PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of annrcseLink to Publisher's site
 
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 September; 82(5): 336–338.
PMCID: PMC2503602

The influence of experience and specialisation on the reliability of a common clinical sign.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the influence of experience and specialisation on clinical judgement by comparing accuracy in diagnosing anaemia between a consultant general surgeon, a consultant ophthalmologist and their registrars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Conjunctival inspection of 101 patients, subsequent correlation with haemoglobin concentration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of correct and incorrect diagnoses of anaemia. RESULTS: 54 patients were anaemic and 47 were not. Overall accuracy in diagnosing anaemia ranged from 0.61-0.69, sensitivity 0.52-0.65 and specificity 0.62-0.83. Agreements between pairs of examiners were 0.68-0.81, with kappa values of 0.36-0.60 when adjusted for chance agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Neither experience nor specialisation significantly influenced our ability to diagnose anaemia, based on conjunctival inspection. Without critical analysis of clinical signs, we are unaware of their diagnostic limitations.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (391K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed]
  • Gjørup T, Bugge PM, Hendriksen C, Jensen AM. A critical evaluation of the clinical diagnosis of anemia. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Oct;124(4):657–665. [PubMed]
  • Wurapa FK, Bulsara MK, Boatin BA. Evaluation of conjunctival pallor in the diagnosis of anaemia. J Trop Med Hyg. 1986 Feb;89(1):33–36. [PubMed]
  • Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Oct 2;293(14):695–701. [PubMed]
  • Ghosh S, Mohan M. Screening for anaemia. Lancet. 1978 Apr 15;1(8068):823–823. [PubMed]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England