Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of annrcseLink to Publisher's site
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 May; 82(3): 217–222.
PMCID: PMC2503436

The NHS patient information lottery: it is whom you see rather than what you need.


OBJECTIVE: To examine the current scale of provision of patient information materials by consultant surgeons in UK NHS and private sector hospitals. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the responses of 12,555 surgical patients to surveys evaluating surgical services provided by specific consultants. SETTING: 7 NHS Trusts and one private sector hospital distributed throughout the UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Provision of information materials by hospital, surgeon, and case-mix. Comparison of this service with patients' evaluations of surgeons' verbal communication in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Great variation exists between surgeons of the same specialty, and between hospital surgical directorates as a whole in the routine provision of supportive information materials to patients undergoing surgery. This variation cannot be explained solely by clinical need. Patients treated in private hospitals were less likely to receive information materials compared to patients treated within the NHS. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of printed information materials to patients by clinicians appears to be arbitrary. With the prospect of national performance frameworks in the foreseeable future, it is reasonable to assume that not only will the content of patient information be determined by quality standards but, in addition, its availability will be decided by clinical need rather than the clinician's preferences or interests.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (837K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Reiser SJ. The era of the patient. Using the experience of illness in shaping the missions of health care. JAMA. 1993 Feb 24;269(8):1012–1017. [PubMed]
  • Meredith P, Emberton M, Wood C, Smith J. Comparison of patients' needs for information on prostate surgery with printed materials provided by surgeons. Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):18–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Montgomery BS, Venn SN, Beard RC. Written information for transurethral resection of the prostate--a national audit. Br J Urol. 1995 Jan;75(1):9–11. [PubMed]
  • Bruster S, Jarman B, Bosanquet N, Weston D, Erens R, Delbanco TL. National survey of hospital patients. BMJ. 1994 Dec 10;309(6968):1542–1546. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):112–121. [PubMed]
  • Entwistle VA, Sheldon TA, Sowden A, Watt IS. Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Spring;14(2):212–225. [PubMed]
  • Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Disseminating information about healthcare effectiveness: a survey of consumer health information services. Qual Health Care. 1998 Sep;7(3):124–129. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England