Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procbhomepageaboutsubmitalertseditorial board
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 July 22; 274(1619): 1763–1771.
Published online 2007 May 8. doi:  10.1098/rspb.2007.0338
PMCID: PMC2493580

Dispersal of introduced house sparrows Passer domesticus: an experiment


An important issue concerning the introduction of non-indigenous organisms into local populations is the potential of the introduced individuals to spread and interfere both demographically and genetically with the local population. Accordingly, the potential of spatial dispersal among introduced individuals compared with local individuals is a key parameter to understand the spatial and temporal dynamics of populations after an introduction event. In addition, if the variance in dispersal rate and distance is linked to individual characteristics, this may further affect the population dynamics. We conducted a large-scale experiment where we introduced 123 house sparrows from a distant population into 18 local populations without changing population density or sex ratio. Introduced individuals dispersed more frequently and over longer distances than residents. Furthermore, females had higher probability of dispersal than males. In females, there was also a positive relationship between the wing length and the probability of dispersal and dispersal distance. These results suggest that the distribution and frequency of introduced individuals may be predicted by their sex ratio as well as their phenotypic characteristics.

Keywords: invasive, ex situ conservation, morphological characters, movement pattern, reintroduction, transgenic organisms

1. Introduction

Owing to human activity, the introduction of alien species and individuals of deviant genotypes into wild populations is one of the major threats to global biodiversity (Lodge 1993; Clavero & Garcìa-Berthou 2005). Numerous examples are available where introduced individuals have established viable populations (e.g. Blackburn & Duncan 2001). In many cases, such introductions have led to changes in local population structure, which may have pronounced effects both ecologically (Tiedje et al. 1989; Simberloff et al. 2005) and economically (Born et al. 2005). Furthermore, if alien and native individuals interact reproductively, this may alter the genetic composition and lead to changes of locally co-adapted gene complexes or establishment of deleterious alleles (Lynch & Walsh 1998), which may influence the growth rate of the population (McGinnity et al. 2003). On the contrary, for a population or a species that balances on the brink of extinction, a supply of introduced individuals may rescue the population and even the species from extinction (Ebenhard 1995). Hence, introductions may be an important management tool in the conservation of threatened or vulnerable populations (Griffith et al. 1989; Hedrick 1995; Madsen et al. 1999).

An important consequence of introducing individuals into an area is that they will often spread into surrounding areas. Thus, identifying the factors that influence the rate and spatial scale of spread should be considered when evaluating the ecological consequences of introducing individuals into an area (Puth & Post 2005). For example, in two sympatric species of crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus and Austropotamobius pallipes), one resident and one invasive, the invasive species was shown to move substantially longer distances within the study area than the local species (Bubb et al. 2006). It has also been shown that relocated individuals of the tiger snake (Notechis scutatus) dispersed longer distances than the residents, although the frequency of movement was the same for both groups (Butler et al. 2005). These studies indicate that the spread of alien individuals may be faster than expected from theoretical models which only assume a linear rate of spread with time (Hastings 1996). The spatial scaling of movements, especially during the period just after an introduction episode, also varies substantially among species (Duncan et al. 1999, 2003). Thus, identifying the factors affecting the movement patterns during this period seems important for understanding the spread of introduced individuals into surrounding areas.

In vertebrates, there is now substantial empirical evidence that individual characteristics can explain a considerable proportion of the variation in both natal and breeding dispersal (Clobert et al. 2001; Aragòn et al. 2006). For instance, in birds, females generally disperse over larger distances than males (e.g. Greenwood & Harvey 1982; Clarke et al. 1997), whereas the reverse pattern is found in mammals (e.g. Dobson 1982). Furthermore, evidence from a variety of taxa also suggests that the dispersal distance is associated with individual phenotypic characteristics. For instance, individuals with higher flight metabolic rate showed more frequent dispersal in the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia; Haag et al. 2005). Similarly, other physiological traits, such as individual ability of the immune system to respond to novel antigens, have also been shown to be related to dispersal behaviour (Snoeijs et al. 2004).

Although many mechanisms that influence dispersal behaviour under natural conditions are known, few studies have experimentally examined the factors affecting the movement patterns of introduced individuals under natural conditions. In the present study, we intended to experimentally examine whether general dispersal patterns, as recorded in unmanipulated natural populations, can be applied to predict the dispersal pattern of individuals introduced into local populations. However, if introduced individuals have a more extensive dispersal behaviour, this may have important consequences both demographically and genetically, as well as for the management of introduction programmes (Puth & Post 2005).

