Human cathepsin L is an endosomal cysteine protease that has been implicated in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes.1-3
Cathepsin L is widely distributed, and plays key roles in bone remodeling and the immune response, as well as in disease states such as cancer,4
Furthermore, a number of infectious agents (e.g., Ebola, SARS, and Leishmania) have been reported to require cathepsin L or cathepsin L-like activity for viral processing and infectivity.8-12
As such, the identification of inhibitors of cathepsin L would provide valuable tools to probe the role of this enzyme in biological systems, as well as to provide potential starting points for drug discovery efforts.
The Penn Center for Molecular Discovery (PCMD), a member of the Molecular Libraries Screening Center Network (MLSCN), has conducted a series of high throughput screening (HTS) campaigns of the Molecular Libraries Small Molecular Repository (MLSMR) to identify inhibitors of cysteine (cathepsins B,13
L, and S) and serine (cathepsin G, Factor XIa, and XIIa) proteases.14
This effort recently led to the identification15
, a novel and potent inhibitor of human cathepsin L ().17
Thiocarbazate cathepsin L inhibitor (−)-1.
Most cysteine protease inhibitors require the presence of an electrophilic warhead that provides a site of reaction (either reversible or irreversible) for the active site thiolate. Selectivity and potency are often dictated by the reactivity of the warhead in conjunction with additional binding interactions of the molecule across the enzyme active site. Classic warheads include epoxides, nitriles, activated carbonyls, vinyl sulfones, oxocarbazates, and aza-peptides.2,18-20
Indeed, incorporation of such warheads has led to cathepsin K and cathepsin S inhibitors currently in clinical trials.3
Potent inhibitors of cathepsin L that incorporate azepanones and cyanamides have also been described recently.21,22
To the best of our knowledge, thiocarbazates and their corresponding biological activity have not been described prior to our original report.15
Since the thiocarbazate core embodies the potential for broad utility as a cysteine protease inhibitor scaffold, we sought to understand further the requirements for activity within this substructure.
In an effort to evaluate the potential binding mode of (−)-1
with cathepsin L, we performed docking studies using the publicly available X-ray coordinates for papain complexed to a succinyl epoxide inhibitor (1cvz.pdb).23
The papain model was a relevant model for Cathepsin L due to the high degree of sequence homology between the binding sites of these two cysteine proteases. In these studies we observed the simultaneous occupation of the S2, S3 and S1′ subsites by hydrophobic and aromatic functionalities of thiocarbazate (−)-1
as shown in ; the indole side-chain occupies the S2 subsite, the -NHBoc group group the S3 subsite, and the 2-ethylphenyl aniline the S1′ subsite. A key hydrogen bond is observed between the Gly66 backbone NH and the amino acid derived carbonyl of the diacyl hydrazine. In other inhibitor systems, the absence of a hydrogen bonding interaction between Gly66 and inhibitor has been reported to lead to a loss of inhibition in numerous cathepsins, including cathepsin L.22
Details of the molecular docking studies are reported elsewhere,24
however they suggest that (a) the thiocarbazate carbonyl is in sufficient proximity to the active site Cys25 to permit nucleophilic thiolate addition; and (b) significant binding interactions (both hydrogen bonding and van der Waals) are present between the inhibitor and protease subsites. These observations supported our hypothesis that specific binding interactions as well as appropriate reactivity of (−)-1
are essential for the observed inhibitory properties.
Figure 2 Thiocarbazate (−)-1 (IC50 = 56 nM) in the binding subsite of papain. The indole forms hydrophobic contacts within the S2 subsite, the -NHBoc group forms hydrophobic contacts within the S3 subsite, and the 2-ethylphenyl anilide occupies the S1′ (more ...)
The docking studies were validated by the synthesis of analogs in which key residues occupying the S2, S3 and S1′ subsites were modified. Specifically, replacement of the indole side-chain, the NHBoc, and the 2-ethylphenyl anilide of (−)-1
were targeted. Thiocarbazates for this study were prepared from the requisite hydrazides exploiting our previously developed chemistry.15
In a one-pot reaction, hydrazides were treated with carbonyl sulfide gas followed by an appropriate electrophile (i.e., R2
-Br). Preparative reverse phase HPLC was employed to purify the final products,25
which were assayed for their ability to inhibit cathepsin L.26
As illustrated by the results listed in , occupation of the S2 subsite is essential for cathepsin L inhibition. Partial occupation, as in (−)-2 where the indole side chain is replaced with the smaller phenyl group, results in less potent activity (IC50 = 115 nM vs. 56 nM). Thiocarbazate 3, in which the entire indole side chain has been eliminated, exhibits no inhibition. Also pronounced are the -NHBoc group's contributions to potency, as illustrated by thiocarbazate 4's significantly reduced activity (IC50 = 22 μM). In this case, we reason that the loss of a key hydrogen bond between the NHBoc group and the Asp158 residue, leads to diminished activity. These results support the importance of maintaining hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions in the active site, consistent with the mode of docking proposed.
Synthesis and cathepsin L inhibitory activity of thiocarbazates.
