Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of annrcseLink to Publisher's site
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 September; 84(5): 344–347.
PMCID: PMC2504180

Surgical experience and supervision may influence the quality of lower limb amputation.


AIM: Only half of those patients undergoing major lower limb amputations for peripheral vascular disease (PVD) are likely to mobilise on a prosthesis. This study aimed to determine whether a surgeon's experience influenced the quality of the residual limb and thus the likelihood of the stump being suitable for a prosthesis. METHODS: All patients undergoing major lower limb amputations for PVD were recruited prospectively, between August 1992 and July 1996. Following surgery, patients were categorised, by a consultant in rehabilitation medicine, as potentially suitable (group 1) or unsuitable (group II) for rehabilitation. Patients in group I were further assessed by prosthetists for limb fitting. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients underwent 260 amputations for PVD between 1992 and 1996: transfemoral (TFA) 131, trans-tibial (TTA) 127, and through-knee (TKA) in 2. The 30-day mortality was 12% (n = 27). Following surgery, 109 patients were assigned to group I (51%), and 81 patients to group II (37%). The proportion of junior surgeons performing surgery was similar for patients in both groups. Twenty-three amputation stumps (9%) required revision or conversion to a higher level within 30 days. Revisions or conversions were significantly more frequent where the original operation had been performed by an unsupervised junior surgeon rather than a senior surgeon (P = 0.009). The rate of defective amputations compromising limb fitting also reached significance when unsupervised junior and senior surgeons were compared (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation of the relatively few amputees who reach the stage of limb fitting is hindered by poor surgical technique in a large proportion of cases. Patients operated on by a more experienced surgeon had a better chance of mobilising without revision or conversion surgery.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (606K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Chakrabarty BK. Lower limb amputation: striking the balance. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 Mar;77(2):157–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • White SA, Thompson MM, Zickerman AM, Broomhead P, Critchley P, Barrie WW, Bell PR. Lower limb amputation and grade of surgeon. Br J Surg. 1997 Apr;84(4):509–511. [PubMed]
  • Pinzur MS, Gottschalk F, Smith D, Shanfield S, de Andrade R, Osterman H, Roberts JR, Orlando-Crombleholme P, Larsen J, Rappazzini P, et al. Functional outcome of below-knee amputation in peripheral vascular insufficiency. A multicenter review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):247–249. [PubMed]
  • Houghton AD, Taylor PR, Thurlow S, Rootes E, McColl I. Success rates for rehabilitation of vascular amputees: implications for preoperative assessment and amputation level. Br J Surg. 1992 Aug;79(8):753–755. [PubMed]
  • McWhinnie DL, Gordon AC, Collin J, Gray DW, Morrison JD. Rehabilitation outcome 5 years after 100 lower-limb amputations. Br J Surg. 1994 Nov;81(11):1596–1599. [PubMed]
  • De Luccia N, Pinto MA, Guedes JP, Albers MT. Rehabilitation after amputation for vascular disease: a follow-up study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1992 Aug;16(2):124–128. [PubMed]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England