We relocated alien individuals of house sparrows from a distant population at the island Vega, 95 km away, into a metapopulation consisting of 24 local house sparrow populations in the Vikna archipelago in northern Norway. Since the house sparrows in this area are exclusively associated with human settlements, we were able to cover a large study area with a high probability of detecting long-distance movements (Koenig et al. 1996; Clobert et al. 2001). In particular, we investigated whether the probability of dispersal and the dispersal distance differed between introduced and native individuals. Furthermore, we investigated whether variation in dispersal behaviour (i.e. probability of dispersal and dispersal distance) was related to individual sex or morphological characteristics. The analyses were performed using a model extending the gamma-binormal model, which is based on multisite capture–recapture data and accounts for the underlying continuous bivariate distribution of dispersal displacements, as proposed by Tufto et al. (2005). Using such a model is important because not accounting for unobserved long-distance dispersers may bias the results. In the current paper, we extend the model to also account for various phenotypic characteristics of the different individuals as covariates.

2. Material and methods

(a) Experimental design

We translocated house sparrows from the island Vega (66° N, 12° E; figure 1) into a metapopulation about 95 km south, which consisted of 244 individuals distributed among 24 local house sparrow populations in the Vikna archipelago (65° N, 11° E; figure 1) in northern Norway. The translocation experiment was conducted in February and March 2002.

Figure 1
Maps showing geographical locations of populations included in the introduction experiment of house sparrows in northern Norway. (a) The regional positions of the study areas in northern Norway and (b) the Vikna archipelago, where each local population ...

The study area at Vikna covers 360 km2 (figure 1) and consists of an agricultural landscape dominated by hills, lakes and fjords sparsely populated with dairy farms, where the house sparrows live within and around cattle sheds and barns. The mean distance between a farm and the nearest neighbouring farm was approximately 2 km.

In this experiment, we did not want to alter the original sex ratio or the absolute population sizes of the local populations at Vikna, thus avoiding the potential influence of changes in population structure on the movement patterns (see Sæther et al. 1999 and references therein). Initially, we captured all the individuals at Vikna, which were then kept with ad libitum food inside an abandoned barn. Eight individuals were observed, but not captured, at the start of the experiment. These individuals were accounted for in the estimation of population sizes and sex ratios, but were not included in the further analysis. Then, out of a total of 244 original individuals, we removed 50% of the females and 50% of the males from each of 18 out of the 24 farms in the Vikna archipelago. They were transported by car in special transport cages with a separate room for each individual bird to a distant location near the city Steinkjer (64° N, 11° E; figure 1), approximately 110 km to the southeast. None of these individuals later returned to Vikna. The same day, the remaining 50% of the Vikna individuals were replaced in their original farms. Some hours later, the bisected farm populations at Vikna were supplemented by the introduction of 123 individuals from the island of Vega (figure 1), and thus brought back to the original population sizes and sex ratios. These birds had been captured approximately two weeks ago on Vega, and kept with ad libitum food in a barn prior to being transported to Vikna by car. Thus, both resident individuals from Vikna and introduced birds from Vega were given the same experimental treatment.

We know from previous work (Krogstad et al. 1996) that house sparrows survive such treatments very well. Accordingly, only approximately 1% of the birds died during the experiment. The introduced birds from Vega did not differ significantly from the native birds at Vikna with respect to tarsus length (t-test, t=−0.285, d.f.=123.561, p>0.05). However, genotypes at 17 presumably neutral microsatellite loci sampled from the Vikna (n=49) and the Vega (n=48) populations before the experiment demonstrated an overall difference in allele frequencies between the two populations (Fisher's method: d.f. =34, p<0.001, Fst =0.017, Genepop v. 3.4; H. Jensen & R. Moe unpublished data), which implies genetic divergence.

A bird was classified as a disperser if, during the period from April to October 2002, it was recaptured or observed at a different farm compared with the farm it was released on at the start of the experiment.

(b) Measuring phenotypic traits

The house sparrows were caught by mist netting and marked with numbered aluminium rings and plastic colour rings of unique individual combination; in addition several morphological traits were measured (§2c). Individual body condition index was estimated as the unstandardized residual from a linear regression of body mass on tarsus length, where sex and the interaction between sex and body mass were included. We also collected a small blood sample from each bird the first time it was caught (see Ringsby et al. (2002) and Jensen et al. (2004) for further description).

