Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of annrcseLink to Publisher's site
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 January; 74(1): 40–46.
PMCID: PMC2497469

How does computer-aided diagnosis improve the management of acute abdominal pain?


The introduction of standardised data-collection forms and computer-aided diagnosis has been found to be associated with improved diagnosis and management of patients with acute abdominal pain. The mechanism by which such benefits accrue has been the subject of some controversy. Detailed analysis of 5193 patients from one hospital shows that the major benefit from such diagnostic aids was the accurate early diagnosis of non-specific abdominal pain by senior house officers in the accident and emergency department; this in turn led to fewer admissions and fewer operations with negative findings. Clinical data about patients with acute abdominal pain should be recorded on structured information sheets by junior doctors and early positive diagnosis should be encouraged before decisions affecting the patient's management are made. Improved computer support may confer further benefits.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • de Dombal FT, Leaper DJ, Staniland JR, McCann AP, Horrocks JC. Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J. 1972 Apr 1;2(5804):9–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gunn AA. The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain with computer analysis. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1976 May;21(3):170–172. [PubMed]
  • Fenyö G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Sep;153(9):545–551. [PubMed]
  • McAdam WA, Brock BM, Armitage T, Davenport P, Chan M, de Dombal FT. Twelve years' experience of computer-aided diagnosis in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990 Mar;72(2):140–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Adams ID, Chan M, Clifford PC, Cooke WM, Dallos V, de Dombal FT, Edwards MH, Hancock DM, Hewett DJ, McIntyre N, et al. Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 27;293(6550):800–804. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Clifford PC, Chan M, Hewett DJ. The acute abdomen: management with microcomputer aid. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1986 Jul;68(4):182–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Oct 18;293(6553):1025–1026. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sutton GC. How accurate is computer-aided diagnosis? Lancet. 1989 Oct 14;2(8668):905–908. [PubMed]
  • Sutton GC. Computer-aided diagnosis: a review. Br J Surg. 1989 Jan;76(1):82–85. [PubMed]
  • White SJ, Freedman LS. Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical study. Br J Cancer. 1978 May;37(5):849–857. [PubMed]
  • Spiegelhalter DJ. Statistical methodology for evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol. 1985 Jul;14(3):489–515. [PubMed]
  • Seymour DG, Green M, Vaz FG. Making better decisions: construction of clinical scoring systems by the Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones approach. BMJ. 1990 Jan 27;300(6719):223–226. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England