. 1999;6:138–45. [PubMed]
(25) MacDonald RC, Macdonald RI, Menco BPM, Takeshita K, Subbarao NK, Hu L-R. Small-volume extrusion apparatus for preparation of large, unilamellar vesicles. Biochimica et Biophpysica Acta. 1991;1061:297–303. [PubMed]
(26) Duzgunes N, Straubinger RM, Baldwin PA, Friend DS, Papahadjopoulos D. Proton-induced fusion of oleic acid-phosphatidylethanolamine liposomes. Biochemistry. 1985;24:3091–8. [PubMed]
(27) Moore S, Stein WH. A modified Ninhydrin reagent for the photometric determination of amino acids and related compounds. J Biol Chem. 1954;211:907–913. [PubMed]
(28) Plank C, Oberhauser B, Mechtler K, Koch C, Wagner E. The influence of endosome-disruptive peptides on gene transfer using synthetic virus-like gene transfer systems. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:12918–24. [PubMed]
(29) Johnson WC., Jr. Protein secondary structure and circular dichroism: a practical guide. Proteins. 1990;7:205–14. [PubMed]
(30) Mandava S, Makowski L, Devarapalli S, Uzubell J, Rodi DJ. RELIC--a bioinformatics server for combinatorial peptide analysis and identification of protein-ligand interaction sites. Proteomics. 2004;4:1439–60. [PubMed]
(31) Bailey TL, Gribskov M. Combining evidence using p-values: application to sequence homology searches. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:48–54. [PubMed]
(32) Stein BS, Gowda SD, Lifson JD, Penhallow RC, Bensch KG, Engleman EG. pH-independent HIV entry into CD4-positive T cells via virus envelope fusion to the plasma membrane. Cell. 1987;49:659–68. [PubMed]
(33) Stegmann T, Morselt HW, Scholma J, Wilschut J. Fusion of influenza virus in an intracellular acidic compartment measured by fluorescence dequenching. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987;904:165–70. [PubMed]
(34) Wiethoff CM, Wodrich H, Gerace L, Nemerow GR. Adenovirus protein VI mediates membrane disruption following capsid disassembly. J Virol. 2005;79:1992–2000. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(35) Jardetzky TS, Lamb RA. Virology: a class act. Nature. 2004;427:307–8. [PubMed]
(36) Duzgunes N, Gambale F. Membrane action of synthetic N-terminal peptides of influenza virus hemagglutinin and its mutants. FEBS Lett. 1988;227:110–4. [PubMed]
(37) Schlegel R, Wade M. A synthetic peptide corresponding to the NH2 terminus of vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein is a pH-dependent hemolysin. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:4691–4. [PubMed]
(38) Hewat EA, Blaas D. Cryoelectron microscopy analysis of the structural changes associated with human rhinovirus type 14 uncoating. J Virol. 2004;78:2935–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(39) Rodi DJ, Soares AS, Makowski L. Quantitative assessment of peptide sequence diversity in M13 combinatorial peptide phage display libraries. J Mol Biol. 2002;322:1039–52. [PubMed]
(40) Puyal C, Maurin L, Miquel G, Bienvenue A, Philippot J. Design of a short membrane-destabilizing peptide covalently bound to liposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1195:259–66. [PubMed]
(41) Subbarao NK, Parente RA, Szoka FC, Jr., Nadasdi L, Pongracz K. pH-dependent bilayer destabilization by an amphipathic peptide. Biochemistry. 1987;26:2964–72. [PubMed]
(42) Hernandez LD, Hoffman LR, Wolfsberg TG, White JM. Virus-cell and cell-cell fusion. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:627–61. [PubMed]
(43) Zelezetsky I, Pacor S, Pag U, Papo N, Shai Y, Sahl HG, Tossi A. Controlled alteration of the shape and conformational stability of alpha-helical cell-lytic peptides: effect on mode of action and cell specificity. Biochem J. 2005 [PubMed]
(44) Rausch JM, Marks JR, Wimley WC. Rational combinatorial design of pore-forming {beta}-sheet peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:10511–5. [PubMed]
(45) Kremer JJ, Pallitto MM, Sklansky DJ, Murphy RM. Correlation of beta-amyloid aggregate size and hydrophobicity with decreased bilayer fluidity of model membranes. Biochemistry. 2000;39:10309–18. [PubMed]
(46) Bokvist M, Lindstrom F, Watts A, Grobner G. Two types of Alzheimer’s beta-amyloid (1-40) peptide membrane interactions: aggregation preventing transmembrane anchoring versus accelerated surface fibril formation. J Mol Biol. 2004;335:1039–49. [PubMed]
(47) Wimley WC. The versatile beta-barrel membrane protein. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003;13:404–11. [PubMed]