(c) Statistical analyses

The data were analysed using a model extending the gamma-binormal model proposed by Tufto et al. (2005), taking into account various characteristics of the different individuals as covariates. Note that individuals that remained resident during the study period were given a dispersal distance of 0 m, whereas individuals that dispersed away from the local population were given the respective distance in metres as dispersal distance. Consider an individual that migrated from patch i to j. We assumed that the dispersal displacements followed a bivariate gamma-binormal probability density,

equation M3

where σ is the s.d. of the dispersal displacements in either x or y direction and α is a shape parameter specifying the degree of leptokurtosis (for details, see Tufto et al. 2005). The probability of dispersing from some point inside patch j to some point inside patch i will then be approximately proportional to equation M4, where rij is the distance from patch j to patch i and Ai is the area of the recipient patch i. In addition, to incorporate the effect of local heterogeneity, we assumed that the probability of dispersing to a particular patch i was proportional to the habitat quality equation M5 of the recipient patches i.

Only individuals that were recaptured in one of the study patches were included in the analysis (i.e. n=135). The total likelihood of the data, therefore, depends on the probability of observing an individual dispersing from j to i condition on being recaptured, which becomes

equation M6


equation M7

and equation M8.

Characteristics of different individuals may influence the probability of dispersal and expected dispersal distances. Both of these quantities depend on σ. A simple model for how the probability of dispersal and expected dispersal distances is influenced by the characteristics of each individual is therefore to assume that σ, or ln σ (to ensure that σ can take only positive values), is linked to a linear predictor of regression coefficients and individual covariates of interest. The morphological traits body condition index (BC), tarsus length (TA), wing length (WI), bill depth (BD), bill length (BL), visible badge size (VB) and total badge size (TB) were included as possible covariates as well as SEX and STAT (i.e. dispersal status; resident or introduced). Interaction terms between morphological traits and SEX or STAT, respectively, and between SEX and STAT were also considered. Models with interaction terms were considered only if main effects were also present. SEX and STAT were set to −1/2 and +1/2 for males and females and residents and non-residents, respectively. All morphological traits were log transformed and standardized.

The total log likelihood of the data for a particular model is given by the sum of ln mij taken over all individuals, where the mijs are computed using equations (2.1), (2.2), (2.3). Unknown parameters of the model are the average dispersal s.d. σ0, the shape parameter α, patch quality parameters h2, h3, …, hn and the βs in the linear predictor for ln σ. Maximum-likelihood estimates of the parameters were computed using the standard numerical methods, i.e. the optimum function in R, using a quasi-Newton optimization method. Approximately, asymptotic standard errors were computed from the inverse of the Hessian matrix at the maximum likelihood. Model selection was based on the Akaike information criteria (AIC; Burnham & Anderson 2002). A subset of all possible models including up to five covariates were simultaneously fitted to the data.

Statistical analyses were carried out using the software R v. 2.2.1 (R Development Core Team 2004). All statistical tests are two-tailed, and estimates are given ±1 s.d.

3. Results

During the summer and autumn after the introduction experiment was carried out (§2), we recaptured or resighted 135 of the 244 birds involved in the experiment. The resident individuals had a higher probability of being recaptured compared with the introduced individuals (Χ12=6.038, p<0.05), but there was no intersexual difference in the probability for recapture (Χ12=0.02, p>0.05). This may indicate higher survival rates of the residents compared with the introduced individuals, but it is also possible that this observation is a consequence of more frequent long-distance dispersal among introduced individuals (§4). Accordingly, an almost equal number of males (n=67) and females (n=68) were included in the further analyses, where 59 (43.7%; 28 males and 31 females) were introduced individuals and 76 (56.3%; 39 males and 37 females) were resident individuals.

Out of the recaptured birds, a large proportion, 75%, (n=101) remained in their original local population or in the local population they were released when introduced, whereas 25% (n=34) of the individuals dispersed to another local population during the study period and were thus defined as dispersers. Two translocated individuals, one male and one female, returned to their island of origin, Vega, and were thus excluded from the following analyses.

The distribution of dispersal distances in this population followed a leptokurtic pattern (figure 2). The majority of individuals did not disperse (i.e. they were included in the analyses with a dispersal distance of 0 m) or dispersed only short distances, whereas few individuals dispersed long distances (see also Tufto et al. 2005).