From the docking studies of thiocarbazate (−)-1
we hypothesized that additional room for structural modifications and ring constraints was available in the anilide portion of this thiocarbazate (S1′ subsite). Based on this observation, a tetrahydroquinoline anilide (−)-5
was substituted for the 2-ethylphenyl anilide moiety ().27
An improvement in potency was observed (IC50
= 41 nM), further supporting our hypothesis. To explore this area further, two additional analogs were prepared: thiocarbazate 6
, in which constraints were imposed by incorporation of an N
-phenyl pyrrolidinone group, and a methyl ester thiocarbazate (−)-7
Both analogs 6
exhibited reduced activity against cathepsin L with IC50
values of 110 nM and 201 nM, respectively.
Our thiocarbazates are structurally related to oxocarbazates (e.g., A
) and aza-peptides (e.g., B
), known protease inhibitors ()30-32
that are active by the virtue of their activated carbonyl groups. Depending on the nature of the leaving group present, these inhibitors often bind and react with the active site serine or cysteine, resulting in the formation of a stable acyl-enzyme complex, which then undergoes slow hydrolysis.30,31
Alternatively, oxocarbazate and aza-peptide inhibitors, with poor leaving groups are believed to form stable tetrahedral intermediates without acyl enzyme adduct formation.18,33,34
To further understand the cathepsin L inhibitory activity of thiocarbazates, (−)-1
was incubated in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of cysteine or cathepsin L over prolonged time periods in the presence of assay buffer. The reaction was monitored by LC-MS for the disappearance of (−)-1
as well as the appearance of reaction products such as cysteine adducts and products of hydrolysis.35
In both experiments, thiocarbazate (−)-1
was found to remain unchanged after greater than 24 hours, and no evidence of newly formed reaction products were detected. As the formation of a stable acyl-enzyme complex would have resulted in the generation of a new product based on the leaving group embedded in (-)-1
, we hypothesize that a stable acyl-enzyme adduct is not formed. These data are consistent with detailed kinetic analysis16
is a slowly reversible inhibitor of Cathepsin L.
Examples of known oxocarbazate A and aza-peptide B inhibitors.
To probe the necessity of the thiocarbazate core in inhibitors such as (−)-1 and (-)-5, a series of analogs were prepared in which a carbon, oxygen, or nitrogen atom replaced of the sulfur atom. This series was designed to incorporate the preferred S1′ subsite substituent, the tetrahydroquinoline anilide. Toward this end, the corresponding diacyl hydrazine (−)-9, aza-peptide (−)-11, and oxocarbazate (−)-13 were prepared as illustrated in .
Synthesis of tetrahydroquinoline derived diacyl hydrazine (−)-9, aza-peptide (−)-11, and oxocarbazate (−)-13 analogs starting from Boc-l-Trp-NHNH2.
Diacyl hydrazine (−)-9
was prepared from succinanilic acid368
via an EDC mediated coupling reaction with Boc-l
. Aza-peptide (−)-11
was generated via the reaction of preformed isocyanate 10
was synthesized using a three-component protocol using Boc-l
, α-bromoanilide 12
, and carbon dioxide.38,39
While yields for these analogs were modest 33-65%, 1 mmol scale reactions yielded material of >99% purity for biological assay. When tested for inhibition of cathepsin L, diacyl hydrazine (−)-9
was found to be inactive and aza-peptide analog (−)-11
displayed only modest potency. In these cases, the presence of the preferred tetrahydroquinoline anilide could not compensate for the lack of an activated carbonyl [e.g., (-)-9
] or unoptimized carbonyl reactivity (e.g., (-)-11
]. In contrast, oxocarbazate (−)-13
, in which an oxygen atom was substituted for the sulfur atom of (−)-5
, was the most potent cathepsin L inhibitor identified within this study (IC50
= 7 nM).40,41
As in the case of (−)-1
, oxocarbazate (−)-13
and thiocarbazate (−)-5
were found to be unreactive to transesterification by cysteine and DTT nucleophiles. Furthermore, (-)-13
remained intact for greater than 24 hours when incubated with Cathepsin L under stoichiometric conditions, and in the presence of assay buffer.26
Electrostatic potential calculations were also conducted to determine the relative electrophilicities of the carbonyls within the tetrahydroquinoline substituted inhibitors; however the results from these studies gave no clear correlation between electrophilicity and activity, further supporting our hypothesis that both reactivity as well as binding interactions dictate potency.
In summary, through the design, synthesis and assay of a series of thiocarbazates we have characterized the activity of a novel family of cathepsin L inhibitors. Based on these studies we conclude that full occupancy of the S2, S3 and S1′ subsites is required for potent inhibition. With these requirements met, the activated carbonyl group is positioned in close proximity to the Cys25 active site residue. Although we observed no evidence of reaction between the protein and the inhibitors, changes in the functionality adjacent to the putative reactive carbonyl (i.e., sulfur, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen analogs) strongly influenced potency. In the course of these studies, we designed and synthesized a highly potent cathepsin L inhibitor, oxocarbazate (−)-13 that contains a preferred tetrahydroquinoline anilide group. Future efforts in our laboratory will focus on the thiocarbazate chemotype and its potential to exhibit broad cysteine protease inhibitory activity.