(48) Biron Z, Khare S, Samson AO, Hayek Y, Naider F, Anglister J. A monomeric 3(10)-helix is formed in water by a 13-residue peptide representing the neutralizing determinant of HIV-1 on gp41. Biochemistry. 2002;41:12687–96. [PubMed]
(49) Vuilleumier S, Sancho J, Loewenthal R, Fersht AR. Circular dichroism studies of barnase and its mutants: characterization of the contribution of aromatic side chains. Biochemistry. 1993;32:10303–13. [PubMed]
(50) Beckmann C, Brittnacher M, Ernst R, Mayer-Hamblett N, Miller SI, Burns JL. Use of phage display to identify potential Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene products relevant to early cystic fibrosis airway infections. Infect Immun. 2005;73:444–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(51) Wimley WC, White SH. Experimentally determined hydrophobicity scale for proteins at membrane interfaces. Nat Struct Biol. 1996;3:842–8. [PubMed]
(52) Kamimori H, Blazyk J, Aguilar MI. Lipid membrane-binding properties of tryptophan analogues of linear amphipathic beta-sheet cationic antimicrobial peptides using surface plasmon resonance. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28:148–50. [PubMed]
(53) Sainz B, Jr., Rausch JM, Gallaher WR, Garry RF, Wimley WC. The aromatic domain of the coronavirus class I viral fusion protein induces membrane permeabilization: putative role during viral entry. Biochemistry. 2005;44:947–58. [PubMed]
(54) Takahashi S. Conformation of membrane fusion-active 20-residue peptides with or without lipid bilayers. Implication of alpha-helix formation for membrane fusion. Biochemistry. 1990;29:6257–64. [PubMed]
(55) Pecheur EI, Martin I, Bienvenue A, Ruysschaert JM, Hoekstra D. Protein-induced fusion can be modulated by target membrane lipids through a structural switch at the level of the fusion peptide. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:3936–42. [PubMed]
(56) McLean LR, Hagaman KA, Owen TJ, Krstenansky JL. Minimal peptide length for interaction of amphipathic alpha-helical peptides with phosphatidylcholine liposomes. Biochemistry. 1991;30:31–7. [PubMed]
(57) Han X, Tamm LK. A host-guest system to study structure-function relationships of membrane fusion peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:13097–102. [PubMed]
(58) Kovacs F, Quine J, Cross TA. Validation of the single-stranded channel conformation of gramicidin A by solid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:7910–5. [PubMed]
(59) Haas DH, Murphy RM. Templated assembly of the pH-sensitive membrane-lytic peptide GALA. J Pept Res. 2004;63:451–9. [PubMed]
(60) Yang R, Prorok M, Castellino FJ, Weliky DP. A trimeric HIV-1 fusion peptide construct which does not self-associate in aqueous solution and which has 15-fold higher membrane fusion rate. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:14722–3. [PubMed]
(61) Han X, Bushweller JH, Cafiso DS, Tamm LK. Membrane structure and fusion-triggering conformational change of the fusion domain from influenza hemagglutinin. Nat Struct Biol. 2001;8:715–20. [PubMed]
(62) Brasseur R, Cabiaux V, Falmagne P, Ruysschaert JM. pH dependent insertion of a diphtheria toxin B fragment peptide into the lipid membrane: a conformational analysis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1986;136:160–8. [PubMed]
(63) Afonin S, Durr UH, Glaser RW, Ulrich AS. ‘Boomerang’-like insertion of a fusogenic peptide in a lipid membrane revealed by solid-state 19F NMR. Magn Reson Chem. 2004;42:195–203. [PubMed]
(64) Delos SE, Gilbert JM, White JM. The central proline of an internal viral fusion peptide serves two important roles. J Virol. 2000;74:1686–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
(65) Hofmann MW, Weise K, Ollesch J, Agrawal P, Stalz H, Stelzer W, Hulsbergen F, de Groot H, Gerwert K, Reed J, Langosch D. De novo design of conformationally flexible transmembrane peptides driving membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:14776–81. [PubMed]
(66) Hsu CH, Chen C, Jou ML, Lee AY, Lin YC, Yu YP, Huang WT, Wu SH. Structural and DNA-binding studies on the bovine antimicrobial peptide, indolicidin: evidence for multiple conformations involved in binding to membranes and DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:4053–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]