Figure 2
Histogram showing distribution of dispersal among (a) male and female house sparrows and (b) resident and introduced individuals of house sparrows in the Vikna archipelago.

Based on the extended gamma-binormal model proposed by Tufto et al. (2005), we composed a set of 194 candidate models, representing relevant hypotheses that could potentially explain the observed dispersal pattern (see §2 for details). The best model, selected according to the Akaike weight criteria (table 1), showed that the estimated dispersal s.d. for an average individual was 13.1±7.6 km. For the estimated value of α=0.56, this corresponds to a median dispersal distance of 9.56±5.4 km. Estimates of parameters included in the selected model are given in table 2.

Table 1
Ten highest ranked models according to AIC, out of 194 in total, explaining the variation in dispersal behaviour, according to a gamma-binormal model (see §2 for further description) in a spatially distributed metapopulation of house sparrows ...
Table 2
Parameter estimates of the best model according to AICw (table 1), describing the relationship between dispersal s.d. as response variable and explanative variables; STAT, SEX, WI and WI*SEX (abbreviations are as given in table 1) in an experimental introduction ...

The best model revealed that the probability of dispersal and expected dispersal distances was influenced by individual status (STAT), i.e. introduced individuals had a higher probability of dispersing and higher expected dispersal distances (tables 1 and and2).2). Furthermore, females had a higher probability of dispersal and longer expected dispersal distances than males, differing by a factor of e0.87=2.38 (table 2). The best model also included a positive interaction between wing length (WI) and sex (tables 1 and and2),2), whereas the main effect of wing length was not significant (table 2). This suggests that females with long wings had a higher probability of dispersal. Accordingly, the best model indicated that the probability of dispersing was higher and the dispersal distance longer, if the individual was introduced, if it was a female and, especially, if the female had long wings.

The best model had an evidence ratio of 1.36 (w1/w2=0.034/0.025) compared with the second best model, which included the same variables as the best ranked model, but in addition included an interaction term between wing length and status (table 1). Even though the evidence ratio in favour of the highest ranked model was moderate, the validity of the model seems substantial, considering that all of the 10 best models included the variables status and sex. In addition, 7 of the 10 top models included wing length and the interaction term wing length and sex. Accordingly, we feel confident that the best model identifies parameters that have considerable influence on the probability of dispersing and the dispersal distances observed.

4. Discussion

In a metapopulation of house sparrows in northern Norway, we have shown that experimentally introduced individuals had a higher probability of dispersing and dispersed longer distances than residents (figures 2b and and3;3; tables 1 and and2).2). Furthermore, females dispersed, on average, more frequently and over longer distances than males (figures 2a and and3;3; tables 1 and and2).2). In females, but not in males, we also found that longer wings were associated with longer dispersal distances (figure 3; tables 1 and and2).2). Only 36 out of 123 introduced individuals (29%) were recaptured at the same place as they were released. This finding is in accordance with an earlier transplant experiment carried out by Krogstad et al. (1996), where reproductive success among inland and coastal populations of house sparrows was investigated. The recapture rate of these introduced individuals was 38% and thus corresponded well with our results. The total rate of recapture in our study was biased towards resident individuals. This could either indicate a higher mortality among the introduced individuals or alternatively that a higher proportion of introduced individuals moved out of our study area. The latter may be likely considering the higher dispersal frequency demonstrated among the introduced individuals compared with the residents (§3), as well as regarding that the two individuals were resighted at the island of their origin.

Figure 3
Predicted s.d.s of dispersal distances (y-axis) among (a) resident individuals and (b) introduced individuals in a population of house sparrows in northern Norway. The relationships between predicted s.d.s of dispersal distances and standardized wing ...

Predicting the patterns of spread of introduced individuals into natural populations is becoming increasingly important owing to introduction incidences of non-indigenous organisms that frequently occur as a result of human activities. Examples of such incidences are escapes of cultured individuals from fish farms (Hindar et al. 1991), and spread of transgenic plants into natural populations (Williamson 1992; Saltonstall 2002), which may threaten the existence of local populations. Accordingly, there is a great need for knowledge about the spatial movements of such organisms in order to successfully control and perform risk assessment of invasive species and organisms.

Measuring organism expansions has been carried out opportunistically after historical introduction events (Duncan et al. 2003) or reintroductions, but there is a lack of ad hoc studies treating issues connected to introduction of non-native individuals (Seddon et al. 2007). In contrast, numerous theoretical investigations aiming to predict the spatial spread of introduced organisms as a function of time are available (Hastings 1996; Kot et al. 1996; Hastings et al. 2005). Many of these models are based on the assumption that the distances of spread increase linearly with time (Hastings 1996) and are mainly concerned about the spread of the organism through subsequent generations (Hastings et al. 2005). Our results show that a considerable amount of movement among such introduced organisms may occur just immediately after an introduction event. This effect should therefore be accounted for in the predictions of intergeneration spatial propagation.

Studies that have identified and quantified important patterns of spread on a large scale among both artificially introduced and resident individuals in a natural vertebrate population are rare (but see e.g. Calvete & Estrada 2004). This may partly be due to methodological problems concerning the identification of dispersal rates (Koenig et al. 1996).

Our results demonstrate the importance of correctly predicting the patterns of spread in endangered populations in which translocations are conducted in order to rescue populations or species suffering from low population sizes, low genetic variability or inbreeding depression (Ebenhard 1995; Hedrick 1995). When successful, the intended introductions can save populations from extinction (Madsen et al. 1999), and hence be a major management tool for conserving biological diversity. Such translocations, however, do show a low rate of success (Griffith et al. 1989; Seddon 1999; Teixeira et al. 2007). One of the factors that are of central importance in the probability of settlement and reproduction is how the individuals that are released into the new area distribute themselves after the introduction event (Tweed et al. 2003). In this respect, our results show that a large proportion of introduced organisms may end up in a place different from the one they were intended to, and that these may not be a random sample of the introduced individuals. A consequence of this may be a decreased rate of success of reintroductions, as it makes the population less viable because individuals may settle in unsuitable habitats or move away from their potential mates. This may be substantiated by the fact that highly mobile organisms like birds are generally less successful at establishing self-sustaining populations after translocations (Wolf et al. 1996). On the other hand, introduction success may also depend upon the high spatial dispersal of the released organism in order to distribute the individuals with novel alleles over a broader range and thus more effectively in the receiver population.

Possible proximate causes of more rapid spread among introduced individuals than among residents may involve social mechanisms where resident individuals behave intolerantly to new individuals (Matthysen 2005). Furthermore, the introduced individuals may also disperse because they cannot find proper shelter or places to forage at the locality they are released (Greenwood & Harvey 1982; Cilimburg et al. 2002). However, the design of our experiment, where half of the native population was replaced by introduced individuals, i.e. no increase in population density, implies that our experimental design did not alter the natural access to food and shelter. Both groups of individuals (residents and introduced) were subject to the same experimental treatment, only differing in the distance between the place of capture and release. Still it is possible that one component of the variation in the observed increase in dispersal behaviour among translocated individuals was due to confusion initiated by the sudden release in unfamiliar surroundings (Teixeira et al. 2007). Accordingly, this additional factor could have potentially influenced translocated individuals in their decisions over settlement or dispersal (Stamps & Swaisgood 2007).

Our results show that females disperse more frequently and over longer distances than males (figures 2 and and3;3; tables 1 and and2).2). This is commonly found in avian studies (Clarke et al. 1997), and is partly thought to be a consequence of inbreeding avoidance (Pusey 1987) as male offspring often return to their natal area for breeding. Interestingly, the generally known patterns of sex-biased dispersal in birds seem to prevail both among individuals that are translocated and in populations experiencing large-scale immigration. Thus, this enables prediction of spread among individuals in introduced and natural populations based on general patterns.

Variation in dispersal patterns has previously been shown to be correlated with different physiological (Snoejis et al. 2004; Haag et al. 2005), behavioural (Clobert et al. 1994; Dingemanse et al. 2003) and morphological traits (Sinervo & Clobert 2003; Sinervo et al. 2006). At the most extreme, there are present, in some species (e.g. crickets and aphids), two distinct morphs, one dispersal morph with wings and another wingless non-dispersing morph (Roff & Fairbairn 1991; Braendle et al. 2006). Although the pattern of distinct dispersal morphs does not apply to birds, it is possible that longer wings contribute to better flying ability (Fitzpatrick 1998), and thus that longer wings should be of higher adaptive value for dispersers. Accordingly, it is possible that the longer-winged individuals are more frequent dispersers under natural conditions as well as under manipulated circumstances.

Dispersal determines the level of gene flow in a population and thus affects local adaptation. When dispersing individuals consist of a non-random sample of the population, this process may have a major impact on population dynamics and evolutionary trajectories (Garant et al. 2005; Postma & van Noordwijk 2005). In a previous study on house sparrows in northern Norway, wing length showed high heritability in females (h2=0.633), but less in males (h2=0.327; Jensen et al. 2003). This implies that dispersing females produce daughters possessing long wings which, according to present results, are also likely to disperse more frequently and over longer distances. Furthermore, wing length is shown to be genetically correlated with other fitness-related traits (Jensen et al. in preparation), suggesting that dispersing individuals may affect the genetic composition and average fitness in recipient populations. The observed dispersal bias towards long-winged individuals may be a consequence of a better physical condition among these individuals. There is now extensive evidence that dispersal may be condition dependent (Ims & Hjermann 2001; Massot et al. 2002), which implies that dispersal decisions may be triggered by different cues, such as population density, resource availability and conspecific dominance. However, even under such circumstances, the individuals that are leaving the resident habitat may have certain phenotypic characteristics, determined by genetic (Sinervo et al. 2006), maternal and environmental effects.

To conclude, we have shown that in a population of both resident and introduced house sparrows, the translocated individuals possessed a greater ability of spatial spread in the environment. In addition, females dispersed to a greater extent and the length of their wings was an important trait for predicting the rate at which they dispersed.

Other factors that might also be important in predicting the spread of introduced individuals in such populations are density or resource availability in each patch and the age structure in each subpopulation (Robert et al. 2004). This has not been tested in our study, but should be considered for future research. The model allows different degrees of densities to affect dispersal pattern, but these effects are not tested explicitly. Nevertheless, our results emphasize the fact that translocated individuals may have wider dispersal pattern than expected, which may have important implications for management. For instance, in cases in which a group of individuals are unintentionally released into the wild, immediate efforts should be made to hinder dispersal, as their spread may be faster and wider than expected. On the other hand, in management programmes where individuals are reintroduced into an area in order to rescue populations from extinction, the present study indicates that larger female-biased groups should be released in order to ensure that a viable population size remains in the area. Altogether, this suggests that dispersal should not be considered as a random process.


We thank Thomas Ezard and one anonymous referee for their helpful comments that improved this manuscript. We are also indebted to B. B. Hansen, S. Henriksen, M. Ingebrigtsen, A. Lorås, M. Mørkved, T. Kolaas, R. Rismark, B. G. Stokke, K. Sørensen and H. Vaagland for their assistance with the fieldwork, and I. Herfindal for making the map and for assistance with R. We are also thankful to the inhabitants at Vikna and Vega who kindly allowed us to carry out this work at their farms. ‘Forsøksdyrutvalget’ and the Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management gave permission to perform this experiment. The Norwegian Research Council, ‘SUP: Strategic University Programme in Conservation Biology’ and ‘Storforsk: Population genetics in an ecological perspective’ funded this project.


  • Aragòn P, Meylan S, Clobert J. Dispersal status-dependent response to the social environment in the Common Lizard, Lacerta vivipara. Funct. Ecol. 2006;20:900–907. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01164.x
  • Blackburn T.M, Duncan R.P. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature. 2001;414:195–197. doi:10.1038/35102557 [PubMed]
  • Born W, Rauschmayer F, Brauer I. Economic evaluation of biological invasions—a survey. Ecol. Econ. 2005;55:321–336.
  • Braendle C, Davis G.K, Brisson J.A, Stern D.L. Wing dimorphism in aphids. Heredity. 2006;97:192–199. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800863 [PubMed]
  • Bubb D.H, Thom T.J, Lucas M.C. Movement, dispersal and refuge use of co-occurring introduced and native crayfish. Freshw. Biol. 2006;51:1359–1368. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01578.x
  • Burnham K.P, Anderson D.R. 2nd edn. Springer; New York, NY: 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretic approach.
  • Butler H, Malone B, Clemann N. Activity patterns and habitat preferences of translocated and resident tiger snakes Notechis scutatus in a suburban landscape. Wildl. Res. 2005;32:157–163. doi:10.1071/WR04027
  • Calvete C, Estrada R. Short-term survival and dispersal of translocated European wild rabbits. Improving the release protocol. Biol. Conserv. 2004;120:507–516. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.023
  • Cilimburg A.B, Lindberg M.S, Tewksbury J.J, Hejl S.J. Effects of dispersal on survival probability of adult yellow warblers Dendroica petechia. Auk. 2002;119:778–789. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0778:EODOSP]2.0.CO;2
  • Clarke A.L, Sæther B.E, Roskaft E. Sex biases in avian dispersal, a reappraisal. Oikos. 1997;79:429–438. doi:10.2307/3546885
  • Clavero M, Garcìa-Berthou E. Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005;20:110. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.003 [PubMed]
  • Clobert J, Lebreton J.D, Allaine D, Gaillard J.M. The estimation of age-specific breeding probabilities from recaptures or resightings in vertebrate populations. 2. Longitudinal models. Biometrics. 1994;50:375–387. doi:10.2307/2533381 [PubMed]
  • Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt A.A, Nichols J.D, editors. Dispersal. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2001.
  • Dingemanse N.J, Both C, van Noordwijk A.J, Rutten A.L, Drent P.J. Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits Parus major. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2003;270:741–747. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2300
  • Dobson F.S. Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim. Behav. 1982;30:1183–1192. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80209-1
  • Duncan R.P, Blackburn T.M, Veltman C.J. Determinants of geographical range sizes: a test using introduced New Zealand birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 1999;68:963–975. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00344.x
  • Duncan R.P, Blackburn T.M, Sol D. The ecology of bird introductions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003;34:71–98. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132353
  • Ebenhard T. Conservation breeding as a tool for saving animal species from extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995;10:438–443. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89176-4
  • Fitzpatrick S. Intraspecific variation in wing length and male plumage coloration with migratory behaviour in continental and island populations. J. Theor. Biol. 1998;29:248–256.
  • Garant D, Kruuk L.E.B, Wilkin T.A, McCleery R.H, Sheldon B.C. Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population. Nature. 2005;433:60–65. doi:10.1038/nature03051 [PubMed]
  • Greenwood P.J, Harvey P.H. The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1982;13:1–21. doi:10.1146/
  • Griffith B, Scott J.M, Carpenter J.W, Reed C. Translocation as a species conservation tool—status and strategy. Science. 1989;245:477–480. doi:10.1126/science.245.4917.477 [PubMed]
  • Haag C.R, Saastamoinen M, Marden J.H, Hanski I. A candidate locus for variation in dispersal rate in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2005;272:2449–2456. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3235
  • Hastings A. Models of spatial spread: is the theory complete? Ecology. 1996;77:1675–1679. doi:10.2307/2265772
  • Hastings A, et al. The spatial spread of invasions, new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol. Lett. 2005;8:91–101. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00687.x
  • Hedrick P.W. Gene flow and genetic restoration—the Florida panther as a case-study. Conserv. Biol. 1995;9:996–1007. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9050996.x
  • Hindar K, Ryman N, Utter F. Genetic-effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1991;48:945–957.
  • Ims R.A, Hjermann D.Ø. Condition dependent dispersal. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt A.A, Nichols J.D, editors. Dispersal. Oxford University press; Oxford, UK: 2001. pp. 203–216.
  • Jensen H, Sæther B.-E, Ringsby T.H, Tufto J, Griffith S.C, Ellegren H. Sexual variation in heritability and genetic correlations of morphological traits in house sparrow Passer domesticus. J. Evol. Biol. 2003;16:1296–1307. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00614.x [PubMed]
  • Jensen H, Sæther B.-E, Ringsby T.H, Tufto J, Griffith S.C, Ellegren H. Lifetime reproductive success in relation to morphology in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. J. Anim. Ecol. 2004;73:599–611. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00837.x
  • Jensen, H., Steinsland, I., Ringsby, T. H. & Sæther, B.-E. In preparation. Effects of indirect selection on the evolution of a sexual ornament and other traits in the house sparrow Passer domesticus.
  • Koenig W.D, VanVuren D, Hooge P.N. Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996;11:514–517. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(96)20074-6
  • Kot M, Lewis M.A, vandenDriessche P. Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. Ecology. 1996;77:2027–2042. doi:10.2307/2265698
  • Krogstad S, Sæther B.-E, Solberg E.J. Environmental and genetic determinants of reproduction in the house sparrow, a transplant experiment. J. Evol. Biol. 1996;9:979–991. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9060979.x
  • Lodge D.M. Prediction and biological invasions—reply. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1993;8:380–381. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90228-H
  • Lynch M, Walsh B. Sinauer; Sunderland, MA: 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits.
  • Madsen T, Shine R, Olsson M, Wittzell H. Conservation biology—restoration of an inbred adder population. Nature. 1999;402:34–35. doi:10.1038/46941
  • Massot M, Clobert J, Lorenzon P, Rossi J.-M. Condition-dependent dispersal and ontogeny of the dispersal behaviour: an experimental approach. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002;71:253–261. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00592.x
  • Matthysen E. Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals. Ecography. 2005;28:403–416. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04073.x
  • McGinnity P, et al. Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2003;270:2443–2450. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2520
  • Postma E, van Noordwijk A.J. Gene flow maintains a large genetic difference in clutch size at a small spatial scale. Nature. 2005;433:65–68. doi:10.1038/nature03083 [PubMed]
  • Pusey A.E. Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1987;2:295–299. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(87)90081-4
  • Puth L.M, Post D.M. Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecol. Lett. 2005;8:715–721. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00774.x
  • R Development Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2004. R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
  • Ringsby T.H, Sæther B.-E, Tufto J, Jensen H, Solberg E.J. Asynchronous spatiotemporal demography of a house sparrow metapopulation in a correlated environment. Ecology. 2002;83:561–569. doi:10.2307/2680035
  • Robert A, Sarrazin F, Couvet D, Legendre S. Releasing adults versus young in reintroductions: interactions between demography and genetics. Conserv. Biol. 2004;18:1078–1087. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00218.x
  • Roff D.A, Fairbairn D.J. Wing dimorphisms and the evolution of migratory polymorphisms among the insecta. Am. Zool. 1991;31:243–251.
  • Sæther B.E, Ringsby T.H, Bakke O, Solberg E.J. Spatial and temporal variation in demography of a house sparrow metapopulation. J. Anim. Ecol. 1999;68:628–637. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00314.x
  • Saltonstall K. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:2445–2449. doi:10.1073/pnas.032477999 [PubMed]
  • Seddon P.J. Persistence without intervention: assessing success in wildlife reintroductions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999;14:503. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01720-6 [PubMed]
  • Seddon P.H, Armstrong D.P, Malo R.F. Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv. Biol. 2007;21:303–312. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x [PubMed]
  • Simberloff D, Parker I.M, Windle P.N. Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2005;3:12–20.
  • Sinervo B, Clobert J. Morphs, dispersal behavior, genetic similarity, and the evolution of cooperation. Science. 2003;300:1949–1951. doi:10.1126/science.1083109 [PubMed]
  • Sinervo B, Calsbeek R, Comendant T, Both C, Adamopoulou C, Clobert J. Genetic and maternal determinants of effective dispersal, the effect of sire genotype and size at birth in side-blotched lizards. Am. Nat. 2006;168:88–99. doi:10.1086/505765 [PubMed]
  • Snoeijs T, Van de Casteele T, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E, Eens M. A strong association between immune responsiveness and natal dispersal in a songbird. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2004;271:S199–S201. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0148
  • Stamps J.A, Swaisgood R.R. Someplace like home: experience, habitat selection and conservation biology. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;102:392–409. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.038
  • Teixeira C.P, De Azevedo C.S, Mendl M, Cipreste C.F, Young R.J. Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: the importance of considering stress. Anim. Behav. 2007;73:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.002
  • Tiedje J.M, Colwel R.K, Grossman Y.L, Hodson R.E, Lenski R.E, Mack R.N, Regal P.J. The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms—ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology. 1989;70:298–315. doi:10.2307/1937535
  • Tufto J, Ringsby T.H, Dhondt A.A, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E. A parametric model for estimation of dispersal patterns applied to five passerine spatially structured populations. Am. Nat. 2005;165:E13–E26. doi:10.1086/426698 [PubMed]
  • Tweed E.J, et al. Survival, dispersal and home range establishment of reintroduced captive-bred puaiohi, Myadestes palmeri. Biol. Conserv. 2003;11:1–9. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00175-1
  • Williamson M. Environmental risks from the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)—the need for molecular ecology. Mol. Ecol. 1992;1:3–8.
  • Wolf C.M, Griffith B, Reed C, Temple S.A. Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conserv. Biol. 1996;10:1142–1154. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041142.x

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society